Report Icc Prev 037 B Prem Usa
Report Icc Prev 037 B Prem Usa
Report Icc Prev 037 B Prem Usa
VOLUME 37
PHTHALIC ANHYDRIDE
ISSUE B
PHTHALIC ANHYDRIDE
PRODUCTION FROM
NAPHTHALENE
REPORT-ICC-PREV-037-B-PREM-USA
This report is part of a series of reports prepared by Intratec approaching the production costs of
commodities spanning a diverse range of industries: Oil & Energy; Fertilizers & Gases; Olefins &
Derivatives; Aromatics & Derivatives; Alcohols & Organic Acids; Polymers; Inorganic Chemicals;
Food & Nutrition; Metals & Mining; and Pharmaceuticals.
How to cite this report: Intratec. 2024. Phthalic Anhydride Production from Naphthalene, Report
ICC-PREV-037-B-PREM-USA. In: Intratec Commodity Production Costs, Series XXXX. Volume 37
(Phthalic Anhydride). Issue B. Premium Edition. Rev 0.
The information in this report is given in good faith and belief in its accuracy, but Intratec does not
guarantee its accuracy, reliability, or quality; any such information, or resulting analyses, may be
incomplete, inaccurate, or condensed. In no event shall Intratec be liable to readers or any other
person or entity for any direct, indirect, special, exemplary, punitive, or consequential damages,
including lost profits, based on breach of warranty, contract, negligence, strict liability or otherwise,
arising from the use of this Report. Intratec retains all proprietary rights subsisting in this Report.
The reader further agrees to refrain from any general release of the information presented in this
Report, so as to constitute passage of title into the public domain or otherwise jeopardize common
law or statutory copyright. For further information, the reader is referred to the appendix “General
Terms & Conditions.”
This Report is provided for the reader internal business purposes only and may not be shared with
third parties. No part of this Report may be used externally, reproduced, transmitted, distributed,
unless if previously requested in accordance with Intratec License Terms and properly permitted by
Intratec in written. For further information on restrictions on the use of this Report, the reader is
referred to the appendix “Report Use Restrictions.”
Intratec reports are, and always will be, dedicated to
all "special fathers" who diligently teach their sons the pleasure and
importance of working hard and honestly
and to all "special sons" who, without words, teach their fathers gems
of life that often go unnoticed.
Abstract
This report presents Phthalic Anhydride manufacturing cost analysis of Phthalic Anhydride
production from naphthalene. The process examined is similar to the one developed by Badger. In
this process, naphthalene is oxidized by air in a fluidized bed reactor, yielding Phthalic Anhydride
product.
This report examines Phthalic Anhydride plant capital costs and the continuing operating costs
associated with the plant. The analysis assumes a plant based in the United States with a capacity
of 100.00 kt of Phthalic Anhydride per year and includes:
* Phthalic Anhydride plant capital cost details, including ISBL, OSBL and Contingency; owner's
cost; working capital; and costs incurred during industrial plant commissioning and start-up.
* Operating cost, broken down by variable costs (raw materials, utilities); fixed costs
(maintenance, operating labor, plant overhead, property taxes and insurance); and depreciation.
* Phthalic Anhydride production process information including block flow diagram (BFD), process
flow diagram (PFD) and description of industrial site installations.
Keywords: Unsaturated Polyester, UPR, Phthalic Acid, Fluidized Bed Reactor, Sherwin-Williams,
Badger
The following pages present a history of revisions and main changes made in the last updates of
the report “Phthalic Anhydride Production from Naphthalene.” The changes in each revision are
classified according to the types presented below:
* Fix: errors correction in a released report (e.g., typos, wrong descriptions/economic figures).
* Update: changes made by the Intratec team in the release of a new Series of reports (e.g.,
change of a technical parameter published in a more recent patent).
Rev. 0 Original
The list below presents the main changes made in the “Phthalic Anhydride Production from
Naphthalene” report released in previous Series.
Reports Organization
Intratec Commodity Production Costs is a set of best-in-class professional reports that can be
understood as an encyclopedia approaching plant capital and operating costs of commodities’
manufacturing processes. The Intratec Commodity Production Costs reports are organized in a
particular fashion, as shown in the diagram presented on the next page. The diagram shows that
the reports are organized in Quarterly Series according to the period of the economic analysis
presented. Every new quarter Intratec reviews the entire Series – new reports are developed, and
existing reports are updated. After the release of a new Series, the reports from previous Series
stop being sold. Currently, each Series includes more than 800 reports.
The reports Series are divided into Volumes, with each Volume focusing on processes for
manufacturing a specific commodity. The entire Series approaches more than 250 commodities
(Volumes), spanning a diverse range of industries. Each Volume, in turn, is composed of Issues,
each one targeting a specific industrial process to produce the respective commodity.
Each report is identified by a unique code, containing the information related to the Series, Volume,
Issue, Edition, and Location used as basis in the economic analysis. An example of code is
presented below.
* Compact Edition. This Edition describes the industrial plant, including main process units and
site infrastructure, and presents an independent economic analysis through summarized
figures. It is perfect for those looking for a brief overview of the process, and an objective
understanding of its economics.
* Detailed Edition. This Edition includes, besides all the content from the Compact Edition,
additional assumptions and further details related to the economic analysis. This Edition is
suggested for the readers interested in a more comprehensive analysis and concerned in
understanding each assumption used in the development of the Issue.
* Premium Edition. This is the most popular and detailed Edition offered for a given Issue. It
includes everything from the Detailed Edition plus additional economic and technical
information about the process, which enables readers to go deeper in their analysis. This
version is an excellent starting point for readers interested in checking different scenarios and
developing more in-depth studies.
For more information about the content of each Edition, the reader is referred to the Table of
Contents of each report.
Intratec offers technical support via email provided only for customers who have purchased the
Premium Edition of Intratec Commodity Production Costs reports. The support provided refers
exclusively to the content of the report purchased.
For information about the terms of technical support (available only in the Premium Edition),
customers are referred to: https://intrat.ec/icc-report-support.
To understand how to upgrade to Premium Edition of this report, the reader is referred to:
https://intrat.ec/icc-report-upgrade.
