Financial Statement Analysis
Financial Statement Analysis
Financial Statement Analysis
CI33
SECTION THREE
CERTIFIED INVESTMENT
AND FINANCIAL ANALYSTS
(CIFA)
STUDY NOTES
GENERAL OBJECTIVES
This paper is intended to equip candidate with knowledge, skills and attitude that will enable
him/her to analyse and interpret the financial statements of a firm
CONTENT
- Subsidiaries
- Associate companies
- Jointly controlled entities
- Evaluating the effect of the inter-corporate investments on financial statements given the
different accounting treatment
- Income statement: components and format of the income statement, revenue recognition
and expenses recognition; analysis of the income statement; common size analysis, ratio
analysis
- Statement of financial position; components and format of statement of financial position
(assets, liabilities and equity), off balance sheet items; analysis of the statement of
financial position; common size analysis, cross sectional analysis, ratio analysis
- Statement of changes in equity; components of equity, equity valuation ratios
- Cash flow statements; components and format of the cash flow statement, categories of
cash flow items, direct and indirect methods for preparing cash flow statements; cash
flow statement analysis; evaluation and uses of cash, common size analysis, free cash
flow to the firm and free cash flow to equity, cash flow ratios, quality of earnings.
Financial statement analysis is defined as the process of identifying financial strengths and
weaknesses of the firm by properly establishing relationship between the items of the balance
sheet and the profit and loss account.
There are various methods or techniques that are used in analyzing financial statements, such as
comparative statements, schedule of changes in working capital, common size percentages, funds
analysis, trend analysis, and ratios analysis.
Financial statements are prepared to meet external reporting obligations and also for decision
making purposes. They play a dominant role in setting the framework of managerial decisions.
But the information provided in the financial statements is not an end in itself as no meaningful
conclusions can be drawn from these statements alone. However, the information provided in the
financial statements is of immense use in making decisions through analysis and interpretation of
financial statements.
The main reason for developing an agreed conceptual framework is that it provides:
The IFRS framework describes the basic concepts that underlie the preparation and presentation
of financial statements for external users. The IFRS framework serves as a guide to the board in
developing future IFRSs and as a guide to resolving accounting issues that are not addressed
directly in an international Financial Reporting Standard or interpretation.
i. Going concern – The enterprise will continue operations for the foreseeable future
ii. Accruals – Revenues and costs are accrued as they are earned and not incurred
iii. Consistency – consistent application of principles from one period to the next
iv. Prudence – Revenues and profits are recognized when realized but all anticipated
liabilities and expenses are recognized
Advantages
1. Intelligibility
This indicates that the information contained in financial statements should be accessible in such
a way that users can comprehend it, so they could communicate the intended meaning. Will
statements be understandable or not depends on how they are compiled by accountants, and how
they are used by the users (decision makers), who should have the basic knowledge to interpret
information and to use them for adoption and implementation of certain business activities.
2. Comparability:
To decide the trend of changes in financial situation and to determine productivity of business
enterprises, it is imperative through consistent adherence to evaluation and measurement of the
effects of business events from period to period. This characteristic should allow investors,
creditors and others to identify and appreciate financial statements of entities in the flow of time,
and to compare the financial statements of different entities. At last, comparability of financial
3. Timeliness:
It entails that if company want that instruments of financial reporting had a great use value,
especially for decision-makers they must be submitted to a reasonable time.
4. Verifiability:
The information is confirmable in the sense that it should ensure credibility and objectivity. It
necessitates that independent observers reach the same or similar conclusions that is not biased
or contains material errors and recognition of the chosen method of assessment is applied free
from material error and subjectivity
Additional information about a company‘s apart from the above information on financial
statements.
1. Management discussion and analysis (M.D.A)
MDA reviews a company‘s financial position in result of operation. Management must highlight
any unfavorable and favorable events affecting the company‘s operations and identify significant
events and uncertainties surrounding the company and its effects on liquidity, capital resources
and results of operations.
3. Auditor‘s report
An external auditor is an independent certified public accountant hired by shareholders to
provide an opinion on whether or not the company‘s financial statements prepared in conformity
with the general accounting provision. There are 4 types of auditor‘s opinion.
- Qualified opinion
This unqualified opinion except for the items relating to the qualification
- Adverse opinion
It indicates that a company‘s financial statements are mis-presented, misstated, and do not
accurately reflect its financial performance and health.
- Disclaimer opinion
Here the audit is insufficient in scope to render an opinion. This may be due to its unavailability
of sufficient collaborating evidence to make an opinion.
Financial statement analysis requires a review of the auditor‘s report to ascertain whether the
company received an unqualified opinion. Anything less than an unqualified opinion increases
the risk of analysis
4. Explanatory notes
Notes are meant for communicating additional information regarding items included or excluded
from the body of statements. The technical nature of notes creates a need or a certain level of
accounting knowledge on the part of the financial analyst. Explanatory notes include information
on:
- Accounting principles and methods employed
- Detailed disclosure regarding individual financial statement items.
- Commitments and contingencies
- Business combinations
- Stock option plans
- Transactions with related parties.
- Legal proceedings
- Significant customers
5. Supplementary information
Certain supplementary information required by accounting regulatory agencies to appear in
either notes to the financial statements or in the cause of companies with publicly traded
7. Proxy statements
A proxy is a means whereby a shareholder authorizes another person to act for him or her at a
meeting of shareholders. A proxy statement contains information necessary for shareholders in
voting on matters for which the proxy is solicited.
Proxy statements contain pertinent information regarding a company including:-
i. The identity of shareholders owning 5% or more of the outstanding shares.
ii. Biography information on the BOD
iii. compensation arrangement with officers and directors
iv. Employees benefit plans and certain transactions with officers and directors related
parties.
v. Voting procedures and information
vi. Background information about the company‘s nominated directors
vii. Executive compensation
9. Footnotes
These are additional notes in financial statement which describes and explains further how
details in the financial statement are arrived and their meaning.
Typically these decisions will have either an investment focus or a stewardship focus.
- investors focus
The emphasis is choosing a portfolio of securities which is consistent with preferences of the
investor for risk, returns, dividend yield liquidity etc.
- stewardship focus
The concern of shareholders is monitoring management and attempting to affect its behavior in a
way deemed appropriate. Management has considerable discretion concerning use and
disposition of resources.
2) Managers
Managers‘ use financial statement information in many of the financing and operating decisions
e.g. debt-equity ratio or interest coverage ratio is frequently important in deciding how much
long term debt to be raised up.
3) Employees
Employees have a vested interest in the construed and profitable operations of their firms.
Employees can also demand financial statements to monitor the viability of their pension plans
5) Customers
Customers have a vested interest in monitoring financial viability of the firm‘s with which they
have long term relationship. This interest is likely to increase when constants develop about
possible bankruptcy.
Whereas SWOT Analysis will help to measure a business unit, idea or project; PESTEL
Analysis will help you measure a market or a contextual environment.
There are variations for the PESTEL acronym, being very common STEEP, PESTELI, PEST,
adding factors like Ethical, Environmental, Ecologic, Legal, International, etc. It is an
unnecessary job, because all of them can be assigned to one of those PESTEL factors – Political,
Economic, Social, Technological and Legal.
See figure below with some important factors that you can consider, as well as others can be
added.
Political
Regulatory bodies and processes, Funding, grants and initiatives, Lobbying/pressure groups,
International pressure groups, Wars and conflict, Political stability
Economic
Economic growth/downturn, Home economy situation, Home economy trends, Overseas
economies and trends, Inflation rates, General taxation issues, Seasonality/weather issues,
Market and trade cycles, Specific industry factors, Market routes and distribution trends,
Customer/end-user drivers, Interest and exchange rates: , International trade/monetary issues,
unemployment
Technological
Competing technology development, Research funding, Associated/dependent technologies,
Replacement technology/solutions, Maturity of technology, Manufacturing maturity and
capacity, , Information and communications, Consumer buying, Mechanisms/technology,
Technology legislation, Innovation potential, Technology access, licensing, patents, Intellectual
property issues, Global communications, Energy uses and costs, Total Cost of Ownership,
Changes in Information Technology, Changes in Internet, Changes in Mobile Technology, Rate
of technology transfer.
Legal
Taxation, Unemployment policies, General taxation issues, Contract enforcement law,
International trades and regulations, Legislation to the industry, Environmental regulations and
protection, Government policies:, Government term and change, Trading policies.
PESTEL factors are important role, however they are beyond the control of the company,
normally must be considered as either threats or opportunities, which can be applied in the
SWOT Analysis. They are macro-economic factors, so they usually differ per continent, country
or region. They are virtually unlimited. The firm must prioritize and monitor those factors that
influence its industry/company. Below an example for a car rental company in a country in the
American continent, outside Brazil and USA
5. Power of customers
This is worse if buyers power is concentrated, products undifferentiated, buyers are aware of
other suppliers‘ price and switching costs are low
IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors is applied in selecting
and applying accounting policies, accounting for changes in estimates and reflecting corrections
of prior period errors.
The standard requires compliance with any specific IFRS applying to a transaction, event or
condition, and provides guidance on developing accounting policies for other items that result in
relevant and reliable information. Changes in accounting policies and corrections of errors are
generally retrospectively accounted for, whereas changes in accounting estimates are generally
accounted for on a prospective basis.
IAS 8 was reissued in December 2005 and applies to annual periods beginning on or after 1
January 2005.
SUMMARY OF IAS 8
Accounting policies are the specific principles, bases, conventions, rules and practices
applied by an entity in preparing and presenting financial statements.
A change in accounting estimate is an adjustment of the carrying amount of an asset or
liability, or related expense, resulting from reassessing the expected future benefits and
obligations associated with that asset or liability.
International Financial Reporting Standards are standards and interpretations adopted
by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). They comprise:
o International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs)
o International Accounting Standards (IASs)
o Interpretations developed by the International Financial Reporting Interpretations
Committee (IFRIC) or the former Standing Interpretations Committee (SIC) and
approved by the IASB.
Materiality. Omissions or misstatements of items are material if they could, by their size
or nature, individually or collectively; influence the economic decisions of users taken on
the basis of the financial statements.
A company should be guided by accounting standards or the current practices in choosing and
applying accounting policies. The standard allows firms to change their accounting policies
when;
iii) The new change will result in a fair presentation of the financial performance and position.
When a company changes its policies, then the change should be accounted for respectively i.e.
the previously reported financial statements should be adjusted/restated to reflect the new policy
for comparison purposes.
Example:
A Ltd. has decided to change its policy of writing off borrowing costs to capitalizing the same.
As at 31st December, 2003, the company had written off borrowing costs amounting to £200,000.
During the year ended 31/12/04. The company reported profit for the period of £450,000 but
after charging borrowing costs of £50,000. As at 31/12/03 the retained profits were £1,500,000.
Other transactions were:-
Required: Prepare the statement of changes in equity extract for the year-ended 81/12/04
In preparing financial statements, it may be difficult to arrive at exact values for certain items to
be presented in the financial statements and thus estimates are normally used.
Examples of estimates: Depreciation, provision for doubtful debts and other provisions in
relation to contingent liabilities e.g. pending court cases (suits)
These estimates are based on the available information as at the time of preparing financial
statements.
However, in subsequent financial periods, changes may be required on these estimates because
of new information becoming available. IAS 8 requires that a change in accounting estimate
should be accounted for in the period in which the change arises and where relevant, in other
subsequent financial period. E.g. an increase or decrease in provision for doubtful debts will be
adjusted for in the current year‘s income statement whereas depreciation will not only be
adjusted for in the current year but also in the subsequent financial periods. i.e. the remaining
Net Book Value of the assets will be depreciated over the remaining useful life starting with the
current financial period.
Example:
B Ltd., bought an item of plant at a total cost of £100,000. The estimated useful life
commencing from 1st January 2000 was 10 years. At the start of the 4th year it was discovered
that the actual estimated useful life of the plant was 8 years and not 10 years.
Required: Compute the depreciation charge for each of the eight years on the plant.
= 70,000
5
=£ 14,000
Errors
An error is an error discovered in the current financial period but it relates to one or more
previous financial periods. Such errors arise due to mathematical mistakes, misapplication of
accounting policies, oversights and fraud.
The statement requires that if such an error is material i.e. the previously reported financial
statements were materially misstated or misrepresented, then, the opening balances of the current
financial period must be restated and if practical, the previous financial statements should be
restated.
Therefore an error requires retrospective application.
Example:
ABC Ltd., reported the following transactions during the year ended 31/12/2004
After the above balances were extracted, new information came to light that the opening
inventory was overstated by £10,000 due to double counting of some stock items.
Required: Prepare the statement of changes in equity extract for the year ended 31 st December
2004.
Question:
The following trial balance relates to Venus ltd as at 31st march 2010
Sh‖000‖ Sh‖000‖
Sales 236 200
Purchases 127 850
Distribution costs 8 000
Administration expenses 4 400
Loan interest paid 2 400
Preference dividend paid 1 000
Land and buildings (at valuation) 130 000
Plant and equipment (cost) 84 300
Software (at cost) 10 000
Available for sale investments 12 000
Depreciation (1 April 2009):Plant and equipment 24 300
Software 6 000
Loss on cash stolen 32 000
Trade receivables 23 000
Inventory (1 April 2009) 19 450
Bank 350
Trade payable 15 200
Ordinary share capital 60 000
10% preference shares (redeemable) 20 000
12% loan stock 40 000
Deferred tax 3 000
Available for sale investment reserve 5 000
Revaluation reserve (property, plant and equipment) 40 000
Retained profit - 4 350
454 400 454 400
Additional information:
1. Sales include an amount of sh.8 million for goods sold to a customer who was meant to confirm
acceptance of the goods by 31 March 2010. The customer had not confirmed his acceptance of
the goods by 31 March 2010. The goods were sold at a gross profit margin of 25%.
2. The closing inventory as at 31 March 2010 was valued at cost at sh. 8.5 million. However, goods
costing sh.500 000 were damaged and could only be sold for sh.300 000
3. On 1 April 2009, Venus ltd. revalued the land and buildings. The details are as follows:
The buildings had an estimated useful life of 40 years when they were acquired and this has not
changed. The relevant entries in the revaluation reserve have already been passed.
4. Plant and equipment depreciated at 20% per annum on the reducing balance basis, software is
depreciated using the sum of digits methods over 5 years
5. The available for sale (AFS) investment had a decline in market value of sh.1.2million which was
not reflected in the accounts before the current year‘s revaluations.
6. The cash loss of sh.32 million was discovered during the current financial year but was traced to a
senior employee who left in the year ended 31 March 2009. This money cannot be recovered and
is to be written off
7. The estimated current year‘s tax is sh.11.3 millions. The taxable temporary differences as at 31
March 2010 amounted to sh.16 million
8. Corporation tax rate is 30%
Required:
Prepare the following statements for publication purposes:
a) The statement of comprehensive incomes for the year ended 31 March 2010. (8 marks)
b) The statement of changes in equity as at 31 march 2010. (4 marks)
c) The statement of financial position as at march 2010 (8 marks)
Suggested solution:
Workings:
1. Sales 236 200-8 000 228 200
2. Cost of sales
Opening stock 19 450
Purchases 127 850
Available for sale 147 300
Closing stock (8 500+6000) (14 500)
Cost of goods sold 132 800
Depreciation
Buildings (105 000/36) 2 917
PPE (84 300-24 300) 12 000
Software (3/15*10 000) 2 000
Cost of sales 149 717
3. Administration costs
Reported 4 400
Write down value in stock 200
Cash loss 32 000
36 600
5. Accruals
Loan interest (4 800-2 400) 2 400
Preference dividend (2 000-1 000) 1 000
3 400
6. Tax expense
Estimate 11 300
Increase in deferred liability* 1 800
13 100
Deferred tax liability
Taxable timing difference of 16 000
7. AFS investment
Reported 12 000
Decline in value (1 200)
New balance* 3 800
Revaluation reserve on AFS
Balance b/f 5 000
Decline in value (1 200)
New balance 3 800
8. Receivables
Reported 23 000
Sale or return (8 000)
15 000
9. Closing inventory to SOFP
T.B + sale or return-write down (8 500+6 000-200) 14 300
Non-current assets
Land and buildings (130,000-2 917) 127 083
Pand E (23 000-8 000) 48 000
Software (10 000-8 000) 2 000
AFS assets 10 800
187 883
Current assets
Inventory (8 500+6 000-200) 14 300
Receivables (23 00-8 000) 15 000
Total assets 217 183
Additional information:
1. The 10% convertible loan stock is secured against the plant.
6. The firm had signed a contract for Sh.23,243,000 being the lower of cost and net realisable
value.
8. The stock as at 30 June 2000 was Sh.23,243,000 being the lower cost and net realisable
value.
10. After payment of the preference dividend in March 2000, the company decided to redeem
these shares and this was done in June 2000. No entries have been made in the books in
respect of the same. The shares were redeemed at a premium of 5% and this is to be written –
off in the share premium account.
Required:
(a) An Income Statement (using the cost of sales method: do not attempt to classify expenses
according to their functions). (8 marks)
(b) A statement of Changes in Equity for the year ended 30 June 2000. (8 marks)
(Total: 25 marks)
Solution
Shirika Jipya
Income statement for the year ended 30 June 2000
Sh.000 Sh.000
Turnover 179,100
Cost of sales (W1) (143,023)
Gross profit 35,077
Other operating income: Profit on disposal 173
Investment income 300 473
Expenses 35,550
Other expenses (W) 24556
Finance cost 832 (25,388)
Profit before tax 10,162
Income tax expense (4,200)
Profit for the period 5,962
Shirika jipya
Statement of changes in equity for the year ended 30 june 2000
1. The above financial statements have been prepared under the historical basis of
accounting which is modified to accommodate revaluation of certain assets. They
are in compliance with the applicable IFRSs and the Company‘s Act.
2. The profit for the period has been arrived at after charging:
Sh.000
Directors fee 122
Depreciation 743
Auditors remuneration 53
Staff costs 24328
6. The firm has signed a contract of Sh.8.775m for the construction of a warehouse for
storage of goods.
Workings
1.
25,073
Cost of sales 141,450
Opening stock 166,523
Purchases (23,243)
Closing stock
143,280
Add: Depreciation on:
Buildings 53
690
Plant 144023
Note: Under IAS 32 redeemable preference shares are treated as a non current liability.
Therefore any dividends paid thereon are finance costs and it will not appear as part of
shareholders funds.
Sh.000
5. 15,375 21,525
Final dividends 35x
25
Preference share capital (6% x 750 – 32) 13
21,538
8. Accruals
Wages 473
VAT 681
Interest 350
Audit fee 53
1,557
9. Accrued tax
Estimated for year 4,290
Overestimated (15)
Paid
(738)
3,537
Example Four
Viatu Ltd, which manufactures footwear, makes up its accounts to 31 March each year. The company has
an authorized share capital of Sh. 600,000,000 divided into 15,000,000 6.5% preference shares of Sh. 20
each and 30,000,000 ordinary shares of Sh. 10 each. The following trial balance was extracted as at 31
March 2002.
Additional information:
1. Wages and salaries include salary paid to Managing Director of Sh. 30,000,000 and salary paid to
Sales Director of Sh. 25,000,000.
4. Timing differences of Sh. 4,000,000 are expected to reverse in the near future.
6. Corporation tax for the year is Sh.11; 820,000.The corporation tax rate is 30%on adjusted profit.
7. Land and buildings were professionally valued at Sh.300,000,000 at the year end. The directors wish
to incorporate the valued amount in the financial statements.
Required
(a)Income statement for the year ended 31 March 2002 (13 marks)
(b)Statement of financial position as at 31 March 2002 (12 marks)
(The above two statement should be presented in the form suitable for publication in accordance with the
requirements of International Accounting Standards .IASs)
Solution
Viatu Ltd
Income statement for the year ended 31 March 2003
Sh.‘000‘ Sh.‘000‘
Turnover (W1) 1,190,694
Cost of sales (699,922)
Gross profit 490,657
Other Incomes : Discount received 812
Profit on disposal 15
Investment income 2,680 3,507
494,164
Selling and distribution expenses 176,104
Administrative expenses 245,688
Finance costs 1,600 (423,392)
Profit before tax 70,772
Income tax expense: Current 11,820
Deferred (1,800) (10,020)
Profit for the period 60,752
Workings
1. Turnover Sh.‘000‘
As per trial balance 1,191,864
Less proceeds and disposals (1,215)
1,190,649
3. Administrative expenses
Wages and salaries 70,834
As per TB 11,492
Audit fees 1,400
Depreciation: fixtures 1,040
Compensation of director for loss of office 8,500
Provision for doubtful debts (16,822 – 14,400) 2,422
Director‘s fee 150,000
245,688
Sh.‘000‘ Sh.‘000‘
Profit U Loss 1,800
Bal c/d (30% x 4,000) 1,200 Bal b/d 3,000
3,000 3,000
Notes to the accounts
Note 1 Accounting policies
These financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost basis of accounting, which is
modified to accommodate the revaluation of certain properties and in accordance with the applicable
IFRSs.
Property plant and equipment is shown at cost or revalued amount less the total accumulated depreciation
which is based on the estimated useful life of the assets.
Inventory has been stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value.
The profit before tax has been arrived at after charging the following expenses
Sh.‘000‘
Directors fee 205,000
Compensation to director for loss of office 8,500
Depreciation 13,650
Auditors fee 1,400
Staff costs 40,834
Note 3 Taxation
Corporation tax is based on the adjusted profits for tax purpose at a corporation tax rate of 30%
Adjusting events are events after the reporting date which provides additional evidence of the
conditions existing at the reporting date.
Non-adjusting events are events after the reporting date which concern conditions that arose after
reporting date.
i. Irrecoverable debts arising after the reporting date, which may help qualify the allowance
for receivables as at the reporting date
ii. Allowance for inventories due to evidence of the net realizable value
iii. Amount received in respect of insurance claims which were being negotiated at the
reporting date
iv. The discovery of fraud or errors
Illustration:
Shortly after the reporting date, a major credit customer of the company went into liquidation
because of heavy trading loss and it‘s expected that little or none of the ksh.1, 250,000 debts will
be recoverable. Ksh.1, 000,000 of the debt relates to the sales made prior to the year ended 31 st
In 2012 financial statements the whole debt has been written off, but one of the directors has
pointed out that, as the liquidation is an even after the reporting date, the debt should not in fact
be written off but disclosure should be made by note to this year‘s financial statements, and the
debt written off in 2013 financial statements.
Required:
Advise whether the director is right?
Solution:
Under IAS 10 an event after the reporting date is an event which occurs between the
financial period and the date on which financial statements are approved by the board of
directors
Ksh.1,000,000 of the receivable existed at the reporting date and the liquidation of the
major customer provides more information about receivables
In accordance with IAS 10, this is an adjusting event which would require the debt
existing at the reporting date to be written off in the 2012 financial statements
The remaining receivable did not exist at the reporting date and should therefore be
written off in 2013 financial statements.
Illustration 1:
On 1st January 20x1, john‘s pizza company bought a chicken processing machine for ksh.200,
000. It has an expected useful life of 10 years and a nil residual value. On December 20x2, after
2 years of using the assets, john‘s company decides to sell the machine and starts action to locate
a buyer. The machines are in short supply so john‘s is confident that the machine to dismantle
the machine and market it available to the buyer.
Required:
At what value should the machine be stated in john‘s company statement of financial position?
Solution:
Fair value
= 150,000 − 5,000
= 145,000
The machine qualifies as held for sale, so it should be stated at lower of ksh. 160,000 which is
ksh 145,000
The impairment loss of ksh.15, 000 incurred in writing down the machine to fair value less costs
to sell will be charged to the income statement.
Illustration 2:
On January 20x0, XYZ purchased a machine for ksh.100, 000. It was expected that it would have
a useful life of 8 years and a residual value ksh.20.000. However, during 20x1 December, the
directors decided to sell the machine. The company removes the machine from the farm in
readiness for quick disposal and prepares the machine for viewing by potential purchasers. They
appoint an agent to assist with marketing and advertising. The agent advises that the disposal
may take two to six months but should be sold for ksh. 45,000.
Solution:
Machine
Opening balance 90,000
Depreciation (10,000)
Closing 80,000
Balance impairment (35,000)
Recoverable amount 45,000
Discontinued operations are required to be shown separately in order to help users to predict
future performance.
Presentation of operations in the financial statement
An entity must disclose a single amount on the face of income statement, comprising a total of:
The post-tax profit/loss of discontinued operations.
The post-tax gain or loss recognized on the measurement of fair values less costs to sell
on disposal, of the assets constituting the discontinued operations.
An analysis for this single amount must be presented, either in the notes on the face of income
statement.
Illustration:
Valentine produced cards and sold roses. However, halfway through the year ended 31 st march
20x6, the rose business was closed and assets sold of incurring losses on disposal of non-current
assets of $76,000 and redundancy costs of $37,000. The directors reorganized the continuing
business at a cost of $98,000. Trading results may be summarized as follows:
Required:
Draft the income statement for the year ended 31st march 20x6.
Income statement for valentine for the year ended 31 st march 20x6
$‘000‘
Continuing operations 650
Cost of sales (320)
Gross profit 330
Administration costs (120)
Distribution costs (60)
Operating profit 150
Reorganization costs (98)
52
Finance costs(interest payable) (17)
Profit before tax 35
Income tax (31)
Profit for the period from continuing operations 4
Discontinued operations
Loss for the period from total operations (143)
Loss for the period from total operations (139)
In the notes to the accounts disclose analysis of the discontinued operations figure
$‘000‘
Example:
During the year ended31/12/2008, A Ltd. had estimated the corporation tax for the year to be
£100,000. The amount was still outstanding as at 31/12/08. During the year ended 2009, on
30th June the actual amount payable was agreed with the tax authorities and eventually paid.
Meanwhile during the year 2009, the company paid additional investment taxes of £80,000.
As at the end of the year the company the company estimated that he payable for year 2009
will be £120,000.
August 2015 www.fb.com/kasnebcsia
40
Required:
Compute the income tax expense and the balance sheet liability for year 2009 assuming that;
a) The actual tax paid for year 2008 was £90,000
Deferred tax
This is the tax that is payable or that would be saved in future. If it is payable then it is called a
deferred tax liability and if it will be saved then it is called deferred tax asset. Deferred tax arises
because of the differences in the way traditions are treated in accounting and the way they are
treated after tax. Deferred tax is the basis of allocating tax charges to particular accounting
periods. The key to deferred taxation lies in two quite different concepts of;
1) Accounting profit (reported profit)
- This is the figure of profit before tax reported to the shareholders in the published
accounts.
2) Taxable profits
- This is the figure of profit on which the taxation authorities base their calculation
The difference between accounting profit and taxable profit is caused by permanent differences
and temporary differences
August 2015 www.fb.com/kasnebcsia
41
Permanent differences
i. One difference between accounting profit and taxable profit is caused by certain items
not being taxable/allowable
ii. Differences which only impact on tax computation of one period
iii. Differences which do not have deferred tax consequences whatsoever
Temporary differences
These are sometimes called timing differences. These are differences between the carrying
amount of an asset and for tax purposes
Examples:
i. Certain types of incomes and expenditures that are taxed on cash rather than on accrual
basis e.g. provisions which can be used by a company but which tax authorities don‘t
recognize.
ii. The difference between depreciation charged on a non current asset that qualifies for tax
allowances and the actual allowance tax depreciation) given.
A temporary difference arises when an expense is allowed for both tax and accounting purposes
but the timing of the allowance differs e.g. if relief for capital expenditure is given at a faster rate
for tax purposes than depreciation in the financial estimates, the tax charged will be lower in the
first years than it could have been if based on accounting profit but in the subsequent years the
tax charge will be higher.
Example;
A firm bought an item of plant at a total amount of £50,000. During the first year, the firm
provided for depreciation of 10,000. The item of plant has a capital allowance of`£15,000 for the
first year.
Required: Compute the carrying amount of the asset, the tax base and hence the temporary
difference.
Application scenario
a) Revaluation of non-current assets
- Deferred tax should be recognized on revaluation gain even when there is no intention to
sell the asset or roll over relief available on the gain.
- The revaluation of noncurrent assets results in taxable temporary differences and so its
liability. This is charged as a component of other comprehensive income (alongside the
revaluation gain reserve). It is therefore disclosed either in the statement of cash inflow
(SOCI) or in a statement showing other comprehensive incomes.
b) Tax loses-
- When used tax losses are carried forward a deferred tax asset can be recognized to the
extent taxable profit will be available in the future to offset the losses against.
- If an entity doesn‘t expect to have taxable profits in future, it cannot recognize an asset in
its own account. If however the entity is part of a group and many surrender the tax losses
to other groups and companies, a deferred tax asset may be recognized in the
consolidated accounts.
- The asset is equal to the losses expected to be utilized multiplied by the tax rate.
Changes in tax rates
The corporation tax may change from one period to the next e.g. the tax rate for 2010 may be
33% and 2011 35%. The question is which tax rate should be used in computing deferred tax for
the current year (assuming the current year is 2010) if a company uses the current year‘s tax rate
then it is called the deferral method.
If a company uses the subsequent years tax rate i.e. 35%, in this case unless the subsequent tax
rate is not known in which case the firm can use the deferral method.
Deferred tax assets are the amounts of income taxes recoverable in future periods in respect of:
- Deductible temporary differences
- The carry forward of unused tax loses
- The carry forward of unused tax credits
2. As at January Thames Ltd had a current tax liability of ksh 3,000,000. During the year ended
31st December 2010, the company estimated that the corporation tax liability after adjusting its
profits for tax papooses is at Ksh 12,000,000. The company made installment tax payment
specifically for the year 2010 amounting to ksh 10,000,000.
Required:
a) Compute the income tax expense for the year 2010 assuming that:
i. The current tax as at 1st January 2010 was paid during the year at Ksh
2,800,000 in addition to 2010 installment
ii. The current tax rates as 2010 was paid at ksh 3,400,000 in addition to
installment of the year 2010
b) The income tax liability that would be presented in the statement of financial position
Solution:
Tax expense composition
Provision 12 000 000
Over/under subscription 200 000 (3M-2.8M)
Deferred tax
a) i) Tax expense
Current estimate 12 000 000
Less: overprovision (3M-2.8) (200000)
11 800 000
ii)
Current estimate 12 000 000
Add: under provision (3.4M-3M) 400 000
12 400 000
b)
Current years estimate 12 000 000
Less: installments payment 10 000 000
Current tax liability 2 000 000
Show the income statement for the year ended 31st December 20x8 and the liability for income
taxes in the statement of financial position at that date.
Solution:
Revenue 1 500 000
Operating costs 900 000
Profit before tax 600 000
Tax estimate (30%) 180 000
Over provision (3 000)
Income tax expense 177 000
Net income after tax 423 000
Unless otherwise you are told about new balances of timing differences, assume they are
taxable timing differences and write about your assumption.
QUESTION THREE:
Noel is preparing accounts for the year ended 31 st December 2011. The deferred tax provision
was $78,000 and past cumulative timing differences of $180,000, have accumulated at the year
end. Tax at 30% is estimated at $254,000
Required:
Prepare statement of financial position and income statement extracts for the year ended 31 st
December 2011
Deferred tax liability
An increase in deferred tax liability increases income tax expense for the year
A decrease in deferred tax liability decreases income tax expense for the year
An increase in deferred tax asset decreases income tax expense for the year
A decrease in deferred tax asset increases income tax expense for the year
QUESTION FOUR:
As at 30th September 2011, Grace has non-current assets with a carrying value of ksh 1,100,000
but a tax written down value of Ksh 700,000. The brought forward balance on the deferred tax
account is ksh 300,000. Assume a tax rate of 30%.
Compute the effect of deferred tax on the financial statement for the year ended 30th
September 2011.
Solution:
Step 1: Determining timing difference
b) Income statement
Effect is to decrease income tax expense by 180 000
A taxable temporary difference of £125,000 has accumulated at the year. Income tax 20% is
estimated at £30,000.
a) Prepare the deferred tax note
b) Prepare the income statement and tax note.
Solution:
a) Deferred tax
£
Opening balance 19 000
Increase 6 000
Closing balance(0.2x125000) 25 000
b) Income statement
QUESTION SIX:
A company has provided the following information regarding tax, during the year ended 31 st
December 2008.
i. As at 2008 the balance brought down on the current tax account and deferred tax (all
liabilities) was $20,000 and $40,000 respectively
ii. The current tax brought forward was finally settled at $25,000
August 2015 www.fb.com/kasnebcsia
48
iii. Current years‘ tax estimate is $150,000 with installment payment of $120,000 having
been made
iv. The following items are considered for the purpose of computing the deferred tax
balances as at December 2008
Property, plant and equipment had a carrying value of $200,000 and tax base of
$100,000
Intangible assets amounted to $10,000 but this had already been allowed as an
expense in full for tax purpose
Inventory was valued at cost of $120,000 and had a net realizable value of
$115,000. The actual cost is normally used for tax purpose
Receivables amounted to $100,000 after making a general allowance of $10,000.
