Soil Test Report

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT
FOR
PROPOSED B+G+20 STORIED BUILDING
AT
PLOT NO – 13816, 13817, 13827, 13828
KHAITIAN NO – 11336, MOUZA – KONNAGAR 2
MIRPARA UNDER KONNAGAR MUNICIPALITY
WARD NO – 15, DIST – HOOGHLY
JOB ENTRUSTED BY
M/S BHAWANI URBAN HOUSING

DEVELOPMENT LTD
829/A, LAKE TOWN BLOCK – A, J.J.HOUSE
KOLKATA – 700 089
JOB CONDUCTED BY
JP GEO CONSULTANTS
AN ISO 9001:2015 CERTIFIED ORGANISATION
REG. OFFICE- 66, ANDUL ROAD, HOWRAH – 711 109

LABORATORY-AC–73, PRAFULLA KANON, KESTOPUR, KOLKATA – 101
EMAIL: [email protected], Mob: 9830813308
Page: 0
JP GEO CONSULTANTS Job No: 20317
PREFACE
A detailed geotechnical investigation including laboratory testing was carried out for the
Proposed B+G+20 Storied Building at Plot No – 13816, 13817, 13827, 13828, Khaitian
No – 11336, Mouza – Konnagar 2 Mirpara Under Konnagar Municipality Ward No –
15, Dist – Hooghly. The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the soil parameters
for design of foundation for proposed structure with particular reference to safe bearing
capacity and anticipated settlement.
The Geo-technical investigation was awarded by M/S Bhawani Urban Housing
Development Ltd, 829/A, Lake Town Block – A, J.J.House, Kolkata – 700 089. The
investigation work for this project was started on 25th June 2022 and completed on 4th July
2022.
The report has been prepared after careful study of all data collected during fieldwork and
laboratory testing and it deals with geotechnical properties of the sub-soil. Section – I of this
report covers the fieldwork while Section – II contains the results of all the laboratory test
and discussions thereon. Section – III deals with the engineering appraisal and
recommendations.
Page: 1
SECTION – I
1.0 INTRODUCTION
M/S Bhawani Urban Housing Development Ltd, 829/A, Lake Town Block – A,
J.J.House, Kolkata – 700 089, entrusted the soil investigation work for the Proposed
B+G+20 Storied Building at Plot No – 13816, 13817, 13827, 13828, Khaitian No –
11336, Mouza – Konnagar 2 Mirpara Under Konnagar Municipality Ward No – 15,
Dist – Hooghly. At the onset of the work, four (04) nos. of boreholes are sunk.
2.0 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
The aim of the present study was to bring out the stratiography, strength characteristics of
the sub-strata at the site, by conducting bore holes studies including in situ tests and
laboratory investigations the findings were to be applied for realistic selection.
3.0 INVESTIGATION SCHEME AND LOCATION OF TESTS
The scheme of investigation was formulated by the Clients, which involved sinking of
four (04) nos. of boreholes with the depth of 40.00m depth respectively from existing
ground level, collection of undisturbed samples from cohesive deposit, carrying out
standard penetration tests within the borehole, performing necessary laboratory tests on
selected soil samples and submission of a report.
Sketch showing location of boreholes is given in the following page

Page: 2
BH-1
(DEPTH = 40 M.)
BH-2
(DEPTH = 40 M.)
BH-3
BH-4
(DEPTH = 40 M.)
(DEPTH = 40 M.)
BORE HOLE LOCATION PLAN

BH = BORE HOLE
4.0 FIELD EXPLORATION
At the proposed project site, four (04) nos. of boreholes were sunk. Locations were
finalized by client/consultants. The field operations consisted of boring, field test, and
collection of disturbed and undisturbed samples, identification, labeling and preservations
of the samples collected. The soil samples were collected by pushing a sampling tube in
the bore hole at suitable intervals and depth and then taken out. The samples so recovered
and collected in plastic bags, sealed, marked and taken for laboratory analysis. The boring
operation has been done in two stages ( Auger and Rotary Wash Boring).
4.1 BORING
The boring was done by a combination of Auger & Rotary wash boring at lower depths.
Flush jointed steel casing tubes were used to prevent side collapse of boreholes in Shell
method of boring. No casing was provided in the Rotary wash borings since stabilization
of hole was made by circulation of bentonite mud. The depth of casings at various stages
of sampling, borehole depths, depth of collection of undisturbed soil samples (UDS),
description of soil, ‘N’ values during SPT at various depths and the depth at which ground
water was encountered at different locations are shown in the respective borehole logs in
Appendix-I of this report.
4.2 SAMPLING
Disturbed samples were taken at suitable intervals of depth and at changes of strata in
order to physical examination of the nature of all the representative strata. These were
collected from the auger and the barrel of the split spoon sampler after the standard
penetration tests. The depth wise locations of the entire disturbed and standard penetration
test samples have been given in the bore log data sheets, enclosed with this report.
4.2.1 COLLECTION OF UN-DISTURBED SAMPLES
Un-disturbed samples were collected as per specifications given in IS: 1892-1979. After
recovery of the samples, the sample tubes were properly sealed at both ends by wax,
marked and sent for laboratory testing.
Page: 3
4.3 IN-SITU TEST
a) Standard Penetration Test:
Standard penetration tests (SPT) were carried out in soil strata inside boreholes to
determine consistency and strength characteristics of the subsoil in accordance with IS:
2131. The number of blows (N-value) required to drive the standard split spoon sampler
of 50mm diameter for a penetration of last 30cm when driven with a 63.5kg monkey
falling freely from a height of 750mm is given in the borehole logs at corresponding
depths (Appendix-I).
Page: 4
SECTION – II
5.0 LABORATORY TESTS
Laboratory tests have been conducted as per IS specifications on soil samples to determine
the following properties.
i) Particle Size Distribution
By the term particle size distribution, we mean sieve and hydrometer analysis. Particle
size distribution test is performed to determine the percentage of different grain sizes
contained within a soil. The mechanical or sieve analysis is performed to determine the
distribution of the coarser, larger sized particles and the hydrometer method is used to
determine the distribution of the finer particles.
The distribution of different grain sizes affects the engineering properties of soil.
Grain size analysis provides the grain size distribution, and it is required in
classifying the soil.
The test has been performed in the laboratory as per IS: 2720 (Part 4) - 1985.
ii) Atterberg Limits
In 1911, the Swedish soil scientist Albert Atterberg (1846-1916) developed a series of
tests to evaluate the relationship between moisture content and soil consistency
(Atterberg,1911; Blackall, 1952). Then, in the 1930, Karl Terzaghi and Arthur Casagrande
adapted these tests for civil engineering purpose, and they soon became a routine part of
Geotechnical engineering. This series includes three separate tests : the liquid limit test,
the plastic limit test, and the shrinkage limit test. Together they are known as the
Atterberg limits test (ASTM D427 and D4318).
The liquid limit and plastic limit tests are routinely performed in many soil mechanics
laboratories. However, the shrinkage limit test is less useful, and is rarely performed by
civil engineers. Shrinkage limit test is very much required in finding the expansiveness of
soil. In our laboratory, liquid limit and plastic limit tests have been done as per IS: 2720
(Part 5) – 1985. As per soil strata encountered in the field, we observed that the basic
material is sand and silt and thus no shrinkage property will be observed. Thus
considering of no use we have discarded shrinkage limit test.
Page: 5
iii) Specific Gravity of Soil
The ratio of the unit weight of a material to the unit weight of distilled water at 40C is a
common definition of specific gravity. Soil specific gravities, however, are normally
referred to the weight of water at 200C. In itself, the specific gravity is not an index
property of a soil. It is, however, required for determination of the unit weight of soil and
in many computations.While it is possible to have a range of values from 2.2 to 3.5,
most soils have specific gravity from 2.60 to 2.80. Any values outside of this latter
range should be viewed sceptically and a retest should be made to verify the value.
In our laboratory test, specific gravity has been determined as per IS: 2720 (Part 3 / Sec 2)
– 1980.
iv) Direct Shear Test
The soil specimen used in the test is usually square in plan of size 60 mm x 60 mm and
thickness about 20 to 25 mm. The direct shear test equipment essentially consists of shear
box, loading yoke for applying normal force, geared jack for applying shear force and
facilities for measuring shear force, shear displacement and vertical deformation for
volume change. This test is particularly done for soil samples which are predominantly
coarse grained soils.
v) Tri-axial shear Test and unconfined compressive strength tests
For triaxial shear and unconfined compressive strength tests, three no. 38 mm diameter 76
mm long specimens were obtained by jacking out the soil core, each into a thin-walled
brass tube, having the wall thickness of 1/32". The inside of the tubes was coated with a
thin layer of silicon oil.These were run on the clayey silt samples to determine their shear
strengths. The cell pressures employed were 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 kg/sq.cm. The samples were
tested under quick condition at a rate of 1.25 mm/min and were loaded up to maximum
20% axial strain.
vi) Consolidation Test
To obtain specimens for consolidation test, the odometer ring was placed on the trimmed
horizontal faces of the soil within the 10 cm diameter sampling tube and the soil around
the cutting edge was gradually removed with a spatula as the ring was gently pushed into
Page: 6
the soil. The ring with the soil was then removed by cutting across the soil core with the
help of a piano wire saw.
Consolidation tests were run in floating ring type odometers, in single & four unit
consolidation frames under standard load increment ratio starting from 0.25 kg/sq.cm and
going up to 8 kg/sq.cm in general. The pressure vs void ratio curves are given in this
report.
vii) Natural Moisture Content
The natural moisture content of soil is determined from samples taken in the field and
placed in a container which is then sealed to prevent loss of moisture by evaporation.
Natural moisture content determinations are valuable in interpreting information
obtained from test borings.
Generally, 100 gm of soil is enough to determine the moisture content of fine grained
soils. Larger samples are required for soils that contain gravel. Normally, moisture content
samples are placed in metal dishes (canisters) that have tight fitting covers. When the
moisture content test is to be performed within 1 day after the sample is obtained, sealing
of the container is not required. If a longer time interval will elapse between sampling and
testing, the containers may be sealed. Natural moisture content have been determined in
the laboratory as per IS : 2720 (Part 2) – 1973.
viii) Bulk Density and Dry Density
Soil Bulk density is defined as the ratio of the mass of dry solids to the bulk volume of the
soil occupied by those dry solids. The bulk volume includes the volume of the solids and
the pore space. Bulk density is needed for converting water percentage by weight to
content by volume, for calculating porosity and void ratio when the particle density
is known, and for estimating the weight of a volume of soil too large to weight
conveniently.
The dry density = Bulk density / ( 1 + moisture content % )
Page: 7
6.0 GROUND CONDITION
On the basis of findings in the field, onsite identification & examination of samples the
subsoil deposits of this site have been subdivided into seven (07) different strata for the
site. Following table gives a brief description about the subsoil conditions and subsoil
parameters at site obtained at site.
Page: 8
Shear
Parameters (mv) m2/kN×10-4
Stratum & Average Liquid Plastic
Υb Range(kPa)
Thickness Description of Soil Field N Limit Limit
KN/m3 C
(m) value (%) (%) Ф0 50- 100-
(kPa) 25-50
100 200
I Fillings dark grey mixed soil rubbish,
- - - 17.5* - - - - -
0.60 to 5.00 few fly ash, concrit, brick bats and etc.
Soft to medium stiff grey to bluish grey
II
silty clay to clayey silt with fine mica 3 33 21 18.0 26 - 3.00 3.30 3.07
4.50
flakes observed (CL).
Soft grey to dark grey silty clay with
III
occasionally decomposed vegetation 5 70 24 18.0 32 - 3.20 3.65 3.37
6.00
(CH).
IV Stiff bluish grey silty clay with a few
12 60 20 18.6 67 - 1.50 1.68 1.53
3.30 calcereous nodules pieces (CH).
Very stiff yellowish brown silty clay to
IV
clayey silt with few rusty brown spots 16 52 19 19.4 82 - 1.15 1.25 1.10
6.40
(CH-CI).
V Dense light brownish grey silty sand
38 NP NP 19.0* - 34* E = 40 MPa, µ = 0.35
5.50 with fine mica particles(SM).
VII Very dense light brownish grey silty
55 NP NP 20.0* - 35* E = 50 MPa, µ = 0.35
>12.65 sand with mica particles(SM-SP).
* Suggested Value
Generalized Soil Profile With Design Parameters
NP: Non Plastic
Standing Water Level was found to be at a depth 1.00m below Existing Ground Level however for design purposes the same
should be considered at the Finished Ground Level.
JP GEO CONSULTANTS Job No. 20317

