Practical Research 2 1
Practical Research 2 1
Prepared by:
JIMNAIRA U. ABANTO
Subject Teacher
Rubrics for Reporting:
30% SPEAKING SKILLS
o Delivery (presenter doesn’t rush, shows enthusiasm, uses complete sentences)
o Eye contact (presenter keeps head up, does not read, and speaks to whole audience)
o Posture(presenter stands up straight, faces audience, and doesn’t fidget)
o Volume(presenter can be easily heard by all)
50% CONTENT
o Introduction (presentation begins with a comprehensive outline and clear expectation)
o Topic Development
Presentation includes all elements within the concept of the title
Presentation is clearly organized. (material is logically sequenced, related to the outline, and not
repetitive)
Presentation shows full grasp and understanding of the material
20% Conclusion
o Presentation highlights key ideas and concludes with a strong final statement
o Presenter answers questions easily and confidently (has clear mastery of the subject)
Group No.
Lesson:
Reporters’ Speaking Introduction Topic Conclusion Total Remarks/Comment/Suggestions
Name Skills (10%) Development (20%) (100%)
(30%) (40%)
Group no.
Members Attendance Accountability Communication Adjusting Timely Total
submission 50/50
LESSON 1: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH DESIGN
Meaning of Quantitative Research Designs
When a man decides to build a house, does not he draws first the blue print before he will start to do the work? Same with
the conduct of research, the blueprint for the collection, measurement, and data analysis is drawn as a pattern to follow.
Furthermore, research designs enable the researcher to obtain a more valid, objective, reliable, and accurate answers to the
research questions.
Research design is defined as the logical and coherent overall strategy that the researcher uses to integrate all the
components of the research study (Barrot, 2017, p 102). In order to find meaning in the overall process of doing your
research study, a step-by-step process will be helpful to you.
In quantitative research, you are going to have a great deal of abstraction and numerical analysis. According to Fraenkel
and Wallen (2007, p 15), the research designs in quantitative research are mostly pre-established. Hence having an
appropriate research design in quantitative research, the researcher will have a clearer comprehension of what he is trying
to analyze and interpret.
Types of Quantitative Research Design
Quantitative Research Designs have five general classifications: descriptive, correlational, ex post facto, quasi-
experimental, and experimental.
1. Descriptive Research. When little is known about the research problem, then it is appropriate to use descriptive research
design. It is a design that is exploratory in nature. The purpose of descriptive research is basically to answer questions
such as who, what, where, when, and how much. So this design is best used when the main objective of the study is just to
observe and report a certain phenomenon as it is happening.
2. Correlational Research. The main goal of this design is to determine if variable increases or decreases as another
variable increases or decreases. This design seeks to establish an association between variables. It does not seek cause and
effect relationship like descriptive research; it measures variables as it occurs. It has two major purposes: (a) to clarify the
relationship between variables and (b) predict the magnitude of the association. However, the extent of the purpose of
correlational research depends on the scope and delimitation of the study.
3. Ex Post Facto. If the objective of the study is to measure a cause from a pre-existing effects, then Ex Post Facto
research design is more appropriate to use. In this design, the researcher has no control over the variables in the research
study. Thus, one cannot conclude that the changes measured happen during the actual conduct of the study.
The last two types of quantitative research designs are identifiable for the existence of treatment or intervention applied to
the current research study. Intervention or treatment pertains to controlling or manipulating the independent variable in an
experiment. It is assumed that the changes in dependent variables were caused by the independent variable.
There are also two groups of subjects, participants, or respondents in quasi- experimental and experimental research. The
treatment group refers to the group subjected to treatment or intervention. The group not subject to treatment or
intervention is called the control group.
4. Quasi-Experimental. The term means partly, partially, or almost – pronounced as kwahz-eye. This research design aims
to measure the causal relationship between variables. The effect measured is considered to have occurred during the
conduct of the current study. The partiality of quasi-experimental design comes from assigning subjects, participants, or
respondents into their groups. The groups are known to be already established before the study, such as age educational
background and nationality. Since the assignment of subjects, participants, or respondents are not randomly assigned into
an experimental or control groups, the conclusion of results is limited.
5. Experimental Research. This research design is based on the scientific method called experiment with a procedure of
gathering data under a controlled or manipulated environment. It is also known as true experimental design since it applies
treatment and manipulation more extensively compared to quasi-experimental design. Random assignment of subjects or
participants into treatment and control group is done increasing the validity of the study. Experimental research, therefore,
attempts to affect a certain variable by directly manipulating the independent variable.
