Discover Sustainability

Discover Sustainability
Case Study
Stakeholder engagement in advancing sustainable ecotourism:

an exploratory case study of Chilika Wetland
Rajashree Samal1 · Madhusmita Dash1
Received: 12 January 2024 / Accepted: 21 March 2024
© The Author(s) 2024 OPEN
Abstract
Ecotourism, over time, has emerged as a preferred strategy for resource utilization within protected areas of develop-
ing nations, as it effectively bridges the gap between ecological conservation imperatives and the imperative for local
economic development. This study aims to comprehensively analyze the multifaceted impacts of ecotourism on local
communities, with due consideration given to its environmental, social, and economic dimensions. Furthermore, the
research endeavors to evaluate the degree of stakeholder engagement in fostering sustainable tourism practices within
ecotourism initiatives. Thematic content analysis has been used and the data for the analysis has been sourced through
field observations, key informant discussions and different secondary sources. This research examines the dynamic
interaction between local communities and ecotourism aspects in the Chilika Wetland in India, using the DPSIR (Driver-
Pressure-State-Impact-Response) framework. It promotes a comprehensive decision-making method that considers
the Triple Bottom Line and Community-oriented Collaborative approach. Findings underscore the potential for Chilika’s
ecosystem restoration and mitigating adverse tourist impacts with effective ecotourism governance. The need for col-
laboration among stakeholders becomes crucial for the effective administration of ecotourism, as shown by the instance
of Mangalajodi, which exemplifies the successful outcome of community-led ecotourism. Nevertheless, certain prereq-
uisites, such as knowledge dissemination, training, financial support, cultural promotion, eco-friendly infrastructure, and
a commitment to conservation, have been recognized as necessary for ensuring long-term community involvement in
ecotourism initiatives.
Keywords Biodiversity · Livelihoods · Sustainability · Stakeholders · Ecotourism · Chilika · DPSIR
1 Introduction
The concept of “ecotourism” was initially delineated as the act of traveling to areas that are relatively undisturbed or
uncontaminated, with a specific goal of exploration, appreciation, and enjoyment of the natural landscape, its flora and
fauna, and any associated cultural expressions present within these regions [1]. In essence, it entails the administration
of tourism activities and the preservation of natural resources in a manner that upholds a delicate equilibrium between
the demands of tourism and ecological considerations while also addressing the employment, skill development, income
generation, and empowerment of local communities. Furthermore, ecotourism serves as a conservation tool aimed at
reducing biodiversity decline and enhancing the quality of life within forest, marine, desert, and wetland habitats [2, 3].
* Rajashree Samal, [email protected]; Madhusmita Dash, [email protected] | 1School of Humanities, Social Sciences
and Management, Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar, Argul, Odisha 752050, India.
Discover Sustainability (2024) 5:50 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00233-2
Vol.:(0123456789)
Case Study Discover Sustainability (2024) 5:50 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00233-2
The wetland is known as the “kidney of the earth” because of the vital role it plays as a biodiverse and widespread
transition zone between land and water. The aforementioned phenomenon holds significant implications for individual
and societal progress, including aspects of human existence, development, and socio-economic advancement [4]. The
research topic of wetland ecotourism is relatively recent, although comprehensive research in this area remains incom-
plete [5]. Currently, the development of wetland ecotourism in India is in its initial stages, and there exist research-related
challenges. Wetlands offer a range of ecological services, including water purification, flood control, and climate regula-
tion, which play a significant role in enhancing the long-term viability and adaptability of the tourist sector [6]. Hence,
the preservation and effective governance of wetlands are crucial for ensuring the enduring feasibility of sustainable
tourism. The integration of ecotourism into the context of sustainable tourism is crucial in wetland habitats due to several
noteworthy factors. Ecotourism has the potential to make significant contributions to the conservation and protection
of wetland habitats. This is achieved through the dual mechanisms of raising knowledge about the ecological signifi-
cance of these ecosystems and generating financial resources for their effective management [3]. Additionally, it has the
potential to encourage sustainable practices and foster responsible tourism behavior, thus mitigating the adverse effects
on wetland ecosystems [7]. Moreover, the practice of ecotourism has the potential to generate economic advantages for
indigenous groups, thereby fostering their active participation in wetland preservation [5]. In addition, the practice of
ecotourism has the potential to contribute to the advancement of scientific research and monitoring efforts focused on
wetland ecosystems. This can result in a greater understanding of the ecological processes within these ecosystems as
well as the formulation of more efficient conservation plans [8]. Nevertheless, the augmented influx of visitors and the
engagement in recreational pursuits linked to ecotourism can potentially result in adverse consequences for wetland
ecosystems. The potential consequences encompassed by these impacts comprise habitat loss, disturbance to wildlife,
pollution stemming from tourism infrastructure, and heightened strain on water resources [9, 10]. Hence, the implemen-
tation of efficient management techniques and regulations is of utmost importance to mitigate the adverse effects of
ecotourism on wetlands and guarantee their enduring sustainability.
The Chilika Wetland, located in Odisha, is the largest coastal lagoon on the east coast of India. It holds the renowned
designation of being a ‘Ramsar Site of International Importance’ Development [11]. This wetland serves a crucial purpose
by offering substantial support to the local communities residing in its vicinity. Furthermore, it has a significant influ-
ence on their way of life, cultural practices, and ecosystems [12]. Chilika Lake has gained prominence in recent years
as a developing ecotourism site, attracting the interest of both local and international tourists who are seeking deep
encounters with the natural environment [13, 14]. The notion of ecotourism is in complete harmony with the conservation
principles upheld by Chilika since it seeks to offer visitors genuine opportunities to engage with the natural surroundings
while simultaneously playing a role in safeguarding its fragile ecosystems. The ecotourism industry in Chilika provides
tourists with the chance to discover the captivating scenery of the lagoon, witness its diverse range of flora and fauna,
and foster the principles of sustainable tourism. Ecotourism in Chilika offers a range of activities, such as boat rides on
calm lakes and birdwatching expeditions. These experiences contribute to a profound understanding and admiration
for the ecological wonders of the area. Ecotourism, as it pertains to the concept of sustainable development, continually
strives to achieve social and economic progress while minimizing the depletion of limited natural resources [3]. Given the
intrinsic characteristics and unique features of ecotourism, it is crucial to employ a proactive and strategic approach in the
development and promotion of ecotourism initiatives. The active participation and cooperation of several stakeholders,
such as local people, entrepreneurs, and community leaders, is vital in this context [15]. Hence, the primary aim of this
study is to comprehensively examine the socio-cultural, economic, and environmental ramifications of ecotourism, as
well as the extent of collaboration among stakeholders, within the context of Chilika Lake in Odisha. In this context, this
article explores the potential of ecotourism in Chilika Lake and presents recommendations for its future development.
Many previous studies [10, 12, 15–20] have conducted research on ecotourism in Chilika wetland. The majority of
the work was focused on Mangalajodi. It is located in the northern region of Lake Chilika and has mostly been the focal
point for the development of ecotourism. Tourism and cultural tourism have been developed in other notable locations
of the wetland, such as Barkul, Balugaon, and Satapada. The current analysis has focused on these locations, along with
Mangalajodi in Chilika. Further, the present study also used a similar methodology that was used by [15–17], but in the
context of Mangalajodi only. A thorough analysis has been conducted, taking into account three frameworks: DPSIR, TBL,
and Co-C approach. These frameworks together have not been utilized before in any study. Moreover, the study has used
mixed methods (both primary and secondary sources) to comprehend the wetland’s fundamental social, economic, and
environmental aspects. The policy implications of the analysis are to enhance community engagement in ecotourism
activities (community-based ecotourism). Stringent laws and certification systems may be established for ecotourism
businesses to guarantee compliance with sustainable practices. This includes instructions for the proper handling of
Vol:.(1234567890)
Discover Sustainability (2024) 5:50 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00233-2 Case Study
waste, minimizing human-wildlife interactions, and implementing restrictions on the number of visitors to avoid any
harm to the environment. It is important to include climate change adaptation techniques in the planning and admin-
istration of ecotourism. This may include implementing strategies such as rehabilitating the coastline and constructing
resilient infrastructure to counteract the effects of severe weather phenomena such as cyclones or rising sea levels.
The manuscript has been partitioned into five distinct sections, facilitating a comprehensive examination of various
aspects. The initial portion provided an overview of the ideas and contextual information relevant to the topic under
examination. The subsequent part provides an overview of the research methodology and study structure. The third part
of the paper provides a comprehensive overview of several frameworks for ecotourism. Meanwhile, the fourth section
delves into an analysis of the key elements and components of the study. The subsequent part will include a compre-
hensive summary of the results, recommendations, and possible directions for further study.
1.1 Status of tourists and wildlife census in Odisha and Chilika
Figure 1 and Table 2 depict that the number of tourist visits increased until 2019 but then began to decline due to the
effects of COVID-19. In 2020, tourist visits declined by 69.96% compared to 2019 [21–26]. Tourism and local livelihoods
were severely impacted. The tourist visit trend can be seen in the cases of Barkul, Satapada, and Rambha (Fig. 2). Barkul
receives the most visitors among these significant locations, followed by Satapada and Rambha. The trend of tourist visits
peaked in these three notable locations in 2019 and began to decline in 2020 owing to the impact of COVID-19 (Fig. 2).
Under the supervision of the Odisha State Wildlife Organisation, a census of birds and dolphins was conducted over
the last 5 years, from 2017–18 to 2021–22 (Fig. 3). It indicates that the number of birds and dolphins peaked in 2020–21
and then declined in 2021–22. However, the numbers have increased in comparison to the years preceding 2020. This
demonstrates that minimizing human interaction and interference benefits biodiversity and wildlife numbers (Table 1).
1.2 Study area
Chilika is well recognized as one of the largest coastal lagoons globally, noted for its abundant species and picturesque
landscapes. The study region chosen for this research is Lake Chilika, located at coordinates 19° 28′–19° 54′ N and
85° 05′–85° 38′ E. This selection is based on the lake’s notable position within the wetland biodiversity map of India and
its importance within the state of Odisha. It is recognized as the biggest coastal lagoon situated on the eastern coast
of India. It serves as a vital resource for the state of Odisha and has been officially declared a Wetland of International
Importance under the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands since 1981. The lagoon habitats are characterized by a combi-
nation of freshwater and seawater, creating a productive environment that supports diverse fish species [27]. The total
area of Chilika Lake is 1165 square kilometres, and it is situated within the administrative districts of Puri, Khurda, and
Ganjam in the state of Odisha, located along the eastern coastline of India (Fig. 3). The lagoon is surrounded by around
15422765
15319358
15307637
15208540
14111243
14011229
12919260
12842899
No. of Tourist
4632479
3742221
3744490
4,62,273
115128
110818
100014
76,361
10,206
2,269
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Year
Domestic Foreign Total
Fig. 1 Tourists visit—domestic, foreign and total (Odisha) (Source: Statistical Bulletin, Department of Tourism, Odisha (2017–2022))
Vol.:(0123456789)
Fig. 2 Tourists visit—domes- Domestic Tourists Visit Foreign Tourist Visit