SECTION – III
7.0 ENGINEERING APPRAISAL & RECOMMENDATIONS
The proposed structure for the sites will be proposed B+G+20 Storied Building.
Depending upon the load coming from the structure and depending upon the subsoil
conditions, deep foundation in the form of bored cast in situ piles is recommended.
However for ancillary and minor structures aspect of open foundations is also discussed.
7.1 OPEN FOUNDATIONS
The net safe bearing capacity and settlement of open foundation is determined using the
design soil parameters presented in the generalized soil profile of Section II of this report.
Factor of safety has been considered as 2.50 and the ground water table considered at the
ground level itself, conservative side. Values of net safe bearing capacity and settlement
of footing under different imposed intensity have been presented in tabular form. Both
shear and settlement criteria should be checked and considered.
It is desirable and convenient to rest all open foundation under similar stratum condition.
For this purpose, it may be suggested to inspect all foundation pits during its excavation.
The recognition of the competent founding material should be made by identification of
the type of soil, its colour and approximate strength characteristics. In case, the sub-soil is
found to be of softer consistency at the founding depth, the same should, however, be
excavated, removed and backfilled with lean concrete upto the founding level.Open
foundation is recommended both the founding level of 2.00m depth below EGL.
Settlement(mm)
Depth of
Bearing Capacity corresponding to Net
Footing Size foundation
(kPa) Safe Bearing Capacity
(m2) (m)
(kPa)
Foundation
Width Length placed within Net Ultimate Net Safe
Stratum-II
1.50 1.50 2.00 221 88 16
2.00 2.00 2.00 208 83 25
1.50 2.00 2.00 195 79 17
2.00 3.00 2.00 181 72 26
1.50 Strip 2.00 170 68 31
2.00 Strip 2.00 160 64 41
Page: 9
All foundation shall be placed within Stratum-II. Heterogonous filled up soil was found to
extend upto a depth of about 5.00m in case of BH-03, hence if the same is found at the
founding level, it shall be replaced with well graded well compacted sand
7.2 PILE FOUNDATION
Deep foundation in the form of pile foundation is convenient solutions for heavily loaded
structures. Based on sub-soil condition, both bored cast in situ piles and driven type of pile
are feasible for this site however driven type of pile causes considerable vibrations hence
if any case driven type of piles is not feasible, bored cast in situ piles may be opted.
7.2.1 DISCUSSION ON ESTIMATION OF LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY OF

PILES
Normally two types of piles are used to transfer higher foundation loads to underlying
soil. Load carrying capacity of pile depends primarily on two factors, (1) structural
capacity of pile shaft and (2) resistance offered by surrounding soils by means of side
friction and tip resistance. Accordingly, piles are classified as friction and end bearing
types depending upon mechanism of load transfer. It is essential that the pile shaft be
formed ensuring proper contact with surrounding soils. Also, proper seating of pile tip in
firm soil is essential towards development of tip resistance. In case of driven piles,
formation of proper pile shaft and proper seating of pile tip is not difficult. Moreover,
driving resistance provides reasonable assessment of pile capacity during installation
process.
The situation is quite different for bored pile. Possibility of formation of improper pile
shaft and inadequate seating of pile tip are not uncommon. Therefore, performance of
bored pile depends largely on the methodology, piling equipment, piling experience and
quality control. Based on experience on large number of bored piling works, it is observed
that, formation of proper pile shaft including proper seating should not be taken for
granted.
Page: 10
Safe Vertical Safe Vertical
Pile Shaft Length Bored Depth
Capacity in Capacity in
Dia. From EGL
Compression Tension
(mm) (kN) (KN) (m) (m)
500 1000 600 25.50 30.00
550 1200 700 25.50 30.00
600 1400 775 25.50 30.00
750 2200 1100 25.50 30.00
600 1700 1000 30.50 35.00

