JIMMA UNIVERSITY

FACTORS THAT AFFECT THE LEVEL OF PRIVATE INVESTMENT: IN

CASE OF JIMMA ZONE
BY:

HABTAMU DERSO

ADVSIOR: SISAY TOLLA. ( MSc)

A REASEARCH PAPER SUBMITED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS IN

PARTIAL FULLFILMENT OF THE REQUERMENT FOR B.A DEGREE IN
ECONOMICS

COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS

DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

JUNE 2017

JIMMA, ETHIOPIA

1
 Acknowledgment
First and for most I am grateful to the God who deserves all the glory for giving me the strength
,support and help to start my research work. Secondly, I would like to express my deepest
appreciation to my advisor, Mr. SisayTolla for his fruitful guidance, encouragement and
constructive comments. My special thanks also go to all who has helped me in typing and editing
the research paper. Last but not least, I would like to thanks all my dorm members for their
assistance in terms of ideas and materials.

I
Abstract
Ethiopia has great potential for private investment sector because of its favorable conditions. Its
fertile land, minerals, forest resources, different climatic conditions, water resources and human
resources are some of the factors that makes Ethiopia desirable for private investment, despite
these resources there are very few private investment activities in the country taking Jimma zone
as one part of oromia region there are poor private investment activities even though the same
favorable conditions exit as the general country. The study intended to identify the major causes
for low private investment in Jimma zone of Oromia region, and there consequences on the
overall economic development of the zone. For this purpose, data was collected from primary
and secondary sources. Primary data was obtained from investment office of Jimma zone officers
and leaders, and people being engaged in different private investment in the zone. Secondary
data was taken from investment office of the zone, and different publications. The research also
underlined the private investment activity is very limited and there are different social and
economic problems resulted due to limited level of private investment such as, poor standardized
of living, high unemployment, and general economic stagnation of the zone. Finally, the study
concluded that the low level of private investment activities has negatively affected the level of
economic growth of the zone.

II
 TABLE OF CONTENTS
Acknowledgment ............................................................................................................ I
Abstract.......................................................................................................................... II
Acronyms ...................................................................................................................... IV
List of tables................................................................................................................... V
List of Figures ............................................................................................................... VI
CHAPTER ONE ............................................................................................................. 1
1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 1
Background of the study .................................................................................................. 1
Statement of the problem ................................................................................................. 2
1.3 Objective of the study ................................................................................................ 3
1.3.1General objective of the study.................................................................................. 3
1.3.2Specific objective of the study ................................................................................. 3
Research Question ........................................................................................................... 4
scope of the study ............................................................................................................ 4
Significance of the study ................................................................................................. 4
Limitation of the study .................................................................................................... 4
1.8 Organization of the study........................................................................................... 5
CHAPTER TWO ............................................................................................................ 6
LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................................ 6
2.1Theoretical literature .................................................................................................. 6
Definition ........................................................................................................................ 6
2.1.2 Types of investment................................................................................................ 8
2.1.3 Determinants of investment .................................................................................. 10
2.2 Empirical literature .................................................................................................. 12
CHAPTER THREE ....................................................................................................... 14
3. METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................... 14

III
 Source of data ............................................................................................................... 14
Method of data collection .............................................................................................. 14
3.1SamplingTechnique .................................................................................................. 15
Method of data analysis ................................................................................................. 16
CHAPTER FOUR ......................................................................................................... 17
4.Results and Discussion ............................................................................................... 17
4.1 demographic characteristics ..................................................................................... 19
4.1.1 Educational states of respondents .......................................................................... 19
4.1.2 Effect / Impact of education on privet investment activity ..................................... 20
4.1.3 Attitude of investors towards investment activity .................................................. 21
4.1.4 Responses of domestic interest rate ....................................................................... 21
4.2 problems and investment climate ............................................................................. 22
4.2.1 Economical problem ............................................................................................. 23
4.2.2 Social problems .................................................................................................... 24
4.2.3 Market problems ................................................................................................... 24
4.2.4 Infrastructure problems ......................................................................................... 25
4.3 capacities of investors to invest................................................................................ 26
4.4 incentives given to investors by government bodies ................................................. 27
4.5 Investment promotional activities done by the government bodies to attract new investors.
...................................................................................................................................... 27
CHAPTER FIVE........................................................................................................... 30
5. Conclusions and Recommendation ............................................................................ 30
5.1 conclusions .............................................................................................................. 30
5.2 Recommendation ..................................................................................................... 32
References..................................................................................................................... 34
Appendix ...................................................................................................................... 35
Questioners ................................................................................................................... 36
DECLARATION .......................................................................................................... 39

IV
ABREVATION
GDP Gross Domestic Product

LDC Least Developing Countries

WB World Bank

V
List of tables
Table 1: Distribution of sect oral private investment in the jimma zone 2013/2014 17

Table 2: The number of investors who got investment permissions, capital invested, and job
opportunities created in each year of the last five years in the zone 18

Table 3: participation of investors by citizenship 18

Table 4: Sex responses of investors 19

Table 5: Impact of education on private investment activity 20

Table 6: Attitude of investors towards private investment activity 21

Table 7: Response of interest rate 22

Table 8: Response of respondents in private investment problem and climate 23

Table 9: Response of the problems of infrastructural facilities 26

Table 10: Responses of the capacity of investors 26

Table 11: Number of respondents who have no capacity to invest more and plan to continue their
business 27

Table 12: Amount of incentives delivered to investors by government bodies 27

Table 13: Investment promotional activities done by the government bodies 28

Table 14: the main causes of low level of private investment in the zone 28

VI
List of Figures
Figure 1: Educational status of investors 19

Figure 2: Response of investors towards domestic interest rate 22

Figure 3: Investors responses to the problem they face during their engagement 23

Figure 4: Share of respondent who utilize their capacity fully 27

VII
 CHAPTER ONE

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the study

Now a day investment is the main basis for economic growth and development countries in the
world. Many countries adopt policies which help to the expansion of investment that is taken to
bring changes to the economy and eradicate poverty (World Bank, 2006).

An investment refers to the purchase of several of goods and services that can be used for
productions of other goods. Developed countries have excess capacity to invest. Investment
whether domestic or foreign is an essential activity for sustainablegrowth. Investment can
increase the productivity capacity of the economy. Most developed countries are encouraging
private investment in order to run or facilitate their economic growth and employment
opportunities.

Private investment plays a significant role in the world that is increases employment opportunity
raises the level of output increase export to international market, increase the level of per capita
income, andreducepoverty and raise urbanization. In general it fasters economic development in
the world (encyclopedia book, 1994)

Investment is a crucial variable, which uses to accumulate capital and increases specialization of
market efficiency. In general to the least developed countries regulate a policy that gives a palace
for either private and public investment or foreign investment. However adopting and regulating
policies about investment is not enough. Creating a smooth area of investment and encouraging
and supporting private investors is required. This is necessary both to raise consumption level
and to permit government of Ethiopia have adopted various development strategies to encourage
both the individual farmers and commercial investors.

