Block 3
Block 3
T]NIT 2
Ethnic Relation, Conflict and Change 18
T]NIT 3
Tiibal Identity in the Modern World 33
T]NIT 4
Structural Conflict in Sectors of Tlibal Develop,ment 48
EXPERT COMMITTEE
Dr. Bipin Jojo Dr Sargbnifa S.Acharya
Prof. Ramdayal Munda
Centre for Social Justice Centre for Social lvledicine
FormerMce-Chancellot
andGovemance and Community Health
Ranchi University
School ofSocialWork Jawaharlal Nehru University
ftarkiand-834008
TISS, Deonar, Mumbai400088 New Delhi-110068
PRINTPRODUCTION
Mr. Kulwant Singh
Assistant Registrar (P)
IGNOU, NewDelhi
September, 20 I 8
Open tJniversit!, 2018
@ ,lndira Gandhi Nqtionol
ISBN : 978-93-87237-67-4
All rights resened. part of this ntork may be reproduced in any form' b1' mimeograph or
No
means, withottt permission in writing from the Indiro Gandhi
National Open
ory irh",
Uuivers iry.
s courses may be
Further information (lbout the Indira Gtlndhi National Open []niversity
Garhi, Delhi-110 068
obtain"d ft om the lJniversity's Olfice at Maidan Neu'
Unit 2 is about the 'Ethnic Relation, Conflict and Change'. The concept
of ethnicity has been discussed in this unit vis-d-vis the ethnic relations in India
in the tribal context. It also throws light on the theoretical perspectives in ethnic
conflicts and the cause and effects of ffibal conflicts.
1.1 lntroduction
1 .3 Definition of Equality
1.0 OBJECTIVES
After studying the unit you should be able to:
o Understand the concept of difference of equality, inequality and difference
among tribals;
1.1 INTRODUCTION
In this unit, we will try to understand the concepts of equality, inequality and
'
difference in relation to tribal problems and issues. Tribes in lndian are socially
and culturally different from others. Accommodating the tribal demands for
cultural recognition and continuity within the Indian nation state has been a
challenge to the government and civil society for aimost six decades. Many
unresolved issues in tribal identity and related problems can be better
understood by studying these concepts and their practice.
Thusinequalitybetweencommunitiesanddifferentialtfeatmentforsome
co-muniiies at the cost of others did not cause a rqajor problern' as these
societies did not accept equality or democracy as a value' The role of the
state was to maintain the social order. Thus, it had a harmonic system of
stratification in which the dominant values in society and the existing siruation Concept of Differ€nce
and IneqalitY h Tribal
were congruent. Though pre-modern societies were pluralistic with many Contert
communities coexisting. Each of these communities had a particular position
in the society which determined their rights and duties, and how they interacted
with others and social inequality was accepted as value and principle in pre-
modem societies. The role of the state was to preserve the social order rather
than change it.
The idea of equality evolved in Europe with the revolutions in France, England
and United States. The French Revolution and the American War of
Independence were violent expressions ofrevolt against the traditional social
order. The French Revolution attacked and removed the privileges of the
aristocracy and the clergy. According to the new system, every individual was
treated equally and no one, regardless ofhis position in society, had special
rights and priviieges. Similarly, the American constitution after the War included
the Bill of Rights which ensured equality to its citizens. It separated the
Church (religion) and State (government) mainly to avoid the government
fron discriminating its citizens because of their religion (or denomination)
being different from the majority religion (or denomination).The French
revolution and the American Constitution heralded a new period in history
where equality was accepted as a fundamental principle. But it was only a
beginning of a long process where the idea of equality would be c1arified,
expanded and made part ofstate policy. Firstly, the idea of equality was seen
here in a limited form- legal equality and the abolition ofpriviieges to certain
privileged groups like the aristocracy. It did not say anything about existing
equaiities which were reflected in the unequal social and economic condition
ofthe people. Secondly, there were large sections of society that were excluded
from the ambit of equal treatment-women, slaves, colonized people and
outsiders. These sections had to wait for many, many more years or even
centuries to be recognized as being worthy of equal and fair treatment. Women
had to struggle till the ear$ twentieth cenhry to get voting rights and the Afro
Americans became equal to their white compatriots only after the Civil War.
Needless to say discrimination ofthese sections continues to happen on a
smaller scale in the society even after these monumental events.
Baker describes the principle ofequality in these words "Just as each person,
because he is a person, is free agent in the scheme ofthe State, so also each
person, because he is a person, as all other persons, has an equal standing,
and counts equally as a legal factor, under the scheme". Similarly ". . ...means
that what ever conditions are guaranteed to me, in the form ofrights, shall
also, and to the same measure, be guaranteed to others. and that whatever
rights to others shall also be given to me". Thus equality is only the basic
condition that is provided to all; how they make use of it is up to them. Thus
the principle ofequality gives the same starting point to all but how they finish
depends on the individuals. "Law is giver of legal capacities and of legal
capacities only. Burke's dictum that "All men have equal rights but not to
equal things" is applicable here.
The principle of legalistic equality had limited impact in societies with a history
of gross social'inequality. For example, it would be unreasonable to expect
two individuals from different social background to be treated equally- an
individual raised in privileged family with all facilities will be more meritorious
than an individual raised in family with minimal or no facilities. There should
be a certain degree of equality of opporhrnity if the principle of equality has
to be realized.
Harold Laski gives a broader idea of equality with the following characteristics : Concept of Difference
and Ineqality in Ttibal
he i) No special privileges for any individual or group; Context
0s.
lty ii) Equal opportunity for all as it gives everybody opportunity to educate
ris and equip himself. Further, he can use his skills and talents to get the
to desired things in life;
rte
iii) Equal access to social benefiti for all and no restrictions based on any
extraneous factors; and
--'1
According to this definition, the principle of equality should have not only
legalistic equality but also equality of opportunity and equal access to social
benefits. An even broader definition of equality then emerged. Bryan Tumer
in his work 'Equality' has given the following characteristics:
hat
The principle of equality includes - equality of conditions and equality of
outcomes. It is not enough that there is legal equality and equality ofopporhrnity
MS
il1. but also equality in conditions in society and equality ofoutcomes or results.
ll)'. Equality of outcomes is the achievement of a given set of positive circumstances
ES.
for a particular group or category. Thus, various communities and groups in
set a society should not experiences vast differences in.their standard of living.
fa The state should take proactive steps including progressive taxation and other
Rnt
measures to redistribute wealth.
The various dimensions of equality are : (1) Political equality (2) Economic
0n. equality (3) Legal equality, and (4) Sociai. Equality as we have seen is a
)ch
widely accep,ted idea. Yet inequality in different dimensions persists in all
09. societies. The United States ofAmerica has wide range of social inequalities
uts
in terms of income levels; Afro Americans on an- average eam less than their
all white Americans. Similarly, in France the birth place of the popular slogan
'Equality, Liberty and Fratemity" the Black, Muslim migrants and their
sic successive generatioi.rs experience discrimination. Like in USA, their average
tus income levels are much lesser than their white counterparts.
ish CheckYour Progress II
Bat
:to Note: Use the space provided for your answer.
