Taxonomy Update
Taxonomy Update
Taxonomy Update
IFRS® Foundation
IFRS® Accounting Taxonomy 2023
Update 2
Disclaimer: To the extent permitted by applicable law, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the IFRS Foundation
expressly disclaim all liability howsoever arising from this publication or any translation thereof whether in contract, tort or otherwise to
any person in respect of any claims or losses of any nature including direct, indirect, incidental or consequential loss, punitive damages,
penalties or costs.
Information contained in this publication does not constitute advice and should not be substituted for the services of an appropriately
qualified professional.
All rights reserved. Reproduction and use rights are strictly limited. Please contact the Foundation for further details
at [email protected].
Copies of IASB publications may be ordered from the Foundation by emailing [email protected] or by visiting our shop at https://
shop.ifrs.org.
The Foundation has trade marks registered around the world including ‘IAS®’, ‘IASB®’, the IASB® logo, ‘IFRIC®’, ‘IFRS®’, the IFRS® logo, ‘IFRS
for SMEs®’, the IFRS for SMEs® logo, the ‘Hexagon Device’, ‘International Accounting Standards®’, ‘International Financial Reporting
Standards®’, ‘NIIF®’ and ‘SIC®’. Further details of the Foundation’s trade marks are available from the Foundation on request.
The Foundation is a not-for-profit corporation under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, USA and operates in England and
Wales as an overseas company (Company number: FC023235) with its principal office in the Columbus Building, 7 Westferry Circus, Canary
Wharf, London, E14 4HD.
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
CONTENTS
from page
INTRODUCTION 4
Why has the IFRS® Foundation changed the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy? 4
What is common practice? 4
What are general improvements? 4
What are technology changes? 4
IFRS Accounting Taxonomy due process 5
Reading this Update 5
Documentation and guidance labels 5
XBRL properties 5
Editorial corrections to the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy 6
IFRS Accounting Taxonomy files 6
COMMON PRACTICE—FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS 7
Scope of the financial instruments common practice review 7
Statement of financial position 7
Statement of cash flows 14
GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS 19
Introducing categorical elements 19
Reconciliation of property, plant and equipment including right-of-use assets 24
Tagging of fair value of investment property measured at cost 28
Removal of restrictive text from member documentation labels 29
Continuing and discontinued operations axis 29
TECHNOLOGY AND ARCHITECTURAL CHANGES 31
Calculation 1.1 31
Labelling of axis default members 31
APPENDIX A—IFRS® ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY CONTENT TERMINOLOGY 35
APPENDIX B—DOCUMENTATION LABELS FOR NEW ELEMENTS 37
APPENDIX C—LIST OF NEW CATEGORICAL ELEMENTS (PARAGRAPH 83) 49
APPENDIX D—ILLUSTRATED TAGGED EXAMPLES FOR CATEGORICAL ELEMENTS (PARAGRAPH 84) 68
© IFRS Foundation 3
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
Introduction
Why has the IFRS® Foundation changed the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy?
IN1 This IFRS Taxonomy Update includes changes to:
(a) the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy 2023 to reflect common reporting practice and general improvements
relating to information that entities commonly present or disclose in the financial statements; and
IN2 The Foundation has made changes to the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy:
(a) to respond to feedback on the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy from users and preparers of digital financial
reports; and
(b) to reflect the results of an empirical review of taxonomy elements (extensions) that entities created and
used in their filings.
IN4 Including common practice content in the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy reduces the need for entities to create
extensions. The content enables entities to tag their data more consistently with the tagging of other entities,
which makes it easier for users of digital financial reports to use and compare entities’ data.
IN5 This IFRS Taxonomy Update focuses on common reporting practice relating to financial instruments specifically
in the banking industry. The banking industry is focused on activities involving financial instruments. Therefore,
analysing common reporting practice in the banking industry is expected to contribute significantly to improving
elements for financial instruments in the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy.