The general allowance is not allowed for tax purpose
Corporation tax is 30%
Required:
Compute the income tax expense, the current and deferred tax liabilities to the statement of
financial position.
Solution:
Working 1:
In statement of financial position we will have a deferred tax liability of 28 500 replacing the b/f
of 40 000, the difference of 11 500is credited to income tax expense a/c.
Sometimes, IAS requires a company to adjust increase or decrease in deferred tax a/c in the
reserve and not in income statement (or through the income tax expense)
This happens when temporary differences arise as a result of some devaluation whose gain/loss
has been reported in reserves e.g. revaluation reserve.
QUESTION SEVEN:
Assume that a firm bought some building at a total cost of $100,000 on January 1 2008. The
depreciation charge is straight line based on 50 years while capital allowance for the first year is
3% on cost. As at December 31st 2008 the buildings were valued to $100,000.
Required:
a) Compute the carrying amount, the tax base and the temporary difference of the
building indicating the temporary differences arising due to revaluation
b) Assuming a corporation tax of 30%, give the relevant journal entry to record
revaluation and the deferred tax effects as at 31-12-2008.
Solution:
Jan 2008 = 100 000
Depreciation straight line for 50 years
Capital allowance = 3%
Revaluation = 100 000
i) $000
Cost as at 1.1.2008 100
Depreciation for the year (2)
Carrying amount before revaluation 98
Revaluation gain (100-98) 2
Carrying amount after revaluation 100
Tax base 97
Taxable timing difference 3
Taxable timing difference to revaluation 2
QUESTION EIGHT:
The following statements of financial position relates to elgonltd, a public limited company, as at
30 September 2010:
Sh.‖ 000‖
Non-current assets at cost:
Plant, property and equipment 10 000
Goodwill 6 000
Other intangible assets 5 000
Financial assets (cost) 9 000
30 000
Current assets:
Trade receivables 7 000
Other receivables 4 600
Cash and bank balances 6 700
Total assets 48 300
Equity and liabilities:
Ordinary share capital 15 000
Other reserves 5 000
Retained Earnings 9 630
Total equity 29 630
Non-current liabilities:
Deferred tax 3 600
Employee benefits 4 000
7 600
Current liabilities:
Current tax 4 070
Trade and other payables 7 000
11 070
Total equity and liabilities 48 300
2. The company has not accounted for an increase in the present value of past service cost
of sh.520 000
Sh‖000‖
Property, plant and equipment 2 400
Trade receivables 7 500
Other receivables 5 000
Employee benefits 5 000
Other intangible assets were software development costs which were all allowed for tax
purposes when the costs were incurred in 2008
Trade and other payables include an accrual for compensation to be paid to employees.
This amounts to sh.1 500 000 and is allowed for tax when paid
5. Assume a corporation tax rate of 30% in the current year and 32% in the previous years
Required:
Calculate the provision for deferred tax as at 30 September 2010 after any necessary adjustment
showing how the provision for deferred tax would be dealt with in the financial statements
Suggested solution:
The deferred tax liability of the 3054 is posted to statement of financial position.
The decrease in deferred tax liability is credited to income tax expense SOCI (3 600-3 054)=546
QUESTION NINE
(a) (i) Explain the rationale behind providing deferred tax based on temporary differences (4 marks)
(ii) Polytech Limited has a deferred tax liability of sh.100 million as at 1 October 2011. During the year
ended 30 September 2012, the following information was available for computation of deferred tax:
1. Property, plant and equipment had a carrying amount of sh. 1,200 million and a tax base of
sh.1,000 million. Some land and building were revalued upwards by sh.50 million during the year
ended 30 September 2012
2. Intangible assets consisting of trade licenses being amortized over five years had a carrying
amount of sh.60million. this has been allowed for tax purposes
3. The company has available for sale financial assets with a carrying amount of sh.20 millions and
financial assets at fair value through profit and loss of shillings 10 million. Both financial assets
reported losses in fair value of sh.2 million each as at 30th September 2012
4. Inventory is shown at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The cost is sh.800 million while
net realizable value is sh.780 million
5. Trade receivables had a carrying amount of sh.500 million (unrealized). Both the allowance and
exchange gain are not allowed for tax purposes
6. Trade and other payables are stated at sh.900 million after making a provision for discount of
sh.10 million
Assume a tax rate of 30%.
Required:
Temporary differences for the year ended 30 September 2012. (6 marks)
Suggested solution:
a) (i)
Deferred tax arises because of differences in the way the government and accountants treat some income
and expense items. In order to comply with the matching concept, then it is important to report the
possible tax that will be paid or settled in the future in the current financial statements.
QUESTION TEN:
Jenga ltd. had a deferred tax liability balance forward of sh.2 million. As at 31 December 2008,
the firm hand the following assets:
Assets Carrying amount Tax Base
Sh‖000‖ Sh‖000‖
Property, plant and equipment 20, 000 10, 000
Receivables 8, 000 8, 500
Inventory 7, 500 8, 000
Temporary difference due to revaluation of buildings in the year was sh.1, 000, 000
Required:
Compute the deferred tax liability as at December 2008 and show the relevant journal entry
Suggested solution:
Jenga Ltd
Deferred tax
Sh‖000‖ Sh‖000‖
Balance b/f 2 000
Balance c/d (30%x9 000) 2 700 Increase in def. tax liability 700
2 700 2 700
Journal entries:
Sh‖000‖ sh‖000‖
Dr. Revaluation reserve 300
Dr. Income statement 400
Cr. Deferred tax liability 700
CA TB TD
PPE 20000 10000 10000-ttd
Receivables 8000 8500 50dtd
Inventory 7500 8000 50-dtd
900
EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS
Employment benefits form a very important constituent of an entity‘s expenses. Employers offer
benefits that can be enjoyed by employees during the period commencing from the completion of
the employee‘s service. These benefits are offered as part of the remuneration package.
Post-employees benefits are employee‘s benefits payable after the completion of employment.
They include retirement benefits, such as pensions, post-employment life insurance and post
employment medical care. Arrangements whereby an entity provides post-employment benefits
are known as post-employment plan.
Post-employment benefits plans are either:
Defined contribution plans; or
Defined benefit plans
V. Actuarial gains/losses
The actuarial gains/losses arise due to annual valuation of obligation and plan assets
comprising:
Actuarial gain or loss on obligation arises due to difference between the actual
and assumptions.
If the actual present value of future obligation is less than assumptions, there is actuarial gain and
vice versa.
Actuarial gain/loss on the plan asset arises due to differences in the actual and
expected returns
If the actual return on plan assets is more than the expected then there is actuarial gain and vice
versa.
The actuarial gain or loss is determined by adding the effects of the above differences.
Experience adjustments are another term for effects or differences between the previous actuarial
assumptions and what has actually occurred.
Any related actuarial gain or losses and past service cost that had not been
previously recognizes
Amends the terms of a defined benefit plan such that a material element of qualify only
for reduced benefits
A curtailment may arise from an isolated event, such as the closing of a plan, discontinuance of
an operation or termination or suspension of a plan
A settlement occurs when an enterprise enters into a transaction that eliminates all further legal
or consecutive obligation for part or all of the benefits under a defined benefit plan, for example,
when a lump-sum cash payment is made to, or on behalf of, plan participants in exchange for
their rights to receive specified post employment benefits.
CORRIDOR AMORTIZATION
Due to off-setting of the assets gains and losses and the liability gains and losses the accumulated
total unrecognized net gain or loss may not grow too large. It is however possible and offsetting
may not occur and the balance in the unrecognized net gain or loss account may grow to a large
amount. In order to limit its growth some amount of it may be amortized when it gets large.
The amount to be amortized would usually be the excess of the net unrecognized gain or loss
above some specified level. International Accounting Standard No 19 recommends that
enterprises amortize the gain or loss above (i.e. the excess) 10% of the LARGER of the
beginning balances of the projected benefit obligation or the market-related value of the plan
asset. The amount of excess unrecognized gain or loss to be amortized is determined as follows.
The amortization for a period is calculated by dividing the excess by the average remaining
service period of active employees expected to receive benefits under the plan. Any other
systematic method of amortization of the unrecognized gains and losses may be used.
The limits of ‗corridor‘ is simply the larger or the greater of the 10% of
a) The present value of the obligation before deducting plan assets at the beginning of the
year and
b) 10% of the fair value of plan asset at the beginning of the year
a) Vested benefit
These are benefits that the employee is entitled to receive even if the employee renders
no additional service under the plan. Under most pension plans, a certain minimum
number of years of service to the employer are required before an employee achieves
vested benefits status. The vested benefits pension obligation is computed using current
salary levels and includes only vested benefits
Under this method the measure of obligation is based on the computation of the deferred
compensation amount on all years of service performed by employees under the plan,
both vested and non-vested using current salary levels.
Under this method, the obligation measure is based on the computation of deferred
compensation amount on both vested and non-vested service using future salaries.
Because future salaries are expected to be higher than current salaries, the method results
in the highest measurement of the benefit obligation. The choice between the above
measures of pension obligation is critical because it affects the amount of pension
liability and the pension expense reported.
MINIMUM LIABILITY
Minimum liability is a liability that occurs when the accumulated benefit obligation exceeds the
fair value (not market value) of plan assets.
In calculating minimum liability the plan assets are compared with the smaller accumulated
benefit obligation instead of the larger projected obligation. The rationale for using the
accumulated benefit obligation is that if the liability was to be settled immediately, then it would
be settled on the basis of present salary rates and non future salary rates.
If a liability for accrued pension cost is already reported in the accounts then only additional
liability to equal the minimum liability (unfunded accumulated benefit) is recorded.
OTHER CONCEPTS
If the amount funded (paid in cash) by the employer to the pension trust is less than the
annual expense (pension expense) the difference is accrued as a liability and treated as a
non-current liability. It may be described liability for pension expense not funded or due
to pension fund or accrued pension cost. The liability would be classified as current when
it requires the disbursement of cash in the next year.
If the amount funded (paid) to the pension trust during the period is greater than the
amount charged as expense, the difference is treated as assets. The asset reported as
prepaid pension cost or deferred pension expense is the current assets section if it is
current in nature.
If the accumulated benefit obligation exceeds the fair value of the pension plan assets, an
additional liability is recorded. The debt is either to an intangible asset account called
deferred pension cost or to a contra account to shareholders equity. If the debt is greater
than the unrecognized prior service cost, it is reported as intangible asset. If the debt is
greater than the unrecognized prior service cost, the excess debit is recorded as contra
equity and described as excess of additional pension liability over unrecognized prior
service cost.
- Less, FV on the statement of financial position date of plan asset (if any) out of which
the obligations are to be settled directly
ii) PV of any economic benefits available in the form of refunds from the plan or
reductions in future contribution to the plan. The PV of these economic benefits shall
be determined using the discounting rate method.
EAXMPLE:
A defined benefit obligation has the following characteristics.
Ksh ‗millions‘
PV of obligation 880
FV of plan asset 952
Unrecognized actuarial losses 88
Unrecognized past service cost 56
Unrecognized liability 40
PV of the available refunds and Reductions in future contribution 72
Since the amount is negative, the asset needs to be recognized as follows using asset ceiling test.
Step 1:
Determine net accumulative unrecognized service gain/loss at the beginning of year.
Step 2:
Determine corridor which is the greater of;
- 10% of PV of defined benefit obligation at the beginning
Step 3:
If step2 is greater than step 1, the amount is within the corridor and there is no need to recognize
any amortization.
If step 1 is greater than step 2 then the excess of 1 over 2 is dividend by the remaining work life
of employees in the plan and is recognized as the gain or loss in the statement of cash inflow.
An entity may apply systematic methods to actuarial gains/losses even if they are within the
limits specified in the corridor concept. An entity adopting any systematic method will achieve
faster recognition of actuarial gains and losses in income statement.
The amount recognized in statement of cash inflow should be transferred to retained earnings
immediately. Reclassification of this amount from other accounts to income statement in the
subsequent years is not allowed.
Key issues in the determination of the method of accounting for retirement benefits in
respect of defined benefits plan.
If actuarial valuations are not frequent enough the figures for PV of benefit of obligations
and FV of plan assets may not be current enough to capture reality.
EXERCISE
QUESTION ONE
From the information below calculate the pension expense for the year 20x0
Solution:
Workings)
Solution:
QUESTION THREE
Solution:
Solution:
QUESTION FIVE
The following information relates to a company‘s defined benefit pension plan as at 1 st January
20x6
Determine the amount of actuarial gains to be recognized in the income statement for the year
ended 31st December 20x6.
Solution:
Corridor amortization
Unrecognized actuarial gains/losses = 200 000 (determine this first)
Compare with 10% PV obligation at start 10% of plan asset beginning
= 6 000
If unrecognized gains = 210 000(less than both)
=225 000+210 000
=246 000 (to be posted to SOFP)
QUESTION SIX
Tedcomp Limited prepares its financial statements on 30 September each year. The company makes
contribution to a defined plan for its employees. The company accounts for actuarial gains and losses
arising on these arrangements using the 10% corridor method.
Additional information:
1. At 1 October 2011, the plain obligation was sh.42 million and the fair value of the plan assets was
sh.36 million
Unrecognized actuarial losses at that date totaled sh.7.8 million.
2. The actuary advised that the current service cost for the year ended 30 September 2012 was sh.4.8
million. Tedcomp Limited paid contribution of sh.3.84 million to the plan on 30 September 2012.
These were the only contribution paid in the year.
3. The expected annual rate of return on plan assets at 1 October 2011 was 5%. They actuary revised
this estimate to 4% at 30 September 2012
4. The appropriate annual rate at which to discount the plan liabilities was 6% on 1 October 2011
and 5.5% on 30 September 2012
5. The plan paid our benefits totaling sh.2.4 million to retired members on 30 September 2012
6. At 30September 2012 the plan obligation was sh.49.8 millions and the fair value of the plan asset
was sh.39 million
7. The average remaining service life of plan members still in employment was estimated to be 20
years.
Tedcom Limited policy is to recognize the excess of the limits over the average service life of
employees.
Required:
(i) Income statement (extract) for the year ended 30 September 2012 (5 marks)
(ii) Statement of financial position (extract) as at 30 September 2012 (5 marks)
(Total: 10 marks)
Solution:
Obligation:
PV of obligation at beginning 42 000 000
Add: Service cost 4 800 000
Interest cost for period 2 520 000
Less: benefits paid (2 400 000)
Actual present value of plan obligation 46 920 000
Gain on actuarial assumption (balancing figure) 2 880 000
PV of obligation at end of year 49 800 000
Corridor amortization:
Unrecognized actuarial gains/losses 7 800 000
Compare with:
10% of PV of obligation at the start (10%x36) 3 600 000
10% of PV of plan asset at beginning (10%x42) 4 200 000 4 200 000
Unrecognized actuarial gain 3 600 000
3 600 000
Out of corridor amortization = = 180 000 (to be posted to income statement)
20
Tedcomp Limited
income statement (extract) for the year ended 30 September 2012
Sh.‘000‘
Current service cost 4,800
Interest cost (6% x 42,000) 2,520
Recognized actuarial losses 180
Less: Expected return on plan assets (5% x 36,000) (1,800)
5,700
August 2015 www.fb.com/kasnebcsia
69
Tedcomp Limited
statement of financial position (extract) for the year ended 30 September 2012
Sh.‘000‘
Estimated benefit obligation 49,800
Estimated plan assets 39,000
Unrecognized losses (10,740)
Net benefit obligation 60
QUESTION SEVEN
Given below are the beginning balances of respective years‘ present for the projected benefit
obligation and market-related values for the pension plan assets.
Projected benefit obligation Plan asset value
1999 1,200,000 1,900,000
The average remaining service per employee in 1999 and 2000 was 10 years and in 2001 and
2002 was 12years. The unrecognized net gain or loss that occurred during each year is as follows
Required: using the corridor approach, compute the amount of unrecognized net gain or loss
amortized and charge to pension expenses in each of the four years
QUESTION EIGHT
From the following information concerning the pension fund of some company, calculate the
amounts to be reported in the balance sheets as the end of each of the three years.
EPS is the average of earnings attributed to every individual shareholder by equity holder
For the purpose of calculating basic EPS, the profit or loss for the period should be the profit or
loss attributable to shareholders in the present company less dividends on the irredeemable
preference shares and any shares with a prior claim. (Dividends on redeemable/convertible
preference shares are classified as part of finance charges and deducted in arriving at the profit
before tax)
Earnings should be apportioned over the weighted average equity shares capital (i.e. taking
account of the date any new shares are issued during the year)
Bonus issue
A bonus issue (or capitalization issue or scrip issue) does not provide additional resources to the
issuer and it means the shareholder owns the same proportion of the business before and after the
issue.
In calculating EPS, the bonus shares are deemed to have been issued at the start of the year and
comparative figures are restated to allow for the proportional increase in share capital caused by
the bonus issue.
Example:
A company makes a bonus issue of one new share for every five existing shares held on 1 st July
2012.
2012 2011
s
Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders for year ending 31 December 550,000 460,000
Number of ordinary shares in issue at 31st 1,200,000 1,000,000
2011
460,000
= 38.3
1,200,000
2012
550,000
= 45.8
1,200,000
Rights issue
A rights issue is an issue of new shares to existing shareholders a price below the current market
value.
Rights issue contributes additional resources and its normally priced below full market price. To
arrive at figures for EPS when rights issue is made, we need to calculate first of all the
theoretical ex-rights price
Example:
Suppose that Egghead Company has 10,000 shares in issue. It is now proposed to make a 1 for 4
rights issue at a price of ksh.3 per share. The market value of existing shares on the final day
before the issue is made is ksh.3.50 (this is the ―cum rights‖ value). What is the theoretical ex-
rights price per share?
Kshs
Before issue 4 shares, value ksh 3.50 14
Rights issue 1 share, value 3 3
Theoretical value of 5 share 17
17
Theoretical ex-rights price ksh share = Kshs 3.40 per share
5
Procedure for calculating EPS for current year and corresponding figure for the previous year in
rights issue
a) The EPS for corresponding previous period should be multiplied by the fraction
ii. Multiply the number of shares after the rights issue by the fraction of the year
after the date of issue and add to the figure arrived in (i).
The total earnings should then be dividend by the total number of shares so calculated.
Example:
Brains Company had 100,000 shares in issue, and then makes a 1 for 5 rights issue on October 1st
20x2 at a price $1. The market value on the last day of quotation cum rights $1.60. Calculate the
EPS for 20x2 and the corresponding figure for 20x1 given total earnings of $50,000 in 20x2 and
$ 40,000 in 20x1. Assume December 31st year end.
1.50𝑥40𝑐𝑡𝑠
𝐸𝑃𝑆 = = 37.5𝑐𝑡𝑠
1.60
(This is the corresponding value for 20x1 which will be shown in the income statement for brains
co. at the end of 20x2)
Shares
9 1.6
Step 1, 100,000𝑥 12 𝑥 1.50 = 80,000
3
Step 2, 120,000 𝑥 = 30,000
12
Convertibles
The principles of convertible bonds and convertible preference shares are similar.
If the convertible bonds/preference shares have been converted:
The interest/dividend would be saved therefore earnings would be higher
The number of shares would increase.
Solution:
Steps
a) Determine how much the shareholders will pay for at the option price.
b) Determine how many shares the shareholder will receive if the shares were bought at
market price (fair value)
c) Determine the shares issued for free and add this to existing shares to arrive at total
assumed shares hence calculate diluted earnings per share.
Calculations:
1) Options 920,000𝑥1.70 = $1,564,000
1,564 ,000
2) At fair value, the shares bought with $1,564,000 are = 868,889
1.80
3) Number of shares issued free 920,000 − 868,889
4) Total shares for calculating DEPS 8,280,000 + 51,000 = 8,331,111
2,208 ,000
5) DEPS=8,331 ,111 = 26.5 𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑎𝑟𝑒
Disclosure of EPS
The following information should be disclosed for both basic and diluted EPS:
The profit or loss used as numerator and reconciliation of those amounts to the net profit
or loss for the period
The weighted average number of ordinary shares used as the denominator and a
reconciliation of the denominator to each other
2. EPS shows the amount of earnings available to each ordinary shareholder. It indicates the
potential return on individual investments.
August 2015 www.fb.com/kasnebcsia
76
Importance of diluted earnings per share
1. It shows what the current years EPS would be if all the dilutive potential ordinary shares
in issue had been converted.
2. It can be used to asses trends in the past performance
3. In theory, it serves as a warning to equity share holders that the return on their investment
may fall in future periods
Limitations of EPS
(a) It does not take into account of inflation. Apparent growth in earnings may not be real.
(b) It is based on historical information therefore does not necessarily have predictive value
(c) An entity‘s earnings are affected by the choice of the accounting policies. Therefore it
may not always be appropriate to compare EPS of different companies
(d) DEPS is only an additional measure of past performance despite looking at future
potential shares.
Many entities produce and market a variety of products and services and also operate in many
geographical areas of the world. Each of these products and geographical areas are naturally
subject to different rates of profitability, risks, opportunities etc.
The objective of IFRS 8 is to establish principles for reporting financial information by the
segment. An example of a company operating segment is General electric which has the
following segments: commercial finance, healthcare products, industrial products, infrastructure,
NBC universal etc
IFRS8 operating segment requires particular classes of entities (essentially those with publicly
traded securities) to disclose information about their operating segments, products and services,
the geographical areas in which they operate, and their major customers. Information is based on
internal management reports, both in the identification of operating segments and measurement
of disclosed segment information.
Scope of IFRS 8
IFRS 8 applies to the separate or individual financial statements of an entity (and to the
consolidated financial statements of a group with a parent):
Operating segments
That engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses
(including revenues and expenses relating to transactions with other components of the
same entity)
whose operating results are reviewed regularly by the entity's chief operating decision
maker to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its
performance and
for which discrete financial information is available
Reportable segments
An entity is required to report financial and descriptive information about its reportable
segments. Reportable segments are operating segments or aggregations of operating segments
that meet specified criteria for determining reportable segment
IFRS does not set on the number of reportable segment an entity should report on.
In order to establish whether a segment is reportable segment, the standard suggests using a
quantitative threshold. A reporting segment may come up applying aggregation criteria.
a) Quantitative threshold
Segments must be reported on separately if they meet any of the following criteria
i. Reported revenue (internal and external) is more than 10 % of the combined revenue
(internal and external) of all operating segments.
ii. The absolute measure of its reported profit or loss is 10 % or more of the greater, in
absolute amount, of
the combined reported profit of all operating segments that did not report a loss and
the combined reported loss of all operating segments that reported a loss; or
iii. Assets are 10 % or more of the combined assets of all operating segments.
The reportable segment should report at least 75% of the entity‘s revenue.
IFRS 8 does not define ―Total revenue‖. However, the total entity revenue should be interpreted
as the entity‘s external revenue; the additional segments are required to be reported until 75%
criteria is fulfilled.
b) Aggregation criteria
Operating segments can be combined if they have similar economic characteristics. Two or more
operating segments can be aggregated into one single operating segment if aggression is
consistent with the core principles of IFRS 8, the segments have similar characteristics, and the
segments are similar in each of the following characteristics:
Segments that do not individually exceed the 10% threshold limit may be aggregate:
Disclosure requirements
1. general information
The various factors used to identify the reportable segments. For example geographical
area or differences in products
The types of products and services from which each operating segment derives its
revenues
2. Information about the reported segment profit or loss, including certain specified
revenues and expenses included in segment profit or loss, segment assets and segment
liabilities, and the basis of measurement
Question one:
Bridgeview had the following capital and reserves on 1st January 2009
Ksh
Share capital (Kshs 1 Ordinary shares) 7,000,000
Share premium 900,000
Revaluation reserve 500,000
Retained earnings 9,000,000
Shareholders‘ funds 17,400,000
Bridgeview issues 2 Millions Kshs 1 ordinary share on 1st April 2009. Bridgeview‘s results are
as follows:
Profit after tax for 2009 was Kshs 1,150,000
Calculate basic earnings per share for 2009.
Question two:
On December 31st 20x1, the issued share capital of Rafiki enterprises consisted of 4,000,000
ordinary shares of Kshs 25 each and the shares were quoted at ksh.50 per share. Its trading
results for the last two years were as follows:
Profit after tax for 20x1 was Kshs 3,200,000 and 4,250,000 for 20x2
Show the calculation of the basic EPS to be presented in the financial for the year ended 31st
December 20x2, including comparative figures.
Question three:
A company had 8.28 million shares in issue at the start of the year and made no issue of shares
during the year ended 31 st December 20x4, but on that date it had in issue $2,300,000. 10%
convertible loan stock 20x6 – 20x9. Assume a corporation tax rate of 30%. The earning for the
year was $2,208,000. The loan stock will be convertible into ordinary $1 share as follows.
Calculate the fully diluted EPS for the year ended 31st December 20x4.
Question four:
On 31st December 20x0 a company had in issue 8,000,000 ordinary shares of Kshs 10 each, On
January 1st of 20x1, the company issued 10%, 10,000,000 preference shares of Kshs 10 each.
Calculate the fully diluted earnings per share at end of December 20x1.
QUESTION
The following information is extracted from the books of Viwanda for the year ended 31
ended March 2004:
Sh‖Million‖ Sh‖Million‖
Sales:
Food products 5 650
Plastic and packaging 625
Pharmaceutical 345
Others 162 6 782
Expenses:
Food products 3 335
Plastic and packaging 425
Pharmaceutical 222
Others 200 4 182
Other items:
General operating expenses 562
Income from investments 132
Interest expenses 65
Identifiable assets:
Food products 7 320
Plastic and packaging 1 320
Pharmaceutical 1 050
Others 665 10 355
General assets: 722
Additional information:
1. Inter-segment sales for the year ended 31 March 2004, were as follows:
Sh‖Million‖
Food products 55
Plastic and packaging 72
Pharmaceutical 21
Others 7
2. Operating profit includes sh. 33 000 000 on intersegment sales
Viwanda ltd
Segment report for the year ended 31st march 2004
Food Plastics & Pharma- others Interseg- Consolidated
products packaging ceuticals mentation figures
Sh `m` Sh `m` Sh `m` Sh `m` Sh `m` Sh `m`
Revenues:
Sales to unaffiliated customer 5 595 553 324 155 6 627
Intersegment sales 55 72 21 7 155
Total revenue 5 650 625 345 162 155 6 627
Segment expenses (3 335) (425) (222) (200) (122) (4 060)
Operating profit 2 315 200 123 (38) 33 2 567
Other items:
General corporate expenses (562)
Income from investments 132
Interest expenses (65)
Income:continuing operation 2 072
Identifiable assets 7 320 1 320 1 050 665 10 355
General corporate assets 722
Total assets 11 077
1) Use of common size financial statements where all the accounts heading are expressed in
terms of percentages.
2) Use of ratios will also make even financials of companies of different sizes comparable.
There is however adjustments which are necessary owing to different accounting policies of
companies or practices which may emanate from the management and directors deliberate
attempt to manipulate accounts.
3) Revaluation of assets may be necessary to reflect their true value and the same time
reflect the true year‘s depreciation. For comparison is made possible.
4) Allowance need to be made for uncollectible accounts to reflect the true value of
collectible accounts
Intercorporate investments are undertaken when companies invest in the equity or debt of other
firms. The reasons behind why one company would invest in another are many, but could
include:
50% O .S. C
B
THE FIRM
<50% but>=20% O.S.C
<20% O. S. C
D
NOTE;
At acquisition, the assets (investment in investee) are recorded on the investing firm's
(investor) balance sheet at fair value. As time elapses and the fair value of the assets
changes, the accounting treatment will be dependent upon the classification of the assets.
Assets are classified as:
Held-to-Maturity
These are debt securities intended to be held till maturity. Long-term securities will be
reported at amortized cost on the balance sheet, with interest income being reported on
the investee's income statement.
Held-for-Trading
Equity and debt securities held with the intent to be sold for a profit (hopefully) within a
short time-horizon, typically three months. They are reported on the balance sheet at fair
value, with any fair value changes (realized and unrealized) being reported on the income
statement, along with any interest or dividend income.
Available-for-Sale
These are neither held-to-maturity nor held-for-trading. Available-for-sale securities are
similar to held-for-trading securities, however only realized changes in fair value are
reported on the income statement (along with dividend and interest income), with all
unrealized changes being reported as a component of shareholders' equity on the balance
sheet.
The choice of classification is an important factor when analyzing financial asset investments. A
firm that classifies securities as held-for-trading would report higher earnings if the fair value of
the investment rises than if it had classified the investment as held-for-sale, since unrealized fair
value changes in held-for-trading securities are reported on the firm's income statement, while a
similar change in held-for-sale securities would be reported in shareholders' equity. Additionally,
GAAP does not allow firms to reclassify investments which have been originally classified as
August 2015 www.fb.com/kasnebcsia
87
held-for-trading or designated as fair value investments. So the accounting choices made by
investing companies when making investments in financial assets can have a major effect on its
financial statements.
Investments in Associates
An investment in an associate is typically an ownership interest of between 20-50%. Although
the investment would generally be regarded as non-controlling, such an ownership stake would
be considered influential, due to the investor's ability to influence the investee's managerial team,
corporate plan and policies along with the possibility of representation on the investee's board of
directors.
The equity method also calls for the recognition of goodwill paid by the investor at acquisition,
with goodwill defined as any premium paid over and above the book value of the investee's
identifiable assets. Additionally, the investment must also be tested periodically for impairment.
If the fair value of the investment falls below the recorded balance sheet value (and is considered
permanent), the asset must be written-down. A joint venture, whereby two or more firms share
control of an entity, would also be accounted for using the equity method.
A major factor that must also be considered for the purpose of investments in associates is
intercorporate transactions. Since such an investment is accounted for under the equity method,
transactions between the investor and the investee can have a significant impact on both
companies' financials. For, upstream (investee to investor) and downstream (investor to
investee), the investor must account for its proportionate share of the investee's profits from any
intercorporate transactions.
Keep in mind that these treatments are general guidelines and not hard rules. A company that
exhibits significant influence over an investee with an ownership stake of less than 20% should
be classified as an investment in an associate. While a company with a 20-50% stake that does
not show any signs of significant influence could be classified as only having an investment in
financial assets.
Merger – The acquiring firm absorbs the acquired firm, which from acquisition will
cease to exist.
Acquisition – The acquiring firm along with the newly acquired firm continue to exist,
typically in parent-subsidy roles.
Special Purpose Entities – An entity typically created by a sponsoring firm for a single
purpose or project.
When accounting for business combinations the acquisition method is used. Under the
acquisition method, both the companies' assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses are combined.
If the ownership stake of the parent company is less than 100%, it is necessary to record a
minority interest account on the balance sheet to account for the amount of the subsidiary not
controlled by the acquiring firm.
The purchase price of the subsidiary is recorded at cost on the parent's balance sheet, with any
goodwill (purchase price over book value) being reported as an unidentifiable asset. In a case
where the fair value of the subsidiary falls below the carrying value on the parent's balance sheet,
an impairment charge must be recorded and reported on the income statement.
Conclusion
when examining the financial statements of companies with intercorporate investments, it is
important to watch for accounting treatments or classifications that do not seem to fit the
actualities of the business relationship. While such instances shouldn't automatically be looked at
as "tricky accounting," being able to understand how the accounting classification effects a
company's financial statements is an important part of financial analysis.
A subsidiary company is a company in which the investing company (also called parent or parent
company) controls the financial and operating policies of the subsidiary company.
In most cases, control is evidenced (but not limited) to owning more than 50% of the ordinary
share capital of the subsidiary company. Control may also be exercised in the following ways;
i) The parent company owning more than 50% or the voting rights in the company or
subsidiary company.
ii) The parent company being able to appoint majority of the directors in the board of directors.
August 2015 www.fb.com/kasnebcsia
89
iii) The parent company carrying out favourable transactions with the subsidiary e.g. sale and
purchase of goods at a price below the market value.
The substance of the relationship between parent company and subsidiary company is the
effectively, the parent company controls the subsidiary company. This means that the parent
company controls the assets of the subsidiary company and is liable to the debts of the subsidiary
company.
1AS 27 therefore requires that the parent a company should include the financial results of the
subsidiary company in its own financial statements. The process involves adding the assets,
liabilities and incomes and expenses of the subsidiary company to those of the parent company
while excluding inter-company transactions and balances. This process is called consolidation
and the combined financial statements are called Group accounts or consolidated accounts.
1AS 27/IAS 1 requires the parent company to present the following in its published financial
statements.
1AS 27 also requires the parent company to present its own financial statements separately i.e.
excluding the subsidiary company.
GROUP STRUCTURES
A group structure is the relationship between the parent company and its subsidiaries. There are
normally four main types of group structures (apart from the parent company and one subsidiary)
i.e.