The countries covered by the Commodity Costs of Production reports are: United States,
Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany,
Greece, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, Norway,
Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea,
Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, and United Kingdom.
Identification
This report, “Report ICC-PREV-037-B-PREM-USA,” corresponds to the Issue B of a set of reports
which is part of Volume 37, released in the Series XXXX. More specifically, this report refers to:
Series XXXX Quarter (XX) and year (XXXX) used as basis for the economic
analysis
Country USA The economic analysis presented in this report is based on a plant
located in the United States
Readers should keep in mind the limitations of this report, as both the technical data and economic
assessment are subject to certain constraints.
Technical Data. The preliminary design of the process is based on fast techniques that rely on
reduced design efforts. The goal of such preliminary design is exclusively to represent the process
in sufficient detail for supporting capital and operating costs estimation within the accuracy
expected: class 4 budgetary estimates. Therefore, the technical data presented must not be
confused with an actual conceptual process design and must not be used as such.
Economic Assessment. The economic assessment presented in this report, developed for the
period XXXX, assumes the construction of an industrial facility based in the United States. This
means that capital and operating costs estimates presented are based on several general
assumptions (e.g., average market figures for raw materials, chemicals and utilities prices, labor
costs, taxes, and duties), believed to suitably portray local conditions for the period of analysis
informed, on a country-level basis. Accordingly, the economic assessment provided in this report
is not meant to fit any specific industrial venture, which would involve a wealth of specific data and
assumptions not herein considered.
Finally, it is important to highlight mistakes to avoid when using Intratec Commodity Production
Costs reports:
* The reports are not process design packages nor engineering documentation of any kind.
* The content of our reports is not tailored to customers' demands. On the contrary, all reports
share the same structure (types of graphs, tables, and descriptions) and depth of content, and
the content itself is the result of Intratec development methodology.
* Intratec reports are not consulting services, though users are free to use the information in
conjunction with their own data or hire consulting firms for specialized analyses.
Abstract i
Revision Control ii
Preamble iv
Table of Contents ix
List of Tables xv
Chapters
Description 5.4
Assumptions 6.1
Description 6.2
Assumptions 8.2
Assumptions 9.2
References 13.1
Materials & Utilities Pricing Data - United States * Only in Detailed & Premium Editions * B.1
Capital Costs Details - United States * Only in Detailed & Premium Editions * C.1
Operating Costs Details - United States * Only in Detailed & Premium Editions * D.1
Depreciation D.3
Product Value Details - United States * Only in Detailed & Premium Editions * E.1
Process Flow Diagrams & Equipment List * Only in Premium Edition * I.1
A.1 Net Utility Consumption Rates (per metric ton of Phthalic Anhydride)
A.2 Net Utility Generation Rates (per metric ton of Phthalic Anhydride)
G.2 Operating Cost & Product Value Analysis for Different Capacities (USD/mt)
ft feet
HP high pressure
IT information technology
kWh kilowatt-hour
LP low pressure
m3 cubic meter
MM million
MP medium pressure
OC owner’s cost
Op. operator
RF refrigeration fluid
ST steam
Sup. supervisor
t ton
wt weight
yr year
Phthalic Anhydride (a.k.a. PHTAN) is the anhydride of phthalic acid. It was the first anhydride to be
used commercially. It appears as a colorless or white solid in the form of needles or platelets and
it has a characteristic odor, being toxic if inhaled. When mixed with water, it forms a corrosive
solution. It is mainly used to produce plasticizers.
Phthalic Anhydride must be stored separated from combustible substances, strong oxidants,
reducing substances, strong acids, and bases. It should be stored in a cool and ventilated area out
of direct sunlight and away from ignition sources and heat. Shipment of Phthalic Anhydride is
made preferably in the molten form of the product. Insulated and heated tanks are used, as are
insulated rail tank cars and tank trucks. Rail tank cars can hold about 84 t, and trucks about 20 t.
The molten form can be handled and pumped in bulk form, and as a result, is priced lower than the
solid. Solid Phthalic Anhydride is available as a flake in 1 t and 0.5 t super sacks, and 22.7 kg
multiwall bags.
Phthalic Anhydride is mainly used as an epoxy resin curing agent and vulcanization retarder. It can
also be used as an intermediate in chemical resins, dyes, and pigment production.
Table 1.1 provides a summary of the Phthalic Anhydride production cost related to the process
described in the report, based on a 100.00 mt/yr plant. Also, it presents some remarks about the
key aspects surrounding the economic analysis performed.
Table 1.1 shows the impact of variable costs in the product value — it represents approximately XX
% of the product value. Regarding the capital investment it is worth mentioning that, in order to
fulfill the infrastructure requirements assumed in the present analysis, OSBL investment represents
about XX% of the Phthalic Anhydride plant cost.
Phthalic Anhydride (a.k.a. PHTAN) is the anhydride of phthalic acid. It was the first anhydride to be
used commercially. It appears as a colorless or white solid in the form of needles or platelets and
it has a characteristic odor, being toxic if inhaled. When mixed with water, it forms a corrosive
solution. It is mainly used to produce plasticizers.
Phthalic Anhydride must be stored separated from combustible substances, strong oxidants,
reducing substances, strong acids, and bases. It should be stored in a cool and ventilated area out
of direct sunlight and away from ignition sources and heat. Shipment of Phthalic Anhydride is
made preferably in the molten form of the product. Insulated and heated tanks are used, as are
insulated rail tank cars and tank trucks. Rail tank cars can hold about 84 t, and trucks about 20 t.
The molten form can be handled and pumped in bulk form, and as a result, is priced lower than the
solid. Solid Phthalic Anhydride is available as a flake in 1 t and 0.5 t super sacks, and 22.7 kg
multiwall bags.
The uses and applications of Phthalic Anhydride may vary according to the product grade. The
main forms of Phthalic Anhydride are: technical grade (5 to 8% moisture) and pure (99.8%
minimum purity).
Phthalic Anhydride is mainly used as an epoxy resin curing agent and vulcanization retarder. It can
also be used as an intermediate in chemical resins, dyes, and pigment production.
Phthalic Anhydride can be used in the manufacture of other products, including dioctyl phthalate;
phenolphthalein; unsaturated polyester resin; o-benzoylbenzoic acid; phthalimide.