IN6 The Foundation carried out a research project to review the extensions created by a sample of entities that apply
IFRS Accounting Standards and file their financial statements under US Securities and Exchange Commission,
European Securities and Markets Authority or UK Financial Conduct Authority requirements. When necessary,
the Foundation supplemented the sample with financial statements of entities in other jurisdictions. This data
provides a reasonable basis for identifying common reporting practice because it comes from entities in a variety
of jurisdictions.
IN7 For further details about IFRS Accounting Taxonomy common practice content and the criteria the Foundation
applies, please refer to Using the IFRS Taxonomy—Guide to Common Practice Content.1
(a) label changes to clarify the accounting meaning of an element. Such changes might help an entity find
the right element and avoid making tagging errors or creating unnecessary extensions.
(b) an enhanced data model to support more consistent tagging or to better reflect the presentation and
disclosure requirements of IFRS Accounting Standards in the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy.
© IFRS Foundation 4
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
characteristics such as how the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy content is organised into files and naming protocols.
The IFRS Accounting Taxonomy technology does not include the internal systems the Foundation uses to manage
and generate the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy files.
IN10 The changes set out in this document reflect developments in the wider industry technology that underlies or
relates to the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy. These changes are also necessary or beneficial to reflect developments
in standards and practices, and in the use of the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy or comparable taxonomies in various
regulatory environments.
IN11 The changes inform developers and maintainers of XBRL® software (such as XBRL processors, report creators or
review and consumption tools) about technology changes that might affect such software.
(a) common practice and general improvements—the IFRS Taxonomy Review Panel has reviewed, but is not
required to approve, the changes in this document for common practice and general improvements;2 and
(b) technology changes—the IFRS Taxonomy Consultative Group (ITCG) has assessed, but is not required to
approve, the changes detailed in this document that affect the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy technology.3
IN13 The changes to the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy technology might affect how preparers of digital financial reports
can implement the Taxonomy.
IN15 In this IFRS Taxonomy Update, changes to the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy elements are shown in tables. New
elements are shaded in green. Amended element labels or references are underlined to show added text and
struck through to show deleted text. Elements provided for context only (with no changes) use grey text. Indents
are used to show a taxonomy presentation parent–child relationship between IFRS Accounting Taxonomy
elements.
IN16 In the body of this document, the element label shown is the standard label, unless otherwise indicated.5
IN18 Documentation labels for new elements are included in Appendix B to this document. Changes to documentation
labels and new guidance labels are discussed throughout the document. The documentation and guidance labels
are also available as an additional linkbase in the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy files and as a separate spreadsheet.
XBRL properties
IN19 This document does not provide the full list of XBRL properties for the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy elements
listed. For further information on the XBRL properties applied to an element, please see the IFRS Accounting
Taxonomy files and associated documentation.
2 The IFRS Taxonomy Review Panel consists of at least three, but not more than five, members of the International Accounting Standards
Board. At least one senior member of the technical staff is also a member of this panel. For more details, please refer to the Due Process
Handbook, available at: https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/publications/pdf-standards/english/2023/issued/part-c/due-process-
handbook.pdf.
3 The IFRS Taxonomy Consultative Group (ITCG) operates under the general principles set out for consultative groups and has terms of
reference that set out its objectives and its workings. The technical staff consults the ITCG during the development of IFRS Accounting
Taxonomy changes. For more details, please refer to the Due Process Handbook.
4 The Guide to Understanding the IFRS Taxonomy Update is available at https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/standards/taxonomy/general-
resources/understanding-ifrs-taxonomy-update.pdf. Using the IFRS Taxonomy—A preparer’s guide is available at https://www.ifrs.org/
content/dam/ifrs/resources-for/preparers/xbrl-using-the-ifrs-taxonomy-a-preparers-guide-january-2019.pdf.
5 For more information on element labels, see Appendix A and the ‘Element labels’ section in Using the IFRS Taxonomy—A preparer’s guide.
