Application Hanuman

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR

S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO.______/2024


IN
S.B. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. /2024

HANUMAN & ORS.


VERSUS
STATE OF RAJASTHAN
I N D E X

S.NO. PARTICULARS PAGE NO.


1. Memo of S.B. Criminal Misc.
Application along with amended
cause title.

PLACE: JAIPUR
DATED:
COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANTS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR

S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO.______/2024


IN
S.B. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. /2024

1. Hanuman S/o Laxmi Narayan, aged about 56


years,
2. Smt. Lali Devi W/o Hanuman, aged about 56
years,
3. Sugna D/o Hanuman, aged about 22 years,
All resident of Ramdev Colony, Sardar Singh
Dhani Road, Gandhi Nagar, Police Station
Gandhi Nagar, District Ajmer.
(Presently confined in Central Jail Ajmer)
...Accused-Appellants
Versus
State of Rajasthan - through Public
Prosecutor
...Respondent
S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION UNDER
SECTION 528 B.N.S.S. FOR CORRECTING/
RECTIFYING THE TITLE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
BY TAKING AMENDED CAUSE ON RECORD.
TO,
THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HIS
OTHER COMPANION JUDGES OF RAJASTHAN
HIGH COURT, JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR.
MAY IT PLEASE YOUR LORDSHIPS
The humble appellants/Applicants most
respectfully begs to submit as under:-
1. That the appellants filed the above
numbered Criminal Appeal before this
Hon’ble Court against the judgment dated
28.08.2024 passed by Special Judge,
SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Ajmer,
Rajasthan in which it is wrongly
mentioned that the “(presently confined
in Central Jail Ajmer)” whereas the
sentence awarded by the Learned Trial Court
was suspended by the Learned Trial Court for
one month and therefore, the appellants/
applicants is seeking from this Hon’ble
Court to take amended cause title of the
appeal on record.
It is, therefore, most humbly prayed
that your lordship may graciously be
pleased to accept and allow this Misc.
Application by taking the amended cause
title of the appeal on record to prevent
the miscarriage of justice.

Jaipur HUMBLE APPELLANTS/APPLICANTS


Date:- THROUGH THEIR COUNSEL

(DIPTI JAIN)
Advocate
NOTES
1. That no such S.B. Criminal Misc. application has
been filed previously in this matter before this
Hon’ble Court or Hon’ble Apex court of India.
2. That the copy of this S.B. Criminal Misc.
application is not required to be served upon
apposite counsel.
3. That as Pie papers were not readily available
hence, typed on stout papers.
4. That it has been typed by my private steno who
is not employee of Hon’ble High Court.

COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANTS/APPLICANT


AMENDED
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR.

S.B. CRIMINAL APPEAL No._________/2024

1. Hanuman S/o Laxmi Narayan, aged about 56


years,
2. Smt. Lali Devi W/o Hanuman, aged about 56
years,
3. Sugna D/o Hanuman, aged about 22 years,
All resident of Ramdev Colony, Sardar Singh
Dhani Road, Gandhi Nagar, Police Station
Gandhi Nagar, District Ajmer.

...Accused-Appellants
Versus
State of Rajasthan - through Public Prosecutor
...Respondent

CERTIFICATE UNDER RULE 311(3) OF THE RULES OF

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

...

It is certified that during the trial the

accused appellants were on bail and presently the

sentence awarded by the Learned Trial Court was

suspended by the Learned Trial Court for one

month.

COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANTS


AMENDED CAUSE TITLE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR.
S.B. CRIMINAL APPEAL No._________/2024
1. Hanuman S/o Laxmi Narayan, aged about 56
years,
2. Smt. Lali Devi W/o Hanuman, aged about 56
years,
3. Sugna D/o Hanuman, aged about 22 years,
All resident of Ramdev Colony, Sardar Singh
Dhani Road, Gandhi Nagar, Police Station
Gandhi Nagar, District Ajmer.

