CHAPTER TWO

2. THEORY OF PRODUCTION

Production means an activity by which resources are transformed into a different and more
useful commodity or service with value added. An input is a good or service that goes into the
process of production. An output is any good and service that comes out of production process.

Fixed and Variable inputs

In economics, inputs can be classified as fixed & variable. Fixed inputs are those inputs whose
quantity can not readily be changed when market conditions indicate that an immediate change
in output is required. In fact, no input is ever absolutely fixed, but may be fixed during an
immediate requirement. Variable inputs, on the other hand, are those inputs whose quantity can
be changed almost instantaneously in response to desired changes in output. That is, their
quantity can easily be diminished when the market demand for the product decreases and vice
versa. The best example of variable input is unskilled labor.

Short run vs. long run

In economics, short run refers to that period of time in which the quantity of at least one input is
fixed. For example, if it requires a firm one year to change the quantities of all the inputs, those
time periods below one year are considered as short run. Thus, short run is that time period
which is not sufficient to change the quantities of all inputs, so that at least one input remains
fixed. In short run, therefore, production of a commodity can be increased by increasing the use
of only variable inputs. One thing to be noted here is that short run periods of different firms
have different duration. Some firms can change the quantity of all their inputs with in a month
while it takes more than a year to change the quantity of all inputs for another type of firms. For
example, the time required to change the quantities of inputs in an automobile factory is not
equal with that of flour factory. The later takes relatively shorter time. Long run is that time
period (planning horizon) which is sufficient to change the quantities of all inputs. Thus there is
no fixed input in the long -run.

1
Production function

Production function is a mathematical statement used to describe the technological relationship

between inputs and output in physical terms per period of time given the state of technology.

Q = f(l,k) where Q is physical units of output

l is physical units of labor input

k is physical units of capital input

There can be two kinds of production functions

i. Short run production function

ii. Long run production function

2.1 Production in the short run: Production with one variable input

Production with one variable input (while the others are fixed) is obviously a short run
phenomenon because there is no fixed input in the long run.

Assumption of short run production analysis

In order to simplify the analysis of short run production, the classical economist assumed the
following:

1. Perfect divisibility of inputs and outputs

This assumption implies that factor inputs and outputs are so divisible that one can hire, for
example a fraction of labor, a fraction of manager and we can produce a fraction of output, such
as a fraction of automobile.

2. Limited substitution between inputs

Factor inputs can substitute each other up to a certain point, beyond which they can not substitute
each other.

3. Constant technology

2
They assumed that level of technology of production is constant in the short run.

Suppose a firm that uses two inputs: Capital (which is a fixed input) and labor (which is variable
input). Given the assumptions of short run production, the firm can increase output only by
increasing the amount of labor it uses.

Hence, its production function is

Q = f (L) K - being constant

Where Q is the quantity of production (Output)

L is the quantity of labor used, which is variable, and

K is the quantity of capital (which is fixed)

The production function shows different levels of output that the firm can obtain by efficiently
utilizing different units of labor and the fixed capital. In the above short run production function,
the quantity of capital is fixed. Thus output can change only when the amount of labor used for
production changes. Hence, Q is a function of L only in the short run.

2.1.1 Total product, Marginal product and Average product

Total product: is the total amount of output that can be produced by efficiently utilizing a
specific combination of labor and capital. The total product curve, thus, represents various levels
of output that can be obtained from efficient utilization of various combinations of the variable
input, and the fixed input. It shows the output produced for different amounts of the variable
input, labor.

Increasing the variable input (while some other inputs are fixed) can increase the total product
only up to a certain point. Initially, as we combine more and more units of the variable input with
the fixed input output continues to increase. But eventually, increasing the unit of the variable
input may not help output increase. Even as we employ more and more unit of the variable input
beyond the carrying capacity of a fixed input, output may tends to decline. Thus increasing the
variable input can increase the level of output only up to a certain point, beyond which the total

3
product tends to fall as more and more of the variable input is utilized. This tells us what shape a
total product curve assumes. The shape of the total variable curve is nearly S-shape.

Marginal Product (MP)

The marginal product of variable input is the addition to the total product attributable to the
addition of one unit of the variable input to the production process, other inputs being constant
(fixed).