750 2650 1450 30.50 35.00
1000 5050 2400 30.50 35.00
Cut-off-level = 4.50m below EGL
(Note: Pile capacity shall be verified by load tests).
Lateral Load Carrying Capacities of Piles

Free Head Fixed Head
Lateral Depth of Lateral
Pile Dia. (mm) Depth of Fixity
Capacity Fixity Capacity
(m)
(KN) (m) (KN)
500 4.81 10 5.57 27
550 5.29 13 6.12 32
600 5.77 15 6.68 38
750 7.21 23 8.35 60
1000 9.61 41 11.13 107
Calculation is based upon considering 1% of deflection of the diameter of the pile at pile
cut-off, Grade of Concrete: M25
Allowable increase in pile capacities under wind/seismic loading condition should be in
accordance with the provisions of BIS. As per IS: 1904 – 1986 “Code of Practice for
Design and Construction of Foundations in Soils: General Requirements” allowable
increase in pile capacity may be considered up to 25% under DL + LL + WL combination
when WL is more than 25% of DL and LL. For the seismic loading, as per Table-1 of IS:
1893 (Part 1): 2002 “Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures” the allowable
increase in pile capacity may be considered up to 50% when pile tip rests on and soil
having N – value higher than 30. For piles resting on weaker strata, allowable increase in
pile capacity under seismic loading may be considered as 25% as per Table-1 of IS: 1893
(Part 1): 2002. In order to assess adequacy of piling methodology, equipment etc., it is
recommended to carry out trial boring and install test pile prior to commencement of
working piles. The safe capacity of pile shall be verified by conducting actual load test on
pile following provisions of BIS code of practice. The grade of concrete such pile shall be
minimum M25.
Page: 11
8.0 CHEMICAL ACTION
Results of chemical tests carried out on water samples falls under Class-1 as per IS 456-
200 and does not call for use of any special treatment or special cement. Provision of IS:
456-2000 shall be followed. Concrete should be dense with proper control on water-
cement ratio.
9.0 GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS
a) All foundation design should be carried out as per latest BIS code of practice.
b) Backfilling should be done with excavated earth in layers with proper
compaction and addition of water, as required.
c) The surface of the excavated area should not be left exposed and immediate mud
mat must be carried out.
d) Special care needs to be taken during excavation for foundations so that the
founding stratum does not get disturbed by excavation process and especially by
ground/seepage water.
e) The net safe allowable bearing capacities have been calculated without
considering the influence of adjacent foundation.
f) The foundation bed should be properly shaped, levelled and properly compacted
before laying the mud mat and the mud mat should also be compacted.
FOR JP Geo Consultants
Jishnu Pal
B.Tech(Civil), M.E(Geo-tech)
KMC REG NO. G.T/I/32
Page: 12
Project
Report Sheet
Stratum-VII: Very dense light brownish grey silty sand with mica particles(SM-SP).
Stratum-VI: Dense light brownish grey silty sand with fine mica particles(SM).
Stratum-V::Very
Stratum-IV: Stiff bluish grey silty clay with a few calcereous nodules pieces (CH).
Stratum-III: Soft grey to dark grey silty clay with occasionally decomposed vegetation (CH).
Stratum-II: Soft to medium stiff grey to bluish grey silty clay to clayey silt with fine mica flakes observed (CL).
Stratum-I: Fillings dark grey mixed soil rubbish, few fly ash, concrit, brick bats and etc.
SUB-SOIL PROFILE
<----REDUCED LEVEL BELOW E.G.L.
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-0.60
Stratum-I Stratum-I
Stratum-I N3
-2.00 -2.10 N 12
uuustiff yellowish brown silty clay to clayey silt with few rusty brown spots (CH-CI).
N3 N5 N 18 N 13
Stratum-II Stratum-II
N5 N 25 N6
-5.00 -5.00 -5.00
N2 N4 N4 Stratum-II -5.90
-6.50 -6.60
-7.00
N5
Stratum-III Stratum-III
Stratum-III
N5 N3 N3
-10.00 -10.00
N4
-12.50 N7 -12.50 N4 N5
-12.90
Stratum-IV Stratum-IV N6
-14.00
-15.00 N 12 N 12 N7 -15.00
-15.50 -15.50
-15.90 Stratum-IV N 15
-16.50
Stratum-V Stratum-V
N 18 N 16 N 14
-20.00
-20.00 N 20 -20.00
N 24 N 24 N 18 Stratum-V
-22.00 -22.00
N 30 N 32 -22.90 N 29
N 36 N 35 N 30 N 32
-25.00 -25.00
N 42 Stratum-VI N 44 Stratum-VI N 42 N 45
Stratum-VI
N 49 -27.00 N 51 N 49 N 48
-27.40
-28.50 N 50 N 52 N 54 N 50
-29.00
-30.00 -30.00
N 53 N 55 N 60 N 54
N 55 N 56 N 62 N 53
N 56 N 58 N 65 N 56
-35.00 N 63 N 65 N 70 N 66 -35.00
Stratum-VII Stratum-VII
N 69 Stratum-VII N 72 N 74 N 71
N 74 N 78 N 77 N 75
-40.00 -40.00
-40.45 N 78 -40.45 N 81 -40.35 N 82 -40.45 N 78
Bore Hole No.: 01 Bore Hole No.: 02 Bore Hole No.: 03 Bore Hole No.: 04
CASTeR V8.10 - VC12UD-5: Developed By : Technology Development Centre

Report Sheet
Project : uuu
JP GEO CONSULTANTS Page 1 of 2

Borehole Name.: 01 Existing Ground Level(m): 0.000 Standing Water Level(m): 1.200
Type of Boring Auger with casing Wash without casing Commenced on : 03 July 2022 Completed on : 04 July 2022
Dia of Hole (mm): 150 150 Site :Aqua View (Konnagar)
Depth(m): 0.00-3.00 3.00-40.45 Job No. : 20317
Sample Type
SPT Record
Stratum
Sample
Depth in Meter Thickness Description of Strata SPT Curve Symbol
150-300
300-450
Depth(m)
0-150
0 20 40 60 78
Dark grey pond muck. I
0.00 To -2.00 2.00

-2
2.00 D
3.00 To 3.45 P 1 1 2 3
Soft grey clayey silt with fine mica flakes
-4
observed, note: pond water found up to II
1.20m and pond muck up to 2.00m depth.
4.50 To 4.95 U
-6
6.00 To 6.45 P 1 1 1 2 -2.00 To -6.50 4.50
7.50 To 7.95 U -8
9.00 To 9.45 P 2 2 3 5 Medium stiff grey to dark grey silty clay

III
with occasionally decomposed vegetation.
-10
10.50 To 10.95 U
-12
12.00 To 12.45 P 3 3 4 7 -6.50 To -12.50 6.00
13.50 To 13.95 U Stiff bluish grey silty clay with a few

-14 IV
calcereous nodules pieces.
15.00 To 15.45 P 4 6 6 12 -12.50 To -15.50 3.00
-16
16.50 To 16.95 U
Very stiff yellowish brown silty clay with
V
-18 few rusty brown spots.
18.00 To 18.45 P 6 8 10 18
19.50 To 19.95 U -15.50 To -20.00 4.50

-20
Medium dense to dense light brownish

VI
grey silty sand with fine mica particles.
21.00 To 21.45 P 9 11 13 24
-20.00 To -28.50 8.50 -22.00
D-Disturbed Sample, U-Undisturbed Sample, P-Standerd Penetration Test,C-Core, W-Water Sample, V-Vane Test Site Person-J.Halder
D:1 U:6 V:0 C:0 P:19 W: 0
Report Sheet
Project : uuu