tic, foreign and total (Chilika)
(Source: Author’s Construction Chilika (Rambha) Chilika (Rambha)
from the Statistical Bulletin, Chilika (Barkul) Chilika (Barkul)
Chilika (Satapada) Chilika (Satapada)
Department of Tourism, Odi-
sha (2017–2022)) 500000 2500
No. of Tourists
No. of Tourists
400000 2000
300000 1500
200000 1000
100000 500
0 0
2 0 1 52 0 1 62 0 1 72 0 1 82 0 1 92 0 2 02 0 2 1 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Year Year
Total Tourist Visit
Chilika (Rambha)
Chilika (Barkul)
Chilika (Satapada)
500000
No. of Tourists
400000
300000
200000
100000
0
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Year
Fig. 3 Wildlife census (birds 14 200 188

and dolphins) (Source: Wildlife 12.04 167
180 163
No. of Irrawaddy Dolphins & Bottlenose
Odisha (2022) (https://wildlife. 12 10.71 10.74

No. of Migratory Birds (in Lakhs)
10.21 160
odisha.gov.in/Publication)) 9.24 134
10 8.68 140 126
120 113
8
100
Dolphins
6
80
4 60
40
2
20
0 0
Year Year
Table 1 Growth rate of Year Total Growth (in %)

tourists visit in Odisha.
Source: Statistical Bulletin, 2016 1,29,19,260 –
Department of Tourism,
2017 1,41,11,243 9.23
Odisha (2017–2022)
2018 1,53,19,358 8.56
2019 1,54,22,765 0.68
2020 46,32,479 − 69.96
2021 37,44,490 − 19.17
Vol:.(1234567890)
337 communities, of which 150 are specifically designated as fishing villages. The estimated population of fishers in
the designated territory is around 400,000, with an approximate distribution of 40,000 households inhabited by fisher
individuals.
The lake was surveyed by the Zoological Survey of India (ZSI) from 1985 to 1988. The survey resulted in the identifi-
cation of a total of 800 fauna species, encompassing a variety of rare, endangered, threatened, and vulnerable species.
A total of twenty-four species of mammals, thirty-seven species of reptiles and amphibians have been documented. A
total of 726 species of flowering plants, distributed among 496 genera and 120 families, account for almost 25% of the
vascular plant species in the state of Odisha. Chilika Lake holds the distinction of being the most expensive wintering
habitat for migratory avifauna in the Indian subcontinent. It possesses significant avian biodiversity, particularly for
waterfowl species, and showcases a traditional village culture that emphasizes self-sufficiency and little reliance on
external resources. These characteristics make it a suitable candidate for ecotourism, as it contributes to conservation
efforts and enhances the well-being of local communities [20]. This particular location has a high level of biodiversity
within the country. Certain species that are included in the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red
List, denoting their status as threatened, are known to occupy the lake during certain stages of their life cycle. Migratory
birds have a wide range of origins, including distant locations such as the Caspian Sea, Baikal Lake, and remote regions
of Russia, Mongolia, Siberia, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Himalayas.
Lake Chilika has been identified as a potential UNESCO World Heritage site based on its adherence to Criterion (IX),
which recognizes its distinctive ecological system and the consequential ecological and biological processes that sustain
vital communities of flora and fauna. Additionally, Criterion (X) acknowledges Lake Chilika as an exceptional illustration
of a significant evolutionary process in the development of marine, brackish, and freshwater ecosystems. Ecotourism
activities mostly occur in specific sections of Chilika, namely Rambha Bay, Somolo and Dumkudi islands, Birds’ Island,
Parikud, Barkul, Mangalajodi, Satapada and the Mouth of the Lake Mangalajodi. Chilika holds significant scientific value
owing to its concentrated biodiversity, bio-geographical positioning, and geological attributes, rendering it a focal point
for scientific endeavors, particularly in the realm of biodiversity research (Fig. 4).
2 Methodology
The thematic content analysis approach is found to be suitable for the exploratory case study during its first stage. Case
studies are the preferred research technique in situations where the investigator has limited control over occurrences
and where the primary focus is on contemporary phenomena situated inside a real-life environment [28]. A case study is
produced to enhance comprehension of the coherence and entirety of a certain example [29]. The collection of primary
data was conducted using the methods of observation and discussions with key informants. The data were collected from
August to October 2023 and were meticulously structured to ensure comprehensive and reliable information acquisi-
tion. Firstly, an extensive examination of relevant literature and previous research related to the topic was undertaken to
provide a strong basis for the survey design. Subsequently, a comprehensive survey was developed, mostly consisting
of open-ended questions, to include a wide range of topics on ecotourism. These topics include environmental effects,
socio-cultural factors, economic consequences, stakeholder involvement, and sustainable methods. Subsequently, a
purposive sample method was used to choose key informants who had the necessary skills and experience related to
the objectives of the study. The primary participants in this research consist of many stakeholders from Ecotour Odisha,
Chilika Development Authority (CDA), Wildlife Odisha, souvenir shop proprietors, ecotour guides, and members of the
local community like boatmen and merchants. Appendix contains a concise overview of the participants’ socio-demo-
graphic information (Table 6).
Regarding the criteria used to determine the optimal sample size, a total of 42 stakeholders were interviewed for
the research. The importance of sample size is justified when a study of lived experience can adequately discover
and comprehend the primary issues with the involvement of 10–20 key research participants [30]. In addition, [31]
suggests that conducting 12 interviews is sufficient when the study objective is to comprehend shared perspectives
and experiences in a homogenous population. According to [32], qualitative interview research needs a minimum
of 20 to 30 interviews to be considered for publication. The discussions were carried out with a high level of respect
and cultural sensitivity, enabling the informants to openly articulate their viewpoints, experiences, and concerns sur-
rounding ecotourism in the research area. During the data collection period, we made careful and persistent efforts
to ensure that the recording of responses was consistent, accurate, and transparent. Each interview session with
the informants lasted for almost one hour. Field notes and audio recordings were used as additional instruments to
Vol.:(0123456789)
Fig. 4 Map of Lake Chilika (Source: https://www.chilika.com/how-to-reach.php)
capture contextual elements and enhance the obtained data. In addition, the data-gathering procedure scrupulously
followed ethical principles, including obtaining informed permission, ensuring confidentiality, and maintaining the
identity of informants.
The secondary data sources utilized in this research work were peer-reviewed studies, Ph.D. theses, and newspaper
articles. Additionally, sources such as yearly reports, popular articles, newsletters, and bulletins were also consulted
(Table 5 in Appendix). The process involved the identification and extraction of 39 peer-reviewed journal articles from
the SCOPUS and Google Scholar databases. This was achieved by utilizing keyword combinations such as ‘Ecotourism’
AND ‘Chilika’. The compilation of secondary literature was conducted by employing identical search phrases in the Google
search engine (Table 7 in Appendix).
To establish a sustainable framework for collaboration in the field of ecotourism and effectively accomplish the
research objectives, the present study incorporates the DPSIR framework, the Co-C (community-oriented collaborative)
approach to ecotourism, and the notion of Triple Bottom Line. Triple bottom Line (TBL) is a concept that duly considers
environmental, social and economic aspects in decision-making [33, 34] (Fig. 5). According to [34–37], the tourism sector
gains tremendous advantages such as improved efficiency and cost savings, improved market positioning, better stake-
holder relationships, improved strategic decision-making, and wider destination benefits and competitiveness through
adopting the principles of Triple Bottom Line. The DPSIR framework is used to understand the relationship between the
conservation of biodiversity and local livelihood implications in Chilika and to identify and analyse important ecotourism
factors of Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response [38]. Further integrating the concept of “Co-C Ecotourism Planning” will
explore the issues more efficiently rather than providing an ultimate solution. Given the interdependence of ecotourism
with many sectors and stakeholders, it becomes imperative to engage in collaborative efforts with these entities, with
a specific focus on garnering support and fostering mutual benefits [39]. Hence, the active engagement and dedica-
tion exhibited by all relevant stakeholders towards collaborative efforts will successfully address the local concerns and
obstacles faced by destinations while also offering a roadmap for the implementation of sustainable ecotourism practices.
Vol:.(1234567890)
Fig. 5 Conceptual model to guide the study analysis (Source: Authors’ construction derived from Swangjang and Kornpiphat [38], Wondirad
et al. [37] and Chan and Bhatta [39])
3 Assessment of the DPSIR framework
To achieve equilibrium, it is necessary to implement policies aimed at enhancing and reinstating natural resources and
ecosystems. This entails fostering a shift in the attitudes and behaviors of both visitors and stakeholders. Hence, to formu-
late suitable laws and control mechanisms, it is imperative to take into account the first phase, namely the driving factors
(D) that transform during the lifetime of ecotourism. The prioritization of ecological consciousness among ecotourists
facilitates an extensive understanding of the intrinsic significance of Chilika’s biodiversity. To effectively mitigate the
pressures (P) associated with a given issue, it is crucial to emphasize the importance of multi-stakeholder collaboration,
effective communication across institutions, active community engagement, and the implementation of appropriate
laws and regulations. The state (S) requires an examination of a database about the carrying capacity of ecotourism
and any associated alterations in the physical or biological equilibrium of the environment. Furthermore, the effective
management of D, P, and S necessitates a proactive approach to managing changes that arise as a result of I (Impact).
The interconnections between the various indicators derived from the DPSI phases play a crucial role in informing the
development of response (R) recommendations [38]. Therefore, as identified from field observations and key informant
discussions, the DPSIR factors of ecotourism on the environment of Chilika Lake are briefly represented in Table 2.
3.1 Drivers
The ecotourism driving forces that affect the Chilika Lake include ecotourism activities (e.g., boating, bird watching),
stakeholders’ relationships and dependency on natural resources. In the 2000s, the Chilika Development Authority
(CDA) started tourism in Chilika as an alternative employment option because of dwindling incomes from fishing, and
more villages began asking for support for tourism. The tourism plan drafted by the CDA along with the Integrated
Coastal Zone Management Project (ICZMP) supported tourism expansion through infrastructure development, such
as building food courts, sit-outs, toilets, parking areas and pathways. Jetties were built in 7 villages for tourism [40].
However, the project focuses entirely on infrastructure development without dealing with existing climate crisis
issues, threatened livelihoods, ecological damage and conflicts [41]. Like with prawn culture, tourism was also quickly
captured by the elite within the community. For each of the jetties that were built, a boat association was established
that manages the operation of the tourist boats [12, 33]. Association membership is only available to people from
Vol.:(0123456789)
Case Study
Vol:.(1234567890)
Table 2 Factors under DPSIR in the context of ecotourism in Chilika. Source: Author’s construction from observations and discussions; Fieldwork (2023)
Drivers Pressure State Impact Response
Ecotourism activities Overfishing to meet tourists’ Marginalisation in occupation Threat to wildlife ecosystem Afforestation to reduce soil erosion
Intra-community relations demand Reduced access to major tourism Decreasing revenue from tourism Waste management and sewage
Local–global community relations Poaching sites Chance of not being listed as a treatment
Corruption and political instability Lake pollution Social and economic instability UNESCO World heritage site Environmental education and aware-
Top-down approach Coastal erosion Unstable governance Vulnerable species and change in ness
Dependency on natural resources Natural disaster Interruption in bird breeding area species composition Eco-friendly infrastructure develop-
Underdeveloped infrastructure Siltationa, eutrophicationb, change Species extinction (e.g., Irrawaddy Inefficient stakeholders’ collabora- ment
in salinity of the lake dolphins) tion New employment opportunities
Conflict between institutions The underperformance of liveli- Establishing cohesion and mutual
Use of motorboats to meet tourist hood assets (human, natural, respect between the stakeholders
(2024) 5:50
demands social, physical, financial) Wildlife conservation and imposing a