ΔQ dL ¿
orMPL=dTP¿ ¿
MPL = ΔL ¿
Thus, MPL measures the slope of the total product curve at a given point. In the short run, the
MP of the variable input first increases reaches its maximum and then tends to decrease to the
extent of being negative. That is, as we continue to combine more and more of the variable
inputs with the fixed input, the marginal product of the variable input increases initially and then
declines.

Average Product (AP)

The AP of an input is the ratio of total output to the number of variable inputs.

totalproduct TP
APlabour= =
numberofL L

The average product of labor first increases with the number of labor (i.e. TP increases faster
than the increase in labor), and eventually it declines.

Graphing the short run production curves

The following figures shows how the TP, MP and AP of the variable (labor) input vary with the
number of the variable input.

4
 Output

TP3

TP2
TP

TP1

L1 L2 L3 Units of labor (variable input)

APL, MPL

APL

Units of labor (variable input)

L1 L2 L3
MPL
As the number of the labor hired increases (capital being fixed), the TP curve first rises, reaches
its maximum when L3 amount of labor is employed, beyond which it tends to decline. Assuming
that this short run production curve represents a certain car manufacturing industry, it implies
that L3 numbers of workers are required to efficiently run the machineries. If the numbers of
workers fall below L3, the machine is not fully operating, resulting in a fall in TP below TP3. On
the other hand, increasing the number of workers above L3 will do nothing for the production

5
process because only L3 number of workers can efficiently run the machine. Increasing the
number of workers above L3, rather results in lower total product because it results in
overcrowded and unfavorable working environment.

Marginal product curve increases until L 1 number of labor reaches its maximum at L 1, and then it
tends to fall. The MPL is zero at L3 (when the TP is maximal); beyond which its value assumes
zero indicating that each additional worker above L3 tends to create over crowded working
condition and reduces the total product. Thus, in the short run (where some inputs are fixed), the
marginal product of successive units of labor hired increases initially, but not continuously,
resulting in the limit to the total production. Geometrically, the MP curve measures the slope of
the TP. The slope of the TP curve increases (MP increases) up to L1, it decreases from L1 to L3
and it becomes negative beyond L3.

The average product curve increases up to L2, beyond which it continuously declines. The AP
curve can be measured by the slope of rays originating from the origin to a point on the TP
curve. For example, the APL at L2 is the ratio of TP2 to L2. This is identical to the slope of ray
a.

The relationship between AP and MP of the variable input

The relationship between MPL and APL can be stated as follows:

 For all number of workers (Labor) below L2, MPL lies above APL.
 At L2, MPL and APL are equal.
 Beyond L2, MPL lies below the APL
Thus, the MPL curve passes through the maximum of the APL curve from above. This
relationship between APL and MPL can be shown algebraically as follows:

Now – when MPL > APL, Slope of APL is positive (APL rises)

 When MPL = APL, Slope of APL is zero (APL is at its maximum).

 When MPL < APL, Slope of APL is negative (APL falls)

6
 2.1.2 The Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns (LDMR): Short –Run Law of
Production
The LDMR states that as the use of an input increases in equal increments (with other inputs
being fixed), a point will eventually be reached at which the resulting additions to output
decreases. When the labor input is small (and capital is fixed), extra labor adds considerably to
output, often because workers get the chance to specialize in one or few tasks. Eventually,
however, the LDMR operates: when the number of workers increases further, some workers will
inevitably become ineffective and the MPL falls.

Note that the LDMR operates (MP of successive units of labor decreases) not because highly
qualified laborers are hired first and the least qualified last. Diminishing marginal returns results
from limitations on the use of other fixed inputs (e.g. machinery), not from decline in worker
quality.

The LDMR applies to a given production technology (when the level of technology is fixed).
Over time, however, technological improvements in the production process may allow the entire
total product curve shift upward, so that more output can be produced with the same input.

Efficient Region of Production in the short-run

 Stage I – ranges from the origin to the point of equality of the APL and MPL.
 Stage II – starts from the point of equality of MPL and APL and ends at a point where
MP is equal to zero.
 Stage III – covers the range of labor over which the MPL is negative.
Obviously, a firm should not operate in stage III because in this stage additional units of variable
input are contributing negatively to the total product (MP of the variable input is negative)
because of overcrowded working environment i.e., the fixed input is over utilized.