Investment is the main hope of most poor countries as Ethiopia to increase the level of income,
because it is essential to increase the living standard of the people. Currently the federal and
regional governments of Ethiopia devote much of their efforts an accelerating the growth of
investment and diversification, because it is important to increase the level of output and

1
employment opportunities. However in Ethiopia the gap between investment and saving are wide
due to low level of income and domestic saving.

Private investment in Ethiopia has great attention because change of different political regimes
with different economic policies. The most significant time relation to investment from imperial
regime of Haileselassie and Derge regime were the participation of private investment was
limited by the state. However, in the context of significance change in fiscal monetary trade and
industrial policies are needed for review of the continued public sector in wide range of activities
cues felt (Annual report of the Ethiopian economy, 2000).

A new strategy for encouraging private sectors was adopted when the transitional government of
Ethiopia comes to power in 1991.since 1991 enhance the role of private investment in the
development presses , various policy measures have been established and revised several times.
This revised investment code with the objective of eliminating, discriminating against the privet
investment and creating conductive environment for them.

According to investment office, there is a lot of investment potential in the city such as, mineral,
manufacturing, health, education, tourism etc. part of this strategies the services delivery system
of banks and the government should pay due attention diversifying financial institutions, which
render credit and other related services. This because the institutions play an important role in
enhancing privet investment which in turn results in an increase in national income with the
government has been aiming at.

1.2 Statement of the problem

Investment has a paramount importance in the process of bringing rapid economic development
of nation. Most developing countries are going to private investment to run or facilitate their
economic growth. Private investment is one of the main determinants for growth and
development of nation. However, less developed countries are characterized by low level of
saving.

The low level of domestic saving leads to low level of investment. The problem of wide resource
gap in many LDC’s, including Ethiopia; make them depend on foreign saving to finance their
domestic investment. While Ethiopia in endowed with sustainably natural and human resources

2
its economy predominantly agrarian. The rapid growing population of the country contributed
very less towards the economy by causing excessive pressure on foreland. Agriculture being the
bone of the country economy, contributes the lion’s share of the GDP, employment t and export
earning of the country. However it is vulnerable to frequent drought and natural disasters.
Because of the weak linkage between different sectors of the economy, there has been a great
problem in the agricultural sector in providing enough raw materials, machinery and spare parts.

As Jimma zone is one part of Ethiopia, the problem of private investment activities is the same.
It is tied up with many problem among them,in adequacy of infrastructure, small market size and
low demand is worth to conceder beyond these many physical, social and economic problem are
retiring the private investment no to reach its peak.

The prospect to assign the leading role of the structural change of the country to the private
sector could not be realized in the presence of these constraints. Therefore, this study addressed
to the most influential factor that affect private investment in the zone.

1.3 Objective of the study

1.3.1General objective of the study

The general objective of this study is to analysis the major factors that affect private investment
in the Jimma Zone

1.3.2 Specific objective of the study

1. To examine the economic and social factors that affects private investment in the
Zone.
2. To assess the general attitude of investors and the government towards private
investment activities in the Zone.
3. To give recommendation about the factors.

3
1.4 Research Questions

This study would answer the following question

1. What are the major factors that affect privet investment in the Zone?
2. What is the general attitude of the people, investors and the government towards private
investment?
1.5 Scope of the study
As indicated in the objective, the aim of this study was focused on the main factors that affect
level of privet investment in the study area.In order to identifythe variables the survey
conducting in the Zone by using questioners. Based on the investors licensed, stratified random
sampling technique was employed and 57 investors selected from the total population. All
private investment activities (agriculture, industry and service sector) were included in the study.
1.6 Significance of the study

Private investment is the primary engine to promote any countries economic growth. This study
initiates to explore the factors that affect private investment in the zone. In doing so, I hope that
the study would add knowledge in the area of private investment and it has its own contribution
for future research work. In general, the results of this study may benefit potential researchers,
policy makers, planners redesigning appropriate policies and strategies. The study expected that
it has a benefit to the public in general and potential investors in particular.

1.7 Limitation of the study

Although the study has same significance, it has its own limitation, these are፦

i. Resource limitations, which includes, money and materials.

ii. Shortage of time given for data collection was very short.
iii. Some of the selected respondents were not interested to give any full responses.
iv. Health problem of the researcher.

4
 1.8 Organization of the study

The study is organized as follows፦

in the first chapter there is the introduction part which contain background of the study,
statement of the problem, objective of the study, scope of the study, significance of the study as
well as limitation of the study were presented. In chapter two review of literature with its
theoretical and empirical parts presented. In chapter three methodology of the study were also
presented. In chapter four the result and discussion is presented and at last chapter five contains
conclusion and recommendation.

5
 CHAPTER TWO

LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1Theoretical literature

2.1.1 Definition

For many years investment has been raised and be defined in different ways by different authors
but with the same concept. The term investment can have more than one meaning. In economics
it refers the purchase of a physical asset such as, a firm’s acquisition of plant, equipment or
inventory or an individual purchase of any home, which are used in the further production of
goods and services. However for a lower the word dents purchase of an asset for storing value
and hopefully increasing that value over time.(Herbert B. Mayo, 1997.pp.6)

Fredrick Ambling and William G.Forms, 1994 also define as, “The purchase of an asset that will
provide income or further capital growth or both.”

Gateman(1997) defines investment as sizable outlays of funds that commit a firm to some course
of action, the firm lies on specific procedures to analyze andselect that investment policy.

Investment is the use of money to earn income. The term also refers, to the expediter of funds for
capital goods such, factors, farm equipment, livestock and machinery capital goods are used to
produce other goods or service (encyclopedia book, 1994)

Hulbert (1997) has defined investment has a fix and initialoperating resources used for the
production of goods, the provision of service and the development of science and technology
capability. He also advise investors that when he/she evaluate investment he/she should invest
internally (within its activity)before considering external investment(investing outside its
activity) before starting an investment activity, an investor must know and analyze in what area
he/she is going to invest, the availability of funds he/she has for investment, the economic and

6
political situation of the country, availability of raw materials for running its activity and fully
he/she must put standard of evaluating the profitability of the investment. The complexity and
difficulties of choice in process of analysis and evaluating investment that ability of manager and
decision maker arise much due to the existence of different kinds of with different
nature(Alexander, 1993) distinguish in to፦

1. Real investment generally involves some kinds of tangible asset such as land, machinery,
or factories.
2. Financial investment involves contracts written on pieces of paper, such as common
stock and bonds.