Borehole Name.: 01 Existing Ground Level(m): 0.000 Standing Water Level(m): 1.200
Type of Boring Auger with casing Wash without casing Commenced on : 03 July 2022 Completed on : 04 July 2022
Depth(m): 0.00-3.00 3.00-40.45 Job No. : 20317
Sample Type
SPT Record
Stratum
Sample
150-300
300-450
Depth(m)
0-150
0 20 40 60 78
22.50 To 22.95 P 11 14 16 30
-24
24.00 To 24.45 P 12 16 20 36
VI
25.50 To 25.95 P 14 19 23 42 -26
27.00 To 27.45 P 17 23 26 49
-28
-20.00 To -28.50 8.50
28.50 To 28.95 P 18 24 26 50
-30
30.00 To 30.45 P 20 25 28 53
31.50 To 31.95 P 20 25 30 55 -32
33.00 To 33.45 P 22 26 30 56
-34
Very dense light brownish grey silty sand
VII
with mica particles.
34.50 To 34.95 P 23 30 33 63
-36
36.00 To 36.45 P 25 33 36 69
37.50 To 37.95 P 27 35 39 74 -38
-40
-28.50 To -40.45 11.95 -40.45
40.00 To 40.45 P 29 37 41 78
-42
D:1 U:6 V:0 C:0 P:19 W: 0
Report Sheet
Project : uuu

Borehole Name.: 02 Existing Ground Level(m): 0.000 Standing Water Level(m): -1.020
Type of Boring Auger with casing Wash without casing Commenced on : 22 June 2022 Completed on : 25 June 2022
Depth(m): 0.00-3.00 3.00-40.45 Job No. : 20317
Sample Type
SPT Record
Stratum
Sample
150-300
300-450
Depth(m)
0-150
0 20 40 60 80
81
0.50 D Fillings dark grey mixed soil rubbish, few
I
fly ash, concrit, brick bats and etc.
1.50 D
0.00 To -2.10 2.10 -2
3.00 To 3.45 P 2 2 3 5
-4 Soft to medium stiff grey to bluish grey
silty clay to clayey silt with fine mica II
4.50 To 4.95 P 1 2 3 5 flakes observed,.
-6
6.00 To 6.45 P 2 2 2 4
-2.10 To -7.00 4.90
7.50 To 7.95 U -8
9.00 To 9.45 P 1 1 2 3 Soft grey to dark grey silty clay with

III
-10 occasionally decomposed vegetation.
10.50 To 10.95 U
-12
12.00 To 12.45 P 1 2 2 4 -7.00 To -12.50 5.50
Stiff bluish grey silty clay with few

13.50 To 13.95 U -14 IV
15.00 To 15.45 P 4 5 7 12 -12.50 To -15.50 3.00
-16
16.50 To 16.95 U
-18
18.00 To 18.45 P 6 8 8 16 Very stiff yellowish brown silty clay to
V
clayey silt with few rusty brown spots.
19.50 To 19.95 U -20
21.00 To 21.45 P 9 11 13 24
-15.50 To -22.00 6.50 -22.00
D:2 U:5 V:0 C:0 P:20 W: 0
Report Sheet
Project : uuu

Depth(m): 0.00-3.00 3.00-40.45 Job No. : 20317
Sample Type
SPT Record
Stratum
Sample
150-300
300-450
Depth(m)
0-150
0 20 40 60 80
81
22.50 To 22.95 P 12 15 17 32
-24
24.00 To 24.45 P 13 16 19 35 Dense light brownish grey silty sand with
VI
fine mica particles.
25.50 To 25.95 P 16 20 24 44 -26
-22.00 To -27.00 5.00

27.00 To 27.45 P 19 24 27 51
-28
28.50 To 28.95 P 20 25 27 52
-30
30.00 To 30.45 P 21 26 29 55
31.50 To 31.95 P 22 26 30 56 -32
33.00 To 33.45 P 24 27 31 58 Very dense light brownish grey silty sand

VII
-34 with mica particles.
34.50 To 34.95 P 27 31 34 65
-36
36.00 To 36.45 P 33 35 37 72
37.50 To 37.95 P 33 37 41 78 -38
-40
-27.00 To -40.45 13.45 -40.45
40.00 To 40.45 P 35 39 42 81
-42
D:2 U:5 V:0 C:0 P:20 W: 0
Report Sheet
Project : uuu

Depth(m): 0.00-2.00 2.00-40.45 Job No. : 20317
Sample Type
SPT Record
Stratum
Sample
150-300
300-450
Depth(m)
0-150
0 20 40 60 80
82
0.50 D
1.00 D
-2
2.00 To 2.45 P 3 5 7 12 Fillings dark grey mixed soil rubbish, few
I
fly ash, concrit, brick bats and etc.
3.00 To 3.45 P 5 7 11 18
-4
4.50 To 4.95 P 7 10 15 25 0.00 To -5.00 5.00
Soft bluish grey clayey silt with few fine

II
-6 mica flakes observed,.
6.00 To 6.45 P 2 2 2 4 -5.00 To -6.60 1.60
7.50 To 7.95 U -8
9.00 To 9.45 P 1 1 2 3 Soft to medium stiff grey to dark grey silty

clay with decomposed vegetation, high% III
-10 decomposed/peat at 7.50m depth.
10.50 To 10.95 U
-12
12.00 To 12.45 P 1 2 3 5
-6.60 To -12.90 6.30
13.50 To 13.95 U -14

Medium stiff bluish grey silty clay with
IV
15.00 To 15.45 P 3 3 4 7
-12.90 To -15.90 3.00
-16
16.50 To 16.95 U
-18
18.00 To 18.45 P 5 6 8 14
Stiff to very stiff yellowish brown silty clay
V
to clayey silt with few rusty brown spots.
19.50 To 19.95 U -20
21.00 To 21.45 P 6 8 10 18
-15.90 To -22.90 7.00 -22.00
D:2 U:6 V:0 C:0 P:20 W: 0
Report Sheet
Project : uuu

Depth(m): 0.00-2.00 2.00-40.45 Job No. : 20317
Sample Type
SPT Record
Stratum
Sample
150-300
300-450
Depth(m)
0-150
Stiff to very stiff yellowish brown silty clay 0 20 40 60 80

82
22.00 To 22.45 U V
-15.90 To -22.90 7.00 to clayey silt with few rusty brown spots.
-24
24.00 To 24.45 P 9 13 17 30
Dense light brownish grey silty sand with
VI
fine mica particles.
25.50 To 25.95 P 16 18 24 42 -26
-22.90 To -27.40 4.50

27.00 To 27.45 P 17 22 27 49
-28
28.50 To 28.95 P 17 26 28 54
-30
30.00 To 30.45 P 18 28 32 60
31.50 To 31.95 P 19 29 33 62 -32
33.00 To 33.45 P 19 31 34 65
Very dense light brownish grey silty sand
-34 VII
with mica particles.
34.50 To 34.95 P 21 33 37 70
-36
36.00 To 36.45 P 24 35 39 74
37.50 To 37.95 P 27 37 40 77 -38
-27.40 To -40.35 12.95 -40 -40.35

40.00 To 40.35 P 31 39 43 82
-42
D:2 U:6 V:0 C:0 P:20 W: 0
Report Sheet
Project : uuu

Depth(m): 0.00-1.50 1.50-40.45 Job No. : 20317
Sample Type
SPT Record
Stratum
Sample
150-300
300-450
Depth(m)
0-150
0.00 To -0.60 0.60 I 0 20 40 60 78

0.50 D
1.50 To 1.95 P 1 1 2 3 -2
Soft to stiff light brownish grey clayey silt

3.00 To 3.45 P 6 6 7 13 II
with fine mica flakes observed,.
-4
4.50 To 4.95 P 2 3 3 6
-0.60 To -5.90 5.30

-6
6.00 To 6.45 U
7.50 To 7.95 P 2 2 3 5 -8
9.00 To 9.45 U
Soft to medium grey to dark grey silty clay
-10 III
with decomposed vegetation.
10.50 To 10.95 P 1 2 2 4
-12
12.00 To 12.45 U
13.50 To 13.95 P 2 3 3 6 -5.90 To -14.00 8.10

