Psychodiagnostic Lab

RIBT

Gomathi Shankar

23223021

3 MPCL A

Department of Psychology

School of Social Sciences

Christ (Deemed to be University) Delhi NCR

October-2024
 1

MPS 351N: Psychodiagnostic Lab II

Rorschach Inkblot Test

Submitted by

C H Manisha (23223032)

Submitted to

Prof. Saswati Bhattacharya

School of Humanities and Social Sciences

CHRIST (Deemed to be University)

Delhi NCR - 201003

11th October, 2024

 2

Introduction

As convoluted a being as human, it requires intricate and comprehensive inquiry into

what constitutes one’s cognition, behaviour, emotion, and self. In light of this understanding,

human personality is one of the most studied concepts in psychology. Personality theories seek

to explain the human being in all areas of life - social, personal, occupational, professional,

romantic, etc.

To delve deeper into the complexity of personality, various psychological assessments

have been developed over time to shed light on the internal workings of the mind. One such

tool is the Rorschach Inkblot Test, a projective psychological test designed to uncover

underlying thought processes, emotional functioning, and aspects of personality that might not

be easily accessible through self-report measures or direct observation. The combination of

subjective expression and objective analysis makes the Rorschach a unique instrument for

exploring the deep recesses of personality.

Despite controversies over its reliability and validity, the Rorschach Inkblot Test remains

one of the most iconic tools in clinical and forensic psychology, employed to evaluate

personality structure, uncover psychodynamic issues, and assess emotional functioning in a

wide array of settings. Whether used in therapeutic contexts to aid treatment planning or in

forensic evaluations to assess mental health, the Rorschach continues to be a window into the

complexities of human cognition and emotion, revealing dimensions of personality that are

often hidden from conscious awareness.

Personality
 3

The word ‘personality’ has been derived from the Latin word persona, often used to

refer to those masks worn by the actors of the ancient times which were representative of a

particular personality trait of any character in a play (Cherry, 2022). The concept of personality

has been viewed and defined by many different prominent figures and psychologists. For

instance, Gordon Allport, a renowned pioneer in the field of personality, believed that

"Personality is the dynamic organisation within the individual of those psychophysical systems

that determine his characteristics, behaviour and thought". According to Raymond Cattell,

“Personality is that which permits a prediction of what a person will do in a given situation”

(Cattell, 1943; as quoted in Kelland, 2020). Largely basing our understanding on the various

definitions of personality that have evolved gradually over the years, personality is now

commonly conceptualised as the configuration and combination of relatively enduring, complex,

and dynamic characteristics, traits and behaviours that constitute a person’s unique manner of

adjustment to life (American Psychological Association, n.d.)

Personality Theories

1. Psychodynamic Theories

Sigmund Freud laid the foundation for psychodynamic personality theories with his

proposal of the id, the ego, and the superego. Freud saw these three parts of the mind as the

basis of human personality.According to Freud, these concepts could explain individual

behaviour.

The id was about your irrational and emotional impulses, while the ego weighed all the

rational pros and cons. The superego then sought to apply social norms, rules, and other personal

values that ultimately encouraged you to act based on your core beliefs. Later, in the
 4

psychosexual personality development part of Freud’s theory, he explained how a person came

to those beliefs and ideals.

Freud thought early childhood experiences played the most important role in how

personality developed. Early life, he said, was defined by five psychosexual stages based on the

pleasure sensations in erogenous zones:

● oral: mouth and sucking reflexes

● anal: bladder and bowel control

● phallic: genitals and gender identification

● latency: sexuality is paused and latent, and gives room to social skills

● genital: mature sexuality and defined sexual interest and orientation Freud

suggested that each stage presented you with a developmental conflict. If you

successfully overcame it, you would move into the next phase of

development.

2. Trait theories and type theories

Trait theory is one of the most popular types of personality theories. It proposes that

people’s personalities vary according to which basic personality traits are more dominant. In

this sense, each trait is seen as a continuum.

Trait Theory

Trait theory focuses on identifying and measuring individual personality

characteristics, or traits. Traits are considered to be consistent over time and across different
 5

situations, making them reliable indicators of personality. Example: The Big Five Personality

Traits

One of the most widely accepted trait theories is the Big Five model, which includes

the following five dimensions:

● Openness to Experience: This trait features characteristics such as imagination,

creativity, and curiosity. Individuals high in openness are more likely to seek out new

experiences and be open to unconventional ideas.

● Conscientiousness: This trait includes high levels of thoughtfulness, good impulse

control, and goal-directed behaviours. Highly conscientious individuals are organised,

mindful of details, and reliable.

● Extraversion: This trait is characterised by excitability, sociability, talkativeness,

assertiveness, and high amounts of emotional expressiveness. Extraverts are outgoing

and gain energy from interacting with others.

● Agreeableness: This trait includes attributes such as trust, altruism, kindness, and

affection. People high in agreeableness tend to be more cooperative and compassionate

towards others.

● Neuroticism: This trait is characterised by sadness, moodiness, and emotional

instability. Individuals high in neuroticism experience mood swings, anxiety, irritability, and

sadness. Type Theory

Type theory classifies people into distinct personality types based on certain

characteristics. Unlike traits, which are measured on a continuum, types categorise individuals

into discrete groups. Example: Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)

 6

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is a well-known type theory that

categorises individuals into 16 personality types based on four dichotomies:

● Extraversion (E) vs. Introversion (I): This dichotomy describes where individuals get

their energy. Extraverts gain energy from social interactions, while introverts recharge

through solitude.

● Sensing (S) vs. Intuition (N): This dichotomy involves how individuals process

information. Sensors focus on concrete, factual information, while intuitives look at

patterns and possibilities.

● Thinking (T) vs. Feeling (F): This dichotomy relates to decision-making processes.

Thinkers base decisions on logic and objective criteria, whereas feelers make decisions

based on personal values and how they affect others.

● Judging (J) vs. Perceiving (P): This dichotomy describes individuals' approach to the

external world. Judgers prefer structure and order, making plans and sticking to them,

while perceivers are more flexible and spontaneous.

Each person falls into one of the 16 personality types based on their preferences in these

four areas, such as ISTJ (Introverted, Sensing, Thinking, Judging) or ENFP (Extraverted,

Intuitive, Feeling, Perceiving).

3. Humanistic theories

The humanistic approach to theories of personality involves understanding not only

behavior and thought patterns, but also what someone believes gives their life meaning.

Humanistic theories propose that someone’s personality depends heavily on what they think of

themselves — who they believe they are. Maslow’shumanistic hierarchy of needs, for
 7

example, suggested that personality is the result of someone being able to meet — or not meet

— basic needs like safety, self-esteem, and belongingness.

4. Social cognitive theories

Social cognitive theories of personality include several schools of thought

like behaviourism, social learning theory, and expectancy-value theory.

Behaviorism

Behaviorism theory proposes that human behaviour is the direct result of facing

rewards and punishments.

In other words, you’re conditioned to respond a certain way because of a

reward-punishment pattern in your life.

Social learning theory

Closely related to behaviorism is Albert Bandura social learning theory, which takes

behavioral models and adds the component of thought. In other words, the theory proposes that

your thought process plays an essential part in deciding if you should imitate or not a certain

behavior (learning).

According to the social learning theory , how you perceive behavioral reinforcement is

more important than the reinforcement itself.

Expectancy-value theory

Another behaviorism-based model of human personality is the Julian framework. Rotter

proposed human behavior is motivated by the expected rewards or punishment it can gain. This

expectation comes from past experiences and whether or not you thought the consequences of

your actions were under your control.

 8

When someone believes they have control over an outcome, they’re more motivated to

action. This is particularly so when they anticipate a positive outcome because similar actions

have been rewarded in the past.

5. Biological theories

Biological personality theories assert that brain structures and neurophysiology are what

determine your personality traits.In other words, something as simple as higher

neurotransmitter levels might provide you with a more positive outlook, for example, than

someone else.

6. Evolutionary theories

Charles Darwin first introduced the concepts of evolution and natural selection in the

mid-1800s. His work sparked an entire field of evolutionary biology. Later, other scientists

explored Darwin’s premises to explain human behavior. According to this framework of

evolutionary theories, human personality is primarily the result of genes and most useful traits.

Ultimately, evolutionary theory states that personality characteristics that increased your

ancestors’ chances for survival are the traits you may have at the core of your personality today.

Personality Assessment

Personality assessment in psychology is a sophisticated field dedicated to

understanding and quantifying the diverse range of traits and characteristics that define

individual behaviour across various contexts. This process involves systematic measurement

and evaluation to

uncover underlying psychological constructs that influence how individuals think, feel, and act.

The objective is to capture both normal and abnormal personality traits, providing valuable
 9

insights across different domains such as clinical psychology, neuropsychology,

industrial-organisational psychology, and forensic psychology. By analysing these traits,

psychologists can make informed decisions regarding diagnosis, treatment planning, and

personnel selection, ultimately enhancing our understanding of human behaviour and

improving decision-making in various applied settings.

Personality assessment is grounded in several theoretical frameworks that guide the

measurement and interpretation of personality traits. Notable theories include the Big Five

model, which evaluates individuals across five broad dimensions: extraversion, emotional

stability, conscientiousness, agreeableness, and openness to experience, and social-cognitive

theory, which emphasises the interaction between cognitive and affective processes and

contextual factors. These theories underpin the primary divisions of personality assessment

methods: objective tests, semi-projective tests, and projective tests. Each category employs

distinct methodologies to capture different facets of personality, contributing to a

comprehensive understanding of individual differences.