Stage I is also not an efficient region of production though the MP of variable input is positive.
The reason is that the variable input (the number of workers) is too small to efficiently run the
fixed input; so that the fixed input is underutilized (not efficiently utilized).

Thus, the efficient region of production is stage II. At this stage additional inputs are contributing
positively to the total product and MP of successive units of variable input is declining

7
(indicating that the fixed input is being optimally used). Hence, the efficient region of production
is over that range of employment of variable input where the marginal product of the variable
input is declining but positive.

2.2 Long run Production: Production with two variable inputs

For the sake of simplicity, assume that the firm uses two inputs (labor and capital) and both are
variable.

The firm can now produce its output in a variety of ways by combining different amounts of
labor and capital. With both factors’ variable, a firm can usually produce a given level of output
by using a great deal of labor and very little capital or a great deal of capital and very little labor
or moderate amount of both. In this section, we will see how a firm can choose among
combinations of labor and capital that generate the same output. To do so, we make the use of
isoquant. So it is necessary to first see what is meant by isoquants and their properties.

2.2.1 Isoquants

An isoquant is a curve that shows all possible efficient combinations of inputs that can yield
equal level of output. If both labor and capital are variable inputs, the production function will
have the following form.

Q = f (L, K)

Given this production function, the equation of an isoquant, where output is held constant at q is

q = f (L, K)

Thus, isoquants show the flexibility that firms have when making production decision: they can
usually obtain a particular output (q) by substituting one input for the other.

Isoquant maps: when a number of isoquants are combined in a single graph, we call the graph
an isoquant map. An isoquant map is another way of describing a production function. Each
isoquant represents a different level of output and the level of out puts increases as we move up
and to the right. The following figure shows isoquants and isoquant map.

8
Capital

q3
q2
3 q1

1
2
Labor
1 3 6

Properties of isoquants

Isoquants have most of the same properties as indifference curves. The biggest difference
between them is that output is constant along an isoquant where as indifference curves hold
utility constant. Most of the properties of isoquants, results from the word ‘efficient’ in its
definition.

1. Isoquants slope down ward. Because isoquants denote efficient combination of inputs that
yield the same output, isoquants always have negative slope. Isoquants can never be horizontal,
vertical or upward sloping. If for example, isoquants have to assume zero slopes (horizontal line)
only one point on the isoquant is efficient.

Thus, efficiently requires that isoquants must be negatively sloped. As employment of one factor
increases, the employment of the other factor must decrease to produce the same quantity
efficiently.

If for example, isoquants have to assume zero slopes (horizontal line) only one point on the
isoquant is efficient. See the following figures.

9
 100kg Capital 100kg
Capital Capital
wheat teff

A 100kg
B
teff A
A

Labor Labor
2 5
5

A B C
An isoquant can never be In this figure, a firm can produce In this figure, all points above
horizontal. In this figure, the 100kg of wheat by using any point A utilize higher combination
firm can produce 100kg of combination of labor and capital of both inputs to produce the
teff by using either of the along the isoquant. But only point same output (100 kg coffee).
following alternatives: 4 A is efficient. For example, point Point A shows the least
capital and 2 labor,4 capital B shows the same number of combination of inputs that can
and 5 labor or any other labor as point A, but higher yield 100 kg coffees. Thus all
combination of labor and capital. Thus point B is in efficient other points are inefficient and
capital along the curve. because it shows higher not part of the isoquants.
Obviously, only the first combination of inputs. Thus,
alternative is efficient as it isoquants can never be vertical
uses the least possible line
combination of inputs. Thus,
all points, except A, are
inefficient and not part of
isoquant.

Thus, efficiently requires that isoquants must be negatively sloped. As employment of one factor
increases, the employment of the other factor must decrease to produce the same quantity
efficiently.

2. The further an isoquant lays away from the origin, the greater the level of output it
denotes. Higher isoquants (isoquants further from the origin) denote higher combination of

10
 inputs. The more inputs used, more outputs should be obtained if the firm is producing
efficiently. Thus efficiency requires that higher isoquants must denote higher level of output.