Waste accumulation Less or no women’s participation ban on hunting and poaching
Negative perception of visitors Empowering local people through
capacity-building and training
programs
a
Siltation refers to the contamination of water due to the presence of fine particles of soil or sediment, mostly consisting of silt or clay [43]
b
Eutrophication is the condition when there is an overabundance of plant and algal development caused by an increase in the availability of one or more growth elements that are essen-
tial for photosynthesis, such as sunshine, carbon dioxide, and nutritional fertilizers [44]
| https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00233-2
that village and to those who own boats. Many of the communities don’t own boats. Even other occupations have
been restricted to people from the same village, which has further exacerbated intra-community tensions. Moreo-
ver, Dalit residents of Padampur village in Chilika pointed out that they had first lost their livelihood as agricultural
labour when the fields were converted to shrimp farms, and now they have no space in tourism either [33]. The
women, in particular, pointed out that all the tourism jobs (boat driving, shops etc.) are done by men, and women
find themselves with no income [12, 40].
There is also considerable ecological harm from tourism. Dolphin-watching guidelines are not enforced, and
there is no detailed sensitivity training provided to either the boat drivers or the tourists [10]. The boats have out-
board engines with rotor blades running through the water, which can injure dolphins. Additionally, the thousands
of boats running through the lake every day not only add fuel discharge to the water but also create a lot of noise
[42]. There is also a massive amount of waste generated by the tourism industry that is not adequately managed.
Some instances of shortcomings and problems can be presented for various tourist destinations in Chilika that have
been studied under the tourism plan drafted by CDA along with the ICZMP. E.g., (1) Rambha: the site is inadequately
maintained, and there are no proper activities in and around the sites to engage the tourists. Furthermore, lack of
land availability also creates hurdles for any developmental activities; (2) Barkul: limited land availability and lack
of coordination between government and private boat associations lead to complexities in the tariff structure; the
boats being operated are ill-maintained and provide a very uncomfortable ride to the tourists; (3) Satapada: lack of
coordination amongst boat association members, absence of basic tourist amenities, lack of safety measures, neg-
ligence of eco-sensitive measures by boatmen and poor maintenance and facilities.
3.2 Pressure
The ecological impact of tourism on Chilika is multifaceted. The adverse pressure on the lake ecosystem is due to
a range of factors, including the influx of visitors, the proliferation of tourism activities, and the escalation of con-
struction activities. Over the years, the lagoon has witnessed a significant increase in the number of tourists, both
at domestic and international levels. This rise in tourist footfall has put immense stress on the fragile ecosystem of
Chilika. Large numbers of tourists contribute to increased pollution through littering and waste disposal. Another
significant concern is the disturbance caused to the avian population that relies on Chilika as an important habitat.
Growing tourism activities, such as boat rides, loud noises, and increased human presence, have disrupted these
avian species’ natural behavior and breeding patterns [15]. Moreover, the tourism plan drafted by CDA and ICZMP,
considering the carrying capacity of the lake use rate (the spatial spread of lake where boating activity can take
place without incurring any adverse impacts on its surrounding sensitive zones), determined that Barkul, Rambha
and Satapada zones should maintain 112, 96 and 167 boats respectively. Based on the field observation, the lake
use rate in Barkul and Rambha is within the recommended limit, but it exceeds in case of Satapada. Further, the
accumulation of solid waste and pollutants poses a threat to aquatic life and affects the overall water quality of
the lagoon [45]. The release of untreated sewage from nearby households and fish markets adds to this condition
[10]. According to the tourism plan drafted by CDA along with the ICZMP report, total waste generated in various
significant tourist destinations was 49.64% higher in 2020 compared to the year 2015, and it is expected that in
future, i.e., in 2025, it will increase by 51.23%. Lake pollution and untreated sewage have a measurable impact on the
equilibrium of the physical, chemical, and biological aspects of the environment. Furthermore, the construction of
infrastructure and tourism-related facilities in and around Chilika has resulted in habitat loss and encroachment on
sensitive areas [18]. The economic pressure of tourism on Chilika is also significant. While tourism contributes to the
local economy by generating employment and income opportunities, it often leads to unsustainable exploitation
of resources. Overfishing, depletion of natural resources, and disruption of traditional fishing practices are some of
the adverse effects of unchecked tourism activities [8]. At Chilika, the fishermen have identified several fish species
that have disappeared from the lake and noted the changes in the numbers of Irrawaddy dolphins [27]. This not only
jeopardizes the livelihoods of local communities but also undermines the long-term economic viability of the region.
Therefore, currently, the local stakeholders are actively exploring alternate means to harness natural resources and
leverage the environment [16].
Vol.:(0123456789)
3.3 State: understanding the carrying capacity
Due to tourism congestion and tourist activity pressure, carrying capacity (a certain limit on visitor use) needs to
be checked to manage the current ecological state of Chilika [46]. Carrying capacity can also be a guiding factor for
planning accessibility, infrastructure development, locations of use, number of vehicles, number of boats, number of
people visiting etc. It also depends on factors like the length of stay (number of nights) of the visitors, visitors’ local
expenditure patterns, and the effects on local populations, culture and nature [47].
In this study, the calculation of carrying capacity is considered from the tourism plan drafted by CDA along with
the ICZMP, which inferred that all three boating zones, namely Rambha, Barkul and Satapada cluster, are nearing
their total carrying capacity. Especially Barkul and Satapada are almost saturated, considering the holding capacity
of the lake in terms of boats. Therefore, these zones shall not be further loaded with additional boating activity and
hence have been demarcated as Limited Development Zone within the lake. Furthermore, the report has calculated
the maximum number of boats that Chilika Lake can contain at a given time without inducing any adverse environ-
mental impacts. A 4F approach has been adopted for carrying capacity-based recommendations for boating, i.e.,
Flags (on water), Floating (boats), Forum (for Chilika) and Federation (for boat associations). The concept of “float-
ing boats” is proposed for the Satapada Cluster. This concept would involve reserving 25% of the total permissible
number of boats from each site to be stored as “floating boats.” An online web portal for boating in Chilika Lake with
centralized ticketing and a real-time boat tracking system is proposed to restrict unaccounted and uncontrolled boat
movements in the lake area. This will also help to reduce the commission charged by the middlemen and eventually
benefit the boatmen and tourists.
At Mangalajodi, the three boating stations currently operational are under the Mahavir Pakshi Suraksha Samiti
(MPSS), Eco-Tourism Trust and Mangalajodi Conservation Tourism Trust (MCTT), handling a total of 14 licensed boats.
If a comparison is made with the value of the lake use rate, the number of licensed boats is within the prescribed limit
(15 boats). However, the actual number of boats being operated exceeds the lake use rate according to the tourism
plan drafted by CDA and ICZMP. The recommendations framed by CDA for Mangalajodi shall aim at maintaining the
following, i.e., boating activity [number of boats to be regulated based on lake use rate (15 boats)] and vehicular
accessibility [provisions for regulating and organizing vehicular traffic (based on existing peak traffic load)].
Further, the importance of carrying capacity in ecotourism sites lies in regulating tourist numbers and visitors’
participation in sustainable behaviors through environmental awareness programs. According to the field observa-
tion, to accomplish this, the Chilika Development Authority and local ecotourism members undertook a variety of
instructional. A visitor interpretation center is accessible in Mangalajodi, offering visitors comprehensive knowledge
about the area’s value, its diverse range of species, and the crucial role of conservation efforts. Visitors are educated
about the ecology, animals, and significance of responsible conduct through educational signage such as ‘Plastic
free Chilika is our motto’ and informational boards about migrating birds and tourist sites. Visitors are provided with
guided tours and educational activities, as well as internet materials including websites, videos, and photographs,
to enhance their knowledge before they reach the location. These resources can highlight conservation initiatives,
exhibit regional biodiversity, and provide guidance for conscientious ecotourism.
3.4 Impact: an example of Mangalajodi ecotourism, Chilika
To manage the impact of tourism congestion, multi-stakeholder participation, PPP (public–private partnership) and
community participation are the ultimate needs [48] (Table 3). For this, the Co-C (community-based co-management)
ecotourism planning approach has been referred to, which emphasizes collaboration and partnership between
local communities and other stakeholders [39] (Fig. 6). In this case, Mangalajodi is represented as one of the classic
examples of balancing livelihoods and conservation.
The region of Mangalajodi has been officially recognized as an “Important Bird Area” (IBA) by Birdlife International
due to its substantial ecological value as a habitat for waterfowl species on a worldwide scale. Within this rural com-
munity, the inhabitants have discovered that engaging in poaching serves as an additional means of generating
income for their livelihoods, alongside the more conventional farming and fishing techniques. Nevertheless, it is
crucial to acknowledge that these acts are deemed unethical. Over time, Mangalajodi has acquired a distinct notoriety
as the “poacher’s village” [16]. The occurrence led to a substantial decrease in both the population and biodiversity of
Vol:.(1234567890)
Table 3 Stakeholders and their involvement in Mangalajodi ecotourism, Chilika. Source: Author’s own elaboration by referring to Kummitha
[17] and field observation (2023)
Stakeholders Involvement in Mangalajodi ecotourism organisation
Sree Sree Mahavir Pakshi Suraksha Samiti and Mangalajodi ecotourism trust • Created by ex-poachers for livelihood improvement
(MET) • Related to capacity building
• Motivate to involve other stakeholders
• Common objective of village development
IGS (Indian Grameen Services) • Enhancing the overall development of the destination
• Enhancement of capacity-building activities
• Encouraging the engagement of additional stakeholders
• Associated with the effective management of funds
RBS foundation (Royal Bank of Scotland) • The promotion of ecotourism on a broader scale
• Formulation and administration of policies and financial
resources of Mangalajodi Ecotourism Trust (MET)
CDA (Chilika Development Authority) • Pertaining to the overall development of the project
• Engagement across several tiers of the project
• Recommendations to enhance the destination
Forest Department, Government of Odisha • Overall upgrade of the ecotourism project site
• Participation across many developmental programs
• Recommendations for enhancing the destination
Community-based ecotourism (Mangalajodi ecotourism trust)/other ecotour- • Associated with the overall development of the area
ism institutions) • Creating connections between various institutions
• Shared goal of village development
District-level government departments (revenue, water, fisheries and wildlife • Implementing community development initiatives
department, boat association) • Providing financial and administrative support
• Making suggestions towards improving the destination
bird species. To tackle the issue, the Chilika Development Authority (CDA) formed a partnership with the local forest
department and sought support from the Wild Odisha NGO, a regional non-governmental organization committed