Objective tests are characterised by their structured nature and reliance on

standardised questions and scoring systems. Examples include the Minnesota Multiphasic

Personality Inventory (MMPI), which assesses a broad range of psychological conditions

such as schizophrenia, depression, and anxiety disorders through true/false questions. The Big

Five Inventory (BFI) measures traits based on the Five-Factor Model, offering insights into

personality dimensions that can relate to conditions like borderline personality disorder and

narcissistic personality disorder. These tests provide quantifiable data, allowing for precise
 10

measurement of specific personality traits and facilitating comparisons across individuals

and groups.

Semi-projective tests offer a blend of structured elements and interpretive latitude, providing

nuanced insights into personality. The Rotter Incomplete Sentences Blank (RISB) presents

incomplete sentences for individuals to finish, revealing their thoughts, feelings, and

attitudes, and can be useful in identifying disorders such as depressive disorders or anxiety

disorders. Similarly, the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT), though often classified as

projective, combines structured prompts with interpretive freedom, requiring individuals to

create stories about ambiguous images. This can uncover underlying needs and conflicts that

may relate to disorders such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or personality

disorders.

Projective tests utilise ambiguous stimuli to elicit responses believed to reveal deeper,

often unconscious aspects of personality. The Rorschach Inkblot Test, for instance, involves

interpreting a series of inkblot images to gain insights into thought processes, emotions, and

interpersonal relationships, and can be used to explore disorders such as schizophrenia or

bipolar disorder. The Draw-A-Person Test, where participants draw a person and analyse the

details, can indicate psychological issues and personality traits related to self-perception and

emotional functioning, potentially identifying conditions like self-esteem issues or emotional

disorders. Each type of test contributes uniquely to the overall assessment process, allowing

psychologists to explore both surface-level behaviours and deeper psychological dimensions.

Projective Hypothesis
 11

Projective tests are grounded in the hypothesis that individuals will project their internal

conflicts, needs, desires, emotions, and thoughts onto ambiguous stimuli. This approach operates

on the premise that, when presented with vague or unstructured prompts—such as inkblots,

incomplete sentences, or images depicting interpersonal situations—individuals will

unconsciously express underlying psychological content. Such projected material is believed to

reveal latent aspects of the individual's psyche, including emotional conflicts and desires, which

may not be easily accessible through more structured or direct assessment methods.

Unlike norm-referenced assessments, projective tests place greater emphasis on the clinician's

interpretive skills rather than standardised scoring procedures. Due to their subjective nature

and the reliance on clinician interpretation, projective tests are typically considered

supplementary tools in psychological assessment and are rarely used in isolation for diagnostic

purposes.They are typically combined with interviews and more objective methods to inform

clinical decisions.

Types of Projective Tests

Projective tests inculcate various techniques designed to elicit unconscious thoughts,

emotions, and conflicts through responses to ambiguous stimuli. Common types of

projective tests include:

1. Rorschach Inkblot Test: This test involves presenting individuals with a series of

inkblots, asking them to describe what they see. The responses are analysed to

gain insights into the individual’s personality, emotional functioning, and

underlying psychological issues.

 12

2. Thematic Apperception Test (TAT): In this test, individuals are shown a series of

pictures depicting people in ambiguous situations and asked to create a story about

what is happening in the image. The content and themes of these stories are interpreted

to explore the individual’s thoughts, motivations, and interpersonal dynamics.

3. Sentence Completion Tests: Participants are asked to complete a series of incomplete

sentences, such as "I feel most anxious when..." or "My mother is...". The responses

can reveal hidden emotions, conflicts, and personality traits based on recurring themes

or patterns.

4. Draw-a-Person Test (DAP): In this test, individuals are instructed to draw a person. The

characteristics of the drawing, such as proportions, details, and overall representation, are

analysed to understand the person’s self-concept, emotional state, and possible

underlying conflicts.

5. House-Tree-Person (HTP) Test: Participants are asked to draw a house, a tree, and a

person. The interpretation of these drawings considers various factors, such as size,

detail, and placement, to uncover information about the individual’s relationships,

emotional state, and psychological functioning.

6. Children’s Apperception Test (CAT): Similar to the TAT, the CAT is designed for

children and uses images of animals in social situations. Children are asked to tell

stories about the pictures, allowing clinicians to explore their cognitive and emotional

development, as well as any conflicts or anxieties they may be experiencing. These tests

provide a window into unconscious aspects of personality but require skilled

 13

interpretation and are typically used alongside other diagnostic tools for comprehensive

assessment.

Rorschach Inkblot Test

The Rorschach Inkblot Test is a projective psychological assessment that plays a crucial

role in identifying psychopathology by revealing unconscious processes, thought patterns, and

emotional functioning. It works by presenting individuals with a series of ambiguous inkblots,

prompting them to project their inner thoughts and feelings onto these stimuli. This allows

clinicians to assess cognitive distortions, disorganised thinking, and reality-testing issues,

which are often indicative of severe mental health conditions like schizophrenia, personality

disorders, and psychosis.

Developed by Swiss Psychiatrist, Hermann Rorshach in 1921, takes into account the

subject’s perception of the inkblots which are then recorded and the assessor analyses those

responses using psychological interpretations, algorithms, or both. The test includes 10 inkblot

cards with five of them being black and white and two being black,white, and red, while the

last three are multicoloured.

Through the analysis of responses, the Rorschach Test helps uncover underlying emotional

disturbances, maladaptive coping mechanisms, and interpersonal difficulties. For example,

responses that deviate significantly from reality or show bizarre content can suggest perceptual

distortions or delusional thinking. Similarly, how an individual perceives and relates to the

inkblots may provide insights into their self-concept, emotional regulation, and

interpersonal relationships, all of which are vital in diagnosing and understanding various

forms of psychopathology. The responses of the test are used as a springboard for further
 14

discussions regarding the patient’s mental health and possible disorders. Additionally,

employers may sometimes use these inkblots to measure people’s creativity, intelligence, and

temperament.

Purpose of Rorschach Inkblot Test

The Rorschach Inkblot Test serves multiple purposes in psychological and clinical

settings. It is particularly effective in helping psychiatrists establish clinical diagnoses by

uncovering underlying thought processes and emotional states that may not be easily accessible

through other assessments. Its unique ability to assess individuals in situations where limited

background information is available, such as in cases of behavioural or conduct problems,

makes it a valuable tool. Additionally, it is often used in re-employment evaluations and

investigations involving suspects in criminal activities, offering insights into an individual's

psychological makeup. The test's preference over other assessments stems from its wide

applicability, limited potential for faking responses, and its holistic approach to understanding

personality. It excels in exploring subconscious conflicts and can provide a more dependable

and comprehensive evaluation of mental states. Furthermore, its predictive value in assessing

future behaviours or mental health issues adds to its utility in clinical practice.

The Rorschach Inkblot Test is grounded in the principle of projection, which

suggests that individuals will project their unconscious thoughts, feelings, and desires onto

ambiguous stimuli. The test uses a series of inkblots that lack inherent meaning, allowing

respondents to interpret the images based on their internal mental states. This principle is

aligned with psychoanalytic theory, particularly the idea that hidden aspects of the

personality—such as repressed emotions, desires, and conflicts—are revealed through the

 15

interpretation of ambiguous stimuli. The test taps into these unconscious processes,

providing a window into deeper psychological structures, making it useful for understanding

complex personality dynamics.

The Rorschach test is primarily used in clinical, forensic, and employment contexts.

In clinical psychology, it aids in diagnosing mental disorders, particularly in cases where

other assessments may not provide sufficient insight. It is also used in forensic settings, such

as in criminal investigations or custody disputes, where it helps assess the psychological state

of suspects or litigants. Additionally, the test is used in employment evaluations, particularly

for positions requiring psychological resilience or decision-making under stress. Its

versatility allows it to be applied in a wide range of situations where understanding

subconscious motivations or unobservable behaviour is crucial.

History and Development

The Rorschach Inkblot Test, developed by Swiss psychiatrist Hermann Rorschach in the early

20th century, was likely inspired by the children's game "Blotto," which involved interpreting

inkblot shapes. While working with schizophrenia patients, Rorschach noticed their distinct

responses to inkblots, leading him to believe that such reactions could reveal personality traits

and psychopathology (Rorschach, 1921; 1942). His research, which began in 1917, initially

included 40 inkblots, later refined to 10 due to publishing constraints. These findings, along

with his scoring system that analysed responses based on characteristics like form and colour,

were published in Psychodiagnostik (Rorschach, 1921; 1942).

Introduction and Development in India

 16

The Rorschach test was introduced in India during the pre-independence era, with early

research focused on meaning-making processes in inkblot responses (Prasad & Asthana, 1947).

Researchers like Dosajh (1956), Jain (1956), and H.S. Asthana made significant contributions,

with Asthana developing normative data for Indian subjects and studying the test's application in

Indian cultural contexts (Asthana, 1950a; 1950b; 1965; 1971). Subsequent researchers like Ray

(1955) and Bagh (1955) expanded its use to various populations, including tribal groups and

adolescents. The clinical relevance of the Rorschach test was further supported by S.K. Verma

and D. Pershad (Bhargava & Saxena, 1995), and it continues to be a core part of clinical

psychology training in India, particularly at NIMHANS (Shukla, 1977).