-14
Medium stiff bluish grey silty clay with

IV
15.00 To 15.45 U few calcereous nodules pieces.
-16
16.00 To 16.45 P 6 7 8 15 -14.00 To -16.50 2.50
-18
18.00 To 18.45 U
Medium stiff to very stiff yellowish brown
silty clay to clayey silt with fewfine mica V
flakes and rusty brown spots.
19.50 To 19.95 P 7 9 11 20 -20
21.00 To 21.45 U
-16.50 To -22.00 5.50 -22.00
D:1 U:6 V:0 C:0 P:20 W: 0
Report Sheet
Project : uuu

Depth(m): 0.00-1.50 1.50-40.45 Job No. : 20317
Sample Type
SPT Record
Stratum
Sample
150-300
300-450
Depth(m)
0-150
0 20 40 60 78
22.50 To 22.95 P 10 13 16 29
-24
24.00 To 24.45 P 12 15 17 32

VI
25.50 To 25.95 P 16 20 25 45 -26
27.00 To 27.45 P 17 21 27 48
-28
28.50 To 28.95 P 18 23 27 50 -22.00 To -29.00 7.00
-30
30.00 To 30.45 P 19 26 28 54
31.50 To 31.95 P 19 23 30 53 -32
33.00 To 33.45 P 21 24 32 56
-34
Very dense light brownish to bluish grey
VII
34.50 To 34.95 P 22 30 36 66 silty sand with mica particles.
-36
36.00 To 36.45 P 26 33 38 71
37.50 To 37.95 P 30 35 40 75 -38
-40
-29.00 To -40.45 11.45 -40.45
40.00 To 40.45 P 32 36 42 78
-42
D:1 U:6 V:0 C:0 P:20 W: 0
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS DENSITY

SHEAR TEST (kPa)
(%) (KN/m3)
Sampling Depth Natural
Liquid Plastic
Borehole (m) N- Moisture Unconfined Specific
Type Sample Limit Limit Unconsolidated Direct
No. Value Content Compression Gravity
No (%) (%) Undrained Shear
(%) Gravel Sand Silt Clay Test Bulk Dry
From To Undisturbed C Φ C Φ
U 3 4.50 4.95 28 36 22 7 78 15 26 4 18.00 14.00 2.65
U 5 7.50 7.95 29 68 23 1 65 34 28 18.20 14.10
U 7 10.50 10.95 29 66 23 1 67 32 37 1 18.50 14.30 2.64
U 9 13.50 13.95 26 58 20 3 1 69 27 45 19.00 15.10 2.67
U 11 16.50 16.95 24 52 19 2 73 25 82 2 19.40 15.60
U 13 19.50 19.95 22 48 19 4 71 25 92 19.80 16.20 2.67

1
P 15 22.50 22.95 30 NP NP 0.32 35
P 17 25.50 25.95 42 NP NP 83 17
P 19 28.50 28.95 50 NP NP 0.54 37
P 21 31.50 31.95 55 NP NP 87 13
P 23 34.50 34.95 63 NP NP 0.27 40
P 25 37.50 37.95 74 NP NP 95 5 2.69


SHEAR TEST (kPa)
(%) (KN/m3)
Liquid Plastic
P 4 4.50 4.95 5 NP NP 9 89 2 17.90 13.90 2.62
U 6 7.50 7.95 29 68 25 1 65 34 28 0 18.00 14.00
U 8 10.50 10.95 28 66 28 1 67 32 27 18.60 15.00 2.67
U 10 13.50 13.95 24 60 27 4 1 61 34 67 3 19.10 15.50
U 12 16.50 16.95 23 52 20 3 70 27 65 19.70 16.30 2.67
U 14 19.50 19.95 21 39 19 5 74 21 87 2
2 P 16 22.50 22.95 32 NP NP 0.2 36
P 18 25.50 25.95 44 NP NP 85 15
P 20 28.50 28.95 52 NP NP 0.33 38
P 22 31.50 31.95 56 NP NP 88 12 2.69
P 24 34.50 34.95 65 NP NP 0.45 40
P 26 37.50 37.95 78 NP NP 95 5
P 27 40.00 40.45 81 NP NP 97 3 0.94 41


SHEAR TEST (kPa)
(%) (KN/m3)
Liquid Plastic
P 6 6.00 6.45 4 45 22
U 7 7.50 7.95 70 130 50 0.5 63.5 36 28 0 16.80 9.90
U 9 10.50 10.95 30 67 25 1 63 36 31 18.10 13.90 2.62
U 11 13.50 13.95 25 60 20 5 2 63 30 37 3 18.90 15.10
U 13 16.50 16.95 23 50 19 3 72 25 54 19.30 15.70 2.66
U 15 19.50 19.95 22 47 18 4 73 23 74 19.60 16.00

3
U 17 22.50 22.95 21 38 18 7 73 20 98 3 20.00 16.50
P 19 25.50 25.95 42 NP NP 0.38 36
P 21 28.50 28.95 54 NP NP 86 14
P 23 31.50 31.95 62 NP NP 90 10
P 25 34.50 34.95 70 NP NP 0.47 38
P 27 37.50 37.95 77 NP NP 96 4


SHEAR TEST (kPa)
(%) (KN/m3)
Liquid Plastic
P 2 1.50 1.95 3 30 21 5 84 11
P 4 4.50 4.95 6 NP NP 8 90 2
U 5 6.00 6.45 30 70 24 1 63 36 32 0 18.00 13.80 2.58
U 7 9.00 9.45 42 88 32 0.5 63.5 36 27 17.90 12.60
U 9 12.00 12.45 29 68 23 1 65 34 31 1 18.30 14.20 2.62
U 11 15.00 15.45 24 60 20 3 1 63 33 40 18.60 15.00 2.67
U 13 18.00 18.45 23 52 19 2 71 27 79 19.50 15.80

4
U 15 21.00 21.45 21 38 18 5 76 19 95 20.00 16.50 2.67
P 17 24.00 24.45 32 NP NP 0.65 36
P 19 27.00 27.45 48 NP NP 85 15
P 21 30.00 30.45 54 NP NP 0.22 39
P 23 33.00 33.45 56 NP NP 88 12 2.69
P 25 36.00 36.45 71 NP NP 0.17 39
P 27 40.00 40.45 78 NP NP 96 4

CHEMICAL TEST RESULTS
Temp Chloride Chloride

Borehole Depth Type of PH Sulphate Sulphate
(0C)
Number (m) Sample Value (ppm) (%) SO3 (ppm) SO3 (%)
02 1.02 Water 30.3 7.6 108.843 0.0109 54.878 0.0055
03 1.0 Water 30.3 7.6 108.843 0.0109 54.878 0.0055
03 1.00 Soil 30.3 6.8 69.264 0.0069 ND ND
04 1.50-1.95 Soil 30.3 6.5 49.474 0.0049 ND ND
ND: NOT DETECTED

mv Value(m2/KN x 10-4)
Depth 00-10 10-25 25-50 50-100 100-200 200-400 400-800

BH No.
(m) Range (kPa)
1 4.50-4.95 2.25 2.60 3.00 3.30 3.07 2.29 1.44
1 10.50-10.95 2.00 2.20 2.60 3.05 2.88 2.21 1.41
1 13.50-13.95 1.00 1.40 1.50 1.75 1.60 1.21 0.84
1 19.50-19.95 0.75 1.10 1.20 1.48 1.35 0.99 0.65
2 7.50-7.95 2.50 2.80 3.20 3.65 3.37 2.41 1.55
2 13.50-13.95 1.00 1.30 1.50 1.68 1.53 1.05 0.67
2 19.50-19.95 0.50 1.00 1.20 1.30 1.17 0.85 0.56
3 10.50-10.95 2.10 2.30 2.70 3.10 2.92 2.24 1.41
3 16.50-16.95 1.25 1.50 1.70 1.95 1.75 1.36 0.90
4 6.00-6.45 2.00 2.24 2.60 3.00 2.83 2.21 1.39
4 15.00-15.45 1.20 1.50 1.70 1.95 1.83 1.26 0.79
4 21.00-21.45 0.50 0.90 1.15 1.25 1.10 0.81 0.52