Lunenberg and Irby (2008), as cited by Barrot (2017, p 107), also suggested different sample sizes for each
quantitative research design.
Literature Review. Another approach is by reading similar or related literature and studies to your current research study.
Since you are done writing your review of related literature and studies, you might want to recall how these studies
determine sample size.
Using this approach increases the validity of your sampling procedure. Formulas. Formulas are also being established for
the computation of an acceptable sample size. The common formula is Slovin’s Formula.
Power Analysis. This approach is founded on the principle of power analysis. There are two principles you need to
consider if you are going to use this approach: these are statistical power and effect size.
Probability Sampling in Quantitative Research
Simple Random Sampling. It is a way of choosing individuals in which all members of the accessible population are
given an equal chance to be selected. There are various ways of obtaining samples through simple random sampling.
These are fish bowl technique, roulette wheel, or use of the table of random numbers. This technique is also readily
available online. Visit this link https://www.randomizer.org/ to practice.
Stratified Random Sampling. The same with simple random sampling, stratified random sampling also gives an equal
chance to all members of the population to be chosen.
However, the population is first divided into strata or groups before selecting the samples. The samples are chosen from
these subgroups and not directly from the entire population. This procedure is best used when the variables of the study
are also grouped into classes such as gender and grade level.
You can simply follow the steps from this given example:
The number of members per subgroup is divided by the total accessible sample size. The percentage result of members
per subgroup will be multiplied from the computed total sample size. After obtaining the sample size per strata, then
simple random sampling will be done for the selection of samples from each group.
Cluster Sampling. This procedure is usually applied in large-scale studies, geographical spread out of the population is a
challenge, and gathering information will be very time-consuming. Similar to stratified random sampling, cluster
sampling also involves grouping of the population according to subgroups or clusters. It is a method where multiple
clusters of people from the chosen population will be created by the researcher in order to have homogenous
characteristics.
Systematic Sampling. This procedure is as simple as selecting samples every nth (example every 2nd, 5th) of the chosen
population until arriving at a desired total number of sample size. Therefore, the selection is based on a predetermined
interval. Dividing the population size by the sample size, the interval will be obtained. For example, from a total
population of 75, you have 25 samples; using systematic sampling, you will decide to select every 3rd person on the list of
individuals.
Semantic Differential. In this scale, a series of bipolar adjectives will be rated by the respondents. This scale seems to be
more advantageous since it is more flexible and easy to construct.
Another important consideration in constructing a research instrument is how to establish its validity and reliability.
Types of
Validity Validity
A research instrument is considered valid if it measures what it supposed to measure.
When measuring oral communication proficiency level of students, speech performance using rubric or rating scale is
more valid than students are given multiple choice tests.
Validity also has several types: face, content, construct, concurrent, and predictive validity.
Face Validity. It is also known as “logical validity.” It calls for an initiative judgment of the instruments as it “appear.”
Just by looking at the instrument, the researcher decides if it is valid.
Content Validity. An instrument that is judged with content validity meets the objectives of the study. It is done by
checking the statements or questions if this elicits the needed information. Experts in the field of interest can also provide
specific elements that should be measured by the instrument.
Construct Validity. It refers to the validity of instruments as it corresponds to the theoretical construct of the study. It is
concerning if a specific measure relates to other measures.
Concurrent Validity. When the instrument can predict results similar to those similar tests already validated, it has
concurrent validity.
Predictive Validity. When the instrument is able to produce results similar to those similar tests that will be employed in
the future, it has predictive validity. This is particularly useful for the aptitude test.
Reliability of Instrument
Reliability refers to the consistency of the measures or results of the instrument.
Test-retest Reliability. It is achieved by giving the same test to the same group of respondents twice. The consistency of
the two scores will be checked.
Equivalent Forms Reliability. It is established by administering two identical tests except for wordings to the same
group of respondents.
Internal Consistency Reliability. It determines how well the items measure the same construct. It is reasonable that
when a respondent gets a high score in one item, he will also get one in similar items. There are three ways to measure the
internal consistency; through the split-half coefficient, Cronbach’s alpha, and Kuder-Richardson formula.
Describe the Differences and Similarities between the Experimental and Control Group. State what will happen
and what will not both in the experimental and control groups. This will clearly illustrate the parameters of the
research groups.