3. Isoquants do not cross each other. This is because such intersections are inconsistent with
the definition of isoquants.

q=50

Q=20

K*

L*

This figure shows that the firm can produce at either output level (20 or 50) with the same
combination of labor and capital (L* and K*). The firm must be producing inefficiently if it
produces q = 20, because it could produce q = 50 by the same combination of labor and capital
(L* and K*). Thus, efficiency requires that isoquants do not cross each other.

4. Isoquants must be thin. If isoquants are thick, some points on the isoquant will become
inefficient. Consider the following isoquant.

Capital

K1 A

K2 B

q
L1 Labor

11
 Iso quants can never be thick. Points A and B are on the same iso quant. But point A denotes
higher amount of capital and the same amount of labor as point B. Hence point A denotes
inefficient combination of inputs and thus it lies out of the iso quant. The iso-quant should be thin
if point A is to be excluded from the iso quant.

Shape of isoquants

Isoquants can have different shapes (curvature) depending on the degree to which factor inputs
can substitute each other.

1-Linear isoquants

Isoquants would be linear when labor and capital are perfect substitutes for each other. In this
case the slope of an isoquant is constant. As a result, the same output can be produced with only
capital or only labor or an infinite combination of both. Graphically,

K
10

q=100
8

L
12 15

2. Fixed factor proportion and L shaped isoquant

When production function assumes a fixed proportion between k and l, the isoquant takes ‘L’
shape. Such an isoquant assumes zero substitutability between k and l. Instead it assumes perfect
complementarity between factors. That is, k and l are treated as perfect complements to one

12
 another. It also implies that if quantity of an input is increased, quantity of another input held
constant, there will be no change in the output. Thus, output can be increased only by increasing
both inputs proportionally.

q3

q2
K2

q1
K1

L
L1 L2

3. Kinked isoquants

This assumes limited substitution between inputs. Inputs can substitute each other only at some
points. Thus, the isoquant is kinked and there are only a few alternative combinations of inputs to
produce a given level of output. These isoquants are also called linear programming isoquants or
activity analysis isoquants. See the figure below.
K

A
7
12
5

B
3

1 3 5 9D

13
 4. Smooth, convex isoquants

This shape of isoquant assumes continuous substitution of capital and labor over a certain range,
beyond which factors cannot substitute each other. Basically, kinked isoquants are more realistic:
There is often limited (not infinite) method of producing a given level of output. However,
traditional economic theory mostly adopted the continuous isoquants because they are
mathematically simple to handle by the simple rule of calculus, and they are approximation of
the more realistic isoquants (the kidded isoquants). From now on we use the smooth and convex
isoquants to analyze the long run production.

∆K=4

∆K=2 ∆K=1/2
∆L=1
Q
∆L=1

∆L=1

This type of isoquant is the limiting case of the kinked isoquant when the number kink is infinite.
The slope of the iso quant decrease as we move from the top (left) to the right (bottom) along the
isoquant. This indicates that the amount by which the quantity of one input (capital)can be
reduced when one extra unit of another inputs(labor)is used ( so that out put remains constant)
decreases as more of the latter input (labor)is used.

2.2.2 The slope of an isoquant: Marginal Rate of Technical Substitution (MRTS)

The slope of an isoquant (-K/L) indicates how the quantity of one input can be traded off
against the quantity of the other, while output is held constant. The absolute value of the slope

14
of an isoquant is called marginal rate of technical substitution (MRTS). The MRTS shows the
amount by which the quantity of one input can be reduced when one extra unit of another input is
used, so that output remains constant. MRTS of labor for capital, denoted as MRTS L, K shows the
amount by which the input of capital can be reduced when one extra unit of labor is used, so that
output remains constant.

This is analogues to the marginal rate of substitution (MRS) in consumer theory.

MRTS L,K decreases as the firm continues to substitute labor for capital (or as more of labor is
used). Hence, the firm reduces lower and lower number of capital for the successive one unit of
labor.

The reason is that when the number of capital is large and that of labor is low, the productivity of
capital is relatively lower and that of labor is higher (due to the low of diminishing marginal
returns). Thus, at this point relatively large amount of capital is required to replace one unit of
labor (or one unit of labor can replace relatively large amount of capital). As the employment of
labor increases and that of capital decreases (as we move down ward along the isoquant), quite
the reverse will happen. That is, productivity of capital increases and that of labor decreases.
Hence, the amount of capital that needs to be reduced increase when one extra labor is used
decreases. The fact that the slope of an isoquant is decreasing makes an isoquant convex to the
origin.