Other Issues, shown in the diagram, are focused on other Phthalic Anhydride production
processes. Brief descriptions of some of such industrial processes are presented below.
Issue A
It illustrates the Phthalic Anhydride production from o-xylene. In this plant, o-xylene is submitted to
a vapor phase oxidation, yielding Phthalic Anhydride product. See reference:
* Intratec. XXXX. Phthalic Anhydride Production from o-Xylene (Conventional Process), Report
ICC-XXXX-37-A-PREM-USA. In: Intratec Commodity Production Costs, Series XXXX. Volume 37
(Phthalic Anhydride). Issue A. Premium Edition. Available at: www.intratec.us/icc/037-A.
Issue C
It illustrates the Phthalic Anhydride production from o-xylene. In this process, the fixed-bed
catalytic oxidation occurs with air/o-xylene weight ratio of 9.5:1, yielding Phthalic Anhydride
product. See reference:
* Intratec. XXXX. Phthalic Anhydride Production from o-Xylene (Low Air Ratio Process), Report
ICC-XXXX-37-C-PREM-USA. In: Intratec Commodity Production Costs, Series XXXX. Volume 37
(Phthalic Anhydride). Issue C. Premium Edition. Available at: www.intratec.us/icc/037-C.
More specifically, the current chapter approaches technical aspects of the Phthalic Anhydride
production process examined including technology maturity assessment and description of the
products generated and the process inputs.
The process technology under study was categorized according to its maturity. The technical
maturity, while a measure of performance, reliability and operating experience associated with the
technology being assessed, serves as an important input in the definition of assumptions that have
a relevant impact on process economics (e.g., process contingency, project contingency, costs
related to start-up inefficiencies and R&D, etc.).
The process technology maturity is defined by the Intratec team through a method adapted from
the so-called Technology Readiness Level (TRL) method, developed by NASA, and nowadays used
in a broad range of sectors/industries. There are nine TRLs, which describe the maturity of a
technology, from basic technology research to system testing, launch and operations.
Originally intended to support decision-making over research and development activity, the nine
technology readiness levels were divided into five major classes to portray the maturity level of
chemical process technologies, from “concept” to “established technology.” Table 3.1 describes
such five classes according to which the Intratec team classifies technologies being studied, as
well as the TRLs included within each class.
Inputs Description
Raw Material(s)
XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX
Utilities
XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX
This chapter presents the industrial site configuration for the Phthalic Anhydride production
process examined. In short, the information presented in this chapter is based on commonly
utilized concepts related to the type of installations found within a typical industrial site. These
concepts include:
* Process unit. Also known as inside battery units, these installations comprise all main units of
the site required to modify the input stream and obtain the target output. These units are located
Inside the Battery Limits (ISBL).
* Infrastructure. Also known as outside battery units or offsite facilities, these installations do
not directly enter into the modification of the process input stream. They are support buildings,
auxiliary units used for providing and distributing utilities and storage facilities. These units are
located Outside the Battery Limits (OSBL).
In order to make a better distinction between these types of installation, a diagram is presented in
Figure 4.1. The diagram also provides an insightful overview of the industrial site as whole, and
helps to clarify which raw materials and utilities are supplied to the process unit and which
products and utilities are generated.
This chapter presents the process unit associated with the Phthalic Anhydride production from
naphthalene. The process examined is similar to the one developed by Badger.
Basically, the process unit is the core of an industrial site. Comprising the site’s battery limits
(ISBL), it may be complex and involve several pieces of equipment. In this context, to facilitate the
understanding, the process unit related to the Phthalic Anhydride manufacturing process under
analysis is presented in the next pages through the use of a block flow diagram followed by a
comprehensive description.
It is important to mention that some aspects of the Phthalic Anhydride production process
examined are either industrial secrets, not published in patents, or have changed, but were not
reported in the literature at the time this report was developed. That being the case, the design
herein presented is partially based on Intratec process synthesis knowledge such that there may
be some differences between the industrial process actually employed and the Phthalic Anhydride
manufacturing process described in this study. Nevertheless, the design presented suitably
represents the technology examined in sufficient detail to estimate the economics of the
technology within the degree of accuracy expected from conceptual evaluations.
In general, block flow diagrams consist of a series of blocks, representing unit operations or
groups of equipment, connected by input and output streams. In fact, there are no strict standards
according to which such diagrams are made.
To facilitate the presentation of the process unit under analysis, Intratec developed block flow
diagrams according to some standards. The process areas represented correspond to a
“functional unit.” Basically, a “functional unit” is a significant step in the process in which a
particular physico-chemical operation (i.e., distillation, reaction, evaporation) occurs. According to
this definition, a given functional unit is not associated with a single piece of equipment, but rather
with a group of equipment and ancillaries required to perform a particular operation.
The blocks representing process areas also show key technical parameters related to these areas,
including: the highest operating temperature and pressure, representative material of construction,
and other parameters.
As to the process streams represented, there is an indication of their phase. Also, such streams
may provide a global material balance of the process, normalized by the mass flow rate of the
product considered in the analysis. In other words, the number near each stream represents the
ratio between its mass flow rate and the output flow rate of the product under analysis.
It is worth noting that areas having no significant impact on the economics of the process may not
be included in the diagram. Similarly, some streams may also not be represented. Nevertheless,
the diagram presented is still extremely useful in providing readers with an overall understanding
of the process studied.
The following block flow diagram illustrates the functional units related to the process under
analysis.
Further Details
For more information on how the process examined was divided into functional units, the
reader is referred to https://intrat.ec/m?f=/icc-methodology.
Description
The Phthalic Anhydride production process under analysis is briefly described below. For clarity,
the description was divided according to the process areas indicated in the block flow diagram.
* XX - XXXXXXXXX
* XX - XXXXXXXXX
* XX - XXXXXXXXX
* XX - XXXXXXXXX
* XX - XXXXXXXXX
* XX - XXXXXXXXX
This chapter describes the infrastructure requirements associated with the Phthalic Anhydride
production process examined. Basically, infrastructure requirements comprise the offsite facilities,
or the units located Outside the Battery Limits (OSBL). The OSBL usually have a significant impact
on the capital cost estimates associated with any new industry venture. This impact is largely
dictated by, among other things: specific conditions where the industrial site will be erected; the
level of integration the new site will have with nearby facilities or industrial complexes; and
assurance and promptness in the supply of chemicals.
