1
TIPS BEFORE YOU START WRITING:
You are not required to use this template, although it will help you focus your answers
and make it easier for evaluation to read them!
The most important is to focus on thoroughly answering each question prompt to
demonstrate competency. That also requires you to "tie in" the model/theory and your
recommendations for change to an actual issue that the scenario company is
experiencing at this time.
We recommend using the recorded videos, etc., located in the course resource document
link within “Course Tips” for additional guidance.
Lastly, we recommend using software such as “Grammarly” or similar as you work on
your paper. You can also contact the WGU Writing Center for assistance with grammar,
sentence structure, APA format, etc.: Academic Coaching Center Writing Studio.
In responding to the questions on the Task, be sure to follow this framework:
a. Briefly state the concept/model and explain what it means/represents.
b. State how it can be applied based on why the company needs to change.
c. State why it is essential (how can it be used, why it will work, what impact/benefit it
will have to the organization)
2
Change Management Performance Assessment
Enter Your Name Here
Western Governors University
Important
Do not use generative AI answers for the prompts; your paper will be sent back for
revisions.
Be sure to use only the models as they are described in the course resources and not
anywhere online.
3
A. Discuss the need for change for the company in the scenario using either the
systems contingency model or the organizational life cycle model.
Observing the Organizational Life Cycle Model, an increase in sales from $1 m to
$100 m in a very short period would place the company in the Collectivity Stage. At this
stage, an organization witnesses a "crisis of autonomy." Organizations result in
centralized decision-making, leading to a need for more employee empowerment. This
crisis should be demonstrated in the delegation stage by decentralizing decisions that
empower employees to innovate (Acrobatiq, 2022). The need for more investment in
training by the company and the modernization of systems compounds the need for this
step. To achieve continued growth and international markets, the company must
decentralize decision-making while fostering creativity and updating outdated business
practices. Moving to the delegation stage will cure current issues, engage employees
more productively, and better position the company to effectively meet future growth
and competition.
B. Describe the differences (at least two) between a learning organization and a
traditional organization.
The concepts of organizational innovation and decision-making are different in
the case of a traditional organization versus a learning organization. A traditional
organization includes a hierarchy in which information and decisions are passed through,
slow responses against changes, and less employee empowerment. For example,
decisions must be passed on from layer to layer of management; hence, this does not
develop creativity and fast adaptation among employees (Acrobatiq, 2022). On the other
hand, a learning organization fosters continuous learning and innovation and encourages
4
a flatter structure that would further motivate employees at all levels to share ideas and
practice. For instance, companies like Google encourage creative thinking among
employees and invite them to take calculated risks while participating in organizational
decision-making to achieve more vibrant and responsive practices.
1. Identify which stage of Woolner's 5-stage model the company is currently in.
The company is currently in Stage 3 of Woolner’s 5-stage model.
a. Explain why the company is currently in the identified stage of Woolner's 5-
stage model.
The company is in Stage 3 because it values learning for growth, as demonstrated
by the leadership's goal to become a learning organization. However, internal training
programs need to be established fully.
2. Explain how the company from the scenario would use Senge's five disciplines to
become a learning organization.
Systems Thinking
Systems thinking means the organization is viewed as a whole entity, not as
fragments. The company can practice systems thinking by understanding that any change
created in one department is cognized of its effect on other departments (Hossain et al.,
2020). This holistic approach will help the company visualize the negative repercussions
of change and reduce those effects to ensure sustained improvement.
Personal Mastery
Personal mastery is about individuals learning and continuously improving. The
company will need to train and develop its employees, something it has yet to do in the
5
last decade. When individual growth is encouraged, the entire organization's performance
increases and the institution becomes more adaptive and innovative.
Mental Models
Mental models deal with testing one's assumptions and fostering new
perspectives. The company can realize this discipline by fostering openness of discussion
and reflections on the practices in place. By helping employees re-question and reframe
their views, the organization can break through outdated thinking and connect actions
with the dynamic business environment.
Building a Shared Vision
A shared vision is a common quest that can stimulate and energize all levels of
the organization. This could be attained when the company can generate a shared vision
wherein every employee is called upon to create or shape an explicit and exciting vision
statement (Soelton, 2023). This is a collective effort so that all men are emotionally
committed to the goals of the organization and their combined effort to become a learning
organization.
Team Learning
Team learning, in turn, centers on the group's capacity to solve problems and
share knowledge. The company has to encourage team learning through projects
requiring collaboration and forums for team dialogue. This discipline also refines
decision-making and enhances the organization's capacity to innovate, adapt, and change
in response to altered circumstances.
6
C. Identify the result and nature of the change to take the company from a traditional
organization to a learning organization using Balogun and Hope-Hailey's model.
