Scribd
Upload
21 views3 pages

APM Tools For Azure To GCP

Uploaded by

sourav.singh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
21 views3 pages

APM Tools For Azure To GCP

Uploaded by

sourav.singh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

APM Tools Azure to GCP

Key Considerations:
1. Observability Scope: Do you need to monitor just infrastructure (servers, containers, VMs), or are
you also focusing on application performance (response times, errors, etc.)?
2. Log Aggregation: If you need to aggregate logs across many services, tools like ELK or Loki can be
powerful.
3. Metrics Monitoring: If the focus is on infrastructure-level metrics, Prometheus is great due to its
pull-based model and time-series DB.
4. Tracing: For distributed systems and microservices, distributed tracing is crucial to pinpoint
bottlenecks across services. Tools like Jaeger or OpenTelemetry can be helpful.
5. Cost and Licensing: Some tools are open source but may have costs for hosting and scaling (e.g.,
ELK), while others like Datadog or New Relic have SaaS models with varying price tiers.
6. Cloud-native Integrations: GCP offers integrations with third-party APMs via Stackdriver, but tools
like Prometheus can easily integrate with Kubernetes.
APM Options:
1. ELK Stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana):
o Pros: Excellent for log aggregation and search, strong visualization capabilities (via Kibana),
scalable for high-volume logging, supports alerts.
o Cons: May require significant resources for setup, scaling, and maintenance. Costs can rise
based on data volume and retention policies.
o Fit: Ideal if you want in-depth log analysis across multiple services. It could be combined
with Prometheus for metrics.
2. Prometheus + Grafana:
o Pros: Best suited for time-series metrics, Kubernetes native, lightweight, open-source, and
highly customizable dashboards with Grafana.
o Cons: Metrics only (no logging or tracing out of the box), managing long-term storage can
require additional tools like Thanos or Cortex.
o Fit: Great if you’re primarily concerned with infrastructure or service metrics. Works well in a
cloud-native environment like GCP with Kubernetes.
3. Datadog:
o Pros: Full-stack observability (logs, metrics, traces), out-of-the-box integrations, easy setup,
managed SaaS, supports GCP and multi-cloud environments.
o Cons: Pricing can become expensive based on the number of hosts, log volume, and trace
retention.
o Fit: Good choice if you want an all-in-one solution with minimal setup and are okay with
SaaS pricing.
4. New Relic:
o Pros: Comprehensive APM with real-time monitoring, tracing, log management, cloud-native
support, easy to use for developers.
o Cons: Pricing can be high, especially for larger deployments.
o Fit: Suitable if you want to reduce complexity and prefer a commercial APM with strong
developer support.
5. OpenTelemetry (for Distributed Tracing):
o Pros: Open-source, vendor-neutral, works with multiple backends like Jaeger or Zipkin, easily
integrated with both Prometheus and ELK.
o Cons: May require more setup and configuration if you don’t pair it with a commercial
offering.
o Fit: Ideal if distributed tracing is a key requirement in your microservices architecture.
6. Splunk Observability:
o Pros: AI-driven, comprehensive observability platform covering logs, metrics, and traces.

o Cons: High cost for large data volumes due to ingestion-based pricing.

o Fit: Best for companies requiring enterprise-grade security, high scalability, and deep insights
across all cloud environments.

Additional APM Tools: AppDynamics (by Cisco), Dynatrace

Cost Estimation:
 Prometheus: Free to use but may have storage costs if you use long-term storage options like
Thanos.
 ELK: Open-source but requires infrastructure for deployment (if self-hosted) or usage costs if you
use a managed service.
 Datadog / New Relic: Compare pricing models and project based on the number of hosts,
containers, or transactions you'll monitor.
Evaluate GCP’s Native Tools:
 Consider using Google Cloud Operations Suite (formerly Stackdriver) for integrated metrics, logs,
and tracing. It's cloud-native, and while not as extensive as Datadog, it might be sufficient at a lower
cost.
Conclusion:
 Prometheus + Grafana for metrics and ELK for logs could be a cost-effective open-source
combination, but it may require ongoing maintenance and resources.
 Datadog or New Relic offer a comprehensive, easier-to-manage solution but with higher costs.
 Google Cloud Operations Suite could serve as a native, cost-efficient APM tool if your needs aren’t
too complex.

You might also like