Versions of Rorschach Inkblot Test

The Rorschach Inkblot Test, developed by Hermann Rorschach in 1921, is a projective

psychological assessment tool used to uncover underlying thought processes and personality

traits. Initially qualitative and subjective, the test consists of 10 inkblots presented to subjects

for interpretation. Over time, various scoring systems were developed to enhance its reliability

and validity. Notable among these is Exner's Comprehensive System (1974), which introduced a

standardised method for scoring responses, addressing concerns about reliability. Earlier

systems, like those by Klöpfer, Beck, and Piotrowski, emphasised psychoanalytic interpretation,

content analysis, and cognitive processes, respectively, but lacked the structure introduced by

Exner. More recently, the Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS) (2011)

modernised the test by improving its psychometric properties, streamlining coding categories,

and introducing international norms, making it more applicable across cultures and enhancing
 17

its scientific rigour. Despite its evolution, the test remains subject to ongoing research and

debate regarding its relevance and effectiveness in contemporary psychological practice.

Psychometric Properties

Reliability

There has long been controversy surrounding the reliability and validity of the

Rorschach inkblot test's scores (Mihura & Meyer, 2015). The Rorschach Inkblot Test has

problems with norms, cultural sensitivity, interrater reliability, test-retest reliability, validity,

factor structure, and accessibility of supporting studies (Wood & Lilienfeld, 1999). But, contrary

to what is observed by these academicians, the Exner interpretation of rorschach has abundant

contemporary data demonstrating its psychometric soundness and practical utility for assessing

personality functioning. The test-retest reliability ranges from 0.70 to 0.80 in periods of time

from 7 days to 3 years (Exner & Weiner, 1995). While some variables, such as "Form Quality,"

show moderate reliability (.70 to .80), other aspects, such as response frequency, are less

consistent (Mihura et al., 2013). Internal consistency, typically low for projective tests, is also

moderate in the Rorschach due to its focus on capturing multi-dimensional personality traits

rather than single constructs (Weiner, 2003). The Rorschach Inkblot Test remains a valid and

unique assessment of personality and psychological processes, with improvements in the R-PAS

system (Yu & Lee, 2021).

Validity

The Rorschach Inkblot Test has been standardised, normed, and validated, showing

comparable validity effect sizes to the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)

(Bornstein, 2012). Careful attention to methodological issues is crucial in evaluating Rorschach

 18

validity, as incorrect conclusions may occur if not evaluated carefully. The results of a

meta-analysis of Rorschach studies indicate that reliabilities in the order of .83 and higher and

validity coefficients of .45 or .50 and higher can be expected for the Rorschach--when

hypotheses supported by empirical or theoretical rationales are tested using reasonably powerful

statistics (Parker, 1983). In terms of predictive validity, which assesses the test's ability to

predict future behaviour, the Rorschach shows moderate validity in identifying individuals with

thought disorders but is less consistent in other diagnostic applications (Mihura et al., 2013).

Concurrent validity, which evaluates the degree to which the Rorschach correlates with other

established personality tests like the MMPI, has shown moderate correlations, particularly in the

domain of thought disorder assessments (Meyer et al., 2001; Yu & Lee, 2021).

Description of the Cards

The Rorschach inkblot test comprises 10 distinct cards, each designed to elicit a range of

interpretations that reveal aspects of an individual's personality and emotional functioning.

Among these cards, five are achromatic (black and white), two are achromatic with red blots

(black with red), and three are fully chromatic, featuring vibrant colours. The careful selection of

these inkblots allows for a diverse exploration of human thought and emotion. Achromatic cards

tend to provoke more straightforward and structured responses, while chromatic cards often

elicit richer, more emotionally nuanced interpretations. This combination is intended to provide

a comprehensive view of the respondent's inner world, offering valuable insights for

psychological assessment and therapy

Methodology

Materials Required
 19

1. Rorschach Inkblot Cards

2. Schemablock

3. Response, Inquiry, Location sheet

4. Structural Summary Sheet

5. Manual or Scoring Guide (e.g., Exner Comprehensive System)

6. Pens

Preliminary setup

For a smooth administration of the Rorschach Inkblot Test, it is essential to establish a

well-structured preliminary setup. The test should be conducted in a quiet, private, and well-lit

environment to minimise distractions and promote the participant’s focus and engagement.

Comfortable seating arrangements are important, with the examiner and participant facing each

other across a table. The 10 Rorschach inkblot cards must be organised in the correct sequence

for presentation, while response sheets should be prepared to accurately record the participant’s

verbatim responses. Additionally, scoring sheets, location charts, and the inquiry sheet should

be readily accessible for efficient administration and interpretation. Clear, neutral instructions

must be communicated to the participant, emphasising that there are no right or wrong answers.

This careful preparation ensures that the test is conducted consistently and adheres to

established protocols.

Procedure

There are six phases involved Rorschach inkblot test:

● Arrangement

● Instructions
 20

● Free association

● Inquiry

● Scoring

● Interpretation and Report writing

Arrangement

It involves setting up the quiet and comfortable environment, materials, and procedures

to ensure that the test is administered properly. The 10 inkblot cards are kept face down on the

table in the correct sequence before the test begins, ensuring the respondent does not see them

beforehand. The examiner also prepares materials to note not only the content of the response,

but also any notable non-verbal behaviours or delays.

Instructions

Basic instructions should be explained clearly. The following instructions are given to

the client:

"I have a pack of ten cards. These cards are just a series of inkblots. I will show you these

cards one by one and you are supposed to tell me what they look like to you. Different people

see different sorts of things in these cards. Usually, people see many things in each card. Tell

me all about what you can see in each card."

Free association

● Hand over card number one, holding it from the upper middle part and encouraging the

subject to take it in both hands.

● Simultaneously start the stopwatch. Record the responses of the subject, note down every

detail without interruption.

 21

● Responses have to be recorded verbatim, leaving large space between responses.

● Record all card turning.

● Note down the position of the card in which a response was given.

● Do not snatch the card, even if the subject is unable to see any other thing.

● Finish the work of recording responses on all the 10 cards.

Inquiry Phase

Inquiry phase begins only after recording all the responses in the free association

stage. This phase includes answering two major questions by the subject and simultaneously

marking them with colourful pens as they indicate. The following are the questions to be

asked:

● Where on the card did you see this response?

● Explain what you see so that I can see it like you saw it.

Scoring and Coding

For analysing the responses, codes are given to specific categories including:

● Location and Developmental Quality

● Determinants

● Form Quality

● Contents

● Popular Responses

● Organizational Activity (Z-score)

● Special Scores

Interpretation and Report writing

 22

In this phase, the examiner translates the scored data into meaningful psychological

insights. This begins with compiling a structural summary that consolidates key variables from

the scoring phase. The examiner then analyses these variables to assess cognitive patterns,

emotional responsiveness, and interpersonal behaviour. Personality traits, coping mechanisms,

and possible psychological conflicts are also inferred from the responses.

Finally, the examiner writes a report, summarising key findings, providing an

interpretation of the individual’s personality, and offering clinical recommendations, which

gives an overall psychological profile, highlighting significant traits and potential areas for

therapeutic intervention.

Precautions

The following precautions should be taken during the investigation to facilitate

its smooth conduction:

● Rapport should be established prior to the administration to ensure prompt cooperation and

comfort for the participant.

● Informed consent should be taken and the participant should be informed about the tenets of

confidentiality and the limitations of the same.

● All external disturbances should be minimised to ensure that the subject’s attention and

concentration is sustained and maintained throughout the administration.

● The assessment should be conducted in a single sitting.

● The investigator should ensure that the subject feels comfortable and at

ease.

Applications
 23

● Assessment of Psychopathy in Forensic Populations. The Rorschach Inkblot Test has

been used to discriminate between psychopaths and non-psychopaths in forensic

settings, although its sensitivity and validity in this context are debated (Wood et al,

2010)

● Evaluation of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The test is employed to assess

post-traumatic conditions, including PTSD, by examining cognitive constriction,

trauma-related imagery, cognitive disturbances, stress responses, and dissociation

(Viglione et al., 2012).

● Personality Assessment and Clinical Utility. The Rorschach is valued for its ability to

reveal a person's level of energy, emotional control, and thought processes, which are

not easily assessed by other tests (Choca, 2012; Schwartz, 2014). It is used to provide

valid assessments of personality characteristics, aiding in differential diagnosis,

treatment planning, and evaluation (Weiner, 1997).

● Existential and Psychoanalytic Interpretations. The test can be interpreted from an

existential perspective, particularly useful in understanding the mental state of

individuals facing life-threatening illnesses, such as cancer or HIV (Ergin & Set, 2019)

Scoring and Coding

The Rorschach inkblot test utilises several scoring systems to analyse responses, with

three of the most prominent being the Exner Comprehensive System, the Klopfer System,

and the Rorschach Performance Assessment System (RPAS).