Definition:
IAS 27 consolidated and separate financial statements use the following definitions:
Subsidiary – An entity that is controlled by another entity (known as parent)
Control – the power to govern the financial operating policies of an entity so as to benefit from
its activities.
Control is usually based on ownership of more than 50% of voting power, but other forms of
control are possible.
Answer to Example
i. It is the voting share that gives Z the influence on west. Z should control west in this
case. West will therefore be treated as a subsidiary because Z owns 60% of the voting
shares in west.
ii. As Z has less than 50% of the voting shares this time Z will not probably nor be able to
control west therefore west will not be treated as a subsidiary
IAS 27 requires that consolidated financial statements shall include all subsidiary of the parent.
The two exceptions to these rules are:
1. Lack of effective control – the excluded should be accounted for as an investment in
accordance with IAS 39
Subsidiary held for resale – held for resale subsidiary is treated as a current asset investment
and valued at lower of the carrying amount and fair value less cost to sell
Principles of consolidation
Related parties
Two parties are considered related if
1. One party has the ability to control the other party or
2. One party has the ability to exercise significant influence over the other party or
3. The parties are under common control. Therefore
1. A company that is a subsidiary is a related party of its parent company
2. This means that the financial statement may have been affected by related party
transactions
Types of transactions that may occur between the parent and subsidiary (related parties) and their
impact on the financial statements of the individual company and the group are:
IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures requires disclosures about transactions and outstanding
balances with an entity's related parties. The standard defines various classes of entities and
people as related parties and sets out the disclosures required in respect of those parties,
including the compensation of key management personnel.
IAS 24 was reissued in November 2009 and applies to annual periods beginning on or after 1
January 2011.
Summary of IAS 24
Objective
The objective of IAS 24 is to ensure that an entity's financial statements contain the disclosures
necessary to draw attention to the possibility that its financial position and profit or loss may
have been affected by the existence of related parties and by transactions and outstanding
balances with such parties.
A related party is a person or entity that is related to the entity that is preparing its financial
statements (referred to as the 'reporting entity') [IAS 24.9].
(a) A person or a close member of that person's family is related to a reporting entity if
that person:
(b) An entity is related to a reporting entity if any of the following conditions applies:
(i) The entity and the reporting entity are members of the same group (which
means that each parent, subsidiary and fellow subsidiary is related to the others).
(iii) Both entities are joint ventures of the same third party.
(iv) One entity is a joint venture of a third entity and the other entity is an
associate of the third entity.
(v) The entity is a post-employment defined benefit plan for the benefit of
employees of either the reporting entity or an entity related to the reporting entity.
If the reporting entity is itself such a plan, the sponsoring employers are also
related to the reporting entity.
(vii) A person identified in (a)(i) has significant influence over the entity or is a
member of the key management personnel of the entity (or of a parent of the
entity).
(viii) The entity, or any member of a group of which it is a part, provides key
management personnel services to the reporting entity or to the parent of the
reporting entity*.
* Requirement added by Annual Improvements to IFRSs 2010–2012 Cycle, effective for annual
periods beginning on or after 1 July 2014.
two entities simply because they have a director or key manager in common
two venturers who share joint control over a joint venture
providers of finance, trade unions, public utilities, and departments and agencies of a
government that does not control, jointly control or significantly influence the reporting
entity, simply by virtue of their normal dealings with an entity (even though they may
affect the freedom of action of an entity or participate in its decision-making process)
a single customer, supplier, franchiser, distributor, or general agent with whom an entity
transacts a significant volume of business merely by virtue of the resulting economic
dependence
Relationships between parents and subsidiaries. Regardless of whether there have been
transactions between a parent and a subsidiary, an entity must disclose the name of its parent
and, if different, the ultimate controlling party. If neither the entity's parent nor the ultimate
controlling party produces financial statements available for public use, the name of the next
most senior parent that does so must also be disclosed. [IAS 24.16]
Management compensation. Disclose key management personnel compensation in total and for
each of the following categories: [IAS 24.17]
Key management personnel are those persons having authority and responsibility for planning,
directing, and controlling the activities of the entity, directly or indirectly, including any directors
(whether executive or otherwise) of the entity. [IAS 24.9]
If an entity obtains key management personnel services from a management entity, the entity is
not required to disclose the compensation paid or payable by the management entity to the
management entity‘s employees or directors. Instead the entity discloses the amounts incurred by
the entity for the provision of key management personnel services that are provided by the
separate management entity*. [IAS 24.17A, 18A]
Related party transactions. If there have been transactions between related parties, disclose the
nature of the related party relationship as well as information about the transactions and
outstanding balances necessary for an understanding of the potential effect of the relationship on
the financial statements. These disclosure would be made separately for each category of related
parties and would include: [IAS 24.18-19]
Good will on consolidation arises when the purchase consideration paid by the holding company
is different from the value of the net assets acquired in the subsidiary company.
If purchase consideration is more than net assets acquired, then the difference is positive
goodwill and if purchase considered is less than net assets acquired, then the difference is
negative goodwill.
Goodwill will thus be computed in the following two ways;
Method1.
Partial Goodwill (old method)
£
Cost of investment in subsidiary xx
Less: share of net assets acquired (on date of acquisition) (x)
xx/(xx)
Method 2
Full goodwill (new method)
£ £
Cost of investment in subsidiary xx
less: Ordinary share capital of subsidiary xx
Goodwill-parents share xx
Fair value of NCI xx
less: Non-controlling share of net assets of acquisition (xx)
Goodwill - NCI xx
Total goodwill xx
NOTE: Total assets less total liabilities i.e. net assets are the same as shareholders funds. The
most common approach used in computing goodwill is by preparing an account called cost of
control whereby the cost of investment is posted on the debit side and the parent company share
of the ordinary share capital, capital reserves and revenue reserves on the date of acquisition in
the subsidiary company are posted on the credit side. The balancing figure in that account is
goodwill.
Example:
Mzalendo acquired 80% of the ordinary share capital of KANU on 31December 20x7 for
$78,000. At this date, net assets of KANU were $85,000. What is the goodwill that arose on the
acquisition?
i. If the NCI is valued using the proportion of net assets mentioned
ii. If the NCI is valued using the full goodwill method and the fair value of NCI on the
acquisition dates is $21,000
Answer:
i) Purchase consideration 78,000
Share of subsidiaries assets (80%x85,000) (68,000)
Goodwill arising 10,000
Steps in consolidation:
i) Establish the groups structure i.e. the percentage ownership by the parent company.
ii) Establish subsidiary‘s net assets at date of acquisition and net asset at reporting date
iii) Calculate goodwill
iv) Establish non-controlling interest
v) Establish parent retained earnings and parent share of subsidiary past acquisition retained
earnings.
Retained profits ideally should be the amounts that can be distributed as dividends.
Therefore, in arriving at group retained profits, careful attention should be paid to the profits
of the subsidiary company. All the profits of the parent company can be distributed or are
distributable.
However, the subsidiaries profits belong to both the parent company and the Non-controlling
interest. Thus the share that belongs to the Non-controlling interest will be transferred to the
Non-controlling interest‘s account.
The remaining profits that belong to the parent company should be split between pre-
acquisition profits and post acquisition profits.
The pre acquisition profits are the profits in the subsidiary company on the date of
acquisition and are thus used in computing goodwill.
The post acquisition profits relate to the period after acquisition and can thus be distributed
or can be paid out to the shareholders of the parent company. They should thus form part of
the group retained profits.
£
Parent company‘s retained profits x
Add: Parent company‘s share of post acquisition retained profits In x
subsidiary company
xx
When the parent company owns less than 100% of the ordinary share capital of the
subsidiary company then the other balance is held by Non-controlling interest. Therefore if
the parent company owns 80% of the ordinary share capital of the subsidiary then the Non-
controlling interest owns 20%. The Non-controlling interest (NCI) should be shown
separately in the consolidated statement of financial position but as part of shareholders
funds and the figure to appear in the statement of financial position will be made up of the
following.
Current accounts
Sometimes the parent and subsidiary will trade with each other on credit, leading to a receivable
(current), in one company‘s SOFP and payables, (current) in the other company‘s SOFP
These amounts owed in the group rather than outside the group and therefore they must not
appear in the consolidated statement of financial position. They are therefore cancelled against
each other on consolidation.
Cash/goods in transit
At the year end, current accounts may not agree owing to the existence of goods in transit items
such as goods or cash.
The accounting treatment is as follows:
i. If the goods or cash are in transit between parent and subsidiary make the adjusting entry
to the SOFP of the recipient.
Dr. Inventory
Cr. Payable current account
Once in agreement, the current accounts may be crossed and cancelled as part of the process of
cross costing the assets and liabilities
This means therefore those reconciled current accounts are removed from both receivables and
payables in the consolidated statement of financial position.
Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the consideration transferred and amount of any non-
controlling interest over the net of the acquisition date identifiable assets acquired and liabilities
assumed.
Treatment of Goodwill
Positive goodwill:
i. Goodwill is capitalized as an intangible non-current asset
ii. Goodwill is tested annually for possible impairment
iii. Amortization of goodwill is not permitted by the standard
Negative goodwill:
It arises when the cost of the investment is less than the value of net assets purchased.
Most likely reasons for negative goodwill is misstatement of the fair values of assets and
liabilities and accordingly the standard requires that the calculation be reviewed.
After such review any negative goodwill remaining is credited directly to statement of
comprehensive income.
IFRS 3 revised, requires that subsidiary‘s assets and liabilities be recorded at their fair value for
the purpose of the calculation of goodwill and production of consolidated accounts.
Adjustments will therefore be required where the subsidiary‘s accounts themselves do not reflect
fair value
Question:
ABC purchased 60% of the ordinary share in sasha on 31 st December 2009 for Ksh.10,000,000
cash. At the date the SOFP of sasha showed net assets of Ksh.9,000,000 further investigations
revealed that the land held at cost of Ksh.1,700,000 had a market value of Ksh.4,000,000
What is the goodwill arising on acquisition using the proportion of net assets method?
Solution:
(b) Accounts and relates partly to the group and partly to NCI (if any)
Adjustments are:
Example:
Suppose P owns 90% of S. During the year S sold goods to P at a cost plus 25%, at year
end closing inventory of P includes 800,000 of goods at invoice value acquired originally
from S. what adjustment are required in the consolidation working papers.
Answer:
Unrealized profit is 25/125 x 800,000 = 160,000
Journal entry is
Dr. Consolidated retained earnings 144,000
Dr. NCI 16,000
Cr. Consolidated inventory 160,000
If one group member sells non-current assets to another group member the adjustment must be
made to recreate the situation that would have existed if the sale had not occurred (there would
have been no profit on the sale and depreciation would have been based on the original cost of
the assets of the group)
Adjustment for unrealized profit in the non-current assets
The easiest way to calculate the adjustment requires is to compare the carrying value (CV) of the
assets now with the CV that it would have held had the transfer not occurred:
If the parent company acquires the subsidiary during the year, the net assets of the date of
acquisition must be calculated based at the start of the subsidiaries financial year plus the profit
of up to the date of acquisition. It is normally assumed that the subsidiary profit after tax accrues
evenly over time.
Non-controlling interest
This is calculated as NCI% x subsidiary profit after tax (taken from subsidiary column of
consolidation schedule)
Dividends
- A payment of a dividend by subsidiary to a parent need to be cancelled
- Only dividends paid by parents to its own shareholders appear in the consolidated
financial statements
- Any dividend income shown in the consolidated income statement must arise from
investment in other than those in subsidiary associates
- The non-controlling interest in the subsidiary is calculated on the profit after tax and
before dividends. The figure therefore includes the NCI share of subsidiary dividends and
subsidiary earnings.
Fair values
If a depreciating non-current asset is revalued as part of fair value exercise when calculating
goodwill, these will result in an adjustment to the consolidated income statement.
The consolidated income statement income statement must include a depreciation charge based
on the fair value of the asset, included in the consolidated statement of financial position.
Extra depreciation must therefore be calculated charged to an appropriate cost category within
the consolidation schedule.
The deductions of intragroup sales in both cases should be shown in the adjustments column of
the consolidation schedules
Inventory
- If any goods sold intragroup are included in closing inventory, their values must be
adjusted to the lower of cost and net realizable value (NRV)
- The adjustment for unrealized profit should be shown as an increase to the cost of sales in
the sellers column in the consolidation schedule
Interests
If loans are outstanding between two group companies, intragroup loan interest will be paid and
received.
Both the loan and interest must be excluded from the consolidated results. The relevant amount
of interest should be deducted from group investment income and group finance cost through the
adjustments column of the consolidated schedule
A parent need not present consolidated financial statements if and only if;
(a) The parent is itself a wholly owned subsidiary, or is a partially-owned subsidiary of
another entity and its other owners, including those not otherwise entitled to vote,
have been informed about, and do not object to, the parent not presenting
consolidated financial statements.
(b) The parent‘s debt or equity instruments are not traded in a public market (a domestic
or foreign stock exchange or an over-the-counter market, including local and regional
markets).
Note:
The standard does not require consolidation of a subsidiary acquired when there is
evidence that the control is intended to be temporary. However there must be evidence
that the subsidiary is acquired with the intention to dispose of it within twelve months
and that management is actively seeking a buyer. When a subsidiary previously excluded
from consolidated is not disposed of within twelve months it must be consolidated as
from the date of acquisition unless narrowly specified circumstances apply.
An entity is not permitted to exclude from consolidated an entity it continues to control
simply because that entity is operating under severe long-term restrictions that
significantly impair its ability to transfer funds to the parent. Control must be lost for
exclusion to occur.
A subsidiary is not excluded from consolidated simply because the investor is a venture
capital organization, mutual fund, unit trust or similar entity.
A subsidiary is not excluded from consolidated because its business activities are
dissimilar from those of the other entities within the group. Relevant information is
provided by consolidating such subsidiaries and disclosing additional information in the
consolidated financial statements about the different business activities of subsidiaries.
For example, the disclosure required by IAS 14 (segment reporting) help to explain the
significance of different business activities within the group.
Some of the reasons for exclusion are given under the companies Act but are now prohibited by
the standard.
In addition to the items discussed in topic one when we were preparing a statement of cash flow,
the following points need to be noted about preparation of consolidated cash flow statements.
i) Goodwill impaired for the year is a non-cash expense that should be added back to the group
profit before the tax.
ii) Where the group has investments in associate company then dividends received from
associate should be reported as a separate item under investing activities. The dividend to
be reported can be determined as follows.
The dividends paid to Minority interest (NCI) should also be disclosed separately from those of the holding
company and classified under financing activities
x x
Dickens acquired its 80% holding in Jones on January 1st 20x8 when Jones retained earnings
stood at $20,000. On this date, the fair value of 20% non-controlling interest shareholding was
$12,500.
Suggested Solution:
i. net assets
At acquisition At reporting
Share capital 20,000 20,000
Share premium 10,000 10,000
Retained earnings 20,000 25,000
50,000 55,000
ii. Goodwill
Question two:
Health ltd bought 90% of equity share capital of safety ltd at the begging of the year on January
1st 20x2 when the retained earnings of safety ltd stood at $5,000. Statement of financial position
at the year ended of 31 st December 20x3 is as follows (thousands of dollars)
S transferred goods to H at transfer price of $18,000 and mark-up of 50%. Two thirds of the
goods remained in inventory at the year end. The current account in the subsidiary and the parent
stood at $22,000 on that day. Goodwill has suffered an impairment of $10,000.
Prepare the consolidated statement of financial position on December 31 st 20x3. The non-
controlling interest is valued using the proportion of net assets method.
Suggested solution:
At acquisition At reporting
Share capital 5,000 31,000
Retained earnings 5,000 5,000
10,000 36,000
Journal entry:
Dr. R/E (group) 3,600
Dr. NCI 400
Cr. Inventory 4,000
Question three:
Hazelnut (H) acquired 80% of the share capital of peppermint (P) at the beginning of the year
where the reserve of P stood at $125,000. Hazelnut paid initial cash consideration of $1 million.
Additionally, H issued 200,000 shares with a nominal value of $1 and a current market value of
$1.8. It was agreed that H would pay a further $500,000 in three years time. Current interest rates
are 10% p.a. the appropriate discount factor for $1 receivable three years from now is 0.751. The
shares and contingent consideration have not yet been recorded.
Below are the statements of financial position of hazelnut (H) and peppermint (P) as at 31 st
December 20x4.
August 2015 www.fb.com/kasnebcsia
111
Hazelnut (H) Peppermint (P)
‗000‘ of dollars ‗000‘ of dollars
Investment in peppermint at cost 1,000
Non-current assets 5,500 1,500
Current assets
Inventory 550 100
Receivables 400 200
Cash 200 50
7,650 1,850
Equity and liabilities
share capital 2,000 500
Reserves (R/E) 1,400 300
Non-current liabilities 3,000 400
Current liabilities 1,250 650
7,650 1,850
At acquisition the fair value of peppermint‘s non-current assets exceeded their book value by
$200,000. They had a remaining useful life of 5 years at this date. The consolidated goodwill has
been impaired by one fifth of its value.
The Hazelnut group values the non-controlling interest using the full goodwill method. At the
date of acquisition the fair value of the 20% non-controlling interest was $380,000.
Workings:
i. group structure
At acquisition At reporting
Share capital 500 500
Retained earnings 125 300
FV adjustment 200 200
Depreciation adjustment (140)
825 960
iv.
Cost of investment 5,000
Cash 1,000
Shares (200x1.8) 360
Deferred payment 376
1,736
For 80% of P is investment (80% of 825) 660
Goodwill parents share 1076
FV of NCI at acquisition 380
Less: 20% of NA at acquisition (165)
Goodwill NCI share 215
Total goodwill 1,291
Impairment 20% or 1/5 258
Carrying goodwill 1,033
OVERVIEW
IAS 31 Interests in Joint Ventures sets out the accounting for an entity's interests in various forms of joint
ventures: jointly controlled operations, jointly controlled assets, and jointly controlled entities. The
standard permits jointly controlled entities to be accounted for using either the equity method or by
proportionate consolidation.
IAS 31 was reissued in December 2003, applies to annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2005,
and is superseded by IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements and IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities
with effect from annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013.
IAS 31 applies to accounting for all interests in joint ventures and the reporting of joint venture assets,
liabilities, income, and expenses in the financial statements of venturers and investors, regardless of the
structures or forms under which the joint venture activities take place, except for investments held by a
venture capital organization, mutual fund, unit trust, and similar entity that (by election or requirement)
are accounted for as under IAS 39 at fair value with fair value changes recognized in profit or loss. [IAS
31.1]
Key definitions
Joint venture: a contractual arrangement whereby two or more parties undertake an economic activity
that is subject to joint control.
Venturer: a party to a joint venture and has joint control over that joint venture.
Investor in a joint venture: a party to a joint venture and does not have joint control over that joint
venture.
Control: the power to govern the financial and operating policies of an activity so as to obtain benefits
from it.
Joint control: the contractually agreed sharing of control over an economic activity. Joint control exists
only when the strategic financial and operating decisions relating to the activity require the unanimous
consent of the venturers.
Jointly controlled operations involve the use of assets and other resources of the venturers rather than the
establishment of a separate entity. Each venturer uses its own assets, incurs its own expenses and
liabilities, and raises its own finance.
IAS 31 requires that the venturer should recognize in its financial statements the assets that it controls, the
liabilities that it incurs, the expenses that it incurs, and its share of the income from the sale of goods or
services by the joint venture. [IAS 31.15]
Jointly controlled assets involve the joint control, and often the joint ownership, of assets dedicated to the
joint venture. Each venturer may take a share of the output from the assets and each bears a share of the
expenses incurred. [IAS 31.18]
IAS 31 requires that the venturer should recognize in its financial statements its share of the joint assets,
any liabilities that it has incurred directly and its share of any liabilities incurred jointly with the other
venturers, income from the sale or use of its share of the output of the joint venture, its share of expenses
incurred by the joint venture and expenses incurred directly in respect of its interest in the joint venture.
[IAS 31.21]
A jointly controlled entity is a corporation, partnership, or other entity in which two or more venturers
have an interest, under a contractual arrangement that establishes joint control over the entity. [IAS 31.24]
Each venturer usually contributes cash or other resources to the jointly controlled entity. Those
contributions are included in the accounting records of the venturer and recognized in the venturer's
financial statements as an investment in the jointly controlled entity. [IAS 31.29]
IAS 31 allows two treatments of accounting for an investment in jointly controlled entities – except as
noted below:
Proportionate consolidation or equity methods are not required in the following exceptional
circumstances: [IAS 31.1-2]
Proportionate consolidation
Under proportionate consolidation, the balance sheet of the venturer includes its share of the assets that it
controls jointly and its share of the liabilities for which it is jointly responsible. The income statement of
the venturer includes its share of the income and expenses of the jointly controlled entity. [IAS 31.33]
The venturer may combine its share of each of the assets, liabilities, income and expenses
of the jointly controlled entity with the similar items, line by line, in its financial
statements; or
The venturer may include separate line items for its share of the assets, liabilities, income
and expenses of the jointly controlled entity in its financial statements.
Equity method
Procedures for applying the equity method are the same as those described in IAS 28 Investments in
Associates.
In the separate financial statements of the venturer, its interests in the joint venture should be: [IAS 31.46]
If a venturer contributes or sells an asset to a jointly controlled entity, while the assets are retained by the
joint venture, provided that the venturer has transferred the risks and rewards of ownership, it should
recognize only the proportion of the gain attributable to the other venturers. The venturer should
recognize the full amount of any loss incurred when the contribution or sale provides evidence of a
reduction in the net realizable value of current assets or an impairment loss. [IAS 31.48]
The requirements for recognition of gains and losses apply equally to non-monetary contributions unless
the gain or loss cannot be measured, or the other venturers contribute similar assets. Unrealized gains or
losses should be eliminated against the underlying assets (proportionate consolidation) or against the
investment (equity method). [SIC-13]
When a venturer purchases assets from a jointly controlled entity, it should not recognize its share of the
gain until it resells the asset to an independent party. Losses should be recognized when they represent a
reduction in the net realizable value of current assets or an impairment loss. [IAS 31.49]
An investor in a joint venture who does not have joint control should report its interest in a joint venture
in its consolidated financial statements either: [IAS 31.51]
in accordance with IAS 28 Investments in Associates – only if the investor has significant
influence in the joint venture; or
in accordance with IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.
If an investor loses joint control of a jointly controlled entity, it derecognizes that investment and
recognizes in profit or loss the difference between the sum of the proceeds received and any retained
interest, and the carrying amount of the investment in the jointly controlled entity at the date when joint
control is lost. [IAS 31.45]
Disclosure
Information about contingent liabilities relating to its interest in a joint venture. [IAS
31.54]
Information about commitments relating to its interests in joint ventures. [IAS 31.55]
A listing and description of interests in significant joint ventures and the proportion of
ownership interest held in jointly controlled entities. A venturer that recognizes its
interests in jointly controlled entities using the line-by-line reporting format for
proportionate consolidation or the equity method shall disclose the aggregate amounts of
each of current assets, long-term assets, current liabilities, long-term liabilities, income,
and expenses related to its interests in joint ventures. [IAS 31.56]
The method it uses to recognize its interests in jointly controlled entities. [IAS 31.57]
The summary below applies to IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures, issued in
May 2011 and applying to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013. For
earlier reporting periods, refer to our summary of IAS 28 Investments in Associates.
Objective of IAS 28
The objective of IAS 28 (as amended in 2011) is to prescribe the accounting for investments in associates
and to set out the requirements for the application of the equity method when accounting for investments
in associates and joint ventures. [IAS 28(2011).1]
Scope of IAS 28
IAS 28 applies to all entities that are investors with joint control of, or significant influence over, an
investee (associate or joint venture). [IAS 28(2011).2]
[IAS 28.3]
Significant influence
Where an entity holds 20% or more of the voting power (directly or through subsidiaries) on an investee,
it will be presumed the investor has significant influence unless it can be clearly demonstrated that this is
not the case. If the holding is less than 20%, the entity will be presumed not to have significant influence
unless such influence can be clearly demonstrated. A substantial or majority ownership by another
investor does not necessarily preclude an entity from having significant influence. [IAS 28(2011).5]
The existence of significant influence by an entity is usually evidenced in one or more of the following
ways: [IAS 28(2011).6]
The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible, including
potential voting rights held by other entities, are considered when assessing whether an entity has
significant influence. In assessing whether potential voting rights contribute to significant influence, the
entity examines all facts and circumstances that affect potential rights [IAS 28(2011).7, IAS 28(2011).8]
Basic principle. Under the equity method, on initial recognition the investment in an associate or a joint
venture is recognized at cost, and the carrying amount is increased or decreased to recognise the investor's
share of the profit or loss of the investee after the date of acquisition. [IAS 28(2011).10]
Distributions and other adjustments to carrying amount. The investor's share of the investee's profit
or loss is recognized in the investor's profit or loss. Distributions received from an investee reduce the
carrying amount of the investment. Adjustments to the carrying amount may also be necessary for
changes in the investor's proportionate interest in the investee arising from changes in the investee's other
comprehensive income (e.g. to account for changes arising from revaluations of property, plant and
equipment and foreign currency translations.) [IAS 28(2011).10]
Potential voting rights. An entity's interest in an associate or a joint venture is determined solely on the
basis of existing ownership interests and, generally, does not reflect the possible exercise or conversion of
potential voting rights and other derivative instruments. [IAS 28(2011).12]
Interaction with IFRS 9. IFRS 9 Financial Instruments does not apply to interests in associates and joint
ventures that are accounted for using the equity method. Instruments containing potential voting rights in
an associate or a joint venture are accounted for in accordance with IFRS 9, unless they currently give
access to the returns associated with an ownership interest in an associate or a joint venture. [IAS
28(2011).14]
Basic principle.
In its consolidated financial statements, an investor uses the equity method of accounting for investments
in associates and joint ventures. [IAS 28(2011).16] Many of the procedures that are appropriate for the
application of the equity method are similar to the consolidation procedures described in IFRS 10.
Furthermore, the concepts underlying the procedures used in accounting for the acquisition of a
subsidiary are also adopted in accounting for the acquisition of an investment in an associate or a joint
venture. [IAS 28.(2011).26]
An entity is exempt from applying the equity method if the investment meets one of the following
conditions:
Classification as held for sale. When the investment, or portion of an investment, meets the criteria to be
classified as held for sale, the portion so classified is accounted for in accordance with IFRS 5. Any
remaining portion is accounted for using the equity method until the time of disposal, at which time the
retained investment is accounted under IFRS 9, unless the retained interest continues to be an associate or
joint venture. [IAS 28(2011).20]
Use of the equity method should cease from the date that significant influence or joint control ceases:
[IAS 28(2011).22]
If the investment becomes a subsidiary, the entity accounts for its investment in
accordance with IFRS 3 Business Combinations and IFRS 10
If the retained interest is a financial asset, it is measured at fair value and subsequently
accounted for under IFRS 9
If an entity's interest in an associate or joint venture is reduced, but the equity method is continued to be
applied, the entity reclassifies to profit or loss the proportion of the gain or loss previously recognized in
other comprehensive income relative to that reduction in ownership interest. [IAS 28(2011).25]
Transactions with associates or joint ventures. Profits and losses resulting from upstream
(associate to investor, or joint venture to joint venturer) and downstream (investor to
associate, or joint venturer to joint venture) transactions are eliminated to the extent of
the investor's interest in the associate or joint venture. However, unrealized losses are not
eliminated to the extent that the transaction provides evidence of a reduction in the net
realizable value or in the recoverable amount of the assets transferred. Contributions of
non-monetary assets to an associate or joint venture in exchange for an equity interest in
the associate or joint venture are also accounted for in accordance with these
requirements. [IAS 28(2011).28-30]
Date of financial statements. In applying the equity method, the investor or joint venturer
should use the financial statements of the associate or joint venture as of the same date as
the financial statements of the investor or joint venturer unless it is impracticable to do
so. If it is impracticable, the most recent available financial statements of the associate or
joint venture should be used, with adjustments made for the effects of any significant
transactions or events occurring between the accounting period ends. However, the
difference between the reporting date of the associate and that of the investor cannot be
longer than three months. [IAS 28(2011).33, IAS 28(2011).34]
Accounting policies. If the associate or joint venture uses accounting policies that differ
from those of the investor, the associate or joint venture's financial statements are
adjusted to reflect the investor's accounting policies for the purpose of applying the
equity method. [IAS 28(2011).35]
Losses in excess of investment. If an investor's or joint venturer's share of losses of an
associate or joint venture equals or exceeds its interest in the associate or joint venture,
the investor or joint venturer discontinues recognizing its share of further losses. The
interest in an associate or joint venture is the carrying amount of the investment in the
associate or joint venture under the equity method together with any long-term interests
that, in substance, form part of the investor or joint venturer's net investment in the
associate or joint venture. After the investor or joint venturer's interest is reduced to zero,
a liability is recognized only to the extent that the investor or joint venturer has incurred
legal or constructive obligations or made payments on behalf of the associate. If the
associate or joint venture subsequently reports profits, the investor or joint venturer
August 2015 www.fb.com/kasnebcsia
122
resumes recognizing its share of those profits only after its share of the profits equals the
share of losses not recognized. [IAS 28(2011).38, IAS 28(2011).39]
Impairment. After application of the equity method an entity applies IAS 39 Financial Instruments:
Recognition and Measurement to determine whether it is necessary to recognize any additional
impairment loss with respect to its net investment in the associate or joint venture. If impairment is
indicated, the amount is calculated by reference to IAS 36 Impairment of Assets. The entire carrying
amount of the investment is tested for impairment as a single asset, that is, goodwill is not tested
separately. The recoverable amount of an investment in an associate is assessed for each individual
associate or joint venture, unless the associate or joint venture does not generate cash flows
independently. [IAS 28(2011).40, IAS 28(2011).42, IAS 28(2011).43]
An investment in an associate or a joint venture shall be accounted for in the entity's separate financial
statements in accordance with IAS 27 Separate Financial Statements (as amended in 2011).
Disclosure
There are no disclosures specified in IAS 28. Instead, IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities
outlines the disclosures required for entities with joint control of, or significant influence over, an
investee.
International accounting standards (IAS) 28’ investment in associates prescribes the use of
the equity method of accounting for investments in associates over which the investor has
significant influence
Required:
i) Describe the term “significant influence” in the context of IAS 28.
Suggested answer:
Where an investor holds directly or indirectly, 20% or more of the voting power of the investee,
it is presumed to have significant influences, unless it can be clearly demonstrated otherwise.
The existence of significant influence is usually evidenced in one or more of the following
ways:
- Representation on the board of directors
- Participation in policy-making process, including participation in decision about
dividends
- Material transactions between investor and investee
- Interchange of managerial personnel
- Provision of essential technical information
ii) Explain four circumstances under which the investor is exempted from use of
the equity method
Suggested answer:
- The investment is classified as held for sale
- The parent company is exempted from use of equity method
- the investment is wholly owned subsidiary, or it is a partially owned subsidiary of
another entity whose owners do not object to the investor not applying the equity method
and the following also apply:
The investor‘s debt or equity instrument are not traded in a public market
The investor did not file, nor is it in the process of filling its financial statements
with the stock exchange for purpose of issuing instruments in a public market
The intermediate or ultimate parent of the investor produces consolidated
financial statements which are available for public use and comply with
international finance reporting standards
Additional information:
1. Panther ltd. Acquired 80% of the ordinary shares of star ltd for sh.6, 800,000 on 1 July 2011.
Panther ltd also acquired 50% of the 10% loan notes of the company on the same date. The fair
value of the non-controlling interest was sh.1, 280,000.
2. On 1 July 2011, panther ltd. Further acquires 80,000 shares of the able ltd. At sh.55 per share.
3. The profit after tax of star ltd and able ltd. For the year ended 31 December 2011was
sh.1,000,000 and sh.6,00,000 respectively
4. On the date of acquisition, the fair values of the assets of star ltd. Were equal to their carrying
amounts except for the land and plant whose fair values were sh.200, 000 and sh.800, 000 in
excess of their carrying amounts respectively. Plant is to be depreciated on a prorate basis over
the remaining useful life of four years.
5. Panther ltd. Sold goods to star ltd. For sh.3, 000,000 at a mark-up of 50% in October 2011. Half
of these goods were included in the inventory of star ltd. as at 31 December 2011.
6. As at 31 December 2011. Star ltd. Owed Panther ltd. Sh.750,000
7. During the year Panther ltd. Sold goods to samba ltd, a company domiciled in Nigeria. The goods
were invoiced in Naira (Nr.) currency. The total value was shillings (ksh) 500,000 and the
exchange rate as at 31 December 2011 was 1 Ksh.=12.5Nr
Required:
Group statement of financial position as at 31 December 2011
Suggested solution:
Panther Ltd.