In primitive economics most investment is of the real variety however, in a modern economy,
much investment is a financial variety. Largely the two forms of investment are complementary,
not competitive.

A. Keynesian Model of Investment

The theory of investment behavior goes back to Keynes (1936) general theory he was the first to
call attention to the existence of an independent investment. Decision function in the economy.

He observed that investment depends on the prospective managerial efficiency of capital relative
to some interest rate that is relative of opportunity cost of the invested funds. So that investment
can be increased either by managerial efficiency of capital or by reducing interest rate. He further
pointed the privet investment was interracially volatile since any rational assessment of the
return on. Investment was bound to the highly uncertain. The annual sprit of the privet investors
would be the main driving force in investment decision, in addition expectation of future demand
for firm output, velocity of investment, uncertainty and another non-economicreadable i.e.
political social and economic variables are possible determents of privet investment in general.

B. Accelerator model of Investment

After Keenness the evaluation of investment was linked to simple growth model. This model
gives rise to the accelerator, popular in 1990s and early 1960s and widely used even today in
practical growth exercise. The accelerator growth theory makesinvestment a line or proportion of

7
chance in output. It extremely simplicity explains its popularity; given all incremental output
ratios. It is easy to compute the investment requirement associated with a given target for output
growth. Perfect completion and exogenously determine output. The theory also
disregardsdynamicexpectation with regard to further price, interstate and capital cost.

C.Neo Classical Investment Theory

The restrictive assumption behind the accelerator model theory led Jorgenson(1971) and Hail
Jorgenson (1971) to formulate the neoclassical approach. In this approach, the desired capital
stock depends on the level of output and the user cost of capital (which in turn depends on the
price of capital goods, real interest rate and the depreciation rate). This theory indicates the fact
that firm will invest as arental cost capital falls down but as output in the economy goes up. In
addition, firms would like to have more capital stock when they expect higher level of output.
Logs in decision making and delivery create a gap between the current and desired capital stock,
giving rise loan investment equation. I.e. an equation or the change in capital stock.

The foundation of this approach have are inconsistent; that the assumption of static expectation
about future price output, and interest rate is inappropriate. Since involvement is essentially of
forward looking progress, and that the legs in delivery are introduced in labor manner
(serven&solimano, 1992)

In economics, there are three types of investment spending; business fixed investment,
residential investment and inventory investment (Mankiw, 1992 pp 463-82)

2.1.2 Types of investment

1. Business fixed investment

Thus include the equipment and stricter that business by to use in production. The largest price
of investment spending, accounting for about three quarters of the total is business fixed
investment. The term business means that thus investment goods are bought by firms for use in
future production. The term fixed means that this spending is for capital that will stay put for a
whole, as opposed to inventory investment, which will be used or sold shortly later. Business
fixed investment includes everything from fix machines to factories, computers to company cars.

8
The standard model of business fixed investment is called in the neoclassical model of
investment. The neoclassical model examines the benefits and costs of firms owning capital
goods. The mode shows how the level of investment the addition of stock of capital is related to
the marginal product of capital, the interest rate and the tax rules affecting firms.

2. Residential Investments

Residential Investment includes the purchase of new housing both by people who plan to live in
themselves and by land lords who plan to rent it to others.

The stock equilibrium and the flow supply

There are two parts to the model first: the market for the existing stock of houses determines the
equilibrium housing price, second, the housing price determinants the flow of residential
investment .This model of residential investment is similar to the theory of business fixed
investment. According to this model of the housing market, residential investment depends on
the relative price of housing. The relative price of housing, in turn, depend on the demand for the
housing, which depend on the imputed rent the individual expect to receive from there housing.
Hence, the relative price of housing plays much the same rule for residential investment as Tobin
s q does for business fixed investment.

Changes in housing demand

When the demand for housing shifts the equilibrium price of housing changes and this change in
turn affects residential investment. The demand curve for housing can shift for various reasons.
An economic boom raises national income and the demand for housing. A large increase in
population perhaps of immigration, also raises the demand for housing. One important
determinant of housing demand is real interest rate. Many people takes loans mortgage to buy
their homes. The interest rate is the cost of the loan. A reduction in the interest rate raises
housing demand, housing prices and residential investment.

3. Inventory Investment

Inventory investment the goods that business put aside in storage is at the same time negligible
and the great significance. It is one of the smallest components of spending averaging about one

9
present of GDP. Yet its remarkable volatility makes it central to the study of economic
fluctuations. In recessions, firms stop replenishing their inventory as goods are sold and
inventory becomes negative. In typical recession, more than have the fall in spending from a
decline inventory investment. Higher output raises the stock of inventories firms to hold,
stimulating inventory investment.

Reasons for holding inventories

Firms have various motives for holding inventories of goods. Smooth production using them as a
factor of production, avoiding stock outs and storing work in process, one model of inventory
investment that works well without endorsing a particular motive is the accelerator model.
According to this model the stock of inventories depends on the level of GDP and inventory
investment depends on the change in GDP.

Inventories and interest rate

Like other components of investment, inventory investment depends on the real interest rate.
When the real interest rate raises holding inventories become more costly so rational firms try to
reduce their stock. Therefore, an increase in real interest rate depresses inventory investment.
Thus the real interest rate measures the opportunity cost of holding inventories.

2.1.3 Determinants of investment

Interest rate

The level of planned investment depends on the market interest rate, because in order to invest
individual must either borrower or uses its own funds (Branson, 1989).

All types of investment spending are inversely related to the real interest rate. Higher interest rate
raises cost of capital to firms that invest in plant and in equipment raises the cost of borrowing to
home buyers and raises the cost of holding inventories (Mankiw, 1992)

10
National income

This also another measure influence on investment is believed to be the change in national
income .low level of income causes low demand for capital and low level of saving. This too
again cause low level of investment leading to low level of output which inter brings low level of
income i.e. vicious circle low level of income (Claran andPaul,19990)

Financing constraints

Sometimes faces financing constraints limits on the amount they can raise in financial market.
Financing constraints can prevent from under taking profitable investment. When a firm is
unable to rise funds in financial market, the amount it can spend on new capital goods is limited
to determine their investment based on their current cash flow rather than expected portability
(Mannkiw, 1992)

The stock market and Tobin’s q

Many economics see a link between fluctuations in investment and fluctuations in stock market.
Stock prices tend to be high, when firms have many opportunities for profitable investment,
since these profit opportunity mean higher future income for the households. Thus, stock price
reflect the incentives to invest(Mankiwe, 1992). The NobelPrizewinner economist James Tobin
proposed that firms base their investment decisions on the following ratio, which is known called
Tobin’s q.

