Test 1 Research ND1
Test 1 Research ND1
TEST 1
YEAR 2024
Question 1
Question 2
Question 1
Learners are expected to identify and explain the key importance of marketing research to a
business. The following are the expected importance but not limited to:
Question 2
There are several sampling methods that fall under the umbrella of probability sampling.
These methods not only vary based on the type of research you’re doing and the type of
data you want to yield, but also the amount of time you have to conduct your research and
the tools you have at your disposal. Here are the four main types of probability sampling
approaches that researchers use:
Simple random sampling
In simple random sampling, all members of the population have an equal chance of being
selected and the selection is done randomly. To achieve this, researchers may use tools like
a random number generator to select participants from the overall population to be part of
a sample. However, while simple random sampling is, as the name indicates, the simplest
sampling strategy, it is also prone to bias. For example, the smaller your sample size is
compared to your overall population, the less likely you are to draw a reliable sample totally
at random.
Many populations can be divided into smaller groups based on specific characteristics that
don’t overlap but represent the entire population when put together. With stratified
random sampling, you would draw a sample from each of these groups (or strata)
separately. This allows you to make sure that every subgroup is properly represented, which
leads to more accurate results than simple random sampling.
It’s common to stratify by characteristics like sex, age, income bracket, or ethnicity. The
strata must be specific and mutually exclusive; meaning every individual in the population
should only be assigned to one group. Once you’ve split your population into strata, you
would then use simple random sampling to select individuals from each group, in proportion
to the total population. Those individuals would then be combined into a single sample.
Cluster sampling
Like stratified sampling, cluster sampling also involves separating the population into
subgroups, or clusters. But that’s where the two probability sampling methods diverge.
With cluster sampling, each cluster should have similar characteristics to the population.
Instead of selecting individuals from each and every cluster, you would begin by randomly
selecting entire clusters. If possible, you might include every individual from each selected
cluster in your final sample. If the clusters are too large, you would need to randomly select
individuals from each cluster.
Researchers often use pre-established and easily available groups as clusters. This is
typically based on geographic boundaries, like cities or counties, but it can also be schools or
office locations. Cluster sampling is most often used to save costs when surveying
populations that are very large or spread out geographically. However, there is more risk of
sampling error with cluster sampling. Each cluster is supposed to represent the total
population, but this can be difficult to guarantee.
Systematic sampling
In systematic sampling, each member of the population is assigned a number, and then
selected at regular intervals to form a sample. (Systematic sampling is also known as interval
sampling.) Or, to put it another way, every “nth” individual in the population is selected to
be part of the sample.
For example, in a population of 1,000, you might choose every 9th person for your sample.
This can be more straightforward than other sampling methods, as there is a clear and
systematic approach to picking individuals that doesn’t involve a random number generator.
On the flip side, the resulting selection may not be as random as they would be if a
generator was used. Additionally, it’s important to ensure that there’s no hidden pattern in
the list that may affect the random selection. If there’s risk of data manipulation, the sample
will be skewed and you may end up with over or under representation within your sample.
For instance, say you plan to survey employees within a particular organization, and all the
employees are listed in alphabetical order. You plan to use systematic sampling to select
every 4th employee for your sample. However, if the alphabetical list is also organized by
team and seniority, you might end up choosing too many or two few people in senior roles,
which would lead to bias into your sample.