...Accused-Appellants
Versus
State of Rajasthan - through Public Prosecutor
...Respondent
S.B. CRIMINAL APPEAL UNDER SECTION 415
B.N.S.S. AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED
28.08.2024 PASSED BY DR. RENU SRIVASTAV,
R.J.S. (DISTRICT JUDGE CADRE), SPECIAL
JUDGE, SC/ST (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES)
AJMER, RAJASTHAN IN SESSIONS CASE NO.
154/2017 TITLED AS STATE OF RAJASTHAN
VS. HANUMAN & ORS., BY WHICH THE ACCUSED
APPELLANTS HAVE BEEN CONVICTED FOR THE
OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 323,
452 OF IPC AND SENTENCED AS UNDER:
U/S 323 OF IPC:- 06 MONTHS SIMPLE
IMPRISONMENT AND FINE OF RS. 500/-, IN
DEFAULT OF PAYMENT OF FINE FURTHER 05
DAYS ADDITIONAL SIMPLE IMPRISONMENT TO
ACCUSED APPELLANTS;
U/S 452 OF IPC:- 02 YEARS SIMPLE
IMPRISONMENT AND FINE OF RS. 3000/-, IN
DEFAULT OF PAYMENT OF FINE FURTHER 01
MONTHS ADDITIONAL SIMPLE IMPRISONMENT TO
ACCUSED APPELLANTS;
IT HAS BEEN ORDERED THAT ALL THE
SENTENCE SHALL RUN CONCURRENTLY AND THE
PERIOD PREVIOUSLY SPENT BY THE ACCUSED
DURING POLICE CUSTODY AND JUDICIAL
CUSTODY SHALL BE ADJUSTED IN THE
ORIGINAL SENTENCE UNDER SECTION 428
CR.P.C.
AMENDED CAUSE TITLE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL (SUSPENSION OF
SENTENCE) APPLICATION NO. ______/2024
IN
S.B. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. _______/2024
1. Hanuman S/o Laxmi Narayan, aged about 56
years,
2. Smt. Lali Devi W/o Hanuman, aged about 56
years,
3. Sugna D/o Hanuman, aged about 22 years,
All resident of Ramdev Colony, Sardar Singh
Dhani Road, Gandhi Nagar, Police Station
Gandhi Nagar, District Ajmer.
...Accused-Appellants
Versus
State of Rajasthan - through Public Prosecutor
...Respondent

S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION UNDER SECTION


430 B.N.S.S. FOR SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE IMPOSED
VIDE JUDGMENT DATED 28.08.2024 PASSED BY
DR. RENU SRIVASTAV, R.J.S. (DISTRICT JUDGE
CADRE), SPECIAL JUDGE, SC/ST (PREVENTION
OF ATROCITIES) AJMER, RAJASTHAN IN
SESSIONS CASE NO. 154/2017 TITLED AS STATE
OF RAJASTHAN VS. HANUMAN & ORS., BY WHICH
THE ACCUSED APPELLANTS HAVE BEEN CONVICTED
FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS
323, 452 OF IPC AND SENTENCED AS UNDER:
U/S 323 OF IPC:- 06 MONTHS SIMPLE
IMPRISONMENT AND FINE OF RS. 500/-, IN
DEFAULT OF PAYMENT OF FINE FURTHER 05 DAYS
ADDITIONAL SIMPLE IMPRISONMENT TO ACCUSED
APPELLANTS;
U/S 452 OF IPC:- 02 YEARS SIMPLE
IMPRISONMENT AND FINE OF RS. 3000/-, IN
DEFAULT OF PAYMENT OF FINE FURTHER 01
MONTHS ADDITIONAL SIMPLE IMPRISONMENT TO
ACCUSED APPELLANTS;
IT HAS BEEN ORDERED THAT ALL THE
SENTENCE SHALL RUN CONCURRENTLY AND THE
PERIOD PREVIOUSLY SPENT BY THE ACCUSED
DURING POLICE CUSTODY AND JUDICIAL CUSTODY
SHALL BE ADJUSTED IN THE ORIGINAL SENTENCE
UNDER SECTION 428 CR.P.C.

You might also like