Lecture 3 Instrumentation-1
Lecture 3 Instrumentation-1
BME-301
Lecture -3
11-09-2024
Problems encountered in measuring
biopotentials of the human body
1.Systematic Errors:
1. Definition: Systematic errors are consistent, repeatable errors that are
introduced by a particular factor or factors that skew all measurements
in a specific direction (either too high or too low).
2. Causes:
1.Instrumental bias (e.g., a scale that always reads 0.5 kg more than
the actual weight).
2.Flawed experimental design or procedure.
3.Human bias in reading instruments or taking measurements.
4.Environmental conditions that aren’t accounted for (e.g., a
thermometer that isn’t properly shielded from radiant heat sources).
5.Incorrect calibration of equipment.
Statistical Control
3. Characteristics:
1. They are consistent and have the same magnitude and direction.
2. They can be identified and corrected.
3. If not detected, they can seriously jeopardize the validity of the
experimental results.
4. Correction: Systematic errors can often be minimized by calibration of
the measurement instrument, using alternative measurement
techniques, or by compensating for the known sources of errors.
Statistical Control
1.Random Errors:
1. Definition: Random errors are statistical fluctuations (in either
direction) in the measured data due to the precision limitations of
the measurement device.
2. Causes:
1.Unpredictable fluctuations in readings.
2.Inherent limitations in the measuring instrument.
3.External environmental effects like sudden temperature changes.
4.Human errors that occur randomly, like momentary lapses in
attention.
Statistical Control
3.Characteristics:
1.They have no consistent pattern (i.e., sometimes too high,
sometimes too low).
2.They tend to average out over multiple measurements.
3.Their effects can be reduced, but not entirely eliminated, by taking
multiple measurements and then averaging the results.
4.Correction: Random errors cannot be eliminated but can be reduced by
improving experimental design and technique. Statistical methods, such
as standard deviation and error propagation, can be used to estimate the
uncertainty introduced by random errors.
Statistical Control
o Any systematic errors or bias can be
removed by calibration and correction
factors, but random variations pose a
more difficult problem.
o Random errors makes output
unreproducible.
o If the cause of variability cannot be
eliminated, statistical analysis must be
done.
o Make multiple measurements and
averaging the results can improve the
estimate of the true value.
Statistical Control
o Systematic errors Result from a variety of factors
n Using the instrument at atemperature other than the
calibrated temperature
n Aging of the components will change the sensor response
and hence the calibration
n The measurement process changes the measurand (i.e.,
loading errors)
n Signal path of the measurement process
n Human observers (i.e., parallax errors)
Factors that can contribute to sensitivity drift include component aging, changes
in ambient conditions (e.g., temperature, humidity), mechanical wear, and long-
term instabilities in electronic components.
Implications:
Sensitivity drift can lead to inaccurate measurements. Even if the instrument is
correctly calibrated at a single point, the changed sensitivity can cause it to
respond differently to other input levels than it would have when it was initially
calibrated.
Sensistivity Drift
ECG (Electrocardiogram) Machine:
An ECG machine measures the electrical activity of the heart over time. Let's say
the machine is designed such that a 1-mV change in heart electrical activity leads
to a 1-cm movement of the ECG pen on paper (or equivalent display change in
digital devices).
Over time, due to sensitivity drift, a 1-mV change in heart electrical activity might
now result in a 0.8-cm movement (reduced sensitivity) or a 1.2-cm movement
(increased sensitivity) of the ECG pen. This would lead to misrepresentations of
the heart's electrical activity, which could potentially lead to misdiagnoses.
Regular calibration, maintenance, and checking against known standards can help
in identifying and correcting sensitivity drift, ensuring that medical instruments
remain accurate and reliable.
Two Point Calibration
o A Two Point calibration essentially rescales the
output and is capable of correcting both slope and
offset errors. Two point calibration can be used in
cases where the sensor output is known to be
reasonably linear over the measurement range.
o To perform a two point calibration:
n 1. Take two measurement with your sensor: One near
the low end of the measurement range and one near the
high end of the measurement range. Record these
readings as "RawLow" and "RawHigh"
n 2.Repeat these measurements with your reference
instrument. Record these readings as "ReferenceLow"
and "ReferenceHigh"
n 3. Calculate "RawRange" as RawHigh – RawLow.
n 4.Calculate "ReferenceRange" as ReferenceHigh –
ReferenceLow
n 5.In your code, calculate the "CorrectedValue" using the
formula below:
n CorrectedValue = (((RawValue – RawLow) *
ReferenceRange) / RawRange) + ReferenceLow
Two Point Calibration
Two-point calibration is a method used to adjust an instrument so
that its output corresponds accurately to two known input values.
This calibration technique assumes that the instrument's response
between these two points is linear, allowing for a more reliable
calibration across a range of measurements compared to a one-
point calibration.