to the preservation of wildlife. In the initial stage, a group of young people hailing from Mangalajodi established a
citizen forum known as the “Maa Kalijai Jubak Sangh” to thwart illegal hunting activities and foster the preservation
of the natural environment. Wild Odisha volunteers played a facilitating role in the formation of a bird conserva-
tion organization, referred to as the “Sree Sree Mahavir Pakshi Suraksha Committee.” This committee facilitated the
collaboration of individuals with previous involvement in poaching activities and young members of the local com-
munity. Their joint endeavors were focused on the preservation of avian species [15].
The collaboration between the CDA, the local forest department, and Wild Orissa continued in Mangalajodi until 2002,
as part of their ongoing commitment to conservation endeavors. To address the problem of poaching, the government
devised a method whereby individuals active in conservation efforts as well as those engaged in poaching activities
were given a monthly stipend. Initially set at 500 INR, the stipend was subsequently increased to 1000 INR to incentivize
these individuals. However, these attempts have shown partial success, although they lacked consistency and failed to
completely eradicate poaching operations (Field Observation, 2023). The advent of tourism in Mangaljodi from 2002 to
2003 brought about a notable shift in the collective mindset of the village. A group of around 25 young individuals from
Mangaljodi, together with participants from neighbouring villages, underwent guide training facilitated by the CDA in
collaboration with Wild Odisha. Wild Odisha, in collaboration with the Council of Professional Social Workers (CPSW) and
with the backing of the RBS (Royal Bank of Scotland) Foundation India, initiated an ecotourism initiative centered around
guided bird viewing [10, 16]. This endeavor aims to cater to the interests of bird enthusiasts and nature lovers, with the
assistance of local guides. The ecotourism operations and influx of tourists to Mangalajodi were of limited importance
before 2008. In 2009, the RBS (Royal Bank of Scotland) foundation resumed the role of a financial and intellectual col-
laborator, while IGS (Indian Grameen Services), an NGO for livelihood improvement, served as the implementing partner
for knowledge acquisition, skill dissemination, and community advancement [16, 17].
Based on the field observation, the formation of the Mangalajodi Ecotourism Trust (MET) has enabled the indigenous
population and local boatmen to receive training in guiding, hospitality, and food services. The group actively engaged in
providing boating services to visitors, and a comprehensive campaign was implemented to enhance awareness among
the local population [17]. The Mangalajodi Ecotourism Trust (MET) constructed a homestay-type facility intended to
Vol.:(0123456789)
Fig. 6 Community-based co-management framework of ecotourism (Source: Modified from Chan and Bhatta [39])
provide an accommodation option for travelers. Various equipment, such as binoculars, have been offered to enhance
the sightseeing experience. Following the established guidelines, individuals have the opportunity to engage in the
activity of bird watching while maintaining a minimum distance of 30 feet from the avian species. This was accomplished
by utilizing non-motorized boats, therefore minimizing potential disruptions to the birds’ natural habitat.
The establishment of strong relationships with tour operators and educational institutions played a significant role in
drawing various types of visitors, including tourists, wildlife photographers, travel journalists, and academicians, to the
region. The aforementioned features, including the existing connectivity, convenient accessibility to the location, and
other relevant considerations, contribute to the successful establishment of Mangalajodi as a prominent ecotourism
destination within the region of Odisha.
3.5 Response: nature camps of Chilika
Nature camps serve as a dynamic example of the efficacy of ecotourism in both preserving biodiversity and enhancing
the economic well-being of local communities. The Forest, Environment and Climate Change Department serves as the
primary agency responsible for the advancement of ecotourism within Odisha. In 2016, the department implemented
the strategy of community-based ecotourism in Odisha with the aim of garnering support from forest-dependent people
for the conservation of forests and wildlife. The government has authorized a 5-year plan (2016–17 to 2020–21) for the
Vol:.(1234567890)
7000000 2500
6000000 2000
5000000
Visitors
Revenue
4000000 1500
3000000 1000
2000000
500
1000000
0 0
Year Year
Berhampura Nature Camp Berhampura Nature Camp
Manglajodi Nature Camp Manglajodi Nature Camp
Rajhans Nature Camp Rajhans Nature Camp
Fig. 7 Financial year-wise revenue and footfall of Chilika nature camps (Source: Wildlife Odisha report, 2022 (https://wildlife.odisha.gov.in/
Publication))
promotion of ecotourism, with a financial allocation of Rs. 56 crore [49]. The Institute of Hotel Management (IHM) and
Odisha Biodiversity Board (OBB) in Bhubaneswar have been conducting training sessions for the members of the Eco-
development Committee (EDC), Vana Suraksha Samiti (VSS) and Ecotourism Groups (ETG). The primary objective of these
programs is to offer training and guidance, enhance skills, and facilitate exposure visits that pertain to different facets
of the hospitality industry. These include areas such as housekeeping, sanitation, cleaning, communication skills, food
cuisine and eco-guiding. The primary aim of these initiatives is to improve the administration of ecotourism nature camps
inside the state [50]. The nature camps provide visitors with the chance to engage in guided tours facilitated by a well-
informed specialist who possesses expertise in the indigenous plant and animal species present in the surrounding area.
In addition, visitors have the opportunity to engage in various activities such as cycling, participating in canopy walks,
observing birds, engaging in sports, boating, and accessing a souvenir shop. These activities serve to enrich the overall
experience of visitors and facilitate their complete appreciation of the remarkable natural wonders present in the lagoon.
In Fig. 7, it is observed that, despite the impact of COVID-19, the trend of revenue and tourist visits shows an upward
trend. The reason is due to the effective management of the pandemic impacts through the implementation of appropri-
ate protocols and strategic advertising. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, ecotourism destinations were closed between
May to August 2021. Later, ecotourism destination sites were opened, and community members were trained by the
Institute of Hotel Management (IHM) and the Indian Institute of Tourism and Travel Management (IITTM), Bhubane-
swar, to provide excellent service to tourists following Covid protocols. All Nature Camps utilized equipment such as
ULV (ultra-low volume) sprayers, sanitizer dispensers, IR (infrared) thermometers, etc., with certified cleansing agents. All
community members have been provided with protective supplies for their prevention and safety [49, 50]. In the case
of nature camps, it has been interpreted that Rajhans nature camp generates the maximum revenue (52.40%) of the
total revenue generated by all nature camps in Chilika, followed by Mangalajodi (33.78%) and Berhanmpura (13.81%).
Furthermore, Rajhans Nature Camp has the highest visitor contribution (50.87%) to the total number of visitors, followed
by Mangalajodi (35.05%) and Berhampura (14.06%) (Fig. 7).
According to the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) established between the forest and tourism departments,
the tourism department is actively engaged in the extensive promotion of Odisha ecotourism inside India as well as on
an international level [51]. In ecotourism sites, the use of plastics is prohibited, and there is a strong emphasis on main-
taining cleanliness and hygiene. Additionally, measures are implemented to effectively manage traffic pollution and
minimize sound pollution. Furthermore, the state government has established an ecotourism unit inside the Forest and
Environment Department of the state government. The tourist department, in collaboration with the Forest, Environ-
ment and Climate Change department, has developed the ‘Odisha Ecotourism Roadmap 2030’ as a strategic framework
to effectively use the eco-tourism opportunities presented by Chilika and the entire state [51, 52].
Vol.:(0123456789)
4 Conclusion
The DPSIR framework offers a valuable perspective for analyzing the dynamics of ecotourism in Chilika Lake, a
prominent wetland ecosystem located in India. The factors propelling the development of ecotourism in Chilika Lake
encompass a growing need for nature-oriented encounters and the economic prospects associated with tourism.
Nevertheless, this phenomenon also exerts significant stress on the delicate ecological system. The implementation
of infrastructure development, such as the establishment of visitor facilities and access points, as well as the pro-
motion of visitor activities like boating and birdwatching, can impose significant pressure on the ecosystems and
biodiversity of the lake. Assessing the state of Chilika Lake involves evaluating the health of the ecosystem, includ-
ing water quality, the abundance of native species, and overall ecological integrity. The impacts of ecotourism can
be both ecological, such as habitat disturbance and the introduction of invasive species, as well as socio-economic,
with potential overcrowding and imbalanced distribution of benefits. To respond to these challenges, conservation
measures must be implemented, including habitat restoration and water quality management. Sustainable tourism
practices should be promoted through guidelines for operators and visitors, aiming to minimize ecological impacts
and maximize socio-economic benefits. Engaging stakeholders, including local communities and government agen-
cies, is essential for inclusive decision-making and the long-term sustainability of ecotourism in Chilika Lake.
Using the DPSIR framework, the study concentrated on the negative impact of poor ecotourism management,
followed by an assessment of various pressures caused by driving factors in some of the most popular tourist loca-
tions. Analysis by CDA and ICZMP on carrying capacity has been done as an efficient strategy in the case of the lake
use rate of boats in Chilika and bird-watching tourists in Mangalajodi as examples to revive the adverse state of the
destinations owing to over-tourism. Furthermore, in Mangalajodi, the collaborative stakeholder structure (Co-C
approach) in minimizing the negative impact of drivers symbolizes socio-cultural-economic-environmental balance
(Triple Bottom Line). As a result, the efficiency in generating revenue, providing employment and wildlife conserva-
tion through nature camps in Chilika gives a classic example of proper ecotourism management while simultaneously
providing tourist satisfaction.
Moreover, the assessment of different tourist places done by [53] in collaboration with ICZMP and CDA explains the
strength of the site. E.g., Rambha, a prominent tourist destination in Chilika, is famous for its rich cultural history, strong
community support and road and railway connectivity. It is also well connected to other tourist destinations; Barkul,
which hosts a large number of tourists is a prominent gateway to the lake. Its strength lies in strong community adherence
and good connectivity through railway and bus stations. Proximity to a variety of attraction points, such as Kalijai temple,
Nalabana Bird Sanctuary and Chadheibar, makes way for a strong tourist presence here. The opportunity lies in commu-
nity adherence can be used effectively to support community-based activities and provide employment opportunities
for the locals; Satapada has good connectivity through roads and railways. It is the access point for dolphin watching and
visiting surrounding islands and accessibility to many islands and tourist hotspots like Rajhans Island, Red Crab Island
and Sea Mouth in the vicinity. Therefore, the strengths and opportunities lie in the music, dance, art and bird festival.
Chilika’s unique local cuisine can be developed properly, given the presence of interested private groups and NGOs.
In a similar line, the success of nature camps cannot be ignored. According to one key informant from Ecotour Odisha,
“The introduction of ecotourism has employed local people through ecotourism activities. Furthermore, even during the
peak period of COVID-19, the revenue earned by the introduction of nature camps shows a rising trend. The COVID-19
protocol was successfully implemented owing to the involvement of the government and the local community.”