Assumptions
The infrastructure requirements of the industrial site examined were defined according to the
assumptions listed below.
Note
According to the literature focused on the economic analysis of processes, the costs
associated with waste treatment typically range from 0.5% to 5% of plant cost per year (See
references M14, M15). However, since such costs may significantly vary from process to
process and according to plant location, Intratec recommends a specific study for more
accurate estimates.
Description
The offsite facilities were divided into areas according to their type/function. These areas are
listed in the following pages, as well as a description about the major equipment, systems and
facilities included in each of them.
This chapter presents the process requirements to operate an industrial site of the Phthalic
Anhydride production process examined. More specifically, the next pages provide key process
indicators and the operators required to run the process equipment of the Phthalic Anhydride
manufacturing process examined (in accordance with the block flow diagram and the global
material balance previously presented).
The following tables show key process indicators of the technology examined. In other words,
these indicators reflect the raw materials consumption in Table 7.1 rates per metric ton of Phthalic
Anhydride.
It should be noted that estimation of raw material requirements in the conceptual design phase is
usually reasonably accurate, but tends to be somewhat understated compared to real operations.
Losses from vessel vents, unscheduled equipment, inerting systems, physical property
inaccuracies, startup, shutdown, and other process operations not typically addressed in this
phase may increase raw materials consumption.
Labor Requirements
Table 7.2 presents the number of operators per shift required to run the equipment of the process
examined, as well as the personnel per shift required to directly supervise the operating labor.
This chapter presents Phthalic Anhydride plant capital costs associated with Phthalic Anhydride
production from naphthalene, from design to industrial plant startup.
The costs that comprise the total Phthalic Anhydride plant capital costs are grouped under three
major costs:
* Fixed capital. Depreciable capital invested in the construction of the industrial plant and
making it operational. It comprises the Phthalic Anhydride plant cost and owner’s cost,
expenses required to make the plant operational (i.e., initial catalyst load in reactors, prepaid
royalties, and miscellaneous costs).
* Working capital. Funds for getting the plant into operation and meeting subsequent
obligations. It includes raw materials inventory, products inventory, in-process inventory,
supplies and stores, accounts receivable and accounts payable.
Further Details
For more information about how the capital costs were estimated, the reader is referred to
https://intrat.ec/m?f=/icc-methodology.
WORKING CAPITAL
PROCESS
OUTSIDE BATTERY LIMITS (OSBL) INVESTMENT CAPITAL
PROCESS CONTINGENCY
Assumptions
The estimates included in this chapter are based on the following assumptions:
Table 8.1 summarizes all major Phthalic Anhydride plant capital costs that comprise the total
capital investment, from the design and construction of an industrial site to plant startup.
Component MM USD %
Plant cost XXX XX
Owner’s cost XXX XX
Total fixed capital XXX XX
Working capital XXX XX
Additional capital XXX XX
Total capital investment XXX XX
Figure 8.2 presents a graphical representation of the total capital investment breakdown.
This chapter presents ongoing costs required for Phthalic Anhydride production from naphthalene.
Also referred to as operational expenditures (OPEX), these encompass costs associated with the
plant operation and depreciation. In the current analysis, the operating cost was grouped under
three major costs:
* Operating variable costs. Costs directly proportional to the actual operating rate of the
industrial site. Such costs include raw materials and utilities (i.e., steam, electricity, fuel, and
refrigeration).
* Operating fixed costs. Operating costs directly tied to the plant capacity, but which do not
change with the operating level (i.e., operating labor, supervision labor, maintenance costs,
plant overhead).
* Depreciation. Refers to the decrease in value of industrial assets with passage of time.
It should be kept in mind that the sum of operating fixed costs and operating variable costs is
referred to as “cash cost.” The sum of cash cost with depreciation, in turn, is referred to as “total
operating cost.”
Figure 9.1, on the next page, illustrates the composition of total operating cost.
Further Details
For more information about how the operating cost components were estimated, the reader is
referred to https://intrat.ec/m?f=/icc-methodology.
LABORATORY EXPENSES
OPERATING SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL
PAYROLL CHARGES
MAINTENANCE LABOR
SUVERVISION LABOR
OPERATING LABOR
OPERATING
NET UTILITIES COST VARIABLE
COST
Assumptions
The estimates included in this chapter are based on the following assumptions:
* Plant nominal capacity: 100.00 metric ton of Phthalic Anhydride per year
The plant operating rate assumed leads to an annual throughput of XXX XXX metric ton of Phthalic
Anhydride. It is important to mention that this rate does not represent any technological limitation;
rather, it is an assumption based on usual industrial operating rates.
All costs presented in this table are derived from unit consumptions and pricing information.
Table 9.2 summarizes all operating cost by presenting its major components.
Further Details
For the breakdown of utilities cost, operating fixed costs and depreciation, the reader is
referred to “Appendix D. Operating Costs Details.”
This chapter presents the “Product Value,” a term commonly used wherein all costs associated
with the manufacture of a product are combined in order to provide a more consistent economic
analysis. It includes operating cost (operating variable costs, operating fixed costs, and
depreciation), as well as corporate overhead costs and an expected Return on Capital Employed
(ROCE). Figure 10.1 illustrates the composition of the product value.
PRODUCT VALUE
ROCE
CORPORATE OVERHEAD
Table 10.1 summarizes all costs that comprise the product value in the process examined.
Figure 10.2 shows the impact of each cost component on the product value.
This chapter provides a summary of all Phthalic Anhydride production costs related to the process
described so far. Also, it presents some remarks about the key aspects surrounding the economic
analysis.
Economic Remarks
It should be noted that the risk taken into account in this analysis is limited to the technical risks
associated with the process uncertainties or inherent risks associated with the venture's industry
sector. Other venture risks, such as business environment, raw materials and product prices
variations, change in government policy, shall be evaluated case by case, and are not taken into
account here, since this is a general analysis.
It is also important to mention that product value must not be confused with product price. While
the product value is calculated based on operating cost and expected ROCE, the product price is
the actual value practiced in market transactions.
