Agashe 1 Seminar

SEMINAR REPORT
Submitted to the State Board of Technical Education, Kerala
in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of
DIPLOMA IN COMPUTER ENGINEERING
By:
AGASHE GIRISH
Register No: 2201131288
On
BRAIN FINGERPRINTING
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER ENGINEERING

SREE RAMA GOVT. POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
THRIPRAYAR, P.O VALAPAD, THRISSUR DIST,
KERALA - 680567
2024-2025
SREERAMA GOVT. POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE, THRIPRAYAR
P.O VALAPAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER ENGINEERING
CERTIFICATE
Certified that this is the bonafide report of seminar on “BRAIN
FINGERPRINTING” submitted by AGASHE GIRISH, Reg. No. 2201131288, final
year Diploma in Computer Engineering at SREERAMA GOVT. POLYTECHNIC
COLLEGE, THRIPRAYAR in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the award of
Diploma in Computer Engineering under the Directorate of Technical Education, Kerala
state during the academic year 2024-2025.
INTERNAL EXAMINER FACULTY IN CHARGE
EXTERNAL EXAMINER HEAD OF DEPARTMENT

Vision and Mission of the Institution
Vision
Moulding technically competent and socially responsible professionals.
Mission
M 1: To create an excellent academic ambiance with the state of the art of
infrastructure
in harmony with the sustainable development.
M 2: To equip the students with social and employable skills and inculcate the
habit of lifelong learning.
Vision and Mission of the Department and PEO

Vision
Create technically competent and socially responsible computer professionals
capable of working in the global environment.
Mission
M 1 : Impart quality education to achieve academic excellence through innovation
in teaching learning process and nurture an aptitude for lifelong learning
M2 : Expose the students to the cutting-edge technologies and state of the art tools
to achieve sustainable development
M 3 : Inculcate ethical values, communication and entrepreneurial skills to cater to
the needs of the society and industry
Program Educational Objectives
PEO 1 : To empower students to identify, formulate and solve problems by
applying their knowledge in Mathematics and Computer Programming.
PEO 2 : To develop industry focused skills and leadership qualities to become
successful engineers and entrepreneurs.
PEO 3 : To inculcate a passion towards higher education and lifelong learning in
the field of Computer Science and Engineering.
Seminar Report 2024-25 Brain Fingerprinting
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First of all I would like to express my sincere gratitude and thanks to God
almighty whose blessing and grace always been there with me for the successful
completion of my seminar with great enthusiasm and pleasure that I bringing out this
seminar.
I express my sincere thanks to Principal Mr. Baburajan T S, Sree Rama Govt.
Polytechnic College, Thriprayar.
I would also like to express my sincere thanks to my Head of the Department
Mr. Sabu K J, Department of Computer Engineering for the successful completion of
this seminar.
I express my sincere gratitude to Seminar Coordinators Mrs. Neena M K, for her
cooperation and guidance for preparing & presenting this seminar.
Last but not the least thankful to all members of my department for providing their
valuable support in this seminar. I also expressing thanks to my parents and all friends
who give me extreme support for completion of this seminar.
AGASHE GIRISH
Reg. No: 2201133188
Dept. of Computer Engineering i S.R.G.P.C Thriprayar

ABSTRACT
Brain fingerprinting is a Neurotechnology that detects hidden information in the

brain by measuring electrical brain wave responses to stimuli, such as words or images,
presented on a computer screen. Using EEG event-related potentials, specifically the
P300-MERMER response, it identifies significant cognitive processing related to the
recognition of stimuli. This technique has applications in criminal investigations,
counterterrorism, and intelligence gathering. The study explores various brain
fingerprinting techniques, its applications, and comparisons with other technologies.
Dept. of Computer Engineering ii S.R.G.P.C Thriprayar