Exner Comprehensive System: This is the most widely used scoring system for the

Rorschach test. Developed by John E. Exner, it integrates various components such as

 24

response location, content, determinants, and form quality. The Exner system provides a

standardised approach for scoring and interpreting responses, allowing for the comparison of

results against normative data, which enhances the reliability and validity of the findings.

Klopfer System: Developed by the original proponent of the Rorschach test, Hermann

Rorschach, and later expanded by Samuel Klopfer, this system focuses on a detailed analysis of

the responses, emphasising the psychological significance of themes and content. While it is

less commonly used today, it laid the groundwork for subsequent systems and offers valuable

insights into personality dynamics.

Rorschach Performance Assessment System (RPAS): This modern system, developed

by Gregory J. Meyer and colleagues, integrates principles of performance assessment with

Rorschach methodology. It emphasises the interaction between the individual and the testing

environment, allowing for a nuanced understanding of personality and functioning. RPAS

focuses on contextual and relational aspects, aiming to provide a more comprehensive view of

an individual’s psychological profile.

In 1973, Exner published the first edition of The Rorschach: A Comprehensive System laying

out the new scoring system. Exner broke down how a person responds to an inkblot into three

primary phases. In phase 1, the person looks at the card while their brain encodes the stimulus

(inkblot) and all its parts then classifies the stimulus and its parts. In phase 2, the person discards

potential answers that aren't ranked well, and censors other responses they think may be

inappropriate. In phase 3, they select some of the remaining responses by reason or traits, styles,

or other influences. In Rorschach's original work (1969), four basic dimensions within each

response were noted: mode of apperception (location and derived scores) form, movement and
 25

colour (later called determinants); content; and noting of original answers (later expanded to

include noting popular responses and other qualitative observations). Beck (1933) introduced

the notion of an additional dimension, organisational activity. Hence, the five basic dimensions

can be designated: location, organisation, determinants, content, and qualitative observations

26

I. Location and Developmental quality

This dimension focuses on where the respondent locates their

interpretation within the inkblot. Responses can be classified as:

- Whole Responses (W): The individual perceives the entire inkblot as a single

object or concept. This often indicates a holistic approach to perception and

can suggest a more integrated personality.

- CommonDetail Response (D): A frequently identified area of the blot -

Unusual Detail Response (Dd): An infrequently identified area of the blot -

Space Response: A white space area is used in the response (scored only with

another location symbol, i.e, WS, DS OR DdS)

Developmental quality refers to the complexity and clarity of the responses given by

individuals. This dimension helps clinicians understand how effectively a person processes

information and organises their thoughts, which can be indicative of cognitive and

emotional maturity.

- Synthesised Response (+): Clear and coherent interpretations that integrate multiple

elements, indicating high cognitive functioning and emotional maturity. These

responses reflect creativity and nuanced thinking.

 26

- Ordinary Response (o): Straightforward and recognizable interpretations that are easily

understood but may lack depth. While they demonstrate functional cognitive

processing, they don't showcase the same level of insight as synthesised responses.

- Vague Synthesised Response (v/+): Attempts to connect ideas but with less clarity and

specificity. These responses indicate some cognitive engagement but suggest

difficulties in articulating thoughts

- Vague Response (v): Ambiguous and poorly articulated interpretations that reflect

minimal cognitive processing. Vague responses may suggest confusion or

emotional distress, indicating challenges in expressing thoughts and feelings.

II. Determinants

Determinants refer to the aspects of the inkblots that influence an individual's

responses. They provide insight into the psychological processes underlying the

interpretations and can reveal emotional states, cognitive patterns, and personality

traits. Below are the various types of determinants categorised based on their

characteristics:

Form Responses

Form Answer: This indicates that the response closely matches the actual shape

of the inkblot. High-quality form responses reflect accurate perception and cognitive

organisation

Movement responses

Human Movement Response: These responses suggest action or motion related to human

figures. They can indicate social interactions, vitality, or emotional engagement with others.
 27

Animal Movement Response: These refer to interpretations involving movement

associated with animals, reflecting instinctual or primal emotions and dynamics in

relationships.

Inanimate Movement Response: Responses that suggest action or movement in inanimate

objects. This can reveal how an individual perceives their environment and may indicate feelings

of chaos or disorder

Colour Responses

Pure Colour Response: Responses that emphasise colour without reference to

form. These often reflect strong emotions and can indicate the individual's emotional state.

Colour-Form Response: Interpretations that combine both colour and form aspects.

These responses may reflect emotional responses that are influenced by how the form is

perceived.

Form-Colour Response: Here, the emphasis is on the form first, with colour playing

a secondary role. This can suggest a more structured approach to interpretation.

Colour Naming Response: This involves explicitly naming colours in the responses, which can

indicate the respondent's awareness and emotional associations with specific colours

Pure Achromatic Colour Response: Responses focusing on shades of grey or black

and white, indicating emotional neutrality or complexity in perception.

Achromatic Color-Form Response: These involve both achromatic colours and

shapes, suggesting a blend of emotional and perceptual elements.

Form-Achromatic Color Response: Emphasising the form with achromatic

elements, indicating a perception that is more structured and perhaps less emotionally.
 28

Texture Responses

Pure Texture Response: Responses that emphasise the perceived texture of the inkblot,

revealing sensitivities or emotional states related to tactile experiences Texture-Form Response:

These involve interpretations that incorporate both texture and shape, reflecting a more

nuanced understanding of the inkblot Form-Texture Response: Here, the form is primary, with

texture being secondary, indicating a more structured cognitive approach.

Vista Responses

Pure Vista Response: Responses that interpret the inkblot as a landscape or

scene, suggesting a broader perspective on the individual’s worldview or emotional

landscape.

Vista-Form Response: Interpretations that combine landscape elements with form,

indicating how the individual integrates their perception of the environment with their

emotional state.

Form-Vista Response: Primarily form-based responses that include an element of

vista, reflecting a structured yet expansive perception.

Shading Responses

Pure Shading Response: Responses focusing on the use of light and shadow in

the inkblot, which can indicate the depth of perception and emotional nuances.

Shading-Form Response: Combining shading with form, reflecting how

individuals perceive both structure and dimensionality in their emotional responses.

Form-Shading Response: Here, the form is emphasised while shading is

secondary, indicating a more concrete approach to perception.

 29

Dimensional Responses

Form-Based Dimensional Response: These responses focus on the

three-dimensional aspects of the inkblot, suggesting cognitive complexity and the ability to

perceive depth.

Pairs & Reflections

The Pair Response: Interpretations that involve two elements or figures,

reflecting interpersonal dynamics or relationships.

Reflection-Form Response: Responses that incorporate reflective aspects (e.g.,

mirror-like qualities) along with form, indicating self-awareness or introspection.

Form-Reflection Response: Here, the form is emphasised with reflective qualities

as secondary, suggesting structured yet introspective thought processes.

III. Content

Content categorises the themes or objects that the individual identifies in

the inkblots. It includes:

Whole Human: When the subject identifies a complete human figure in

the inkblot.

Whole Human (Fictional/Mythological): A response involving a

complete human figure from fiction or mythology, such as a superhero or a god.

Human Detail: Recognition of a specific part of a human, like a hand, head,

or foot.

Human Detail (Fictional/Mythological): A response that focuses on a part of

a fictional or mythological human figure, like the wings of an angel.

 30

Human Experience: When the subject interprets the inkblot as

representing human emotions or actions, like dancing or fighting.

Whole Animal: Seeing an entire animal figure in the inkblot, like a dog or

bird.

Whole Animal (Fictional/Mythological): Recognition of a whole animal

figure from myth or fiction, such as a dragon or unicorn.

Animal Detail: This refers to when a subject identifies a specific part of an

animal in the Rorschach inkblot, such as a paw, tail, wing, or beak, without

recognizing the entire animal. The focus is on a singular part rather than the whole

creature.

Animal Detail (Fictional or Mythological): This occurs when a subject

identifies a part of a fictional or mythological animal, such as a dragon's wing, a

unicorn's horn, or a phoenix's feathers. The emphasis is on recognizing a distinct part of

an imaginary or legendary animal.

Anatomy: Responses related to internal body structures, such as bones or

organs.

Art: When the subject interprets the inkblot as resembling an artistic object

or style, like a painting or sculpture.

Anthropology: Responses that reference human culture or history, like

tribal figures or ancient artefacts.

Blood: When blood or bleeding is identified in the inkblot image.

 31

Botany: Responses involving plant life, like trees, flowers, or leaves.

Clothing: Recognition of garments or accessories, such as a hat or dress.

Clouds: When the subject sees cloud shapes or sky phenomena in the

inkblot.

Explosion: Seeing an explosion or something destructive in the inkblot, like

fire or a blast.

Fire: Interpreting the inkblot as flames, fire, or burning.

Food: Identifying objects related to food, like fruits, vegetables, or

meals.

Geography: When the inkblot is interpreted as a geographic feature,

like mountains or rivers.

Household: Responses involving common household items, such as furniture

or utensils.

Landscape: Identifying outdoor scenes, like forests, hills, or

beaches.

Nature: A general category where the inkblot is seen as something from

the natural world, like water, animals, or plants.

Science: Responses linked to scientific objects or concepts, such as

laboratory equipment or chemical reactions.

Sex: When the subject interprets the inkblot as depicting sexual imagery

or organs.
 32

X-ray: Seeing internal views or structures, as if viewing the inkblot through

an X-ray.