DIRECT SHEAR TEST CURVE
Note: NMC-Natural Moisture Content (%), B.D. – Bulk Density (KN/m3), D.D. – Dry Density (KN/m3)
Sheet: 1 of 5
Sheet: 2 of 5
Sheet: 3 of 5
Sheet: 4 of 5
Sheet: 5 of 5
LOG TIME VS SETTLEMENT CURVE
1900
Dial Gauge Reading
1850
1800
1750
1700
1650
0.1 1 10 100 1000
Time in Minute (Log Scale)
0.25 -0.50 Kg /sq.cm 0.50 - 1.0 Kg / sq. cm 1.0 - 2.0 Kg / sq.cm

2.0 - 4.0 Kg / sq. cm 4.0 - 8.0 Kg / sq. cm
e log P CURVE
0.85
0.80
Void Ratio
0.75
0.70
0.65
0.60
10 100 1000
P- Pressure (Kg / sq. cm.)
mv Value(m2/KN x 10-4) / Pressure in kPa Compres

Initial void sion
Borehole No. Depth (m)
0-10 10-25 25-50 50-100 100-200 200-400 400-800 ratio (e0) Index
(CC)
1 10.50-10.95 2.00 2.20 2.60 3.05 2.88 2.21 1.41 0.85 0.17
JP Geo Consultants Job No.: 20317

1880
1860
Dial Gauge Reading
1840
1820
1800
1780
1760
1740
0.1 1 10 100 1000

2.0 - 4.0 Kg / sq. cm 4.0 - 8.0 Kg / sq. cm
e log P CURVE
0.79
0.77
0.75
Void Ratio
0.73
0.71
0.69
0.67
0.65
0.63
10 100 1000

Initial void sion
0-10 10-25 25-50 50-100 100-200 200-400 400-800 ratio (e0) Index
(CC)
1 13.50-13.95 1.00 1.40 1.50 1.75 1.60 1.21 0.84 0.77 0.10

1880
Dial Gauge Reading
1860
1840
1820
1800
1780
1760
0.1 1 10 100 1000

2.0 - 4.0 Kg / sq. cm 4.0 - 8.0 Kg / sq. cm
e log P CURVE
0.67
0.65
0.63
Void Ratio
0.61
0.59
0.57
0.55
10 100 1000

Initial void sion
0-10 10-25 25-50 50-100 100-200 200-400 400-800 ratio (e0) Index
(CC)
1 19.50-19.95 0.75 1.10 1.20 1.48 1.35 0.99 0.65 0.65 0.07

1900
Dial Gauge Reading
1850
1800
1750
1700
1650
0.1 1 10 100 1000

2.0 - 4.0 Kg / sq. cm 4.0 - 8.0 Kg / sq. cm
e log P CURVE
0.89
0.84
Void Ratio
0.79
0.74
0.69
0.64
10 100 1000

Initial void sion
0-10 10-25 25-50 50-100 100-200 200-400 400-800 ratio (e0) Index
(CC)
1 4.50-4.95 2.25 2.60 3.00 3.30 3.07 2.29 1.44 0.89 0.17

1890
1870
Dial Gauge Reading
1850
1830
1810
1790
1770
0.1 1 10 100 1000

2.0 - 4.0 Kg / sq. cm 4.0 - 8.0 Kg / sq. cm
e log P CURVE
0.79
0.77
0.75
Void Ratio
0.73
0.71
0.69
0.67
10 100 1000

Initial void sion
0-10 10-25 25-50 50-100 100-200 200-400 400-800 ratio (e0) Index
(CC)
2 13.50-13.95 1.00 1.30 1.50 1.68 1.53 1.05 0.67 0.78 0.07

1880
Dial Gauge Reading
1860
1840
1820
1800
1780
0.1 1 10 100 1000

2.0 - 4.0 Kg / sq. cm 4.0 - 8.0 Kg / sq. cm
e log P CURVE
0.65
0.64
0.63
0.62
Void Ratio
0.61
0.60
0.59
0.58
0.57
0.56
10 100 1000

Initial void sion
0-10 10-25 25-50 50-100 100-200 200-400 400-800 ratio (e0) Index
(CC)
2 19.50-19.95 0.50 1.00 1.20 1.30 1.17 0.85 0.56 0.64 0.06

1810
Dial Gauge Reading
1760
1710
1660
1610
1560
0.1 1 10 100 1000

2.0 - 4.0 Kg / sq. cm 4.0 - 8.0 Kg / sq. cm
e log P CURVE
0.93
0.88
0.83
Void Ratio
0.78
0.73
0.68
0.63
10 100 1000

Initial void sion
0-10 10-25 25-50 50-100 100-200 200-400 400-800 ratio (e0) Index
(CC)
2 7.50-7.95 2.50 2.80 3.20 3.65 3.37 2.41 1.55 0.88 0.18

1900
Dial Gauge Reading
1850
1800
1750
1700
1650
0.1 1 10 100 1000

2.0 - 4.0 Kg / sq. cm 4.0 - 8.0 Kg / sq. cm
e log P CURVE
0.89
0.84
Void Ratio
0.79
0.74
0.69
0.64
10 100 1000

Initial void sion
0-10 10-25 25-50 50-100 100-200 200-400 400-800 ratio (e0) Index
(CC)
3 10.50-10.95 2.10 2.30 2.70 3.10 2.92 2.24 1.41 0.88 0.17

1890
1870
Dial Gauge Reading
1850
1830
1810
1790
1770
1750
1730
0.1 1 10 100 1000

2.0 - 4.0 Kg / sq. cm 4.0 - 8.0 Kg / sq. cm
e log P CURVE
0.72
0.70
0.68
0.66
Void Ratio
0.64
0.62
0.60
0.58
0.56
10 100 1000

Initial void sion
0-10 10-25 25-50 50-100 100-200 200-400 400-800 ratio (e0) Index
(CC)
3 16.50-16.95 1.25 1.50 1.70 1.95 1.75 1.36 0.90 0.69 0.10

1880
1860
Dial Gauge Reading
1840
1820
1800
1780
1760
1740
0.1 1 10 100 1000

2.0 - 4.0 Kg / sq. cm 4.0 - 8.0 Kg / sq. cm
e log P CURVE
0.80
0.78
0.76
Void Ratio
0.74
0.72
0.70
0.68
0.66
10 100 1000

Initial void sion
0-10 10-25 25-50 50-100 100-200 200-400 400-800 ratio (e0) Index
(CC)
4 15.00-15.45 1.20 1.50 1.70 1.95 1.83 1.26 0.79 0.78 0.08

1890
1880
1870
Dial Gauge Reading
1860
1850
1840
1830
1820
1810
1800
1790
0.1 1 10 100 1000

2.0 - 4.0 Kg / sq. cm 4.0 - 8.0 Kg / sq. cm
e log P CURVE
0.62
0.61
0.60
0.59
Void Ratio
0.58
0.57
0.56
0.55
0.54
10 100 1000

Initial void sion
0-10 10-25 25-50 50-100 100-200 200-400 400-800 ratio (e0) Index
(CC)
4 21.00-21.45 0.50 0.90 1.15 1.25 1.10 0.81 0.52 0.62 0.05

1900
Dial Gauge Reading
1850
1800
1750
1700
1650
0.1 1 10 100 1000

2.0 - 4.0 Kg / sq. cm 4.0 - 8.0 Kg / sq. cm
e log P CURVE
0.89
0.84
Void Ratio
0.79
0.74
0.69
0.64
10 100 1000

Initial void sion
0-10 10-25 25-50 50-100 100-200 200-400 400-800 ratio (e0) Index
(CC)
4 6.00-6.45 2.00 2.24 2.60 3.00 2.83 2.21 1.39 0.88 0.17