MRTS L, K (the slope of isoquant) can also be given by the ratio of marginal products of
factors. That is,

ΔK MPL
MRTS L, K =− =
ΔL MPK

2.2.3 Technological process and production function

Technological improvement (progress) makes factors of production more productive or it makes

production system more efficient; so that the firm will get higher output from the same
combinations of labor and capital than before.

15
 Graphically, this can be shown by upward movement of the total product curve (indicating
higher output level can be achieved from the same input) and down ward movement of isoquant
denoting lower combinations of factors of production can produce equal level of output. See the
figures

TP2 TP after
technological
advancement
Isoquant before
TP before technological
technological K1 advancement
advancement
TP1
K2 Isoquant after
technological
advancement

L1 L2 L1

2.2.4 The efficient region of production: long run

In principle the marginal product of a factor may assume any value, positive, zero or negative.
However, the basic production theory concentrates only on the efficient part of the production
function, i.e. over the range of out put over which the marginal product of factors are positive
and declining. In the short run production function efficient region of production prevails in
∂ MPL
stage two (stage II), where MPL >O, but ∂ L < 0.

Similarly, efficient region of production in the long run prevails when the marginal product of all
variable inputs is positive but decreasing. Graphically this can be represented by the negatively
slopped part of an isoquant. The locus of points of isoquants where the marginal products of
factors are zero form the ridge lines. The upper ridge line implies that the MP of capital is zero.

16
MPk is negative for all points above the upper ridge line and positive for points below the ridge
line. The lower ridge line implies that the MPL is zero. For all points below the lower ridge line
the MPL is negative and positive for points above the line. Production techniques are technically
efficient inside the ridge lines symbolically; in the long run efficient production region can be
illustrated as:

∂ MPL ∂ MPk
MPL >0, but ∂ L <0 MPk >0, but ∂ K <0

Graphically, efficient region of production is shown as follow:

Capital

Upper ridge line

Lower ridge line

q3

q2

q1
Labor

Thus efficient region of production is defined by the range of isoquants over which they are
convex to the origin.

2.2.5 The long run law of production: The law of returns to scale

The laws of production describe the technically possible ways of increasing the level of
production. Output may increase in various ways. In the long run output can be increased by
changing all factors of production. This long run analysis of production is called Law of returns
to scale. In the short run output may be increased by using more of the variable factor, while
capital (and possibly other factors as well) are kept constant. The expansion of output with one
factor (at least) constant is described by the law of variable proportion or the law of (eventually)
diminishing returns of the variable factor.

17
Now let’s have a deep examination of law of returns to scale.

Laws of returns to scale: long run analysis of production

In the long run all inputs are variable. Expansion of output may be achieved by varying all
factors of production by the same proportion or by different proportions.

The traditional theory of production concentrates on the first case, i.e. the study of output as all
inputs change by the same proportion. The term returns to scale refers to the change in output as
all factors change by the same proportion. Suppose initially the production function is

X0 = f (L, K)

If we increase all factors by the same proportion t, we clearly obtain a new level of output X*
where,

X* = f (tL, tK)

 If X* increases by the same proportion t or if X* = tX 0, we say that there is constant

returns to scale.
 If X* increases less than proportionally with the increase in the factors (or if X*
increases by a proportion less than t), we have decreasing returns to scale.
 If X* increases more than proportionally with the increase in the factors (by a more
than t proportion), we have increasing returns to scale.

2.2.6 Equilibrium of the firm: Choice of optimal combination of factors of production

Dear learner, in our previous discussion we have said that an isoquant denotes efficient
combination of labor and capital required to produce a given level of out put. But, this does not
mean that the monetary cost of producing a given level of out put is constant along an isoquant.
That is, though different combinations of labor and capital on a given isoquant yield the same
level of out put, the cost of these different combinations of labor and capital could differ because
the prices of the inputs can differ. Thus, isoquant shows only technically efficient combinations
of inputs, not economically efficient combinations. Technical efficiency takes in to account the
physical quantity of inputs where as economic efficiency goes beyond technical efficiency and

18
seeks to find the least cost (in monetary terms) combination of inputs among the various
technically efficient combinations. Hence, technical efficiency is a necessary condition, but not a
sufficient condition for economic efficiency. To determine the economically efficient input
combinations we need to have the prices of inputs.