© IFRS Foundation 5
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
© IFRS Foundation 6
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
This document uses several abbreviations. ‘ET’ refers to element type and ‘ER’ to element reference type. Element type ‘M’
refers to monetary, ‘T’ to text, ‘TB’ to text block, ‘B’ to Boolean, ‘EE’ to extensible enumeration (single choice) and ‘Set EE’ to
set-valued extensible enumeration (multiple choice). Reference type ‘D’ refers to disclosure, ‘E’ to example and ‘CP’ to
common practice. A short code appended to labels is used to refer to axes and members: ‘(A)’ refers to an axis and ‘(M)’ refers
to a member.
(a) the first phase focuses on commonly reported financial instrument concepts in some primary financial
statements and is reflected in this Taxonomy Update; and
(b) the second phase will focus on commonly reported financial instrument concepts disclosed in the notes
and will be reflected in a later update.
2 The Foundation has reviewed common practice for the statement of financial position (paragraphs 4–32) and the
statement of cash flows (paragraphs 33–64) because entities created the most financial instrument extensions for
these two statements.
3 The Foundation has not reviewed common practice for the statement of comprehensive income. It would not be
useful to develop elements based on common reporting practice because such practice might change when
IFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements is in effect. The Foundation might consider common
reporting practice in the statement of comprehensive income at a future date.
5 Paragraph 8 of IFRS 7 requires an entity to disclose the carrying amounts of each category of financial assets and
financial liabilities either in the statement of financial position or in the notes:
8 The carrying amounts of each of the following categories, as specified in IFRS 9, shall be disclosed either in
the statement of financial position or in the notes:
(a) financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss, showing separately (i) those designated
as such upon initial recognition or subsequently in accordance with paragraph 6.7.1 of IFRS 9; (ii)
those measured as such in accordance with the election in paragraph 3.3.5 of IFRS 9; (iii) those
measured as such in accordance with the election in paragraph 33A of IAS 32 and (iv) those
mandatorily measured at fair value through profit or loss in accordance with IFRS 9.
...
(e) financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss, showing separately (i) those designated as such
upon initial recognition or subsequently in accordance with paragraph 6.7.1 of IFRS 9 and (ii) those
that meet the definition of held for trading in IFRS 9.
(h) financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income, showing separately (i)
financial assets that are measured at fair value through other comprehensive income in accordance
with paragraph 4.1.2A of IFRS 9; and (ii) investments in equity instruments designated as such upon
initial recognition in accordance with paragraph 5.7.5 of IFRS 9.
© IFRS Foundation 7
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
6 The IFRS Accounting Taxonomy includes elements to reflect these disclosure requirements in the ‘[800100] Notes
– Subclassifications of assets, liabilities and equities’ Extended Link Role (ELR).6
(a) general classes of financial assets—for example, ‘equity instruments held’ and ‘debt instruments held’;
(b) specific classes of financial assets more commonly associated with banking entities—for example, ‘loans
and advances to banks’, ‘loans and advances to customers’, and ‘mandatory reserve deposits at central
banks’;
(c) general classes of financial liabilities—for example, ‘debt instruments issued’ and ‘subordinated
liabilities’; and
(d) specific classes of financial liabilities more commonly associated with banking entities—for example,
‘deposits from banks’, ‘deposits from customers’ and ‘liabilities due to central banks’.
(a) by category—including those measured at amortised cost, at fair value through profit or loss and at fair
value through other comprehensive income in accordance with IFRS 9 Financial Instruments;
(b) by class—including loans and advances, securities (paragraphs 13–17), debt instruments held, equity
instruments held and other financial assets; and
(c) by counterparty—including those with central banks, other credit institutions, businesses, customers and
government.
9 Banking entities often presented financial assets by category, then disaggregated these financial assets by specific
classes in that category. For example, entities would present a subtotal for ‘Financial assets measured at
amortised cost’. The entities would then present each of the material classes of financial assets—such as ‘Loans
and advances with customers at amortised cost’—as components of that subtotal.
10 Some combinations of shared characteristics were more commonly reported than others. For example, banking
entities commonly reported ‘Loans and advances to customers measured at amortised cost’ in the statement of
financial position; whereas banking entities rarely reported a narrower concept, ‘Loans and advances to corporate
entities measured at amortised cost’.
