0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views7 pages

Full Assignment 1 (Math2565)

Uploaded by

prathambhambi6
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views7 pages

Full Assignment 1 (Math2565)

Uploaded by

prathambhambi6
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

ASSIGNMENT 1 ( Math 2565)

Answer 1)

1.1

a. The cases are the 50 different varieties of coffee being ranked.

b. Variables and their possible values:

• Name of the coffee: Text strings (unique names)

• Price for a 12-ounce serving: Positive numerical values (likely in dollars)

• Overall rating: Numerical values from 0 to 100

• Roast: Light, medium, or dark

• Flavor rating: Numerical values from 0 to 10

• Aroma rating: Numerical values from 0 to 10

• Body rating: Numerical values from 0 to 10

c. Classification of variables:

• Name of the coffee: Categorical (nominal)

• Price for a 12-ounce serving: Quantitative (continuous)

• Overall rating: Quantitative (discrete)

• Roast: Categorical (ordinal)

• Flavor rating: Quantitative (discrete)

• Aroma rating: Quantitative (discrete)

• Body rating: Quantitative (discrete)

d. Yes, a label was used. The "name of the coffee" serves as a label to uniquely identify
each case (coffee variety) in the dataset.

e. Key characteristics of the dataset:

• Contains information on 50 varieties of coffee

• Includes both categorical and quantitative variables

• Provides comprehensive ratings (overall, flavor, aroma, body) on different aspects of


each coffee
• Includes pricing information for comparison

• Categorizes roast levels, allowing for analysis of preferences across roast types

• Uses different rating scales (0-100 for overall, 0-10 for specific attributes)

• Allows for multifaceted analysis and comparison of coffee varieties based on


various attributes

1.2

a. The cases for this set of data are the individual states. Each state represents a case in
the dataset.

b. Yes, there is a label variable. It is the "state" variable, which identifies each case (state) in
the dataset.

c. Identifying each variable:

• State: Categorical variable

• Number of students from the state who attend college: Quantitative variable

• Number of students who attend college in their home state: Quantitative variable

d. The quantitative variables can be used to explain several things about the states:

• The number of students from the state who attend college can indicate the overall
college-going population from each state, which might reflect factors like
population size, education emphasis, or economic conditions.

• The number of students who attend college in their home state can show how many
students choose to stay in-state for higher education. This could reflect factors such
as the quality or availability of in-state institutions, affordability of in-state tuition, or
state policies encouraging students to remain in-state.

e. This variable could be used to explain:

• The retention rate of students for in-state higher education

• The attractiveness or competitiveness of a state's higher education system

• Potential brain drain or brain gain scenarios for different states

• The effectiveness of state policies aimed at keeping students in-state for college

• Economic factors that might influence students' decisions to stay in-state or leave
for college
Answer 2)

2.1

a. Five-number summary: Minimum: 2.2 cm Q1 (25th percentile): 11.4 cm Median: 31.8 cm


Q3 (75th percentile): 44.4 cm Maximum: 69.3 cm

b. To make a boxplot, I would use the five-number summary

d. Summary of major features of this distribution:

The distribution of longleaf pine tree diameters in the Wade Tract appears to be right-
skewed (positively skewed). This means there are more trees with smaller diameters and
fewer trees with larger diameters.

Key observations:

• Range: The diameters range from 2.2 cm to 69.3 cm, showing considerable variation
in tree sizes.

• Central tendency: The median (31.8 cm) is less than the mean (which I estimate to
be around 35-40 cm based on the data), which is typical for right-skewed
distributions.

• Spread: There's a wide spread in the data, with the interquartile range (Q3 - Q1)
being 33 cm.

• Skewness: The distribution is clearly right-skewed, with a longer tail on the right
side.

Preference between boxplot and histogram: For these data, I would prefer a histogram.

Answer 3)

3.1

a. To find the height of the density curve between 0 and 5:

Area = Length * Height 1 = 5 * Height = 1/5 = 0.2

So, the height of the density curve between 0 and 5 is 0.2.

b. To find the proportion of outcomes that are more than 2:

The area under the curve represents the proportion of outcomes. The area to the right of
x=2 is:

Area = Length * Height = (5 - 2) * 0.2 = 3 * 0.2 = 0.6


So, 60% of outcomes are more than 2.

c. To find the proportion of outcomes between 2.5 and 3.0:

Area = Length * Height = (3.0 - 2.5) * 0.2 = 0.5 * 0.2 = 0.1

So, 10% of outcomes lie between 2.5 and 3.0.

Answer 4)

4.1 F(0) = 0 (since 0 < x < 1) F(1) = 1/2 (since 0 < x < 1) F(2) = 1/2 + (2-1)/4 = 3/4 (since 1 ≤ x ≤
3) F(4) = 1 (since x > 3)

Values | F(0) | F(1) | F(2) | F(4) Results | 0 | 1/2 | 3/4 | 1

4.2 The support set of this distribution is [0, 3].

4.3 Splitting the support into three intervals:

Interval | Probability Calculation | Height of Histogram Bar [0, 1) | F(1) - F(0) = 1/2 - 0 = 1/2 |
1/2 [1, 2) | F(2) - F(1) = 3/4 - 1/2 = 1/4 | 1/4 [2, 3] | F(3) - F(2) = 1 - 3/4 = 1/4 | 1/4

4.4 Splitting the support into 6 intervals:

Interval | Probability Calculation | Height of Histogram Bar [0, 0.5) | F(0.5) - F(0) = 1/4 - 0 =
1/4 | 1/2 [0.5, 1) | F(1) - F(0.5) = 1/2 - 1/4 = 1/4 | 1/2 [1, 1.5) | F(1.5) - F(1) = 5/8 - 1/2 = 1/8 | 1/4
[1.5, 2) | F(2) - F(1.5) = 3/4 - 5/8 = 1/8 | 1/4 [2, 2.5) | F(2.5) - F(2) = 7/8 - 3/4 = 1/8 | 1/4 [2.5, 3] |
F(3) - F(2.5) = 1 - 7/8 = 1/8 | 1/4

4.5 Create two histograms: one based on 4.3 (3 intervals) and one based on 4.4 (6
intervals).

4.6 Comparing the two histograms: The histogram with 6 intervals provides a more detailed
representation of the distribution. It shows that the probability is higher in the [0, 1) interval
and gradually decreases afterwards.