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 TECHNIQUE 2
2. BRAIN FINGERPRINTING 3
2.1 OVERVIEW 3
2.2 PROCESS 3
2.2.1. Stimuli Presentation 3
2.2.2. Brain Wave Measurement 3
2.2.3. Analysis 4
3. HISTORY 5
3.1 EARLY DEVELOPMENT (1990 s) 5
3.2 EARLY APPLICATIONS (2000 s) 5
3.3 FURTHER DEVELOPMENT (2010 s) 5
3.4 CURRENT STATUS (2020 s & BEYOND) 5
4. WORKING OF BRAIN FINGERPRINTING 6
4.1 EEG AND BRAIN WAVES 6
4.1.1. Electroencephalography (EEG) 6
4.1.2. Brainwave Components 6
4.2 EQUIPMENT USED 7
4.2.1. EEG System 7
4.1.2. Stimuli Presentation System 7
5. BRAIN FINGERPRINTING PROCESS 8
5.1. PREPARATION 8
5.2. BASELINE RECORDING 8
5.3. STIMULI PRESENTATION 8
Dept. of Computer Engineering iii S.R.G.P.C Thriprayar

5.4. EEG RECORDING 8
5.5. INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS 8
5.6. REPORTING 9
6. APPLICATIONS 10
6.1 CRIMINAL JUSTICE 10
6.1.1. Investigative Tool 10
6.1.2. Evidence Evaluation 10
6.1.3. Screening & Security 10
6.2 COUNTER TERRORISM 11
6.2.1. Screening for Threats 11
6.2.2. Evaluating Suspects 11
6.2.3. Border Security 11
6.3 MEDICINE 11
6.3.1. Neurological Diagnosis 11
6.3.2. Cognitive Function Assessment 12
6.3.3. Personalized Medicine 12
6.4 ADDITIONAL APPLICATIONS 12
7. ADVANTAGES & LIMITATIONS 14
7.1. ADVANTAGES 14
7.2. LIMITATIONS 14
8. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS 15
8.1. BRAIN FINGERPRINTING 15
8.1.1. Informed Consent 15
8.1.2. Privacy And Data Security 15
8.1.3. Accuracy And Reliability 15
8.1.4. Psychological Impact 15
Dept. of Computer Engineering iv S.R.G.P.C Thriprayar

8.1.5. Cultural And Societal Implications 16
9. FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS 17
10. INTEGRATION WITH AI 18
11. CONCLUSION 19
12. REFERENCES 20
Dept. of Computer Engineering v S.R.G.P.C Thriprayar

LIST OF FIGURES
Fig.2.1 P300 Wave Detection Graph 3
Fig.4.1 Brainwave Pattern Diagram 6
Fig.4.2 EEG System Diagram 7
Fig. 4.3 Stimuli Presentation 7
Fig. 5.1 Brain Finger Printing Section 9
Fig.6.1 Applications 10
Fig.6.2 Criminal justice system 12
Dept. of Computer Engineering vi S.R.G.P.C Thriprayar

CHAPTER 01
INTRODUCTION
Brain Fingerprinting was developed and patented in 1995 by Dr. Lawrence A.

Farwell, chairman of the Brain Wave Institute in Fairfield, Iowa, and former Harvard
University research associate. Brain fingerprinting is based on the theory that throughout
any action, the brain plans, records, and executes all of the actions. Such details, all
concealed within the brain, can now be revealed through brain fingerprinting. This
technique measures how brain waves respond to specific words or pictures flashed across
a screen. Pictures, both relevant and irrelevant to the actions, are shown. The relevant
images should trigger memories of subject. Basic fundamental of this technique is
whether an individual recognizes specific information related to an event or activity by
measuring electrical brain wave responses to words, phrases or pictures presented on
computer screen.
The technique can be applied only in situations where investigators have a

sufficient amount of specific information about an event or activity that would be known
only to the perpetrator and Investigator. In this respect, Brain Fingerprinting is considered
a type of Guilty Knowledge. Brain Fingerprinting testing will be able to dramatically
reduce the costs associated with investigating and prosecuting innocent people and allow
law enforcement professionals to concentrate on suspects who have verifiable, detailed
knowledge of the crimes. Brain fingerprinting‟ is the patented technology that can
measure objectively, for the first time, how memory and cognitive functioning of
Alzheimer sufferers are affected by medications. Brain fingerprinting in spite of its
limitations is a definitive tool in revolutionizing the way criminal cases can be solved and
also extending to medical and cases of national security. Thus, brain fingerprinting is a
promise to a future void of tampered evidences or as a definite shot at humanitarian
peace.
Dept. of Computer Engineering 1 S.R.G.P.C Thriprayar

