0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views

Correlation Data

Uploaded by

9carmelaarobillo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views

Correlation Data

Uploaded by

9carmelaarobillo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 13

Amount of

Number of fruits
fertilizer (kg)
1 25
2.5 32
3 35
3 32
3.4 35
4 39
4 41
4.5 40
Amount of fertilizer (kg)
Amount of fertilizer (kg)
Number of fruits
Amount of fertilizer (kg)
Number of fruits
1
0.96739509464143 1
fruits

2.44948974278318
2.36962436154293numerator
0.935853269136293
0.0641467308637066
0.253272049116571denominator
9.35604370797464t

8.45488528478586E-05 < 0.05


REJECT NULL
SIGNIFICANT RELATIONSHIP
6

2.44948974278318

2.36962436154293

2.3696244 0.935853269136293

2.3696244 0.0641467308637066

0.253272049116571

0.253272 9.35604370797464

14.52071

14

Standard E 0.267642771359932

Median 3.4
Mode 3
Standard D 0.708116213222501
Sample Var 0.501428571428574
Kurtosis -1.2169787582893
Skewness 0.0840881177867504
Range 2
Minimum 2.5
Maximum 4.5
Sum 24.4
Count 7
Amount of fertilizer (kg)
Number of fruits

Amount of fertilizer (kg) 1

Number of fruits 0.967395094641426 1

t Stat -16.63778

P(T<=t) one 6.412E-11


t Critical o 1.76131
P(T<=t) two 1.282E-10
t Critical tw 2.144787
Kurtosis -1.975671
Skewness 0.064472 ANOVA
Range 9 df SS
Minimum 32 Regression 1 7.875205
Maximum 41 Residual 6 0.539795
Sum 254 Total 7 8.415
Count 7
Coefficients Standard Error
Intercept -3.83579217447082 0.7568
X Variable 1 0.201026298909557 0.021486
mber of fruits SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics

Multiple R 0.967395

R Square 0.935853

Adjusted R 0.925162

Standard E 0.299943

Observatio 8

ANOVA

df SS MS

Regression 1 7.875205 7.875205

Residual 6 0.539795 0.089966

Total 7 8.415

Coefficients
Standard Error t Stat
Intercept -3.835792 0.7568 -5.068438
Number of f0.201026 0.021486 9.356044

MS F Significance F
7.875205 87.53555 8.455E-05
0.089966

t Stat P-value Lower 95%Upper 95%


Lower 95.0%
Upper 95.0%
-5.068438 0.002292 -5.687614 -1.98397 -5.687614 -1.98397
9.356044 8.455E-05 0.148451 0.253601 0.148451 0.253601
F Significance F

87.5355538655323 8.455E-05

P-value Lower 95%Upper 95%Lower 95.0%


Upper 95.0%
0.00229151292967421 -5.687614 -1.98397 -5.687614 -1.98397
8.45488528478571E-05 0.148451 0.253601 0.148451 0.253601
Family No. Size of Family

1 3
2 5
3 9
4 6
5 7
6 5
7 8
8 4
9 7
10 6
11 3
% of income
spent for food

38
34
25
39
40
35
25
30
35
35
40
Size of Family

Size of Family 1

% of income spent f-0.570947

SIGNIFICANT RELATIONSHIP

9 11-2=9

3 9sqrt=3

1.7320508075689 sqrt3

-0.9889090840267 n

-0.9889090840267

1.9889090840267

1.4102868800449 d
-1.4261036760855 t

0.1095175461915 <
REJECT NULL HO
% of income spent for food

1 Moderate Correlation

There is negative relationship existing between the size of family percentage of income spent for foo

value -0.57095 x 1.73 SUMMARY OUTPUT

value -0.57095 x -1.73

1--0.988 Regression Statistics

sqrt 1.988 Multiple R 0.536939954641


nxd R Square 0.28830451489
Adjusted R Square 0.199342579251
0.05 Standard Error 1.633664001306
Observations 10

ANOVA
df SS
Regression 1 8.64913544669
Residual 8 21.3508645533
Total 9 30

Coefficients Standard Error


Intercept 11.96613832853 3.35415443747
38 -0.1765129683 0.09805122149
centage of income spent for food .

MS F Significance F
8.649135446686 3.2407626118 0.109518
2.668858069164

t Stat P-value Lower 95%Upper 95%Lower 95.0%


Upper 95.0%
3.567557353607 0.0073196685 4.231444 19.70083 4.231444 19.70083
-1.80021182414 0.1095175462 -0.402619 0.049594 -0.402619 0.049594

You might also like