Report Sheet
Project : uuu
JP Geo Consultants
0.8
0.7
Strain % at Failure
10.2 %-- Set 3
0.6 11.6 %-- Set 2
11.6 %-- Set 1
Dev.Stress(kg/cm^2)
-- Set No 3
0.5 -- Set No 2
-- Set No 1
Type of Test= U.U.
Depth=10.7M
0.4 Sample No. = 7
Bore Hole No.= 01
0.3

0.2
0.1
0
0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0
Strain(%)
Minor Principal Stress(kg/cm^2)

1.5 kg/cm^2-- Set 3
Shear Stress(kg/cm^2)
1.0 kg/cm^2-- Set 2

0.5 kg/cm^2-- Set 1
Major Pricipal stress(kg/cm^2)
2.3 kg/cm^2-- Set 3
1.8 kg/cm^2-- Set 2
1.3 kg/cm^2-- Set 1
Phi=1.210
C=0.370 Kg/cm^2
0
0
Normal Stress(kg/cm^2)
Report Sheet
Project : uuu
JP Geo Consultants
1.6
Strain % at Failure
11.2 %-- Set 3
11.9 %-- Set 2
12.5 %-- Set 1
Dev.Stress(kg/cm^2)
1.2 -- Set No 3
-- Set No 2
-- Set No 1
Type of Test= U.U.
Depth=16.7M
Sample No. = 11
Bore Hole No.= 01
0.8

0.4
0
0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0
Strain(%)

2.0 kg/cm^2-- Set 3
2.5 1.5 kg/cm^2-- Set 2

1.0 kg/cm^2-- Set 1
3.9 kg/cm^2-- Set 3
3.4 kg/cm^2-- Set 2
2.8 kg/cm^2-- Set 1
Phi=2.698
C=0.818 Kg/cm^2
0
0 2.5
Report Sheet
Project : uuu
JP Geo Consultants
0.7
0.6 Strain % at Failure

8.7 %-- Set 3
8.6 %-- Set 2
8.7 %-- Set 1
0.5
Dev.Stress(kg/cm^2)
-- Set No 3
-- Set No 2
-- Set No 1
Type of Test= U.U.
0.4 Depth=4.7M
Sample No. = 3
Bore Hole No.= 01
0.3

0.2
0.1
0
0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0
Strain(%)

1.5 kg/cm^2-- Set 3
1.0 kg/cm^2-- Set 2

0.5 kg/cm^2-- Set 1
2.3 kg/cm^2-- Set 3
1.7 kg/cm^2-- Set 2
1.1 kg/cm^2-- Set 1
Phi=3.698
C=0.257 Kg/cm^2
0
0
Report Sheet
Project : uuu
JP Geo Consultants
Strain % at Failure
1.2 12.2 %-- Set 3
12.0 %-- Set 2
12.4 %-- Set 1
Dev.Stress(kg/cm^2)
-- Set No 3
-- Set No 2
-- Set No 1
Type of Test= U.U.
0.8 Depth=13.7M
Sample No. = 10
Bore Hole No.= 02

0.4
0
0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0
Strain(%)
2.5

1.5 kg/cm^2-- Set 3
1.0 kg/cm^2-- Set 2

0.5 kg/cm^2-- Set 1
3.1 kg/cm^2-- Set 3
2.5 kg/cm^2-- Set 2
2.0 kg/cm^2-- Set 1
Phi=3.035
C=0.675 Kg/cm^2
0
0 2.5
Report Sheet
Project : uuu
JP Geo Consultants
1.6
Strain % at Failure
12.1 %-- Set 3
13.3 %-- Set 2
12.4 %-- Set 1
Dev.Stress(kg/cm^2)
-- Set No 3
1.2 -- Set No 2
-- Set No 1
Type of Test= U.U.
Depth=19.7M
Sample No. = 14
Bore Hole No.= 02
0.8

0.4
0
0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0
Strain(%)

2.0 kg/cm^2-- Set 3
2.5 1.5 kg/cm^2-- Set 2

1.0 kg/cm^2-- Set 1
4.0 kg/cm^2-- Set 3
3.4 kg/cm^2-- Set 2
2.9 kg/cm^2-- Set 1
Phi=1.819
C=0.879 Kg/cm^2
0
0 2.5
Report Sheet
Project : uuu
JP Geo Consultants
Strain % at Failure
7.6 %-- Set 3
8.0 %-- Set 2
0.4 8.4 %-- Set 1
Dev.Stress(kg/cm^2)
-- Set No 3
-- Set No 2
-- Set No 1
Type of Test= U.U.
Depth=7.7M
Sample No. = 6
Bore Hole No.= 02

0.2
0
0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0
Strain(%)

1.5 kg/cm^2-- Set 3
1.0 kg/cm^2-- Set 2

0.5 kg/cm^2-- Set 1
2.1 kg/cm^2-- Set 3
1.6 kg/cm^2-- Set 2
1.1 kg/cm^2-- Set 1
Phi=0.369
C=0.279 Kg/cm^2
0
0
Report Sheet
Project : uuu
JP Geo Consultants
Strain % at Failure
9.6 %-- Set 3
11.3 %-- Set 2
0.6 11.0 %-- Set 1
Dev.Stress(kg/cm^2)
-- Set No 3
-- Set No 2
-- Set No 1
Type of Test= U.U.
Depth=13.7M
Sample No. = 11
Bore Hole No.= 03

0.3
0
0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0
Strain(%)

1.5 kg/cm^2-- Set 3
1.0 kg/cm^2-- Set 2

0.5 kg/cm^2-- Set 1
2.4 kg/cm^2-- Set 3
1.9 kg/cm^2-- Set 2
1.3 kg/cm^2-- Set 1
Phi=2.676
C=0.370 Kg/cm^2
0
0 2.5
Report Sheet
Project : uuu
JP Geo Consultants
2.0
Strain % at Failure
10.0 %-- Set 3
11.9 %-- Set 2
13.3 %-- Set 1
1.6
Dev.Stress(kg/cm^2)
-- Set No 3
-- Set No 2
-- Set No 1
Type of Test= U.U.
1.2 Depth=22.2M
Sample No. = 17
Bore Hole No.= 03

0.8
0.4
0
0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0
Strain(%)

2.5 kg/cm^2-- Set 3
2.0 kg/cm^2-- Set 2

1.5 kg/cm^2-- Set 1
4.9 kg/cm^2-- Set 3
2.5 4.3 kg/cm^2-- Set 2
3.7 kg/cm^2-- Set 1
Phi=2.873
C=0.993 Kg/cm^2
0
0 2.5 5.0
Report Sheet
Project : uuu
JP Geo Consultants
Strain % at Failure
8.4 %-- Set 3
8.4 %-- Set 2
0.4 9.0 %-- Set 1
Dev.Stress(kg/cm^2)
-- Set No 3
-- Set No 2
-- Set No 1
Type of Test= U.U.
Depth=7.7M
Sample No. = 7
Bore Hole No.= 03

0
0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0
Strain(%)

1.5 kg/cm^2-- Set 3
1.0 kg/cm^2-- Set 2

0.5 kg/cm^2-- Set 1
2.1 kg/cm^2-- Set 3
1.6 kg/cm^2-- Set 2
1.1 kg/cm^2-- Set 1
Phi=0.367
C=0.278 Kg/cm^2
0
0
Report Sheet
Project : uuu
JP Geo Consultants
0.6
Strain % at Failure
8.6 %-- Set 3
8.5 %-- Set 2
8.9 %-- Set 1
Dev.Stress(kg/cm^2)
-- Set No 3
0.4 -- Set No 2
-- Set No 1
Type of Test= U.U.
Depth=12.2M
Sample No. = 9
Bore Hole No.= 04

0.2
0
0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0
Strain(%)

1.5 kg/cm^2-- Set 3
1.0 kg/cm^2-- Set 2

0.5 kg/cm^2-- Set 1
2.2 kg/cm^2-- Set 3
1.6 kg/cm^2-- Set 2
1.1 kg/cm^2-- Set 1
Phi=0.552
C=0.312 Kg/cm^2
0
0
Report Sheet
Project : uuu
JP Geo Consultants
Strain % at Failure
8.6 %-- Set 3
8.7 %-- Set 2
8.9 %-- Set 1
Dev.Stress(kg/cm^2)
-- Set No 3
0.4 -- Set No 2
-- Set No 1
Type of Test= U.U.
Depth=7.7M
Sample No. = 6
Bore Hole No.= 04