IV. Organisational Activity

Organisational activity refers to how individuals structure and integrate their

responses to the inkblots. This aspect of scoring provides insights into cognitive

processes, emotional functioning, and personality characteristics. The organisational

activity can be evaluated through various metrics, including the Z scores, which

assess different dimensions of response organisation.

Z Scores in Organisational Activity

ZW (Zscore for Whole Responses): This score reflects the proportion of whole responses

concerning the total number of responses given. A higher ZW score indicates that the

individual is more likely to perceive the inkblots as complete figures rather than fragments.

This can suggest a more integrated cognitive style and a tendency to see the big picture, often

associated with higher cognitive functioning and emotional stability.

ZA (Zscore for Average Responses): The ZA score assesses the average number of

responses provided. It reflects the overall quantity of responses in relation to what is expected

of a normative population. A balanced ZA score suggests that the individual engages

thoughtfully with the inkblots, demonstrating a typical level of responsiveness. Extremely high

or low ZA scores may indicate either over-engagement (potentially reflecting anxiety or

overactivity) or under-engagement (possibly suggesting avoidance or emotional withdrawal).

ZS (Z score for Specific Responses): This score pertains to the specific content of the

responses, focusing on how diverse and varied the interpretations are. A high ZS score indicates
 33

a rich array of different responses, suggesting flexibility in thinking and creativity. Conversely,

a low ZS score may suggest rigid or limited thinking patterns, potentially indicating difficulties

in processing complex emotions or ideas.

ZD (Z Score for Determinants): The ZD score reflects the use of determinants (such as

colour, movement, and form) in responses. A higher ZD score indicates that the individual uses

a broader range of determinants, suggesting more complex and nuanced perceptions. This can

reflect higher cognitive engagement and emotional depth. In contrast, a low ZD score may

indicate simpler or more concrete thinking patterns, potentially signaling emotional flatness or

lack of engagement with deeper emotional content

V. Qualitative Observations

This dimension encompasses additional observations about the quality

and emotional tone of the responses. It includes

Emotional Tone: The overall mood conveyed by the responses can indicate

the respondent's emotional state, such as optimism, anxiety, or hostility.

Intrapsychic Dynamics: Qualitative observations can reveal internal conflicts,

defense mechanisms, and coping styles. Excessive negativity in responses may point

to underlying distress or maladaptive coping strategies.

Use of Symbolism: The presence of metaphorical or symbolic interpretations

can provide insight into the individual's deeper thoughts and feelings, highlighting how

they process complex emotional experiences.

Special Scores
 34

In the Rorschach Inkblot Test, special scores capture unusual thinking

patterns, added after the Comprehensive System was first published When the

Comprehensive System for the Rorschach Test was first published by John Exner in

the 1970s, special scores like DV, DR, INCOM, FABCOM, and CONTAM were not

included. The initial focus was on formalising the scoring process for content and

location. These special scores were later added to better capture cognitive

disturbances, thought disorders, and subtle deviations in verbal and conceptual

thinking. Key scores include:

Deviant Verbalisations

Deviant Verbalizations (DV): Language misuse.

- DV1: Minor language misuse, meaning is still clear

- DV2: Severe misuse, meaning is lost or nonsensical

Deviant Responses (DR): Irrelevant or illogical responses

- DR1: Mild drifting or irrelevant comments

- DR2: Severe, tangential responses unrelated to the inkblot

Inappropriate Combinations

- Incongruous Combinations (INCOM): Combining elements that don't logically belong

together (e.g., "fish flying through a tree")

- Fabulized Combinations (FABCOM): Extreme INCOM, combining objects in

impossible ways (e.g., "a dog with butterfly wings").

- Contamination (CONTAM): Blending two objects into one, making them

indistinguishable or illogical (e.g., "a tree that's also a horse").

 35

Inappropriate Logic

- (ALOG): This score refers to when a subject uses faulty or illogical reasoning to justify or

explain their response. For example, they might make illogical causal connections, such

as saying, "It's a bird because the sky is green," where the reasoning is disconnected or

nonsensical

Structural Summary

The summary represents the composite of code frequencies plus many ratios,

percentages, and numerical derivations. A Structural Summary Blank has been created for use

with the System to facilitate the summarisation of the protocol. The first page is used to record

demographic data. The second page, Sequence of Scores, is designed for recording of the scoring

for each response. The third page is the actual Structural Summary. The fourth is a worksheet for

tallying six indices and constellations. The fifth contains a table of Z scores and Estimated Z

scores, plus age adjustment data for three variables, and the last page is the Rorschach Location

Sheet for use to identify various location selections when administering the test.

The listing of the codes for each response is done card by card and with the responses

numbered consecutively.

Upper Section

The preparation of the Structural Summary begins with the entry of frequency tallies for

each of the codes in the upper section of the Structural Summary Blank.

Location Features

There are three elements regarding the location for which entries are required, (1)

Organisational Activity, (2) Location Codes, and (3) Developmental Quality.

 36

Organisational Activity. Three entries are required for Organisational Activity. The first, Zf (Z

frequency) is the number of times a Z response has occurred in the record. The second, ZSum, is

for the summation of the weighted Z scores that have been assigned. The third is the estimated

weighted ZSum (Zest), which is derived from a Table of Estimates in the Exner Manual for the

Rorschach InkBlot Test. The Zest value is the one that corresponds to the Zf for the protocol.

Location Codes. Each of the three basic location codes is tallied separately. Two other entries

are required. One is for the total of W + D responses, and the second is for the frequency of the S

responses. The S frequency is not subtracted from the tallies for the three basic location codes of

W, D, or Dd.

Developmental Quality. Frequencies are also entered for each of the developmental quality

codes, disregarding the type of location used.

Determinants

Each of the determinants is tallied separately, except when occurring in a blend. Each

blend is entered in a separate section under Blends, and the determinants in the Blends section

are not counted again when entering the frequencies for the single determinants in the column

headed, Single.

Form Quality

There are three distributions to be entered for form quality. The first, shown by the

heading FQx (Form Quality Extended), pertains to all of the responses in the record. It provides

spaces to enter the frequencies for each of the four types of form quality, plus one for the

frequency of responses in which no form quality has been coded.

 37

The second is headed MQual (Human Movement FQ). It is for the distribution of the

types of form quality for all of the Human Movements responses.

The third is headed W + D (Common Area FQ). It is for recording the FQ frequencies of

all of the responses that have been given to W and D areas.

Contents

It includes each of the 27 categories. The entry for each item represents the total number

of times that the content has been given in the record, regardless of whether the content is

primary or secondary in the coding for the response.

Approach Summary

A section of the Structural Summary contains space to record the location approach used

by the subject. This refers to the sequence of location selections used by the client when

responding to each card.

Special Scores

There are 15 special scores. Two calculations are also required. The first is the Raw Sum

of the first six Special Scores (Raw Sum6). This is the total of all Level 1 and Level 2 scores for

DV, INCOM, DR, and FABCOM, plus the ALOG and CONTAM entries.

The second is the Weighted Sum for those same six special scores (WSUM6). Each of

the six Special Scores receives a weight:

WSUM6 = (1) x DV + (2) x DV2 + (2) x INCOM + (4) x INCOM2 + (3) x DR + (6) x

DR2 + (4) x FABCOM + (7) x FABCOM2 + (5) x ALOG + (7) x CONTAM

Lower Section
 38

The lower section of the Structural Summary in the Rorschach Inkblot Test provides a

comprehensive analysis of a person's cognitive and emotional functioning.

Core Section

The Core Section of the Structural Summary presents fundamental responses that reflect

the individual's cognitive style and emotional processing. It includes key metrics such as human

movement (M) and color responses, providing a basis for understanding personality dynamics

and potential psychological issues. It includes :

1. Lambda (L): Reflects the individual's response style, showing the balance between

form-based and more complex responses. High λ suggests a simplistic,

form-focused approach, while low λ indicates deeper engagement with the stimuli.

2. Erlebnistypus (EB): Divides responses into M (Movement) and C (Color) categories,

assessing whether a person’s responses are more ideational or emotional.

3. Experience Actual (EA): Sum of M, C, and Sum Shading responses, representing the

total psychological resources a person has available for handling stress.

4. EB Pervasive: Identifies if one aspect of EB (either M or C) dominates, indicating

whether the individual tends to think or feel more prominently.

5. Experience Base (eb): Captures the balance between controlled (M) and uncontrolled

(C) emotional reactions.

6. Experienced Stimulation (es): The sum of color and shading responses, indicating how

much stimulation the individual typically experiences.

7. The D-score: Measures coping ability and available psychological resources. Positive D

indicates sufficient coping resources, while negative D suggests stress.

 39

8. Adjusted es : It reflects the amount of emotional stimulation or stress a person

experiences, adjusted for their coping capacity. It helps assess if someone

feels overwhelmed or manages stress well.

9. Adjusted D-score: A refined version of the D-score, adjusted for age-related factors.

Ideation Section

The Ideation Section assesses how a person processes information and formulates

thoughts. Key metrics include the Active-Passive Ratio, which indicates engagement style, the

M-Active-Passive Ratio, reflecting human movement responses, and the Intellectualization

Index, which measures the extent of emotional detachment in thought processes.

