See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/376955729

LANE AND SPEED BREAKER WARNING SYSTEM FOR VEHICLES

Article · November 2023

CITATIONS READS

0 132

6 authors, including:

Mrs.Kavita Sawant
Bharati Vidyapeeth's College of Engineering for women Pune
15 PUBLICATIONS 2 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Mrs.Kavita Sawant on 30 December 2023.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

www.ijcrt.org © 2023 IJCRT | Volume 11, Issue 11 November 2023 | ISSN: 2320-2882

LANE AND SPEED BREAKER WARNING

SYSTEM FOR VEHICLES
1
Prof. K. S. Sawant , 2Anuja Naphade , 3Sandhya Bhakare , 4Prachi Borse, 5Puja Bharane
1
Professor, 2Student , 3Student , 4Student , 5Student
1
Computer Department , 1BVCOEW, Pune , India

Abstract: In our rapidly urbanizing world, ensuring road safety is a pressing concern. The
development of advanced driver assistance systems has become imperative to reduce accidents and
enhance driver awareness. Maintaining full attention on the road is essential to prevent accidents.
Distracted or inattentive driving is a leading cause of traffic accidents. When drivers are not fully
engaged, their reaction times are slower, and they may fail to respond to sudden or unexpected events
on the road. This study presents a comprehensive Lane and Speed Breaker Warning System designed
to improve the safety of vehicles on the road. Fueled by cutting-edge machine learning techniques and
trained on data containing videos of lanes and speed breakers, a system can be created that
proficiently identifies lanes and speed breakers, offering timely alerts to drivers. This paper
meticulously delves into the broader implications of our work in striving to prevent accidents on the
road. As urbanization and vehicular traffic increase, road safety has never been more crucial. The
Lane and Speed Breaker Warning system is a proactive step towards mitigating risks. By harnessing
the power of machine learning, we empower the system to perceive and respond to its surroundings.
This not only enhances driver awareness but also minimizes the potential for accidents and discomfort
while driving. The Lane and Speed Breaker Warning System exemplifies a versatile solution for
monitoring road conditions.

Keywords: Lane and Speed Breaker Warning System, Road Safety, Machine Learning, Accident
Prevention

1.INTRODUCTION

In an era of unprecedented urbanization and surging vehicular traffic, the imperative of ensuring
road safety stands as a towering concern. Machine Learning algorithms can precisely detect lane
markings and speed breakers in complex road conditions, enhancing the reliability of warning
systems. Machine Learning allows for real-time analysis of data, enabling immediate alerts to drivers
when they approach speed breakers. This rapid response is crucial for accident prevention. The Lane
and Speed Braker warning system actively contribute to driver awareness, helping to prevent
accidents caused by slow reaction times. The Lane and Speed Breaker Warning System, using
machine learning, leverages machine learning algorithms to analyze data and detect lanes and speed
breakers, providing alerts. Numerous machine learning methods can be employed for the Lane and
Speed Breaker System, such as Convolutional Neural Networks.

IJCRT2311287 International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) www.ijcrt.org c455

www.ijcrt.org © 2023 IJCRT | Volume 11, Issue 11 November 2023 | ISSN: 2320-2882
2. LITERATURE REVIEW

The system proposed by Heltin Genitha C, Rajaji P, Rahul S [1] gives the accuracy of detection of
lane and speed breaker 78%-65% in different conditions and they used FCN and YOLOv5 model and
real time data. They used Roboflow dataset for speed breaker detection and Udacity dataset for lane
tracking. The predicted accuracy for Normal, shadowed and multiple speed breakers are 78%, 65%
and 75% respectively in different environment condition.

Shoubiao li et al. [2] has developed a lane detection network based on kernel convolution and
location, which can achieve a lane detection in complex scenes. They used the location boundary of
lanes. To improve accuracy they used center sampling strategy and designing B-CoordConv,the
method achieves a 79.50% F1 score on CULane and a 97.17% F1 score.

Rahul Ramakrishnan et al. [3] proposed a system for detection of speed breaker and alerting a driver
for oncoming speed breaker on the same route, they used a GPS coordinates .The hardware i.e.
Sensors detects a speed breaker based on the proximity of the vehicle with the road level and then
sends the Coordinates of the speed breaker to an online database ,then driver get notified.

Samia Sultana , Boshir Ahmed, Manoranjan Paul, Muhammad Rafiqul Islam , And Shamim
Ahmad[4] addressed a system vision based for multi lane detection in challenging condition using the
angle and length based constraints followed by Hough Transform. Propose a novel lane tracking
technique, to predict the lane position of the next Frame by defining a range of horizontal lane
position (RHLP) along the x axis which will be updated with Respect to the lane position of previous
frame. gives average detection rate is 97.55%.

