0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views18 pages

1.2 Limits Formal Definition

Uploaded by

johara umpara
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views18 pages

1.2 Limits Formal Definition

Uploaded by

johara umpara
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 18

MAT 060/051

Calculus I /
The Calculus with Analytic Geometry 1

Mathematics Department
Mindanao State University Main Campus
Marawi City

September 14, 2021


1.2 Formal Definition of Limit

- The intention of the informal discussion in section 1.1 was to give you an
intuitive(unpremiditated) grasp of when a limit does or does not exist.
However, it is neither desirable nor practical to reach into a conclusion
on limit existence by merely basing on such intuition. We must be able
to evaluate a limit or discern its existence in a somewhat technical
fashion. The theorems that we shall consider and discuss in this section
establish such a means.
- Let us consider the table of values of the function given in Example 1.1.
In detail, the variation of f (x) = 12 (3x − 1) when x is close to 4 can be
written in the following conditional statements:

x 3.99 3.999 3.99999 3.99999


1
f (x) = 2 (3x − 1) 5.485 5.4985 5.49985 5.499985

x 4.01 4.001 4.0001 4.00001


f (x) 12 (3x − 1) 5.515 5.5015 5.50015 5.500015
If 3.9 < x < 4.1, then 5.35 < f (x) < 5.65.
If 3.99 < x < 4.01, then 5.485 < f (x) < 5.515.
If 3.999 < x < 4.001, then 5.4985 < f (x) < 5.5015.
If 3.9999 < x < 4.0001, then 5.49985 < f (x) < 5.50015.
If 3.99999 < x < 4.00001, then 5.499985 < f (x) < 5.500015.

If lim f (x) = L, we say that if we let the Greek letters  "Epsilon " and δ
x→a
"Delta" denote small positive real numbers, then each of the statements
above is of the form:

If 4 − δ < x < 4 + δ , then 5.5 −  < f (x) < 5.5 + .


For example,
- Let δ = 0.1 and  = 0.15 in the first statement, we have
If 3.9 < x < 4.1, then 5.35 < f (x) < 5.65;
- Let δ = 0.01 and  = 0.015 in the second statement; we have

If 3.99 < x < 4.01, then 5.485 < f (x) < 5.515.
- Let δ = 0.001 and  = 0.0015 in the third statement.
- Let δ = 0.0001 and  = 0.00015 in the fourth statement;
- and δ = 0.00001 and  = 0.000015 in the fifth statement and so on.
- In interval form, we have
If x is in the open interval (4 − δ, 4 + δ), then f (x) is in the open
interval (5.5 − , 5.5 + ) or equivalently,
If |x − 4| < δ , then |f (x) − 5.5| < 
- Since  and δ are positive real numbers, the statements above can be
written as
If 0 < |x − 4| < δ , then 0 < |f (x) − 5.5| < 
Definition
Definition 1.6 Let f be a function which is defined for all x on the open
interval I containing a, except posssibly at a itself. The limit of f (x) as x
approaches to a is L, written
lim f (x) = L
x→a
if for every  > 0, however small, there exists a δ > 0 such that
|f (x) − L| <  whenever 0 < |x − a| < δ .
From Definition 1.6 , if
lim f (x) = L,
x→a
we say that
limit of f (x), as x approaches a, is L.
- Since  can be arbitrarily small, f (x) can be made arbitrarily close to L
by choosing x sufficiently close to a.
- That is, if x is in the open interval (a − δ, a + δ), then f (x) is in the
open interval (L − , L + ).
- The following examples will illustrate how to show that lim f (x) = L
x→a
using the formal definition of limit:
Example
1.7 Prove that lim 12 (3x − 1) = 11
2 .
x→4

Solution: Let f (x) = 12 (3x − 1), a = 4, and L = 11


2 . By Definition 1.6, we
must show that for every  > 0, there exists a number δ > 0 such that if
0 < |x − 4| < δ , then 12 (3x − 1) − 11
2 < .
A clue to the choice of δ can be found by examining the inequality
1 11
2 (3x − 1) − 2 <  which involve . Then we have the following equivalent
inequalities:
-
1 11
(3x − 1) − <
2 2
1
|(3x − 1) − 11| < 
2
|3x − 12| < 2
3 |x − 4| < 2
2
|x − 4| < 
3
- The final inequality gives us the needed clue. If we take δ = 23 , then for
 > 0 there exist a δ > 0 such that |x − 4| < δ , then
1 11 1
(3x − 1) − = |(3x − 1) − 11|
2 2 2
1
= |3x − 12|
2
3
= |x − 4|
2
3
< δ
2
(1)
  
3 2
= 
2 3
= .

Therefore, lim 12 (3x − 1) = 11


2 .
x→4
Example
1.8 Prove that the lim (5x − 3) = 2.
x→1

Proof: Let  > 0. We show that there exists a δ > 0 such that

|(5x − 3) − 2| <  whenever 0 < |x − 1| < δ

Now,

|(5x − 3) − 2| < 
|5x − 5| < 
5|x − 1| < 

|x − 1| < .
5
Thus we have

|x − 1| < whenever 0 < |x − 1| < δ
5
Choose δ = 5 . Then, for  > 0 there exists δ > 0 such that if
0 < |x − 1| < δ , then

|(5x − 3) − 2| = 5|x − 1| < 5δ = 5 =
5
Hence,
|(5x − 3) − 2| <  whenever 0 < |x − 1| < δ
Thus, by Definition 1.6, lim (5x − 3) = 2.
x→1
Example
 
1
1.9 Show that lim does not exist.
x→0 x
 
1
Suppose that lim exists. Then for some number L,
x→0 x
 
1
lim = L.
x→0 x

Thus, for each  > 0, it is possible to find an interval (0 − δ, 0 + δ) containing


0 such that whenever 0 < |x − 0| < δ ,

1
|f (x) − L| = − L < .
x
- Now,
1 1
x− x−
 
1 1 − xL L L
|f (x) − L| = −L = = (−L) =L .
x x x x
1
- Note that for L 6= 0, L 6= 0, which is a contradiction. Hence, we can not
1
find a δ such that  every  > 0, if 0 < |x − 0| < δ , then
 for x − L < .
1
Therefore, lim does not exist.
x→0 x
Exercise 1.10 Prove that lim (3 + 2x) = 1
x→−1
Exercise 1.11 Establish the following limits by means of Definition 1.6:
1. lim (5x + 7) = 17
x→2
2. lim (10 − 2x) = 16
x→−3
x 
3. lim − 2 = − 35
x→1 3
4. lim x = π
x→π
5. lim 7 = 7
x→5

You might also like