Tobin reasoned that net investment should depend on withier of greater or less than one. If q is
greater than one, then the stock market value installed capital at more than its replacement cost.
In this case, managers can raise the market value of their firms stock by buying more capital.
Conversely, if q is less than one the stock market values capital at less than its replacement cost.
In this case, managers will not replace as it wears out.

11
2.2 Empirical literature

A World Bank report (1991) indicated that there is a positive relationship between higher level
of privet investment and higher GDP growth rate for developing countries. This report also
should that countries that have kept low inflation, low interest rate and allowed sufficient credit
to the privet sector have been likely to high level of privet investment as share of GDP. The
report added that macroeconomic stability increase confidence, there by faster privet investment.

Buffy (1986) and Branson (1986) noted that areal depreciation increase the real cost of new
capital goods, relative to domestic goods, depressing investment in non-tradable activities. In the
tradable good sector the cost of new capital goods relative to the price of output falls and
investment rises. The result for aggregated investment is uncertain. Preferment and
Madarssay(1993) studied the determinants of privet investment in developing countries. They
classified the determinants of privet investment in to positive, negative and uncertain factors.
The study should that budget deficit is one of macroeconomic determinants that affect privet
investment negatively. This is because when there is budget deficit government tried to find
different means of financing the deficit line that borrowing from local banks, international
institutions and monetary expansion. However, each of this form of financing the deficit has
negative effect on privet investment when government finances deficit from local banks it will
depress privet investment by extracting most financial resources from the source and allocate
towards government budget financing. Hence it will reduce credit availability to the privet
investors more over if the government tries to finance the budget deficit by printing money. It
leads to inflation and affect privet investment negatively. Along with the above variables extra
indebtedness, volatility of inflation and exchange rate are classified as certain factors i.e. their
effect cannot be predetermined.

Oshikya (1994) studied macroeconomic determinants of privet investment in Africa using a

sample of seven countries to the period 1970-1988. The result tends to confirm that increase in
real output (GDP) growth rate how positive impact on privet investment. Particularly for low

12
income countries. On the other hand, the effect to the real exchange rate is negative, small and
insignificant in low income countries. The study also showed that inflation rate has a strong
negative impact on private investment in low income countries. In contrast, the impact of
domestic inflation rate on private investment behavior in middle income countries is positive.

The study adds domestic credit availability to the private sector is a major determinant of private
investment for both middle income and lower income countries. However, the effect of change in
terms of trade on private investment for both groups of countries is positive.

Evgene R, Black (1995) showed that there are vitally important advantages to be gained in
developing countries. Above all, in the private sector there is the possibility of calling for the
individual, energies that cannot be effectively gained by public fiat. It is also true that when there
is a variety of initiatives and decentralization of efforts, economic life has breath and stability it
would otherwiselack. Farther more such a situation freedom. The study added that the
economical future of every developing country wishing to maintain a democratic tradition
depends on importantly and often vitality up on the growth of a health and vigorous private
sector capital.

Green and Villanueva (1991) examined the effect of various macroeconomic variables on the
private investment activity. The study confirmed the restrictive monetary and credit policies
includes in stabilization packages affects investment activities by rising real cost of bank credit
and by raising interest rate they increase the opportunity cost of retained earnings. Both
mechanisms raise the user cost of capital and leads to reduction in investment. In addition, the
study found that the rate of privet investment is positively related to the real GDP growth, the
rate of public investment and negatively related to real interest rate, domestic inflation, the debt
service ratio and the ratio of debt to GDP. The study under lined the importance of examined the
interaction among investment, saving and growth in general equilibrium model. Akplau (1997)
researched on determinants of private investment in Ghana. He found that in the end private
investment in Ghana on real GDP, real interest rate, public investment and the availability of
credit, positively affected by private investment, while increase public investment has negative
impact on private investment.

13
 CHAPTER THREE

3. METHODOLOGY

3.1 Source of data

The study was used both primary and secondary data for its successfully accomplishment.
Primary data are information gathered by the researcher himself and were collected for the first
time. Hence the study needed such information from the selected investors involved in the zone
and from investment office of the zone. Secondary data is also obtained from personal, public
documents and related to the case. In general, investors and the investment office of the zone
were the main source of primary and secondary data relatively concerning the private investment
activity of the zone.

3.2 Method of data collection

For this study, sample survey was used to collect the required information. Sample is chosen
because it can save time and money, and it can provide accurate information if it is carefully
selected. Regarding to primary data collection method the study used questioner to obtain
information from the investors in the zone that is included in the sample. The form of questioners
developed in both open-end (to get different information from different respondents) and close-
ended (to get uniform answer). Beside, to obtain primary data from investment office of the
zone, the so-called personal interview method of the data collection was employed.

In the second data collection analysis was made in different document of the private investment
sector, besides the various reading of literature related the problem of the sectors.

14
3.3 SamplingTechnique

The study population includes all sectors of investment and employee of investment office of the
zone. Accordingly, the total population of investors currently found in the zone with different
business activity is total to 350 investors. Since investors are different in terms of their
experience. Stratified random sampling technique was used for the selection typical sample out
of the total population of investors. To include investors to the sample size from the sector taken
the sample. In line with these 40 investors from service sector, 10 investors from industrial sector
and 7 investors from agricultural sector were included in sample size, which together sump to a
total of 57 sample respondents.

The sample size determination formula,

( )

Confidence level = 90%

Error = 10%

Z=1.64 ( )

( ) ( )( )
n ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( )

n= 56.53

n= 57

N= 350

n= sample size

15
p= probability of success

q= probability of filler

z= level of confidence

N= total population

E= error

p+q=1

p=0.5

q=0.5

3.4 Method of data analysis

After the data was collected properly, the process of editing, classifying, arranging or organizing
the collected data was done. So that it will be suitable for further analysis. After this all had
done, the base for the whole study or research, data analysis was made while is the further
transformation of the processed data to one for possible patterns and relations among data
groups. To this end disruptive form of analysis was extensively employed for the matter of easy
understanding of interpretation. The common form of describing theprocessed data that study
had used in tables, percentages and figures.

16
 CHAPTER FOUR

4. Results and Discussion

Ethiopia started to be ruled by the federalism system of government in the year 1992/93 G.c,
which changed the centrally common socialist economy in to developmental state market
economy. After this time that oromia region established its own government as one among the
nine regions of the country. Besides the regions has established its own investment commission
and recently formed investment offices at zone level. The secondary data obtained from the zone
investment office can be discussed in the following section according to their relation with the
objective of the study.