1.1 TECHNIQUE
Brain Fingerprinting is designed to determine whether an individual recognizes

specific information related to an event or activity by measuring electrical brain wave
responses to words, phrases, or pictures presented on a computer screen. The technique
can be applied only in situations where investigators have a sufficient amount of specific
information about an event or activity that would be known only to the perpetrator and
investigator. In this respect, Brain Fingerprinting is considered a type of Guilty
Knowledge Test, where the "guilty" party is expected to react strongly to the relevant
detail of the event of activity. Existing (polygraph) procedures for assessing the validity
of a suspect's "guilty" knowledge rely on measurement of autonomic arousal (e.g., palm
sweating and heart rate), while Brain Fingerprinting measures electrical brain activity via
a fitted headband containing special sensors. Brain Fingerprinting is said to be more
accurate in detecting "guilty" knowledge distinct from the false positives of traditional
polygraph methods, but this is hotly disputed by specialized researchers.
The technique uses the well-known fact that an electrical signal known as P300 is
emitted from an individual's brain beginning approximately 300 milliseconds after it is
confronted with a stimulus of special significance, e.g. a rare vs. a common stimulus or a
stimulus the subject is asked to count. The application of this in brain fingerprinting is to
detect the P300 as a response to stimuli related to the crime or other investigated
situation, e.g., a murder weapon, victim's face, or knowledge of the internal workings of a
terrorist cell. Because it is based on EEG signals, the system does not require the subject
to issue verbal responses to questions or stimuli.

CHAPTER 02
BRAIN FINGERPRINTING
2.1 OVERVIEW
Brain Fingerprinting is a technique that identifies if specific information is stored

in a person's brain. It works by measuring brainwave responses (particularly the P300
wave) to stimuli like images or words using EEG. This method is used to determine if the
brain recognizes certain information, which can be applied in legal and security contexts.
2.2 PROCESS
2.2.1. STIMULI PRESENTATION
The subject is shown specific stimuli, which could be images, words, or sounds
related to the information being tested. These stimuli are presented in a controlled
environment.
2.2.2. BRAIN WAVE MEASUREMENT
During the presentation of stimuli, an electroencephalogram (EEG) measures the

brain's electrical activity. The focus is on detecting the P300 wave, a specific brainwave
pattern associated with recognition.
Fig.2.1 P300 Wave Detection Graph

2.2.3. ANALYSIS
The recorded brainwave patterns are analyzed to determine whether the P300 wave
was elicited. If the P300 wave is detected, it indicates that the subject recognized the
stimuli, suggesting that the information is stored in their brain.

CHAPTER 03
HISTORY
3.1 EARLY DEVELOPMENT (1990 s)
Brain Fingerprinting was developed in the 1990s by Dr. Lawrence Farwell. The
initial research focused on establishing the theoretical foundation and experimenting with
the technology to prove its effectiveness in detecting recognition of familiar stimuli in the
brain.
3.2 EARLY APPLICATIONS (2000 s)
In the 2000s, Brain Fingerprinting was applied in a few legal cases, leading to
controversy and debate. The technique faced scrutiny over its accuracy, ethical
implications, and legal admissibility, which limited its widespread adoption.
3.3 FURTHER DEVELOPMENT (2010 s)
The 2010s saw advancements in EEG technology and increased interest in the
ethical aspects of Brain Fingerprinting. Researchers continued to refine the technology,
addressing its limitations and exploring its potential in various fields, including criminal
justice and counterterrorism.
3.4 CURRENT STATUS (2020 s & BEYOND)
Today, Brain Fingerprinting remains an area of active research. Ongoing studies

focus on validating the technique, improving its accuracy, and addressing legal and
ethical challenges. The technology is not yet universally accepted but continues to evolve,
with potential for broader application in the future.