Further Details
For further clarification about the pricing assumptions used in this analysis, the reader is
referred to https://intrat.ec/m?f=/icc-methodology.
This chapter provides a brief summary of the methodology developed by Intratec for producing its
Production Cost Reports. For a more-in-depth comprehension, readers are encouraged to explore
the Intratec Commodity Production Costs – General Methodology Guide, which can be accessed at:
► https://intrat.ec/m?f=/icc-methodology
The Intratec Commodity Production Costs report is a critical tool for evaluating industrial
processes from a techno-economic perspective. Leveraging over a decade of experience in
commodities markets and process economics, Intratec has developed a robust and consistent
methodology to ensure reliable and comprehensive techno-economic evaluations.
The primary goal of the report is to deliver best-in-class economic evaluations, summarized as
shown in Table 12.1, providing trustworthy estimates for informed decision-making. This approach
offers readers clear insights into the economic viability of process technologies in dynamic
markets.
To produce high-quality reports, Intratec conducts detailed research into raw materials, products,
and processes, including thorough technical analyses of Inside Battery Limits (ISBL) and Outside
Battery Limits (OSBL) areas. This analysis is grounded in an extensive bibliography of books,
patents, and academic papers.
For simplicity, all cost estimates are consolidated into a single item: the “Product Value.” This value
combines operating costs (variable, fixed, and depreciation), corporate overhead, and a return on
capital employed (ROCE), which reflects the capital investment.
All Intratec reports that approach industrial processes have a common structure, i.e., indexes,
tables, and charts share similar standards. This ensures that Intratec’s readers know upfront what
they will get and, more than that, will be able to compare technologies addressed in different
reports.
Our methodology is continuously tested and validated by manufacturers, R&D centers, EPC
companies, financial institutions, and government agencies that rely on our reports. Figure 12.1
illustrates the methodology used in this report.
Complementary Documents
In addition to the full analysis methodology (https://intrat.ec/m?f=/icc-methodology), Intratec
provides two other documents with complementary information to this report: “Glossary &
Abbreviations” and “Unit Conversion.”
The “Glossary & Abbreviations” document contains definitions of important commodity market
terms found in this report and our other products. Access it at: https://intrat.ec/glossary.
The “Unit Conversion” table presents unit conversion factors for several length, mass, energy
units, and more. Access it at: https://intrat.ec/unit-conversion.
Methodology References
Intratec has built its knowledge based on the most relevant text books, encyclopedias, and
technical papers related to the economic evaluation of industrial processes. Such expertise has
established a large foundation that enriches all Intratec reports, in a way that the reader can expect
the most trustworthy information.
The methodology references reflect this foundation of bibliographical data, used in the
development of all Intratec Commodity Production Costs reports, particularly in the elaboration of
the methodology employed, detailed in Chapter 12.
[M1] Acland, M., et al. 2012. Cost Estimation Handbook (2nd ed.). The Australasian Institute of
Mining and Metallurgy
[M2] Baasel, W. D.. 1989. Preliminary Chemical Engineering Plant Design (2nd ed.). Springer
[M3] Brennan, D.. 2020. Process Industry Economics (2nd ed.). Institution of Chemical
Engineers
[M4] Chauvel, A.; Fournier, G.; Raimbault, C.. 2003. Manual of Process Economic Evaluation (4th
ed.). Editions Technip
[M5] Couper J. R.. 2003. Process Engineering Economics (1st ed.). CRC Press
[M6] Gerrard, A. M.. 2000. Guide to Capital Cost Estimating (4th ed.). Institution of Chemical
Engineers
[M7] Humphreys. K. K.. 2004. Project and Cost Engineers’ Handbook (4th ed.). CRC Press
[M8] Humphreys K. K.; Wellman, P.. 1995. Basic Cost Engineering (3rd ed., Revised and
Expanded). CRC Press
[M10] Lange, J. P.. 2001. Fuels and Chemicals Manufacturing - Guidelines for Understanding and
Minimizing the Production Costs. CatTech V.5 no 2. pp. 82-95
[M11] Marsden, R. S.; Craven, P. J.; Taylor, J. H.. 1982. A New Technique for Estimating Process
Energy Cost at The Predesign Stage. Transaction of the 7th International Cost Engineering
Congress
[M12] Matthews, L. M.. 1983. Estimating Manufacturing Costs A Practical Guide for Managers &
Estimators (1st ed.). McGraw-Hill Companies
[M13] Peters, M. S.; Timmerhaus, K. D.; West, R. E.. 2002. Plant Design and Economics for
Chemical Engineers (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education
[M14] Pike, R. W.. 2015. Essentials of Economic Decision Analysis for Chemical Engineering (1st
ed.). CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform
[M15] Tedder, W. T.. 2005. Preliminary Chemical Process Design & Economics. Hickory Mountain
[M16] Towler, G., Sinnott, R. 2021. Chemical Engineering Design Principles, Practice and
Economics of Plant and Process Design (3rd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann
[M17] Tsagkari, M., Couturier J., Dubois, J., and Kokossis, A.. 2015. Heuristics for Capital Cost
Estimation: A Case Study on Biorefinery Processes.
[M18] Turton, R.; Bailie, R. C.; Whiting, W. B.; Shaeiwitz, J. A.; Bhattacharyya, D.. 2012. Analysis,
Synthesis, and Design of Chemical Processes (4th ed.). Prentice Hall
[M19] Ulrich, G. D.; Vasudevan, P. T.. 2003. Chemical Engineering Process Design and
Economics: A Practical Guide (2nd ed.). CRC Press
Analysis References
The analysis references present the foundation of this Phthalic Anhydride production cost report,
providing information required to fully understand the industrial process addressed and to
formulate the assumptions considered. These references, presented below, may encompass
patents, encyclopedias, textbooks, academic or professional researches, technical papers and any
other non-confidential information publicly available, duly reviewed by Intratec’s team.
This appendix details the key utilities consumption indicators of the technology examined in the
report. In other words, these indicators reflect the net utilities consumption rates per metric ton of
Phthalic Anhydride produced presented in Table A.1.