0
0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0
Strain(%)

1.5 kg/cm^2-- Set 3
1.0 kg/cm^2-- Set 2

0.5 kg/cm^2-- Set 1
2.2 kg/cm^2-- Set 3
1.6 kg/cm^2-- Set 2
1.1 kg/cm^2-- Set 1
Phi=0.344
C=0.316 Kg/cm^2
0
0
GRAIN SIZE CURVE
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
Percentage Finer Than(%)
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)
Grain Size Analysis(%)

Borehole No. Area Depth(m)
Gravel Sand Silt Clay
1 Aqua View 4.50-4.95 0.00 7.10 78.04 14.86
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

1 Aqua View 7.50-7.95 0.00 0.80 65.47 33.73
GRAIN SIZE CURVE
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

1 Aqua View 10.50-10.95 0.00 0.70 67.52 31.78
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Seive Size(mm)

1 Aqua View 13.50-13.95 3.00 1.10 69.05 26.85
GRAIN SIZE CURVE
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

1 Aqua View 16.50-16.95 0.00 1.90 72.59 25.51
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

1 Aqua View 19.50-19.95 0.00 3.60 71.34 25.06
GRAIN SIZE CURVE
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

1 Aqua View 25.50-25.95 0.00 83.00 17.00 0.00
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

1 Aqua View 31.50-31.95 0.00 87.00 13.00 0.00
GRAIN SIZE CURVE
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

1 Aqua View 37.50-37.95 0.00 94.90 5.10 0.00
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

2 Aqua View 4.50-4.95 0.00 9.20 88.98 1.82
GRAIN SIZE CURVE
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

2 Aqua View 7.50-7.95 0.00 0.60 65.60 33.80
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

2 Aqua View 10.50-10.95 0.00 0.80 67.46 31.74
GRAIN SIZE CURVE
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Seive Size(mm)

2 Aqua View 13.50-13.95 4.00 0.70 60.99 34.31
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

2 Aqua View 16.50-16.95 0.00 3.30 69.62 27.08
GRAIN SIZE CURVE
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

2 Aqua View 19.50-19.95 0.00 5.00 74.10 20.90
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

2 Aqua View 25.50-25.95 0.00 84.60 15.40 0.00
GRAIN SIZE CURVE
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

2 Aqua View 31.50-31.95 0.00 88.00 12.00 0.00
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

2 Aqua View 37.50-37.95 0.00 95.30 4.70 0.00
GRAIN SIZE CURVE
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

2 Aqua View 40.00-40.45 0.00 96.90 3.10 0.00
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

3 Aqua View 7.50-7.95 0.00 0.50 63.68 35.82
GRAIN SIZE CURVE
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

3 Aqua View 10.50-10.95 0.00 0.70 63.55 35.75
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Seive Size(mm)

3 Aqua View 13.50-13.95 5.00 1.70 63.44 29.86
GRAIN SIZE CURVE
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

3 Aqua View 16.50-16.95 0.00 3.10 71.71 25.19
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

3 Aqua View 19.50-19.95 0.00 3.70 73.19 23.11
GRAIN SIZE CURVE
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

3 Aqua View 22.50-22.95 0.00 7.10 72.46 20.44
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

3 Aqua View 28.50-28.95 0.00 86.20 13.80 0.00
GRAIN SIZE CURVE
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

3 Aqua View 31.50-31.95 0.00 89.80 10.20 0.00
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

3 Aqua View 37.50-37.95 0.00 96.00 4.00 0.00
GRAIN SIZE CURVE
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

4 Aqua View 1.50-1.95 0.00 5.20 83.42 11.38
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

4 Aqua View 4.50-4.95 0.00 8.00 90.16 1.84
GRAIN SIZE CURVE
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

4 Aqua View 6.00-6.45 0.00 0.70 63.55 35.75
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

4 Aqua View 9.00-9.45 0.00 0.50 63.68 35.82
GRAIN SIZE CURVE
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

4 Aqua View 12.00-12.45 0.00 0.70 65.54 33.76
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Seive Size(mm)

4 Aqua View 15.00-15.45 3.00 0.70 63.56 32.74
GRAIN SIZE CURVE
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

4 Aqua View 18.00-18.45 0.00 2.10 70.49 27.41
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

4 Aqua View 21.00-21.45 0.00 4.70 76.24 19.06
GRAIN SIZE CURVE
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

4 Aqua View 27.00-27.45 0.00 84.80 15.20 0.00
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

4 Aqua View 33.00-33.45 0.00 88.00 12.00 0.00
GRAIN SIZE CURVE
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Seive Size(mm)

4 Aqua View 40.00-40.45 0.00 96.00 4.00 0.00

Soil Test Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Soil Test Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Soil Test Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT

M/S BHAWANI URBAN HOUSING

REG. OFFICE- 66, ANDUL ROAD, HOWRAH – 711 109

The Geo-technical investigation was awarded by M/S Bhawani Urban Housing

2.0 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

3.0 INVESTIGATION SCHEME AND LOCATION OF TESTS

Sketch showing location of boreholes is given in the following page

BORE HOLE LOCATION PLAN

4.2.1 COLLECTION OF UN-DISTURBED SAMPLES

5.0 LABORATORY TESTS

ii) Atterberg Limits

iv) Direct Shear Test

vi) Consolidation Test

vii) Natural Moisture Content

viii) Bulk Density and Dry Density

JP GEO CONSULTANTS Job No. 20317

7.0 ENGINEERING APPRAISAL & RECOMMENDATIONS

7.1 OPEN FOUNDATIONS

7.2 PILE FOUNDATION

7.2.1 DISCUSSION ON ESTIMATION OF LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY OF

600 1700 1000 30.50 35.00

Lateral Load Carrying Capacities of Piles

9.0 GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS

FOR JP Geo Consultants

CASTeR V8.10 - VC12UD-5: Developed By : Technology Development Centre

JP GEO CONSULTANTS Page 1 of 2

Dark grey pond muck. I

0.00 To -2.00 2.00

9.00 To 9.45 P 2 2 3 5 Medium stiff grey to dark grey silty clay

13.50 To 13.95 U Stiff bluish grey silty clay with a few

15.00 To 15.45 P 4 6 6 12 -12.50 To -15.50 3.00

19.50 To 19.95 U -15.50 To -20.00 4.50

Medium dense to dense light brownish

JP GEO CONSULTANTS Page 2 of 2

31.50 To 31.95 P 20 25 30 55 -32

37.50 To 37.95 P 27 35 39 74 -38

JP GEO CONSULTANTS Page 1 of 2

9.00 To 9.45 P 1 1 2 3 Soft grey to dark grey silty clay with

Stiff bluish grey silty clay with few

15.00 To 15.45 P 4 5 7 12 -12.50 To -15.50 3.00

19.50 To 19.95 U -20

JP GEO CONSULTANTS Page 2 of 2

25.50 To 25.95 P 16 20 24 44 -26

-22.00 To -27.00 5.00

31.50 To 31.95 P 22 26 30 56 -32

33.00 To 33.45 P 24 27 31 58 Very dense light brownish grey silty sand

37.50 To 37.95 P 33 37 41 78 -38

JP GEO CONSULTANTS Page 1 of 2

4.50 To 4.95 P 7 10 15 25 0.00 To -5.00 5.00

Soft bluish grey clayey silt with few fine

9.00 To 9.45 P 1 1 2 3 Soft to medium stiff grey to dark grey silty

13.50 To 13.95 U -14

19.50 To 19.95 U -20

JP GEO CONSULTANTS Page 2 of 2

Stiff to very stiff yellowish brown silty clay 0 20 40 60 80

-22.90 To -27.40 4.50

31.50 To 31.95 P 19 29 33 62 -32

37.50 To 37.95 P 27 37 40 77 -38

-27.40 To -40.35 12.95 -40 -40.35