Not a1l social differences are valued according to qualities and set in a hierarchy.
The type and nature olquality decided for valuation depends on the nature
and type of society. For example, pre-modern societies valued aged people
for their wisdom and experience while modern societies neglect them by
attributing negative qualities oflack of energy and 1ow updation ofknowledge
etc. Many social differences are also ignored or not even seen as being
worthy ofnotice. They may later on in a different situation become socially
important. In USA dark skin (Black) was seen as ugly till the 1960s when
change in ideas ofbeauty altered and the concept of 'Black is Beautiful'
emerged. A change in social perspective had brought about a revaluation of
a quality which produced different results.
"I oonceive that there are two kinds of inequality among the human species;
one, which I call natural or physical, because it is established by nature, and
ofthe
consists in a dilference ofage, health, bodily strength, and the qualities
mind or of the soul: and another, which may be called moral or political
inequality, because it depends on a kind ofconvention, and is established, or
l0 at least authorized by the consent of rne".
Thus according to Rousseau, the hrst type of inequality is natural and therefore Concept of Difference
is given; while the second type is socially created and therefore will benefit and Ineqality in Tribal
Context
a few over the majority.
Sociologists point out that natural and moral equality are not completely
ttnn,luted. For example, intelligence is measured by Intelligence Quotient
U0. IQ Test; in the United States have found that Whites on an average
have higher score than Blqcks. Does that mean that Whites are naturally
ruore intelligent than Blacks? Can the income gap between the
communities be explained by the higher intelligence oJ the ltrhite? But
this has been explained by the following facts (l) Intelligence is the
product of both genetic and environmental factors. The social background
of the individual influences his IQ scores. Deprived social backgrounds
will negatively influence the scores (2) Intelligent tests dre not really
objective. They are based on white middle class knowledge and skills (3)
The tests only measure only part of the mental cdpacities of the individuuls
and therefore are not universally valid.
Dipankar Gupta points out that "differences in language, religion, race or sex
are differences that are in themselves and, do not contain the property of
inequality. This may not however, be the popular understanding of these
differences." (Gupta, 1996: 9). He says that 'though differences cannot be
placed in a hierarchical order they are not allowed to retain their horizontal
statuses'. "They usually tend to get hierarchised in popular consciousness.
This is where prejudice takes over. Men are deemed to be superior to women,
certain linguistic groups are held to be less civilized and cultivated than others,
and religious bigotry prevails, all because most ofus are not conditioned to
tolerate difference qua difference. " (Gupta, 2004 : 120 - 12 I).
Some ofthe groups which are discriminated because oftheir nanral differences
are:
Apart from the fact that men are generally physically stronger than women,
there is no biological evidence to show that women are incapable ofdoing the
tasks that men do. Yet it is often held that men are better suited to manage
outside work while women are better suited to do household rvork and care
for their children. ll
Tribal Identity and
Ethnicifv-I
2. Racial differences
It is not only academic knowledge that is aflected by these biases and partisan
attitude. Common people's everyday experiences with members of other
communities colour and reinforce these biases and then they become established
as facts. These everyday experiences take placein common places- like in
the street, workplace, markets, educational institutions, during political
activities. People do not consciously give much importance to these interactions
but nevertheless are influenced by them. It is not often understood that it is
pre-existing biases in the observer that influenced his perception and his
conclusions has merely reinforced his bias.
Tribal and non{ribal interactions takes place in rural as well as urban area.
In rural area, a number of studies have shown that the tribal experience has
been largely negative. It has increased tribal alienation and, caused frustration t3
Tribal ldentity and
EthniciS-I and anger among them. Raja Kanti Das (Das in Pfeflfer, Georg and Deepak
Kumar Behera, 1997) str-rdied of Oraons in Midnapore showed that the Oraons
were adopting certain elements ol Hinduism from their neighbours as an
adaptive measure while striving for maintaining their identity and community
organizations. But inspite ofthese steps, the Oraons were losing theirjobs to
the new migrants to the town. P K Bhomick (Bowmick in pfeffer, Georg and
Deepak Kumar Behera, 1997pp 109-115) study ofthe 2l Lodha villages in
the Midnapore show that frustration is driving them towards crime. There
have been a number of studies that show how tribes have been brought into
the Hindu fold by incorporating tribals' Gods into the Hindu pantheon. The
assimilation, if successful, rnakes the tribe a caste within the caste system. The
study of Pattanaik (Pattnaik in Pfleffer, Georg and Deepak Kumar Behera,
1997 pp317 -329) of Sabara tribe in Orissa shows their gradual adoption of
Hindu customs and becoming an untouchable caste. Local power equations
play an important role in determining the ritual status and position ofthe caste.
Historically such tribes are placed in the lower positions in the caste hierarchy
though they have been instances oftribes being accepted as Kshatriyas.
Christian methods to convert tribes have been more direct and involve a
break frorn their earlier animistic beliefs. Both these process have often resulted
in the loss of tribal identity. While in many cases the assimilation into larger
community might have given the tribal community greater security, in many
cases it has caused violent conflicts between the tribes and non-tribes and
between tribes itself. There have been instances of forceful rejection of Hindu
and Christian beliefs and a retum to traditional beliefs.
In urban areas, the nature of contact between the tribal and non-tribal has
been different because ofthe relative anonymrty prevailing in the cifies. However
we see here too people's perception about tribal has negatively influenced
the interaction pattems. Stereotypes about tribes are found in the language,
representations and nature of interactions of every day situations.
6. North eastern nxen and women are often not recruited for jobs that
have public profile- hotel flanagement; modeling and airlines are
some examples. A lack of "Indian Looks" is cited as the reason.
Dovai, Nikita(2009: 80)
The examples that are found in every day sittrations reflect the nature of
tribal and non tribal interaction in civil societv.
B6teille, Andre, 1983, The ldea of Natural Inequality and Other Essays,
Ox lord Universiry Press. Delhi
16
/
ft
I Oommen, T.K. (2004), Nation, civil society and Social Movemeits,
Essays in Political Sociologt, Sage publications, Delhi.
Concept of DilTerence
and Ineqality in Tlibal
Context
a Turner, Bryan (1986)
t'7
UNIT 2 ETHNIC RELATION, CONFLICT
AND CHANGE
Structure
2.0 Objectives
2.1 Introduction
2.2. The concep of Ethnicity
2.0 OBJECTTVES
After studying the unit you should be able to:
o know about the concept of ethnicity;
o understand the dynamics ofethnic relations; and
o discuss the causes ofethnic conflicts in tribal areas.
2.I INTRODUCTION
The concept 'Ethnicity' is often used in relation to tribal problems and
the tribal
siftlation. Conflicts between tribes and non-tribes are explained by saying
that
they are ethnic problems. It is therefore very necessary that the meaniig of
ethnicity and its applications be understood. Then we wirl apply it to the tJbal
situation in India and draw insights from ii.
Some times the word is used in a derogatory sense_ it is as if the
tribes have
remained backward in their thinking and remained strongly attached to
their
prirnordial ties while the others have moved on ro becomeiodem Indians and
even global citizens. Thus, according to this view, the lack ofrnodem consciousness
has left the tribes backward and there lies the main cause for tribal problems.