Table A.1 Net Utility Consumption Rates (per metric ton of Phthalic Anhydride)
It should be noted that estimation of utility requirements in the conceptual design phase is usually
fairly accurate, but tends to be somewhat low compared to real operations. Losses from vessel
vents, unscheduled equipment, inerting systems, physical property inaccuracies, startup, shutdown
and other process operations not typically addressed in this phase may increase utilities
consumption.
This appendix presents details of the pricing data used in the economic analysis within this report.
The economic analysis presented is based on the prices seen in Table B.1.
Historical Prices
The evolution of material costs over the past three years is depicted in the following pages.
This appendix details Phthalic Anhydride plant cost, working capital and additional capital,
discussed in “Chapter 8. Capital Costs Summary.”
Fixed capital constitutes the fraction of the capital investment which is depreciable. It includes the
Phthalic Anhydride plant cost and owner's cost.
Plant Cost
The Phthalic Anhydride plant cost, i.e., the cost related to the construction of the industrial site
itself, is broken down into the components presented in Table C.1.
The lower and upper limits for the Phthalic Anhydride plant cost figures, according to the accuracy
range expected from conceptual evaluations presented in this report, are also presented in Table
C.1. The presented range is associated with a confidence level of 90%.
Further Details
For more information about the breakdowns for the Phthalic Anhydride plant capital cost, the
reader is referred to “Appendix F. Plant Cost Breakdowns.”
Owner's Cost
The owner's cost encompasses the expenses required to make the plant operational. Its
components are presented in Table C.2.
Component MM USD %
Plant cost XXX XX
Owner’s cost XXX XX
Total fixed capital XXX XX
Further Details
For more information about each cost presented in this appendix, the reader is referred to
https://intrat.ec/m?f=/icc-methodology
Working capital, i.e., the funds for getting the plant into operation and meeting subsequent
obligations, is broken down in Table C.4.
Additional capital requirements are one-time expenses related to bringing a process on stream
during plant start-up. Table C.5 presents the breakdown of this cost with all its components.
This appendix details utilities cost, operating fixed cost and depreciation, discussed in “ Chapter 9.
Operating Costs.”
Utilities cost component encompasses costs related to a plant’s consumption of steam, electricity,
fuel, and refrigeration. Table D.1 summarizes net utility costs for this cost analysis.
Further Details
For more information about how the utilities cost components were estimated, the reader is
referred to https://intrat.ec/m?f=/icc-methodology.
Figure D.1 illustrates the utilities with greatest impact on the total utility consumption.
Operating costs directly tied to the plant capacity, but which do not change with the operating level.
Table D.2 presents the breakdown of operating fixed cost.
Depreciation
In this study, the depreciation unit cost corresponds to XXX USD/mt of Phthalic
Anhydride produced. This calculation was based on the straight-line method and a project
economic life of 10 years for both the core production unit (ISBL assets) and owner's assets, and
20 years for the site infrastructure (OSBL assets).
Further Details
For more information about how operating fixed costs components and depreciation were
estimated, the reader is referred to https://intrat.ec/m?f=/icc-methodology.
This appendix details corporate overhead costs and the return on capital employed, both of which
make up the product value, presented in “Chapter 10. Product Value Analysis.”
Corporate overhead is associated with costs incurred by a company’s head office. Table E.1
presents a breakdown of corporate overhead costs.
ROCE assumptions can vary according to the industry sector and technology readiness. For this
specific process a ROCE percentage of XX% was assumed. This results in an increment of XXX
USD/metric ton in the product value.
This appendix describes details of the plant cost which comprises the costs, directly or indirectly,
associated with the construction of the plant itself. Therefore, different breakdowns are presented
for a better understanding of the total cost associated with the construction of the plant under
analysis, as follows:
* ISBL cost by functional unit. This section provides the contribution of each functional unit
portrayed in the process block flow diagram in the cost of the inside battery limits (ISBL).
* OSBL cost by piece of equipment. This section provides a distribution of the investment
required for the construction of the areas that comprise the site surrounding infrastructure, as
well as it details the share of the costs of each component included in these areas.
* Plant cost breakdown per discipline. In this breakdown, the plant construction costs are
rearranged into an alternative perspective: direct process costs, indirect process costs and
project contingency.
In accordance with all the assumptions presented in this report, a cost estimate was developed for
each functional unit inside battery limits (ISBL). Table F.1 shows the share of each functional unit.
Description %
XXXXXXXXX XX
XXXXXXXXX XX
XXXXXXXXX XX
XXXXXXXXX XX
XXXXXXXXX XX
XXXXXXXXX XX
XXXXXXXXX XX
XXXXXXXXX XX
Process Unit (ISBL) Construction Cost
This analysis provides a more detailed explanation of the fixed capital associated with the process
described in the report. More specifically, it is focused on the investment required for the
construction of the site surrounding infrastructure, also referred to as Outside Battery Limits
(OSBL), comprising support buildings, auxiliary units used for providing and distributing utilities and
storage facilities. In accordance with the configuration previously presented, a cost estimate was
developed for each facility outside battery limits.
Figure F.2 presents OSBL investment broken down into each area. The investment estimated for
each area will be further detailed in the next topics.
Component Description
XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX
The following chart illustrates how each component impacts the construction cost estimate for
this area.
Component Description
XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX
The following chart illustrates how each component impacts the construction cost estimate for
this area.
* XXXXXXXXX - XX %
* XXXXXXXXX - XX %
Component Description
XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX
The following chart illustrates how each component impacts the construction cost estimate for
this area.
* XXXXXXXXX - XX%
* XXXXXXXXX - XX%
Component % of Total
XXXXXXXXX XX
XXXXXXXXX XX
XXXXXXXXX XX
Area 90 - Storage Installations XX
XXXXXXXXX XX
XXXXXXXXX XX
XXXXXXXXX XX
XXXXXXXXX XX
XXXXXXXXX XX
XXXXXXXXX XX
XXXXXXXXX XX
Area 91 - Utilities Facilities XX
XXXXXXXXX XX
XXXXXXXXX XX
XXXXXXXXX XX
XXXXXXXXX XX
XXXXXXXXX XX
XXXXXXXXX XX
XXXXXXXXX XX
XXXXXXXXX XX
XXXXXXXXX XX
Area 92 - Support & Auxiliary Buildings XX
Site Infrastructure (OSBL) Construction Cost 100.0
Introduction
The primary objective of this analysis is to provide an alternative perspective on the plant capital
cost. This analysis presents the plant capital cost divided in three categories: (1) direct costs (all
material and labor costs associated with the process equipment); (2) indirect costs (defined by the
Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering (AACE) Standard Terminology as those
“costs which do not become a final part of the installation, but which are required for the orderly
completion of the installation”); and (3) contingency.