1. Active : Passive Ratio : Compares active and passive movement responses, reflecting

the person’s tendency toward either proactive or reactive behaviors.

2. M Active : Passive Ratio : The ratio provides insight into whether an individual tends to

be more active and engaged or passive and reactive in their thinking and behavior. A

higher ratio suggests more proactive energy, while a lower one indicates a more passive

stance.

3. Intellectualization Index: Measures the degree to which the individual uses abstract,

intellectual defenses, calculated by the formula 2AB + ART + AY, where AB is

Abstract, ART is Articulation, and AY is Additional Yield.

Affect Section

The Affect Section evaluates emotional expression and regulation. Important ratios

include the Form-Color Ratio, which indicates emotional control, the Constriction Ratio,

assessing emotional suppression, the Affective Ratio, highlighting the balance of emotional
 40

versus neutral responses, and the Complexity Ratio, which reflects the depth of emotional

processing.

1. Form-Color Ratio (FC: CF + C): Assesses the balance between controlled (FC) and

spontaneous emotional expression (CF or C).

2. Constriction Ratio: Measures how much a person holds back emotionally, with high

scores indicating emotional restraint.

3. Affective Ratio : Reflects engagement with emotional stimuli. High Afr suggests

emotional responsiveness, while low Afr indicates emotional detachment. 4. Complexity

Ratio: Compares the number of complex, integrative responses (blends) to simpler,

form-based ones, indicating the complexity of the individual’s emotional world.

Mediation Section

The Mediation Section focuses on how responses are organized and integrated. It

includes metrics such as Form-Appropriate Extended (quality of responses),

Form-Appropriate Common Areas (adherence to conventional interpretations), and various

measures of form distortion, reflecting perceptual accuracy and thought organization.

1. Form-Appropriate Extended : Responses that are well-formed and elaborate, indicating

clear and organized thinking.

2. Form-Appropriate Common Areas : Common or conventional responses that match

what others typically see, suggesting reality-based thinking.

3. Distorted Form : Responses where form is distorted, indicating impaired reality testing

or unconventional thought processes.

 41

4. Conventional Form Use : Responses that are widely accepted, reflecting conformity

and good reality contact.

5. Unusual Form Use : Less common but plausible responses, suggesting creativity or

unconventional thinking.

Processing Section

The Processing Section evaluates the efficiency of cognitive processing. Metrics like the

Economy Index indicate how well resources are utilized, the Aspirational Ratio assesses

idealistic versus realistic thinking, and Processing Efficiency measures the effectiveness of

cognitive organization and response formulation.

1. Economy Index: Reflects how efficiently the individual processes information, with

higher values indicating economical, streamlined thinking.

2. Aspirational Ratio: The balance between ambition and reality, comparing complex

responses with more basic ones.

3. Processing Efficiency: Measures the effectiveness and clarity of thought, balancing the

effort expended with the quality of outcomes.

Interpersonal Section

The Interpersonal Section examines social engagement and relationship dynamics. It

includes measures of Interpersonal Interest, reflecting the individual’s social interactions, and the

Isolation Index, indicating levels of social withdrawal or isolation.

1. Interpersonal Interest : Measures engagement with others based on responses that

involve human figures or interactions, reflecting interest in relationships.

 42

2. Isolation Index : Reflects the extent to which an individual is detached from others, with

high scores indicating social withdrawal.

Self-Perception Section

The Self-Perception Section consists of seven entries that assess the individual’s self-

awareness and self-concept. Key metrics include frequencies of reflective responses, morbid

content, and body-related themes, alongside the Egocentricity Index, which measures the degree

of self-centeredness in responses.

1. Egocentricity Index (3r + (2)/R): Evaluates the level of self-focus and narcissism. A

high score suggests an inflated self-perception or preoccupation with oneself.

Special Indices

Special Indices provide insight into specific psychological concerns by aggregating

responses related to various conditions. They include the Depression Index (DEPI), Coping

Deficit Index (CDI), Schizophrenia Index (SCZI), and Obsessive-Compulsive Index (OBS),

each highlighting potential areas of psychopathology.

Details of the subject

Name: K S

Age: 23 years

Sex: Female

Educational Qualification: MBA

Marital Status: Single

Socio-economic status: Middle Class

 43

Result Table
 44

Core Section Ideation Section Affect Section Mediation Section

Lambda= 1.6 a:p= 5:1 FC:CF+C= 2:0 XA%= 0.96

EB= 5:1.0 Ma:Mp= 4:1 Pure C= 0 WDA%= 0.95

EA= 6.0 2AB+Art+Ay= 2 Sum C’: Wsum C= X-%= 0.038

eb= 2:0 Sum6= 0 0:1 S- = 0

es= 2 Lv2= 0 Afr= 0.44 P= 4

D= +1 Wsum6= 0 Blends:R= 7:26 X+%= 0.65

Adj es= 1 Xu%= 0.30

Adj D= +1

Information Interpersonal Self-Perception

Processing Section Section Section

Zf= 8 COP= 0 3r+ (2)/ R= 0.65

W:D:Dd= AG= 0 Fr+rF= 3

6:17:2 GHR:PHR= 0 Sum V= 0

W:M= 6:5 a:p= 5:1 FD= 0

Zd= -1.5 Food= 0 An+Xy= 1

DQ+= 6 SumT= 0 H:(H)+Hd+(Hd)= 6:3

DQv= 0 Human Cont= 9

Pure H= 6
 45

Constellation Worksheet

PTI= 0 DEPI= 2- CDI= 1-

S-CON= 4- HVI= 3- OBS= 1-

Interpretation and Discussion

Control and Stress Tolerance

The individual Adj D score of +1 indicates a strong capacity for stress tolerance, allowing

the individual to maintain volitional control over their behavior in stressful situations. Since the

CDI is less than 4, it suggests that the individual's personality organization is normal/mature and

they are capable of coping with everyday living demands effectively.

The EA score of 6.0 is slightly below the average range (7-11 for adults), indicating

limited available resources for managing stress. however the Adj D score of +1 indicates strong

stress tolerance, creating a potential mismatch that warrants further evaluation. The es score of 2

and Adj es score of 1 reflect low internal demands, suggesting the individual is currently

adjusting well to situational stressors despite the limited resources.

The EB value of 5:1.0 and Lambda of 1.6 suggest a tendency to avoid complexity and

ambiguity, relying on defensive strategies under stress. While the EA score of 6.0 indicates

adequate but limited resources, the high Lambda raises concerns that the Adj D score of +1 may

overestimate the individual's true capacity for control. The Adj es score of 1, which is lower than

expected, further suggests that the individual could struggle in demanding situations, making

their stress tolerance appear more robust than it likely is.

Additionally, the FM value of 0 indicates that need states may not be experienced

typically, possibly leading to difficulties in attention and concentration. A SumC’ score of 0

 46

suggests a lack of effective coping mechanisms, potentially resulting in increased emotional

distress. The SumV score of 0 indicates minimal negative self-reflection, while a SumT score of

0 shows no emotional deprivation, suggesting a stable emotional state or an inability to recognize

feelings of deprivation. The Adj es score of 1 is significantly below the expected range (5-9),

indicating potential difficulties in managing internal demands. This suggests that the Adj D score

of +1 may overestimate the individual's actual control and stress tolerance capacities.

Situationally Related Stress

Situationally Related Stress (SRS) refers to stress stemming from recent events or

personal traumas, such as failures, emotional loss, or decision-making conflicts. These

experiences significantly impact psychological functioning, and understanding their presence is

crucial for interpreting Rorschach test scores accurately to avoid misleading conclusions. The

scores reveal limited emotional resources (EA = 6.0) and a moderate perception of stress

tolerance (D = +1, Adj D = +1). However, the equal D and Adj D scores suggest a potential

overestimation of the individual’s control capacities. The low Adj es score of 1 indicates

significant difficulties in managing internal demands, and the minor difference between es (2)

and Adj es suggests a need for careful evaluation of situational stress influences.

The m value of 2 indicate moderate interference with attention and concentration,

indicating some preoccupation with ideation outside the individual's immediate focus. However,

the Sum Y value of 0 implies there are no significant feelings of helplessness or emotional

distress, such as anxiety or sadness. The impact of situational stress primarily affects cognitive

functioning, mildly disrupting thinking and concentration, with minimal emotional turmoil.
 47

The Sum T is not greater than 1 and Sum V is 0, the magnitude of stress does not need to

be reconsidered. The individual appears to manage stress reasonably well without significant

emotional turmoil, and there is no evidence of situational stress linked to recent emotional loss or

guilt. The positive D score suggests that the person is managing internal demands effectively

without significant difficulty. Additionally, the absence of Pure C, M-, and Formless M responses

further supports the conclusion that there is no significant impulsivity or impaired ideational

control. The situational stress appears to be modest, and no notable impulsiveness or affective

displays are present.

With m = 2, and Y = 0, there is a moderate increase in psychological complexity (25% of

blends involve m), but no signs of disorganization or impulsiveness, as D is positive and Y is

absent. There is no significant confusion or ambivalence about feelings, as the color-shading

blend indicates situational stress but not a pre-existing or heightened confusion about emotions.