Describe the Procedures of the Intervention. In particular, describe how will the experimental group receive or
experience the condition. It includes how will the intervention happens to achieve the desired result of the study.
For example, how will the special tutorial program will take place?
Explain the Basis of Procedures. The reason for choosing the intervention and process should clear and concrete
reasons. The researcher explains why the procedures are necessary. In addition, the theoretical and conceptual
basis for choosing the procedures is presented to establish the validity of the procedures.
In addition, in choosing statistical techniques in quantitative research, the purpose or objective of the research study
should be considered.
Test of Relationship between Two Variables
Pearson’s r (parametric)
Phi coefficient (non-parametric for nominal and dichotomous variables)
Spearman’s rho (non-parametric for ordinal variable)
Test of Difference between Two Data Sets from One Group
T-test for dependent samples (parametric)
McNemar change test (non-parametric for nominal and dichotomous variables)
Wilcoxon signed-rank test (non-parametric for ordinal variable)
Test of Difference between Two Data Sets from Two Different Groups
T-test for independent samples (parametric)
Two-way chi-square (non-parametric for nominal
variable) Mann-Whitney U test (non-parametric for
ordinal variable)
Test More than Two Population Means
Analysis of Variance or ANOVA (parametric)
Test the Strength of Relation or Effect or Impact
Regression (parametric)
LESSON 7: DATA COLLECTION INSTRUMENTS
Collecting data is the first step you need to perform before you proceed in writing your data analysis and interpretation.
Data Collection involves obtaining relevant information regarding the specified research questions or objectives. This can
be done by utilizing research instruments that are either developed or adopted. In collecting the data, the researcher must
decide on the following questions:
(1) Which data to collect?
(2) How to collect the data?
(3) Who will collect the data?
(4) When to collect the data? (Barrot, 2018,p138).
Quantitative research instruments comprise questionnaires, interviews, tests, and observation. On the other hand, data
collection approaches for qualitative research usually involve: (a) direct interaction with individuals on a one to one basis,
(b) and or direct interaction with individuals in a group setting. When developing and utilizing a research instrument, the
following steps are to be considered:
1. Be clear with your research question.
2. Plan how you will conduct the data collection.
3. Use appropriate research instruments.
4. Collect, tabulate, tally, and analyze the data.
5. Verify the validity and reliability of the collected data.
6. Present your findings.
Research Instruments
Questionnaires
A questionnaire consists of a series of questions about a research topic to gather data from the participants. It consists of
indicators that is aligned to the research questions. Gathering of information can be carried out in the following methods:
face to face, by telephone, or through e-mail, messenger, social media post, or using computer programs or forms (Barrot,
2018, p 138).
In quantitative research, questionnaires use the following approaches: (1) scale (usually Likert scale); and (2) conversion
of responses into numerical values, e.g. strongly as 5, agree as 4, neutral as 3, disagree as 2, and strongly disagree as 1.
The terms survey and questionnaire have different meanings. A questionnaire is an instrument used to collect data while a
survey is a process of collecting, recording, and analyzing data. Questionnaires can be structured, semi-structured, or
unstructured.
There are three structures of making a questionnaire. The first, structured questionnaires employ closed-ended questions.
Unstructured questionnaires, on the other hand, use open-ended questions in which the research participants can freely
answer and put his thoughts into it. Lastly, semi-structured questionnaires are combinations of both the structured and
unstructured ones. Structured type is commonly used in quantitative studies because it is easier to code, interpret
objectively, and, most of all, easier to standardize.
Advantages of Using Questionnaire
1. Data can be quickly gathered from a big number of participants.
2. The participants are encouraged to be open to the researchers since their identity can be made
anonymous. Disadvantages of Using Questionnaire
1. The questions can be interpreted differently by the participants.
2. Some participants will not be able to complete the required responses.
3. Some questionnaires will not be returned on time.
4. Some questionnaires will be lost.
5. The answers from participants may lack depth.
Guidelines in Using Questionnaires for Data
Collection
1. Choose the method of administering the questionnaire.
a. Face-to-face Method. Use this when you need to capture the emotions, behavior, and non-verbal cues of the participants
b. Online Method. Use this when behavior and non-verbal cues need not to be taken
2. Divide your questionnaire into two or three parts.
a. Personal information. This section which contains background information of the participants. (Names are optional)
b. Main section. This lists the specific questions or indicators.