People of the so called mainstream often shake their heads and blame
the tribes
when they hear about violence in tribal dominated area.
to
Tribal Identitv and
Ethnicity-l t1 ETHNIC RELATIONS IN INDIA: TRIBAL
CONTEXT
Milton Yinger (i997) gives a framework to understand ethnicity and its impacr
on society. He says that there are at least four major types of multiethnic societies
in the contemporary world:
These models are typologies and no society can completely fit the model. But
these typologies help us to understand that ethnic relations are not only about
cultural differences but there are factors like power, outside orientation that influence
the ethnic relations.
There are two broad possibilities which take place when two or more ethnic
communities live in proximity.
2. Dissimilation a process
whereby intra societal differences are maintained
and created around sub-cultural groups.
Assimilation and Dissimilation are continuous processes. They are reversible also.
There are rare cases of complete assimilation and complete dissimilation. Often
after assimilation there exist traces ofthe commrurity's earlier social and cultural
pracdces.
Yinger gives twenty variables that affect the extent and speed of assimilation of
an ethnic group which means that the presence or absence ofthese variables will
increase or reduce the rate of assimilation and dissimilation.
These variables are useful in understanding the tribal relation with others in India.
However, some of the variables are not relevant (Point 4, i0' 1G 18 and 20).
These points are more relevant for an immigrant society like USA than India
lndian tribes are, in majority of the cases, the older, ifnot the oldest cornmunities
ofa place. Some tribes have been forcibly displaced either for forced labour or
due to developmental projects; in which case the tribes have been uprooted from
ttreir original dwelling places.
Horowitz (1998) has given us ten explanations which more or less coverc all the
theoretical perceptive on ethnic conflicts:
8. According to some theorists, erite interests are the cause for ethnic
conflicts.
The 'elite entrepreneurs' make use oftheir ethnic affiliations
and cause ethnic
conflicts to serve their political and economic interests.
10' Ethnic conflicts are based on the need ror suwival ofttre groups.
The soridarity
the groups develop helps the group to cooperate with other members.
it
helps the groups to survive and at times the struggle for
survival leads to
conflict. These conflicts help the better organized to suruive at the cost
of
others.
\'lichael Brown (1997) reviews the various causes identified for ethnic conflicts.
t I ) Systemic explanations which identifies close proximiqr, weak regional, national
and international authorities and the lack ofsecurity as major reasors. Communities
are often caught in a 'lsecurity dilemma" when they resort to mobilization and
conflict (2) Domestic explanations which identifies the causes as lack ofeffectiveness
of the state in addressing the demands of the communities, the impact ofnationalism
on inter-ethnic relations, and the impact of democratization, and (3) Perpehral
explanations that focus on false history that communities have about themselves
and others.
CheckYour Progress II
Note: Use the space provided for your answer.
1 ) Describe any one ofthe explanations for ethnic conflict.
However this is not a clear classification, as the situation on the ground is complex.
Often the conflicting parties involve an overl or covert alliance between two or
more parties against others. The alliances are between tribes and non tribes or
between tribes. It is also alleged that state agencies are also covertly aiding one
group against others. ln other situations it is the actions ofthe non-fibal commrmity
that have pushed tribes into conflict.
A. The major issues of tribal and non tribal conflict have treen
i) Land issues
Tribes in India have come in contact with odtsiders tkoughout history However
it was during the colonial period that the contact became common resulting in
several conflicts Tribal land has been often communally owned rather than
individually owned. However under the colonial law land had to be owned
indMdually. Tribal land was alienated and unforhrnately the process has continued
even after lndia became independent. 23
Tribal Identity and
Ethnicitv-I
ii) Settling of Outsiders on Tribal Land
Outsiders (Non tribes) have increasingly settled in tribal areas. The main reasons
for this are the following (i) tribal land is rich in natural resources (ii) Mining and
development activities have increased j ob opportunities (iii) increase population
and pressure on land, and (iv) the perception that tribes are gullible and can be
exploited.
In many states like Jharkhand and Tripura the tribes have become a minority
because ofthe influx of migrants. Outsiders have gained enough political and
social power to marginalize the tribes. This has built up resentment and hatred in
the tribes towards the outsiders. The Outsiders called the dr'hzs in the local dialect
is seen by the tribes as the main cause for their impoverishment and their
problems. Myron Weiner in Sons of the Soil, Migration and Ethnic Conflict
in India gives us an idea of tribal perception of the tribal themselves on the
outsiders. They feel that the outsiders are not part of their community and are
exploiting them.
There have been numerous attempts to deal with the problem ofoutsiders. One
of the major demands of the Assam movement was to identify the foreigners and
prevent them from becoming citizens illegally. However these measures have not
been successful because of the problems in identifling foreigners (Frontline
November 6 1992).
The development projects might have helped the nation to progress, but it has
been at the cost of the tribes. The tribal populations were asked to move from
the native lands for greater common good but they never benefitted.
Amita Baviskar (1995) asserts that the conflict between the state and.the tribes
are not only a right to livelihood but is also a clash of cultures. A culture which
sees land and environment as assets to be exploited for development and the
hibal culture that has leamt to live with nature harmoniouslv.
24
\.) The Rise of Modern Nation States of India, pakistan and Bangladesh Ethnic Relation, Conflict
and Change
India, Pakistan and Bangladesh are three nation states bom ofBritish
India. The
division ofcolonial India into two countries was based on the criterion ofreligion-
rhe Muslim majority regions became pakistan. In 1971, pakistan
itself was divided
and a new nation emerged - Bangladesh.
The boundaries ofthese nations have divided many ettxric communities and placed
them'nder different nation states. Members ofthese communities feel strongly
that all their members should live together under one nation state. For
example
the Nagas are forurd in rndia and Buma. one of the demands of Naga
separatists
is that all Nagas unite'nder one state. Similar demands have been
made bv other
separatists groups also.
The hibal areas have been exploited as they are rich in natural resources. However,
the tribal people and the regions remain backward. According to the planning
Commission over 80 percent of the total workers, both rural and urban, are
engaged in primary sector, ofwhom 45 percent are cultivators and 37 percent
are agricultural labourers. The corresponding figures for all workers are 31.65
percent cultivators and 45 percent agriculhual labourers. This indicates that STs
are essentially dependent on agriculture. They have not largely benefited from the
gro$'th ofthe service secror especially the banking and IT sectors.
Similarly the incidence of poverty in STs is 45.3 percent in rural areas and 24.1
percent in urban areas compared to the figres of25.4 percent and 13.7 percent
for total population (Tribal Committee Upon, 2014). The Human Development
Index for STs is estimated at 0.270 which is lower than HDI of SCs and general
population. Similarly the Hutran Poverty Index is estimated at 47.79 which are
higher than the SCs and general population (UNDp, India, 2007).
Government negotiations with one group are often seen as betrayal by the
other groups and often the agreements are not accepted. Often clashes
befween groups takes place which costs lives. Various factions of NSCN
fought over NSCN (IM) peace talks with the govemment (Frontline Jtty 30,
r993).
However, the plurality of militant groups has not prevented many of them from
cooperating with each other on common issues (Frontline September 9 1994).
