Lesson 4: Philosophical Reflection MORAL THEOLOGY employs the STOP sign as
guidepost of moral decision making.
Reflection is an activity that requires a person • S = Search out the facts.
to examine his or her thoughts, feelings and • T = Think, reflect and analyze the facts, actions and learn from experience. its negative or positive effects, Thoughts – Cognitive or mental state advantages or disadvantages.
Feelings – Emotional state • O = how it affects Others
Actions – represent to the physical • P = Pray
manifestation or expression of your thoughts and feelings.
➢ According to Gabriel Marcel,
Lesson 5: Knowledge and Truth philosophical reflection is the act of giving time to think about the meaning People are already relying on knowledge and purpose of life. for their survival. ➢ One can reflect on almost any subject. ➢ Philosophical Reflection allows us to Without knowledge on how to create a fire, have opportunities to think more how to cook one’s food, how to build a deeply about our action, our shelter, we would still be in a prehistoric motivations for doing such action, and cave. even its possible consequences. Knowledge enables the humankind to ➢ Philosophical Reflection helps us survive, thrive, and advance throughout understand ourselves and our actions history. The development and application of better. When we reflect, we can judge knowledge has allowed us human to adapt whether our actions or decisions are to our environment, overcome challenges, reasonable or not. improve our quality of life.
TWO TYPES OF REFLECTION EPISTEMOLOGY - deals with the nature of
1. PRIMARY REFLECTION knowledge and knowing. It is a science - is a scientific and logical way of looking at devoted to the discovery of the proper the world or things. It is more objective, it method of acquiring and validating attempts to be neutral, often disregard knowledge personal elements. 2. SECONDARY REFLECTION The purpose of epistemology: - It is more subjective; it involves personal 1. To show how we can acquire dimension of human experiences. Asking knowledge. what does this mean to me? Rather than just “what is this?” focusing on what its meaning 2. To give us a method of to u as individual. demonstrating whether the knowledge we acquired is really knowledge. 2|Page INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY OF THE HUMAN PERSON 2nd-SUMMATIVE-TEST-REVIEWER
KNOWLEDGE is the clear awareness and DOMAINS OF TRUTH
understanding of something.
• it is provided by facts 1. Objective/Scientific domain
• It is based on reality • related to scientific truths • It is observable and evident on • pertains to the natural world that the real world maintains a relative independence from HOW DO WE ACQUIRE KNOWLEDGE the perspective and attitude of human beings that perceived them. 1. Empiricism – by senses 2. Social domain 2. Rationalism – by mind/intellectual thinking • Truth is related to a general agreement 1. EMPIRICISM- EMPIRICISTS: or consensus on what is right as We can acquire 1. John Locke opposed to what is wrong. knowledge using our SENSES. 2. George Berkley • Based on norms (standard of acceptable behavior in society) 3. David Hume 2. RATIONALISM- RATIONALIST: 3. Personal domain We can acquire 1. Rene Descartes • Truth is related to “SINCERITY” knowledge by thinking with the use 2. Baruch Spinoza • consistent to inner thoughts and of our MINDS; intentions needs to establish “trust” knowledge comes 3. Gottfried Wilhelm from intellectual Leibniz TRUTH AND JUSTIFICATION reasoning. • TRUTH (according to Richard Rorty) - has passed the “procedures of justification” PROCESS OF ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE • JUSTIFICATION is the process of proving 1. Reality the truth or validity of a statement. This process is made up of ways of critically 2. Perception testing a claim against certain criteria. 3. Concept Each domain of truth has a corresponding 4. Proposition justification or has a different criterion for truth: TWO TYPES OF PROPOSITIONS 1. Objective/Scientific domain 1. FACTS - propositions or statements observed to be real and truthful • Truths are tested against empirical evidence 2. CLAIM - proposition that requires further examination 3|Page INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY OF THE HUMAN PERSON 2nd-SUMMATIVE-TEST-REVIEWER
2. Social domain TRUTH VS. OPINION
• Truth is tested against their acceptability to a particular group in TRUTH- is knowledge validated based on the a particular time in history facts of reality
3. Personal domain CHARATERISTICS OF TRUTH:
• Truths are tested against the 1. Can be confirmed with other sources consistency and authenticity of the person who claims it 2. Independent of one’s interpretation, preferences and biases
3. Based on the facts of reality
EXAMPLES: EXAMPLES OF TRUTH: 1. “In sickness and in health, ‘till death do 1. All people must breathe to live. us part.” – PERSONAL DOMAIN 2. Manuel L. Quezon was a Philippine president. 2. Reptiles are cold blooded. – OBJECTIVE/SCIENTIFIC DOMAIN 3. Fire needs oxygen to burn.
3. “Don’t talk when your mouth is full.” –
SOCIAL DOMAIN OPINION- judgment of a person about HOW DO WE KNOW IF SOMETHING IS TRUE? something in the world.
1. A belief is true if it can be CHARACTERITICS OF OPINION:
justified or proven through the 1. Cannot be confirmed use of one’s senses. 2. Open to interpretation 2. A belief or statement is true if is based on facts. 3. Based on emotions 3. Getting consensus of having 4. Inherently biased people agree on a common EXAMPLES OF OPINION: belief. 1. All people love basketball. 4. Truth requires to prove an action. 2. Blue is the best color. 5. Subject to test to determine 3. I don’t like broccoli. the truth.