c. Open-ended question section. This contains additional information that might be needed. (This applied only for
quantitative research)
3. Make sure to craft questions and choices that are aligned with specific research questions or objectives.
4. Provide specific and clear directions for respondents in answering the questionnaire.
5. Use routing (directing) technique if there is a need to skip some items in the questionnaire.
6. Begin with the general questions first followed by the specific ones.
7. Prefer to have brief, clear, and concise questionnaire. Use simple terms.
8. Predetermined responses or choices should match the nature of the questions.
a. If the content is about belief, use agreement (strongly agree , agree, neutral, disagree, strongly disagree)
b. If the questionnaire is about behavior, use extent (very great extent, great extent, moderate extent, small extent, none at
all)
c. If questions are about frequency, use frequency (always, frequently, sometimes, seldom, never)
d. If the content is about quality, use quality (excellent, very good, good, poor) Later, these responses will be translated
into numerical values (e.g. five-point Likert scale)
9. Avoid negative statements unless necessary.
10. Avoid leading and biased, double-barreled, and very sensitive questions.
11. Do not split the questions or choices over two pages.
12. If possible, schedule an appointment before distributing the questionnaires.
13. Attach a cover letter to the questionnaire especially for agency connected respondents.
14. Make a follow-up on the participants who did not to return the questionnaire.
15. Tally and encode the data immediately once you have collected them and archive them digitally.
Tests
Tests are used for assessing various skills and types of behavior as well as for describing some characteristics. There are
two types of test used in quantitative research: Standardized test and Non-standardized test.
Standardized test is scored uniformly across different areas and groups. It is usually administered by institutions to
assess a wide range of groups such as students and test-takers. It is considered as more reliable and valid. Examples are
Achievement test, University Entrance Exam, Personality Tests, and the likes.
Non-standardized test may not be scored uniformly. It is administered to a certain set of people.
Types of Test Questions
1. Recall Questions. It requires participants to retrieve information from memory (e.g. fill- in-the blank test, identification
test, enumeration test, etc.)
2. Recognition Questions. It provides respondents to select from given choices the best or correct choice (e.g. multiple-
choice test, true or false test, yes or no test, etc.)
3. Open-ended Questions. It allows the respondents more freedom in their responses, expressing their thoughts and
insights (e.g. essay writing tests and other performance-based tests.
Interview
A quantitative interview is a method of collecting data about an individual’s behaviors, opinions, values, emotions, and
demographic characteristics using numerical data.
Difference between Quantitative and Qualitative Interviews
Observation
Observation is another method of collecting data that is frequently used in qualitative research. However, it can be used in
quantitative research when the observable characteristics are quantitative in nature (e.g. length, width, height, weight,
volume, area, temperature, cost, level, age, time, and speed)
Observation allows the researcher to observe the actual event or phenomenon. It has greater flexibility in the observation
method. However, observation may lack participant validity and may be prone to the Hawthorne effect phenomenon.
Furthermore, it is more exhausting and time-consuming especially when observations need to be conducted for many
years).
Forms of Observation
1. Controlled Observation. It is usually used in experimental research and is done under a standard procedure. It provides
more reliable data (obtained through structured and well-defined process). The procedure can be replicated, and the data
are easier to analyze. Lastly, the observer performs a non-participant role (i.e. does not interact with the participants).
2. Natural Observation. It is carried out in a non-controlled setting. It has greater ecological validity (i.e. flexibility of the
findings to be generalized to real-life contexts). It also responds to other areas of inquiry not initially intended by the
researcher. Its major limitation is its strength to establish a causal relationship due to the presence of extraneous variables
which can affect the behavior of the participants
3. Participant Observation. It allows the observer to become a member of the group or community that the participants
belong to. It can be performed covertly (i.e. participants are not aware of the purpose behind the observation. It can be
done also overtly, wherein participants know the intention or objectives of the observation
Project Information
Research Title: IMPROVING SPEED AND ACCURACY IN MATH PROBLEM-SOLVING USING
THE SINGAPOREAN METHOD AMONG GRADE 7 STUDENTS OF CNNHS-X
Researcher: Rico A. Lopez Phone: 09283434567/856-3454
School: Chicken Nuggets National High School-X Department: Senior High School
2. PROCEDURES
You will be asked to use the workbook prepared by the Math Society and attend the math class at the
Computer Laboratory. You will also be interviewed via Focus Group Discussion to obtain information regarding your
reactions or responses to the approach.