It is important to highlight that the breakdown presented within this analysis refers exclusively to
the Plant Cost figure included in the report.
The composition of direct field costs and indirect costs are further detailed in the next topics.
Other fixed capital components, such as Owner's Cost, are not included in this breakdown.
The following chart presents the plant cost divided in each category described above.
Accordingly, the chart below presents the direct costs broken down by aforementioned discipline.
Accordingly, the chart below presents the indirect costs broken down by aforementioned items.
(1) % of BEQ. Each component is presented as a percentage of the bare equipment (BEQ) cost;
(2) % of Total. Each component is presented as a percentage of total plant cost.
The absolute cost of the plant is presented in the table “Plant Cost Summary” in “Chapter 8. Capital
Costs Summary.” It is worth noting that the process contingency presented in the aforementioned
table is included within each component listed in the table above.
This assessment presents the impact of a plant capacity change on the economic analysis
presented in this report. Additional capacity scenarios were analyzed using the same methodology
and compared to the base case presented in the report.
The assessment is divided into two parts: (1) a capital investment comparison, examining fixed
investment, working capital and additional capital requirements; and (2) an operating costs &
product value comparison.
The economic analysis presented was reproduced for a range of plant capacities in order to
estimate a curve that illustrates how capital investment varies with nominal plant output. This
curve is presented in Figure G.1.
The minimum, mid-range and maximum capacities from Figure G.1 are compared in detail in Table
G.1, which presents detailed capital cost figures to better portray how economy of scale impacts
the process under analysis.
The operating costs and the product value were also estimated for a range of plant capacities,
resulting in Figure G.2.
A datasheet summarizing the process economics is reproduced in Table G.2, and it includes two
additional scenarios evaluated in this assessment.
Operating costs
XXXXXXXXX XXX XXX XXX
XXXXXXXXX XXX XXX XXX
Gross raw materials cost XXX XXX XXX
Net raw materials cost XXX XXX XXX
Net utilities cost XXX XXX XXX
Operating variable costs XXX XXX XXX
Operating fixed costs XXX XXX XXX
Operating cash cost XXX XXX XXX
Depreciation XXX XXX XXX
Total operating cost XXX XXX XXX
Corporate overhead XXX XXX XXX
ROCE XXX XXX XXX
Product value XXX XXX XXX
This appendix aims to present a preliminary project implementation schedule, encompassing the
period from the decision to invest to the start of commercial production.
Since the project phases overlap, the total project duration is not equal to the sum of each phase
duration. The Engineering, Procurement & Construction (EPC) period - from the basic engineering
start until the end of construction - is about XX months. The total project duration, also including
commissioning and start-up, is approximately XX months.
For better comprehension, the main conventions for equipment tags and symbols for lines used in
the process flow diagram are listed in Figure I.1 and Figure I.2.
X-1001
Area Number
Equipment Type
C – Column | E – Heat Exchanger | F – Furnace | K – Compressor | P – Pump | R – Reactor |
S – Special | T – Tank | V – Vessel
Table I.1 and Table I.2 present the different codes used along with their definitions.
Code Definition
BFW Boiler feed water
CW Cooling water
DW Demineralized water
FU Fuel
HTF Heat transfer fluid
N2 Nitrogen
O2 Oxygen
PC Process condensate
PW Process water
RF Refrigerant
RW Refrigerated water
ST Steam
Code Definition
C Column
E Heat exchanger
F Furnace
K Compressor
P Pump
R Reactor
S Special
T Tank
V Vessel
Furthermore, most of the symbol standards adopted in the development of the diagram are
presented in the next figures.
Horizontal Agitated-Jacketed
Vertical Vessel Agitated Vessel Carrying Vessel Settler Clarifier
Vessel Vessel
Flat Roof Tank Conical Roof Tank Open Tank Floating Roof Tank Sphere Tank Gas Holder Bin
Vacuum
Pump Compressor Turbine Helical Rotor Liquid Jet Pump Ejector
ION
BIO
Spray
Biological Elevator 1 Conveyor Screw Conveyor
Dryer
Filter
Drying Fluid-Bed
Extruder
Oven Dryer
Our Business
In operation since 2002, Intratec is a B2B leading provider of commodity strategic data and
analyses. Our mission is to provide companies with reliable information about the commodities,
empowering our customers to make accurate, high value-added decisions.
Our AI-driven reports and analyses present independent, trustworthy data so that our customers
can focus on what they do best. Our website is an e-commerce resource where customers easily
learn about Intratec offerings and promptly order what they need. Our products focus on key
information surrounding commodities such as prices, trends and forecasts, as well as cost
structures of production processes. Our expertise spans the following commodity sectors: Oil &
Energy, Fertilizers & Gases, Olefins & Derivatives, Aromatics & Derivatives, Alcohols & Organic
Acids, Inorganic Chemicals, Polymers, Food & Nutrition, Metals & Mining, Pharmaceuticals and
Water & Utilities.
With well-designed offerings, we serve a diverse group of customers, from Fortune 500 companies
and local manufacturers to biotech startups and consultants. Our studies and data have been
used in multiple ways, such as:
Our reports detail technologies within a wide range of maturity, from established processes to
embryonic/emerging technologies. Also, our reports examine a variety of manufacturing
techniques, targeting transformation processes (e.g., nitrile gloves production), processes for
fabric and fibers production (e.g., nonwoven, carbon fiber), polymerization processes (e.g., PP, PE,
PVC), electrolytic processes (e.g., chlorine, caustic soda), fossil-based/petrochemical processes
(e.g., propylene, ethylene), processes for the production of green chemicals from renewable
sources (e.g., bioethanol, bio-based succinic acid) and others. Our Reports Library can be found at:
► https://intrat.ec/production-costs
Subscribers can track the current prices of the commodities they are most interested in, as well as
analyze historical prices and forecasts. Price assessments can be accessed through various
delivery methods: online charts for dynamic exploration, Excel Add-In for quick updates, and API for
seamless integration into existing workflows.