CHAPTER 04
WORKING OF BRAIN FINGERPRINTING
4.1 EEG AND BRAIN WAVES
Fig.4.1 Brainwave Pattern Diagram
4.1.1. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY (EEG)
EEG is a noninvasive method that records electrical activity in the brain using
electrodes placed on the scalp. It measures brainwaves, which are patterns of electrical
activity produced by the brain's neurons.
4.1.2. BRAINWAVE COMPONENTS
The P300 wave is a positive peak in the EEG signal that occurs approximately 300
milliseconds after a person recognizes something familiar. Brain Fingerprinting relies on
detecting this P300 wave to determine if the subject recognizes the presented stimuli.

4.2 EQUIPMENT USED
4.2.1. EEG SYSTEM
Fig.4.2 EEG System Diagram
This system includes electrodes that are placed on the subject’s scalp, an amplifier
to boost the electrical signals, and a computer system that records and analyzes the brain
activity..
4.1.2. STIMULI PRESENTATION SYSTEM
A controlled environment, often involving a computer, is used to present the relevant

stimuli (e.g., images, words) to the subject while their brain activity is being recorded.
Fig. 4.3 Stimuli Presentation

CHAPTER 05
BRAIN FINGERPRINTING PROCESS
Brain fingerprinting allows investigators to identify or exonerate subjects through

measurement of brain-wave responses to crime-related pictures or words presented on a
computer screen. The technique is based on the principle that the brain is central to all
human activities; it plans, executes, and records information. If a subject has information
pertaining to a crime, that information is permanently recorded in the brain and, with
proper training and technology, can be retrieved. The article describes some of the
benefits of brain fingerprinting as well as concerns about the technique (.
5.1. PREPARATION
The process begins with obtaining the subject's informed consent and setting up
the EEG system. Electrodes are placed on the subject's scalp to measure brain activity.
5.2. BASELINE RECORDING
An initial recording of the subject's brain activity is taken to establish a baseline.

This helps in comparing subsequent brainwave patterns during the test.
5.3. STIMULI PRESENTATION
Relevant stimuli, such as words or images related to the information being tested,
are presented to the subject in a controlled manner.
5.4. EEG RECORDING
The EEG system continuously records the subject’s brain activity while they are
exposed to the stimuli. The focus is on detecting the P300 wave.
5.6. INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS
The analyzed data is used to determine whether the subject recognized the
presented stimuli, suggesting that the information is stored in their brain.

5.7. REPORTING
The findings are documented and presented, often in the context of a legal or
investigative process, where the results are used as evidence or support for a case.
Fig.5.1 Brain Finger Printing Section

CHAPTER 06
APPLICATIONS
Fig.6.1 Applications
6.1 CRIMINAL JUSTICE
6.1.1. INVESTIGATIVE TOOL
Brain Fingerprinting can identify whether a suspect has knowledge related to a

crime, such as recognizing details of a crime scene or weapon. This can help investigators
narrow down suspects.
6.1.2. EVIDENCE EVALUATION
The technique can be used to assess whether a suspect’s knowledge is consistent

with the details of a crime, potentially providing evidence of involvement or innocence.
6.1.3. SCREENING & SECURITY
In high-security scenarios, Brain Fingerprinting can be used to screen individuals

for potential threats or to assess their knowledge of specific criminal activities.