11 The IFRS Accounting Taxonomy includes few line-item elements that capture financial assets with more than one
characteristic. Consequently, many preparers created entity-specific line-item elements (extensions) to reflect the
presentation of these financial assets. The IFRS Accounting Taxonomy includes dimensions that reflect specific
characteristics of financial assets, such as their category or class. A few preparers used this dimensional
modelling approach, which would typically be used for financial instrument disclosures, to tag financial assets
with more than one characteristic presented in the statement of financial position, instead of creating line-item
extension elements.
12 The Foundation created new line-item elements to model only those concepts that reflect commonly reported
combinations of shared characteristics that describe financial assets. The Foundation did not use dimensional
modelling to reflect these concepts in the primary financial statements, because using a dimensional approach
would result in broken or incomplete calculations in the primary financial statements. A line-item modelling
approach is consistent with the modelling approach used elsewhere in the primary financial statements and
would allow for calculations to work throughout the statement of financial position.
6 An Extended Link Role groups similar or related concepts in a presentation group and provides a unique six-digit number and label for
that presentation group.
© IFRS Foundation 8
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
14 The IFRS Accounting Taxonomy includes common practice elements for ‘Debt instruments held’ and ‘Equity
instruments held’. However, banking entities still created extensions using the terminology ‘debt securities’ and
‘equity securities’.
15 Further analysis of the disaggregation of debt securities in the notes to the financial statements revealed that
entities often disaggregated debt securities into sub-classes, such as government bonds, corporate bonds, treasury
bills and other debt securities. Similarly, equity securities were disaggregated into ordinary shares and, in some
cases, preferred shares. Sometimes, these securities were disaggregated into listed and unlisted instruments.
There was insufficient evidence to suggest that debt securities are conceptually different to debt instruments or
that equity securities are conceptually different to equity instruments.
16 One possible explanation for using the terminology ‘securities’ could be that jurisdictional reporting practices or
templates use the terminology ‘securities’, which is then reflected in the extensions created by entities within
those jurisdictions.
17 One of the criteria for adding common practice elements to the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy is that the elements
are distinct from each other. The existing elements ‘Debt instruments held’ and ‘Equity instruments held’ can be
used to reflect the accounting concepts reported in the statement of financial position. Consequently, the
Foundation:
(a) created common practice elements using the terminology ‘debt instruments held’ and ‘equity instruments
held’ instead of ‘debt securities held’ and ‘equity securities held’ (paragraph 21); and
(b) updated the documentation label for the element ‘Debt instruments held’ and its related child elements,
and the documentation label for ‘Equity instruments held’, to clarify that the instruments referred to in
these documentation labels include instruments that might be called ‘securities’.
Improvements to the presentation structure of financial assets measured at fair value through
profit or loss
18 The IFRS Accounting Taxonomy includes ‘Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, classified as held for
trading’ and ‘Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, mandatorily measured at fair value’ in the same
level, as child elements of ‘Total financial assets at fair value through profit or loss’. However, financial assets
that are held for trading are a subset of those that are mandatorily measured at fair value.
(a) moved ‘Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, classified as held for trading’ to make it a child
element of ‘Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, mandatorily measured at fair value’; and
© IFRS Foundation 9
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
(b) created one new monetary element to reflect ‘Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss,
mandatorily measured at fair value other than those held for trading’.
(b) the resulting list of elements would be excessively long, would not be practical for preparers and users to
apply, and could affect their understanding of the Taxonomy.
21 Consequently, the Foundation added line-item elements for those commonly reported combinations of shared
characteristics that describe financial assets, and those elements that logically complete the presentation
structure in the Taxonomy:
continued...
© IFRS Foundation 10
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
22 Some banking entities presented financial assets by class in the statement of financial position, instead of by
category. In these cases, the entity would also disclose the breakdown of the categories of these classes of
financial assets in the notes to the financial statements and, sometimes, in the statement of financial position.