Tripura All Tripura Tiger Force (ATTF) is an example of the same.
xii) The Role of the Ruling Parties in Centre and National Level Politics
The National parties in the Centre have not been free from blame. Often the
govemments in the Centre have used their power to further their parfy interests
at the cost of creating instability in the States. Elected goverffnents are destabilized
and puppet leaders installed (Frontline, March 22, 1996).It is not uncommon
to find that the leaders of tribal dominated parties switching sides after a change
of power in the Centre. These unpopular changes have made the central
govemment lose legitimacy in tribal dominated states.
Govemments both at the state and central level have made shortsighted policy
decisions that have hurt the people ofthese states especially the tribes. Since
tribal voices are not adequately represented in the decision making bodies many
ofthese decisions have affected them adversely.
In Kerala - Large scale migrations have taken place from mainly central Kerala
to the districts of Waynad and Idukki. Many of the migrants have settled down
illegally on forest land. The number ofsuch migrants has now become large and
has become a powerful pressure group. Their major demand is that they be
given land rights. All major political parties support these demands. This has led
to clashes between the tribes and the settlers, who are backed by the police.
In 2003, the govemment decided to grant land rights to the seftlers in Wa1,nad.
It led to clashes between the tribes and the settlers and subsequently between
the tribes and police which left many dead.
ln 1975, the Kerala Legislature had unanimously enacted the Kerala Scheduled
Tribes (Restriction of Transfer of Lands and Restoration of Alienated Lands)
Act. The Legislations primary purpose is to restore alienated land to the tribes.
However, it was not notified till 1982 and tribes could not benefit from the
legislation. In 1982 the various ru1es under the Act was formulated and notified.
However the law was not implemented on the ground. A public litigation was
filed in the Kerala High Court in 1988. Again only three of the 8088 cases
t]
Tribal Identitv and were fina1ly restored and only 1201 case orders were passed. The High Coun
Ethnicitv-I
in 1993 ordered the govemment to dispose all pending cases within six months.
Again the govemment was not willing to act. The tribal land issue remains
unresolved.
The State govemments in these states have had limited success in combating
the naxal problem. In Chhattisgarh, an organization called Salwa Judum has
been formed by a Member of Legislative Assembly (MLA) with the support of
the State govemment. It consists of volunteers (often paid as Special
Police Offrcers) mainly from tribal communities who are trained in guerrilla
warfare and then used against the Maoist. The strategy of using armed
civilians against Maoists has been criticized as delegating state responsibility to
private organization. More importantly, from the tribal community point of
view the Salwa Judum has divided communities and even families. Often
membem of the same comrnunities are pitted against each other. The resultant
violence has left many dead and many more displaced. Independent
observers have stated that the violence has had a negative impact on the
commrmities.
It is notjust the material deprivation that has caused conflicts between the tribal
and non-tribes. Often the mainstream culture identifies the national culhue with
their own culture values and liflestyles. Other cultures are sidelined or even
discriminated. In the national level the twice-bom Hindus inhabiting the Indo-
Gangetic plain, the mainstream, look upon the emergence ofperipheral cultural
nationalism with disapproval and disdain. (Oommen, T.K. 1986)
At the State level too, there are deliberate attempts to sideline the culture ofthe
minoriq/ linguistic groups. It often finds expression in the language policy and the
education policy of the State. Education and Langtage policy are emotional
issues and people are easily provoked. The division ofAssam into the smaller
states was in response to the demanJs that the culture of the non Assamese
28
Tribal communities was under threat.
Cultural Insensitivity is also seen when tribes are expected to move away fiom Ethnic Relation, Confl ict
their traditional lands for often inadequate compensation and even more andChange
importantly without understanding the role of the natre and their surrounding in
their culture. Amita Baviskar (1995) points out that for the tribal community the
land was central to their cultrue and it was difficult to imagine their lives without
the landscape.
Tribal religion was often anirnist and nature worship. But many have converted
to Christianity and many have been Hinduised. Some tribes have converted
to Islam. These new identities have often changed the tribal perception of
themselves and others. Conversion to Christianity has enabled greater access
to education and greater awareness about their situation. For example, the
many founders of Jharkhand movement were Christians. Their education and
exposure gave them the ability to articulate the demands of their communities
effectively.
The cultural alienation and lack of development in tribal areas has produced
numerous separatist and secessionist movements. Demands for a separate
Statehood and sometimes, a separate Nation, have been made by various tribal
groups. Nagaland , Meghayala, Maoram, Tripura, Arunchal Pradesh in the North
East, Jharkhand and Chattisgarh are states which have been formed to address
the demands of tribal movements.
The longest separatist movement is the Naga movement. In 1926, the Naga
Club submitted a memorandum to British demanding sovereignty. Nagaland
National Council QIINC) under the leadership ofAngami Zapn Phizo staned an
insurgency and demanded a sovereign Naga state. The Council held a
'referendum' in which it claimed that 99 per cent of the Naga people supported
independence for Nagaland. Phizo created an underground govemment called
the Naga Federal Govemment (NFG) and a Naga Federal Army (NFA). After
Phizo, the NSCN has split on tribal line into many factions- NSCN (Isaac-
Muviah) and NSCN (Khaplang). Negotiations with the Indian government are
held periodically to resolve the problems.
29
'Iribal ldenti\' and
l.lthnicity-I
B. Tribal Conflicts - An Overview
Tribes have engaged in major conflicts that have taken place between the tribes
and non tribes and between tribal communities themselves.
Some of the ethnic conflicts that have taken place in the North-East are:
3. Naga-Kuki clashes,
The two tribes Nagas and Kukis share common territory mainly in parts of
Manipur and Nagaland. A long struggle has taken place behveen the groups for
the control of these areas. The Kuki groups are demanding that the Kuki
dominated areas of Churachandpur, Senapati, Chandel and Tamenglong to be
recognized as Kuki land. This demand has been opposed by the major Naga
militant group, The National Socialist Council of Nagaland NSCN (lM). The
Kukis militant groups include the Kuki National Army (KNA). The conflict
escalated in 1992 when Kril<i militants asked the Nagas to leave Moreh, a town
near the Indo-Myanmar boundary. Moreh is a known center for smuggling and
distribution of heroin which comes in from Myanmar. Kuki militant groups control
the trade and have made major profits. The NSCN demanded .taxes' which
the Kuki group refused. They then demanded that Kuki leave these areas. The
clashes between the Naga-Kuki left numerous dead and many more displaced
(Frontlitn . Jnrttrurl l. 1993.1
Bodos are one of the largest tribes living in the plains of Assam. They dominate
the Kokrajhar and Bongaigoan districts. The Bodos are demanding a state for
themselves which will be craved out of Assam. The All Bodo Student Union
(ABSW) and later the National Democratic Front of Bodoland lead the agitation.
