Scribd
Upload
3 views

Assignment 4

Uploaded by

Claudia De La Rosa Salamanca
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
3 views

Assignment 4

Uploaded by

Claudia De La Rosa Salamanca
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Applied Statistics – Assignment 4

A team of researchers is interested in studying the impact of different teaching methodologies on the
grades of 1st year University students for a given subject.

In particular, they are interested in comparing three methods of instruction: A= Flipped classroom, B=
Collaborative learning and C= Direct instruction. They are also interested in studying whether the
effect of teaching instruction is different in the “Morning” and “Evening” groups since the “Evening
group” is mostly composed of students taking the subject for a second time. In order to study these
effects, they will consider the final grades of a total of 60 students.

The researchers have also collected data on the level of satisfaction of students with their learning
process at different time points during the semester.

1- Use the appropriate measures to summarize all data contained in the file assignment4.sav
2- Are there significant differences in final grade scores for different teaching methodologies?
3- Are there significant differences in final grades scores for different class schedules
(morning/evening)?
4- Is there a significant interaction between method of instruction and class schedule?
5- Is there a significant change in level of satisfaction for the students over time?

We have los datos de 60 sujetos y vamos a hacer un Anova sobre ello.


Descriptives - Grade
Mea
Class Group SD N
n
Evening A 5.100 1.468 10
B 5.550 0.643 10
C 5.450 0.896 10
Mor-
A 6.750 1.439 10
ning
B 8.100 1.022 10
C 4.600 0.699 10

ANOVA - Grade
Mean Squa-
Cases Sum of Squares df F p
re
Class 18.704 1 18.704 16.090 < .001
Group 32.400 2 16.200 13.935 < .001
Class ✻ Group 31.033 2 15.517 13.348 < .001
5
Residuals 62.775 1.163
4
Note. Type III Sum of Squares
Hypotesis del ANOV: DIferencias entre venir de mañana o de tarde
Diferencias entre las distintas metodologias
Diferencias intervencion

Se rechaza la hipotesis nula de la clase, porque los tres grupos no son distintos.
Diferencias significativas con alfa de 0,05 entre los grupos A y B
Post Hoc Comparisons – Group
Mean Difference SE t p tukey
A B -0.900 0.341 -2.640 0.029
C 0.900 0.341 2.640 0.029
B C 1.800 0.341 5.279 < .001
Note. P-value adjusted for comparing a family of 3
Note. Results are averaged over the levels of: Class

Comparar los grupos de las tres metodologías-----hipótesis del hoc post

Se interpreta Como que las distintas methodologies de enseñanzad funcionan distintos en las
metpodlogias de mañana que de tarde.

Descriptives plots

Post Hoc Comparisons - Group


Mean Difference SE t Cohen's d p tukey
AB -0.900 0.341 -2.640 -0.563 0.029
C 0.900 0.341 2.640 0.678 0.029
B C 1.800 0.341 5.279 1.422 < .001
Note. Cohen's d does not correct for multiple comparisons.
Note. P-value adjusted for comparing a family of 3
Note. Results are averaged over the levels of: Class
Repeated Measures ANOVA
Within Subjects Effects
Cases Sum of Squares df Mean Square F p
RM Factor 1 2944.633 ᵃ 3ᵃ 981.544 ᵃ 27.072 ᵃ < .001 ᵃ
Residuals 3154.367 87 36.257
Note. Type III Sum of Squares
ᵃ Mauchly's test of sphericity indicates that the assumption of sphericity is violated (p < .05).

Between Subjects Effects


F
Cases Sum of Squares df Mean Square p
Residuals 4808.167 29 165.799
Note. Type III Sum of Squares

Descriptives
Descriptives
RM Factor 1 Mean SD N
24.60 3
Level 1 8.324
0 0
22.93 3
Level 2 9.752
3 0
28.33 3
Level 3 8.487
3 0
35.80 3
Level 4 6.178
0 0

Descriptives plots

Post Hoc Comparisons - RM Factor 1


Mean Difference SE t Cohen's d p holm
Level.
Level.2 1.667 1.555 1.072 0.196 0.287
1
Level.3 -3.733 1.555 -2.401 -0.438 0.037
Post Hoc Comparisons - RM Factor 1
Mean Difference SE t Cohen's d p holm
Level.4 -11.200 1.555 -7.204 -1.315 < .001
Level.
Level.3 -5.400 1.555 -3.473 -0.634 0.002
2
Level.4 -12.867 1.555 -8.276 -1.511 < .001
Level.
Level.4 -7.467 1.555 -4.803 -0.877 < .001
3
Note. Cohen's d does not correct for multiple comparisons.
Note. P-value adjusted for comparing a family of 6

Diferencias significativas de satisfaccion entre todos los meses excepto entre el 1 y el 2.las diferencias
mas grandes son entre el 2 y 4 y 1 y 4 , y la mas pequeña entre el 1 y 2.

You might also like