Group Statement of financial position as at 31 December2011
Sh.‖000‖ Sh.‖000‖
Non-current assets at cost:
Property, plant and equipment
15,150
Goodwill
1,880
Investment in associate company
5,500
Other investments(13 000-6 800-4 400-500)
1,300
23,830
Current assets:
Inventory (2 400+1 250-500) 3,150
Receivables (3 800+2 000-750-100) 4,950
Cash and bank balances (1 300+750) 2,050 10,150
Total assets 33,980
19 160
v. Non-controlling interest ( shareholders funds in star ltd +goodwill. Fair value on
acquisition (1 280+sharing post depreciation (20%x400) less impairment of goodwill
40=sh.1 320 000
Question:
H ltd. acquired 80% of the ordinary share capital of S ltd. on October 2009 for sh.2, 500 million.
One year later on 1 October 2010. H ltd. acquired 40% of the ordinary share capital of A ltd. for
sh.800 million. The statements of financial position of the three companies as at 30 September
2011 were as follows:
H ltd S ltd A ltd
Non-current assets at cost: Sh.‖ 000‖ Sh.‖000‖ Sh.‖ 000‖
Freehold property 2,560 1,400 800
Plant 1,420 900 540
Patents 250 420 -
Investments 3,450 200 60
7,680 2,920 1,400
Current assets:
Inventories 570 400 300
Receivables 420 380 400
Cash and bank balances - 150 120
990 930 820
8,670 3,850 2,220
Equity and liabilities:
Ordinary share capital(sh.10 each) 2,000 1,000 500
Share premium 1.000 500 100
Retained profits 4,500 1,900 1,200
7,500 3,400 1,800
Non-current liabilities:
Deferred tax 200 - 80
Current liabilities:
Bank overdraft 80 - -
Trade payables 750 450 280
Current tax 140 - 60
970 4 50 340
Total equity and liabilities 8,670 3,850 2,220
2. O 1 October 2009, the fair values of assets of S ltd. were equal to their book values
except for an item of plant whose fair value was sh.200 million more than its book value
3. During the year, M ltd. sold goods to A ltd. at a selling price of sh.140 million reporting a
profit of 40% on cost. A ltd‘s inventories as at 30 September 2011 included half of the
goods purchased from H ltd.
4. Included in the trade receivables of H ltd. is sh.120 million due from S ltd. included only
70 millions of this amount in its trade payables. The difference was due to some
administrative expenses charges to S ltd. by H ltd. which had not been accounted for by S
ltd.
5. As at 30 September 2011, 40% of the goodwill arising from arising of S ltd. had been
impaired. No impairment loss had arisen in A ltd. the group accounts for goodwill using
the partial method.
Required:
Group statement of financial position as at 30 September 2011
Workings:
i. Property, plant and equipment
Sh‖000‖
H limited (2560+1420) 3 980
S limited (1400+900) 2 300
Fair value gain 200
6 480
IFRSs Gives the guideline on the content and the accounting statements of certain events and
transactions in the financial statements. The following IFRSs are relevant for the purpose of
preparing published financial statements;
OVERVIEW
IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements sets out the overall requirements for financial
statements, including how they should be structured, the minimum requirements for their content
and overriding concepts such as going concern, the accrual basis of accounting and the
current/non-current distinction. The standard requires a complete set of financial statements to
comprise a statement of financial position, a statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive
income, a statement of changes in equity and a statement of cash flows.
IAS 1 was reissued in September 2007 and applies to annual periods beginning on or after 1
January 2009.
SUMMARY OF IAS 1
Objective of IAS 1
The objective of IAS 1 (2007) is to prescribe the basis for presentation of general purpose
financial statements, to ensure comparability both with the entity's financial statements of
previous periods and with the financial statements of other entities. IAS 1 sets out the overall
requirements for the presentation of financial statements, guidelines for their structure and
minimum requirements for their content. Standards for recognizing, measuring, and disclosing
specific transactions are addressed in other Standards and Interpretations.
Applies to all general purpose financial statements based on International Financial Reporting
Standards
General purpose financial statements are those intended to serve users who are not in a position
to require financial reports tailored to their particular information needs.
The objective of general purpose financial statements is to provide information about the
financial position, financial performance, and cash flows of an entity that is useful to a wide
range of users in making economic decisions. To meet that objective, financial statements
provide information about an entity's:
assets
liabilities
equity
income and expenses, including gains and losses
contributions by and distributions to owners
cash flows
That information, along with other information in the notes, assists users of financial statements
in predicting the entity's future cash flows and, in particular, their timing and certainty.
An entity may use titles for the statements other than those stated above.
The financial statements must "present fairly" the financial position, financial performance and
cash flows of an entity. Fair presentation requires the faithful representation of the effects of
transactions, other events, and conditions in accordance with the definitions and recognition
criteria for assets, liabilities, income and expenses set out in the Framework. The application of
IFRSs, with additional disclosure when necessary, is presumed to result in financial statements
that achieve a fair presentation.
IAS 1 requires that an entity whose financial statements comply with IFRSs make an explicit and
unreserved statement of such compliance in the notes. Financial statements shall not be described
as complying with IFRSs unless they comply with all the requirements of IFRSs (including
Interpretations).
Inappropriate accounting policies are not rectified either by disclosure of the accounting policies
used or by notes or explanatory material.
IAS 1 acknowledges that, in extremely rare circumstances, management may conclude that
compliance with an IFRS requirement would be so misleading that it would conflict with the
objective of financial statements set out in the Framework. In such a case, the entity is required
to depart from the IFRS requirement, with detailed disclosure of the nature, reasons, and impact
of the departure.
Going concern
IAS 1 requires that an entity prepare its financial statements, except for cash flow information,
using the accrual basis of accounting.
Consistency of presentation
The presentation and classification of items in the financial statements shall be retained from one
period to the next unless a change is justified either by a change in circumstances or a
requirement of a new IFRS.
Each material class of similar items must be presented separately in the financial statements.
Dissimilar items may be aggregated only if they are individually immaterial.
Offsetting
Assets and liabilities, and income and expenses, may not be offset unless required or permitted
by an IFRS.
Comparative information
IAS 1 requires that comparative information shall be disclosed in respect of the previous period
for all amounts reported in the financial statements, both face of financial statements and notes,
unless another Standard requires otherwise.
Clearly identify:
Reporting period
There is a presumption that financial statements will be prepared at least annually. If the annual
reporting period changes and financial statements are prepared for a different period, the entity
must disclose the reason for the change and a warning about problems of comparability.
An entity must normally present a classified statement of financial position, separating current
and non-current assets and liabilities. Only if a presentation based on liquidity provides
information that is reliable and more relevant may the current/non-current split be omitted. In
either case, if an asset (liability) category combines amounts that will be received (settled) after
12 months with assets (liabilities) that will be received (settled) within 12 months, note
disclosure is required that separates the longer-term amounts from the 12-month amounts.
Current liabilities are those expected to be settled within the entity's normal operating cycle or
due within 12 months, or those held for trading, or those for which the entity does not have an
unconditional right to defer payment beyond 12 months. Other liabilities are non-current.
When a long-term debt is expected to be refinanced under an existing loan facility and the entity
has the discretion the debt is classified as non-current, even if due within 12 months
If a liability has become payable on demand because an entity has breached an undertaking
under a long-term loan agreement on or before the reporting date, the liability is current, even if
the lender has agreed, after the reporting date and before the authorization of the financial
statements for issue, not to demand payment as a consequence of the breach. However, the
liability is classified as non-current if the lender agreed by the reporting date to provide a period
of grace ending at least 12 months after the end of the reporting period, within which the entity
can rectify the breach and during which the lender cannot demand immediate repayment.
Regarding issued share capital and reserves, the following disclosures are required:
numbers of shares authorized, issued and fully paid, and issued but not fully paid
par value
reconciliation of shares outstanding at the beginning and the end of the period
description of rights, preferences, and restrictions
treasury shares, including shares held by subsidiaries and associates
shares reserved for issuance under options and contracts
a description of the nature and purpose of each reserve within equity
Example:
ABC LTD
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 31/12/
NON-CURRENT ASSETS £ £
Property, plant and equipment x
Goodwill x
Other intangible assets x
Investment Long-term x
x
CURRENT ASSETS
Inventory x
Accounts receivables and prepayments x
Short-term investment x
Cash at bank and in hand x x
TOTAL ASSETS xx
EQUITY AND LIABILTIES
Preference share capital x
Ordinary share capital x
x
RESERVES
Share premium x
Revaluation reserve x
General reserve x x
Retained profits x
Shareholders‘ funds x
NON-CURENT LIABILITIES
Loan stock/debentures x
Redeemable preference shares x
Deferred tax x
Other long-term provisions x x
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Bank overdraft x
Trade and other payables (accruals) x
Current tax (tax payable) x
Current portion of loan stock x
Prepared dividends (and shares or preference shares) x x
TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITY xx
Comprehensive income for a period includes profit or loss for that period plus other
comprehensive income recognized in that period. As a result of the 2003 revision to IAS 1, the
Standard is now using 'profit or loss' rather than 'net profit or loss' as the descriptive term for the
bottom line of the income statement.
All items of income and expense recognized in a period must be included in profit or loss unless
a Standard or an Interpretation requires otherwise. [IAS 1.88] Some IFRSs require or permit that
some components to be excluded from profit or loss and instead to be included in other
comprehensive income.
Minimum items on the face of the statement of comprehensive income should include:
revenue
finance costs
share of the profit or loss of associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity
method
tax expense
a single amount comprising the total of (i) the post-tax profit or loss of discontinued
operations and (ii) the post-tax gain or loss recognized on the disposal of the assets or
disposal group(s) constituting the discontinued operation
profit or loss
each component of other comprehensive income classified by nature
The following items must also be disclosed in the statement of comprehensive income as
allocations for the period:
profit or loss for the period attributable to non-controlling interests and owners of the
parent
total comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests and owners of the
parent
Additional line items may be needed to fairly present the entity's results of operations. No items
may be presented in the statement of comprehensive income (or in the income statement, if
separately presented) or in the notes as 'extraordinary items'.
Certain items must be disclosed separately either in the statement of comprehensive income or in
the notes, if material, including:
restructurings of the activities of an entity and reversals of any provisions for the costs of
restructuring
disposals of items of property, plant and equipment
disposals of investments
discontinuing operations
litigation settlements
other reversals of provisions
Expenses recognized in profit or loss should be analyzed either by nature (raw materials, staffing
costs, depreciation, etc.) or by function (cost of sales, selling, administrative, etc). If an entity
categorizes by function, then additional information on the nature of expenses – at a minimum
depreciation, amortization and employee benefits expense – must be disclose
By function
ABC LTD
INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31/12/
£ £
Revenue x
Cost of sales (x)
Gross profit x
Other incomes (e.g. investment income) x
x
Expenses
Distribution costs x
Administration costs x
Other expenses x
Finance costs x (x)
Profit before x
Income tax expense (x)
Profit for the period xx
By Nature
ABC LTD
INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31/12/
£ £
Revenue x
Other incomes x
x
Expenses
Raw materials consumed x
Changes in finished goods and work in progress x
Depreciation and amortization x
Employee benefits x
Other expenses x
Finance costs x (x)
Profit before tax x
Income tax expenses (x)
Profit for the period xx
Rather than setting out separate standards for presenting the cash flow statement, IAS 1.111
refers to IAS 7 Statement of Cash Flows
total comprehensive income for the period, showing separately amounts attributable to
owners of the parent and to non-controlling interests
the effects of retrospective application, when applicable, for each component
reconciliations between the carrying amounts at the beginning and the end of the period
for each component of equity, separately disclosing:
o profit or loss
o each item of other comprehensive income
o transactions with owners, showing separately contributions by and distributions to
owners and changes in ownership interests in subsidiaries that do not result in a
loss of control
The following amounts may also be presented on the face of the statement of changes in equity,
or they may be presented in the notes:
present information about the basis of preparation of the financial statements and the
specific accounting policies used
disclose any information required by IFRSs that is not presented elsewhere in the
financial statements and
provide additional information that is not presented elsewhere in the financial statements
but is relevant to an understanding of any of them
Notes should be cross-referenced from the face of the financial statements to the relevant note.
IAS 1.114 suggests that the notes should normally be presented in the following order:
Disclosure of judgments
New in the 2003 revision to IAS 1, an entity must disclose, in the summary of significant
accounting policies or other notes, the judgements, apart from those involving estimations, that
management has made in the process of applying the entity's accounting policies that have the
most significant effect on the amounts recognized in the financial statements.
Also new in the 2003 revision to IAS 1, an entity must disclose, in the notes, information about
the key assumptions concerning the future, and other key sources of estimation uncertainty at the
end of the reporting period, that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the
carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year. These disclosures do not
involve disclosing budgets or forecasts.
The following other note disclosures are required by IAS 1.126 if not disclosed elsewhere in
information published with the financial statements:
OTHER DISCLOSURES
In addition to the distributions information in the statement of changes in equity (see above), the
following must be disclosed in the notes: " the amount of dividends proposed or declared before
the financial statements were authorized for issue but not recognized as a distribution to owners
during the period, and the related amount per share and " the amount of any cumulative
preference dividends not recognized.
Capital disclosures
An entity should disclose information about its objectives, policies and processes for managing
capital. To comply with this, the disclosures include:
qualitative information about the entity's objectives, policies and processes for managing
capital, including>
o description of capital it manages
Preserve the amendments made to IAS 1 in 2007 to require profit or loss and OCI to be
presented together, i.e. either as a single statement of comprehensive income, or separate
income statement and a statement of comprehensive income — rather than requiring a
single continuous statement as was proposed in the exposure draft
Require entities to group items presented in OCI based on whether they are potentially
reclassifiable to profit or loss subsequently. i.e. those that might be reclassified and those
that will not be reclassified
Require tax associated with items presented before tax to be shown separately for each of
the two groups of OCI items (without changing the option to present items of OCI either
before tax or net of tax)
Applicable to annual periods beginning on or after 1 July 2012, with early adoption
permitted.
INTRODUCTION:
Companies report a statement of stockholders‘ equity, which includes retained earnings. The
statement of stockholders‘ equity is formatted like a statement of retained earnings but with a
column for each element of stockholders‘ equity. The statement of stockholders‘ equity thus
reports the reasons for all the changes in equity during the period.
Preferred stock - This is the investment by preferred stockholders, which have priority
over common shareholders and receive a dividend that has priority over any distribution
made to common shareholders. This is usually recorded at par value.
Additional paid-up capital (contributed capital) - This is capital received from
investors for stock; it is equal to capital stock plus paid-in capital. It is also called
"contributed capital".
Common stock - This is the investment by stockholders, and it is valued at par or stated
value.
Retained earnings - This is the total net income (or loss) less the amount distributed to
August 2015
the shareholders in the form of a dividend since the company'swww.fb.com/kasnebcsia
initiation.
148
Other items - This is an all-inclusive account that may include valuation allowance and
cumulative translation allowance (CTA), among others. Valuation allowance pertains to
noncurrent investments resulting from selective recognition of market value changes.
Cumulative translation allowance is used to report the effects of translating foreign
currency transactions, and accounts for foreign affiliates.
This statement shows the changes in each type of stockholders' equity account and the total
stockholders' equity during the accounting period. This statement usually includes:
Preferred stock
Common stock
Issue of par value stock
Additional paid-in capital
Treasury stock repurchase
Cumulative Translation Allowance (CTA)
Retained earning
The financial statement that follows below is the 20X9 statement of stockholders‘ equity for
Allied Electronics Corporation.
There is a column for each element of equity, starting with Common Stock on the left. The far-
right column reports the total.
The top row (line 1) reports beginning balances, taken from last period‘s balance sheet. The rows
then report the various transactions that affected equity, starting with Issuance of stock (line 2).
The statement ends with the December 31, 20X9, balances (line 10).
All the amounts on the bottom line appear on the ending balance sheet, given in the statement of
financial position
Comprehensive Income
Common Additional Retained Treasury Unrealized Foreign- Total
Investment Adjustment
1.Balance, $10,000 $160,000 $130,000 (25,000) $6,000 $(10,000) $271,000
December 31,
20X8
2. Issuance of 20,000 500,000 520,000
stock..
3. Net income 69,000 69,000
4 .Cash (21,000) (21,000)
dividends
5 Stock 3,000 72,000 (75,000) 0
dividend—10%
6 .Purchase of (9,000) (9,000)
treasury stock
7 .Sale of 7,000 4,000 11,000
treasury stock
8. Unrealized 1,000 1,000
gain
on investments
9.Foreign- 3,000 3,000
currency
translation
adjustment
10. Balance, $33,000 $739,000 $103,000 (30,000) $7,000 $ (7,000) $845,000
December 31,
20X9.
During 20X9, Allied issued common stock for $520,000. Of this total, $20,000 (par value) went
into the Common Stock account, and $500,000 increased Additional Paid-in Capital. Total
equity increased by $520,000.
During 20X9, Allied Electronics earned net income of $69,000, which increased Retained
Earnings. The net income is from the income statement.
Allied Electronics declared cash dividends of $21,000. The statement of shareholders‘ equity
reports the decrease in retained earnings from the declaration of the cash dividends.
During 20X9, Allied Electronics distributed a stock dividend to its stockholders. Prior to the
stock dividend, Allied‘s Common Stock account had a balance of $30,000 (beginning balance of
$10,000 + new issue of $20,000). The 10% stock dividend then added 3,000 shares of $1-par
common stock, or $3,000, to the Common Stock account.
Allied decreased (debited) Retained Earnings for the market value of this ―small‖ stock dividend.
The difference between the market value of the dividend ($75,000) and its par value ($3,000)
was credited to Additional Paid-in Capital ($72,000)
Treasury stock is recorded at cost. During 20X9, Allied Electronics paid $9,000 to buy treasury
stock (line 6). This transaction decreased stockholders‘ equity.
Allied later sold some treasury stock (line 7). The sale of treasury stock brought in $11,000 cash
and increased total stockholders‘ equity by $11,000. The treasury stock that Allied sold had cost
the company $4,000, and the extra $7,000 was added to Additional Paid-in Capital. At year end
(line 10), Allied still owned treasury stock that cost the company $30,000. The parentheses
around the treasury stock figures in the statement of shareholders‘ equity means that treasury
stock is a negative element of stockholders‘ equity. Trace treasury stock‘s ending balance to the
statement of financial position in Allied electronics shown below.
Two categories of other comprehensive income are unrealized gains and losses on available for-
sale investments and the foreign-currency translation adjustment.
At December 31, 20X8, Allied Electronics held available-for-sale investments with an unrealized
gain of $6,000. This explains the beginning balance. Then, during 20X9, the market value of the
investments increased by another $1,000 (line 8)
At December 31, 20X9, Allied‘s portfolio of investments had an unrealized gain of $7,000 (line
10). An unrealized loss on investments would appear as a negative amount. At December 31,
20X8, Allied had a negative foreign-currency translation adjustment of $10,000 (line 1). During
20X9, the foreign-currency translation adjustment increased by $3,000 (line 9), and at December
31, 20X9, Allied‘s cumulative foreign-currency translation adjustment stood at $7,000—a
negative amount that resembles an unrealized loss (line 10).
When the parent company owns less than 100% of the ordinary share capital of the subsidiary
company then the other balance is held by minority interest. Therefore if the parent company
owns 80% of the ordinary share capital of the subsidiary then the minority interest owns 20%.
The minority interest (M.I) should be shown separately in the consolidated statement of financial
position but as part of shareholders funds and the figure to appear in the statement of financial
Alternatively, the total due to the minority interest can be prepared by opening the Minority
Interest account whereby the Minority interest‘s share of the osc, capital reserves and retained
profits in subsidiary company is posted to the credit side.
Leases
Lease is an agreement between two parties i.e. the lessor and the lessee where the lessor who is
the owner of the asset transfers to the lessee the right to use the asset in return of periodic
payment called lease rentals
A lease contract enables the lessee to obtain the use of property without making initial payment
of the asset it is therefore a financing strategy as the property can be used in generating cash for
payment of the lease rentals.
1. Finance lease
2. Operating lease
QUESTION
Sh.‖000‖ Sh.‖000‖
Ordinary share capital(sh.10 each) 56,000
Retained earnings (1 November 2010) 1,400
8% convertible loan stock 30,000
Freehold property at cost 1 November 2010:
(land element sh.25 million) 75,000
Plant and equipment (at cost) 74,500
Accumulated depreciation (1 November 2010):
Building 10,000
Additional information:
1. The inventory of Ziwani limited was not counted until 4 November 2011 due to operation
reasons. At this date, the cost of this inventory was sh.36million and this figure had been used in
the cost of sales calculation above. Between the year ended 31 October 2011 and 4 November,
Ziwani limited received a delivery of goods at a cost of sh.2.7 million and made sales of sh.7.8
million at a markup on cost of 30%. Neither the goods delivered nor the sales made in this period
were included in Ziwani limited‘s purchases (as part of cost of sales) or revenues in the above
trial balance.
2. On 1 November 2010, Ziwani limited decided, for the first time, to value its freehold property.
A qualified property valuer reported that the market value of the freehold property on this date
was sh.80million of which sh.30million related to the land. At this date, the remaining estimated
life of the building was 20 years. Plant is depreciated at 20% per annum on a reducing balance
method.
3. The bank loan is being repaid in ten equal installments which commenced on 1 November
2006.
5. The balance on current tax represents the under/over provisions of the tax liability for the year
ended 31 October 2011. The required provision for income tax for the year ended 31 October
2011 is sh. 19.4 million. The net temporary differences during the year were determined as
sh.19.8 million.
6. Income tax and deferred tax are provided at a rate of 30% on all items giving rise to tal
Required:
(a) Statement of comprehensive income for the year ended 31 October 2011 (8
marks)
(b) Statement of changes in equity for the year ended 31 October 2011 (4
marks)
(Total: 20 marks)
Suggested solution:
Revaluation surplus:
50 000
Building = 2 500
20
50 − 10 = 40
11 500
Current = 2 300 current liabilities
5
11 500
47 100
Admin expense:
Reported 30 700
33 055
Provision 19 400
Finance cost:
4 240
a)
b)
c)
Non-current assets:
Current assets:
Inventory 39 300
Receivables 44 754
201 545
Question:
A finance lease transfers substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of an
asset to the lease while an operating lease is any other than a finance lease.
Question:
On 1 January 2009, Kamulu limited leased a machine from general machines ltd. under a finance
lease agreement. Kamulu limited was to make installment lease payments of sh.14, 000, 000
every six months on 30 June and 31 December in arrears. The first payment was made on 30
June 2009. The fair value of the machine was sh.60, 000, 000 with an estimated useful life of 3
years. The first interest rate implicit in the lease was 10% per six months.
Required:
i. Extracts of the statement of comprehensive income for the years ended 31 December
2009 and 2010.
ii. Extracts of the statement of financial position as at December 2009 and 2010.
Year Balance b/d interest@10% Lease rental Principal paid Bal c/d
2009 2010
Sh‖000‖ Sh‖000‖
Expenses:
2009 2010
Sh‖000‖ Sh‖000‖
Assets:
Liabilities:
Non-current liabilities
current liabilities
Question:
Outline the four main categories of financial instruments in the context of International
Accounts Standard (IAS) 39.
Financial instruments are contracts that give rise to financial assets of one entity and financial
liability or equity instruments of another entity.
- Financial assets at a fair value through profit and loss (FVPL). - These are financial
assets which are acquired with the intention of resale. Include share and loan stocks
which are traded on a stock exchange and derivative having a net cash inflow
- Held to maturity (HTM)-these are financial assets that are acquired with the intention to
be held till the maturity or settlement date. Include the loan stock traded in the stock
exchange with the intention to hold till they mature
- Loans and receivables (L/R)- these are financial assets which are acquired with the
intention to be held till maturity date although no active market is involved
- Available for sale (AFS)- this is normally a default category for other financial assets
that the firm may wish to classify as available for sale. Include shares and loan stocks not
Question:
With respect of International Accounts Standard (IAS) 37, Provisions, Contingent liabilities
and Contingent assets
A contingent liability is a possible obligation that arises from past events and whose existence
will be confirmed only by the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more uncertain future
events not wholly within the control of the entity or a present obligation that arises from past
events but is not recognized because:
ii. Identify the three circumstances under which a provision should be recognized
in the financial statements
An entity shall not recognize a contingent liability unless the possibility of any outflow in
settlement is remote, an entity should disclose for each class of contingent liability at the end of
August 2015 www.fb.com/kasnebcsia
162
reporting period a brief description of the nature of the contingent liability and where,
practicable.
Question:
i. Explain when the cost of an item of property ,plant and equipment should be
recognized as an asset
It is probable that the future economic benefits associated with the item
will flow to entity
The cost of the item can be measured reliably
ii. Briefly describe the accounting treatment with respect to the increase in the
carrying amount of an asset as a result of revaluation
iii. Outline any two disclosure requirement for items of property, plant and
equipment which are stated at revalued amounts
IAS 7 Statement of Cash Flows requires an entity to present a statement of cash flows as an
integral part of its primary financial statements. Cash flows are classified and presented into
operating activities (either using the 'direct' or 'indirect' method), investing activities or financing
August 2015 www.fb.com/kasnebcsia
164
activities, with the latter two categories generally presented on a gross basis.
IAS 7 was reissued in December 1992, retiled in September 2007, and is operative for financial
statements covering periods beginning on or after 1 January 1994.
SUMMARY OF IAS 7
Objective of IAS 7
The objective of IAS 7 is to require the presentation of information about the historical changes
in cash and cash equivalents of an entity by means of a statement of cash flows, which classifies
cash flows during the period according to operating, investing, and financing activities.
All entities that prepare financial statements in conformity with IFRSs are required to present a
statement of cash flows.
The statement of cash flows analyses changes in cash and cash equivalents during a period. Cash
and cash equivalents comprise cash on hand and demand deposits, together with short-term,
highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to a known amount of cash and that are
subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value. Guidance notes indicate that an investment
normally meets the definition of a cash equivalent when it has a maturity of three months or less
from the date of acquisition. Equity investments are normally excluded, unless they are in
substance a cash equivalent (e.g. preferred shares acquired within three months of their specified
redemption date). Bank overdrafts which are repayable on demand and which form an integral
part of an entity's cash management are also included as a component of cash and cash
equivalents.
Cash flows must be analyzed between operating, investing and financing activities.
Key principles specified by IAS 7 for the preparation of a statement of cash flows are as follows:
operating activities are the main revenue-producing activities of the entity that are not
investing or financing activities, so operating cash flows include cash received from
customers and cash paid to suppliers and employees
investing activities are the acquisition and disposal of long-term assets and other
investments that are not considered to be cash equivalents
financing activities are activities that alter the equity capital and borrowing structure of
the entity
interest and dividends received and paid may be classified as operating, investing, or
financing cash flows, provided that they are classified consistently from period to period
The indirect method adjusts accrual basis net profit or loss for the effects of non-cash
transactions. The operating cash flows section of the statement of cash flows under the
indirect method would appear something like this:
the exchange rate used for translation of transactions denominated in a foreign currency
should be the rate in effect at the date of the cash flows
cash flows of foreign subsidiaries should be translated at the exchange rates prevailing
when the cash flows took place
as regards the cash flows of associates and joint ventures, where the equity method is
used, the statement of cash flows should report only cash flows between the investor and
August 2015 www.fb.com/kasnebcsia
166
the investee; where proportionate consolidation is used, the cash flow statement should
include the venture‘s share of the cash flows of the investee
Aggregate cash flows relating to acquisitions and disposals of subsidiaries and other
business units should be presented separately and classified as investing activities, with
specified additional disclosures. The aggregate cash paid or received as consideration
should be reported net of cash and cash equivalents acquired or disposed of.
cash flows from investing and financing activities should be reported gross by major
class of cash receipts and major class of cash payments except for the following cases,
which may be reported on a net basis:
o cash receipts and payments on behalf of customers (for example, receipt and
repayment of demand deposits by banks, and receipts collected on behalf of and
paid over to the owner of a property)
o cash receipts and payments for items in which the turnover is quick, the amounts
are large, and the maturities are short, generally less than three months (for
example, charges and collections from credit card customers, and purchase and
sale of investments)
o cash receipts and payments relating to deposits by financial institutions
o cash advances and loans made to customers and repayments thereof
investing and financing transactions which do not require the use of cash should be
excluded from the statement of cash flows, but they should be separately disclosed
elsewhere in the financial statements
the components of cash and cash equivalents should be disclosed, and a reconciliation
presented to amounts reported in the statement of financial position
the amount of cash and cash equivalents held by the entity that is not available for use by
the group should be disclosed, together with a commentary by management
IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors is applied in selecting
and applying accounting policies, accounting for changes in estimates and reflecting corrections
of prior period errors.
The standard requires compliance with any specific IFRS applying to a transaction, event or
condition, and provides guidance on developing accounting policies for other items that result in
relevant and reliable information. Changes in accounting policies and corrections of errors are
generally retrospectively accounted for, whereas changes in accounting estimates are generally
accounted for on a prospective basis.
Accounting policies are the specific principles, bases, conventions, rules and practices
applied by an entity in preparing and presenting financial statements.
A change in accounting estimate is an adjustment of the carrying amount of an asset or
liability, or related expense, resulting from reassessing the expected future benefits and
obligations associated with that asset or liability.
International Financial Reporting Standards are standards and interpretations adopted
by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). They comprise:
o International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs)
o International Accounting Standards (IASs)
o Interpretations developed by the International Financial Reporting Interpretations
Committee (IFRIC) or the former Standing Interpretations Committee (SIC) and
approved by the IASB.
Materiality. Omissions or misstatements of items are material if they could, by their size
or nature, individually or collectively; influence the economic decisions of users taken on
the basis of the financial statements.
Prior period errors are omissions from, and misstatements in, an entity's financial
statements for one or more prior periods arising from a failure to use, or misuse of,
reliable information that was available and could reasonably be expected to have been
obtained and taken into account in preparing those statements. Such errors result from
mathematical mistakes, mistakes in applying accounting policies, oversights or
misinterpretations of facts, and fraud.
the requirements and guidance in IASB standards and interpretations dealing with similar
and related issues; and
The definitions, recognition criteria and measurement concepts for assets, liabilities,
income and expenses in the Framework.
An entity shall select and apply its accounting policies consistently for similar transactions, other
events and conditions, unless a Standard or an Interpretation specifically requires or permits
categorization of items for which different policies may be appropriate. If a Standard or an
Interpretation requires or permits such categorization, an appropriate accounting policy shall be
selected and applied consistently to each category.
Note that changes in accounting policies do not include applying an accounting policy to a kind
of transaction or event that did not occur previously or were immaterial.
If a change in accounting policy is required by a new IASB standard or interpretation, the change
is accounted for as required by that new pronouncement or, if the new pronouncement does not
include specific transition provisions, then the change in accounting policy is applied
retrospectively.
Retrospective application means adjusting the opening balance of each affected component of
equity for the earliest prior period presented and the other comparative amounts disclosed for
each prior period presented as if the new accounting policy had always been applied.
If an entity has not applied a new standard or interpretation that has been issued but is not yet
effective, the entity must disclose that fact and any and known or reasonably estimable
August 2015 www.fb.com/kasnebcsia
170
information relevant to assessing the possible impact that the new pronouncement will have in
the year it is applied.
the period of the change, if the change affects that period only, or
The period of the change and future periods, if the change affects both.
However, to the extent that a change in an accounting estimate gives rise to changes in assets and
liabilities, or relates to an item of equity, it is recognized by adjusting the carrying amount of the
related asset, liability, or equity item in the period of the change.
Disclose:
The nature and amount of a change in an accounting estimate that has an effect in the
current period or is expected to have an effect in future periods
If the amount of the effect in future periods is not disclosed because estimating it is
impracticable, an entity shall disclose that fact. [IAS 8.39-40]
Errors
The general principle in IAS 8 is that an entity must correct all material prior period errors
retrospectively in the first set of financial statements authorized for issue after their discovery by:
restating the comparative amounts for the prior period(s) presented in which the error
occurred; or
If the error occurred before the earliest prior period presented, restating the opening
balances of assets, liabilities and equity for the earliest prior period presented.
Objective
IPSAS aims to improve the quality of general purpose financial reporting by public sector
entities, leading to better informed assessments of the resource allocation decisions made by
governments, thereby increasing transparency and accountability.
Scope
IPSAS are accounting standards for application by national governments, regional (e.g., state,
provincial, territorial) governments, local (e.g., city, town) governments and related
governmental entities (e.g., agencies, boards and commissions). IPSAS standards are widely
used by intergovernmental organizations. IPSAS do not apply to government business
enterprises.
Due process
IPSAS are based on the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), formerly known as
IAS. IFRS are issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). IPSASB adapts
IFRS to a public sector context when appropriate. In undertaking that process, the IPSASB
attempts, wherever possible, to maintain the accounting treatment and original text of the IFRS
unless there is a significant public sector issue which warrants a departure.
IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts applies, with limited exceptions, to all insurance contracts
(including reinsurance contracts) that an entity issues and to reinsurance contracts that it holds.