Affect

The individual demonstrates an introversive personality style, as indicated by their EB

score of 5:1.0, favoring internal reflection and careful consideration in decision-making. With a

Lambda value of 1.6, an avoidant-introversive style is present, suggesting that the person tends

to keep emotions on the periphery, avoiding deep emotional engagement. The low DEPI score of

2 and CDI score of 1 indicate that there are no significant affective disruptions, and the

individual does not exhibit signs of emotional distress or confusion. This combination suggests a

preference for internal problem-solving while maintaining emotional distance.

The DEPI score of 2, coupled with the CDI score of 1, points to a stable emotional state

and minimal affective issues. This suggests that the individual is not experiencing significant
 48

distress or mood disturbances, and they are likely able to form and maintain effective

interpersonal relationships without notable challenges.

The high right-side EB value of 5 indicates significant emotional distress, while the low

left-side value of 1 reflects introversive tendencies, suggesting a reliance on emotional responses

over thoughtful approaches. With a Sum of C', V, T, and Y = 0, there are no indications of

specific conflicts, pointing to generalized emotional flooding that may hinder effective coping

and decision-making.

With a score of 2 on the Intellectualization Index, the individual shows a minimal

tendency to intellectualize emotional experiences, indicating a preference for direct emotional

engagement rather than relying on intellectual defenses. The color projection (CP) score of 0, the

individual shows no signs of using color projection to deny unpleasant emotions, indicating a

more direct engagement with their emotional experiences.With a FC+C ratio of 2:0, the

individual demonstrates well-controlled emotional modulation, indicating a tendency to manage

emotional discharges effectively, similar to most adults.

Affective Ratio (Afr) score of 0.1, the individual displays a significant tendency to avoid

emotional stimuli, indicating discomfort when engaging with emotions. This low score suggests

a marked reluctance to process emotional experiences, which can lead to social constraints and

possible isolation. Such avoidance may stem from difficulties in managing emotional

experiences, resulting in a preference for distancing themselves from emotionally charged

situations. Consequently, this individual may struggle to connect with others emotionally,

impacting their interpersonal relationships.

 49

Therefore, The individual exhibits an introversive personality style with a significant

tendency to avoid emotional engagement, as evidenced by low scores in the Affective Ratio and

a high right-side EB value indicating emotional distress. Despite minimal affective disruptions,

their strong avoidance of emotional stimuli suggests challenges in processing emotions,

potentially leading to social constraints and difficulties in forming deep interpersonal

connections. Overall, this profile reflects a preference for internal reflection while managing

emotions at a distance.

Information Processing

The Zf score of 8 suggests average processing effort, indicating a balanced approach to

information input. With a Lambda value of 1.6, the individual demonstrates an avoidant style,

which may contribute to limited processing effort and potential adjustment difficulties. The W:D

ratio of 6:17:2 indicates a significantly higher frequency of D responses compared to W,

suggesting a very economical processing strategy, while the low Dd score indicates typical

processing without excessive scanning. Overall, this profile reflects a tendency toward efficient

cognitive processing with some influence of avoidance.

The consistency in location selection implies a stable and predictable processing

approach, aligning with previous hypotheses about the individual's regular processing habits.

Additionally, the W ratio of 6:5 indicates a balanced effort between broad scanning and

reasoning-based approaches. While this reflects an appropriate alignment of cognitive capacities,

the close ratio suggests that the individual may struggle to reconcile extensive scanning with

focused reasoning, potentially leading to inconsistencies in processing tasks.

 50

The Zd score of -1.5 indicates a typical level of scanning efficiency, suggesting that the

individual engages in a balanced scanning activity without significant neglect of important cues

in the stimulus field. This value reflects neither hasty scanning nor excessive detail orientation,

supporting a reasonable approach to processing information. The PSV score of 0 indicates no

difficulties in processing efficiency, suggesting the individual is able to shift attention effectively

without being preoccupied or fixating on previous responses.

The DQ+ score of 6 falls within the expected range, indicating adequate quality in

processing activity. The absence of DQv and DQv/+ scores suggests a lack of indecisiveness or

ambiguity in responses, reinforcing the notion of stable and precise cognitive processing.

Cognitive Mediation

The XA% score of 0.96 indicates that the individual's ability to perceive reality in a

conventional manner is highly intact, as it exceeds the threshold of 0.90. The WDA% of 0.95,

which is closely aligned with the XA%, further reinforces this finding, suggesting that the

individual consistently applies their capacity for accurate mediation across various situations.

This strong alignment indicates effective reality testing, with responses being appropriate and

realistic. The overall high scores reflect a meticulous cognitive style, enabling the person to

navigate complex situations effectively, minimizing variability in judgment and ensuring reliable

responses even under challenging circumstances.

The X-% score of 0.038 indicates that the individual has very few instances of

mediational dysfunction, as it falls well below the expected threshold of 0.15. This suggests that

their reality testing is largely intact, and there are minimal distortions in their perception of the
 51

stimulus features. Additionally, the absence of S- responses (S- = 0) indicates that emotional

factors such as anger or negativism do not contribute to the few instances of dysfunction.

The score of P = 4, which falls below the expected range of six to eight Popular

responses, suggests the individual provides less conventional and more individualistic answers,

even when clear social cues are present. This may reflect a preference for independent thinking

or deviation from social norms. With an R value of 26, the low number of Populars likely

indicates a natural inclination to interpret situations uniquely, rather than being response-limited.

With an FQ+ value of 0 and the individual possessing an average IQ, the absence of

high-quality form responses suggests a potentially relaxed or disengaged mediational approach.

This could indicate defensiveness, where the individual may avoid taking risks in their

interpretations, or a lackadaisical attitude during the testing process. While this result does not

imply cognitive impairment, it highlights a processing style that may reflect personality traits,

such as a preference for simplicity or reluctance to engage deeply with complex stimuli. Further

Review of other form quality codings is necessary to clarify these observations and gain a more

comprehensive understanding of the individual’s mediational style.

With an X+% of 0.65, which falls between 55 and 69, the individual tends to make more

conventional mediation decisions, though not excessively so. This suggests that they can balance

social expectations with some degree of originality. The low X-% of 0.038 (well below 0.20)

indicates a low likelihood of problematic or inappropriate behaviors driven by mediational

dysfunction. The Xu% of 0.30, which is higher than typical, suggests that while the individual

does make more unconventional or creative decisions, these are still appropriate and not socially

deviant. This balance reflects a healthy mix of conventionality and individualism.

 52

Ideation

With an EB of 5:1, the protocol indicates an extratensive coping style, suggesting that the

individual is more likely to merge emotions with thinking during problem-solving or

decision-making. However, the Lambda of 1.6 suggests an avoidant-extratensive style. This

means that while emotions play a significant role in the person's thought processes, there is a

tendency to avoid fully engaging with complex emotions, leading to impulsive thinking and

decision-making. This combination may result in flawed judgments, especially in challenging

situations, as feelings overly influence their reasoning, reducing the effectiveness of their

responses. The difference arises because the affect category reflects emotional distress (high

right-side EB) with limited thoughtful emotional control (introversive tendencies), while the

ideation category focuses on how emotions influence thinking. In the ideation category, the

extratensive style shows that emotional responses merge with cognitive processing rather than

being purely logical or detached.

EBPer score of 0 suggests a lack of pervasiveness in the identified coping style. This

means that the individual, even though they exhibit an extratensive coping style, is flexible in

decision-making. They are capable of pushing emotions aside when necessary and adopting a

more ideational or thoughtful approach in certain situations, allowing for greater adaptability in

problem-solving. The a ratio of a:p is 5:1 indicates that the individual has a well-fixed set of

ideational frameworks and values, suggesting inflexible thinking. While not entirely rigid, this

inflexibility may hinder their ability to consider alternative perspectives or solutions, particularly

when faced with challenges to their established beliefs, limiting their adaptability in

decision-making situations. Were Scores of HVI = 0, OBS = 0, and MOR = 0 indicate a flexible
 53

and optimistic cognitive style, free from hypervigilance, perfectionism, or pessimism, facilitating

clear and adaptable thinking.

The left-side EB value of 2, with FM at 0 and m at 2, indicates low peripheral mental

activity. The absence of FM responses suggests a lack of awareness or minimization of internal

needs, while the presence of m responses highlights increased peripheral ideation due to

situational stress. This pattern reflects a potential avoidant coping style, where external demands

may overwhelm conceptual thought without addressing internal needs effectively.

The Ma:Mp ratio of 4:1 suggests a healthy balance between fantasy and reality, with the

individual using fantasy for stress relief without excessive reliance. This indicates a moderate

coping strategy, but vigilance is needed to prevent potential escapism in stressful situations. The

Sum6 score of 0 and WSum6 score of 0 indicate no instances of cognitive mismanagement or

ideational slippage. This suggests that the individual demonstrates clear and coherent thinking,

with no significant issues in conceptual clarity.

Self-perception

This individual exhibits a predominantly neutral self-perception, characterized by an

adaptive approach to life situations while maintaining a degree of emotional distance. The test

data suggests that she possesses a stable sense of self, also reflect an absence of significant

affective disruptions, suggesting that she does not frequently experience emotional distress or

confusion regarding her self-identity.

However, her tendency to engage in emotional avoidance reflects a reliance on internal

reflection rather than open emotional engagement, suggesting that while she may be aware of her

feelings, she tends to keep them at a distance. This avoidance can hinder her ability to process
 54

emotions fully, potentially leading to challenges in interpersonal relationships where emotional

depth is required.