6.2 COUNTER TERRORISM
Brain fingerprinting can help address the following critical elements in the fight
against terrorism. Aid in determining who has participated in terrorist acts, directly or
indirectly. Brain fingerprinting technology is based on the principle that the brain is
central to all human acts. In a terrorist act, there may or may not be peripheral evidence
such as fingerprints or DNA, but the brain of the perpetrator is always there, planning,
executing, and recording the crime. The terrorist has knowledge of organizations, training
and plans that an innocent person does not have. Until the invention of Brain
Fingerprinting testing, there was no scientific way to detect this fundamental difference.
Brain Fingerprinting testing provides an accurate, economical and timely solution to the
central problem in the fight against terrorism. It is now possible to determine
scientifically whether or not a person has terrorist training and knowledge of.
6.2.1. SCREENING FOR THREATS
Brain Fingerprinting can detect whether individuals have knowledge of terrorist

activities, which can be crucial in preventing attacks.
6.2.2. EVALUATING SUSPECTS
It helps assess if suspects possess detailed knowledge of specific terrorist threats or

plans, aiding in investigations and security efforts.
6.2.3. BORDER SECURITY
The technique can be employed at border checkpoints to identify individuals with

knowledge of terrorist activities, enhancing national security.
6.3 MEDICINE
6.3.1. NEUROLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS
Brain Fingerprinting can aid in the early detection of neurological disorders like
Alzheimer’s by identifying cognitive impairments before they manifest in behavior.

6.3.2. COGNITIVE FUNCTION ASSESSMENT
The technique can evaluate cognitive impairments in patients and monitor their
progress over time, helping in treatment planning.
6.3.3. PERSONALIZED MEDICINE
By analyzing brainwave patterns, treatments can be tailored to an individual's

cognitive profile, potentially improving outcomes for patients with neurological
conditions.
6.4 ADDITIONAL APPLICATIONS
In advertising, Brain Fingerprinting Laboratories will offer significant advances in

measuring campaign and media effectiveness. Most advertising programs today are
evaluated subjectively using focus groups. We will be able to offer significantly more
advanced, scientific methods to help determine the effectiveness of campaigns and be
very cost competitive with current methodologies. This technology will be able to help
determine what information is actually retained in memory by individuals. For example,
in a branding campaign do people remember the brand, the product, etc. and how do the
results vary with demographics? We will also be able to measure the comparative
effectiveness of multiple media types.
Fig.6.2 Criminal justice system

In the insurance industry, Brain Fingerprinting Laboratories will be able to help

reduce the incidence of insurance fraud by determining if an individual has knowledge of
fraudulent or criminal acts. The same type of testing can help to determine if an
individual has specific knowledge related to computer crimes where there is typically no
witness or physical evidence.

CHAPTER 07
ADVANTAGES & LIMITATIONS
7.1. ADVANTAGES
 Non-Invasive: Brain Fingerprinting is non-invasive, requiring only scalp

electrodes and causing no discomfort or harm to the subject.
 High Accuracy: The technique is considered to have high accuracy in detecting

whether specific information is stored in the brain, making it a valuable tool in
legal and security contexts.
 Useful in Legal & Security Fields: The objective nature of Brain Fingerprinting
data can provide strong evidence in investigations, enhancing the reliability of
legal and security proceedings.
7.2. LIMITATIONS
 Ethical Concerns: There are significant ethical issues surrounding Brain

Fingerprinting, including concerns about privacy, consent, and the potential for
misuse.
 Limited Scope: The technique is not universally accepted or proven in all

contexts, and its effectiveness can vary depending on the situation and stimuli
used.
 Dependence on Proper Stimuli: The accuracy of Brain Fingerprinting relies

heavily on the relevance and precision of the stimuli presented. If the stimuli are
not appropriately designed, the results may be inconclusive or misleading.