In light of the IASB's comprehensive project on insurance contracts, the standard provides a
temporary exemption from the requirements of some other IFRSs, including the requirement to
consider IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors when
selecting accounting policies for insurance contracts.
IFRS 4 was issued in March 2004 and applies to annual periods beginning on or after 1 January
2005.
Summary of IFRS 4
Background
IFRS 4 is the first guidance from the IASB on accounting for insurance contracts – but not the
last. A Second Phase of the IASB's Insurance Project is under way. The Board issued IFRS 4
because it saw an urgent need for improved disclosures for insurance contracts, and some
improvements to recognition and measurement practices, in time for the adoption of IFRS by
listed companies throughout Europe and elsewhere in 2005.
Scope
IFRS 4 applies to virtually all insurance contracts (including reinsurance contracts) that an entity
issues and to reinsurance contracts that it holds. [IFRS 4.2] It does not apply to other assets and
liabilities of an insurer, such as financial assets and financial liabilities within the scope of IAS
39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. [IFRS 4.3] Furthermore, it does not
address accounting by policyholders. [IFRS 4.4(f)]
An insurance contract is a "contract under which one party (the insurer) accepts significant
insurance risk from another party (the policyholder) by agreeing to compensate the policyholder
if a specified uncertain future event (the insured event) adversely affects the policyholder."
[IFRS 4.Appendix A]
Accounting policies
The IFRS exempts an insurer temporarily (until completion of Phase II of the Insurance Project)
from some requirements of other IFRSs, including the requirement to consider IAS 8 Accounting
Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors in selecting accounting policies for
insurance contracts. However, the standard: [IFRS 4.14]
prohibits provisions for possible claims under contracts that are not in existence at the
reporting date (such as catastrophe and equalisation provisions)
requires a test for the adequacy of recognised insurance liabilities and an impairment test
for reinsurance assets
requires an insurer to keep insurance liabilities in its balance sheet until they are
discharged or cancelled, or expire, and prohibits offsetting insurance liabilities against
related reinsurance assets and income or expense from reinsurance contracts against the
expense or income from the related insurance contract
IFRS 4 permits an insurer to change its accounting policies for insurance contracts only if, as a
result, its financial statements present information that is more relevant and no less reliable, or
more reliable and no less relevant. [IFRS 4.22] In particular, an insurer cannot introduce any of
the following practices, although it may continue using accounting policies that involve them:
[IFRS 4.25]
The IFRS permits the introduction of an accounting policy that involves remeasuring designated
insurance liabilities consistently in each period to reflect current market interest rates (and, if the
insurer so elects, other current estimates and assumptions). Without this permission, an insurer
would have been required to apply the change in accounting policies consistently to all similar
liabilities. [IFRS 4.24]
Prudence
An insurer need not change its accounting policies for insurance contracts to eliminate excessive
prudence. However, if an insurer already measures its insurance contracts with sufficient
prudence, it should not introduce additional prudence. [IFRS 4.26]
There is a rebuttable presumption that an insurer's financial statements will become less relevant
and reliable if it introduces an accounting policy that reflects future investment margins in the
measurement of insurance contracts. [IFRS 4.27]
Asset classifications
When an insurer changes its accounting policies for insurance liabilities, it may reclassify some
or all financial assets as 'at fair value through profit or loss'.
Other issues
The standard:
clarifies that an insurer need not account for an embedded derivative separately at fair
value if the embedded derivative meets the definition of an insurance contract
requires an insurer to unbundle (that is, to account separately for) deposit components of
some insurance contracts, to avoid the omission of assets and liabilities from its balance
sheet
clarifies the applicability of the practice sometimes known as 'shadow accounting'
permits an expanded presentation for insurance contracts acquired in a business
combination or portfolio transfer
addresses limited aspects of discretionary participation features contained in insurance
contracts or financial instruments
Disclosures
Fitch Ratings – a leading global fixed income rating agency – has analysed the implications of
IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts and has concluded that Fitch "does not expect any rating actions as
a direct result of the move to IFRS. However, Fitch cannot rule out the possibility that the
additional disclosure and information contained in the accounts could lead to rating changes due
to an improved perception of risk based on the enhanced information available." The special
report Mind the GAAP: Fitch's View on Insurance IFRS provides an overview of IFRS 4 and the
issues being addressed in Phase II of the IASB's insurance project; assesses the implications
including increased volatility, greater use of discounting and fair values, changes to income
recognition, and enhanced disclosures; and discusses how the changes affect ratings analysis. An
excerpt:
Definition
"A statement of changes in the financial position of a firm on cash basis is called a cash
flow statement."
The cash flow statement describes the inflow (sources) & outflow (uses) of cash. It
summarizes the causes of changes in cash position of a business enterprise between two balance
sheets.
1. Cash Flow Statement is prepared on cash basis hence it is useful in evaluating the cash
position of an enterprise.
2. A projected cash flow statement can be prepared so that it can enable the firm to plan &
co – ordinate its financial operations efficiently.
3. A comparison of historical & projected cash flow statements will reveal variations in the
performance so that the firm can take immediate effective action.
4. It indicates whether a firm's short term paying capacity is improving or deteriorating over
a period of time by preparing cash flow statements for a number of years.
5. It helps in planning the repayment of loans, replacement of fixed assets etc. It is also
significant for making capital budgeting decisions.
6. It clearly indicates the causes for poor cash position in spite of substantial profits in a
firm by throwing light on various applications of cash made by the firm.
7. Cash Flow Statement provides information of all activities classified under operating,
investing & financing activities.
ii) Cash Flow statement is not suitable for judging the profitability of a firm as non – cash
charges are ignored while calculating cash flows from operating activities.
iii) Funds flow statement presents a more complete picture than Cash flow statement.
iv) It is difficult to define the term "cash". There are no controversies over a number of items
like cheques, stamps, postal orders etc whether they are to be included in cash.
Note:
i. An increase in liability is a source of cash or cash inflow e.g. increase in creditors implies
purchase of goods on credit. Although no cash is received we can say that creditors have
given us loans which we have utilized to purchase goods from them.
ii. A decrease in liability is an application of cash or cash outflow e.g. sundry creditors are
paid off.
iv. A decrease in asset is an inflow or source of cash e.g. sale of stock, cash received from
debtors.
An enterprise should report cash flow from operating activities using either:
The direct method, whereby major classes of gross cash payments are disclosed ;or
Enterprises are encouraged to report cash flows from operating activities using the direct method.
Under the direct method information about major classes of gross cash receipts and gross cash
payments may be obtained either:
under the indirect method, the net cash flow from operating activities is determined by adjusting
a net profit or loss for the effects of:
a) changes during the period in inventories and operating activities receivables and payables
b) non-cash items such as depreciation, provisions, deferred taxes, unrealized minority
interest
c) All other items for which the cash effects are investing or financing cash flows.
Alternatively, the net cash flow from operating activities may be presented under the indirect
method by showing the revenue and expenses disclosed in the income statement and the changes
during the period in inventories and operating receivables and payable.
An enterprise should report separately major classes of gross cash receipts and gross cash
payments arising from investing and financing activities, except to the extent that cash flows
described below are reported on a net basis.
Cash flow arising from the following operating, investing or financing activities may be reported
on a net basis:
a) Cash receipts and payments on behalf of customers when the cash flow reflect the
activities of the customer rather than those of the enterprise; and
August 2015 www.fb.com/kasnebcsia
180
b) Cash receipts and payments for items, in which the turnover is quick, the amounts are
large, and the maturities are short.
Examples of cash receipts and payments referred to in (a) above are:
a) Cash receipts and payments for the acceptance and repayment of deposits with fixed
maturity date.
b) The placement of deposits with and withdrawal of deposits from other financial
institutions
c) Cash advances and loans made to customers and repayment of those advances and loans
Cash flows arising from transactions in a foreign currency should be recorded in an enterprises
reporting currency by applying to the foreign currency amount to the exchange rate between the
reporting currency and the foreign currency at the date of the cash flow.
The cash flow of a foreign subsidiary should be translated at the exchange rate between the
reporting currency and the foreign currency at the dates of cash flow
Unrealized gains and losses arising from changes in foreign currency exchange rates are not cash
flows. However, the effects of exchange rates changes on cash equivalents held or due in a
foreign currency is reported in the cash flow statement in order to reconcile cash and cash
equivalent at the beginning and the end of the period. This amount is presented separately from
cash flow from operating activities and financing activities and includes the differences, if any,
had those cash flows been reported at end of period exchange rates.
The cash flow associated with extraordinary items should be classified as arising from operating,
investing or financing activities as appropriate and separately disclosed
Cash flows from interest and dividends received and paid should each be disclosed separately.
Each should be classified in a consistent manner from period to period either as operating,
investing or financing activities
The total amount of interest paid during a period is disclosed in the cash flow statement whether
it has been recognized as an expense in the income statement or capitalized
Interest paid and interest and dividend received are usually classified as operating cash flows for
a financial institution. However, there is no consensus on the classification of these cash flows
for other enterprises. Interest paid and interest and dividends received may constitute operating
cash flow because they enter into the determination of net profit or loss alternatively, interest
paid and interest dividends received may be classified as financing cash flow and investing cash
flows respectively, because they are costs of obtaining financial resources or returns on
investment.
Dividends paid may be classified as a financing cash flow because they are a cost of obtaining
financial resources. Alternatively, dividends paid may be classified as a component of cash flow
from operating activities in order to assist users to determine the ability of an enterprise to pay
dividends out of operating cash flows.
TAXES ON INCOME
Cash flows arising from taxes on income should be separately disclosed and should be classified
as cash flow from operating activities unless they can be specifically identified with financing
and investing activities
Taxes on income arises on transactions that give rise to cash flow that are classified as operating
,investing or financing activities in a cash flow statement. While tax expense may be readily
identifiable with investing or financing activities the relating tax cash flow are often
impracticable to identify and may arise in a different period from the cash flows of the
underlying transaction. Therefore, taxes paid are usually classified as cash flow from operating
activities. However, when it is practicable to identify the tax cash flows with an individual
transaction that gives rise to cash flows that are classified as investing or financing activities the
tax cash flow is then classified as an investing or financing activity as appropriate. When tax
cash flows are allocated over more than one class of activity, the total amount of taxes paid is
disclosed.
When accounting for an investment in an associated or a subsidiary for by use of the equity or
cost method, an investor restricts its reporting in the cash flow statement to the cash flow
between itself and the investee, for example, to dividends and advances
An enterprise that reports its interests in a jointly controlled entity using proportionate
The aggregate cash flows arising from acquisition and from disposals of subsidiaries or other
business units should be presented separately and classified as investing activities.
The separate presentation of the cash flow effects of acquisitions and disposals of subsidiaries
and other business units as single line items, together with the separate disclosure of the amounts
of assets and liabilities acquired or disposed of, helps to distinguish those cash flows from the
cash flows arising from the other operating, investing and financing activities. The cash flow
effects of disposals are not deducted from those of acquisitions.
The aggregate amount of the cash paid or received as purchase or sale consideration is reported
in the cash flow statement net of cash and cash equivalent acquired or disposed of.
NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS
Investing and financing transactions that do not require the use of cash or cash equivalents
should be excluded. From a cash flow statement, such transactions should be disclosed elsewhere
in the financial statements in a way that provides all the relevant information about these
investing and financing activities.
Many investing and financing activities do not have a direct impact on current cash flows
although they do affect the capital and asset structure of a company. The exclusion of non-cash
transactions from the cash flow statement is consistent with the objective of a cash flow
statement as these items do not involve cash flows in the current period. Examples of non-cash
transactions are :
An enterprise should disclose the components of cash and cash equivalents and should present a
reconciliation of the amounts in its cash flow statement with the equivalent items reported in the
balance sheet.
OTHER DISCLOSURES
Additional information may be relevant to users in understanding the financial position and
liquidation of a company. Disclosure of this information, together with a commentary by
management, is encouraged and may include:
a) The amount of undrawn borrowing facilities that may be available for future operating
activities and to settle capital commitments, indicating any restrictions on the use of these
facilities.
b) The aggregate amounts of cash flows that represent increase in operating capacity
separately from those cash flows that are require maintaining operating capacity.
The separate disclosure of cash flows that represent increases in operating capacity and cash
flows are required to maintain operating capacity is useful in enabling the user to determine
whether the company is investing adequately in the maintenance of its operating capacity. A
company that does not invest adequately in the maintenance of its operating capacity may be
prejudicing future profitability for the use of current liquidity and distribution to owners.
Direct method:
Sh sh
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash receipts from customers XX
Cash paid to suppliers (of goods and services) XX
Cash paid to and on behalf of employees XX
Cash generated from operations XX
Interest paid XX
Income tax paid XX
Cash flow before extraordinary item XX
Extraordinary item XX
Net cash from operating XX
Cash flow from investing activities
Purchase of property, plant and equipment XX
Proceeds from sale of equipment XX
Interest received XX
Dividends received XX
Net cash from or used in investing activities XX
Cash flow from financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of share capital XX
Proceeds from long term borrowing XX
Payment of finance lease liability XX
Dividends paid XX
Net cash from or used in financing activities XX
Net increase in cash and cash equivalent XX
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period XX
Cash and cash equivalent at end of period XX
Indirect method:
sh Sh
Cash flows from operating activities
interest and commission receipts XX
interest payments XX
Recoveries on loans previously written off XX
Cash payments of employees and supplies XX
Operating profit before charges in operating assets XX
Increase or decrease in operating assets;
Short term funds XX
Extraordinary item XX
Deposits held for regulatory or monetary control purposes XX
Funds advanced to customers
Net increase in credit and receivables XX
Other short term negotiable securities XX
Increase or decrease in operating liabilities;
Deposit from customers XX
Negotiable certificates of deposit XX
Net cash from operating activities income tax XX
Income tax paid XX
Net cash from operating activities XX
Cash flow from investing activities
Disposal from subsidiary Y XX
Dividends received XX
Interest received XX
Proceeds from sale of non-dealing securities XX
Purchase of non-dealing securities XX
Purchase of property, plant and equipment XX
Net cash from investing activities XX
Cash flow from financing activities
Issue of loan capital XX
Issue of preference shares by subsidiary undertaking XX
Repayment of long-term borrowing XX
Net decrease in other borrowing XX
Net cash from financing activities XX
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents XX
Net increase in cash and cash activities XX
Cash and cash equivalents at begging of period XX
Cash and cash equivalent at end of period XX
Example:
August 2015 www.fb.com/kasnebcsia
187
The chief accountant of Gucci Ltd availed the following financial statement for the financial
years ended 30th April 2011 and 2010
Additional information:
1. The purchase of land was financed by the issue of new ordinary shares at premium
2. An old piece of equipment was sold during the financial year ended 30th April 2011 at a profit
sh. 30,000,000.
Depreciation was provided as follows in the year:
Sh‖000‖
Motor vehicle 100,000
Equipment 50,000
Furniture 40,000
Required:
Statement of Cash flow in accordance with IAS 7 for the year ended 30th April 2011. Using
direct method.
Suggested solution:
Gucci statement of cash flows (workings)
Sh. ‗000‘
1. Receipts from customers
Accounts receivable balance b/f 230,000
Sales for 2013 4,395,000 4,395,000
Accounts receivables balance c/f (210,000)
Cash collected from customers 4,415,000
Question:
a) In recent years, many financial analysts have commented on a growing disillusionment
with the usefulness and reliability of the information contained in some companies‘
income statements.
Required:
Discuss the extent to which a company‘s statement of cashflows may be more useful and reliable
than its income statement. (6marks)
b) The following information has been extracted from the financial statements of Texco
limited:
Current liabilities:
Trade payables 700 800
Proposed dividend 700 600
Tax 1,040 2,440 685
2,085
21,410
17,600
Additional information:
1. Non-current assets:
Property Plant Total
Sh‖000‖ Sh‖000‖ Sh‖000‖
At 30 September2009
Cost 8,400 10,800 19,200
Depreciation 1,300 3,400 4,700
Net book value 7,100 7,400 14,500
At 30 September 2010
Cost 11,200 13,400 24,600
Depreciation 1,540 4,900 6,440
Net book value 9,660 8,500 18,160
Suggested solution:
a) Preference of cash flow statement over income statement.
Cash flow statement explicitly indicates how a firm sources for funds and also how it is
used. Income statement on the other hand does not clearly indicate sources and
application of funds.
As opposed to income statement, statement of cash flow may guard against creative
accounting with income statement, especially using basis of accounting, companies may
overstate revenues e.g. By including gains on disposal as part of revenue when in fact this
forms part of other comprehensive income.
Some corporations fail due to poor working capital management. There is no deliberate
effort in income statement to indicate in working capital items. This is well covered in
statement of cash flows especially using the indirect method in presenting statement of
cashflows.
Ordinarily, items not involving movement of cash e.g. depreciation; amortization and
effect of deferred tax would loosely part of sunk cost. Income statement takes into
account cognizance of such items before matching principle However, such items
especially depreciation and amortization may not have any bearing on future planning.
b)
NCA (cost)
Balance b/d 19 Disposal 2
200 600
Addition 8 Balance c/d 2
000 4600
27 27
200 200
v. dividends paid
Statement of cashflows
Introduction
Financial statement analysis is the application of analytical tools and techniques to ‗general
purpose ‗financial statements and related data to derive estimates and be useful in business
analysis.
Financial statement analysis is an integral part of business analysis. Business analysis is the
process of evaluating a company‘s economic prospect and risk.
i. Industry analysis
It assesses industry prospect and degree of actual and potential competition facing a company.
b) Accounting analysis
This is the process of evaluating the extent to which a company‘s accounting reflects economic
reality.
b) Financial analysis
It‘s the Use of financial statements to analyze a company‘s financial position in performance and
to assess future financial performance. Financial statement analysis consists of three broad areas.
- Profitability analysis
This is the evaluation of a company‘s return on investment. It focuses on a company‘s sources
and level of profits and involves identifying and measuring impact of various profitability
avenues.
- Risk analysis
This is the evaluation of a company‘s ability to meet its commitments. Risk analysis involves
assessing solvency and liquidity of a company along with its earnings variability.
- Analysis of sources and uses of funds.
d) Prospective analysis
It‘s the forecasting of future payoffs typically earnings, cashflows etc. this analysis draws on
accounting analysis, financial analysis and business environmental and strategy analysis. The
output of prospective analysis is a set of expected future payoffs used to estimate company‘s
value.
A company‘s financial statements and related disclosures give information about four major
activities.
1) Planning activities
A company‘s goals and objectives are captured in a business that describes the purpose, strategy
and tactics for its activities. The business plan assists managers in focusing the efforts in
identifying expected opportunities and obstacles
2) Financing activities
A company requires financing to carry out its business plan. Financing activities refer to methods
that companies use to raise funds to pay for these things.
There are two main sources of external financing.
- Lenders (creditors)
- Shareholders (investors)
Out of the sources of finance comes payment to lenders (interest) and dividends to shareholders.
3) Investing activities
This refers to a company‘s acquisition and maintenance of investments for purposes of selling
products and providing services for the purpose of investing cash.
Investments in land , buildings, equipments, legal rights, inventory and human capital,
information systems and similar assets are the purpose of conducting company‘s business
operations and as such they are called operating assets.
Financial assets on the other hand are the assets such as bonds, equity stock and money market
funds which the company invests in when it has excess cash.
Investments in short term assets are called current assets. These assets are expected to be
converted to cash in short term. Investment in long term assets is called Net current assets.
4) Operating activities
They represent the carrying out of business plan given the company‘s financing and operating
activities involve at least 5 key components that is research in depth, procurement, production,
marketing and administration.
Financial statements
4. Statement of cashflows
The statement of cashflows reports cash inflows and cash out flows separately for a company‘s
operating, investing and financing activities over a period of time.
Horizontal analysis
This is another term for comparative financial analysis given the right-left or left-right analysis
of account balances. Two techniques of comparative analysis are
a. year to year change
This compares financial statements over a relatively short time period e.g. 2-3yrs and is usually
performed with analysis of year to year changes in individual‘s accounts.
b. Index no. trend analysis
This is useful in comparing financial statements covering more than 2 or 3 years. This method
involves choosing a base period for all times with preselected index no. usually set to 100 e.g.
ABC cash balance as at 31/12 year 1 (base periods is $12000). Its cash balance as at 31/12 year 2
is $8000 dollar using 100 as an index no. for year 1. The index no. for year 2 is 150 and is
computed as
𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑏𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒
× 100
𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑏𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒
This procedure is also called vertical analysis given the up-down or down-up evaluation of
accounts in common size statements. Common financial statement analysis is useful in
understanding the internal make up of financial statements e.g. in analyzing a business. A
common size analysis stresses two factors.
i. Sources of financing-including distribution of financing across current liabilities, net
current liabilities and equity.
ii. Composition of assets including amount for individual and current assets.
Common size statements are especially important for inter-comparisons because financial
statements of different companies are recast in common size format.
Comparison of a company‘s common size statements with those of competitors or industry
averages can highlight the account make up and distribution.
Example of a common size income statement,
XYZ Company.
1998(%) 1999(%)
Sales 100 100
Cost of goods sold 54.4 54.9
Gross profit 45.6 45.1
Selling and distribution cost 26.4 26.9
rent and other costs 6.9 8.4
Restructuring cost 0.0 8.9
Earnings from 14.1 0.9
Interest expense 0.8 0.7
Other income 2.4 0.1
Earnings before income Taxes 15.7 0.3
Provision for income tax 5.3 0.3
Net earnings 10.4 0.0
3. Ratio analysis
A ratio expresses a mathematical relation between two quantities. The important areas of
financial statements where ratios are applied are:-
a) Liquidity-represents credit risk analysis
b) Capital structure -represents credit risk analysis
c) Return on investment
d) Asset utilization
4. Cashflow analysis
This is primary tool used to evaluate sources and uses of funds. Cashflow analysis provides
insight into how a company is obtaining its financing and deploying its resources.
August 2015 www.fb.com/kasnebcsia
199
It is also used in cashflows forecasting and as a part of liquidity analysis.
Specialized analytical tools
Beyond the usual multi-purpose tools of financial analysis are a variety of special purpose tools.
These includes those directed at specific financial statements or segments or at a particular
industry e.g. occupancy capacity analysis in hospitals, hostels, hotels or airlines analysis. Special
purpose tools also include some types of cash forecasting analysis, statement of valuation of
gross profit and earnings power analysis.
Industry analysis
This is a situation where within a specific period, the performance of the company compared
against other companies in the same industry.
Trend analysis
This analysis the performance of a company‘s over time.
A useful way of studying financial statements is to express income statement and statements of
financial position figures as a % of subtotals e.g. gross profit as a % of sales or fixed asset as a %
of total assets. This method is called common size statement approach.
USERS OF RATIOS
There are a vast number of parties interested in analyzing financial statements including
shareholders, lenders, customers, employees, government, and competitors. In many occasions,
they will be interested in different things therefore there is no any definite, all-encompassing list
of points for analysis that would be useful to all these stakeholders. However, it is possible to
construct a series of ratios that together will provide all of them with something that they find
relevant and from which they can investigate further if necessary.
These measure firm‘s ability to meet its short-term maturing obligations as and when they fall
due. The lower the ratio, the higher the liquidity risk and vice versa. Failure to meet short term
liabilities due to lack of liquidity may lead to poor credit worthiness, litigation by creditors and
insolvency.
These measure extent to which a company uses its assets which have been financed by non
owner supplied funds. They measure financial risk of the company. The higher the ratio, the
higher the financial risk. Gearing refers to the amount of debt finance a company uses relative to
its equity finance.
3. Activity ratios
These measure the efficiency with which a firm uses its assets to generate sales. They are also
called turnover ratios as they indicate the rate at which assets are converted into sales.
1. LIQUIDITY RATIOS
Current ratio
𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜 =
𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑙𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠
Current ratio of more than one means that a company has more current assets than current
liabilities.
This is calculated by dividing total current liabilities excluding stock by current liabilities. A firm
with a satisfactory current ratio may actually be in a poor liquidity position when inventories
form most of the total current assets.
This shows number of times earnings by a company cover its current payments. The higher the
ratio, the lower the gearing position and thus the lower the financial risk.
3. PROFITABILITY RATIOS
Capital employed consists of shareholders funds (ordinary share capital, preference share capital,
share premium and retained earnings) and long term debts. Capital employed can also be
calculated as fixed assets plus net working capital.
221
STUDYTEXT
Gross profit margin
This ratio shows how well cost of production has been controlled in relation to distribution and
administration costs.
𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑡
𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑡 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑖𝑛 = 𝑥100
𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑡
𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑡 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑖𝑛 = 𝑥100
𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
Return on investment
These measures the efficiency with which a company uses its total funds in capital employed to
generate returns to owner‘s funds.
Net profit after tax
Return on investment = 𝑥100
Capital employed
𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑠
𝐶𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑟’𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑦 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜 = 𝑥𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑑𝑎𝑦𝑠 𝑖𝑛 𝑎 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟
𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡 𝑝𝑢𝑟𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑠
𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑐𝑘
S𝑡𝑜𝑐𝑘𝑑𝑎𝑦𝑠 𝑜𝑟 𝑖𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑦 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑑 = 𝑥 𝑁𝑜. 𝑜𝑓 𝑑𝑎𝑦𝑠 𝑖𝑛 𝑎 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟
𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑠
The inventory conversion period is the total time needed to produce and sell the product. It
includes:
a) Raw material conversion period.
b) Work-in-Process conversion period.
c) Finished goods conversion period.
The debtors‘ conversion period is the time required to collect the outstanding amount from
customers.
A firm may acquire resources on credit and defer payments. Payables may thus arise. The
payables deferral period is the length of time the firm is able to defer payments on purchase of
resources. The difference between the payables deferral period and the sum of the inventory
conversion period and receivable conversion period is referred to as the operating/cash
conversion cycle.
1. Inventory conversion period.
It is the sum of raw material conversion period, working in progress conversion period and
finished goods conversion period.
Raw material conversion period. - It is the average time period taken to convert raw
material into work in Process.
Raw material conversion period = Raw material inventory / (Raw material consumption/
360)
Working in process conversion period. - It is the average time taken to complete the semi-
finished or work in process.
Finished goods conversion period.- It is the time taken to sale the finished goods .
Finished goods conversion period = Finished goods inventory/ (cost of sales/ 360)
It is the time taken to convert the debtors to cash. It represents the aver age collection period.
It is the average time taken by the firm to pay its suppliers / creditors.
Summary
Inventory conversion period + Debtors conversion period – Creditors deferral period =Net
operating cycle
Example
The following information relates to Mutongoi Limited.
Sh.000
Purchase of raw material 6,700
Usage of raw material 6,500
Sale of finished goods (all on credit) 25,000
Cost of sales(Finished goods) 18,000
Average creditors 1,400
Average raw materials stock 1,200
Average work in progress 1,000
Average finished goods stock 2,100
Average debtors 4,700
Required:
The length of the operating cash cycle.
Solution.
Raw material conversion period = Raw material inventory / (Raw material consumption/ 360)
= (1,200/6,500) × 365
= 67days
Work in process conversion period = Working process inventory / (Cost of production /360)
August 2015 www.fb.com/kasnebcsia
207
= (1000/18000) × 365
=20 days
𝐹𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑒𝑑 𝑔𝑜𝑜𝑑𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑑 = 𝐹𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑒𝑑 𝑔𝑜𝑜𝑑𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑦/ (𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠/ 360)
= (2100/18000) × 365
=43 days
= (4700/25000) × 365
=69 days
= (1400/6700) × 365
= 76 days
Length of operating cycle.
Inventory conversion period.
Raw material conversion period 67
Work in process conversion period 20
Finished goods conversion period 43 130
Debtors conversion period 69
Gross working capital cycle 199
Less: Creditor deferral period (76)
Net Cash Operating cycle 123
Sales
Fixed assets turnover =
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑓𝑖𝑥𝑒𝑑 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
224 FINANCIACCOUNTING
STUDYTEXT
August 2015 www.fb.com/kasnebcsia
208
5. INVESTMENT OR EQUITY RATIOS
Fast forward - These are used to evaluate the overall performance of a company
Earnings Per Share (EPS)
This indicates the amount shareholders expect to generate in form of earnings for every share
invested. It shows profitability of a company on a per share basis.
𝑅𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑑 𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠
𝐷𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑑 𝑅𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜 = 𝑥100
𝐸𝑎𝑟𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠 𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑠𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑜𝑙𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑠
Dividend cover
Earnings per share (EPS)
𝐷𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑑 𝑐𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟 =
𝐷𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑎𝑟𝑒 (𝐷𝑃𝑆)
Earnings yield
This measures the potential return that shareholders expect to earn for every share invested in a
company. It evaluates the shareholders returns in relation to the market value of a share.
STUDYTEXT
Dividend yield
This ratio measures how much an investor expects to receive from cash dividends for every share
purchased or invested in a company.
Dividend per share (DPS)
𝐷𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑑 𝑌𝑖𝑒𝑙𝑑 = 𝑥100
𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑘𝑒𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑎𝑟𝑒 (𝑀𝑃𝑆)
LIMITATIONS OF RATIOS
Subjectivity
Ratios are subjective to accounting information that depends on the accounting policies adopted
by a particular organization hence making it impossible for cross sectional analysis if a company
uses different accounting policies. It is difficult to categorize firms due to diversifications i.e.
some companies have more than one line of business and thus will fall into several industries
thus difficult in ratio comparison.
Irrelevance
Ratios are historical figures which may irrelevant in making future decisions.
Ambiguity
Different people will use different stances to describe financial information e.g. including
preference share capital in equity or return on capital being referred to as gross capital employed.
Usefulness
Ratios are computed at a specific point in time. By the time they are analyzed for decision
making, circumstances may have changed thus ratios are only useful in the short term
Monopoly
For a company without competitor, it may not be .possible to analyze its performance with other
companies in the same industry.
Sales 2311
Cost of goods sold 1344
Depreciation 276
Earnings before interest and Tax 691
Interest paid 141
Taxable income 550
Taxes (34%) 187
Net income 363
Dividends 121
Retained earnings 242
Required: calculate the key ratios the financial statements above and state the importance of the
ratios calculated.
Solution:
a) Current ratio.
𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜 =
𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑙𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠
708
= 1.31 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠
540
The higher the current ratio, the better the company is in covering current liabilities. But
at the same time it may mean an inefficient use of assets such as having excess inventory.
b) Quick (acid test ratio)
Base inventory is the least record of current assets, the acid test ratio doesn‘t take consideration
of inventory and therefore this ratio is written as
𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠 − 𝑖𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑦
𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑙𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠
708 − 422
= 0.53 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠
540
In this case the company has fewer current assets covering current liabilities.
c) Cash ratio
A very short term creditor may be interested in the cash inventory.
𝑐𝑎𝑠
𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑙𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠
98
= 0.18 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠
540
d)
e) Net working capital to total assets
𝑛𝑒𝑡 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙
𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
708 − 540
× 100 = 4.7%
3588
Since net working capital is frequently viewed as a ratio of short term liquidity of a firm, it is
measured relative to total assets. A relatively low value may indicate relatively low liquidity
levels.
f) Interval measure
This assumes operations were disrupted but the company is still compelled to pay some short-
term obligations. It tries to find out how much will current assets cover daily operating costs.
457
= = 0.15 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠
457 + 2591
𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 + 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜 =
𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑒
691 + 276
= = 6.9 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠
141
3. Asset management/turnover ratio
Sometimes called asset neutralization ratios, the ratios in this category are intended to describe
how efficiently or intensely a firm uses its assets to generate sales.
a) Inventory turnover and Day sales in inventory
𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑔𝑜𝑜𝑑𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑑
𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑦 𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟 =
𝐶𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑖𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑦
1344
= = 3.2 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠
422
Inventory was turned 3.2 times. It may also be imperative to use average inventory figures if they
are available.
b) Day sales inventory
365
=
𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑦 𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟
365
= = 114 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠
32
It tells that on average inventory sits in store for 114 days before it is sold.
c) Receivables turn over
This measures how fast receivables are collected.
𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
𝐴𝑐𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑠
2311
= 12.3 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠
188
This means that outstanding credit were collected and reloaded 12.3 times during the years.
4. Profitability measures
These measures are intended to measure how efficiently the firm uses its assets and how
efficiently the firm manages its operations. The focus in the group is on the bottom line i.e.
income
a. Profit margin
𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒
𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
363
= 15.7%
2311
b. Return on assets
𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
363
= 10.12%
3588
c. Return on equity
𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑦
363
= 14%
2591
Du-Pont identity
This was developed by du-Pont Company of USA. Du-Pont identity asserts that R.O.E is
affected by 3 things
- Operating efficiency (as measured by profit margin)
- Assets use efficiency (as measured by total assets turn over)
- Financial leverage (as measured by equity multiplier)
v) The ‗plug‘
After the firm has a sales forecast and an estimate of required spending on assets, some amount
of new financing will be necessary i.e. the statement of financial position will no longer balance.