Specifically, you will be asked to do the following: (1) You will be asked to attend the Math class that uses
the Singaporean approach for the whole term. (2) You will be interviewed by your Math teacher for two (2) hours
about your responses regarding the Singaporean approach of learning Mathematics and the challenges you
encounter using this approach.
The expected duration of your participation is from October 2020 to January 2021.
5. FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS
No amount will be required from you during your participation in this study.
6. CONFIDENTIALITY
Your identity in this study will be treated with utmost confidentiality. The results will be published for
academic purposes only. However, any data obtained as a result of your participation in this study may be checked
by the sponsor, by the person conducting this study and or by the research panelists.
9. AUTHORIZATION
I have read and understood this consent form, and I volunteer to participate in this research study. I understand
that I will receive a copy of this form. I voluntarily choose to participate, but I understand that my consent does not
take away any legal rights in the case of negligence or other legal fault by anyone who is involved in this study. I
further understand that nothing in this consent form is intended to replace any applicable laws.
Tabulation is a process of arranging data. In many studies, table is used to do this process. Tabulation can done manually
or electronically using MS Excel. Again organize the data based on your research questions. Before inputting your data
into the table, it will be helpful to review your statistics class on how to arrange data according to the statistical techniques
you will use. Take note that the digital tool you are going to use will also matter on how you are going to tabulate your
data; like MS Excel, Minitab, or other digital tools have different ways of entering your data. Correct arrangement of your
data will be helpful during actual data analysis.
Presentation and Interpretation of Data
The next step after editing, coding, and tabulating the data is to present them into graphical or visual presentation called
non-prose materials. The purpose of presenting the data in this way is to make the outlined of the results more presentable.
Non-prose materials are composed of graphs, bars, tables, charts, diagrams, illustrations, drawings, and maps.
In quantitative research, tables and graphs are usually used. Standard format in presenting the data into a table or a graph
like its title, labels, contents, and many more can be followed as well when school institutional format is not provided or
identified. You may visit APA, CMOS, or MLA on how to do so.
Tables
Table helps summarize and categorize data using columns and rows. It contains headings that indicate the most important
information about your study.
To interpret the tables, one needs to do the following:
1. Analyze the connections among the details of the headings.
2. Check the unusual pattern of the data and determine the reason behind these.
3. Begin with the table number and the title.
4. Present the significant figures (overall results, high and low values, the unusual pattern).
5. Refrain from repeating again what’s inside the table.
6. Support your findings with literature and studies that confirms or contrasts your results.
7. Establish the practical implications of the results. This will add value to your research findings.
8. End with a brief generalization.
Sample Interpretation for the Given Table
Graphs
Graphs focuses on how a change in one variable relates to another. Graphs use bars, lines, circles, and pictures in
representing the data. In interpreting the graph, it is the same process in table. In choosing what type of graph to use,
determine the specific purpose of the presentation. Line Graph illustrates trends and changes in data over time, Bar Graph
illustrates comparisons of amounts and quantities, while Pie Graph (Circle Graph) displays the relationship of parts to a
whole.
Statistical Techniques
1. Percentage is any proportion from the whole.
2. Mean or average is the middlemost value of your list of values and this can be obtained by adding all the values and
divide the obtained sum to the number of values.
One need to get the range from which the mean of a five-point Likert can be interpreted. There are two methods to do
this, if we treat the Likert scale as interval/ratio. First, the usual way is to calculate the interval by computing the range
(e.g. 5− 1 = 4), then divided it by the maximum value (e.g. 4 ÷ 5 = 0.80). Ultimately, we get the following result:
From 1 to 1.80 represents (strongly disagree).
From 1.81 to 2.60 represents (do not agree).
From 2.61 to 3.40 represents (true to some extent).
From 3:41 to 4:20 represents (agree).
From 4:21 to 5:00 represents (strongly agree).
The other way is to treat the selection as the range themselves, and so we get these results:
From 0.01 to 1.00 is (strongly disagree);
From 1.01 to 2.00 is (disagree);
From 2.01 to 3.00 is (neutral);
From 3.01 to 4:00 is (agree);
From 4.01 to 5.00 is (strongly agree)
4. Correlation Analysis (Pearson’s r) is a statistical method used to estimate the strength of relationship between two
quantitative variables.