Another staff from the same office narrated the success of nature camps and Mangalajodi ecotourism as it bagged
the UNWTO award in 2014 [54]. According to her,
“The government will assign more site managers to better manage the nature camps. During the off-season, site
managers will get a 10% income share from the government as an incentive to safeguard and market the site. In
addition, the ‘Odisha Ecotourism Society’ has been formed to manage ecotourism in various protected areas and to
implement relevant policies through its nominated members.”
Vol:.(1234567890)
A knowledgeable individual affiliated with the CDA provided his insights on the fact that “Considering Chilika’s
diverse nature and ecological characteristics, the future of ecotourism is very bright. For example, Mangalajodi created
community-based ecotourism with local backing. The former poachers are now eco guides and conservationists”. Further-
more, he emphasized the relevance of dolphin, adventure, and cultural tourism, which can supplement ecotourism
for the lake’s sustainability.
But, despite the success of Mangalajodi ecotourism, many issues persist in terms of numbers in employment
generation, power politics, less participation of women community etc. The viewpoint of another person of higher
authority related to CDA emphasised the fact that,
“Ecotourism plays an important role in empowering the local community. But it can also destroy biodiversity if not
managed properly. Therefore, all stakeholders should work in unison to make this successful. Moreover, the fisher
community are the most important stakeholder in Chilika. That is why the success of ecotourism majorly depends
on their support and participation”.
Odisha is one of the three coastal states under the federal government’s ambitious Integrated Coastal Zone Manage-
ment Project. One of the main objectives of this project is ecotourism development in Odisha. The Chilika Development
Authority (CDA), established in 1991 for the overall development of the Chilika Lagoon, is the implementing agency
for this project. The state government drafted a report on its vision and implementation plan for ICZM, in which they
recognise the importance of prioritising local communities and ecosystems in their plans [53]. The plan repeatedly
emphasises the involvement of the local community in the development of ecotourism-related infrastructure (e.g.,
sit-outs, handicrafts and handloom centres, and boats), which is to be later handed over to the local communities for
operation and maintenance. However, members of the boat association indicated that infrastructure such as tourist
camps are outsourced to private players, which takes capital out of Chilika, while other types of infrastructure, including
those mentioned in the plan, have not been developed properly [40, 53, 55]. The plan includes many components of
sustainable cultural tourism and the description of ecotourism provided by the Odisha Tourism Development Corpora-
tion (OTDC). It identifies the role of culture, nature, sustainable and green infrastructure, education, adventure, and, most
importantly, the well-being of Indigenous people. However, the reality on the ground reflects a disconnect between these
laudable aims and the way ecotourism is being practised. Currently, the ecotourism sector also focuses on dolphins as
an attraction for tourists, which represents a missed opportunity for more meaningful involvement of local communi-
ties aligning tourism with conservation efforts. Achieving this holistic and ideal vision for ecotourism at Chilika requires
translating the plan into action [10].
According to [41], which focused on the conservation of coastal ecosystems by the Ministry of Tourism, it was observed
during the audit that despite the construction of five camp infrastructures along the Chilika coast in 2018, with a total
expenditure of 1.46 crore, these facilities were unable to become operational due to inadequate provision of water
supply and electricity. The Odisha Tourism Development Corporation (OTDC) undertook a project focused on the devel-
opment of participatory ecotourism in Chilika, to enhance livelihood security. Upon examination of the records, it was
discovered that the OTDC allocated a sum of 2.97 crores towards the establishment of many amenities such as food
courts, public conveniences, parking facilities, and a tourist information centre. These initiatives were undertaken in
collaboration with the Eco-tourism Development Society (EDS) to augment the tourism potential in the region. Despite
the transfer of these assets to EDS in May 2016, their operational status could not be achieved by EDS as of September
2021 due to the site’s inability to attract tourists [41]. To facilitate the development of sustainable livelihoods through
ecotourism along the Chilika coast, the Wildlife Division of Chilika procured a total of seven transit boats during the period
spanning from March to July 2014. Upon careful examination of the documents, it was revealed that the department
operated the seven transit boats for only 11 months. Nevertheless, the lack of ecological viability rendered these vessels
impractical for ecotourism purposes, primarily because of their substantial fuel consumption. The initiative was unable
to enhance the capacity building of the selected institutes due to a lack of enough personnel. The study also revealed
that the current monitoring and protection procedures in place for coastal resources are insufficient [41]. Hence, the
ICZM project did not achieve significant progress in enhancing the ability for sustainable coastal management in India’s
coastal zones.
Vol.:(0123456789)
5 Future actions for further research and recommendations
Given Chilika’s ecological sensitivity, measuring carrying capacity is essential. The carrying capacity of boats in the
case of Chilika and bird-watching visitors in the case of Mangalajodi has been determined in the report developed by
ICZMP and CDA [53]. However, how far it will be implemented has yet to be determined. Furthermore, the carrying
capacity of other popular tourist destinations, such as Rambha, Barkul, and Balugaon, has not yet been investigated.
As a result, greater knowledge in this area is required to develop Chilika’s overall ecosystem. The primary limitation
of calculating carrying capacity is that it can only be conducted during the peak tourist season. Therefore, a study on
the comparison of carrying capacity in both off-season and peak season will offer a proper notion of the economic
and environmental effect of ecotourism on Chilika Lake. Because most literature and key informants have stressed
the importance of community-based ecotourism and multi-stakeholder engagement, it is necessary to determine
which stakeholder is playing the essential role in managing ecotourism at Chilika. Also, given the political dynamics
and hierarchy at the authority level, whether the governance is good or bad must be considered. The major com-
munity is the fishing community. As a result, their perspectives are crucial in the introduction of ecotourism. Further,
according to observations and various articles, women’s engagement in the ecotourism industry at Chilika is very
low or non-existent. So, how much they are willing to engage, and if they are, how empowered they are because
of the ecotourism enterprise, has to be investigated. Further, the use of clean energy should be promoted to attain
sustainable development goals by mitigating carbon emissions in the ecotourism sector [56]. Ecotourism as a con-
servation technique seeks to maximize local community livelihood prospects [57]. According to the SLF (Sustainable
Livelihood Framework), the influence of tourism on the five livelihood capitals (human, social, physical, financial and
natural) must be quantified to comprehend the proximity of tourist impact on livelihood and environment. Also,
valuation is a much-needed phenomenon to understand the tourists’ perception of conserving Chilika Lagoon for
sustainable purposes [58].
To ensure the success of the ecotourism development project in Chilika Lake in terms of biodiversity conservation
and livelihood improvement, the present study advocates the subsequent measures:
• The promotion of native handicrafts, food, folk songs/music, and economic-generating activities within the com-
munity should be supported.
• The allocation of enough funding by both central and state governments is vital for the enhancement of road infra-
structure, transit systems, and the establishment of clean and hygienic environments, as well as the provision of safety
and security measures at tourism destinations. It is recommended that an annual allocation of funds be designated
specifically to develop ecotourism initiatives.
• It is recommended to expand the development of ecotourism infrastructure, including the establishment of additional
ecotourism facilities and eco-sheds. These structures should be constructed using environmentally friendly methods
such as the utilization of solar energy, adoption of waste recycling practices, promotion of natural cross ventilation
instead of relying on air-conditioning systems, and the achievement of a high level of self-sufficiency in food produc-
tion through the establishment of orchards, ecological farms, and aquaculture operations.
• Organizing ecotourism groups inside schools and colleges can serve as a means to foster awareness and understand-
ing of nature tourism among the younger generation.
• It is recommended that the establishment of an environmental education centre and interpretation centre should
be considered in all prominent tourist places of Chilika Lake.
6 Limitations of the study
The findings and conclusions of the case study are limited by a small sample size, which might affect the accuracy of the
results. Increasing the size and diversity of the sample might improve the study’s validity. The study is constrained by the
particular time period in which data was gathered. The dynamics of ecotourism and the roles of stakeholders may vary
Vol:.(1234567890)
over time, and the research may not accurately depict long-term changes or trends. Given the methodological restrictions,
the selected study methodologies and instruments have their limits. For example, relying only on interviews or surveys
may not comprehensively capture the intricacies of stakeholder relationships. Utilizing supplementary techniques to
triangulate data might improve the study’s reliability. The case study lacks a comprehensive analysis of the impact of
wider tourist developments on stakeholder responsibilities. The study’s scope is limited due to constraints in resources,
such as time, funds and access to certain stakeholders. These limitations may affect the thoroughness of the investiga-
tion and the capacity to include a diverse set of stakeholders.
Author contributions R.S.—conceived and designed the research paper; identified the research objective and methodology; primarily respon-
sible for overseeing interviews and surveys with stakeholders; data synthesis, interpreting the findings, and drawing conclusions; contributed
to the development of visual representations, such as charts and graphs, to present key findings. M.D.—collaborated with Author R.S. in
refining the research questions and methodology; organizing and structuring the paper, ensuring coherence and adherence to academic
standards; refined the paper’s conclusions and implications; contributed to the critical review of the paper, offering insights and suggestions
for improvement.
Data availability The data that support the findings of this study are not openly available due to reasons of sensitivity and are available from
the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Data can be found in the Odisha wildlife reports and statistical bulletins of the tourism
department, Odisha.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate Approval was obtained from the ethics committee of the Indian Institute of Technology Bhubane-
swar. The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all individual
participants included in the study.
Consent for publication The participant has consented to the submission of the case report to the journal.
Competing interests The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have
appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adapta-
tion, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source,
provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article
are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in
the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will
need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://c reati vecom
mons.o
rg/l icens es/b
y/4.0
/.
Appendix
See Tables 4, 5, 6, and 7.
Vol.:(0123456789)
Case Study
Vol:.(1234567890)
Table 4 List of the secondary data and sources. Source: Author’s own compilation of different sources (2023)
Serial number Source Year Type of source
1 Odisha tourism policy 2022 Report