To determine the economically efficient input combination, the following simplifying

assumptions hold true:

Assumptions

1. The goal of the firm is maximization of profit (∏ ¿¿) where ∏ ¿ R−C

Where ∏ ¿¿-Profit, R-revenue and C-is cost outlay.

2. The price of the product is given and it is equal to

PX .

3. The prices of inputs are given (constant).Price of a unit of labor is w and that of capital is
r.
Now before we go to the discussion of optimal input combination (or economically efficient
combination), we need to know the isocost line, because optimal input is defined by the tangency
of the isoquant and isocost line.

2.2.6.1 Isocost line

Do you remember what the budget line denotes?

Isocost lines have most of the same properties as that of budget lines, an isocost line is the locus
points denoting all combination of factors that a firm can purchase with a given monetary outlay,
given prices of factors.

Suppose the firm has C amount of cost out lay (budget) and prices of labor and capital are w and
r respectively. The equation of the firm’s isocost line is given as:

C=rK +wL , where K and L are quantities of capital and labor respectively.

19
Given the cost outlayC , the maximum amounts of capital and labor that the firm can purchase
C C
are equal to r and w respectively. The straight line that connects these points is the iso-cost
line. See the following figure:

capital

C/r

Iso cost
line

Labor
C/w

iso cost line: shows different combinations of labor and capital that the firm can buy given the
cost out lay and prices of the inputs.

Now we are in a position to determine the firm’s optimal in put combination. However, the
problem of determining optimal input combination (economic efficiency) takes two forms.
Sometimes, situations may happen when a firm has a constant cost outlay and seek to maximize
its output, given this constant and cost out lay and prices of inputs. Still, there are also situations
when the goal of the firm is to produce a predetermined (given) level of output with the least
possible cost. Under we will discuss the two situations separately.

Case1: Maximization of output subject to cost constraint

Suppose a firm having a fixed cost out lay (money budget) which is shown by its iso-cost line.
Here, the firm is in equilibrium when it produces the maximum possible out put, given the cost
outlay and prices of input. The equilibrium point (economically efficient combination) is

20
graphically defined by the tangency of the firm’s iso-cost line (showing the budget constraint)
w
with the highest possible isoquant. At this point, the slope of the iso cost line ( r ) is equal to the
MP L
slope of the isoquant ( MP K ).

The condition of equilibrium under this case is, thus:

w MP L MP L MP K
= or =
r MP K w r

This is the first order (necessary) condition. The second order (sufficient) condition is that
isoquant must be convex to the origin. See the following figure:

Capital

K1 E Q3

Q2
Q1

L1 B Labor

the optimal combination of inputs ( L1 and K 1 ) is defined by the tangency of the iso-cost line (AB)
w
and the highest possible isoquant ( X 2 ), at point E. At this point the slope of iso-cost line ( r ) is

21
 MP L
equal to the slope of isoquant X 2 ( MP K ).The second order condition is also satisfied by the
convexity of the isoquant.

Do you think that the point of tangency of the iso-cost line and the isoquant represents
equilibrium point when the isoquant is concave?

Mathematical derivation of the equilibrium condition

The problem can be stated as:

Maximize X =f (L , K ).. . .. .. . .. .. . .. .. . .. .. . .. .Objective function

Subject to C=wL+rK ..........................Constraint function

or C=wL+rK −C=0
We use the lagrangian method to solve the problem.

The lagrangian equation is written as:

φ=X −λ(C )

∂ φ ∂φ ∂φ
, , and
Then we find ∂ L ∂ K ∂ λ and set all of them equal to zero to solve for L and K .

That is,

φ=X −λ( wL+rK −C )

∂φ ∂X MP L
= −wL=0 ⇒ MP L=wλ ⇒ λ=
And, ∂ L ∂L w

∂φ ∂X MP K
= −rλ=0 ⇒ MP K =rλ ⇒ λ=
∂K ∂K r

∂φ
=−wL−rK + w=0 ⇒wL+rK =C
∂λ

22
Solving these equations simultaneously, we obtain the equilibrium condition

MP L MP K w MP L
= or =
w r r MP K

The second order condition (the convexity of isoquant) would be insured when:

( )( ) ( )
2
∂2 X ∂2 X ∂2 X ∂2 X ∂2 X
<0 , < 0 and <
∂ L2 ∂ K2 ∂ L2 ∂ K2 ∂L∂K

Numerical Example

1/2 1/2
Suppose the production function of a firm is given as X =0 .5 L K prices of labor and capital
are given as $ 5 and $ 10 respectively, and the firm has a constant cost out lay of $ 600.Find the
combination of labor and capital that maximizes the firm’s out put and the maximum out put.