Table 4.1: distribution of sectored private investment in Jimma zone of September 2016
No Sector No of Land Registered Capital with Job opportunity
project size(hec) capital work permanent temporary Total
A Agriculture 149 19,42.1 444,307,340 296,261,901 1131 6972 8103
1 coffee 98 14,887.9 336,002,107 265,970,116 715 5973 6658
production
2 Oilseed 34 4388 87,509,193 20,476,785 347 900 1247
production
3 Animal 17 148.2 19,796,040 9,815,000 69 129 198
husbandry
B Industry 98 117.49 202,765,300 162,887,823 655 4341 4996

4 Coffee 89 107.1 171,765,140 138,911,351 481 4210 4691

machine
5 Electrical 1 4.05 29,000,000 22,000,000 110 112 222
pole
production
6 Metal 8 6.34 2,000,160 1,976,472 64 19 83
work
C Service 103 24.388 108,772,810 94,962,820 169 270 439

Total 350 19,565.978 754,845,450 554,112,544 1955 11,583 13,538

Source; investment office of Jimma zone, 2016

The above table shows that a total of 350 private investors have secured investment license and
had a total investment capital of 554,112,544 on 350 varies projects those have different states
with a job opportunity of 13,538(permanent,1955) and (temporary,11,583).

17
Regarding to job opportunity of the agriculture sector take the major parts with hiring 8103 and
followed by industry and service sector with hiring a total 4996 and 439 labor respectively.

Consider the table below that reflects the number of prospects who get investment permission in
each year of the last 5 years and other related features.

Table4.2: the number of investors who got investment permissions, capital invested, and job
opportunities created in each year of the last 5 years in the zone.
No Year No of projects Capital Job opportunity
Permanent Temporary Total
1 2005 13 60,426,713 71 27 98
2 2006 17 80,217,003 96 78 174
3 2007 6 10,401,000 59 108 167
4 2008 9 16,966,112 104 62 166
5 2009 14 28,261,000 94 86 180
Source; investment office of Jimma zone.Calculated by the research.

The above table shows that what the zone level of privet investment looks like in the last 5 years
in terms of number of investors, amount of capital and employment opportunity.

Beginning from the year 2005 E.c still 2006 the zone level of private investment was increased
in terms of investors, amount of capital and created of job opportunity. However, on 2007 the
number of investors were decreased by 11 from the preceding year. And also amount of capital
invested and created of job opportunity was decreased.

After 2007 the zone level of privet investment was increased in terms of number of investors,
amount of capital invested and created job opportunity.

Table4.3: participation of investors by citizenship.

No Investors No of Capital Land Job opportunity
projects size(hec) Permanent Temporary Total
1 Domestic 345 392,136,403 17,000.378 1,791 10,183 11,974
investors
2 Foreign 5 161,676,141 2565.6 164 1,400 1,564
investors
3 Joinet - - - - - -
Total 350 554,112,544 19,565.678 1,955 11,583 13,538
Source investment office of Jimmazone, own computation

The above table shows that from the total 350 investors, about 345 investors are domestic
investors, about 5 are foreign investors and none of the investors invest jointly. In terms of
capital invested domestic investors takes the first rank. In terms of job opportunity domestic
investors also the leading. Domestic investors and foreign investors are created job opportunities
for about 11,974 and 1,564 citizens respectively.

18
4.1 demographic characteristics
Table 4.4: sex responses’ of investors

Sex No of respondents Percentage

Male 49 86%
Female 8 14%
Total 57 100%
Source; survey 2017, by the researcher

As it can be seen from the table 49(89%) of the respondents are male and only 8(14%) of the
respondents are females. This shows the majority of investors participating in the zone are male.

4.1.1 Educational states of respondents

The educational background of the investors study elements is believed to be an important factor
for correct decision-making and developing logical attitude in order to evaluate fruitful
investment directions. The educational distribution of the investors or respondents is presented in
the following figure.

Figure4.1 Educational states of investors

35

30

25

20
33
15

10 19

5
5
0 0
illitrate primary school secondary school college &
university

Source; survey 2017 by the researcher

19
The above bar graph indicates that none of the sample size served for the educational status of
the investors are illiterate and 5(8.77%) of the respondents have attended primary school,
19(33.3%) of them are attended secondary school and the graduates of college and university
together consists 33(57.89%) of the respondents.

In a similar manner when these issues of education status raised to workers of investment office
of the Jimma zone, the head of the office has BA degree and the other two works serving as both
the works of the office and the member of the committee have diploma.

As the analysis shows investors have more knowledge than workers of the investment office do.
As indicated in bar graph above most of the investors are attended the college and university
level. In contrast to this the office has both inadequate labor and skilled labor force, which have
adverse effects on the performance of investment activity. (Source; interview 2017 by the
researcher).

4.1.2 Effect / Impact of education on privet investment activity

It is obvious that level of education is very important in day to day activities. It has positive
impact. Accordingly 80.7% of the respondents replied that their education has a positive impact
on their investment activities and 19.3% of the respondents though that their low level of
education has a negative impact on their business activities.

Table 4.5 impact of education on private investment activity

Response No of respondents Percentage
Positive 46 80.7%
Negative 11 19.3%
Total 57 100%
Source; survey 2017 by the researcher

Those respondents, whose education level is justified that education helped them to collect
necessary information for making relatively right decision to evaluate and analyze the business
environment before and after the operation. It also helped them in minimizing or even
eliminating paying high wage for managers as they can act as an owner and manager.

However, respondents with negative to their education level have justified, as their education
level have not enabled them, generally to take the opportunities mentioned above. This means
that they like professional to run their business activities which forces them to incur high extra
cost and so reducing their profit. It also challenges their competence and efficiently as computed
to those well-educated ones.

The implication of the study result indicates that most of the investors have necessary knowledge
with contributes positively to the investment activity. One can also easily predict that education
helps investors to easily learn and develop efficient and effective ways of running the business in
the future.

20
4.1.3 Attitude of investors towards investment activity
The attitude of investors towards investment activity before their involvement in the activity was
mostly medium while that of same was good. However, after involving in the investment
activity, most of the investors or respondents replied that their attitude towards investment
activity is good and for some of them very good. This presented in the table below.

Table 4.6 Attitude of investors towards investment

Time period Attitudes of the respondents
Very good Good Medium Bad
Before investing 5 14 38 0

After investing 25 32 0 0

Source; survey 2017 by the researcher

Sectoral investment structure of the respondents are invest in service sector about 39(68.42%),
invest in industrial sector about 12(21%) and the rest 6(10.54%) of the respondents invest in the
agricultural sector. The respondents have forwarded different rezones for their involvement in
their respective sector of investment. Accordingly, the main reasons for those who are involved
in service sectors are low risk, and existence of fair markets for their outputs relative to other
sectors. Greater return and low risk are the main reasons for these who are involved in the
industrial sectors and low capital requirements are the leading reasons for those who are engaged
in the agricultural sectors.