2 Annual report (ecotourism) retrieved from Ecotour Odisha, Wildlife Odisha and Wildlife Organisation (Forest & Environment 2019–20 Report
Department)
3 Tourism master plan of the Chilika and its catchment, Odisha under ICZMP—Odisha received from Chilika Development Author- 2014–2017 Report [unpublished]
ity (CDA)
4 Birds & Dolphin census retrieved from Wildlife Odisha, Odisha Wildlife Organization (iWLMS) 2021–22 Report
5 Tourist visit—domestic, foreign and total retrieved from statistical bulletin, Department of Tourism, Odisha 2017–2022 Bulletins
(2024) 5:50
6 Stakeholders involvement at MET (Mangalajodi ecotourism trust) referred from Kummitha [17] 2020 Research article
7 Chilika newsletter series, volume I–VI, retrieved from Chilika Development Authority and Wetlands International—South Asia 2000–12 Newsletters
8 Doctoral dissertation by Prateep Kumar Nayak [12] 2012 Thesis
9 The Times of India, Business Standard, the Telegraph 2016, 2018, 2024 Newspaper articles
10 Odisha State Forest Headquarters, PCCF & HoFF Odisha, Bhubaneswar, Forest, Environment and Climate Change Department, 2024 Official website
Government of Odisha
| https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00233-2
Table 5 Number of Stakeholder No. of respond-