Solution

MP L MP K MP L w
= or =
The condition of equilibrium is w r MP K r

∂X ∂X
MP L= =0 . 25 L−1 /2 K 1 /2 MP K = =0 .25 L1/2 K −1/2
∂L ∂K

Thus, the equilibrium exists when,

0 .25 L−1/2 K −1/2 $ 5

=
0 .25 L−1/2 K −1/2 $ 10

K 1
= ⇒ L=2 K ...................................(1)
L 2

The constraint equation is:

wL+rK=C
5 L+10K =600......................................(2)

Solving equation (1) and (2) would give us the optimal combination of L and K.

23
 L=2 K
5 L+10 K =600

⇒ L=60 units and K=30 units.

Thus, the firm should use 60 units of labor and 30 units of capital to maximize its production
(out put). (Check the second order condition).

The maximum out put can be found by substituting 60 and 30 for L and K in the production
process.

Case -2: Minimization of cost for a given level of output

In this case, consider an entrepreneur (a firm) who wants to produce a given output (for example
a bridge or a building or x tones of a commodity) with minimum cost outlay. That is, we have a
single isoquant which denotes the desired level of output, but there are a set of isocost lines
which denotes the different cost outlays. Higher isocost lines denote higher production costs. The
production costs of a desired level of output will therefore be minimized when the isoquant line
is tangent to the lowest possible isocost line (see fig) At the point of tangency, the slope of the
w MPL
=
isoquant and isocost lines are identical. That is r MPK

Capital

c
a
E
K1
Q Labor

b d f
L1

24
the equilibrium combination of factors is K 1 and L1 amounts of capital and labor respectively.
Lower isocost lines such as ‘ab’ are economically desirable but un attainable given the desired
level of output. So point E shows the least cost combination of labor and capital to produce X
amount of output.

Now let us see the mathematical derivation of the equilibrium condition. As mentioned earlier,
we minimize the cost of producing a given level of output.

Thus, the problem can be stated as:

Minimize C = f (q) = WL + rK ---------------------------------------- (Objective function)

Subject to q = f (L, K) ------------------------------------------------ (Constraint function)

Or f (L, K) – q = 0

We use the LaGrange an method to obtain the equilibrium condition. Accordingly, the LaGrange
an function will be:

φ=C−λ (f ( L , K )−q)

φ=WL+rK −λ (f ( L , K )−q )

∂ φ ∂φ ∂φ
, and
The condition of equilibrium will be obtained by finding ∂ L ∂ K ∂ λ and then solving them
simultaneous after equating each to zero. That is

∂φ ∂f (L,K ) w
=w−λ =0 w−λ MPL=0 ⇒ λ=
∂L ∂L MPL

∂φ ∂ f ( L, K ) r
=r −λ =0 r −λ MPK=0⇒ λ=
∂K ∂K MPK

∂φ
=f ( L , K )−q=0
∂λ

25
 w r
=
Thus, the equilibrium condition is MPL MPK

MPL w
=
Rearranging the above condition, we obtain MPK r

( = )
MPL W
This condition MPK r is only a necessary condition .

The sufficient condition is that the isoquant must be convex to the origin. That is

( )( ) ( )
2
∂2 q ∂2 q ∂2 q ∂2 q ∂2 X
<0 , 2 <0 and >
∂ L2 ∂k ∂ L2 ∂k 2 ∂ L ∂ K

Numerical example:

Suppose a certain contractor wants to maximize  from building one bridge. The contractor uses
both labor and capital, and efficient combinations of Labor and capital that are sufficient to make
1 1
2 2
a bridge is by the function 0.25 L K . If the prices of labor (w) and capital (r) are $ 5 and $ 10
respectively.

Find the least cost combination of L and K, and the minimum cost.

26