The best quadrant flowing from this is an adaptation, where the nature of change
is incremental, and the result is a realignment since it allows the company to turn into a
learning organization incrementally, which would not be as disruptive.
1. Explain why the result and nature of change would be appropriate for the company
using Balogun and Hope-Hailey's model.
Realignment is favorable for the business, allowing the organization to renovate
its processes, enhance innovation, and head toward a flexible learning culture without
necessarily altering its structure. It provides stability in dealing with the company's
growth challenges and international expansion. The incremental nature of change applies
in that it is light enough to enable the company to ease itself from a traditional, command
top-down system of management into a more collaborative environment where, over
time, creativity and engagement are gradually fostered among its employees (Hodges,
2024). Minimum disruption and resistance will be minimized, allowing the transition to
run smoothly and become a learning organization.
D. Discuss how the four steps of the action research model could be applied to the
change process (from traditional organization to learning organization) for the
company in the scenario.
Identify the Problem or Opportunity
Diagnose specific problems and opportunities for change: Issues include the
company's inability to apply updated processes and policies and its inability to invest in
developing its employees to innovate and stay competitive. The opportunity for change
7
is to change the Organisation into a learning one that will enhance creativity and
continuous improvement (Scott, 2020). This will be an essential first step in specifying
what should be changed and why.
Consult with Change Management Experts
Seek professionals who can assist in bringing this transition into effect. These can
design strategies on how resistance might be overcome, how training programs could be
oriented, and how cultural change could be catalyzed. A professional consultation will
help design an all-rounded plan for updating old systems, making innovation a part of
company culture, and lining up new approaches with the company's goals and values.
Develop and Implement Action Plans
Draw up detailed action plans to wield the process of change. Initiations of new
training programs, a review of inventory management systems, and employee
involvement would be highly welcome to participate in critical decisions (Ma, 2023). In
the context of this company, that would involve structured professional development
programs, introducing new technologies, and opening lines for employee feedback and
experimentation. Action plans ensure that all aspects of the change are systematically
handled and that progress monitoring is possible.
Evaluate and Refine Strategies
Results and strategies would be reviewed after implementation and updated
appropriately. Check that new systems and practices realize their intended impact in
increased innovation and employee engagement. For the company, this would involve
reviewing results related to new training and upgraded technology. Feedback and
8
performance measures will be necessary to adjust and improve the transition to a
learning organization.
E. Recommend two innovation strategies that management could use to transition the
company in the scenario from a traditional organization to a learning organization.
The two innovation strategies that I recommend the management to use are cooperation
and exploration.
1. Explain how one recommended innovation strategy would be used by management
in the company's change process.
Management may use cooperation as an innovation strategy by encouraging
employees to share their knowledge and inspire the transformation of employees within
the company into a learning organization. Teamwork and cross-functional projects can be
stimulated, while peer-to-peer learning in an organization encourages its employees to
continue sharing expertise and learning from the experiences of other employees. The
collaborative environment encourages employees to solve problems together and leads to
innovative solutions and improved processes. For instance, structured collaboration
sessions or communities of practice are introduced by management to have employees
with different skill sets come together and deal with operational challenges. This instills
collective intelligence within the workforce that enables continuous evolution by learning
from others and innovation, hence hastening its movement towards becoming a learning
organization.
F. Discuss how the four steps of Kotter's 8-step model could be applied to the change
process for the company in the scenario.
Establish a Sense of Urgency
9
Communicate the requirement for change forcibly: Outmoded processes and a
lack of employee development carry significant risks. One can enthuse people and
garner support by emphasizing how rapid growth and international expansion drive the
need to innovate (Stanley, 2020).
Form a Powerful Guiding Coalition
Establish a powerful coalition of influential leaders and change agents at all levels
within the company to champion the movement toward becoming a learning
organization. It is through this coalition that the change will be driven and supported.
Develop a Vision and Strategy
Develop a coherent vision of the future for the learning organization that includes
specific goals about innovation, people development, and process improvement. Identify
strategic steps supporting this vision, including investment in training programs and the
modernization of systems.
Communicate the Change Vision
Cascade the vision and strategy through all organization levels in a consistent
manner. This keeps all the employees well-informed and motivated through multiple
channels, addressing their concerns and emphasizing the benefits of the transition.
G. Explain how each of the five pillars of sustainable change could be applied to
sustain the learning organization environment of the company in the scenario.
Leadership
How: It will be necessary for the leaders to take charge of the learning
organization initiative by providing their support and direction based on the company's
strategic plan, culture, and systems. Leaders should be good examples of learning and the
10
changes that may be required sometimes. What: It is the role of leaders to ensure that
learning is part of something happening in the organization (Reese, 2020). They must
ensure that learning initiatives are supported and embedded with the organization's
strategic plans. Why: First and foremost, it is necessary to emphasize that leadership
plays a critical role in maintaining the changes taking place in the organization because
heads define organizational culture and the priorities the organization follows. Therefore,
employees are encouraged to come to work with the same mindset by showing that the
leaders are willing to learn and develop.