The individual's introversive personality style is evident, reflecting a preference for

internal problem-solving over external expression. There was presence of well-defined ideational

framework but suggesting potential inflexibility in her thinking patterns. While she can adopt a

thoughtful approach to situations, her inflexible ideational structure may limit her adaptability,

particularly in emotionally charged contexts.

Moreover, she has limited internal drive to confront feelings, which points to difficulties

in managing internal demands and highlights a potential struggle to engage deeply with her

emotional landscape. Although she may not experience significant emotional deprivation, her

lack of emotional engagement can result in feelings of isolation or disconnection from others.

The absence of significant negative self-reflection, suggests that she is not preoccupied

with self-criticism or harsh judgments of herself. Instead, her stable emotional state allows her to

navigate daily challenges without falling into the trap of negative self-assessment. This suggests

that while she maintains a level of emotional distance, she is not plagued by pervasive feelings of

inadequacy or unworthiness.

Interpersonal Perception and Behavior

The CDI score of 1 indicates that this individual demonstrates adequate social maturity

and possesses the resources necessary for maintaining interpersonal relationships. They are likely

to navigate social interactions effectively without significant difficulties or emotional avoidance.

The HVI score of 3 indicates a moderate level of hypervigilance, suggesting that the

individual exhibits caution and guardedness in interpersonal relationships. This tendency may
 55

lead to preoccupations with personal space and a lack of sustained close connections due to

feelings of vulnerability. The a ratio of 5:1 indicates a significantly higher frequency of active

movement responses, suggesting that the individual generally adopts a more active and engaged

role in interpersonal relations. This reflects a propensity to take initiative and make decisions

rather than assuming a passive stance.

A Food (Fd) score of 0 indicates a lack of dependency orientation, suggesting that the

individual does not exhibit reliance on others for direction and support in interpersonal

relationships. This reflects a more independent and self-sufficient interpersonal style. A SumT

score of 0 indicates that the individual is overly cautious in expressing needs for closeness,

suggesting a significant concern for personal space and difficulty in forming or maintaining close

emotional ties with others. This may reflect a conservative approach to interpersonal

relationships.

With a sum of human contents at 9 and Pure H at 6, the participant demonstrates a

significant interest in others and an ability to perceive interpersonal dynamics realistically. This

indicates that they are likely to engage with others thoughtfully, fostering meaningful

relationships while maintaining a clear understanding of social cues and interactions. However,

the relatively high number of human content responses suggests a possible tendency to

over-invest emotionally, which may lead to challenges in managing expectations within

relationships.

With an Isolation Index of 0.23, the participant exhibits a moderate level of social

interaction, indicating that they are less socially active than might be expected. This score

suggests a willingness to engage with others, although participation in social interactions may be
 56

somewhat limited. It does not reflect a pathological withdrawal but rather a preference or

reluctance to engage in routine social intercourse.

The individual demonstrates effective navigation of interpersonal relationships and

adequate social maturity. However, they exhibit caution and guardedness in social interactions,

which can lead to limited close connections. While they engage actively in relationships, there is

hesitancy in expressing needs for closeness. Overall, they show a significant interest in others but

prefer a more limited level of social engagement rather than experiencing pathological

withdrawal.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the assessment reveals a complex interplay between the individual's

emotional engagement, coping strategies, and interpersonal dynamics. The participant

demonstrates a solid capacity for stress tolerance and adequate social maturity, reflected in their

ability to navigate relationships effectively. However, their guardedness and tendency to avoid

emotional depth may limit their capacity for close connections, leading to a preference for

maintaining emotional distance.

While the individual possesses the resources to cope with everyday demands, the

discrepancy between their self-reported stress tolerance and limited available resources indicates

the need for further evaluation to understand their true capabilities. The introversive personality

style, coupled with a significant tendency to avoid emotional engagement, suggests potential

challenges in processing emotions, which could impact interpersonal relationships and contribute

to feelings of isolation.
 57

Despite these challenges, the participant's stable emotional state and absence of

significant negative self-reflection indicate a generally adaptive approach to life. By

acknowledging and addressing the avoidance of emotional experiences, the individual may

enhance their interpersonal connections and emotional processing, ultimately fostering deeper,

more meaningful relationships. Further support and exploration of their emotional landscape

could aid in promoting healthier coping strategies and facilitating greater emotional engagement

in their social interactions.

 58

References

Administrator. (2016, September 28). Psychopathology assessment - iResearchNet. Psychology.

https://psychology.iresearchnet.com/counseling-psychology/personality-assessment/psy

c hopathology-assessment/

American Psychological Association (n.d.). Personality Assessment. Retrieved March 28,

2022, from https://www.apa.org/ed/graduate/specialize/personality

American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Personality. In APA dictionary of

psychology. Retrieved March 27, 2022, from https://dictionary.apa.org/personality

Bartram, D., DeMers, S., & Nielsen, S. L. (2022). Using core competences to

facilitate international practice and mobility. In Elsevier eBooks (pp. 11–23).

https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-818697-8.00176-x

Bornstein, R. (2012). Rorschach Score Validation as a Model for 21st-Century

Personality Assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 26 - 38.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.627961.

Carey, W. B., Crocker, A. C., Elias, E. R., & Coleman, W. P. (2009).

Developmental-Behavioral pediatrics: Expert Consult - Online and Print. Elsevier Health

Sciences.

Cattell, R. B. (1943). The description of personality: basic traits resolved into clusters. Journal of

Abnormal & Social Psychology, 38(4), 476–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054116

Cherry, K. (2022, August 12). What is Personality?. VeryWell Mind.

https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-personality-2795416
 59

Cuncic, A., MA. (2022, November 29). Psychopathology: Definition, types, and

diagnosis. Verywell Mind.

https://www.verywellmind.com/an-overview-of-psychopathology-4178942#toc-diagnost

i c-systems

Ergin, O., & Set, Z. (2019). Rorschach Inkblot Test implementation in young adult with

HIV positive diagnosis in existential background: a case report. Anatolian Journal of

Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.5455/apd.45664.

Exner, J. E. (1974). The Rorschach: A Comprehensive System. Wiley.

King, W. (n.d.). Psychological Assessment | Abnormal Psychology.

https://courses.lumenlearning.com/wm-abnormalpsych/chapter/psychological-assessmet

Krueger, R. F., & Markon, K. E. (2006). Understanding psychopathology. Current Directions in

Psychological Science, 15(3), 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00418.x

Magazine, P., & Magazine, P. (2024, January 16). Psychopathology: Definition, history,

and types. Psychologs Magazine | Mental Health Magazine | Psychology Magazine |

Self-Help Magazine.

https://www.psychologs.com/psychopathology-definition-history-and-types/ Mcleod, S., PhD.

(2024). Theories of Personality: Hans Eysenck, Gordon Allport & Raymond Cattell.

Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/personality-theories.html Sacks,

J. M., & Levy, S. (2007). The sentence completion test. In Alfred A. Knopf eBooks (pp.

357–402). https://doi.org/10.1037/11452-011

Mihura, J., & Meyer, G. (2015). Rorschach Inkblot Test. , 1-6.

https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118625392.WBECP517.
 60

Parker K. (1983). A meta-analysis of the reliability and validity of the Rorschach. Journal of

personality assessment, 47(3), 227–231. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4703_1

Psychology Tools. (2023, November 30). Psychological Assessment Scales and Measures

Psychology Tools. https://www.psychologytools.com/download-scales-and-measures/

"Rorschach Inkblot Test", Retrieved (2014)

Schultze-Lutter, F., Schmidt, S. J., & Theodoridou, A. (2018). Psychopathology—a precision

tool in need of re-sharpening. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00446

Shaffer, T. W., Erdberg, P., & Haroian, J. (2016). Cultural Considerations in Rorschach

Interpretation. Routledge

Telles-Correia, D., & Sampaio, D. (2016). Editorial: Historical Roots of Psychopathology.

Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00905

Viglione, D., Towns, B., & Lindshield, D. (2012). Understanding and Using the Rorschach

Inkblot Test to Assess Post-Traumatic Conditions. Psychological Injury and Law, 5,

135-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12207-012-9128-5.

Weiner, I. (1997). Current status of the Rorschach Inkblot Method.. Journal of personality

assessment, 68 1, 5-19 . https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA6801_2.

Weiner, I. B. (2003). What the Rorschach can do for you: Incremental validity in clinical

applications. Assessment, 10(4), 321-336

Wood, J., & Lilienfeld, S. (1999). The Rorschach Inkblot Test: A Case of Overstatement?.

Assessment, 6, 341 - 351. https://doi.org/10.1177/107319119900600405.

 61

Wood, J., Nezworski, M., Stejskal, W., Garven, S., & West, S. (1999). Methodological Issues in

Evaluating Rorschach Validity: A Comment on Burns and Viglion (1996), Weiner (1996),

and Ganellen (1996). Assessment, 6, 115 - 129.

https://doi.org/10.1177/107319119900600202.

Yu, J., & Lee, Q. (2021). Therapeutic exploration with the Rorschach Inkblot Test: a case

demonstration of the lifeworld approach with a child. Asia Pacific Journal of Counselling

and Psychotherapy, 12, 127 - 137. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507686.2021.1960399.