Besides, for the question that says in which sector do you think investment is difficult relatively?
38(66.66%) 0f the respondents replied that investing in agriculture sector is difficult whereas
about 14(24.56%) of the respondents replied investing in industrial sector is difficult and the rest
about 5(8.77%)of the respondents said service sector is difficult to invest in. the respondents
have their own reason for saying this. For example those respondents who said investing in
agriculture sector are difficult than others. The reason such as it is highly risky, it is natural
dependent (drought) or lake of rainfall and its output is subject to international market of price
fluctuation. In addition those who said investing in industrial sector is difficult, forward reasons
such as, its high establishment of capital requirement, it needs skilled man power for operation of
industrial machineries and also it needs expensive and up to date machineries.

4.1.4 Responses of domestic interest rate

It is obvious that an interest rate is one of the main determinants of investment in every
economy. They have inverse relationship between interest rate and investment. As an interest
rate increases in an economy borrowing is decrease and hence investment decrease and vice
versa. From the information obtained from the sample respondents are given below the table.

21
Table4.7 response of interest rate
No Responses No of respondents Percentage
1 Appropriate 0 0%
2 Not appropriate 46 80.7%
3 Indifferent 11 19.3%
Total 57 100%
Source; survey 2017 by the researcher

Showed in above table no one responded in favor appropriateness of the domestic interest rate.
However, about 80.7% of the respondents replied that the domestic interest rate is not
appropriate since it is so high. The rest 19.3% of the respondents responded domestic interest
rate is indifferent since, they did not deal with financial institutions so far. This means that they
have their own investment equity. This finding can be summarized in the following figure.

Figure4.2 responses of Investors towards domestic interest rate

19.30%

not appropreate
indiffrent

80.70%

Source; survey 2017 by the researcher

4.2 problems and investment climate

To analyze the problem and investment climate of the zone that qualities determine the zone
attractiveness to potential investors and threat issue like social, political, economical, row
materials and other problems were asked from investors. To strength the reliability of the date

22
obtained from privet individuals the same question were raised to investment office of the zone
and replied that the same responses as investors.

Table4.8responses of respondents in the problem of privet investment and climate

No Problem of investment No of respondents Percentage
1 Political 0 0%
2 Social 4 7%
3 Economical 22 38.6%
4 Row material 16 28%
5 Other problems 15 26.3%
Total 57 100%
Source; survey 2017 by the researcher

This table can be summarized in the following bar graph as follows.

Figure 4.3 Investors response to the problem they faced during their engagement.

25

20

15

22
10
15 16
5
4
0 0
Political Social Other Row Economical
problems material

As indicated by the above bar graph Investors have faced social, economical, row material and
other problems. However, none of them faced political problems during their engagement in the
zone.

As the bar graph depicts, there is strong concern regarding the economical and row material
problems mentioned frequently as infrastructure, domestic market and service delivery problem.
In this respect 4(7%) of the respondents strongly beloved that social environment is unfavorable.

Similarly 15(26.3%) of the respondents have other (infrastructure, domestic market and service
delivery) problems. And also 22(38.6%) of the respondents are faces economical problem. While
16(28%) of the respondents also faces row material problems.

23
4.2.1 Economical problem
The economic problem is specified as a shortage of financial capital to operate at full capacity,
this economic problem limits the expansion of the business, the use of modern technologies to
produce quality products and minimizing unit cost of production. This makes difficult to adopt
marketing strategy based on lower price and quality products. In addition the investors respond
that banks ask high collateral in giving loan. From this analysis, I can saw the strong relationship
between economic problem and market problem. Economic problem affects market through
increasing cost of production that is lack of full capacity utilization and poor quality of products
as a financial constraint in suing modern technologies. This financial problem also ahandicap to
investors to obtain information and to provide training program for their worker to increase the
efficiency of workers Thus the study indicates that low purchasing power of the people, poor
quality of domestic products and financial constraints together generalized as marketing and
economic problems which are the factors determine the private investment activity of the zone.

4.2.2 Social problems

The respondents perceived to have social problem identified as the negative attitude of the
society towards the startup of business (investment) due to unwillingness to lose their land. Even
though compensation payments were made and lack of awareness on the benefit of privet
investment. According to the ideas obtained from the investment office for the specific question
raised to determine the general attitude of the people towards investment activity in the zone for
last 10 years. The general attitude of the people towards private investment activity in the
specifies period was indifferent which means neither discouraging nor encouraging this shows
that the society was not well experienced and informed about the importance of private
investment in tackling economic problem. However, recently the office give due attention in
awarding the society about the importance of investment and their role in economic
development.

Another problem that the respondents disclose was that the owners of the land who lose their
land for investment activity does not use properly the compensation made for the land they give
up.

They suggest awareness creation regarding the benefit of private investment related to
minimizing economic problem of the society like unemployment problem and income problem
are essential mechanism and incentive to develop co-operation and co-ordination of the people to
all private investment endeavor.

4.2.3 Market problems

In the case of domestic market problem, most of the issues are related to the general economic
level of the country and policies. The country’s investment policies base its activity on producing
competitive products for both domestic and foreign market. That is the market mechanism
24
determines the price of products. The policy is supplied as a good means or strategy to integrate
the domestic economy with the external economy to efficiently utilize the world resource but it
challenging for domestic investors even computing in domestic market with foreign firms. As to
the views of investors, even though there are substantial domestic markets, the market size was
more important for imported products than local products.

The demand for manufacturing products are as also every small compared with the size of the
population because of the low level of income of the majority of the population.

Beside, low buying capacity, lack of infrastructural development restricts the wide distribution of
the product to explore the existing market opportunities. Lack of awareness on the part of the
consumers the price determine the choice of quality products is also challenges the marketing of
the products. Up to date local and international market information is unavailable at home, and
professional and financial constraints are impending factors for caring out market research and
promotional activities.

4.2.4 Infrastructure problems

The main important input in private investment activity is the level of infrastructural facility of
the area under investigation. Infrastructural facilities imply the availability of roads, electric
power, and water and tell communication etc. therefore, without availability of such facilities,
privet investment activity is unthinkable. Among the sample respondents of the study, about
100% of them replied that they have lack of infrastructural facilities.

Among those who said that we have lack of infrastructural facilities 38(66.66%) of them replied
that they have road infrastructural facilities problem, water supply takes the second strong
concern of investors view in the list of the infrastructural problems that accounts 8(14%) of the
respondents, similarly electric power supply is another treating factor in the zone. However, a
few numbers of respondents responded have a problem of tell communication. These problems
can be summarized in the table below.