The agitation for Bodoland was starled in 1987 and became increasingly virulent
in 1988 and 1989. An accord known as the 'Bodo Accord' was signed in
February 1993, and the Bodo Volunteer Force (BVF), the armed wing of the
ABSU, laid down arms, paving the way for the establishment of the Bodoland
Autonomous Council (BAC). However, one section of the BVF rejected the
Accord and formed the Bodo Liberation Tiger Force (BLIF) (now known as
Bodo Liberation Tigers (BLI)) in 1996. This organisation remained active in the
disficts of Kokrijhar, Bongaigaon, Nalbari, Barpeta, Goalpara, Kamrup, Darrang
and Dhemaji until its cease-fire agreement with the lndian govemment on March
29,2000. But even the accord could not be implemented. The territory under
the BAC could not be demarcated and its powers clearly defined (Frontline
January 26, 1996).
30
Ethnic Relation, Conllict
Tripura Bengali Clashes and Assamese Bengali Clashes
and Change
,ligration liom North India and Bengal was constantly taking place. But after
he creation of Bangladesh the problem became very acute. Bangladesh has
after it became a separate nation. Economic
'een facing numerous cases
problems, frequent disasters and ethnic conflicts have made life difficult for the
people. There are large scale n-tigrations from the border areas ofBangladesh
to the North-East especially Assam and Tripura.
Modem India is rightly proud ofthe economic and technology progress it has
made after lndependence and especially in the last two decades' However the
condition of tribes is a blot on the record oflndia. Seeing the problem of tribes
as being purely an economic or administrative one is missing the point and
solutions from this point of view are not likely to succeed. The problem has
culhual and social dimensions. The govemment of India has acknowledged the
problem and is working out different ways to address the issues.
Brown, Michael (1997) in Guiberman, Montsenat and John Rex, The Ethnicity
Reader, Nationalism, Multiculflralism and Migration. Polity press, Cambridge.
Comell, Stephen Ellicott and Douglas Hartmann (2007), Ethnicity and race:
making identities in a changing world, Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of Sage
Publication, Newbury Park.
Deb, Bimal(ed) (2006) Ethnic issues, secularism and conflict resolution in North
East, concept publishing house, New Delhi.
Intemet sites
vR.Krishna,Date:1710612003uw:http://www.thehindu.com/2003106117/stoies/
2003061700061000.hfin
Weiner, Myron, 1978. Sons of the Soil, Migrations and Ethnic Conflict in India
Princeton, Princeton University Press.
32
UII{IT 3 TRIBAL IDENTITY IN THE
MODERN WORLD
Structure
3.0 Objectives
3.1 Introduction
3.0 OBJECTIVES
After studying the unit you should be able to:
o know what are identities and its relevance;
o know the difference between identity formation in the modem world and
traditional world;
o know the issues important for tribal identity; and
r understand the consequences of tribal identity,
3.1 INTRODUCTION
In simple words, identity is how we see ourselves and the social environment
around us. It determines how we look at important events in our life, how we
attach meaning to them and how we react to then.
I) Levels of ldentity
A. Individual Identity
Individual identity emerges out ofthe unique experiences that the individual
has in her life and her response to it. Individual identity is the product ofboth.
how an individual views himself and how he is viewed by others. Individual
experiences are unique and consequently individual identity is also unique.
That is why social workers remind themselves often that every client is rurique.
Ilowever, human beings are social by nature. They live in groups and
communities and not in isolation from each other. This condition requires that
individuals cooperate and share with one another. The level ofdependence of
the human beings especially at their young age is very high. They are taught
to be members of communities and this lifeJong process is called socialization.
Hence, both these aspects are important for the individual ideniity; the unique
aspects ofthe person and those aspects that are common with others in the
community. Thus, individual identity differentiates an individual from others as
well as integrates to others.
Eriksson, the psychoanalyst who made seminal contribution towards
understanding the concept described identity as "a subjective sense as well as
an observable quality of personal sameness and continuity, paired with some
belief in the sameness and continuity of some shared world image". Eriksson
saw childhood and adolescence as period which is crucial to the formation of
the individual's identity. It is during this period that the identity foms through
incorporation ofspecific objects ofidentification and subsequent mastering of
tasks in later life (Rex, ibid). Thus, the basic world view is formed in the early
stage of an individual's life, after which the individual that seeks further
understanding of the world through that world view.
B. Community identity
Individual identity and group identity are int'luer.rced by their community identity.
Corrmunity values and culture play an important role ir.r detennining group's
values and belief. It is the community at higher level (nation or ethnic group)
that deterrnine upto a large extent the value orientation of the family.
At the community level, history has an important role to play in the formation
of identities. It is a form of collective memory. Collective memory is the
34 foundation of self identity. In pre-modern societies, history was recorded irr
Tribal Identity irl the
fie form of m1ths, folklore and songs which were ffansmitted from generation ModernWorld
ro generation through the word of mouth. Modern societies have written
histories and often claimed that to be scientific and objective. Nevertheless
history writing, in al1 forms, is to vary degrees, an exercise in selective and
partisan understanding of the past. It is very much what and how people or
the elite want to remember about themselves and what they want to forget.
Bhargava (1999; 5) says that "to have an identiry is to recognize the presence
of something stable in the midst of change and diversity. It is to be located
somewhere, to possess a tangible sense of being at home in the world. More
unportantly, this sense of being anchored obtains from identifoing with something
else that, on the face of it, appears different, but is as same as me".
Even seemingly permanent identity may change when other identity is adopted
or forced to other community. Caste membership is by birth but there have
been numerous instances where castes Sanslritized fot upward mobility At
times these attempts were successfui. 35
Tribal ldentity and
Ethnicify-I Similarly there has been fusion and fission taking place
in the caste systerr
leading to caste groups attaining new statues. Maiielbaum (
1998; 500_516)
gives numerous instances where separate
"o_i
"urr", usuallyiakes
subsequently are seen as one caste. The fusion ofcastes
,";;**;
place
in democratic societies to increase caste membership
and improve bargaining
power with the state.
v) Multiple Identities
Another importa t aspect of identity is that every individual
has multiple
identities. The reason is that an individual is a member
of many communities
each of which describe in one particular way. Sometimes
multipli memberships
can create tension in the person if the value orientations
of the communities
are contradictory. For example. belonging to an
atheistic political party and
having religious beliels may cause tension in the individuai.
It may not be so,
if he is a marginal member in both or one of these comrnunities.
There are latent and manifest identities. Manifest identities
are open and the
individual is conscious about those ide'tities. Latent identities
are unknown to
the individual or may not be given much significa:rce.
In some situations, these
latent identities emerge. For example, Indians who go
abroad suddenly have
an intense feeling of,Indianess, which they felt in
Ind]a. Hence, the
and significance of identities are situationai. "n,..g.n..
vi) Identifiers and Markers
Identity tends to crystallize around symbols or cues (Horowi
tz; 1975; 120).
They can be external and/or internal markers. Markers
are symbols and
values which distinguish communities from one other
They can be extemal
and tangible; body, dress, language, worship systems.
It can be intemal and
intangible. beliefs. values, erc.