Zahid Hasan, Samsoon Nahar Shampa et al. [5] used CNN and R-CNN for detection of potholes, deep
ridges and speed breaker by using the Smartphone camera. They used custom built Bumy dataset
which gives the accuracy upto 87%. The paper discusses the use of smartphone cameras and
Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for detecting potholes and speed breakers on roads. This
could involve using image processing techniques and machine learning to identify and alert drivers
about road hazards.

The authors Meng 1,2, Jing Yuan 3, And Shubin Li et al. [6] Proposed a system that detect the lanes
track them in multilane condition, they focused on improving the lane change rate. In traffic
conditions the lane change parameter and slope have important effects on the stability of traffic
system. They distances and equations to select the efficient lane during complex condition.

Fuquan Pan Lixia et al. [7] and other authors proposed a Lane-Changing Risk Analysis in Undersea
Tunnels Based on Fuzzy Inference. The authors analyzed lane-changing behaviors in an undersea
tunnel, focusing on three types: free, compulsory, and collaborative lane-changing. They employed
fuzzy inference models to assess the associated risks. The study strongly recommends prohibiting
compulsory lane-changing in downhill sections due to its extremely high risk, potentially leading to
traffic accidents.
The fuzzy inference models and risk assessment provide valuable insights for traffic safety
management in undersea tunnels and offer suggestions for drivers to ensure safe navigation in these
environments.

IJCRT2311287 International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) www.ijcrt.org c456

www.ijcrt.org © 2023 IJCRT | Volume 11, Issue 11 November 2023 | ISSN: 2320-2882
3. SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE

A system architecture for a lane and speed breaker warning system for vehicles using video input
typically involves several components and stages:

1.Input Dataset: This is the initial source of data. in this case, it's video feeds from the vehicle's
cameras. these videos are continuously captured as the vehicle moves.
2.Video Preprocessing: Before feeding the videos into the system, preprocessing may include tasks
such as frame extraction and stabilization to ensure a consistent and clean input for analysis.
3.Feature Extraction: Feature extraction involves analyzing the video frames to identify relevant
information. for lane and speed breaker detection, some of the features might include edge detection,
color analysis, and object tracking. features are essentially the characteristics of the video frames that
can be used for classification.
4.Classification CNN Algorithm: Convolutional neural networks (CNN) are commonly used for
image and video analysis. in this stage, a CNN model is used to classify the features extracted from
the video frames. for lane detection, it might identify lane markings, and for speed breaker detection,
it might identify road irregularities.
5.Lane And Speed Breaker Detection: Once the CNN has processed the features, it can classify
whether the video frame contains relevant information regarding lanes or speed breakers. this
classification can trigger alerts when lanes are deviated from or when a speed breaker is approaching.
6.Warning System: Based on the results of the classification, the warning system activates. for lane
deviations, it might provide warnings such as lane departure warnings, and for speed breakers, it could
trigger alerts to slow down or provide notifications to the driver.
7.Output And Feedback: The warnings and alerts generated by the system are presented to the
driver. this feedback could be in the form of visual, auditory, or haptic alerts, ensuring the driver is
aware of the road conditions.
8.Data Logging And Storage: It's essential to log data for future analysis and system improvement.
this can include storing video footage, feature data, and the results of the CNN classification for later
analysis and system refinement.
9.Real-Time Processing: The system must perform these tasks in real-time, as it needs to
continuously process the video feed and provide immediate warnings to the driver.
The system architecture combines computer vision (feature extraction and CNN) with real-time
processing and feedback mechanisms to enhance driver safety by detecting lanes and speed breakers.

IJCRT2311287 International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) www.ijcrt.org c457

www.ijcrt.org © 2023 IJCRT | Volume 11, Issue 11 November 2023 | ISSN: 2320-2882
4. CONCLUSION

Lane and Speed Breaker Detection systems have already made significant contributions to road
safety and transportation efficiency. These technologies have evolved over the years, and their future
holds even more promise. As the world of transportation continues to change and adapt to new
challenges, these systems will play an integral role.
In conclusion, these systems offer immense potential to enhance road safety, traffic management, and
overall transportation infrastructure. The incorporation of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and
real-time data analysis will continue to improve the accuracy and effectiveness of these systems. As
they become more widespread and integrated into various aspects of transportation, the future of Lane
and Speed Breaker Detection systems looks promising, ensuring safer and more efficient roadways for
all.