Since new financing will be necessary to cover all of the projected capital spending, a financial
plug valuable must be selected. The plug is the designated source or sources of external
financing needed to deal with any shortfall 9 or surplus) in financing and therefore the SOFP in
to balance.
vi) The plan will have to state explicitly the economic environment in which the firm expects to
reside over the life of the project.
August 2015 www.fb.com/kasnebcsia
218
EXTERNAL FINANCING AND GROWTH
External financing needs and growth are obviously related. All other things are the same. The
higher the growth rate in sales/assets, the greater will be the need for external financing.
𝑅𝑂𝐴 × 𝑏
𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑔𝑟𝑜𝑤𝑡 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 =
1 − 𝑅𝑂𝐴 × 𝑏
𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑡
𝑅𝑂𝐴 =
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
Example:
Assume net income is sh.66M. Total assets are 500M and of the 66M, 44M was retained.
Calculate internal growth rate or the maximum growth rate that can be attained with no external
financing?
66
𝑅𝑂𝐴 = = 0.132
500
44
𝑏= = 0.69
66
0.132 × 0.67
𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑔𝑟𝑜𝑤𝑡 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 = = 0.0097
1 − 0.132 × 0.67
= 9.7%
Therefore the company can expand at a maximum rate of 9.7% per year without external
financing
.
66
𝑅𝑂𝐸 = = 0.264
250
0.264 × 0.67
𝑆𝐺𝑅 =
1 − 0.264 × 0.67
= 21.36%
The company can expand at a maximum rate of 21.36% per year without external equity
financing. The company wills most likely increase its equity through retained earnings.
However, if the company doesn‘t have sufficient R/E it will have to borrow to finance growth
but still not use external equity. In the above example ROE, plough back ratio i.e. 0.67 is the
same as in the earlier illustration.
Determinants of growth
1. Profit margin
-An increase in profit margin will increase the firm‘s ability
2. Dividend policy
-A decrease in the percentage of net income paid out as a dividend will increase the retention
ratio. This increases the internally generated equity and therefore increases sustainability.
3. Financial policy
-An increase in D: E ratio increases the firm‘s financial leverage. Since this makes additional
debt financing available, it increases the sustainable growth rate.
4. Total asset turnover
-An increase in the firms total asset turnover increases the sales generated for each dollar in
asset. This increases the firms need for new assets as sales growth and thereby increases SGR
Financial distress
Financial distress indicates a condition when promises to creditors of a company are broken or
honored with difficulty. Sometimes it leads to bankruptcy.
Cost of financial distress
Bankruptcy cost
Includes audit fees, legal fees and management fees
Reduction in management efficiency
Financial distress in companies leads to problems that can reduce efficiency of management.
This is due to the shift of focus from long term to short term gains among managers, principally
due to diminished commitment. Also good staff leaves the firm for better opportunities.
Conflict of interest between shareholders and creditors
As the firms liquidation values slips below its debt, its shareholders interest that the company
invests in risky projects which increases the probability of the firm‘s value to go below debt.
Risky project are not in the interest of creditors, since they increase the probability of the firms
value to decrease further, leaving them with even less. Since these projects do not necessarily
August 2015 www.fb.com/kasnebcsia
220
have a positive NPV, costs may rise from lost profits. Management may also choose to distribute
to save money from the creditors.
High cost of capital
With financial distress of a company short term loans from creditors and banks will be given to
the firm at higher interest rates because of poor credit standing.
Altman‘s Z-score
It is a quantitative method of determining a company‘s financial health and likehood of
bankruptcy.
The Z-score model is the 1960‘s brain child of professor Edward Altman of NYU. It uses 8
variables that are EBIT, total assets, and net sales, market value of equity, total liabilities, current
assets, current liabilities and retained earnings.
The formula for the Z-score:
𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙
𝑤𝑒𝑟𝑒, 𝑥1 =
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
𝑅𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑑 𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠
𝑥2 =
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
𝑥3 =
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
𝑥5 =
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
August 2015 www.fb.com/kasnebcsia
221
Interpretation of Altman‘s Z-score
Z-score above 3 means a company is considered safe based on financial figures only.
Z-score between 2.7 and 2.99 means this is the zone where one should exercise caution. It could
mean the performance of the company is at risk.
Z-score between 1.8 and 2.7 means there is a good chance of a company going bankruptcy
within 2 years of operations from the date of financial statement/figures.
Z-score below 1.8 means the probability of financial embarrassment is very high and chances of
the firm surviving are minimal.
Question:
Using the financial statement of 2011 of Bridgeview Company, Calculate the Z-score for the
company and interprete the results.
Solution
𝑍 − 𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑒 = 1.2𝑥1 + 1.4𝑥2 + 3.3𝑥3 + 0.6𝑥4 + 1.0𝑥5
𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝐴 − 𝐶𝐿
𝑥1 = =
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
708 − 540
= = 0.047
3588
𝑅𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑑 𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠
𝑥2 =
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
2041
= = 0.569
3588
𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
𝑥3 =
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
691
= = 0.193
3588
= 3.5799
QUESTION
(a) Outline two types of information which could be obtained from the following sources:
i. Proxy statement (2 marks)
ii. Corporate press release (2 marks)
iii. Annual reports to regulators (2 marks)
(b) The top management of Zedrock Limited has provided you with the following financial statements
relating to its two divisions, alpha and beta, for the year ended 30 June 2012
Income statement for the year ended 30 June 2012
Alpha Division Beta Division
Sh.‖millions‖ Sh.‖millions‖
Revenue 4,000 6,000
Cost of sales (3,000) (4,800)
Gross profit 1,000 1,200
Expenses:
Distribution costs 200 150
Administrative expenses 290 250
Interest paid 10 (500) 400 (800)
Profit before tax 500 400
Income tax expense (120) (90)
Profit after tax 380 310
Dividend paid (150) (100)
Retained profit for the year 230 210
Retained profit brought forward 220 2,480
Retained profit carried forward 450 2,6900
Additional information:
1. The two divisions sell goods on both cash and credit terms. On average, the credit sales account for
80% of the total sales while purchases account for 90%
2. The cash flow from operating activities for the two divisions are sh.750 millions and sh.800 million
respectively.
3. The division deal with electronic goods.
Required:
(i) Common size income statement for the year ended 30th June 2012 (6 marks)
(ii) Common size statement of financial position as at 30th June 2012 (6 marks)
(iii)Comment on the performance of the two divisions and state which division and state is better
(2 marks)
(Total: 20 marks)
Suggested solution:
a) Proxy statements
A proxy is a means whereby a shareholder authorizes another person to act for him or her at a meeting of
shareholders. A proxy statement contains information necessary for shareholders in voting on matters for
which the proxy is solicited.
Proxy statements contain pertinent information regarding a company including:-
viii. The identity of shareholders owning 5% or more of the outstanding shares.
ix. Biography information on the BOD
x. compensation arrangement with officers and directors
xi. Employees benefit plans and certain transactions with officers and directors related parties.
xii. Voting procedures and information
xiii. Background information about the company‘s nominated directors
xiv. Executive compensation
Corporate press release
These are news that follows within the publishing requirements of a company. They includes:-
iii. Recent financial statements released and key performances
iv. Any new important information like change of management, new products or strategies
Annual report to Regulators
These should include:-
iv. Mergers, consolidation, acquisition and similar matters
v. Financial statements
vi. Audited accounts and reports
Zedrock Limited
Common size Income statement for the year ended 30 June 2112
Zedrock Limited
Statement of financial position as at 30 June 2012:
Alpha Division Beta Division
% % % %
Non-current assets at cost:
Land and buildings 38 63.5
Furniture and motor vehicles 19 12.6
57 76.1
Current assets:
Inventory 12.8 10.2
Trade receivables 27.0 9.5
Financial assets 3.2 2.9
Cash at bank - 43 1.3 23.9
Total assets 100 100
Based on the income statement, Alpha division appears to be better than Beta division in terms of gross
profit, net profit margin and profits retained.
Based on the statement of financial position, Beta division seems to be better because it has more capital
than alpha and its non-current asset base is better.
Credit score:
Example of credit score: these vary from country to country or from agency to agency. For
example for standard and poor‘s rating for corporations are:
AA - a very good rating. Company is reliable, but with a bit more risk than AAA.
The list goes on to A‘S….All the way to B‘s and lastly to NR which is not rated. There are also
ratings for individuals by companies.
1. Credit rating agencies do not downgrade companies promptly enough. For example,
Enron‘s grading remained at investment grade four days before the company went into
bankruptcy
2. Large corporate rating agencies have been criticized for having too familiar relationship
with company management, possibly opening themselves to undue influence or
vulnerable of being misled
3. While often accused of being too close company management of their existing clients,
CRA‘s have been accused of engaging in heavy-handed ―blackmail‖ tactics in order to
solicit business from new clients, and lowering ratings for those firms.
4. Agencies are sometimes accused of being oligopolists, because barriers to market entry
are high and agency business is itself reputation-based (and the finance industry pays
little attention to an agency that is not widely recognized)
i. Being aware of the factors that can improve business credit rating. There are several
factors that influence a business credit including paying credit in time.
ii. Make sure your suppliers including lenders are reporting your credit because good
information about your organization could be missing
iii. Repair the damage by paying of delinquent debts and paying other debts in time
August 2015 www.fb.com/kasnebcsia
226
iv. Improve your statement of financial position by first analyzing your credit score and
working on the ratios which may indicate poor credit standing
v. Set a goal: having your ideal credit score written down will give you something concrete
to strive for.
This is an accounting concept bases on the principle that income is only recognized after
capital has been maintained or there has been a full recovery of cost
Capital maintenance has been reached if the amount of the company‘s capital at the end
of the period is unchanged from that at the beginning of the period
The two basic definitions of capital maintenance are financial capital maintenance and
physical capital maintenance.
According to IFRS, under definition of capital maintenance, a profit is earned only if the
amount of the net asset at the end of the period exceeds the amount at the beginning of
the period, excluding any inflow from or outflows to owners, such as contributions and
distributions.
It can be measured either in nominal monetary units are constant purchasing power units
The definition of physical capital maintenance according IFRS implies that a profit is
earned only if the enterprise‘s productive or operating capacity at the end of the period
exceeds the capacity at the beginning of the period excluding any owners‘ contribution or
distribution.
RELEVANCE
Relevance in the context of financial reporting means that the information must possess
predictive value confirmation of investor expectations about future cash-generating ability.
It should be both predictive and confirmative. For example, if net income and its components
confirm investor expectations about a company's future cash-generating ability, then net income
has confirmatory value for investors. This confirmation also can be useful in predicting the
company's future cash-generating ability as expectations are revised.
FAITHFUL REPRESENTATION
Faithful representation exists when there is agreement between a measure or description and the
phenomenon it purports to represent. For example, assume that the term inventory in the balance
sheet of a retail company is understood by external users to represent items that are intended for
sale in the ordinary course of business. If inventory includes, say, machines used to produce
inventory, then it lacks faithful representation.
To break it down further, faithful representation requires that information be complete, neutral,
and free from material error. A depiction of an economic phenomenon is complete if it includes
all information that is necessary for faithful representation of the economic phenomena that it
purports to represent. Omitting a portion of that information can cause the depiction to be false
or misleading and thus not helpful to the users of the information.
NEUTRALITY
The information being relied on should be free from bias. In that regard, neutral with respect to
parties potentially affected. It is highly related to the establishment of accounting standards.
Changes in accounting standards can lead to adverse economic consequences for certain
companies, their investors and creditors, and other interest groups. Accounting standards should
be established with overall societal goals and specific objectives in mind and should try not to
achieve particular social outcomes or favor particular groups or companies.
It‘s the ability to help users see similarities and differences among events and conditions. it is
import for investors and creditors to compare information among companies to make their
resource allocation decisions.
CONSISTENCY
It permits valid comparisons between different periods of accounting practices over time. The
predictive and confirmatory value of information is enhanced if users can compare the
performance of a company over time. In the Dell financial statements and disclosure notes,
notice that disclosure Note 1 includes a summary of significant accounting policies. If Dell were
to change one of these policies, new numbers might not be comparable to numbers measured
under a previous policy. To be sure readers are aware of the change; Dell would need to provide
a full disclosure in the notes to the financial statements.
VERIFIABILITY
It implies a consensus among different measurers. For example, the historical cost of a piece of
land to be reported in a company's balance sheet usually is highly verifiable. The cost can be
traced to an exchange transaction, the purchase of the land. However, the fair value of that land
is much more difficult to verify. Appraisers could differ in their assessment of fair value. The
term objectivity often is linked to verifiability. The historical cost of the land is objective and
easy to verify, but the land's fair value is subjective, influenced by the measurer's past experience
and prejudices. A measurement that is subjective is difficult to verify, which makes it less
reliable to users.
TIMELINESS
Information should be available to users early enough to allow its use in the decision process.
Information is timely when it is available to users early enough to allow them to use it in their
decision process. The need for timely information requires that companies provide information
to external users on a periodic basis. To enhance timeliness, the SEC requires its registrants to
submit financial statement information on a quarterly as well as on an annual basis for each fiscal
year.
UNDERSTANDABILITY
It means that users must understand the information within the context of the decision being
made. This is a user-specific quality because users will differ in their ability to comprehend any
set of information. The overriding objective of financial reporting is to provide comprehensible
information to those who have a reasonable understanding of business and economic activities
and are willing to study the information.
1) Quality of accounting
Accounting information, for usefulness should be free of bias and errors (of commission
and omission). By large, the quality of accounting information will depend on the
qualification and experience of accounting staff employed to keep the books and prepare
the accounts
2) Management decision
Management decision may be influenced by their relationship with stakeholders of the
organization. They may engage in transactions that are not of the benefit of the
shareholders or which are not in tandem with goal congruence
ACCOUNTING SCANDALS
Accounting scandals are political or business scandals which arise with the disclosure of
financial misdeeds by trusted executives of corporations or governments. Such misdeeds
typically involve complex methods for misusing or misdirecting funds, overstating revenues,
understating expenses, overstating the value of corporate assets or underreporting the existence
of liabilities, sometimes with the cooperation of officials in other corporations or affiliates.
In public companies, this type of "creative accounting" can amount to fraud, and investigations
are typically launched by government oversight agencies
Creative Accounting
The technique of Creative accounting has changed over time. As accounting standards change,
the techniques that will work will also change. Many changes in accounting standards are meant
to block particular ways of manipulating accounts, which means that intent on creative
accounting need to find new ways of doing things. At the same time, other well mentioned
changes in accounting standards open up new opportunities for creative accounting.
According to critic David Ehrenstein, the term Creative Accounting was first used in 1968 in
the film The Producers by Mel Brooks. Many creative accounting techniques change the main
numbers show in the financial statements, but make themselves evident elsewhere, most often in
the notes to the accounts. The term creative accounting as generally understood refers to
systematic misrepresentation of the true income and assets of corporations and other
organizations. Creative accounting is at the root of a number of accounting scandals.
The term window dressing has similar meaning when applied to accounts, but is a broader term
that can be applied to other areas. it is often used to describe the manipulation of investment
portfolio performance numbers. In the context of accounts, window dressing is more likely than
creative accounting to imply illegal or fraudulent practices
Earnings Management
Earnings management occurs when managers use judgment in financial reporting and in
structuring transactions to alter financial reports to either mislead some stakeholders about the
underlying economic performance of a company of influence contractual outcomes that depend
on reported accounting numbers. Earnings management involves the artificial increase of
revenues, profits or earnings per share figures through aggressive accounting tactics.
Aggressive earnings management is a form of fraud and differs from reporting error. The main
forms of earnings management are:
i. Personal incentives
ii. Bonus related pay
iii. Benefits from shares and share options
iv. Job security
v. Personal satisfaction
vi. Cover-up fraud
vii. Tax management
viii. Management Buy outs
Fraudulent financial reporting need not be the result of a grand plan or conspiracy. It may
be that management representatives rationalize the appropriateness of a material
August 2015 www.fb.com/kasnebcsia
232
misstatement, for example, as an aggressive rather than indefensible interpretation of
complex accounting rules, or as a temporary misstatement of financial statements,
including interim statements, expected to be corrected later when operational results
improve.
o Embezzling receipts
o stealing assets, or
o Causing an entity to pay for goods or services that have not been received.
Misappropriation of assets may be accompanied by false or misleading records or documents,
possibly created by circumventing controls. The scope of this section includes only those
misappropriations of assets for which the effect of the misappropriation causes the financial
statements not to be fairly presented.
1. Revenue
Revenues can be misstated by for example recording deferred revenue and unearned
revenue as part of the current revenue already earned. For example recording rent
received in advance as income instead of liability.
Revenue can also be accelerated by for example recognizing service agreements tied to
sales as part of revenue even before actual service is carried on non-current assets.
Further, non operating revenue such as the gain on disposal of non-current assets may be
lumped together with operating revenue when in effect it should be part of other
comprehensive income.
Revenue can also be understated if the objective is to evade tax.
2. Expenses
Depending on what the manipulators are bent on achieving, the expenses may be
overstated or understated. For example, with a view to delay expenses and hence
understate them, an organization may choose to capitalize some purchases instead of
expensing them. Understating closing stock may also help overstate cost of sales and
hence ―depress‖ net income.
4. Cashflow statement
A company may ―park‖ long term investment under cash and cash equivalent so as to
apparently overstate the cash balances
There are a number of mechanisms designed to prevent strategic manipulation such as:
a) An independent audit
The auditor expresses an opinion as to whether the financial statements conform GAAP,
the estimates are reasonable, and the data includes no material errors. The auditor also
examines the firm‘s internal control and reports any weaknesses to the audit committee of
the board of directors
e) Regulators
Regulators can use fines as well as criminal prosecution as a deterrent.
f) General market scrutiny
Business journalists, financial analysts, short sellers, and unions are constantly trying to
identify manipulative behavior.
QUESTION:
a) With reference to IAS 36 (Impairment of assets), identify any four circumstances that
may indicate that an asset has been impaired.
There has been significant decrease in the market value of the asset in excess of
the normal process of depreciation
b) In the context of the International Accounting Standards Board’s framework for the
preparation and presentation of financial statements, identify and briefly explain any
four qualitative characteristics of financial statements
Qualitative characteristics are the attributes that make the information provided in financial
statements more useful to users. The major qualitative characteristics are:
i) Understability
An essential quality of the information provided bin financial statements is that it is readily
understandable by users, for those purpose, users are assumed to have reasonable knowledge of
business and economic activities and accounting and a willingness to study information with
reasonable diligence however information should not be excluded merely on the ground that it‘s
too difficult for certain users to understand
ii. Relevance
To be useful, information must be relevant to the decision making needs of users information has
the quantity of relevance when it influences the economic decisions of users by helping them to
evaluate past, present of future events or continuing or collecting the past evaluations
iii. Materiality
The relevance of information is affected by its nature and materiality; in some cases the nature of
information alone is sufficient to determine its relevance. For example the reporting of a new
segment may affect the assessment of the risks and opportunities facing the entity irrespective of
materiality of the results achieved by the new segment in the reporting period. Information is
material if its omission or n=misstatement could be influence the economic decisions of users
taken on the basis of the financial statements
iv. Reliability
To be useful information has to be reliable. Information has the quality of reliability when its
free from material error and bias and can be depended upon by users to represent t faithfully that
which is either purports to represent or could reasonably be expected to represent
v. Comparability
Users must be able to c0pompare the financial statement of an entity through time in order to
identify trends in its financial position and performance. Users must also be able to compare the
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) announced in April 2001 that its
accounting standards would be designated "International Financial Reporting
Standards" (IFRS). Also in April 2001, the IASB announced that it would adopt all of
the International Accounting Standards issued by the IASC.
It outlines the accounting when an acquirer obtains control of a business (e.g. an acquisition or
merger). Such business combinations are accounted for using the 'acquisition method', which
generally requires assets acquired and liabilities assumed to be measured at their fair values at
the acquisition date.
A revised version of IFRS 3 was issued in January 2008 and applies to business combinations
occurring in an entity's first annual period beginning on or after 1 July 2009.
Background
IFRS 3 (2008) replaced IFRS 3 (2004). IFRS 3 (2008) resulted from a joint project with the US
Financial Accounting Standards Board. FASB issued a similar standard in December 2007
(SFAS 141(R)). The revisions result in a high degree of convergence between IFRSs and US
GAAP in these areas, although some potentially significant differences remain.
Summary of IFRS 3:
Scope
Acquirer must be identified. Under IFRS 3, an acquirer must be identified for all business
combinations. [IFRS 3.6]
Scope changes from IFRS 3(2004). IFRS 3(2008) applies to combinations of mutual entities
and combinations without consideration (dual listed shares). These are excluded from IFRS
3(2004).
* Annual Improvements to IFRSs 2011–2013 Cycle, effective for annual periods beginning on or
after 1 July 2014, amends this scope exclusion to clarify that is applies to the accounting for the
formation of a joint arrangement in the financial statements of the joint arrangement itself.
Acquisition method. The acquisition method (called the 'purchase method' in the 2004 version
of IFRS 3) is used for all business combinations. [IFRS 3.4]
1. Identification of the 'acquirer' – the combining entity that obtains control of the acquiree
[IFRS 3.7]
2. Determination of the 'acquisition date' – the date on which the acquirer obtains control of
the acquiree [IFRS 3.8]
3. Recognition and measurement of the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed
and any non-controlling interest (NCI, formerly called minority interest) in the acquiree
4. Recognition and measurement of goodwill or a gain from a bargain purchase
Measurement of acquired assets and liabilities. Assets and liabilities are measured at their
acquisition-date fair value (with a limited number of specified exceptions). [IFRS 3.18]
Acquired intangible assets. Must always be recognised and measured at fair value. There is no
'reliable measurement' exception.
Goodwill
the aggregate of (i) the acquisition-date fair value of the consideration transferred, (ii) the
amount of any NCI, and (iii) in a business combination achieved in stages (see Below),
the acquisition-date fair value of the acquirer's previously-held equity interest in the
acquiree; and
the net of the acquisition-date amounts of the identifiable assets acquired and the
liabilities assumed (measured in accordance with IFRS 3). [IFRS 3.32]
If the difference above is negative, the resulting gain is recognised as a bargain purchase in profit
or loss. [IFRS 3.34]
Prior to control being obtained, the investment is accounted for under IAS 28, IAS 31, or IAS 39,
as appropriate. On the date that control is obtained, the fair values of the acquired entity's assets
and liabilities, including goodwill, are measured (with the option to measure full goodwill or
only the acquirer's percentage of goodwill). Any resulting adjustments to previously recognised
assets and liabilities are recognised in profit or loss. Thus, attaining control triggers
remeasurement. [IFRS 3.41-42]
Measurement period
If the initial accounting for a business combination can be determined only provisionally by the
end of the first reporting period, the business combination is accounted for using provisional
values. Adjustments to provisional amounts, and the recognition of newly identified asset and
liabilities, must be made within the 'measurement period' where they reflect new information
obtained about facts and circumstances that were in existence at the acquisition date. [IFRS
3.45] The measurement period cannot exceed one year from the acquisition date and no
adjustments are permitted after one year except to correct an error in accordance with IAS 8.
[IFRS 3.50]
Cost of an acquisition
Measurement. Consideration for the acquisition includes the acquisition-date fair value of
contingent consideration. Changes to contingent consideration resulting from events after the
acquisition date must be recognised in profit or loss. [IFRS 3.58]
Acquisition costs. Costs of issuing debt or equity instruments are accounted for under IAS 32
and IAS 39. All other costs associated with the acquisition must be expensed, including
reimbursements to the acquiree for bearing some of the acquisition costs. Examples of costs to be
expensed include finder's fees; advisory, legal, accounting, valuation and other professional or
consulting fees; and general administrative costs, including the costs of maintaining an internal
acquisitions department. [IFRS 3.53]
Note: Annual Improvements to IFRSs 2010–2012 Cycle changes these requirements for business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after 1 July 2014. Under the amended
requirements, contingent consideration that is classified as an asset or liability is measured at fair
value at each reporting date and changes in fair value are recognised in profit or loss, both for
contingent consideration that is within the scope of IFRS 9/IAS 39 or otherwise.
Where a change in the fair value of contingent consideration is the result of additional
information about facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date, these changes are
accounted for as measurement period adjustments if they arise during the measurement period
(see above). [IFRS 3.58]
If the acquirer and acquiree were parties to a pre-existing relationship (for instance, the acquirer
had granted the acquiree a right to use its intellectual property), this must must be accounted for
separately from the business combination. In most cases, this will lead to the recognition of a
gain or loss for the amount of the consideration transferred to the vendor which effectively
represents a 'settlement' of the pre-existing relationship. The amount of the gain or loss is
measured as follows:
However, where the transaction effectively represents a reacquired right, an intangible asset is
recognised and measured on the basis of the remaining contractual term of the related contract
Other issues
Acquiring additional shares in the subsidiary after control was obtained. This is accounted
for as an equity transaction with owners (like acquisition of 'treasury shares'). Goodwill is not
remeasured.
Disclosure
The acquirer shall disclose information that enables users of its financial statements to evaluate
the nature and financial effect of a business combination that occurs either during the current
reporting period or after the end of the period but before the financial statements are authorised
for issue. [IFRS 3.59]
Among the disclosures required to meet the foregoing objective are the following: [IFRS 3.B64-
66]
Summary of IFRS 7
Overview of IFRS 7
adds certain new disclosures about financial instruments to those currently required by
IAS 32;
replaces the disclosures previously required by IAS 30; and
puts all of those financial instruments disclosures together in a new standard on Financial
Instruments: Disclosures. The remaining parts of IAS 32 deal only with financial
instruments presentation matters.
IFRS requires certain disclosures to be presented by category of instrument based on the IAS 39
measurement categories. Certain other disclosures are required by class of financial instrument.
For those disclosures an entity must group its financial instruments into classes of similar
instruments as appropriate to the nature of the information presented. [IFRS 7.6]
Disclose the significance of financial instruments for an entity's financial position and
performance. [IFRS 7.7] This includes disclosures for each of the following categories:
[IFRS 7.8]
o financial assets measured at fair value through profit and loss, showing separately
those held for trading and those designated at initial recognition
o held-to-maturity investments
o loans and receivables
Items of income, expense, gains, and losses, with separate disclosure of gains and losses
from: [IFRS 7.20(a)]
o financial assets measured at fair value through profit and loss, showing separately
those held for trading and those designated at initial recognition.
o held-to-maturity investments.
o loans and receivables.
o available-for-sale assets.
o financial liabilities measured at fair value through profit and loss, showing
separately those held for trading and those designated at initial recognition.
o financial liabilities measured at amortised cost.
Other disclosures
The fair value hierarchy introduces 3 levels of inputs based on the lowest level of input
significant to the overall fair value (IFRS 7.27A-27B):
Quantitative disclosures
The quantitative disclosures provide information about the extent to which the entity is
exposed to risk, based on information provided internally to the entity's key management
personnel. These disclosures include: [IFRS 7.34]
o summary quantitative data about exposure to each risk at the reporting date
o disclosures about credit risk, liquidity risk, and market risk and how these risks
are managed as further described below
o concentrations of risk
Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk that one party to a financial instrument will cause a loss for the
other party by failing to pay for its obligation. [IFRS 7. Appendix A]
Disclosures about credit risk include: [IFRS 7.36-38]
o maximum amount of exposure (before deducting the value of collateral),
description of collateral, information about credit quality of financial assets that
are neither past due nor impaired, and information about credit quality of financial
assets whose terms have been renegotiated [IFRS 7.36]
o for financial assets that are past due or impaired, analytical disclosures are
required [IFRS 7.37]
o information about collateral or other credit enhancements obtained or called
[IFRS 7.38]
Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that an entity will have difficulties in paying its financial
liabilities. [IFRS 7. Appendix A]
Disclosures about liquidity risk include: [IFRS 7.39]
o a maturity analysis of financial liabilities
o description of approach to risk management
An entity shall disclose information that enables users of its financial statements:
a. to understand the relationship between transferred financial assets that are not
derecognised in their entirety and the associated liabilities; and
b. to evaluate the nature of, and risks associated with, the entity's continuing involvement in
derecognised financial assets. [IFRS 7 42B]
Required disclosures include description of the nature of the transferred assets, nature of
risk and rewards as well as description of the nature and quantitative disclosure depicting
relationship between transferred financial assets and the associated liabilities. [IFRS
7.42D]
Required disclosures include the carrying amount of the assets and liabilities recognised,
fair value of the assets and liabilities that represent continuing involvement, maximum
exposure to loss from the continuing involvement as well as maturity analysis of the
undiscounted cash flows to repurchase the derecognised financial assets. [IFRS 7.42E]
Additional disclosures are required for any gain or loss recognised at the date of transfer
of the assets, income or expenses recognise from the entity's continuing involvement in
the derecognised financial assets as well as details of uneven distribution of proceed from
transfer activity throughout the reporting period. [IFRS 7.42G]
Application guidance
Summary of IFRS 10
Objective
The objective of IFRS 10 is to establish principles for the presentation and preparation of
consolidated financial statements when an entity controls one or more other entities. [IFRS 10:1]
requires a parent entity (an entity that controls one or more other entities) to present
consolidated financial statements
defines the principle of control, and establishes control as the basis for consolidation
set out how to apply the principle of control to identify whether an investor controls an
investee and therefore must consolidate the investee
sets out the accounting requirements for the preparation of consolidated financial
statements
defines an investment entity and sets out an exception to consolidating particular
subsidiaries of an investment entity*.
Key definitions
[IFRS 10:Appendix A]
Consolidated The financial statements of a group in which the assets, liabilities, equity,
financial income, expenses and cash flows of the parent and its subsidiaries are
statements presented as those of a single economic entity
An investor controls an investee when the investor is exposed, or has rights,
Control of an
to variable returns from its involvement with the investee and has the ability
investee
to affect those returns through its power over the investee
An entity that:
Investment entity*
1. obtains funds from one or more investors for the purpose of
August 2015 www.fb.com/kasnebcsia
247
providing those investor(s) with investment management services
2. commits to its investor(s) that its business purpose is to invest funds
solely for returns from capital appreciation, investment income, or
both, and
3. measures and evaluates the performance of substantially all of its
investments on a fair value basis.
Parent An entity that controls one or more entities
Power Existing rights that give the current ability to direct the relevant activities
Rights designed to protect the interest of the party holding those rights
Protective rights
without giving that party power over the entity to which those rights relate
Relevant activities Activities of the investee that significantly affect the investee's returns
Control
An investor controls an investee if and only if the investor has all of the following elements:
[IFRS 10:7]
power over the investee, i.e. the investor has existing rights that give it the ability to
direct the relevant activities (the activities that significantly affect the investee's returns)
exposure, or rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee
the ability to use its power over the investee to affect the amount of the investor's returns.
Power arises from rights. Such rights can be straightforward (e.g. through voting rights) or be
complex (e.g. embedded in contractual arrangements). An investor that holds only protective
rights cannot have power over an investee and so cannot control an investee [IFRS 10:11, IFRS
10:14].
An investor must be exposed, or have rights, to variable returns from its involvement with an
investee to control the investee. Such returns must have the potential to vary as a result of the
investee's performance and can be positive, negative, or both. [IFRS 10:15]
A parent must not only have power over an investee and exposure or rights to variable returns
from its involvement with the investee, a parent must also have the ability to use its power over
the investee to affect its returns from its involvement with the investee. [IFRS 10:17].
Accounting requirements
A parent prepares consolidated financial statements using uniform accounting policies for like
transactions and other events in similar circumstances. [IFRS 10:19]
However, a parent need not present consolidated financial statements if it meets all of the
following conditions: [IFRS 10:4(a)]
Furthermore, post-employment benefit plans or other long-term employee benefit plans to which
IAS 19 Employee Benefits applies are not required to apply the requirements of IFRS 10. [IFRS
10:4(b)]
Consolidation procedures
combine like items of assets, liabilities, equity, income, expenses and cash flows of the
parent with those of its subsidiaries
offset (eliminate) the carrying amount of the parent's investment in each subsidiary and
the parent's portion of equity of each subsidiary (IFRS 3 Business Combinations explains
how to account for any related goodwill)
eliminate in full intragroup assets and liabilities, equity, income, expenses and cash flows
relating to transactions between entities of the group (profits or losses resulting from
intragroup transactions that are recognised in assets, such as inventory and fixed assets,
are eliminated in full).