36
Tribal Identity in the
3.3 TRIBAL IDENTITY CRISES AND THE Modern World
MODERN WORLD
\lodem industrial communities differ significantly from primitive and simple
communities. Emile Durkheim distinguishes them by the type of solidarif that
erists in these societies. Mechanical solidmity based on similarity of all menrbers
rs found in primitive and simple societies whereas organic solidariry based on
interdependence is found in complex industrial societies. He envisaged a
breakdown in norms when society undergoes rapid changes from one society
to another. The result is anomie which leads to an increase deviant behavior
Lncluding suicides and crimes. Another well known sociologist Weber described
the modern world as characterized by the emergence of the rationality in
different spheres oflife. He did appreciate the positive aspects of rationality
but also wamed that it would lead to an end of imagination. He feared the
decline of the supematural and the end of imagination. He described the
modern rational world as being 'iron clad'.
Herbert Blumer (1964;129) points that there are five different ways in which
a traditional society can respond to modemization: (1) Rejective response-a
traditional society may reject the process of modemization and stnve to maintain
traditional order. (2) Disjunctive response-this Rpe ofresponse is characterized
by the persistence of traditional and modern elements without any open
conflict. There are in some spheres of community life where modem elements
prevail and there are other areas where traditionai values and practices prevail.
(3) Assimilative response-this response consist of an absorption of
modernization process by the traditional society without major changes in
social order. (4) Supportive response-the society accepts the modem values
and it increases the power of traditional social order, and (5) Disruptive
response-the tradition order is challenged and destabilized at various points
by the response.
We understand the tribal commrnities' reaction to the changes in the last two
centuries with certain limitations. Firstly, there is a great diversity in the tribal
communities. Social, economic and cultural characteristics differ from
community to communiff and consequently changes affect tribal comrnunities
in diflerent ways. Secondly, identities are dynamic and changing. Thirdly,
perceptions on tribal identity differ widely depending on the location of the
observer and that leads to contradictory observations.
The new legal system, enforced by the administration also dislodged the
traditional legal system of the tribes. The main effect ofthese steps were on
property rights, especially land rights. Traditionally, tribal land was communally
owned and there u'as no concept ofindividual property rights: a foundational
principle ofmodem legal system. Consequently, no official documents exist to
record property rights. Tribal lands were easily alienated to the govemment
and to non-tribes and many ofthem became landless. Furer-Haimendorf ( 19g2:
321) writes, "....in the streets of Ranchi one can still see Munda and Oraon
rickshaw-pullers who not long ago were independent cultivators tilling their
own land".
The modem legal system had negative impact on the farnily relationships also.
Traditionally, the women had an important role in the economic activities of
the family. After the tribes lost their common land the role of women lost its
significance and with it, her status declined. The tribal women became
dependent on the male and this adversely changed the equal status she
previously enjoyed.(For a detailed discussions see the section on v)omen
in PfeJ.fer, George and Deepak Kumar Behera 1997, Contemporary
societies; tribal Studies, Volume One, Struchffe and process,. ppll S-206).
The econornic system of the tribes was adversely affected when common
property resources especially the forests were put under control of the
govemment. Again the colonial law was that all land not privately owned was
government land. The British looked at the forest and common lands as
resources that had to be managed and exploited for commercial purposes.
British forestry policies was inherited by the Government of Independent
India and implemented towards the service of the State's primary goals of
repaid industrialization. The National Forest policy 1952 underlies continuity
of the colonial policy. It reinforced the claim of the state to exclusive control
over forest protection and production. Significantly, this policy identifies shifting
cultivation as one ofthe main threats to State forestry to be dependent on
forest resources. While there were some changes in the post Indian forest
38 policy later on, the overall impact has been very much the same. Therefore
Ttibal Identity in the
iribal alienation from forest and common propefiy resources has increased ModernWorld
not decreased.
The factor which most adversely affected the tribal was the development
induced displacement (DID). It is estimated that around 20 million people
have been affected due to the DIDs out of which 40 percent are tribes.
(Tribes constitute only 8 percent of India's population). Programmes to
rehabilitate the <lisplaced have been less than satisfactory. As per the
information readily available, a population of 21.3 million have been displaced
between 1951 and 1990 in the states of Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Gujarat,
Maharastra, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Orissa Of whom, 8.54 million
(40 per cent) are tribals and ofthose only 2.12 million (24.8 per cent) tribes
could be resettled, so far. Even those settled though rehabilitation programmes
are not ful1y integrated into the new situation.
It is not the state alone that has altered the conditions for th.e tribes; it is also
the civil society. The relations between non-tribal and tribal communities are
to be seen in the superior- subordinate relationship Being poor in resources
to cope with the "modern world", the tribes are forced to accept subordinate
positions in the society. In rural areas, they are landless labourers and in
urban areas they became unskilled labourers. Educational backwardness and
limited access to resources results in inability to cope with the situations.
These factors make them vulnerable to exploitation and alienation.
Tribal relationship with the forests is not entirely supernattrral. Many ofthe
food items and energy sources are obtained from the forests.
The new political leadership was different from the traditional leaders. The
traditional tribal leaders acquired their legitimacy from religious sources. Often
traditional leaders got their direction for political actions from spirits and gods
while the new leaders knew modem forms of political activity. They were
aware of need for democratic and representative govemance- elections, voting
and party system. They understood the importance of advocating tribal
demands and getting concessions from the government to help tribal
communities.(Troisi in Rao, 2000;33 8-364).
Christian principles often differed with kibal beliefs and value systems. They
discouraged the widespread beliefs of tribes in witchcraft and black magic.
The tribal youth hostels were looked upon as sinful and evil. The church and
the priests became the centre of Christian tribal life. In this way Christian
belief replaced traditional beliefs.
Tribals have always been in contact with Hindu civilization. In fact, Ghurye,
a prominent sociologist called Indian tribes "backward Hindus". Others have
disputed this contention by pointing out that there are significant differences
between the Hindus and the tribal religions. It is difficult to determine this
issue conclusively beoause of the following reasons: (1) Hindu religion does
not have any set of criteria to determine an individual's membership into the
40 religion. There is no common ritual, prayers or belief system which all Hindus
Tribal Identit] in the
:,lhere to, (2) it does not have any church or an ummah whose membership Modern World
:an identify the individual as a member ofa pafiicular religious groups, and
3) the diversity in tribal religions makes the process of identif ing individual
rrbes who are significantly Hinduized and who are not, exfemely difficult'
\ Iutually influencing interaction befi'veen the fibes and Llindu cjvilization existed
trom early times. Historians say that Indian civilization is itself a product of a
series of accretion of tribes at different times. Beteille (2004; 7 l -72) quotes
D.D Kosambi who says that "The entire course of lndian history shows tribal
elements being fused into the general society' This phenomenon, which lies at
the foundation ofthe most striking Indian feature, namely caste, is aiso great
basic fact of ancient Indian history". A known example of the hansformation
of a tribe into a caste is the Ahoms of Assam who were originally from
outside India and after a length oltime become a fully integrated caste group
within the Hindu caste system. Similarly, the Khasi regarded as a tribe has
certain Hindu features.
The process got accelerated with the colonial period with greater movement
ofpeople around the country. Increased contact lead to increased intetaction
between tribes and Hindus. changes were observed in many tnbal communities.
The Todas of Nilgiris Hills in TamilNadu is an example. They are substantially
influenced by the Dravidian Hinduism which immigrants from other parts of
South India have brought with them. Pictorial representations of Hindu gods
and goddesses have found an honourable place in many Toda households
However, there has not always been a decline in their indigenous tribal rituals.