stakeholders interviewed. ents interviewed
Source: Fieldwork, 2023;
Author’s own construction Eco guide and boat members 15
(2023)
ETG workers from nature camps 2
Manager from nature camp 1
Managers from MET 2
Workers from MET 3
Key informants from CDA 3
Activist from MPSS 1
Key informants from Wildlife Odisha and Ecotour Odisha department 3
Tour operators and souvenir store owners at Chilika 4
Boat association members and manager 3
Local community members (local transportation and local shops) 5
Total 42
ETG Ecotourism group, MET Mangalajodi Ecotourism Trust, CDA Chilika Development Authority, MPSS
Mangalajodi Pakshi Suraksha Samiti
Table 6 Socio-demographic Variables N = 42(%)

characteristics of the
stakeholders. Source: Gender
Fieldwork, 2023; Author’s own
Male 80.95
construction (2023)
Female 16.66
Age (in years)
< 25 2.38
26–35 9.52
36–45 54.76
46–55 26.19
> 55 4.76
Education
≤ Primary education 59.52
Secondary school education 19.04
University bachelor’s degree 11.90
Master’s and Ph.D. education 7.14
Occupation
Local community member 11.90
Employees in private and non-governmental organisations 57.14
Employees in governmental organisations 21.42
Tourism providers (tour operators, local shops) 9.52
The variable types are referred from Pasape et al. [59]
Table 7 Databases and Data base Number of journal articles