5. FUTURE SCOPE

1. Advanced Automation: Lane and Speed Breaker Detection can be integrated into advanced driver-
assistance systems (ADAS) and autonomous vehicles. This technology can help improve safety and
navigation for self-driving cars, paving the way for safer and more efficient transportation.
2. Predictive Maintenance: Lane and Speed Breaker Detection systems, when deployed on a larger
scale, can contribute to predictive maintenance of roads and highways. Authorities can identify and
address road issues before they become severe, saving resources and preventing accidents.
3.Multi-Modal Transportation: These systems can be adapted for various modes of transportation,
including bicycles and pedestrians. This can enhance the safety and experience of non-motorized
travelers.
4. Environmental Impact Assessment: Lane and Speed Breaker Detection systems can be used to
monitor and assess the environmental impact of road construction and maintenance. This data can be
crucial for making infrastructure decisions that align with sustainability goals.
5. Cross-Platform Compatibility: Future systems should aim for cross-platform compatibility,
ensuring that different types of vehicles, from conventional cars to electric scooters, can benefit from
lane and speed breaker detection.

6. REFERENCES

[1] H. G. C, R. P and R. S, "Detection of Lane and Speed Breaker Warning System for Autonomous
Vehicles using Machine Learning Algorithm," 2022 Third International Conference on Intelligent
Computing Instrumentation and Control Technologies (ICICICT), Kannur, India, 2022, pp. 401-406,
doi: 10.1109/ICICICT54557.2022.9917716.
[2] S. Li, X. Wu and Z. Wu, "Efficient Multi-Lane Detection Based on Large-Kernel Convolution and
Location," in IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 58125-58135, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3283440.
[3] R. Ramakrishnan, A. Pendse, C. Sharma and P. Chimurkar, "Speed Breaker Detection and
Mapping using IoT," 2020 Third International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive
Technology (ICSSIT), Tirunelveli, India, 2020, pp. 294-299, doi:
10.1109/ICSSIT48917.2020.9214224.
[4] S. Sultana, B. Ahmed, M. Paul, M. R. Islam and S. Ahmad, "Vision-Based Robust Lane Detection
and Tracking in Challenging Conditions," in IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 67938-67955, 2023, doi:
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3292128.
[5] Z. Hasan, S. N. Shampa, T. R. Shahidi and S. Siddique, "Pothole and Speed Breaker Detection
Using Smartphone Cameras and Convolutional Neural Networks," 2020 IEEE Region 10 Symposium
(TENSYMP), Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2020, pp. 279-282, doi: 10.1109/TENSYMP50017.2020.9230587.
[6] B. Meng, J. Yuan and S. Li, "Two-Lane Lattice Hydrodynamic Modeling at Sag Sections With the
Empirical Lane-Changing Rate," in IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 67240-67248, 2023, doi:
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3291806.
[7] F. Pan, L. Zhang, J. Wang, C. Ma, J. Yang and J. Qi, "Lane-Changing Risk Analysis in Undersea
Tunnels Based on Fuzzy Inference," in IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 19512-19520, 2020, doi:
10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2968584.

IJCRT2311287 International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) www.ijcrt.org c458

www.ijcrt.org © 2023 IJCRT | Volume 11, Issue 11 November 2023 | ISSN: 2320-2882
[8] C. Zhai and W. Wu, ‘‘A continuous traffic flow model considering predictive headway variation
and preceding vehicle’s taillight effect,’’ Phys. A, Stat. Mech. Appl., vol. 584, Dec. 2021, Art. no.
126364, doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2021.126364.
[9] Q. Ke, J. Silka, M. Wieczorek, Z. Bai, and M. Wozniak, ‘‘Deep neural network heuristic
hierarchization for cooperative intelligent transportation fleet management,’’ IEEE Trans. Intell.
Transp. Syst., vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 16752–16762, Sep. 2022.
[10] M. Woźniak, A. Zielonka, and A. Sikora, ‘‘Driving support by type2 fuzzy logic control model,’’
Exp. Syst. Appl., vol. 207, Nov. 2022, Art. no. 117798.
[11] Y. Sun, J. Li, X. Xu, and Y. Shi, ‘‘Adaptive multi-lane detection based on robust instance
segmentation for intelligent vehicles,’’ IEEE Trans. Intell. Vehicles, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 888–899, Jan.
2023.
[12] X. Ding, X. Zhang, Y. Zhou, J. Han, G. Ding, and J. Sun, ‘‘Scaling up your kernels to 31×31:
Revisiting large kernel design in CNNs,’’ in Proc. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), Jun. 2022,
pp. 11963–11975.
[13] T. Kong, F. Sun, H. Liu, Y. Jiang, L. Li, and J. Shi, ‘‘FoveaBox: Beyound anchor-based object
detection,’’ IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 29, pp. 7389–7398, 2020.
[14] X. Li, J. Li, X. Hu, and J. Yang, ‘‘Line-CNN: End-to-end traffic line detection with line proposal
unit,’’ IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 248–258, Jan. 2020.

IJCRT2311287
View publication stats
International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) www.ijcrt.org c459