CHAPTER 08
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
8.1. BRAIN FINGERPRINTING
Brain Fingerprinting is a neurotechnology designed to detect recognition of

specific information by measuring brainwave responses, with applications in criminal
justice, counterterrorism, and national security. However, it raises several ethical
concerns
8.1.1. INFORMED CONSENT
The complexity of the technology makes it challenging for individuals to fully

understand the procedure. Coercion or pressure, especially in legal contexts, may result in
consent that is not genuinely voluntary.
8.1.2. PRIVACY AND DATA SECURITY
Brain Fingerprinting delves into personal cognitive data, raising privacy concerns.
The storage, handling, and potential misuse of this data could lead to significant privacy
violations.
8.1.3. ACCURACY AND RELIABILITY
False positives or negatives may occur, leading to wrongful convictions or

misjudgments. The ethical dilemma lies in relying on technology that may not
consistently differentiate between guilt and innocence.
8.1.4. PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT
The process may induce stress, anxiety, or fear in subjects, especially if they believe
their thoughts are being exposed. Individuals with psychological conditions may
experience additional harm.

8.1.5. CULTURAL AND SOCIETAL IMPLICATIONS
Acceptance of Brain Fingerprinting varies across societies, leading to ethical

challenges in global application, with concerns about human rights violations in certain
legal or cultural frameworks.

CHAPTER 09
FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS
 Technological Advancements: Ongoing improvements in brain imaging (like

fMRI, PET scans) and EEG (Electroencephalography) make it possible to gather
more precise and real-time data on brain activity. These advancements may
enhance our understanding of cognitive processes such as memory, perception,
and decision-making, which are often relevant in legal settings.
 Legal System Adoption: As technology advances, there is increasing interest in

applying neuroimaging and EEG data in legal contexts. This might involve using
brain scans to assess truthfulness, mental states, or even criminal intent, raising
ethical and legal questions about the admissibility of such evidence.
 Integration with AI: AI can be integrated with neuroimaging and EEG

technologies to analyze large datasets, recognize patterns, and make predictions.
In a legal context, AI could help refine the selection of stimuli in experiments
(e.g., in lie detection or emotional state assessment) or enhance the interpretation
of brain data for court use.
 Global Variations: The application of neuroimaging and EEG in legal contexts

varies globally. Some countries may be more open to using such technology in
courtrooms, while others may be hesitant due to concerns about privacy, ethical
implications, or the accuracy of the data.

CHAPTER 10
INTEGRATION WITH AI
 Enhanced Data Analysis: AI algorithms, especially machine learning models,

excel at detecting complex patterns in large datasets. When applied to brainwave
data (EEG), AI can identify subtle, non-obvious trends or signatures associated
with cognitive or emotional states. This enhanced capability allows for a more
nuanced understanding of mental processes like attention, memory recall, or
deception, which is especially useful in legal or clinical contexts.
 Real-Time Processing: The integration of AI can dramatically reduce the time

needed to process brainwave data. Instead of analyzing data post-hoc, AI systems
can process EEG signals in real-time, offering immediate feedback. This is
particularly valuable in scenarios like real-time mental state monitoring (e.g., in
court, interrogations, or therapeutic sessions) where timely insights are crucial.
 Advanced Stimuli Selection: AI can optimize the selection of stimuli (images,

questions, sounds) presented during brainwave recording sessions. By
dynamically adjusting stimuli based on an individual's responses, AI can tailor the
process to enhance accuracy, whether in a legal context (like detecting deception
or memory recall) or in cognitive assessments. This customization improves the
relevance and effectiveness of the data collected, leading to better outcomes in
applications like lie detection, cognitive tests, or even therapeutic interventions.

CHAPTER 11
CONCLUSION
Brain Fingerprinting is a scientific technology designed to solve crimes, identify

perpetrators, and exonerate innocent suspects, claiming 100% accuracy in research with
US government agencies and real criminal cases. It addresses the needs of law
enforcement, corporations, and crime victims by focusing on suspects with verifiable
knowledge of crimes, potentially reducing costs related to wrongful investigations. The
technology is based on brain MERMER testing, though current findings are limited by
small sample sizes. Beyond criminal justice, Brain Fingerprinting shows potential in
measuring the effects of medications on Alzheimer's patients, evaluating advertising
effectiveness, and identifying early signs of mental disorders in teenagers for early
intervention