Strategy
How: Management has to develop and execute plans that utilize the organization's
learning processes to provide a competitive edge against competitors. This may require
designing new learning products or presenting new ideas concerning learning delivery.
What: Strategic positioning requires integrating approaches to learning with the overall
plan in the organization in order to support and achieve the firm's competitive edge
(Cavallo et al., 2021). These may encompass specialization in specific fields or the use of
particular technologies. Why: The strategy used helps develop the learning initiatives,
such that they are not just single activities that are done but must be aligned with the
company's strategic plans. This way, the business will be relevant and effective in the
changing market environment and conditions.
Culture
How: Therefore, for a company to be a learning organization, it must encourage
learning by supporting the worth of learning amongst the staff. This entails fostering the
organization's learning culture, acknowledging it, and even incentivizing it. What: In a
11
strong learning culture, there is accessible communication, collective participation in
learning activities, and awareness of the mission and vision of the organization. The
integration of learning work and organizational activities as part of practice and process.
Why: Culture impacts employee receptiveness and participation in learning programs. An
appropriate culture enables learning to become a new way of doing things or a new status
quo, thus creating a reality of continuity.
Structure
How: This should also include establishing a sound communication structure that
supports sharing knowledge within the organization. This can be done by forming teams,
managing knowledge, using eclectic platforms, or any other most effective ways to share
knowledge. What: In other words, there has to be an optimal organization of the
structural elements to ensure a smooth flow of information and cooperation between the
different segments of the company. It should help manage knowledge so that the
employees can always find the knowledge they need and share it with the rest of the
team. Why: Towards this end, an integrated structure observes that changes are made
efficient by permitting knowledge and information to flow and to be appropriately
managed within the organization.
Systems
How: Organizational structures should be put in place that give accurate and
timely information and facilitate learning processes. This entails using technological tools
in data management, learning analytics, and performance tracking. What: Learning
records should also reflect organizational results, and information should be captured and
managed in systems. This may include assessment tools for monitoring and evaluating
12
learning outcomes and other learning needs. Why: An accurate measurement system
facilitates compliance monitoring of the learning solutions' efficiency. Using proper data
gives confidence that learning strategies are being enhanced and occasionally aligned to
the organization's needs.
References
Acrobatiq. (2022). Change Management. [Learning Resource for C721-Change Management].
Retrieved from
13
https://wgu-nx.acrobatiq.com/en-us/courseware/contents/wgu_C721_28Aug17_change_ma
ngmnt_1
Cavallo, A., Sanasi, S., Ghezzi, A., & Rangone, A. (2021). Competitive intelligence and strategy
formulation: connecting the dots. Competitiveness Review: An International Business
Journal, 31(2), 250-275. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/CR-01-
2020-0009/full/html
Hodges, J. (2024). People-centric Organizational Change: Engaging Employees with Business
Transformation. Kogan Page Publishers. https://www.koganpage.com/hr-learning-
development/people-centric-organizational-change-9781398612556
Hossain, N. U. I., Dayarathna, V. L., Nagahi, M., & Jaradat, R. (2020). Systems thinking: A
review and bibliometric analysis. Systems, 8(3), 23. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-
8954/8/3/23
Ma, M. (2023). Exploring Employee Participation in Corporate Volunteering in China:
Affecting Factors and Outcomes (Doctoral dissertation, Hong Kong Baptist University).
https://scholars.hkbu.edu.hk/ws/portalfiles/portal/80879564/G23THFL-038416T.pdf
Reese, S. (2020). Taking the learning organization mainstream and beyond the organizational
level: an interview with Peter Senge. The Learning Organization, 27(1), 6–16.
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/TLO-09-2019-0136/full/html
Scott, G. (2020). Change matters: Making a difference in education and training. Routledge.
https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781003115137/change-matters-
geoff-scott
14
Shelton, M. (2023). Conceptualizing Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Learning
Organization in the Labor Sector. Jurnal Organisasi Dan Manajemen, 19(1), 239-255.
http://jurnal.ut.ac.id/index.php/jom/article/view/4067
Stanley, R. A. (2020). Strategies Leaders in Nonprofit Organizations Use to Expand
Capacity (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
https://search.proquest.com/openview/a4ae720b58445c0cb0a75836264b15fd/1?pq-
origsite=gscholar&cbl=51922&diss=y
Wu, W., Wang, H., & Tsai, F. S. (2020). Incubator networks and new venture performance: the
roles of entrepreneurial orientation and environmental dynamism. Journal of Small
Business and Enterprise Development, 27(5), 727-747.
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JSBED-10-2019-0325/full/html