Both the ritual systems are practiced with fervor and enthusiasm' Walker
(1936: 288) says that the Todas has accepted the "efficacy of two parallel
ritual systems: his own and that ofpopular South Indian Hinduism"'
Unlike Christianity, Hinduism did not demand that the tdbes completely stop
their former worship practices. The tribal Gods and worship systems were
integrated in to the Hindu belief systems at the local level The tribes were
given a position in the caste system which often was low and ifthey wanted
io improve the status they had to Sankritize- they had to adopt the values,
beliefs, lifestyles of the dominant community. The dominant caste was most
often a twice born caste- Brahmin, Kshatriya or Vaishya' They had to stop
eating beefand pork - both of which were sources ofritual pollution' Women
were stopped from doing work outside the house and restriction put on their
movements.
41
a-
The Indian state that replaced the British colonial state was a liberal, democratic
and modem state. One of the main tasks of the state was nation building- the
political leaders felt that loyalties ofpeople were predominantly with their
own community and not to the nation state. In order to make a nation it is
important that terminal loyalties of its citizens lie in the nation state. At the
same time it was realized that a large number of people experienced inequality
and discrimination because they belonged to certain groups- Schedule Castes
and Schedule Tribes. Ending the discrimination and integrating communities
into the mainstream was seen as important goal for independent India.
The British administered the largely tribal areas by designating them as "Partially
excluded Areas" and "Excluded Areas" which meant less of British
administration and more of self governance. When the British exited lrom
India the pdncely states were given option whether to join the Indian Union
or the newly created state ofPakistan or remain Independent. Princely states
depending on their population and tenitorial position were integrated with the
Indian Union.
Many tribal secessionist claim that the option to remain independent was
available to them and tribai leaders had opted out to remain independent. But
these claims are not recognized by the Indian Government. Rebellions by
tribes have been dealt with the help of armed forces. The Indian govemment's
response to tribal demands for increased self governance has been to in the
following ways: (1) Create new states when feasible within the Indian federal
system. However not all demands for statehood has been accepted by the
Centre, (2) Create autonomous councils with limited powers within the existing
states. The plain tribes of Assarn Bodo have got a Bodo Autonomous Council
which govems the Bodo dominated areas, and (3) the extension ofPanchayat
Raj System to tribal areas (PESA) with additional powers and responsibilities.
The aim ofthese structures is to satisfy demands for greater control of resources
and protecting their unique life sty1e.
............
B. K. Roy Burman identifies the following parameters as the causes for tribal
unrest:
The situation is also dynamic. The society and the tribal population are
undergoing numerous changes consciouSly or unconsciously. Thus the problem
of identity is related to social and cultural change. It is different type of
modemity which has to emerge in the tribal communities. In democratic societies
these problems cannot be resolved through autho(itarian means and
parlicipatory ways have to be found to resolve these issues. Social workers
are deeply engaged in the society and its different processes. 45
Tribal ldentity and
Ethnicity-I 3.6 FURTHER READINGS AND REFERENCES
Baruah, Sanjib (2003) Confronting Constructionism: Ending India's Naga War
Journal of Peace Research (International Peace Research Institute, Olso,
Norway) Vol 40 (3) May 2003, pp. 321-338.
Baviskar, Amita(2004) 5th priflt, In the belly of the river, Oxford University
Publications, New Delhi.
Dattaray, B.(1989), Tribal identity and tension in North East India, Omsons
Publications. New Delhi.
Oommen , T.K. (2004), Nation, civil society and Social Movements, essays
in political sociology, Sage Publications, New Delhi.
46
Tribal ldentity in the
Rao, M.S.A (ed)(2000), Social Movements in lndia, Manohar Publications, Modern World.
New Delhi.
Sharma, S.L. and T.K.Oommen (2000), Nation and National Identity. Orient
Longman, New Delhi.
47
UNIT 4 STRUCTURAL CONFLICT IN
SECTORS OF TRIBAL
DEVELOPMENT
Structure
4.0 Objectives
4.1 Introduction
4.2 The Concept of Development-A Brief Note
4.3 Structural Constraints for Development
4.4 Tribal Experience with Mainstream Development
4.5 Let Us Sum Up
4.6 Further Readings and References
4,0 OBJECTIVES
After studying the unit you should be able:
4.I INTRODUCTION
The concept of development is seen dilferently by different people. For the
common people, development means mainly the improvement in infrastructure
(roads, electricity and water) and increase in commerce and trade. The
economists locus on the increase in Gross Domestic Product and the per
capita income. Sociologists explain development as the increased use of
rationality and specialized division of labour. Political scientists refer to
development as attaining a high level of stability and order in the political
system. Thus, we can say that development is a multidimensional concept.
In the period immediately after the Second World War, the concept of
development was nearly unanimously accepted by the global community as
progressive and necessary. Political leaders and intellectuals explored strategies
to achieve a higher stage of development. The world itself was divided into
two groups- developed and underdeveloped llater on called developing)
countries. Many problems ofthe developing countries iike ethnic conflict.
political instabiliry poverty and population were seen as a direct effect oflack
of development. It was felt that it is only through development that these
problems could be resolved.
The dominant opinion in India was also quite similar- development was seen
as the keyto answering the numerous problems ofpost colonial India.
Since most institutions in India weie weak it was the State that had to lead
48
the efforts to develop the nation. Thus, state lead development became the Structural Conllict in
Sectors of Tribal
focus of the Indian political leadership. Development
Ilowever, in the case ofthe tribes, it was recognised that a different approach
to development had to be taken. The socio-economic profile ofthe tribes was
very different from that of the general population. At the same time it was also
felt that the "the fi'uits of development" could not be denied to them. The
Pancheel advocated by Jawaharlal Nehru and Verrier Elwin was an attempt
to balance between the need to preserve tribal way of life and the dght of the
tribes to develop. The experience oftribal development in post- colonial
lndia should be studied rvith this back ground in mind.
But soon it was discovered that economic progress and development did not
go hand in hand. Economic development did not always lead into social
development. Time and again, only elites of the society benefited from the
development process. The second major challenge to the idea of development
was that it was not ecological sustainable. Modem theories of development
increased humankind's power over nature and subsequently 1ed to its ecological
degradation and exploitation. Nature is a finite source and cannot survive
prolonged decrease of its resources. Therefore, development process should
take into consideration the limited resources of nature. The World Commission
on Environment and Development's definition is "development that meets the
E needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to
E meet their own needs." Sustainable Development implies economic growth
c together with the protection of environmental resources.
t
f Another set of critics of development see a relationship between development
D and underdevelopment. According to these critics notably Andre Gunder Franl<
I and Samir Amin, development and underdevelopment are sides of the same
L coin- one leading to another. In the capitalist system, the gror.vth of the
developed countries is based on the continued erploitation of the
f underdeveloped countries. They pointed out that rhe developing countries
s have remained colonies providing for the raw materials for the developed
s countries in a neo imperialist regime.
D
I
Tribal Identity and include longevity, knowledge, freedom, security, ability to participate in
Ethniciry-I
govemance and human rights. People cannot be reduced to a single dimension
as an economic creature. (UNDP 1990).