More information about Intratec Primary Commodity Prices can be found at:
► https://intrat.ec/commodity-price
Subscribers can track the current prices of key energy commodities, as well as analyze historical
prices and forecasts. Energy price assessments can be accessed through various delivery
methods: online charts for dynamic exploration, an Excel Add-In for quick updates, and an energy
commodity prices API for seamless integration into existing workflows.
More information about Intratec Energy Price References can be found at:
► https://intrat.ec/energy-price
Intratec Industry Economics Worldwide can be accessed through various delivery methods: online
charts for dynamic exploration, an Excel Add-In for quick updates, and an API for seamless
integration into existing workflows. Learn more about each of the tools included in this product,
below:
Intratec Industrial Utilities Prices & Costs offers trustworthy, independent references for evaluating
the costs of key utility commodities across multiple strategic countries. Subscribers can access
both historical data and forecasts of generation costs and contract prices, all displayed in a user-
friendly tool. Additionally, data are made available through Excel Add-In for quick updates and API
for seamless integration into existing workflows.
Intratec Plant Construction Cost Indexes (IC Indexes) are multipliers designed to adjust industrial
plant construction costs over time. Unlike other indexes limited to the USA, IC Indexes allow for
the updating of construction costs in up to 33 countries, making them suitable for industrial
processing plants across various sectors. These indexes offer a monthly series measuring
Intratec Plant Location Factors (IL Factors) are multipliers designed to convert industrial plant
construction costs from one country to another. These factors allow for the estimation of capital
expenditure (capex) by applying a straightforward calculation: simply multiply the known plant
construction cost from a reference country by the corresponding location factor. Suitable for
industrial processing plants across various sectors, the IL Factors cover 33 key countries,
providing an efficient method for adjusting plant construction costs between different geographical
locations.
The reader can check more information about Intratec Industry Economics Worldwide and
subscribe online at:
► https://intrat.ec/industry-economics-worldwide
Data, information, reports, tools, analyses and/or models (“Information”) presented in this Report
(“Report”) are prepared on the basis of publicly available information and non-confidential
information disclosed by third parties. Third parties, including, but not limited to technology
licensors, trade associations or marketplace participants, may have provided some of the
information on which the analyses or data are based.
The Information herein presented is developed independently by Intratec and, as such, is the
opinion of Intratec and do not represent the point of view of any third parties nor imply in any way
that they have been approved or otherwise authorized by third parties that are mentioned in this
Report.
Intratec conducts analyses and prepares Information for readers in conformance with generally
accepted professional standards. Although the statements in this Report are derived from or
based on several sources that Intratec believe to be reliable, INTRATEC DOES NOT GUARANTEE
THEIR ACCURACY, RELIABILITY, OR QUALITY; ANY SUCH INFORMATION, OR RESULTING
ANALYSES, MAY BE INCOMPLETE, INACCURATE OR CONDENSED. THE INFORMATION HEREIN
PRESENTED IN THIS REPORT IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT INTENDED
AS ANY RECOMMENDATION OF INVESTMENT.
The reader agrees it will not, without prior written consent of Intratec, represent, directly or
indirectly, that this Information have been approved or endorsed by the other parties. IN NO EVENT
SHALL INTRATEC, ITS EMPLOYEES, REPRESENTATIVES, RESELLERS OR DISTRIBUTORS BE
LIABLE TO READERS OR ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL,
EXEMPLARY, PUNITIVE, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, INCLUDING LOST PROFITS, BASED ON
BREACH OF WARRANTY, CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
FROM THE USE OF THIS REPORT, WHETHER OR NOT THEY OR IT HAD ANY KNOWLEDGE,
ACTUAL OR CONSTRUCTIVE, THAT SUCH DAMAGES MIGHT BE INCURRED.
The reader is responsible for ensuring that copyright laws are adhered to at all times. This Report
may be supplied watermarked with the reader name, email, and/or company.
Intratec General Terms and Conditions and License Terms are available at www.intratec.us/legal
This chapter is designed to help the reader understand how Intratec information and data
(INFORMATION) contained in this Report (REPORT) can be used.
Crucially, it also outlines what the reader can and cannot do with the INFORMATION and the
REPORT itself.
Intratec retains all proprietary rights subsisting in this REPORT. The reader has limited rights to
access and use this REPORT, which are governed by Intratec General Terms & Conditions, License
Terms, Order Form and Refund Policy (Agreement), agreed upon by the reader
company/organization and Intratec.
The reader may use this REPORT for his/her own internal business purposes. More specifically, in
the course of the reader business, the reader can create content derived from this REPORT for
internal use only, provided that: (i) the INFORMATION from the REPORT used in such derived
content will be insubstantial and de minimis in nature and will not be primarily a copy of the
REPORT (ii) the reader undertakes not to create derived content that uses a portion of the REPORT
that could be considered substantial; (iii) the reader acknowledges Intratec as a source in relation
to such derived content, as follows:
The reader cannot share INFORMATION with anyone outside his/her organization. Also, the reader
cannot share INFORMATION with anyone from his/her organization outside the country specified
in the Order Form.
The reader may, however, request Intratec to share INFORMATION with people outside his/her
organization on an ad-hoc basis. Upon Intratec written authorization, such sharing of
INFORMATION with third parties must comply will all conditions set forth in the License Term,
including:
a. The INFORMATION must be only a limited extract (i.e. an insubstantial amount of data provided
only on an ad hoc basis);
b. The provision of the Intratec INFORMATION is incidental to the reader business ;
c. The derived content incorporating the INFORMATION do not have any commercial value ;
d. The reader does not charge a fee for the Intratec INFORMATION and/or any products or
services incorporating the Intratec INFORMATION; and
e. The Intratec INFORMATION is shared with no more than 15 people outside the reader
organization.
The reader is required to comply with the Agreement. Intratec values its relationships with its
customers and does not want to see the reader access interrupted as a result of breach of these
terms.
b. Seek damages from Reader company for any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred by us a
result of the reader failure to comply with the Agreement.
The reader is highly encouraged to read the full Agreement. This document should not be regarded
as a substitute.