numbers of journal articles
selected for the study. Source: Scopus 16 [Chilika (all fields) and Ecotourism (article title,
Author’s own construction abstract, keywords)]
(2023)
Google scholar 35 [Chilika and Ecotourism (in the entire manuscript)]
Duplicates removed 12
Manual analysis of total records 39
‘[ ]’ represents the keywords entered in the search tab of the database
Vol.:(0123456789)
References
1. Ceballos-Lascurain H. The future of ecotourism. Mexico J. 1988;17:13–4.
2. Das M, Chatterjee B. Ecotourism: a panacea or a predicament? Tour Manag Perspect. 2015;14:3–16.
3. Samal R, Dash M. Ecotourism, biodiversity conservation and livelihoods: understanding the convergence and divergence. Int J Geoherit
Parks. 2023;11(1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2022.11.001.
4. Xing H, Niu J, Feng Y, Hou D, Wang Y, Wang Z. A coastal wetlands mapping approach of the Yellow River Delta with a hierarchical clas-
sification and optimal feature selection framework. CATENA. 2023;223: 106897.
5. Luo Y. A probe into wetland ecotourism. In: 3rd international conference on science and social research (ICSSR). 2014. p. 1429–33.
6. Lamsal P, Kumar L, Atreya K, Pant K. Vulnerability and impacts of climate change on forest and freshwater wetland ecosystems in Nepal:
a review. Ambio. 2013;46(8):915–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0923-9.
7. Ramirez F, Santana J. Wetland ecotourism. In: Environmental education and ecotourism. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 51–6.
8. Nayak PK. The Chilika Lagoon social-ecological system: a historical analysis. Ecol Soc. 2014. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05978-190101.
9. Liquete C, Piroddi E, Drakou L, Gurney S, Katsanevakis A, Charefet A. Current status and future prospects for the assessment of marine
and coastal ecosystem services: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(7):67737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067737.
10. Acharyya T, Sudatta BP, Das DB, Srichandan S, Baliarsingh SK, Raulo S, Singh S, Samal RN, Mishra M, Bhat I. Irrawaddy dolphin in Asia’s
largest brackish water lagoon: a perspective from SWOT and sentiment analysis for sustainable ecotourism. Environ Dev. 2023;46: 100863.
11. Chilika Davelopment Authority (n.d.). Chilika at a glance. https://www.chilika.com/chilika-at-a-glance.php. Accessed 11 Feb 2024.
12. Nayak PK. Change and marginalisation: livelihoods, commons institutions and environmental justice in Chilika Lagoon, India [Doctoral
thesis, University of Manitoba (Canada)]. 2012. https://search.proquest.com/openview/cea902a86923be35c1281857157039fe/1.pdf?
pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750.
13. Mishra A. Dolphin-spotting, bird-watching and more on Chilika Lake. The Telegraph. 2018. https://www.telegraphindia.com/odisha/
odisha-promotes-ecotourism/cid/1310758.
14. New ecotourism hot spot to come up at Chilika. The Times of India. 2016. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bhubaneswar/new-
ecotourism-hot-spot-to-come-up-at-chilika/articleshow/54306914.cms.
15. Sarangi S, Acharya S. Poacher’s village to birds’ paradise of Mangalajodi: biodiversity conservation by ecotourism initiatives at Odisha.
Vista Int J Energy Environ Eng. 2018;3(4):69–77.
16. Mishra GA, Mishra BB. Collaborative marketing for the sustainable development of rural tourism destination: a case study of Mangalajodi,
Odisha. J Emerg Technol Innov Res. 2019;6(4):7–13. https://doi.org/10.1729/Journal.20518.
17. Kummitha HR. Stakeholders’ involvement towards sustaining ecotourism destinations: the case of social entrepreneurship at Mangalajodi
ecotourism trust in India. GeoJ Tour Geosites. 2020;29(2):636–48. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.29220-495.
18. Frayne NF, Anagnostou M, Banerjee A, Behera P, Dhar M, Amadou C, Gaye B. Reflections from Chilika-V2V field school: prospects for a
more inclusive ecotourism sector. 2022.
19. Sethy MK, Senapati AK. Perceptions towards ecotourism practice and the willingness to pay: evidence from Chilika coastal wetland
ecosystem, Odisha. Int J Geoherit Parks. 2023;11(3):497–513.
20. Sharma P, Pradhan MK. Eco-tourism as a strategy in supporting local livelihoods and protecting commons through community-based
institution. Sustaining commons: sustaining our future. The Thirteenth biennial conference of the International Association for the Study
of the Commons. 2011. https://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/7113/984.pdf.
21. Statistical Bulletin. Department of Tourism, Odisha. 2022. https://dot.odisha.gov.in/sites/default/files/2023-10/Statistical%20Bulletin%202022.
pdf.
22. Statistical Bulletin. Department of Tourism, Odisha. 2017. https://dot.odisha.gov.in/sites/default/files/2023-01/Statistical%20-2017_3.pdf.
23. Statistical Bulletin. Department of Tourism, Odisha. 2018. https://dot.odisha.gov.in/sites/default/files/2022-06/Statistical%20Bulletin%202018_
2.pdf.
1.pdf.
25. Statistical Bulletin. Department of Tourism, Odisha. 2020. https://dot.odisha.gov.in/sites/default/files/2022-06/Statistical%20Bulletin%202020%
20%281%29.pdf.
1.pdf.
27. Nayak PK, Berkes F. Whose marginalisation? Politics around environmental injustices in India’s Chilika Lagoon. Local Environ. 2010;15(6):553–67.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2010.487527.
28. Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. 2nd ed. California: Sage Publications; 1994.
29. O’Leary Z. The essential guide to doing research. 1st ed. London: Sage; 2004.
30. Bernard H. Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. California: SAGE Publications Inc; 2013.
31. Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson J. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods.
2006;18:59–82.
32. Warren CA. Qualitative interviewing. In: Gubrium JF, Holstein JA, editors. Handbook of interview research: context and method. SAGE: Thousand
Oaks; 2002. p. 83–101.
33. Hede AM. Managing special events in the new era of the triple bottom line. Event Manag. 2007;11(1–2):13–22.
34. Stoddard JE, Pollard CE, Evans MR. The triple bottom line: a framework for sustainable tourism development. Int J Hosp Tour Adm.
2012;13(3):233–58.
35. Faux J, Dwyer L. Triple bottom line reporting of tourism organizations to support sustainable development. In: Best education network module.
Sydney: University of Technology Sydney; 2009. p. 1–47.
Vol:.(1234567890)
36. Buckley R. Environmental inputs and outputs in ecotourism: geotourism with a positive triple bottom line? J Ecotour. 2003;2(1):76–82.
37. Wondirad A, Tolkach D, King B. Stakeholder collaboration as a major factor for sustainable ecotourism development in developing countries.
Tour Manag. 2020;78: 104024.
38. Swangjang K, Kornpiphat P. Does ecotourism in a Mangrove area at Klong Kone, Thailand, conform to sustainable tourism? A case study using
SWOT and DPSIR. Environ Dev Sustain. 2021;23(11):15960–85.
39. Chan R, Bhatta K. Ecotourism planning and sustainable community development: theoretical perspectives for Nepal. South Asian J Tour Herit.
2013;6(1):69–96.
40. Equitable Tourism Options—EQUATIONS. (2021). Ecotourism in Chilika: a critical glance. Bangalore. https://equitabletourism.org/file-downl
oad/download/public/1122.
41. Performance Audit on Conservation of Coastal Ecosystems. Report. No. 4. Union Government (Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate
Change). 2022. https://cag.gov.in/en/audit-report/details/116707.
42. Lima CD, Marsh H, Hamann M, Sinha A, Arthur R, Dolphin Á, Fisher Á. Positive interactions between Irrawaddy Dolphins and artisanal fishers
in the Chilika Lagoon of Eastern India are driven by ecology, socioeconomics, and culture. Ambio. 2014;43:614–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s13280-013-0440-4.
43. Kulkarni UD, Khan AN, Gavali RS. Rate of siltation in Wular Lake, (Jammu and Kashmir, India) with special emphasis on its climate & tectonics.
Int J Clim Change Impacts Responses. 2009;1(3):233.
44. Schindler DW. Recent advances in the understanding and management of eutrophication. Limnol Oceanogr. 2006;51:356–63.
45. Mahapatro D, Panigrahy RC, Panda S. Coastal Lagoon: present status and future challenges. Int J Mar Sci. 2013;3(23):178–86.
46. Sobhani P, Esmaeilzadeh H, Mohammad S, Sadeghi M. Estimation of ecotourism carrying capacity for sustainable development of protected
areas in Iran. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:1059.
47. Chougule B. Environmental carrying capacity and ecotourism development. Int J Econ Issues. 2011;4(1):45–54.
48. Meilani MM, Andayani W, Faida LRW, Maryudi A. Ecotourism in Sebangau National Park: an avenue to enhance local community livelihoods
while protecting the ecosystem. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2019;399: 012112.
49. Wildlife Odisha. 2021. https://wildlife.odisha.gov.in/Publication.
50. Wildlife Odisha. 2022. https://wildlife.odisha.gov.in/Publication.
51. Roadmap for Development of Ecotourism Sector in Odisha. Ernst & Young LLP. Published in India. 2022. Eco tourism roadmap.indd (odisha.
gov.in).
52. Odisha State Forest Headquarters, official website of PCCF & HoFF Odisha, Bhubaneswar. Forest, Environment and Climate Change Depart-
ment, Government of Odisha. 2024. https://odishaforest.in/eco-tourism.
53. IPE Global. 2014–17. https://www.ipeglobal.com/preparation-of-tourism-master-plan-for-the-chilika-lake-its-catchment-in-odisha-under-
integrated-coastal-zone-management-plan-iczmp-odisha-india/.
54. P. T. O. I. Mangalajodi ecotourism trust wins prestigious UNWTO award. Business Standard. 2018. https://www.business-standard.com/artic
le/pti-stories/mangalajodi-ecotourism-trust-wins-prestigious-unwto-award-118011900361_1.html.
55. Mohanty S. Ecotourism: a key driver of sustainable development. Int J Acad Res Dev. 2017;2(6):900–3.
56. Sethi L, Sethi N. Do green finance, green technology innovation, and institutional quality help achieve environmental sustainability? Evidence
from the developing economies. Sustain Dev. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2811.
57. National Strategy for Ecotourism. Ministry of Tourism, Government of India. 2022. https://tourism.gov.in/sites/default/files/202209/National%
20Strategy%20for%20Ecotourism%202022.pdf.
58. Chilika Newsletter Series. Volume I–VI. Retrieved from Chilika Development Authority and Wetlands International—South Asia. 2024. https://
south-asia.wetlands.org/publications/chilika-newsletter-series/.
59. Pasape L, Anderson W, Lindi G. Good governance strategies for sustainable ecotourism in Tanzania. J Ecotour. 2015;14(2–3):145–65.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14724049.2015.1065834.
Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Vol.:(0123456789)

Discover Sustainability

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Discover Sustainability

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Discover Sustainability

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Discover Sustainability

Stakeholder engagement in advancing sustainable ecotourism:

Received: 12 January 2024 / Accepted: 21 March 2024

© The Author(s) 2024 OPEN

Keywords Biodiversity · Livelihoods · Sustainability · Stakeholders · Ecotourism · Chilika · DPSIR

Discover Sustainability (2024) 5:50 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00233-2

1.1 Status of tourists and wildlife census in Odisha and Chilika

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Fig. 2 Tourists visit—domes- Domestic Tourists Visit Foreign Tourist Visit

Total Tourist Visit

Fig. 3 Wildlife census (birds 14 200 188

Odisha (2022) (https://​wildl​ife.​ 12 10.71 10.74

Table 1 Growth rate of Year Total Growth (in %)

Fig. 4 Map of Lake Chilika (Source: https://​www.​chili​ka.​com/​how-​to-​reach.​php)

3 Assessment of the DPSIR framework

demands social, physical, financial) Wildlife conservation and imposing a

3.3 State: understanding the carrying capacity

3.4 Impact: an example of Mangalajodi ecotourism, Chilika

3.5 Response: nature camps of Chilika

5 Future actions for further research and recommendations

6 Limitations of the study

See Tables 4, 5, 6, and 7.

1 Odisha tourism policy 2022 Report

Table 5 Number of Stakeholder No. of respond-

Table 6 Socio-demographic Variables N = 42(%)

The variable types are referred from Pasape et al. [59]

Table 7 Databases and Data base Number of journal articles

‘[ ]’ represents the keywords entered in the search tab of the database

You might also like

1.1 Status of tourists and wildlife census in Odisha and Chilika

Odisha (2022) (https://wildlife. 12 10.71 10.74

Fig. 4 Map of Lake Chilika (Source: https://www.chilika.com/how-to-reach.php)

3 Assessment of the DPSIR framework

3.3 State: understanding the carrying capacity

3.4 Impact: an example of Mangalajodi ecotourism, Chilika

3.5 Response: nature camps of Chilika

5 Future actions for further research and recommendations

6 Limitations of the study