4.7 The distribution is right-skewed, as the probability mass is concentrated on the left side
of the support and gradually decreases towards the right.

4.8 Approximate median and mean:

The median is around 1, as F(1) = 1/2.

For the mean, we need a more refined histogram. Using the 6-interval histogram:

Mean ≈ 0.250.5 + 0.750.5 + 1.250.25 + 1.750.25 + 2.250.25 + 2.750.25 = 1.5

Values | Mean | Median Results | ≈1.5 | ≈1


The mean is greater than the median, which is consistent with a right-skewed distribution.

Answer 5)

solve question 5

I'll solve Question 5 step by step:

5.1 For the dataset X = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}:

Minimum: 1 Q1: 1.5 (25th percentile) Median: 3 Q3: 4.5 (75th percentile) Maximum: 5
Mean: (1+2+3+4+5)/5 = 3 Variance: [(1-3)^2 + (2-3)^2 + (3-3)^2 + (4-3)^2 + (5-3)^2]/5 = 2
Standard Deviation: √2 ≈ 1.414 IQR: Q3 - Q1 = 4.5 - 1.5 = 3

5.2 A box plot would be created based on these values, with the mean marked as "+".

5.3 For aX + k, where a > 0:

Minimum: a(1) + k Q1: a(1.5) + k Median: a(3) + k Q3: a(4.5) + k Maximum: a(5) + k Mean:
a(3) + k Variance: a^2 * 2 Standard Deviation: a * √2 IQR: a * 3

5.4 For Y in range [0, 1]:

Minimum: 0 Q1: 0.25 Median: 0.5 Q3: 0.75 Maximum: 1 Mean: 0.5 Variance: 1/12 ≈ 0.0833
Standard Deviation: 1/√12 ≈ 0.2887 IQR: 0.5

5.5 For Z in range [0, 1], replacing one value with z' in range [0, 1]:

Minimum: 0 Q1: 0 or 0.25 (depends on z') Median: 0.5 Q3: 0.75 or 1 (depends on z')
Maximum: 1 Mean: (3 + z')/7 Variance: changes based on z' Standard Deviation: changes
based on z' IQR: 0.5 or 0.75 (depends on z')
5.6 For W consisting of seven values {w1, ..., w7}: The maximum possible value of (w7 -
w1)/(w6 - w2) is when w7 is maximum (1), w1 is minimum (0), w6 is just slightly larger than
w2, and w2 is just slightly larger than 0.

So, the maximum possible value approaches 1/ε as ε approaches 0, where w6 = w2 + ε.

Theoretically, this could be infinitely large, but in practice, it would be limited by the
precision of the number representation.

5.7 For the standard normal distribution:

Q1 ≈ -0.67 and Q3 ≈ 0.67

The 1.5 IQR rule for outliers: Lower bound: Q1 - 1.5 * IQR ≈ -0.67 - 1.5 * (0.67 - (-0.67)) ≈ -
2.698 Upper bound: Q3 + 1.5 * IQR ≈ 0.67 + 1.5 * (0.67 - (-0.67)) ≈ 2.698

The proportion of the standard normal distribution outside these bounds is approximately
0.0070 or 0.70%.

This means about 0.70% of data points in a standard normal distribution would be
considered outliers according to the 1.5 IQR rule.

Answer 6)

6.1 Show that 1 = D(A) + D(A^c)

1. By Rule 2, D(S) = 1, where S is the sample space.

2. We know that A ∪ A^c = S and A ∩ A^c = ∅ (A^c is the complement of A)

3. Using Rule 3*: D(A ∪ A^c) = D(A) + D(A^c)

4. Therefore, D(S) = D(A) + D(A^c)

5. Substituting from step 1: 1 = D(A) + D(A^c)

6.2 Show that D(A) ≤ 1

1. From 6.1, we proved that 1 = D(A) + D(A^c)

2. By Rule 1, D(A^c) ≥ 0

3. Therefore, D(A) = 1 - D(A^c) ≤ 1

6.3 Show that E ⊆ F ⇒ D(E) ≤ D(F)

1. If E ⊆ F, then F = E ∪ (F \ E), where E and (F \ E) are disjoint


2. By Rule 3*: D(F) = D(E) + D(F \ E)

3. By Rule 1, D(F \ E) ≥ 0

4. Therefore, D(F) ≥ D(E)

6.4 Show that D(A ∪ B) = D(A) + D(B) - D(A ∩ B)

1. We can write A ∪ B as three disjoint sets: (A \ B), (B \ A), and (A ∩ B)

2. By Rule 3*: D(A ∪ B) = D(A \ B) + D(B \ A) + D(A ∩ B)

3. Note that A = (A \ B) ∪ (A ∩ B), so D(A) = D(A \ B) + D(A ∩ B)

4. Similarly, D(B) = D(B \ A) + D(A ∩ B)

5. Adding D(A) and D(B): D(A) + D(B) = D(A \ B) + D(B \ A) + 2D(A ∩ B)

6. Subtracting D(A ∩ B) from both sides: D(A) + D(B) - D(A ∩ B) = D(A \ B) + D(B \ A) + D(A
∩ B) = D(A ∪ B)

You might also like