Table 4.9 Response of the problems of infrastructural facilities

Response Types of infrastructure No of respondents Percentage

With infrastructural problems Road 38 66.66%
Water 8 14%
Telephone 4 7%
Electricity 7 12.3%
With no infrastructural problem 0 0%
Source: survey 2017 by the researcher

The implication of the study result revealed that, lack of physical infrastructure and its poor
quality is the factors significantly affecting the private investment performance of the zone. This

25
is most probably attributed to the development of public infrastructure development in the
country in general and particularly in the zone specially those backward districts.

4.3 capacities of investors to invest

The responses obtained from investor’s shows that most of them have no utilized their capacity
fully and only very small number of them has replied that they have utilized their capacity.

Table 4.10responses of the capacity of investors

Responses No of respondents Percentage
Utilized their capacity 4 7%
No utilized their capacity 53 93%
Total 57 100%
Source: survey 2017 by the researcher

When we say capacity, it is the ability of investors in terms of capacity, knowledge and other
resource they have. This table can be summarized in the following chart.

Figure 4.4 share of respondents who utilize their capacity fully

7%

Utilized their capacity

fully
no utilized their
capacity fully

93%

Source; survey 2017 by the researcher

The respondents who failed to utilize their capacity fully have out lined different reasons such as
financial constraint, infrastructural problems, lack of technical assessment from the government
bodies and poor implementation of policies.

From the 57 sample respondents 53 of them replied that they have still capacity to invest more
and 4 of them responded that they have no capacity to invest more. Similarly 52(91.23%) of the
26
respondents responded that they have plan to continue and 5(8.77%) of them no intention to
continue their business. This can be shown in the table blow.

Table 11; number of respondents who have no capacity to invest more and plan to continue their
business
Responses No of respondents Percentage
Yes No
Capacity to invest more 53 4 100%
Plan to continue 52 5 100%
Source; survey 2017 by the researcher

As the above table shows the majority of the respondents have planned to continue while only a
few of the respondents have no plan to continue. This implies the most of the investors have
planned to continue their business which seems to have positive relationship with capacity.

That is, if they have access to sufficient financial source and required level of infrastructure, they
can continue their business activities. Plan for future activity can be influenced by other factors
like the accessibility of financial sources, market, political condition and general level of the
economy elements.

4.4 incentives given to investors by government bodies

Regarding to the incentives provided to them by government bodies about 71.9% of the
respondents replied that the incentives given to them is good and the rest 28.1% of the
respondents responded very low. This can be summarized in the following table.

Table 12; Amount of incentive delivered to investors by government bodies.

Incentive given by the government bodies

Low Good
Respondents 16 41
Percentage 28.1% 71.9%
Source; survey 2017 by the researcher

In similar manner, the same question was raised to the official of investment office of the zone.
Accordingly, all of them replied that the incentive given so far was not as such satisfactory but it
is not very low. This show that the incentive that the government bodies are delivering to the
investors are low and hence lack of fair incentives for investors is one of the main obstacle of the
privet investment sector for the zone.

4.5 Investment promotional activities done by the government bodies to

attract new investors.

27
The information obtained from the sample respondents showed that, the activities performed by
the government bodies in attracting new investors is low. This intern reflects that the poor level
of promotion to investment activities in the zone is one of the main factors that are hindering the
privet investment activity in the city as can be summarized by the following table.

Table 13: Investment promotion activities done by the government bodies to attract new
investors.
Investment promotion
Respondents 39 18
Percentage 68.4% 31.6%

Source; survey 2017 by the researcher

For the question that says “do you believe that there is problem of investment activity in the
zone?” all the respondents replied “yes” to this end, they repelled on the ground that despite the
abundant natural resources, suitable water conditions and other opportunities, the level of privet
investment is very low. Beside the respondents forwarded the main causes of the low level of
privet investment in the zone. These are lack of infrastructural facilities, problem related to
preparation delivery and implementation of privet investment land, lack of promotional effects to
attract privet investors. To the zone, lack of good awareness of the government and the society
towards privet investment, lack of sufficient finance of income and lack of incentives and
effective technical assistance from government bodies. This can be summarized in the table
below.

Table14:the main causes of low level of privet investment in the zone.

No The main causes for the low level of investment in the zone No of respondents
1 Lack of infrastructural facilities 57
2 Problems related to preparation delivers and implementation of 46
privet investment land
3 Lack of sufficient finance of income 31
4 Lack of promotion effort to investor to the zone 35
5 Lack of good awareness of the government and the society towards 29
privet investment
6 Lack of incentive and effective technical assistance form 16
government bodies.
Source; survey 2017 by the researcher

For the question that say “are there investors who have applied to the bureau to invest in the
zone, but did not start its operation?” sample responds (the official) said that “yes” the
respondents replied different reasons for the alliance of investors in the operation.

These are lack of sufficient capital, intention to sold land in profit to another person (rent
seeking), management problem, unable to compute with the existing competitors and lack of
appropriate market knowledge.

28
In the zone, still there are areas open for foreign and or privet domestic investors as the
respondents replied. The expected duties are well coming appropriate area (land) and guiding
efficient investors. However, there is a problem of promotional activity in attracting investors to
the zone because of insufficient capital human resource.

Economic theory stats that the level of investment and the level of economic growth have
positive relationships.

In other words, the level of privet investment determines the level of economic growth as the
level of privet investment increases, the level of economic growth increases and vice versa. This
can be measured in terms of the gross domestic product (GDP) = C+I+G+X-M since
GDP=C+I+G+X-M the change in the level of privet investment changes the level of gross
domestic product of an economy.

To this end, all of the respondents recognized the same thing as the general economic theory by
saying that “the more the level of privet investment, the more the level of economic growth of an
economy and vice versa.

29
 CHAPTER FIVE

5. Conclusions and Recommendation

5.1 conclusions

Ethiopia has great potential for the private investment sector, because of its favorable conditions
its fertility of land, mineral, and forest, different climatic divisions and water resources are some
of the factor that make country desirable for investment.

Similarly, Jimma zone is endowed with vast human and natural gift that are potential for the
development of manufacturing, agriculture and services. Besides, vicinities to the central market
are enabling factors for operating private investment activities relatively at low cost in the zone.

As compared to existing opportunities and advantages, the participation of investors in the zone
especially foreign investors are very low. The reason for such performance is due to low capacity
of investment office in attracting foreign investors through promotional works.

In spite of the existence of substantial domestic market, there exist deficiencies demand for some
domestic products due to low poor quality of products, low level of income of the majority of the
people and infrastructural problems.

The economic problem specified is that the shortage of financial capital, which faces investors to
operate at less than full capacity and hinders the use of modern technology to produce quality
products. This makes difficult to adopt marketing strategy based on lower price as well as quality
of the product.