Step 2. From the table of values, there is a strong positive correlation between the grade in Math and the grade in English.
5. Regression Analysis is can be used to explain the relationship between dependent and independent
variables. Three major uses:
a. Causal analysis -shows you the possible causation of changes in Y by changes X.
b. Forecasting an Effect- allows you estimate and predict the value of Y given the value of X.
c. Linear Trend Forecasting- helps you trace the line best fit to tine series
Example:
Using the same data from Table 3, answer the following questions:
a. What linear equation best predicts the grade in English given the grade in Math?
Step 2: Substitute the value of m and b to the regression formula. The regression equation for predicting the grade
in English given the grade in Math is Y = X + 1.
b. If a student made a grade of 91 in Math, what grade would you expect the student to obtain in
English? Using the obtain equation Y = X + 1, substitute 91 in X.
Y = 91 + 1 = 92 (Grade in English)
According to this model, for every 1point increase in the Math grade, there is a corresponding average increase of
1 point in the English grade.
Interpretation:
The Math grade is directly proportional to the English grade because the slope is positive.
6. Hypothesis testing. A hypothesis test helps you determine some quantity under a given assumption. The outcome of the
test tells you whether the assumption holds or whether the assumption has been violated.
In first quarter, you were exposed to creating your Null hypothesis (H0) which states that there is no difference between
the two values or variables and the Alternative hypothesis (H1) which states that there is a difference between two values
or variables.
The statistical test uses the data obtained from a sample to decide about whether the null hypothesis should be rejected. In
a one-tailed test (left-tailed or right-tailed test), when the test value falls in the critical region on one side of the mean, the
null hypothesis should be rejected.
On the other hand, in a two-tailed test, the null hypothesis should be rejected when the test value falls in either of the two
critical regions.
To perform hypothesis testing, you compute the mean from the sample and compare it with the mean from the population.
Then, you decide whether to reject or not reject the null hypothesis. If the difference is significant, the null hypothesis is
rejected. If the difference is not significant, then the null hypothesis is not rejected. In the hypothesis- testing, there are
four possible results.
The four possibilities are as follows:
1. It would be an incorrect decision and would result in a Type I error when you reject the null hypothesis when it is true.
2. It would be a correct decision when you reject the null hypothesis when it is false.
3. It would be a correct decision when you do not reject the null hypothesis when it is true.
4. It would be an incorrect decision and would result in a Type II error when you do not reject the null hypothesis when it
is false.
The basic format for hypothesis testing:
1. State the hypotheses and identify them.
2. Find the critical value(s).
3. Compute the test value.
4. Make the decision.
5. Summarize the result.
Hypothesis testing can be done using the following t-value approach or critical value approach and p-value approach.
1. The Critical Value Approach is used to determine whether the observed test statistic is more extreme than a defined
critical value. Hence, the observed test statistic (calculated on the basis of sample data) is compared to the critical value,
from t-table. If the test statistic (t∗) is more extreme than the critical value (t), the null hypothesis is rejected. If the test
statistic is not as extreme as the critical value, the null hypothesis is not rejected.
Example:
A random sample of 10 Grade 7 students has grades in Math, where marks range from 90 (Good) to 98 (Excellent).
The general average grade (Gen. Ave.) of all Grade 7 students as of the last 5 years is 93. Is the Gen. Ave. of the 10
Grade 7 students different from the population’s Gen. Ave? Use 0.05 level of significance.
Computational Procedure:
1. Define the Null and Alternative Hypothesis
H0: There is no significant difference between the gen. ave. of 10 Grade 7 students from the population’s gen. average of
93.
H0: μ = 93
H1: There is a significant difference between the gen. ave. of 10 Grade 7 students from the population’s gen. average of
93.
H1: μ ≠ 93
2. State the alpha and the degree of
freedom. α = 0.05
Df = n − 1 = 10 − 1 = 9
3. State the decision rule.
6. Decision: Accept Ho
7. Conclusion: Therefore, the average grade of 10 Grade 7 students is not different from the population’s average grade
in Math which is 93.
2. P-value Approach involves determining the probability (assuming the null hypothesis were true) of observing a more
extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed. If the P-value is less than (or
equal to) α then the null hypothesis is rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis. And, if the P-value is greater than α,
then the null hypothesis is not rejected.
Example:
Use the same data from Example 1 of Critical value approach: