Communication Models
Communication Models
According to Denis McQuail’s book Mass Communication Theory, “a model is a selective representation in
verbal or diagrammatic form of some aspect of the dynamic process of mass communication.”
In other words, models of communication provide us with a visual representation of the different aspects
of a communication situation.
Since communication is a complex process, it’s often challenging to determine where a conversation begins
and ends.
The linear communication model is straightforward and used mainly in marketing, sales, and PR, in
communication with customers.
Linear communication models suggest that communication takes place only in one direction.
The channel,
The receiver.
Some linear models of communication also mention noise as one of the factors that have a role in the
communication process. Noise acts as the added (background) element that usually distracts from the original
message.
But, we’ll talk more about the role of noise in the communication process later on. For now, let’s start with the
basic elements of the linear communication model.
As illustrated in the linear communication model diagram below, this communication model is pretty
straightforward.
The channel, as the medium, changes the message into speech, writing, or animation.
The message then finally reaches the receiver, who decodes it.
Aristotle’s model of communication primarily focuses on the sender (public speaker, professor, etc.) who
passes on their message to the receiver (the audience).
The sender is also the only active member in this model, whereas the audience is passive. This makes
Aristotle’s communication model a foolproof way to excel in public speaking, seminars, and lectures.
1. Ethos — Defines the credibility of the speaker. Speaker gains credibility, authority, and power by being
an expert in a field of their choice.
2. Pathos — Connects the speaker with the audience through different emotions (anger, sadness,
happiness, etc.)
3. Logos — Signifies logic. Namely, it is not enough for the speech to be interesting — it needs to follow
the rules of logic.
As shown in Aristotle’s communication model diagram below, Aristotle also suggested that we look at 5
components of a communication situation to analyze the best way to communicate:
Speaker,
Speech,
Occasion,
Effect.
She delivers her speech persuasively, in a manner that leaves her students mesmerized.
The professor is at the center of attention, whereas her audience — her students — are merely passive
listeners. Nevertheless, her message influences them and makes them act accordingly.
So, in this situation, professor Hustvedt is the speaker, and her lecture on disorders is the act of speech.
The occasion in question is a university lecture, while the students are her target audience.
The effect of her speech is the students gaining knowledge on this subject matter.
One of the major drawbacks of this model is that it does not pay attention to the feedback in communication
because the audience is passive.
Lasswell’s communication model views communication as the transmission of a message with the effect as the
result.
The effect in this case is the measurable and obvious change in the receiver of the message that is caused by
the elements of communication.
If any of the elements change, the effect also changes.
Lasswell’s model aims to answer the following 5 questions regarding its elements:
The answers to these questions offer us the main components of this model:
Communicator,
Message,
Medium,
Audience/Receiver, and
Effect.
He is promoting his brand of suitcases as the best. Aware that millions of viewers are watching his
presentation, Mr. Sanders is determined to leave a remarkable impression.
By doing so, he is achieving brand awareness, promoting his product as the best on the market, and
consequently increasing sales revenue.
The message he is conveying is the promotion of his brand of suitcases as the best.
The effect he is achieving by doing this is raising brand awareness and increasing sales revenue.
Strangely enough, Shannon and Weaver were mathematicians, who developed their work during the Second
World War in the Bell Telephone Laboratories. They aimed to discover which channels are most effective for
communicating.
So, although they were doing research as part of their engineering endeavors, they claimed that their theory is
applicable to human communication as well.
Sender,
Encoder,
Channel,
Decoder, and
Receiver.
“Anything that is added to the signal between its transmission and reception that is not intended by the
source.”
The noise appears in the form of mishearing a conversation, misspelling an email, or static on a radio
broadcast.
She wants a detailed study of the competitor’s activity by the end of the week.
Unfortunately, while she was speaking, her assistant Peter interrupted her, and she forgot to tell Julian about
the most important issue.
At the end of the week, Julian did finish the report, but there were some mistakes, which had to be corrected
later on.
Julian’s ears and brain were decoders, and Julian was the receiver.
The trouble in this process was the lack of feedback. Had Julian asked Paula for clarification after Peter
interrupted her, the whole communication process would have been more effective, and there would have
been no mistakes.
Updated version of the Shannon-Weaver communication model
Since the original version didn’t include it, the principle of feedback was added to the updated version, so the
model provided a more truthful representation of human interaction.
The concept of feedback was derived from the studies of Norbert Wiener, the so-called father of cybernetics.
Simply put, feedback is the transfer of the receiver’s reaction back to the sender.
It allows the speaker to modify their performance according to the reaction of the audience.
Maybe the most important function of feedback is the fact that it helps the receiver feel involved in the
communication process.
That makes the receiver more receptive to the message because they feel their opinion is being taken into
account.
This communication model is unique in the sense that it gives a detailed account of the key elements in each
step.
Simply put, Berlo’s S-M-C-R communication model is a linear model of communication that suggests
communication is the transfer of information between 4 basic steps or key elements.
What are the main elements of Berlo’s Berlo’s S-M-C-R communication model?
As shown in Berlo’s S-M-C-R communication model diagram below, these steps are the following:
1. Source,
2. Message,
3. Channel, and
4. Receiver.
Let’s consider the key elements that affect how well the message is communicated, starting with the source.
Communication skills — First and foremost, the source needs good communication skills to ensure
the communication will be effective. The speaker should know when to pause, what to repeat, how to
pronounce a word, etc.
Attitude — Secondly, the source needs the right attitude. Without it, not even a great speaker would
ever emerge as a winner. The source needs to make a lasting impression on the receiver(s).
Knowledge — Here, knowledge does not refer to educational qualifications but to the clarity of the
information that the source wants to transfer to the receiver.
Social system — The source should be familiar with the social system in which the communication
process takes place. That would help the source not to offend anyone.
Culture — Last but not least, to achieve effective communication, the source needs to be acquainted
with the culture in which the communication encounter is taking place. This is especially important
for cross-cultural communication.
Elements — Speech alone is not enough for the message to be fully understood. That is why other
elements have to be taken into account: gestures, body language, facial expressions, etc.
Treatment — The way the source treats the message. They have to be aware of the importance of the
message so that they can convey it appropriately.
Structure — The source has to properly structure the message to ensure the receiver will understand it
correctly.
Code — All the elements, verbal and nonverbal, need to be accurate if you do not want your message
to get distorted and misinterpreted.
Berlo’s S-M-C-R communication model identifies all our senses are the channels that help us communicate
with one another.
Through our sense of taste, we gather information about the spiciness of a sauce we are eating.
To understand the message, the receiver should involve the same elements as the source. They should have
similar communication skills, attitudes, and knowledge, and be acquainted with the social system and culture in
which they communicate.
Berlo’s S-M-C-R communication model example
Watching the news on television is the perfect example of Berlo’s S-M-C-R Model of communication.
In this case, the news presenter is the source of the news and they convey the message to the audience.
The news is the message, the television is the channel, and the audience are the receivers of the message.
As more dynamic models, interactive communication models refer to two-way communication with feedback.
However, feedback within interactive communication models is not simultaneous, but rather slow and indirect.
The main elements of these models, illustrated in the interactive communication model diagram, include the
following:
Sender,
Message,
Receiver,
Feedback, and
Field of experience.
You probably noticed the new, previously not seen element — field of experience.
The field of experience represents a person’s culture, past experiences, and personal history.
All of these factors influence how the sender constructs a message, as well as how the receiver interprets it.
Every one of us brings a unique field of experience into communication situations.
The Osgood-Schramm model is a circular model of communication, in which messages go in two directions
between encoding and decoding.
As such, this model is useful for describing synchronous, interpersonal communication, but less suitable for
cases with little or no feedback.
Interestingly, in the Osgood-Schramm communication model, there is no difference between a sender and a
receiver. Both parties are equally encoding and decoding the messages. The interpreter is the person trying to
understand the message at that moment.
Furthermore, the Osgood-Schramm communication model shows that information is of no use until it is put into
words and conveyed to other people.
What are the main principles and steps in the communication process according to this model?
1. Communication is circular. — Individuals involved in the communication process are changing their
roles as encoders and decoders.
2. Communication is equal and reciprocal. — Both parties are equally engaged as encoders and
decoders.
3. The message requires interpretation. — The information needs to be properly interpreted to be
understood.
4. As shown in the Osgood-Schramm communication model diagram below, this model proposes 3 steps
in the process of communication:
Encoding,
Decoding, and
Interpreting.
In this example, you and your friend are equally encoding and decoding messages, and your communication is
synchronous. You are both interpreting each other’s messages.
“It is misleading to think of the communication process as starting somewhere and ending somewhere. It is
really endless. We are really switchboard centers handling and re-routing the great endless current of
information.”
6. The Westley and Maclean model of communication
The next interactive communication model on our list is the Westley and Maclean model of communication.
The Westley and Maclean communication model suggests that the communication process does not start with
the source/sender, but rather with environmental factors.
This model also takes into account the object of the orientation (background, culture, and beliefs) of the sender
and the receiver of messages.
The very process of communication, according to this communication model, starts with environmental factors
that influence the speaker — the culture or society the speaker lives in, whether the speaker is in a public or
private space, etc.
What are the main elements of the Westley and Maclean communication model?
1. Environment (X),
2. Sensory experience (X¹),
3. Source/Sender (A),
4. The object of the orientation of the source (X²),
5. Receiver (B),
6. The object of the orientation of the receiver (X³),
7. Feedback (F),
8. Gatekeepers (C), and
9. Opinion leaders.
This is the type of stimulus that would nudge you to call your friends and tell them about what you had seen, or
call your boss to say you are going to be a bit late.
So, the communication process in this example does not start with you, but with the road accident you have
witnessed.
Acknowledgment of the environmental factors in communication, therefore, allows us to pay attention to the
social and cultural contexts that influence our acts of communication.
Now that we have seen what the elements of communication in this model are, let’s look at all of them in
greater detail.
In the example above, the sensory experience would be witnessing a road accident.
In the above-mentioned example, you are the sender, as well as a participant in the interpersonal
communication situation.
However, a sender can also be a newscaster sending a message to millions of viewers. In that case, we are
talking about mass communication.
Namely, the object of the orientation of the source is the sender’s beliefs or experiences.
If we take the previously-mentioned road accident as an example, you (A) are concerned (X²) that you are
going to be late for work because of the accident (X¹), and that is why you are calling your boss (B).
In mass communication, a receiver is a person who watches TV, reads a newspaper, etc.
When speaking about interpersonal communication, a receiver is a person who listens to the message.
In the example of a road accident, mentioned above, the receivers of the message are your friends and your
boss.
For example, your friend (B) watching the news is worried about your safety (X³) after receiving the message.
That means that a receiver and a gatekeeper are sending messages back to the sender.
After they have received the feedback, the sender modifies the message and sends it back.
So, you have witnessed the accident and feel the urge to call your best friend.
You: “No, no, I just witnessed it. I wasn’t involved! Don’t worry!”
In this example, after the feedback from your worried friend, you modify your message and send it back to
them.
Element #8: Gatekeepers (C)
This element usually occurs in mass communication, rather than in interpersonal communication.
Gatekeepers are editors of the messages senders are trying to communicate to receivers.
For example, these are newspaper editors who edit the message before it reaches the readers.
Namely, opinion leaders have an immense influence as an environmental factor (X) on the sender of the
message (A).
Aside from that, transactional models show that we do not just exchange information during our interactions,
but create relationships, form cross-cultural bonds, and shape our opinions.
Social,
Relational, and
Cultural contexts.
Moreover, these models acknowledge that there are barriers to effective communication — noise.
If we take a look at the transactional communication model diagram below, we can identify the key
components of this communication model:
Encoding,
Decoding,
Communicators,
The message,
Noise.
Barnlund’s model of communication recognizes that communication is a circular process and a multi-
layered feedback system between the sender and the receiver, both of whom can affect the message
being sent.
The sender and the receiver change their places and are equally important. Feedback from the sender is the
reply for the receiver, and both communicators provide feedback.
At the same time, both sender and receiver are responsible for the communication’s effect and effectiveness.
Barnlund’s transactional communication model diagram below illustrates the following main components of this
communication model:
Encoding,
Decoding,
Communicators,
The channel.
Barnlund’s communication
model diagram
All these cues, as well as the environment and noise, are part of the message. Each communicator’s reaction
depends on their background, experiences, attitudes, and beliefs.
Face-to-face interactions,
Chat sessions,
Telephone conversations,
Meetings, etc.
An example that shows a misunderstanding due to the cultural differences in celebrating certain holidays (Pumble
business messaging app)
Why was there a misunderstanding in this conversation even though everything seemed fine at first glance?
Namely, Catherine had thought that Irene wanted a day off on July 4th.
However, Irene comes from Canada and celebrates Independence Day on July 1st.
On that day, she does not show up at work to Catherine’s bewilderment, because she has expected Irene to
take a day off on July 4th, on US Independence Day.
Still, this misunderstanding could have easily been avoided, had they cleared up the dates by providing each
other with feedback.
Therefore, each communication encounter is different from the previous one because communication never
repeats itself.
Dance’s Helical communication model views communication as a circular process that gets more and more
complex as communication progresses.
That is why it is represented by a helical spiral in the Dance’s Helical communication model diagram below.
In their book Communication: Principles for a Lifetime, Steven A. Beebe, Susan J. Beebe, and Diana K. Ivy
state:
“Interpersonal communication is irreversible. Like the spiral shown here, communication never loops back on
itself. Once it begins, it expands infinitely as the communication partners contribute their thoughts and
experiences to the exchange.”
Steven A. Beebe, Susan J. Beebe, Diana K. Ivy
According to this communication model, in the communication process, the feedback we get from the other
party involved influences our next statement and we become more knowledgeable with every new cycle.
Namely, a person starts to communicate with their surroundings very early on, using rudimentary methods of
communication.
For instance, as babies, we cry to get our mothers’ attention. Later on, we learn to speak in words, and then in
full sentences.
During the whole process, we build on what we know to improve our communication.
Every communication act is, therefore, a chance for us to learn how to communicate more effectively in the
future, and feedback helps us achieve more effective communication.
In a way, our whole life is one communicational journey toward the top of Dance’s helix.
Download
However, models of communication can still help us examine the steps in the process of communication, so
we can better understand how we communicate both in the workplace and outside of it.
In this guide, we have covered the most important models of communication, divided into 3 categories:
Linear models — Mainly used in marketing, sales, and PR, in communication with customers, these
models view communication as a one-way process.
Interactive models — Used in internet-based and mediated communication, they refer to two-way
communication with indirect feedback.
Transactional models — The most complex models of communication, which best reflect the
communication process.
Although none of these models represent our communication 100%, they can help us detect and solve
potential problems and improve our communication skills.
Download