1 Week Sumary

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Formal Logic vs.

Informal Logic

 Logic is a science that helps us tell the difference between good and
bad arguments.

 Formal logic focuses on the patterns of reasoning in arguments. It


looks at general rules that make arguments valid (correct) or invalid
(incorrect).

 Informal logic sees arguments as a part of language, something we


do with words in real situations. It studies how arguments are used
in everyday conversations.

Reason, Justification, and Argument

 We come across arguments all the time, like when we talk, read, or
think. People are constantly trying to tell us what to do or believe,
and when we ask "Why?", we're asking for a reason or justification
for it.

 A good reason is one that should make us act or believe in what


someone suggests. Giving good reasons is called making an
argument.

 Not all attempts to convince people are arguments. Arguments try to


give reasons, but some attempts (like emotional manipulation)
don’t.

Conclusion and Premises

 The conclusion of an argument is the main point the person wants to


prove.

 The premises are the reasons or evidence that support the


conclusion.

 It’s important to identify both the premises and conclusion to


understand an argument. Sometimes people don’t state all their
premises clearly, so we need to figure out what they mean by
reconstructing the argument.

Argument Analysis

 After identifying an argument, we check if the reasons given are


good enough to support the conclusion. This process is called
evaluating the argument.

 Argument analysis involves reconstructing the argument and then


evaluating it. You can also evaluate arguments in your own
thoughts.
 Arguments aren’t just about winning. They help us figure out the
most reasonable belief on a topic.

Rhetorical Force vs. Rational Strength

 Some arguments are convincing because they are rhetorically


powerful (they use emotional or striking examples), but that doesn’t
mean they’re logically strong.

 Rational strength means the argument gives good reasons to believe


the conclusion, even if it doesn’t persuade everyone.

Critical Thinking

 Rational thinkers can tell the difference between arguments and


non-arguments, understand arguments, and evaluate them fairly.

 They also have certain attitudes: they are open-minded, willing to


change their minds if the arguments are good, and able to form
beliefs even when things are uncertain.

Abilities and Attitudes of a Rational Thinker

 Rational thinkers have certain skills and ways of thinking that help
them deal with arguments effectively.

Key Abilities:

1. Knowing what an argument is: They can tell when someone is


making a real argument and when they are not.

2. Understanding arguments: They can read or listen to an argument


and understand what it means.

3. Judging arguments: They can decide if the argument is good or bad,


based on careful and fair thinking.

The first two abilities need thoughtful reading and listening. The
third requires being fair and open-minded when judging arguments.

Important Attitudes:

1. Being open-minded: They are willing to look at arguments from all


sides.

2. Being ready to change their mind: If the argument is strong, they


are willing to accept new ideas, even if it means letting go of their
old beliefs.

3. Letting go of popular beliefs: If an argument shows that a common


belief is wrong, they are ready to give it up.
4. Accepting popular beliefs: If an argument supports a widely
accepted belief, they are willing to go along with it.

5. Dealing with uncertainty: They can form opinions even when things
aren’t clear.

Good Arguments vs. Bad Arguments:

 Not all arguments are good. To tell the difference, we need to


carefully analyze them. But before doing this, we first need to figure
out whether the person is actually trying to convince us with an
argument.

Types of Arguments:

 Arguments about opinions: Sometimes, an argument is about a


belief, like “I think this is true.”

 Arguments about actions: Other times, it’s about suggesting what


we should do, like “You should stop using plastic.”

Even though these two types seem different, they’re connected. For
example, if someone argues that you should use less plastic, they’re
also saying, “It’s true that using less plastic is a good thing.”

Truth in Arguments:

 Truth means what a claim says matches reality. For example, if


someone says “New York is farther from Istanbul than Berlin is,” it’s
true if New York really is farther.

But one claim alone doesn’t make an argument. An argument needs


multiple claims: one that the person is trying to prove, and at least
one more to support that claim.

Supported vs. Unsupported Claims

 A single statement (claim) isn’t an argument by itself. To make an


argument, you need reasons (premises) to support the claim
(conclusion).

 For example, if someone says "The world is facing an environmental


catastrophe," that’s just a claim. But if they add reasons, like
"Scientists have collected data showing this," it becomes an
argument.

Language and Arguments

 Arguments rely on language, and language is based on conventions


(rules). We use words to communicate information, ask questions,
give orders, and make arguments.
 Misunderstanding how language works can lead to unnecessary
disagreements, like when someone says, "It’s just a matter of
definition." While definitions are sometimes important, most of the
time, truth depends on the actual facts in the world.

Exceptions

 Sometimes the truth is based on definitions, like "A triangle has


three sides" or "A sin is something wrong." But generally, truth
comes from facts, not just definitions.

You might also like