Backwards Design Articulo
Backwards Design Articulo
Wiggins, G. and McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design. Expanded 2nd Edition. Upper Saddle River,
NJ/Alexandria, VA: Pearson Education/Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
Backwards Design
Wiggins and McTighe’s backwards design model centers on the idea that the learning design process
should begin with identifying the desired learning results, and then "work backwards" to develop instruction,
rather than the traditional approach to define what topics need to be covered. They argue that you can’t start
planning how you’re going to teach until you know exactly what you want your students to learn. Their
framework identifies three main stages:
1. What are big ideas and important understandings students should retain? These choices are the
“enduring understandings” that students should remember after they have forgotten the details of the
course.
2. What knowledge and skills should students master? Sharpen the choices by considering what is
“important for students to know and do.” What concepts, principles, and underlying facts should they
know? What processes, strategies, and methods should they learn to use?
3. What should students hear, read, view, explore, or otherwise encounter? This knowledge is “worth
being familiar with.”
These questions will help instructors determine the best content for their course, and create concrete, specific
learning goals for their students. In other instructional design models this is known as defining goals and
objectives. Wiggins and McTighe ask instructors to consider not only the course goals and objectives, but also
the learning that should endure over the long term. “The enduring understanding” is not just “material worth
covering," but includes the following elements:
Enduring value beyond the classroom
Resides at the heart of the discipline
Requires uncovering of abstract or often misunderstood ideas
Offers potential for engaging students
developing understanding and give students opportunities to demonstrate that understanding. The tasks must
also identify and differentiate levels or degrees of understanding.
An important emphasis is that assessment is part of the learning process and should occur throughout the
sequence, not just at the end. Questions to consider include:
1. How will students and instructor know that students “got it?” What counts as acceptable evidence of
understanding in this class and in this discipline?
2. What assessment tasks will support students in developing understanding?
3. How will the tasks identify and differentiate levels or degrees of understanding throughout the
learning process, not just at the end?