23 If an entity presented financial assets by class and then disaggregated these financial assets by category in the
statement of financial position, the entity could still use the common practice elements in paragraph 21 to reflect
the appropriate concepts presented in the statement of financial position. The elements would reflect the same
accounting concept, irrespective of whether the financial asset is presented by category and disaggregated by
class or presented by class and disaggregated by category (Table 1).
Table 1—Example of the same accounting concept presented by category then class and by class then
category
Digital representation
In both cases, the values CU100 for Entity A and CU200 for Entity B can be tagged with the same element:
‘Loans and advances to customers at amortised cost’
© IFRS Foundation 11
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
24 Some entities created extensions for concepts that already exist in the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy. Preparers are
encouraged to consider whether the existing elements in the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy appropriately reflect the
reported concept before creating extensions for those concepts:
(a) investments in equity instruments, designated at fair value through other comprehensive income—some examples of
extensions observed include ‘Equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income’ and
‘Equity share investments designated at FVOCI’. The IFRS Accounting Taxonomy already includes the
element ‘Investments in equity instruments designated at fair value through other comprehensive
income’, which can be used to represent this accounting concept.
(b) derivative financial assets—some examples of extensions observed include ‘Financial assets measured at fair
value through profit or loss held for trading, trading derivatives’ and ‘Financial assets at fair value
through profit or loss classified as held for non-trading, derivatives’. The IFRS Accounting Taxonomy
already includes elements for derivative financial assets (‘Derivative financial assets’), derivatives held for
trading (‘Derivative financial assets held for trading’) and derivatives held for hedging purposes
(‘Derivative financial assets held for hedging’).
26 The Foundation did not create elements that reflect the disaggregation of some classes of financial assets by
category (for example—‘Credit card loans’) because these extensions were rarely reported.
28 Paragraph 16A of IFRS 7 prohibits an entity from presenting the loss allowance separately in the statement of
financial position as a reduction of the carrying amount of a financial asset that is measured at fair value through
other comprehensive income. However, the Standard includes no such prohibition for financial assets measured
at amortised cost.
29 Accordingly, the Foundation added two elements for loans and advances measured at amortised cost—one for the
gross carrying amount and one for the allowance for expected credit losses—in addition to the element ‘Loans
and advances measured at amortised cost’. Additionally, the Foundation added a calculation relationship to
reflect that loans and advances measured at amortised cost are calculated as the gross carrying amount minus the
allowance for expected credit losses.
© IFRS Foundation 12
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
Calculation
Element label ET ER Reference relationship
Loans and advances at amortised cost M CP IAS 1.55 C=A−B
Loans and advances at amortised cost, gross carrying M CP IAS 1.55 A
amount
Loans and advances at amortised cost, allowance for M CP IAS 1.55 B
expected credit losses
(a) by category—including those measured at amortised cost, and at fair value through profit or loss in
accordance with IFRS 9;
(b) by class—including debt instruments issued, deposit liabilities, subordinated liabilities and other financial
liabilities; and
(c) by counterparty—including those with central banks, other credit institutions and customers.
31 Consequently, the Foundation added elements for those commonly reported combinations of shared
characteristics that describe financial liabilities, and those elements that logically complete the presentation
structure in the Taxonomy:
© IFRS Foundation 13
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
(a) the indirect method—profit or loss is adjusted for the effects of transactions of a non-cash nature, any
deferrals or accruals of past or future operating cash receipts or payments, and items of income or
expense associated with investing or financing cash flows (paragraphs 34–44); or
(b) the direct method—major classes of gross cash receipts and gross cash payments are disclosed (paragraphs
45–48).
35 Banking entities that presented cash flows from operating activities using the indirect method commonly
presented reconciling adjustments related to financial instruments, including:
(a) adjustments for impairment losses or a reversal of impairment losses on financial assets (paragraphs
36–38);
(b) adjustments for fair value gains or losses on financial assets or liabilities (paragraphs 39–41); and
(c) adjustments for the gains or losses recognised on disposal of financial assets (paragraphs 42–44).