The concept ofdevelopment has broadened its scope from being an exclusively
an economic characteristic to more holistic one which includes social and
political dimensions. However, there are significant numbers ofcritics ofthe
very concept of development itself. These critics want to rejecl the concept
ol development in totality while those mentioned above only advocate major
changes in the way we look at development. Development for these critics
is a flawed concept from the beginning and no amount ofchanges will make
it viable and useful. Major criticisms are the following: (1) the concept of
development is Eurocentric and ignores the cultural specificities of other
societies. It is homogenizing as it aims to make the whole world similar to the
westem society and thereby destroying the indigenous cultures of the lesser
developed societies. Diversity and pluralism, a precious heritage of humankind
is destroyed in the process. (2) It is elite driven with little role for participation
of the people. (3) It is capital intensive and technology dependent. (4) It is
not ecologically sustainable as its philosophically assumptions is based on
maximum exploitation of the natural resources. (5) It is state centred
development and increases the power ofthe state vis-i-vis the people, and
(6) It results in violence against the poor and dispossessed which is justified
in the name of development. Development induced displacement is an example
of this violence.
I
l ribd ldentifv and
Flthnicifv-I fundamentally important to school success (Bourdieu & Passeron 1979). Thtts
he asserted that "habits and dispositions" are a resource which individuals cart
convert to "profits". Just like ltnancial resources they are potentially subject
to monopolization by individuals and groups; and, under appropriate conditior.rs,
they are transmitted from one generation to the next generation.
iii ) Political Constraints
The state has emerged as an important agent of development in the modern
society. This is especially true of developing societies where economic and
social backwards persist. The state with enormous financial and technical
resources is a major factor in the developrnent.
The numbers of tribal political leaders have been few in number. In the higher
bureaucracy also the representation is not propodionate to their population.
The Pariiamentary Standing Committee on Welfare of Scheduled Castes and
Sche(\\e( Tr\bes s!a(e( (hat as s( t Ianuery 20Q5 , the overrl\ \s$sserrtetiorr
in Groups A, B, C and D posts in the government of India services among
the STs was 4.3 per cent. 4.5per cent, 6.5 per cent and 6.9 per cent
respectively.
Tribal movements for new states in tribal dominated area aims at gaining
greater control over resources that can be used lor development. The North
eastern states were created by the centre after strong demands by various
tribal communities. However, the central govemment has been slow in accepting
similar demands from tribes of central India till recently. Chhattisgarh and
Jharkhand were created to address the demand for tribal communities for
greater political controls. At the local level, the Panchayat Extension in Schedule
Areas (PESA) with greater control over resources ofthe area is implemented
so that tribal communities have a greater control over land, water and other
common property resources.
The major barriers which prevent tribes from attaining a higher level of
development can be identihed by studying their socio-economic profile. Firstly,
urban areas are engines of growth in the modern society. The share of the
Scheduled Tribe population ln urban areas is only 2.8 percent. A vast majority
of tribes are unable to avail the opportunities which are emerging in urban
sector. Secondly, most tribes are in occupations related to agriculture.
52
A large number of tribes are cultivators. According to Planning Commision, Structural Contlict in
45 per cent were cfltivators and 37 per cent were agricultural labourers. Sectors of Tribal
Development
Thus, about 78 per cent of the main workers from these communities were
engaged in primary sector activities. Tribal representation in the secondary
and tertiary sectors is restricted to around 28 per cent.
Even in the agricultural sector tribal communities are not beneficiaries of the
Green Revolution. Their holdings are small and mostly in dry lands. The 70th
Round further showed that, at the all-India level, despite the handicaps the
average area owned by a tribal household was 0.650 hectares and that owned
by non-tribal household is 0.563 hectares. The percentage of landless
householG among tribes was somewhat higher than among the non-tribes, the
respective figlres being 20.5 per cent and 16.3 per cent. The percentage of
ribal marginal households was less than the non-tribal marginal households,
that is respectively 40.6 per cent and 51.7 per cent.
Tribes as whole were unable to benefit from land reforms- The Dhebar
Commission (1961) observed that the schemes of land reforms were based
upon land lords-tenant system and the tribal areas did not customarily have
such a practice on a significant scale. The total quantum of land declared
surplus in the entire country was 73.36lakh acres out of which aborfi 64.97
lakh acres have been taken possession ofby Government and 54.03 lakh
acres have been distributed to 57 .46lakh beneficiaries of whom l5% beiong
to Scheduled Tribes, the number of ST beneficiaries being 8.30 lakhs
Tribal land has been alienated on a large scale. The Dhebar Commission
(1961) had gone into the circumstances leading to tribal land alienation. Some
of their observations regarding reasons for land alienation are as follows: (i)
ignorance oftriba.l peirple;(ii) lacunae in the laws (iii) utilization ofthe machinery
of the courts before which the tribal is more or less powerless; (iv) voluntary
surrenders engineered by lardlords taking advantage ofthe tribals' ignorance;
(v) lack of adequate knowledge of conditions in tribal areas on the part ofthe
authorities; (vi) complicated legislation; and (vii) lack of sources of credit as
al alternative to the money-lenders' usury.
Large Multipurpose Societies (LAMPS) and tribal cooperatives were created
by the central government to enable tribal communities to access credit and
assisting in marketing of products. However, the efforts were of limited success.
The rate ofrecovery ofloans given *'as very poor. Most of the people who
took loans used it for consumption purposes. Tribal Cooperative Marketing
Development Federation (TRIFED) was staned !o ensure fair economic price
;br the produce grown/collected by the tribes and to check their exploitation
b1'the r-ested interests. It developed a nelwork for collection, processing and
marketing of forest and agricultural commodities of tribes. Here too the efforts
were only of limited success. A diagnostic study ofthe organization identified
the following causes:
While the general picture of tribes in gainful activity is dismal, there are
number of tribal entrepreneurs emerging. Sachchinanda (Sachchinanda in
Saksena and othen (2006)) describes how a combination of education, political
power, central firnds and outside exposure changed the socio-economic profile
of tribal communities in Arunachal Pradesh.
I
Tribal Identity and approach has been the key to the success of the organization. Similar.ly,
Ethnicity-I
another organization working in tribes in Orissa follows the participatory
approach in the building sustainable housing and sanitation facilities. Instead
ofgiving grants to the selected families to build houses and toilets the NGO
involves all the families in the village. People luve to conffibute to the common
fund and then contribute their labour to make their houses. The NGO gives
technical and limited economic assistance. The locally available materials are
used for the building and locals know how it is used to the maximum. All
these processes make the programme participatory and cost-effective
compared to govemment housing scheme.
In case of tribal communities, the process has not been that of only the
inability to adapt. The colonial state and the post independent state policies
have contributed towards the marginalization and oppression ofthe tribes.
56 The realization ha's occurred in govemment and non-government sector that
conditions' t*ffi*:lH#
failed to ameliorate their
welfare and development approach has
Urrt"rrtt..oot"ausesofoppressareaddressedthesituationwillnotimprove'Development
an important part in
have played
Unforhmately, govemment laws and polices
the oppressive sYstem.
57