A reporting entity includes the income and expenses of a subsidiary in the consolidated financial
statements from the date it gains control until the date when the reporting entity ceases to control
The parent and subsidiaries are required to have the same reporting dates, or consolidation based
on additional financial information prepared by subsidiary, unless impracticable. Where
impracticable, the most recent financial statements of the subsidiary are used, adjusted for the
effects of significant transactions or events between the reporting dates of the subsidiary and
consolidated financial statements. The difference between the date of the subsidiary's financial
statements and that of the consolidated financial statements shall be no more than three months
[IFRS 10:B92, IFRS 10:B93]
A reporting entity attributes the profit or loss and each component of other comprehensive
income to the owners of the parent and to the non-controlling interests. The proportion allocated
to the parent and non-controlling interests are determined on the basis of present ownership
interests. [IFRS 10:B94, IFRS 10:B89]
The reporting entity also attributes total comprehensive income to the owners of the parent and
to the non-controlling interests even if this results in the non-controlling interests having a deficit
balance. [IFRS 10:B94]
Changes in a parent's ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in the parent losing
control of the subsidiary are equity transactions (i.e. transactions with owners in their capacity as
owners). When the proportion of the equity held by non-controlling interests changes, the
carrying amounts of the controlling and non-controlling interests area adjusted to reflect the
changes in their relative interests in the subsidiary. Any difference between the amount by which
the non-controlling interests are adjusted and the fair value of the consideration paid or received
is recognised directly in equity and attributed to the owners of the parent.[IFRS 10:23, IFRS
10:B96]
derecognises the assets and liabilities of the former subsidiary from the consolidated
statement of financial position
recognises any investment retained in the former subsidiary at its fair value when control
is lost and subsequently accounts for it and for any amounts owed by or to the former
subsidiary in accordance with relevant IFRSs. That fair value is regarded as the fair value
on initial recognition of a financial asset in accordance with IFRS 9 Financial
[Note: The investment entity consolidation exemption was introduced by Investment Entities,
issued on 31 October 2012 and effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January
2014.]
IFRS 10 contains special accounting requirements for investment entities. Where an entity meets
the definition of an 'investment entity', it does not consolidate its subsidiaries, or apply IFRS 3
Business Combinations when it obtains control of another entity. [IFRS 10:31]
An entity is required to consider all facts and circumstances when assessing whether it is an
investment entity, including its purpose and design. IFRS 10 provides that an investment entity
should have the following typical characteristics [IFRS 10:28]:
The absence of any of these typical characteristics does not necessarily disqualify an entity from
being classified as an investment entity.
Because an investment entity is not required to consolidate its subsidiaries, intragroup related
party transactions and outstanding balances are not eliminated [IAS 24.4, IAS 39.80].
Special requirements apply where an entity becomes, or ceases to be, an investment entity.
[IFRS 10:B100-B101]
The exemption from consolidation only applies to the investment entity itself. Accordingly, a
parent of an investment entity is required to consolidate all entities that it controls, including
those controlled through an investment entity subsidiary, unless the parent itself is an investment
entity. [IFRS 10:33]
Disclosure
Note: This section has been updated to reflect the amendments to IFRS 10 made in June 2012
and October 2012.
IFRS 10 is applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013 [IFRS
10:C1].
IFRS 10 prescribes modified accounting on its first application in the following circumstances:
An entity may apply IFRS 10 to an earlier accounting period, but if doing so it must disclose the
fact that is has early adopted the standard and also apply:
The amendments made by Investment Entities are applicable to annual reporting periods
beginning on or after 1 January 2014 [IFRS 10:C1B]. At the date of initial application of the
amendments, an entity assesses whether it is an investment entity on the basis of the facts and
circumstances that exist at that date and additional transitional provisions apply [IFRS 10:C3B–
C3F].
IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates, and Errors (revised 2003)
IAS 10 Events After the Statement of financial position Date (revised 2003)
Summary of IAS 12
Objective of IAS 12
The objective of IAS 12 (1996) is to prescribe the accounting treatment for income taxes.
Temporary difference: a difference between the carrying amount of an asset or liability and its
tax base.
Taxable temporary difference: a temporary difference that will result in taxable amounts in the
future when the carrying amount of the asset is recovered or the liability is settled.
Deductible temporary difference: a temporary difference that will result in amounts that are
tax deductible in the future when the carrying amount of the asset is recovered or the liability is
settled.
Current tax
Current tax for the current and prior periods is recognised as a liability to the extent that it has
not yet been settled, and as an asset to the extent that the amounts already paid exceed the
amount due. [IAS 12.12] The benefit of a tax loss which can be carried back to recover current
tax of a prior period is recognised as an asset. [IAS 12.13] Current tax assets and liabilities are
measured at the amount expected to be paid to (recovered from) taxation authorities, using the
rates/laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date. [IAS 12.46]
liabilities arising from initial recognition of goodwill for which amortisation is not
deductible for tax purposes;
liabilities arising from the initial recognition of an asset/liability other than in a business
combination which, at the time of the transaction, does not affect either the accounting or
the taxable profit; and
liabilities arising from undistributed profits from investments where the entity is able to
control the timing of the reversal of the difference and it is probable that the reversal will
not occur in the foreseeable future. [IAS 12.39]
A deferred tax asset should be recognised for deductible temporary differences, unused tax losses
and unused tax credits to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against
which the deductible temporary differences can be utilised, unless the deferred tax asset arises
from: [IAS 12.24]
the initial recognition of an asset or liability other than in a business combination which,
at the time of the transaction, does not affect the accounting or the taxable profit.
Deferred tax assets for deductible temporary differences arising from investments in subsidiaries,
associates, branches and joint ventures should be recognised to the extent that it is probable that
the temporary difference will reverse in the foreseeable future and that taxable profit will be
available against which the temporary difference will be utilised. [IAS 12.44]
The carrying amount of deferred tax assets should be reviewed at the end of each reporting
period and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be
available to allow the benefit of part or all of that deferred tax asset to be utilised. Any such
reduction should be subsequently reversed to the extent that it becomes probable that sufficient
taxable profit will be available. [IAS 12.37]
A deferred tax asset should be recognised for an unused tax loss carryforward or unused tax
credit if, and only if, it is considered probable that there will be sufficient future taxable profit
against which the loss or credit carryforwards can be utilised. [IAS 12.34]
Deferred tax assets and liabilities should be measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply
to the period when the asset is realised or the liability is settled (liability method), based on tax
rates/laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the end of the reporting period.
[IAS 12.47] The measurement should reflect the entity's expectations, at the balance sheet date,
as to the manner in which the carrying amount of its assets and liabilities will be recovered or
settled. [IAS 12.51]
Current and deferred tax should be recognised as income or expense and included in profit or
loss for the period, except to the extent that the tax arises from: [IAS 12.58]
If the tax relates to items that are credited or charged directly to equity, the tax should also be
charged or credited directly to equity. [IAS 12.61]
If the tax arises from a business combination that is an acquisition, it should be recognised as an
identifiable asset or liability at the date of acquisition in accordance with IFRS 3 Business
Combinations (thus affecting goodwill).
In some jurisdictions, income taxes are payable at a higher or lower rate if part or all of the net
profit or retained earnings is paid out as a dividend. In other jurisdictions, income taxes may be
refundable if part or all of the net profit or retained earnings is paid out as a dividend. Possible
future dividend distributions or tax refunds should not be anticipated in measuring deferred tax
assets and liabilities. [IAS 12.52A]
IAS 10 Events after the Reporting Period, requires disclosure, and prohibits accrual, of a
dividend that is proposed or declared after the end of the reporting period but before the financial
statements were authorised for issue. IAS 12 requires disclosure of the tax consequences of such
dividends as well as disclosure of the nature and amounts of the potential income tax
consequences of dividends. [IAS 12.82A]
Presentation
Current tax assets and current tax liabilities should be offset on the balance sheet only if the
entity has the legal right and the intention to settle on a net basis. [IAS 12.71]
Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities should be offset on the balance sheet only if the
entity has the legal right to settle on a net basis and they are levied by the same taxing authority
on the same entity or different entities that intend to realise the asset and settle the liability at the
same time. [IAS 12.74]
Disclosure
In addition to the disclosures required by IAS 12, some disclosures relating to income taxes are
required by IAS 1, as follows:
major components of tax expense (tax income) [IAS 12.79] Examples include:
o current tax expense (income)
o any adjustments of taxes of prior periods
o amount of deferred tax expense (income) relating to the origination and reversal
of temporary differences
o amount of deferred tax expense (income) relating to changes in tax rates or the
imposition of new taxes
o amount of the benefit arising from a previously unrecognised tax loss, tax credit
or temporary difference of a prior period
o write down, or reversal of a previous write down, of a deferred tax asset
o amount of tax expense (income) relating to changes in accounting policies and
corrections of errors
aggregate current and deferred tax relating to items reported directly in equity
tax relating to each component of other comprehensive income
explanation of the relationship between tax expense (income) and the tax that would be
expected by applying the current tax rate to accounting profit or loss (this can be
presented as a reconciliation of amounts of tax or a reconciliation of the rate of tax)
changes in tax rates
amounts and other details of deductible temporary differences, unused tax losses, and
unused tax credits
temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates, branches,
and joint ventures
for each type of temporary difference and unused tax loss and credit, the amount of
deferred tax assets or liabilities recognised in the statement of financial position and the
amount of deferred tax income or expense recognised in the income statement
tax relating to discontinued operations
tax consequences of dividends declared after the end of the reporting period
Summary of IAS 16
Objective of IAS 16
The objective of IAS 16 is to prescribe the accounting treatment for property, plant, and
equipment. The principal issues are the recognition of assets, the determination of their carrying
amounts, and the depreciation charges and impairment losses to be recognised in relation to
them.
Scope
The standard does apply to property, plant, and equipment used to develop or maintain the last
two categories of assets. [IAS 16.3]
Recognition
Items of property, plant, and equipment should be recognised as assets when it is probable that:
[IAS 16.7]
it is probable that the future economic benefits associated with the asset will flow to the
entity, and
the cost of the asset can be measured reliably.
This recognition principle is applied to all property, plant, and equipment costs at the time they
are incurred. These costs include costs incurred initially to acquire or construct an item of
property, plant and equipment and costs incurred subsequently to add to, replace part of, or
service it.
IAS 16 recognises that parts of some items of property, plant, and equipment may require
replacement at regular intervals. The carrying amount of an item of property, plant, and
equipment will include the cost of replacing the part of such an item when that cost is incurred if
the recognition criteria (future benefits and measurement reliability) are met. The carrying
amount of those parts that are replaced is derecognised in accordance with the derecognition
provisions of IAS 16.67-72. [IAS 16.13]
Also, continued operation of an item of property, plant, and equipment (for example, an aircraft)
may require regular major inspections for faults regardless of whether parts of the item are
replaced. When each major inspection is performed, its cost is recognised in the carrying amount
of the item of property, plant, and equipment as a replacement if the recognition criteria are
satisfied. If necessary, the estimated cost of a future similar inspection may be used as an
indication of what the cost of the existing inspection component was when the item was acquired
or constructed. [IAS 16.14]
Initial measurement
An item of property, plant and equipment should initially be recorded at cost. [IAS 16.15] Cost
includes all costs necessary to bring the asset to working condition for its intended use. This
would include not only its original purchase price but also costs of site preparation, delivery and
handling, installation, related professional fees for architects and engineers, and the estimated
cost of dismantling and removing the asset and restoring the site
If payment for an item of property, plant, and equipment is deferred, interest at a market rate
must be recognised or imputed. [IAS 16.23]
If an asset is acquired in exchange for another asset (whether similar or dissimilar in nature), the
cost will be measured at the fair value unless (a) the exchange transaction lacks commercial
substance or (b) the fair value of neither the asset received nor the asset given up is reliably
measurable. If the acquired item is not measured at fair value, its cost is measured at the carrying
amount of the asset given up. [IAS 16.24]
Cost model. The asset is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment.
[IAS 16.30]
Revaluation model. The asset is carried at a revalued amount, being its fair value at the
date of revaluation less subsequent depreciation and impairment, provided that fair value
can be measured reliably. [IAS 16.31]
Under the revaluation model, revaluations should be carried out regularly, so that the carrying
amount of an asset does not differ materially from its fair value at the balance sheet date. [IAS
16.31]
If an item is revalued, the entire class of assets to which that asset belongs should be revalued.
[IAS 16.36]
Revalued assets are depreciated in the same way as under the cost model (see below).
When a revalued asset is disposed of, any revaluation surplus may be transferred directly to
retained earnings, or it may be left in equity under the heading revaluation surplus. The transfer
to retained earnings should not be made through profit or loss. [IAS 16.41]
The depreciable amount (cost less residual value) should be allocated on a systematic basis over
the asset's useful life [IAS 16.50].
The residual value and the useful life of an asset should be reviewed at least at each financial
year-end and, if expectations differ from previous estimates, any change is accounted for
prospectively as a change in estimate under IAS 8. [IAS 16.51]
The depreciation method used should reflect the pattern in which the asset's economic benefits
are consumed by the entity [IAS 16.60];
The depreciation method should be reviewed at least annually and, if the pattern of consumption
of benefits has changed, the depreciation method should be changed prospectively as a change in
estimate under IAS 8. [IAS 16.61]
Depreciation should be charged to profit or loss, unless it is included in the carrying amount of
another asset [IAS 16.48].
IAS 36 requires impairment testing and, if necessary, recognition for property, plant, and
equipment. An item of property, plant, or equipment shall not be carried at more than
recoverable amount. Recoverable amount is the higher of an asset's fair value less costs to sell
and its value in use.
Any claim for compensation from third parties for impairment is included in profit or loss when
the claim becomes receivable. [IAS 16.65]
An asset should be removed from the statement of financial position on disposal or when it is
withdrawn from use and no future economic benefits are expected from its disposal. The gain or
loss on disposal is the difference between the proceeds and the carrying amount and should be
recognised in profit and loss. [IAS 16.67-71]
If an entity rents some assets and then ceases to rent them, the assets should be transferred to
inventories at their carrying amounts as they become held for sale in the ordinary course of
business. [IAS 16.68A]
Disclosure
For each class of property, plant, and equipment, disclose: [IAS 16.73]
restrictions on title
If property, plant, and equipment is stated at revalued amounts, certain additional disclosures are
required: [IAS 16.77]
IAS 17 — Leases
Summary of IAS 17
Objective of IAS 17
The objective of IAS 17 (1997) is to prescribe, for lessees and lessors, the appropriate accounting
policies and disclosures to apply in relation to finance and operating leases.
Scope
IAS 17 applies to all leases other than lease agreements for minerals, oil, natural gas, and similar
regenerative resources and licensing agreements for films, videos, plays, manuscripts, patents,
copyrights, and similar items. [IAS 17.2]
However, IAS 17 does not apply as the basis of measurement for the following leased assets:
[IAS 17.2]
property held by lessees that is accounted for as investment property for which the lessee
uses the fair value model set out in IAS 40
investment property provided by lessors under operating leases (see IAS 40)
biological assets held by lessees under finance leases (see IAS 41)
biological assets provided by lessors under operating leases (see IAS 41)
Classification of leases
Whether a lease is a finance lease or an operating lease depends on the substance of the
transaction rather than the form. Situations that would normally lead to a lease being classified as
a finance lease include the following: [IAS 17.10]
the lease transfers ownership of the asset to the lessee by the end of the lease term
the lessee has the option to purchase the asset at a price which is expected to be
sufficiently lower than fair value at the date the option becomes exercisable that, at the
inception of the lease, it is reasonably certain that the option will be exercised
the lease term is for the major part of the economic life of the asset, even if title is not
transferred
at the inception of the lease, the present value of the minimum lease payments amounts to
at least substantially all of the fair value of the leased asset
the lease assets are of a specialised nature such that only the lessee can use them without
major modifications being made
Other situations that might also lead to classification as a finance lease are: [IAS 17.11]
if the lessee is entitled to cancel the lease, the lessor's losses associated with the
cancellation are borne by the lessee
gains or losses from fluctuations in the fair value of the residual fall to the lessee (for
example, by means of a rebate of lease payments)
the lessee has the ability to continue to lease for a secondary period at a rent that is
substantially lower than market rent
When a lease includes both land and buildings elements, an entity assesses the classification of
each element as a finance or an operating lease separately. In determining whether the land
element is an operating or a finance lease, an important consideration is that land normally has
an indefinite economic life [IAS 17.15A]. Whenever necessary in order to classify and account
for a lease of land and buildings, the minimum lease payments (including any lump-sum upfront
payments) are allocated between the land and the buildings elements in proportion to the relative
fair values of the leasehold interests in the land element and buildings element of the lease at the
inception of the lease. [IAS 17.16] For a lease of land and buildings in which the amount that
would initially be recognised for the land element is immaterial, the land and buildings may be
treated as a single unit for the purpose of lease classification and classified as a finance or
operating lease. [IAS 17.17] However, separate measurement of the land and buildings elements
is not required if the lessee's interest in both land and buildings is classified as an investment
property in accordance with IAS 40 and the fair value model is adopted. [IAS 17.18]
Accounting by lessees
Incentives for the agreement of a new or renewed operating lease should be recognised by the
lessee as a reduction of the rental expense over the lease term, irrespective of the incentive's
nature or form, or the timing of payments.
Accounting by lessors
at commencement of the lease term, the lessor should record a finance lease in the
balance sheet as a receivable, at an amount equal to the net investment in the lease [IAS
17.36]
the lessor should recognise finance income based on a pattern reflecting a constant
periodic rate of return on the lessor's net investment outstanding in respect of the finance
lease [IAS 17.39]
assets held for operating leases should be presented in the balance sheet of the lessor
according to the nature of the asset. [IAS 17.49] Lease income should be recognised over
the lease term on a straight-line basis, unless another systematic basis is more
representative of the time pattern in which use benefit is derived from the leased asset is
diminished [IAS 17.50]
Incentives for the agreement of a new or renewed operating lease should be recognised by the
lessor as a reduction of the rental income over the lease term, irrespective of the incentive's
nature or form, or the timing of payments.
Manufacturers or dealer lessors should include selling profit or loss in the same period as they
would for an outright sale. If artificially low rates of interest are charged, selling profit should be
restricted to that which would apply if a commercial rate of interest were charged. [IAS 17.42]
Under the 2003 revisions to IAS 17, initial direct and incremental costs incurred by lessors in
negotiating leases must be recognised over the lease term. They may no longer be charged to
For a sale and leaseback transaction that results in a finance lease, any excess of proceeds over
the carrying amount is deferred and amortised over the lease term. [IAS 17.59]
if the transaction is clearly carried out at fair value - the profit or loss should be
recognised immediately
if the sale price is below fair value - profit or loss should be recognised immediately,
except if a loss is compensated for by future rentals at below market price, the loss it
should be amortised over the period of use
if the sale price is above fair value - the excess over fair value should be deferred and
amortised over the period of use
if the fair value at the time of the transaction is less than the carrying amount – a loss
equal to the difference should be recognised immediately [IAS 17.63]
amounts of minimum lease payments at balance sheet date under non cancellable
operating leases for:
o the next year
o years 2 through 5 combined
o beyond five years
total future minimum sublease income under noncancellable subleases
lease and sublease payments recognised in income for the period
contingent rent recognised as an expense
reconciliation between gross investment in the lease and the present value of minimum
lease payments;
gross investment and present value of minimum lease payments receivable for:
o the next year
o years 2 through 5 combined
o beyond five years
unearned finance income
unguaranteed residual values
accumulated allowance for uncollectible lease payments receivable
contingent rent recognised in income
general description of significant leasing arrangements
IAS 18 — Revenue
Summary of IAS 18
Objective of IAS 18
The objective of IAS 18 is to prescribe the accounting treatment for revenue arising from certain
types of transactions and events.
Key definition
Revenue: the gross inflow of economic benefits (cash, receivables, other assets) arising from the
ordinary operating activities of an entity (such as sales of goods, sales of services, interest,
royalties, and dividends). [IAS 18.7]
Revenue should be measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. [IAS
18.9] An exchange for goods or services of a similar nature and value is not regarded as a
transaction that generates revenue. However, exchanges for dissimilar items are regarded as
generating revenue. [IAS 18.12]
If the inflow of cash or cash equivalents is deferred, the fair value of the consideration receivable
is less than the nominal amount of cash and cash equivalents to be received, and discounting is
appropriate. This would occur, for instance, if the seller is providing interest-free credit to the
buyer or is charging a below-market rate of interest. Interest must be imputed based on market
rates. [IAS 18.11]
Recognition of revenue
Recognition, as defined in the IASB Framework, means incorporating an item that meets the
definition of revenue (above) in the income statement when it meets the following criteria:
it is probable that any future economic benefit associated with the item of revenue will
flow to the entity, and
the amount of revenue can be measured with reliability
IAS 18 provides guidance for recognising the following specific categories of revenue:
Sale of goods
Revenue arising from the sale of goods should be recognised when all of the following criteria
have been satisfied: [IAS 18.14]
the seller has transferred to the buyer the significant risks and rewards of ownership
the seller retains neither continuing managerial involvement to the degree usually
associated with ownership nor effective control over the goods sold
the amount of revenue can be measured reliably
it is probable that the economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow to the
seller, and
the costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the transaction can be measured reliably
Rendering of services
For revenue arising from the rendering of services, provided that all of the following criteria are
met, revenue should be recognised by reference to the stage of completion of the transaction at
the balance sheet date (the percentage-of-completion method): [IAS 18.20]
When the above criteria are not met, revenue arising from the rendering of services should be
recognised only to the extent of the expenses recognised that are recoverable (a "cost-recovery
approach". [IAS 18.26]
For interest, royalties and dividends, provided that it is probable that the economic benefits will
flow to the enterprise and the amount of revenue can be measured reliably, revenue should be
recognised as follows: [IAS 18.29-30]
Implementation guidance
Appendix A to IAS 18 provides illustrative examples of how the above principles apply to
certain transactions.
IAS 19 Employee Benefits (2011) is an amended version of, and supersedes, IAS 19 Employee
Benefits (1998), effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013. The summary
that follows refers to IAS 19 (2011).
The objective of IAS 19 is to prescribe the accounting and disclosure for employee benefits,
requiring an entity to recognise a liability where an employee has provided service and an
expense when the entity consumes the economic benefits of employee service. [IAS 19(2011).2]
Scope
IAS 19 (2011) does not apply to employee benefits within the scope of IFRS 2 Share-based
Payment or the reporting by employee benefit plans (see IAS 26 Accounting and Reporting by
Retirement Benefit Plans).
Short-term employee benefits are those expected to be settled wholly before twelve months after
the end of the annual reporting period during which employee services are rendered, but do not
The undiscounted amount of the benefits expected to be paid in respect of service rendered by
employees in an accounting period is recognised in that period. [IAS 19(2011).11] The expected
cost of short-term compensated absences is recognised as the employees render service that
increases their entitlement or, in the case of non-accumulating absences, when the absences
occur, and includes any additional amounts an entity expects to pay as a result of unused
entitlements at the end of the period. [IAS 19(2011).13-16]
An entity recognises the expected cost of profit-sharing and bonus payments when, and only
when, it has a legal or constructive obligation to make such payments as a result of past events
and a reliable estimate of the expected obligation can be made. [IAS 19.19]
Post-employment benefit plans are informal or formal arrangements where an entity provides
post-employment benefits to one or more employees, e.g. retirement benefits (pensions or lump
sum payments), life insurance and medical care.
The accounting treatment for a post-employment benefit plan depends on the economic
substance of the plan and results in the plan being classified as either a defined contribution plan
or a defined benefit plan:
Defined contribution plans. Under a defined contribution plan, the entity pays fixed
contributions into a fund but has no legal or constructive obligation to make further
payments if the fund does not have sufficient assets to pay all of the employees'
entitlements to post-employment benefits. The entity's obligation is therefore effectively
limited to the amount it agrees to contribute to the fund and effectively place actuarial
and investment risk on the employee
Defined benefit plans These are post-employment benefit plans other than a defined
contribution plans. These plans create an obligation on the entity to provide agreed
benefits to current and past employees and effectively places actuarial and investment
risk on the entity.
For defined contribution plans, the amount recognised in the period is the contribution payable in
exchange for service rendered by employees during the period. [IAS 19(2011).51]
Contributions to a defined contribution plan which are not expected to be wholly settled within
12 months after the end of the annual reporting period in which the employee renders the related
service are discounted to their present value. [IAS 19.52]
Basic requirements
An entity is required to recognise the net defined benefit liability or asset in its statement of
financial performance. [IAS 19(2011).63] However, the measurement of a net defined benefit
asset is the lower of any surplus in the fund and the 'asset ceiling' (i.e. the present value of any
economic benefits available in the form of refunds from the plan or reductions in future
contributions to the plan). [IAS 19(2011).64]
Measurement
The measurement of a net defined benefit liability or assets requires the application of an
actuarial valuation method, the attribution of benefits to periods of service, and the use of
actuarial assumptions. [IAS 19(2011).66] The fair value of any plan assets is deducted from the
present value of the defined benefit obligation in determining the net deficit or surplus.
[IAS 19(2011).113]
The determination of the net defined benefit liability (or asset) is carried out with sufficient
regularity such that the amounts recognised in the financial statements do not differ materially
from those that would be determined at end of the reporting period. [IAS 19(2011).58]
The present value of an entity's defined benefit obligations and related service costs is
determined using the 'projected unit credit method', which sees each period of service as giving
rise to an additional unit of benefit entitlement and measures each unit separately in building up
the final obligation. [IAS 19(2011).67-68] This requires an entity to attribute benefit to the
current period (to determine current service cost) and the current and prior periods (to determine
the present value of defined benefit obligations). Benefit is attributed to periods of service using
the plan's benefit formula, unless an employee's service in later years will lead to a materially
higher of benefit than in earlier years, in which case a straight-line basis is used
[IAS 19(2011).70]
The overall actuarial assumptions used must be unbiased and mutually compatible, and represent
the best estimate of the variables determining the ultimate post-employment benefit cost.
[IAS 19(2011).75-76]:
Financial assumptions must be based on market expectations at the end of the reporting
period [IAS 19(2011).80]
Mortality assumptions are determined by reference to the best estimate of the mortality of
plan members during and after employment [IAS 19(2011).81]
The discount rate used is determined by reference to market yields at the end of the
reporting period on high quality corporate bonds, or where there is no deep market in
such bonds, by reference to market yields on government bonds. Currencies and terms of
Past service cost is the term used to describe the change in a defined benefit obligation for
employee service in prior periods, arising as a result of changes to plan arrangements in the
current period (i.e. plan amendments introducing or changing benefits payable, or curtailments
which significantly reduce the number of covered employees) .
Past service cost may be either positive (where benefits are introduced or improved) or negative
(where existing benefits are reduced). Past service cost is recognised as an expense at the earlier
of the date when a plan amendment or curtailment occurs and the date when an entity recognises
any termination benefits, or related restructuring costs under IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent
Liabilities and Contingent Assets. [IAS 19(2011).103]
Gains or losses on the settlement of a defined benefit plan are recognised when the settlement
occurs. [IAS 19(2011).110]
Before past service costs are determined, or a gain or loss on settlement is recognised, the net
defined benefit liability or asset is required to be remeasured, however an entity is not required to
distinguish between past service costs resulting from curtailments and gains and losses on
settlement where these transactions occur together. [IAS 19(2011).99-100]
Other guidance
IAS 19(2011) sets the following disclosure objectives in relation to defined benefit plans
[IAS 19(2011).135]:
Extensive specific disclosures in relation to meeting each the above objectives are specified, e.g.
a reconciliation from the opening balance to the closing balance of the net defined benefit
liability or asset, disaggregation of the fair value of plan assets into classes, and sensitivity
analysis of each significant actuarial assumption. [IAS 19(2011).136-147]
Additional disclosures are required in relation to multi-employer plans and defined benefit plans
sharing risk between entities under common control. [IAS 19(2011).148-150].
IAS 19 (2011) prescribes a modified application of the post-employment benefit model described
above for other long-term employee benefits: [IAS 19(2011).153-154]
Termination benefits
A termination benefit liability is recognised at the earlier of the following dates: [IAS 19.165-
168]
when the entity can no longer withdraw the offer of those benefits - additional guidance
is provided on when this date occurs in relation to an employee's decision to accept an
offer of benefits on termination, and as a result of an entity's decision to terminate an
employee's employment
when the entity recognises costs for a restructuring under IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent
Liabilities and Contingent Assets which involves the payment of termination benefits.
Termination benefits are measured in accordance with the nature of employee benefit, i.e. as an
enhancement of other post-employment benefits, or otherwise as a short-term employee benefit
or other long-term employee benefit. [IAS 19(2011).169]
Summary of IAS 24
Objective of IAS 24
The objective of IAS 24 is to ensure that an entity's financial statements contain the disclosures
necessary to draw attention to the possibility that its financial position and profit or loss may
have been affected by the existence of related parties and by transactions and outstanding
balances with such parties.
A related party is a person or entity that is related to the entity that is preparing its financial
statements (referred to as the 'reporting entity') [IAS 24.9].
(a) A person or a close member of that person's family is related to a reporting entity if
that person:
o (i) has control or joint control over the reporting entity;
* Requirement added by Annual Improvements to IFRSs 2010–2012 Cycle, effective for annual
periods beginning on or after 1 July 2014.
two entities simply because they have a director or key manager in common
two venturers who share joint control over a joint venture
providers of finance, trade unions, public utilities, and departments and agencies of a
government that does not control, jointly control or significantly influence the reporting
entity, simply by virtue of their normal dealings with an entity (even though they may
affect the freedom of action of an entity or participate in its decision-making process)
a single customer, supplier, franchiser, distributor, or general agent with whom an entity
transacts a significant volume of business merely by virtue of the resulting economic
dependence
Disclosure
Management compensation. Disclose key management personnel compensation in total and for
each of the following categories: [IAS 24.17]
Key management personnel are those persons having authority and responsibility for planning,
directing, and controlling the activities of the entity, directly or indirectly, including any directors
(whether executive or otherwise) of the entity. [IAS 24.9]
If an entity obtains key management personnel services from a management entity, the entity is
not required to disclose the compensation paid or payable by the management entity to the
management entity‘s employees or directors. Instead the entity discloses the amounts incurred by
the entity for the provision of key management personnel services that are provided by the
separate management entity*. [IAS 24.17A, 18A]
Related party transactions. If there have been transactions between related parties, disclose the
nature of the related party relationship as well as information about the transactions and
outstanding balances necessary for an understanding of the potential effect of the relationship on
the financial statements. These disclosure would be made separately for each category of related
parties and would include: [IAS 24.18-19]
A statement that related party transactions were made on terms equivalent to those that prevail in
arm's length transactions should be made only if such terms can be substantiated. [IAS 24.2
Summary of IAS 32
Objective of IAS 32
The stated objective of IAS 32 is to establish principles for presenting financial instruments as
liabilities or equity and for offsetting financial assets and liabilities. [IAS 32.1]
Scope
interests in subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures that are accounted for under IAS 27
Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements, IAS 28 Investments in Associates or
IAS 31 Interests in Joint Ventures (or, for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January
2013, IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements, IAS 27 Separate Financial
Statements and IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures). However, IAS 32
applies to all derivatives on interests in subsidiaries, associates, or joint ventures.
employers' rights and obligations under employee benefit plans (see IAS 19 Employee
Benefits)
insurance contracts(see IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts). However, IAS 32 applies to
derivatives that are embedded in insurance contracts if they are required to be accounted
separately by IAS 39
financial instruments that are within the scope of IFRS 4 because they contain a
discretionary participation feature are only exempt from applying paragraphs 15-32 and
AG25-35 (analysing debt and equity components) but are subject to all other IAS 32
requirements
contracts and obligations under share-based payment transactions (see IFRS 2 Share-
based Payment) with the following exceptions:
o this standard applies to contracts within the scope of IAS 32.8-10 (see below)
o paragraphs 33-34 apply when accounting for treasury shares purchased, sold,
issued or cancelled by employee share option plans or similar arrangements
IAS 32 applies to those contracts to buy or sell a non-financial item that can be settled net in cash
or another financial instrument, except for contracts that were entered into and continue to be
held for the purpose of the receipt or delivery of a non-financial item in accordance with the
entity's expected purchase, sale or usage requirements. [IAS 32.8]
Financial instrument: a contract that gives rise to a financial asset of one entity and a financial
liability or equity instrument of another entity.
cash
an equity instrument of another entity
a contractual right
o to receive cash or another financial asset from another entity; or
o to exchange financial assets or financial liabilities with another entity under
conditions that are potentially favourable to the entity; or
a contract that will or may be settled in the entity's own equity instruments and is:
o a non-derivative for which the entity is or may be obliged to receive a variable
number of the entity's own equity instruments
a contractual obligation:
o to deliver cash or another financial asset to another entity; or
o to exchange financial assets or financial liabilities with another entity under
conditions that are potentially unfavourable to the entity; or
a contract that will or may be settled in the entity's own equity instruments and is
o a non-derivative for which the entity is or may be obliged to deliver a variable
number of the entity's own equity instruments or
o a derivative that will or may be settled other than by the exchange of a fixed
amount of cash or another financial asset for a fixed number of the entity's own
equity instruments. For this purpose the entity's own equity instruments do not
include: instruments that are themselves contracts for the future receipt or
delivery of the entity's own equity instruments; puttable instruments classified as
equity or certain liabilities arising on liquidation classified by IAS 32 as equity
instruments
Equity instrument: Any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of an entity after
deducting all of its liabilities.