30
The study clearly identified and underlined that the main factor of the low level of private
investment of the zone are lack of infrastructural facilities, problems related to preparation,
delivery, and implementation of investment land, lack of sufficient income or finance, lack of
promotional efforts to attract investors to the zone, lack of awareness of government and the
society towards private investment and lack of incentives and effective technical assistance from
government bodies.

The research also underlined the private investment activity is very limited and there are
different social and economic problems resulted due to limited level of private investment
such as, poor standardized of living ,high unemployment, and general economic stagnation of
the zone.

Finally, the study concluded that the low level of private investment activities has negatively
affected the level of economic growth of the zone.

31
5.2 Recommendation

Investment has come to be widely recognized as a major potential contributor to growth

and development for any country. The relationship between private investment and
growth suggests the need to promote policies of faster the benefits of this connection.
So far the study or the research under that there are some main factors that are affecting
(hindering) the level of private investment of the zone. Hence, in order to spend up the
economic growth of the zone, the problems should be solved appropriately as my role is
concerned would like to forward the following important recommendation in order to
alleviatethe problems.
Infrastructure contributes significantly to economic development by both increasing
productivity and providing amenities that enhance the quality of life. Therefore the
regional and government should deliver the maximum possible effort in improving the
infrastructure facilities in the zone. Besides, there should be involvement of investors in
infrastructural development.
On preparation of private investment land, it should be prepared accordingly to its
suitability for industry and as well as there should be standard bench mark to determine
amount of land suitable for private investment.
On the delivery of private investment land, it should be appropriate compensation or
payments for land owner in advance. In addition, there should be a considerable
awareness and recognition of private investment laws.

32
On the implementation of private investment land, these should be strict supervision and
control on those investors that took land to start operation within the agreement period. If
they did not start operation within the given time, land should be taken away from and
delivered to other potential investors. The capacity of investors should be tested properly
be for delivering privet investment land.
To enhance the financial capacities of investors, the financial institution should be well
developed and strong enough to fill the gap of investors’ problems. Besides, the
collaterals asked by the domestic financial institutions should be fair enough for
investors.
Regarding the promotional activate, a great work (effort) should be done by different
stock holders such as, government bodies, NGOs, investors and the societies as a whole
as to attract domestic and foreign investors to the zone.
Awareness of the government and the society towards the importance of private
investment should be enhancing in well manner. Government should be teaching the
society regarding to the importance of private investment. So the society is familiar with
idea and stop refusing of the new coming investors to the zone. Incentives and technical
assistance garneted by federal, regional and zonal government should be arranged and
applied according to the need of the majority of the investor by making effective and
continuous and discussions with investors.

33
References
 Alexander (1993) fundamental of investment second edition new-Jersey
 Annual report of the Ethiopian economy (2000/2001)
 Branson (1998), macroeconomics theory and policy third edition Harper and raw
publisher, New York
 Fredric amling and dorms (1994)” fundamentals of investments third edition Hareourt
Brace collage.
 Investment office of jimma zone September 2013/2014; an overview of investment in
jimma zone.
 Herbert B.mayo,(1997),an introduction to investment edition the Dryden press.
 Knife abrham (1998) Ethiopian dynamics economy.
 Mankiw (1992) macro economics edition, by worth publish, USA.
 World Bank (2006), report of investment in the world.
 World book of encyclopedia (1994), vol.10 AseotFetzer company united states of
America.
 World Bank report (1991), the relationship between private investment and economic
growth.

34
Appendix

ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT

COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS

JIMMA UNIVERSITY

A questionnaire designed to investigatefactors that affect the level of private investment in

case of jimma zone

This questionnaire is prepared to get relevant data to investigatethat affect the level of private
investment in case of jimmazone. So that you are kindly requested to respond the questions
forwarded below. Please fill the entire questions correctly and clearly. The researcher confidently
promise that the data collected would be for research purpose and kept confidently.

Remark: Dear respondents: please respond the questions frankly and honestly; your feedback is
very important. There is no need to write your name on the questionnaire. Use to answer
closed ended question and put “x“in the provided box to show your choice and use the space
provided to answer open ended questions.

35
Questioners
General directions

 No need to write your name

 Put tick mark in the box and for opened question write on the space provided.
 You can give more than one answer then it is necessary
 You are kindly requested to answer all questions
The following are questions that people includes in the sample are ask to attain the objective of
the study the researcher will use its research findings only for academic purpose.

Personal information

1. What is distribution of sectored private investment in Jimma zone of September2006?

A. Agriculture
B.Industry
C.Service
2. The number of investors who got investment permissions, capital invested, and job
opportunities created in each year of the last 5 years in the zone? A .Capital
B. Job opportunity
3. What is the participation of investors by citizenship?
A. Domestic
B. Foreign investors
C. Joint
4. What is the sex responses’ of investors? A. Male B.Female
5. Educational states of investor’s A. literate B.illitera

36
5.1 The literate states of investor’s A. primary school,

B. secondary school

C. The graduates of college and university.

D. other

6. The impact of education on private investment activity?

a. passive

B. Negative

7. What is the attitude of investors towards investment?

A. Very good B. Good C. Medium D. Bad

7.1. The attitude of investors before investing?

7.2. The attitude of investors after investing?

8. What is the attitude towards interest rate?

A. Passive attitude towards interest rate

B. Negative attitude towards interest rate

9. What are the problem faced by respondents in the privet investment and climate?

A. Political, No - of respondents

B. Social , No - of respondents

C. Economical, No - of respondents

D. Row material , No - of respondents

E. Other problems, No - of respondents

10. What Response of the problems of infrastructural facilities

A. Road, No - of respondents

B. Water, No- of respondents

37
C.Telephone. No - of respondents

D. Electricity, No - of respondents

11. What is the capacities of investors to invest ?

A. Utilized their capacity , No - of respondents

B .No utilized their capacity, No - of respondents

12. What Investment promotion activities done by the government bodies to attract new
investors.

A. Respondents, No- Investment promotion

B .Percentage, No - Investment promotion

13. The main causes of low level of privet investment in the Jimma zone?

Lack of infrastructural facilities

A. Problems related to preparation delivers and implementation fo privet investment land No of

respondents

B. Lack of sufficient finance of income, No - of respondents

C. Lack of good awareness of the government and the society towards privet investment Lack of
promotion effort to investor to the zone, No - of respondents

D .Lack of incentive and effective technical assistance form government bodies. No - of

respondents

38
DECLARATION

I, the undersigned, declare that this is my original work and has not been presented for a degree
in any other university and that all sources of materials used for the project have been duly
acknowledged.

Declared by Signature Date

. ...………………………… …………………. ………………………

Name of Advisor Signature Date

……………………………. …………….. ……………….

39