CHAPTER 12
REFERENCES
[1]. Farwell LA, don chin E. The brain detector: P300 in the detection of deception.
Psychophysiology 1986; 24:434.
[2]. Farwell LA, don chin E. The truth will out: interrogative polygraphy (lie
detection) with event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology 1991; 28:531-
541.
[3]. Farwell LA, inventor. Method and apparatus for multifaceted
electroencephalographic response analysis (MERA). US patent 5,363,858. 1994
Nov 15.
[4]. Farwell LA. Two new twists on the truth detector: brain-wave detection of
occupational information. Psychophysiology 1992;29(4A): S3. 5) Farwell LA,
inventor. Method and apparatus for truth detection. US patent 5,406,956. 1995
Apr 18.
[5]. Piston TW. Handbook of electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology:
human event-related potentials. Amsterdam

Agashe 1 Seminar

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Agashe 1 Seminar

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Agashe 1 Seminar

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SEMINAR REPORT

Submitted to the State Board of Technical Education, Kerala

in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of

DIPLOMA IN COMPUTER ENGINEERING

Register No: 2201131288

DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER ENGINEERING

P.O VALAPAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT

DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER ENGINEERING

INTERNAL EXAMINER FACULTY IN CHARGE

EXTERNAL EXAMINER HEAD OF DEPARTMENT

Vision and Mission of the Department and PEO

Reg. No: 2201133188

Dept. of Computer Engineering i S.R.G.P.C Thriprayar

Brain fingerprinting is a Neurotechnology that detects hidden information in the

Dept. of Computer Engineering ii S.R.G.P.C Thriprayar

2.2.1. Stimuli Presentation 3

2.2.2. Brain Wave Measurement 3

3.1 EARLY DEVELOPMENT (1990 s) 5

3.2 EARLY APPLICATIONS (2000 s) 5

3.3 FURTHER DEVELOPMENT (2010 s) 5

3.4 CURRENT STATUS (2020 s & BEYOND) 5

4. WORKING OF BRAIN FINGERPRINTING 6

4.1 EEG AND BRAIN WAVES 6

4.1.1. Electroencephalography (EEG) 6

4.1.2. Brainwave Components 6

4.2 EQUIPMENT USED 7

4.2.1. EEG System 7

4.1.2. Stimuli Presentation System 7

5. BRAIN FINGERPRINTING PROCESS 8

5.2. BASELINE RECORDING 8

5.3. STIMULI PRESENTATION 8

Dept. of Computer Engineering iii S.R.G.P.C Thriprayar

5.4. EEG RECORDING 8

5.5. INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS 8

6.1 CRIMINAL JUSTICE 10

6.1.1. Investigative Tool 10

6.1.2. Evidence Evaluation 10

6.1.3. Screening & Security 10

6.2 COUNTER TERRORISM 11

6.2.1. Screening for Threats 11

6.2.2. Evaluating Suspects 11

6.2.3. Border Security 11

6.3.1. Neurological Diagnosis 11

6.3.2. Cognitive Function Assessment 12

6.3.3. Personalized Medicine 12

6.4 ADDITIONAL APPLICATIONS 12

7. ADVANTAGES & LIMITATIONS 14

8.1. BRAIN FINGERPRINTING 15

8.1.1. Informed Consent 15

8.1.2. Privacy And Data Security 15

8.1.3. Accuracy And Reliability 15

8.1.4. Psychological Impact 15

Dept. of Computer Engineering iv S.R.G.P.C Thriprayar

8.1.5. Cultural And Societal Implications 16

10. INTEGRATION WITH AI 18

Dept. of Computer Engineering v S.R.G.P.C Thriprayar

Fig.2.1 P300 Wave Detection Graph 3

Fig.4.1 Brainwave Pattern Diagram 6

Fig.4.2 EEG System Diagram 7

Fig. 4.3 Stimuli Presentation 7