Fair value: the amount for which an asset could be exchanged, or a liability settled, between
knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm's length transaction.
The definition of financial instrument used in IAS 32 is the same as that in IAS 39.
Puttable instrument: a financial instrument that gives the holder the right to put the instrument
back to the issuer for cash or another financial asset or is automatically put back to the issuer on
occurrence of an uncertain future event or the death or retirement of the instrument holder.
The fundamental principle of IAS 32 is that a financial instrument should be classified as either a
financial liability or an equity instrument according to the substance of the contract, not its legal
form, and the definitions of financial liability and equity instrument. Two exceptions from this
principle are certain puttable instruments meeting specific criteria and certain obligations arising
on liquidation (see below). The entity must make the decision at the time the instrument is
initially recognised. The classification is not subsequently changed based on changed
circumstances. [IAS 32.15]
a non-derivative that includes no contractual obligation for the issuer to deliver a variable
number of its own equity instruments; or
a derivative that will be settled only by the issuer exchanging a fixed amount of cash or
another financial asset for a fixed number of its own equity instruments. [IAS 32.16]
If an entity issues preference (preferred) shares that pay a fixed rate of dividend and that have a
mandatory redemption feature at a future date, the substance is that they are a contractual
obligation to deliver cash and, therefore, should be recognised as a liability. [IAS 32.18(a)] In
contrast, preference shares that do not have a fixed maturity, and where the issuer does not have
a contractual obligation to make any payment are equity. In this example even though both
instruments are legally termed preference shares they have different contractual terms and one is
a financial liability while the other is equity.
A contractual right or obligation to receive or deliver a number of its own shares or other equity
instruments that varies so that the fair value of the entity's own equity instruments to be received
or delivered equals the fixed monetary amount of the contractual right or obligation is a financial
liability. [IAS 32.20]
When a derivative financial instrument gives one party a choice over how it is settled (for
instance, the issuer or the holder can choose settlement net in cash or by exchanging shares for
cash), it is a financial asset or a financial liability unless all of the settlement alternatives would
result in it being an equity instrument. [IAS 32.26]
If, as a result of contingent settlement provisions, the issuer does not have an unconditional right
to avoid settlement by delivery of cash or other financial instrument (or otherwise to settle in a
way that it would be a financial liability) the instrument is a financial liability of the issuer,
unless:
In February 2008, the IASB amended IAS 32 and IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements
with respect to the balance sheet classification of puttable financial instruments and obligations
arising only on liquidation. As a result of the amendments, some financial instruments that
currently meet the definition of a financial liability will be classified as equity because they
represent the residual interest in the net assets of the entity. [IAS 32.16A-D]
In October 2009, the IASB issued an amendment to IAS 32 on the classification of rights issues.
For rights issues offered for a fixed amount of foreign currency current practice appears to
require such issues to be accounted for as derivative liabilities. The amendment states that if such
rights are issued pro rata to an entity's all existing shareholders in the same class for a fixed
amount of currency, they should be classified as equity regardless of the currency in which the
exercise price is denominated.
Some financial instruments – sometimes called compound instruments – have both a liability and
an equity component from the issuer's perspective. In that case, IAS 32 requires that the
component parts be accounted for and presented separately according to their substance based on
the definitions of liability and equity. The split is made at issuance and not revised for
subsequent changes in market interest rates, share prices, or other event that changes the
likelihood that the conversion option will be exercised. [IAS 32.29-30]
To illustrate, a convertible bond contains two components. One is a financial liability, namely
the issuer's contractual obligation to pay cash, and the other is an equity instrument, namely the
holder's option to convert into common shares. Another example is debt issued with detachable
share purchase warrants.
When the initial carrying amount of a compound financial instrument is required to be allocated
to its equity and liability components, the equity component is assigned the residual amount after
deducting from the fair value of the instrument as a whole the amount separately determined for
the liability component. [IAS 32.32]
Interest, dividends, gains, and losses relating to an instrument classified as a liability should be
reported in profit or loss. This means that dividend payments on preferred shares classified as
liabilities are treated as expenses. On the other hand, distributions (such as dividends) to holders
of a financial instrument classified as equity should be charged directly against equity, not
against earnings. [IAS 32.35]
Transaction costs of an equity transaction are deducted from equity. Transaction costs related to
an issue of a compound financial instrument are allocated to the liability and equity components
in proportion to the allocation of proceeds.
The cost of an entity's own equity instruments that it has reacquired ('treasury shares') is
deducted from equity. Gain or loss is not recognised on the purchase, sale, issue, or cancellation
of treasury shares. Treasury shares may be acquired and held by the entity or by other members
of the consolidated group. Consideration paid or received is recognised directly in equity. [IAS
32.33]
Offsetting
IAS 32 also prescribes rules for the offsetting of financial assets and financial liabilities. It
specifies that a financial asset and a financial liability should be offset and the net amount
reported when, and only when, an entity: [IAS 32.42]
Costs of issuing or reacquiring equity instruments (other than in a business combination) are
accounted for as a deduction from equity, net of any related income tax benefit. [IAS 32.35]
Disclosures
The disclosures relating to treasury shares are in IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements and
IAS 24 Related Parties for share repurchases from related parties. [IAS 32.34 and 39]
Summary of IAS 33
Objective of IAS 33
The objective of IAS 33 is to prescribe principles for determining and presenting earnings per
share (EPS) amounts to improve performance comparisons between different entities in the same
reporting period and between different reporting periods for the same entity. [IAS 33.1]
Scope
If both parent and consolidated statements are presented in a single report, EPS is required only
for the consolidated statements. [IAS 33.4]
Ordinary share: also known as a common share or common stock. An equity instrument that is
subordinate to all other classes of equity instruments.
Potential ordinary share: a financial instrument or other contract that may entitle its holder to
ordinary shares.
Common examples of potential ordinary shares
convertible debt
convertible preferred shares
share warrants
share options
share rights
employee stock purchase plans
contractual rights to purchase shares
contingent issuance contracts or agreements (such as those arising in business
combination)
Dilution: a reduction in earnings per share or an increase in loss per share resulting from the
assumption that convertible instruments are converted, that options or warrants are exercised, or
that ordinary shares are issued upon the satisfaction of specified conditions.
Antidilution: an increase in earnings per share or a reduction in loss per share resulting from the
assumption that convertible instruments are converted, that options or warrants are exercised, or
that ordinary shares are issued upon the satisfaction of specified conditions.
An entity whose securities are publicly traded (or that is in process of public issuance) must
present, on the face of the statement of comprehensive income, basic and diluted EPS for: [IAS
33.66]
profit or loss from continuing operations attributable to the ordinary equity holders of the
parent entity; and
profit or loss attributable to the ordinary equity holders of the parent entity for the period
for each class of ordinary shares that has a different right to share in profit for the period.
If an entity presents the components of profit or loss in a separate income statement, it presents
EPS only in that separate statement. [IAS 33.4A]
August 2015 www.fb.com/kasnebcsia
282
Basic and diluted EPS must be presented with equal prominence for all periods presented. [IAS
33.66]
Basic and diluted EPS must be presented even if the amounts are negative (that is, a loss per
share). [IAS 33.69]
If an entity reports a discontinued operation, basic and diluted amounts per share must be
disclosed for the discontinued operation either on the face of the of comprehensive income (or
separate income statement if presented) or in the notes to the financial statements. [IAS 33.68
and 68A]
Basic EPS
Basic EPS is calculated by dividing profit or loss attributable to ordinary equity holders of the
parent entity (the numerator) by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding
(the denominator) during the period. [IAS 33.10]
The earnings numerators (profit or loss from continuing operations and net profit or loss) used
for the calculation should be after deducting all expenses including taxes, minority interests, and
preference dividends. [IAS 33.12]
The denominator (number of shares) is calculated by adjusting the shares in issue at the
beginning of the period by the number of shares bought back or issued during the period,
multiplied by a time-weighting factor. IAS 33 includes guidance on appropriate recognition dates
for shares issued in various circumstances. [IAS 33.20-21]
Contingently issuable shares are included in the basic EPS denominator when the contingency
has been met. [IAS 33.24]
Diluted EPS
Diluted EPS is calculated by adjusting the earnings and number of shares for the effects of
dilutive options and other dilutive potential ordinary shares. [IAS 33.31] The effects of anti-
dilutive potential ordinary shares are ignored in calculating diluted EPS. [IAS 33.41]
Guidance on calculating dilution
Convertible securities. The numerator should be adjusted for the after-tax effects of dividends
and interest charged in relation to dilutive potential ordinary shares and for any other changes in
income that would result from the conversion of the potential ordinary shares. [IAS 33.33] The
denominator should include shares that would be issued on the conversion. [IAS 33.36]
Options and warrants. In calculating diluted EPS, assume the exercise of outstanding dilutive
options and warrants. The assumed proceeds from exercise should be regarded as having been
used to repurchase ordinary shares at the average market price during the period. The difference
between the number of ordinary shares assumed issued on exercise and the number of ordinary
shares assumed repurchased shall be treated as an issue of ordinary shares for no consideration.
[IAS 33.45]
Contracts that may be settled in ordinary shares or cash. Presume that the contract will be
settled in ordinary shares, and include the resulting potential ordinary shares in diluted EPS if the
effect is dilutive. [IAS 33.58]
Retrospective adjustments
The calculation of basic and diluted EPS for all periods presented is adjusted retrospectively
when the number of ordinary or potential ordinary shares outstanding increases as a result of a
capitalisation, bonus issue, or share split, or decreases as a result of a reverse share split. If such
changes occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are authorised for
issue, the EPS calculations for those and any prior period financial statements presented are
based on the new number of shares. Disclosure is required. [IAS 33.64]
Basic and diluted EPS are also adjusted for the effects of errors and adjustments resulting from
changes in accounting policies, accounted for retrospectively. [IAS 33.64]
Diluted EPS for prior periods should not be adjusted for changes in the assumptions used or for
the conversion of potential ordinary shares into ordinary shares outstanding. [IAS 33.65]
Disclosure
the amounts used as the numerators in calculating basic and diluted EPS, and a
reconciliation of those amounts to profit or loss attributable to the parent entity for the
period
the weighted average number of ordinary shares used as the denominator in calculating
basic and diluted EPS, and a reconciliation of these denominators to each other
instruments (including contingently issuable shares) that could potentially dilute basic
EPS in the future, but were not included in the calculation of diluted EPS because they
are antidilutive for the period(s) presented
a description of those ordinary share transactions or potential ordinary share transactions
that occur after the balance sheet date and that would have changed significantly the
number of ordinary shares or potential ordinary shares outstanding at the end of the
period if those transactions had occurred before the end of the reporting period. Examples
include issues and redemptions of ordinary shares issued for cash, warrants and options,
conversions, and exercises [IAS 34.71]
Summary of IAS 37
Objective
The objective of IAS 37 is to ensure that appropriate recognition criteria and measurement bases
are applied to provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets and that sufficient
information is disclosed in the notes to the financial statements to enable users to understand
their nature, timing and amount. The key principle established by the Standard is that a provision
should be recognised only when there is a liability i.e. a present obligation resulting from past
events. The Standard thus aims to ensure that only genuine obligations are dealt with in the
financial statements – planned future expenditure, even where authorised by the board of
directors or equivalent governing body, is excluded from recognition.
Scope
financial instruments that are in the scope of IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition
and Measurement (or IFRS 9 Financial Instruments)
non-onerous executory contracts
insurance contracts (see IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts), but IAS 37 does apply to other
provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets of an insurer
items covered by another IFRS. For example, IAS 11 Construction Contracts applies to
obligations arising under such contracts; IAS 12 Income Taxes applies to obligations for
current or deferred income taxes; IAS 17 Leases applies to lease obligations; and IAS 19
Employee Benefits applies to pension and other employee benefit obligations; and .
Liability:
Contingent liability:
Contingent asset:
Recognition of a provision
An entity must recognise a provision if, and only if: [IAS 37.14]
a present obligation (legal or constructive) has arisen as a result of a past event (the
obligating event),
payment is probable ('more likely than not'), and
the amount can be estimated reliably.
An obligating event is an event that creates a legal or constructive obligation and, therefore,
results in an entity having no realistic alternative but to settle the obligation. [IAS 37.10]
A constructive obligation arises if past practice creates a valid expectation on the part of a third
party, for example, a retail store that has a long-standing policy of allowing customers to return
merchandise within, say, a 30-day period. [IAS 37.10]
A possible obligation (a contingent liability) is disclosed but not accrued. However, disclosure is
not required if payment is remote. [IAS 37.86]
In rare cases, for example in a lawsuit, it may not be clear whether an entity has a present
obligation. In those cases, a past event is deemed to give rise to a present obligation if, taking
account of all available evidence, it is more likely than not that a present obligation exists at the
balance sheet date. A provision should be recognised for that present obligation if the other
recognition criteria described above are met. If it is more likely than not that no present
obligation exists, the entity should disclose a contingent liability, unless the possibility of an
outflow of resources is remote. [IAS 37.15]
Measurement of provisions
The amount recognised as a provision should be the best estimate of the expenditure required to
settle the present obligation at the balance sheet date, that is, the amount that an entity would
rationally pay to settle the obligation at the balance sheet date or to transfer it to a third party.
[IAS 37.36] This means:
In reaching its best estimate, the entity should take into account the risks and uncertainties that
surround the underlying events. [IAS 37.42]
Restructurings
Sale of operation: recognise a provision only after a binding sale agreement [IAS 37.78]
Closure or reorganisation: recognise a provision only after a detailed formal plan is
adopted and has started being implemented, or announced to those affected. A board
decision of itself is insufficient.
Future operating losses: provisions are not recognised for future operating losses, even
in a restructuring
Restructuring provision on acquisition: recognise a provision only if there is an
obligation at acquisition date [IFRS 3.11]
Restructuring provisions should include only direct expenditures necessarily entailed by the
restructuring, not costs that associated with the ongoing activities of the entity. [IAS 37.80]
When a provision (liability) is recognised, the debit entry for a provision is not always an
expense. Sometimes the provision may form part of the cost of the asset. Examples: included in
the cost of inventories, or an obligation for environmental cleanup when a new mine is opened or
an offshore oil rig is installed. [IAS 37.8]
Provisions should only be used for the purpose for which they were originally recognised. They
should be reviewed at each balance sheet date and adjusted to reflect the current best estimate. If
it is no longer probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation, the
provision should be reversed. [IAS 37.61]
Contingent liabilities
Since there is common ground as regards liabilities that are uncertain, IAS 37 also deals with
contingencies. It requires that entities should not recognise contingent liabilities – but should
disclose them, unless the possibility of an outflow of economic resources is remote. [IAS 37.86]
Contingent assets
Contingent assets should not be recognised – but should be disclosed where an inflow of
economic benefits is probable. When the realisation of income is virtually certain, then the
related asset is not a contingent asset and its recognition is appropriate. [IAS 37.31-35]
Disclosures
opening balance
additions
used (amounts charged against the provision)
unused amounts reversed
unwinding of the discount, or changes in discount rate
closing balance
nature
timing
uncertainties
assumptions
reimbursement, if any
IAS 39 was reissued in December 2003, applies to annual periods beginning on or after 1
January 2005, and will be superseded by IFRS 9 not earlier than 2017
Scope exclusions
IAS 39 applies to all types of financial instruments except for the following, which are scoped
out of IAS 39: [IAS 39.2]
interests in subsidiaries, associates, and joint ventures accounted for under IAS 27
Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements, IAS 28 Investments in Associates, or
IAS 31 Interests in Joint Ventures (or, for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013,
IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements, IAS 27 Separate Financial Statements or
IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures); however IAS 39 applies in cases
where under those standards such interests are to be accounted for under IAS 39. The
standard also applies to most derivatives on an interest in a subsidiary, associate, or joint
venture
employers' rights and obligations under employee benefit plans to which IAS 19
Employee Benefits applies
forward contracts between an acquirer and selling shareholder to buy or sell an acquiree
that will result in a business combination at a future acquisition date
rights and obligations under insurance contracts, except IAS 39 does apply to financial
instruments that take the form of an insurance (or reinsurance) contract but that
principally involve the transfer of financial risks and derivatives embedded in insurance
contracts
financial instruments that meet the definition of own equity under IAS 32 Financial
Instruments: Presentation
financial instruments, contracts and obligations under share-based payment transactions
to which IFRS 2 Share-based Payment applies
rights to reimbursement payments to which IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and
Contingent Assets applies
Leases
IAS 39 applies to lease receivables and payables only in limited respects: [IAS 39.2(b)]
IAS 39 applies to lease receivables with respect to the derecognition and impairment
provisions
IAS 39 applies to lease payables with respect to the derecognition provisions
IAS 39 applies to derivatives embedded in leases.
Financial guarantees
Accounting by the holder is excluded from the scope of IAS 39 and IFRS 4 (unless the contract
is a reinsurance contract). Therefore, paragraphs 10-12 of IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in
Accounting Estimates and Errors apply. Those paragraphs specify criteria to use in developing
an accounting policy if no IFRS applies specifically to an item.
Loan commitments
Loan commitments are outside the scope of IAS 39 if they cannot be settled net in cash or
another financial instrument, they are not designated as financial liabilities at fair value through
profit or loss, and the entity does not have a past practice of selling the loans that resulted from
the commitment shortly after origination. An issuer of a commitment to provide a loan at a
below-market interest rate is required initially to recognise the commitment at its fair value;
subsequently, the issuer will remeasure it at the higher of (a) the amount recognised under IAS
37 and (b) the amount initially recognised less, where appropriate, cumulative amortisation
recognised in accordance with IAS 18. An issuer of loan commitments must apply IAS 37 to
other loan commitments that are not within the scope of IAS 39 (that is, those made at market or
above). Loan commitments are subject to the derecognition provisions of IAS 39. [IAS 39.4]
Contracts to buy or sell financial items are always within the scope of IAS 39 (unless one of the
other exceptions applies).
Contracts to buy or sell non-financial items are within the scope of IAS 39 if they can be settled
net in cash or another financial asset and are not entered into and held for the purpose of the
receipt or delivery of a non-financial item in accordance with the entity's expected purchase, sale,
or usage requirements. Contracts to buy or sell non-financial items are inside the scope if net
settlement occurs. The following situations constitute net settlement: [IAS 39.5-6]
Weather derivatives
Although contracts requiring payment based on climatic, geological, or other physical variable
were generally excluded from the original version of IAS 39, they were added to the scope of the
revised IAS 39 in December 2003 if they are not in the scope of IFRS 4. [IAS 39.AG1]
IAS 39 incorporates the definitions of the following items from IAS 32 Financial Instruments:
Presentation: [IAS 39.8]
financial instrument
financial asset
financial liability
equity instrument.
Note: Where an entity applies IFRS 9 Financial Instruments prior to its mandatory application
date (1 January 2015), definitions of the following terms are also incorporated from IFRS 9:
derecognition, derivative, fair value, financial guarantee contract. The definition of those terms
outlined below (as relevant) are those from IAS 39.
Common examples of financial instruments within the scope of IAS 39
cash
demand and time deposits
commercial paper
accounts, notes, and loans receivable and payable
debt and equity securities. These are financial instruments from the perspectives of both
the holder and the issuer. This category includes investments in subsidiaries, associates,
and joint ventures
asset backed securities such as collateralised mortgage obligations, repurchase
agreements, and securitised packages of receivables
derivatives, including options, rights, warrants, futures contracts, forward contracts, and
swaps.
Interest rate swaps and forward rate agreements: Contracts to exchange cash flows as of a
specified date or a series of specified dates based on a notional amount and fixed and floating
rates.
Options: Contracts that give the purchaser the right, but not the obligation, to buy (call option)
or sell (put option) a specified quantity of a particular financial instrument, commodity, or
foreign currency, at a specified price (strike price), during or at a specified period of time. These
can be individually written or exchange-traded. The purchaser of the option pays the seller
(writer) of the option a fee (premium) to compensate the seller for the risk of payments under the
option.
Caps and floors: These are contracts sometimes referred to as interest rate options. An interest
rate cap will compensate the purchaser of the cap if interest rates rise above a predetermined rate
(strike rate) while an interest rate floor will compensate the purchaser if rates fall below a
predetermined rate.
Embedded derivatives
Some contracts that themselves are not financial instruments may nonetheless have financial
instruments embedded in them. For example, a contract to purchase a commodity at a fixed price
for delivery at a future date has embedded in it a derivative that is indexed to the price of the
commodity.
An embedded derivative is a feature within a contract, such that the cash flows associated with
that feature behave in a similar fashion to a stand-alone derivative. In the same way that
derivatives must be accounted for at fair value on the balance sheet with changes recognised in
the income statement, so must some embedded derivatives. IAS 39 requires that an embedded
derivative be separated from its host contract and accounted for as a derivative when:
[IAS 39.11]
the economic risks and characteristics of the embedded derivative are not closely related
to those of the host contract
a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative would meet the
definition of a derivative, and
the entire instrument is not measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognised
in the income statement
If an embedded derivative is separated, the host contract is accounted for under the appropriate
standard (for instance, under IAS 39 if the host is a financial instrument). Appendix A to IAS 39
provides examples of embedded derivatives that are closely related to their hosts, and of those
that are not.
Examples of embedded derivatives that are not closely related to their hosts (and therefore must
be separately accounted for) include:
If IAS 39 requires that an embedded derivative be separated from its host contract, but the entity
is unable to measure the embedded derivative separately, the entire combined contract must be
designated as a financial asset as at fair value through profit or loss). [IAS 39.12]
Since IAS 39 does not address accounting for equity instruments issued by the reporting
enterprise but it does deal with accounting for financial liabilities, classification of an instrument
as liability or as equity is critical. IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation addresses the
classification question.
IAS 39 requires financial assets to be classified in one of the following categories: [IAS 39.45]
Those categories are used to determine how a particular financial asset is recognised and
measured in the financial statements.
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss. This category has two subcategories:
Designated. The first includes any financial asset that is designated on initial recognition
as one to be measured at fair value with fair value changes in profit or loss.
Held for trading. The second category includes financial assets that are held for trading.
All derivatives (except those designated hedging instruments) and financial assets
acquired or held for the purpose of selling in the short term or for which there is a recent
pattern of short-term profit taking are held for trading. [IAS 39.9]
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments
that are not quoted in an active market, other than held for trading or designated on initial
recognition as assets at fair value through profit or loss or as available-for-sale. Loans and
receivables for which the holder may not recover substantially all of its initial investment, other
than because of credit deterioration, should be classified as available-for-sale.[IAS 39.9] Loans
and receivables are measured at amortised cost. [IAS 39.46(a)]
The category of financial liability at fair value through profit or loss has two subcategories:
Designated. a financial liability that is designated by the entity as a liability at fair value
through profit or loss upon initial recognition
Held for trading. a financial liability classified as held for trading, such as an obligation
for securities borrowed in a short sale, which have to be returned in the future
Initial recognition
Regular way purchases or sales of a financial asset. A regular way purchase or sale of
financial assets is recognised and derecognised using either trade date or settlement date
accounting. [IAS 39.38] The method used is to be applied consistently for all purchases and sales
of financial assets that belong to the same category of financial asset as defined in IAS 39 (note
that for this purpose assets held for trading form a different category from assets designated at
fair value through profit or loss). The choice of method is an accounting policy. [IAS 39.38]
IAS 39 requires that all financial assets and all financial liabilities be recognised on the balance
sheet. That includes all derivatives. Historically, in many parts of the world, derivatives have not
been recognised on company balance sheets. The argument has been that at the time the
derivative contract was entered into, there was no amount of cash or other assets paid. Zero cost
justified non-recognition, notwithstanding that as time passes and the value of the underlying
variable (rate, price, or index) changes, the derivative has a positive (asset) or negative (liability)
value.
Initial measurement
Initially, financial assets and liabilities should be measured at fair value (including transaction
costs, for assets and liabilities not measured at fair value through profit or loss). [IAS 39.43]
Subsequently, financial assets and liabilities (including derivatives) should be measured at fair
value, with the following exceptions: [IAS 39.46-47]
Fair value is the amount for which an asset could be exchanged, or a liability settled, between
knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm's length transaction. [IAS 39.9] IAS 39 provides a
hierarchy to be used in determining the fair value for a financial instrument: [IAS 39 Appendix
A, paragraphs AG69-82]
Quoted market prices in an active market are the best evidence of fair value and should
be used, where they exist, to measure the financial instrument.
Amortised cost is calculated using the effective interest method. The effective interest rate is the
rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments or receipts through the expected life of
the financial instrument to the net carrying amount of the financial asset or liability. Financial
assets that are not carried at fair value though profit and loss are subject to an impairment test. If
expected life cannot be determined reliably, then the contractual life is used.
IAS 39 permits entities to designate, at the time of acquisition or issuance, any financial asset or
financial liability to be measured at fair value, with value changes recognised in profit or loss.
This option is available even if the financial asset or financial liability would ordinarily, by its
nature, be measured at amortised cost – but only if fair value can be reliably measured.
In June 2005 the IASB issued its amendment to IAS 39 to restrict the use of the option to
designate any financial asset or any financial liability to be measured at fair value through profit
and loss (the fair value option). The revisions limit the use of the option to those financial
instruments that meet certain conditions: [IAS 39.9]
Impairment
A financial asset or group of assets is impaired, and impairment losses are recognised, only if
there is objective evidence as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial
recognition of the asset. An entity is required to assess at each balance sheet date whether there is
any objective evidence of impairment. If any such evidence exists, the entity is required to do a
detailed impairment calculation to determine whether an impairment loss should be recognised.
[IAS 39.58] The amount of the loss is measured as the difference between the asset's carrying
amount and the present value of estimated cash flows discounted at the financial asset's original
effective interest rate. [IAS 39.63]
Assets that are individually assessed and for which no impairment exists are grouped with
financial assets with similar credit risk statistics and collectively assessed for impairment.
[IAS 39.64]
If, in a subsequent period, the amount of the impairment loss relating to a financial asset carried
at amortised cost or a debt instrument carried as available-for-sale decreases due to an event
occurring after the impairment was originally recognised, the previously recognised impairment
loss is reversed through profit or loss. Impairments relating to investments in available-for-sale
equity instruments are not reversed through profit or loss. [IAS 39.65]
Financial guarantees
A financial guarantee contract is a contract that requires the issuer to make specified payments to
reimburse the holder for a loss it incurs because a specified debtor fails to make payment when
due. [IAS 39.9]
initially at fair value. If the financial guarantee contract was issued in a stand-alone arm's
length transaction to an unrelated party, its fair value at inception is likely to equal the
consideration received, unless there is evidence to the contrary.
subsequently at the higher of (i) the amount determined in accordance with IAS 37
Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets and (ii) the amount initially
recognised less, when appropriate, cumulative amortisation recognised in accordance
with IAS 18 Revenue. (If specified criteria are met, the issuer may use the fair value
option in IAS 39. Furthermore, different requirements continue to apply in the specialised
context of a 'failed' derecognition transaction.)
The basic premise for the derecognition model in IAS 39 is to determine whether the asset under
consideration for derecognition is: [IAS 39.16]
Once the asset under consideration for derecognition has been determined, an assessment is
made as to whether the asset has been transferred, and if so, whether the transfer of that asset is
subsequently eligible for derecognition.
An asset is transferred if either the entity has transferred the contractual rights to receive the cash
flows, or the entity has retained the contractual rights to receive the cash flows from the asset,
but has assumed a contractual obligation to pass those cash flows on under an arrangement that
meets the following three conditions: [IAS 39.17-19]
the entity has no obligation to pay amounts to the eventual recipient unless it collects
equivalent amounts on the original asset
the entity is prohibited from selling or pledging the original asset (other than as security
to the eventual recipient),
the entity has an obligation to remit those cash flows without material delay
Once an entity has determined that the asset has been transferred, it then determines whether or
not it has transferred substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset. If
substantially all the risks and rewards have been transferred, the asset is derecognised. If
substantially all the risks and rewards have been retained, derecognition of the asset is precluded.
[IAS 39.20]
If the entity has neither retained nor transferred substantially all of the risks and rewards of the
asset, then the entity must assess whether it has relinquished control of the asset or not. If the
entity does not control the asset then derecognition is appropriate; however if the entity has
retained control of the asset, then the entity continues to recognise the asset to the extent to
which it has a continuing involvement in the asset. [IAS 39.30]
These various derecognition steps are summarised in the decision tree in AG36.
Hedge accounting
IAS 39 permits hedge accounting under certain circumstances provided that the hedging
relationship is: [IAS 39.88]
formally designated and documented, including the entity's risk management objective
and strategy for undertaking the hedge, identification of the hedging instrument, the
hedged item, the nature of the risk being hedged, and how the entity will assess the
hedging instrument's effectiveness and
expected to be highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows
attributable to the hedged risk as designated and documented, and effectiveness can be
reliably measured and
assessed on an ongoing basis and determined to have been highly effective
Hedging instruments
Hedging instrument is an instrument whose fair value or cash flows are expected to offset
changes in the fair value or cash flows of a designated hedged item. [IAS 39.9]
All derivative contracts with an external counterparty may be designated as hedging instruments
except for some written options. A non-derivative financial asset or liability may not be
designated as a hedging instrument except as a hedge of foreign currency risk. [IAS 39.72]
For hedge accounting purposes, only instruments that involve a party external to the reporting
entity can be designated as a hedging instrument. This applies to intragroup transactions as well
(with the exception of certain foreign currency hedges of forecast intragroup transactions – see
below). However, they may qualify for hedge accounting in individual financial statements.
[IAS 39.73]
Hedged items
Hedged item is an item that exposes the entity to risk of changes in fair value or future cash
flows and is designated as being hedged. [IAS 39.9]
In April 2005, the IASB amended IAS 39 to permit the foreign currency risk of a highly probable
intragroup forecast transaction to qualify as the hedged item in a cash flow hedge in consolidated
financial statements – provided that the transaction is denominated in a currency other than the
functional currency of the entity entering into that transaction and the foreign currency risk will
affect consolidated financial statements. [IAS 39.80]
In 30 July 2008, the IASB amended IAS 39 to clarify two hedge accounting issues:
Effectiveness
Categories of hedges
A fair value hedge is a hedge of the exposure to changes in fair value of a recognised asset or
liability or a previously unrecognised firm commitment or an identified portion of such an asset,
liability or firm commitment, that is attributable to a particular risk and could affect profit or
loss. [IAS 39.86(a)] The gain or loss from the change in fair value of the hedging instrument is
recognised immediately in profit or loss. At the same time the carrying amount of the hedged
A cash flow hedge is a hedge of the exposure to variability in cash flows that (i) is attributable to
a particular risk associated with a recognised asset or liability (such as all or some future interest
payments on variable rate debt) or a highly probable forecast transaction and (ii) could affect
profit or loss. [IAS 39.86(b)] The portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument that is
determined to be an effective hedge is recognised in other comprehensive income. [IAS 39.95]
Same accounting as for recognition of a financial asset or financial liability – any gain or
loss on the hedging instrument that was previously recognised in other comprehensive
income is 'recycled' into profit or loss in the same period(s) in which the non-financial
asset or liability affects profit or loss.
'Basis adjustment' of the acquired non-financial asset or liability – the gain or loss on the
hedging instrument that was previously recognised in other comprehensive income is
removed from equity and is included in the initial cost or other carrying amount of the
acquired non-financial asset or liability.
A hedge of the foreign currency risk of a firm commitment may be accounted for as a fair
value hedge or as a cash flow hedge.
Hedge accounting must be discontinued prospectively if: [IAS 39.91 and 39.101]
For the purpose of measuring the carrying amount of the hedged item when fair value hedge
accounting ceases, a revised effective interest rate is calculated. [IAS 39.BC35A]
If hedge accounting ceases for a cash flow hedge relationship because the forecast transaction is
no longer expected to occur, gains and losses deferred in other comprehensive income must be
taken to profit or loss immediately. If the transaction is still expected to occur and the hedge
relationship ceases, the amounts accumulated in equity will be retained in equity until the hedged
item affects profit or loss. [IAS 39.101(c)]
If a hedged financial instrument that is measured at amortised cost has been adjusted for the gain
or loss attributable to the hedged risk in a fair value hedge, this adjustment is amortised to profit
or loss based on a recalculated effective interest rate on this date such that the adjustment is fully
amortised by the maturity of the instrument. Amortisation may begin as soon as an adjustment
exists and must begin no later than when the hedged item ceases to be adjusted for changes in its
fair value attributable to the risks being hedged.
Disclosure
In 2003 all disclosures about financial instruments were moved to IAS 32, so IAS 32 was
renamed Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation. In 2005, the IASB issued IFRS 7
Financial Instruments: Disclosures to replace the disclosure portions of IAS 32 effective 1
January 2007. IFRS 7 also superseded IAS 30 Disclosures in the Financial Statements of Banks
and Similar Financial Institutions