Notes
Notes
Uses of Multiplexing
Multiplexing is used for a variety of purposes in data communications to enhance
the efficiency and capacity of networks. Here are some of the main uses:
Efficient Utilization of Resources: Multiplexing allows multiple signals
to share the same communication channel, making the most of the
available bandwidth. This is especially important in environments where
bandwidth is limited.
Telecommunications: In telephone networks, multiplexing enables the
simultaneous transmission of multiple telephone calls over a single line,
enhancing the capacity of the network.
Internet and Data Networks: Multiplexing is used in internet
communications to transmit data from multiple users over a single
network line, improving the efficiency and speed of data transfer.
Satellite Communications: Multiplexing helps in efficiently utilizing the
available bandwidth on satellite transponders, allowing multiple signals to
be transmitted and received simultaneously.
Types of Multiplexing
There are five different types of multiplexing techniques, each designed to
handle various types of data and communication needs. These techniques
include:
Frequency Division Multiplexing (FDM)
Time-Division Multiplexing (TDM)
Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM)
Code-division multiplexing (CDM)
Space-division multiplexing (SDM)
1. Frequency Division Multiplexing
Frequency division multiplexing is defined as a type of multiplexing where the
bandwidth of a single physical medium is divided into a number of smaller,
independent frequency channels.
There is also such a thing as an all-pass filter, but I'm not considering it to be one
of the four basic filter types for this article.
Note: A notch filter is a bandstop filter with a narrow bandwidth. Notch filters are
used to attenuate a narrow range of frequencies.
Below are some technical terms that are commonly used when describing filter
response curves:
-3 dB frequency (f3dB). This term, pronounced "minus 3dB frequency",
corresponds to the input frequency that causes the output signal to drop
by -3dB relative to the input signal. The -3 dB frequency is also referred to
as the cutoff frequency. It is the frequency at which the output power is
reduced by one-half (which is why this frequency is also called the "half-
power frequency"), or the output voltage is the input voltage multiplied by
1/√2. For low-pass and high-pass filters, there is only one -3 dB frequency.
However, there are two -3 dB frequencies for band-pass and notch filters—
normally referred to as f1 and f2.
Center frequency (f0). The center frequency, a term used for band-pass
and notch filters, is a central frequency between the upper and lower
cutoff frequencies. The center frequency is commonly defined as the
arithmetic mean (see equation below) or the geometric mean of the lower
and upper cutoff frequency.
Bandwidth (β or B.W.). The bandwidth is the width of the passband, and
the passband is the band of frequencies that do not experience significant
attenuation when moving from the input of the filter to the output of the
filter.
Stopband frequency (fs). This is a particular frequency at which the
attenuation reaches a specified value.
For low-pass and high-pass filters, frequencies beyond the stopband
frequency are referred to as the stopband.
For band-pass and notch filters, two stopband frequencies exist. The
frequencies between these two stopband frequencies are referred to
as the stopband.
Quality factor (Q): The quality factor of a filter conveys its damping
characteristics. In the time domain, damping corresponds to the amount of
oscillation in the system’s step response. In the frequency domain, higher
Q corresponds to more (positive or negative) peaking in the system’s
magnitude response. For a bandpass or notch filter, Q represents the ratio
between the center frequency and the -3dB bandwidth (i.e., the distance
between f1 and f2).
For both band-pass and notch filters:
Q=f0/f2−f1
to an antenna which has gain GT in the direction of the receiver. The receiver’s
antenna has gain GR. As always, antenna gain is equal to directivity times
radiation efficiency, so GT and GR account for losses internal to the antenna, but
not losses due to impedance mismatch.
A simple expression for PR can be derived as follows. First, let us assume “free
space conditions”; that is, let us assume that the intervening terrain exhibits
negligible absorption, reflection, or other scattering of the transmitted signal. In
this case, the spatial power density at range RR from the transmitter which
radiates this power through a lossless and isotropic antenna would be:
PT/4πR2
that is, total transmitted power divided by the area of a sphere of radius RR
through which all the power must flow. The actual power density Si is this amount
times the gain of the transmit antenna, i.e.:
Si=PT/4πR2*GT
The maximum received power is the incident co-polarized power density times
the effective aperture Ae of the receive antenna:
PR,max=AeSico
=Ae PT/4 πR2*GT
This assumes that the receive antenna is co-polarized with the incident electric
field, and that the receiver is conjugate-matched to the antenna. The effective
aperture can also be expressed in terms of the gain GR of the receive antenna:
Ae=λ2/4π*GR
Thus, Equation may be written in the following form:
PR,max=PT GT (λ/4πR)2 *GR
This is the Friis transmission equation. Summarizing:
The Friis transmission equation gives the power delivered to a conjugate-
matched receiver in response to a distant transmitter, assuming co-polarized
antennas and free space conditions.
LP ≜ (λ/4πR)-2
which is known as free space path loss. may be expressed as follows:
-1
PR,max =PT GT Lp GR
The utility of the concept of path loss is that it may also be determined for
conditions which are different from free space. The Friis transmission equation
still applies; one simply uses the appropriate (and probably significantly
different) value of Lp.
A common misconception is that path loss is equal to the reduction in power
density due to spreading along the path between antennas, and therefore this
“spreading loss” increases with frequency. In fact, the reduction in power density
due to spreading between any two distances R1<R2 is:
(PT /4πR12)/ (PT /4πR22 )= (R1 /R2 )2
which is clearly independent of frequency. The path loss Lp in contrast, depends
only on the total distance RR and does depend on frequency. The dependence on
frequency reflects the dependence of the effective aperture on wavelength.
Thus, path loss is not loss in the traditional sense, but rather accounts for a
combination of spreading and the λ2 dependence of effective aperture that is
common to all receiving antennas.
Finally, note that is merely the simplest form of the Friis transmission equation.
Commonly encountered alternative forms include forms in
which GTGT and/or GRGR are instead represented by the associated effective
apertures, and forms in which the effects of antenna impedance mismatch
and/or cross-polarization are taken into account.