36 The IFRS Accounting Taxonomy includes a common practice element for the adjustment of impairment losses or
reversal of impairment losses recognised in profit or loss for loans and advances. Paragraph 5.2.2 of IFRS 9
requires an entity to recognise impairment losses for all classes of financial assets measured at amortised cost or
financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income in accordance with paragraph 4.1.2A
of IFRS 9. Many banking entities in the sample presented a single adjustment for impairment losses or a reversal
of impairment losses on all financial assets in one line item.
37 The existing Taxonomy element ‘Adjustments for impairment loss (reversal of impairment loss) recognised in
profit or loss, loans and advances’ is too narrow to appropriately reflect this concept.7 The existing element is
only intended to reflect the adjustment for impairment losses on loans and advances. Instead of using this
element, preparers created extensions to reflect the adjustment for impairment losses on all financial assets.
38 Consequently, the Foundation created one, slightly broader, element to reflect the adjustment for impairment
losses or reversal of impairment losses on all financial assets recognised in profit or loss. This common practice
element could be used to tag the adjustment for impairment losses on all classes of financial assets measured at
amortised cost or financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income in accordance
with paragraph 4.1.2A of IFRS 9.
7 An element has a narrower accounting meaning if the element is limited in scope or meaning compared to the concept to be disclosed.
© IFRS Foundation 14
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
39 The IFRS Accounting Taxonomy includes common practice elements that reflect adjustments for fair value gains
or losses and adjustments for gains or losses on changes in the fair value of derivatives. However, the IFRS
Accounting Taxonomy includes no individual elements for the adjustment for gains or losses on financial assets
or the adjustment for gains or losses on financial liabilities. Banking entities commonly presented the
adjustments for fair value gains or losses on financial assets separately from adjustments for fair value gains or
losses on financial liabilities.
40 A few banking entities presented separate line items for adjustments for fair value gains or losses for various
categories of financial assets—for example, ‘financial assets at fair value through profit or loss’. However, these
extensions were rarely reported and, consequently, the Foundation did not create elements for these adjustments.
41 The Foundation created two common practice elements—one for adjustments to fair value gains or losses on
financial assets, and a second element for adjustments to fair value gains or losses on financial liabilities.
42 Banking entities commonly presented adjustments to gains or losses from the disposal of financial assets to
reconcile profit or loss to net cash flows from operating activities. The IFRS Accounting Taxonomy includes no
element for the adjustment for gains or losses resulting from the disposal of financial assets and, consequently,
preparers created extensions to reflect this concept.
43 Banking entities that presented the adjustment for the disposal of financial assets commonly did so in a single
line item. Although preparers created a range of varied extensions—for example, ‘Adjustments for (gain) loss on
sale of investment securities’ and ‘Adjustments for (gain) loss on disposals of other financial assets’—none of
these extensions were commonly observed. Instead, entities commonly included the adjustment to profit or loss
from the disposal of financial assets in a single line item.
44 Consequently, the Foundation created one common practice element to reflect the adjustments for gains or losses
on the disposal of all financial assets. If an entity presents an adjustment for the disposal of any financial asset in
a single line item, that entity would use the new element to tag that concept.
(b) interest paid and interest received, classified as operating activities (paragraph 47); and
© IFRS Foundation 15
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
46 Banking entities that presented cash flows from operating activities using the direct method reported cash
inflows and outflows arising from interest, fees and commission. When reporting ‘fees and commissions
received’, these preparers commonly used the existing element ‘Receipts from royalties, fees, commissions and
other revenue’. However, the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy includes no corresponding element for fees and
commissions paid. Consequently, the Foundation created a common practice element for ‘Payments relating to
royalties, fees and commissions’. This element can be used by entities that present royalties, fees and/or
commissions in the same line item.
47 The IFRS Accounting Taxonomy includes elements for interest paid and interest received, classified as operating
activities. However, some banking entities presented separate line items for interest received from various classes
of assets, such as loans and advances or debt securities. Similarly, some banking entities presented separate line
items for interest paid from deposit liabilities. Consequently, the Foundation added three common practice
elements to reflect:
48 Banking entities that present cash flows from operating activities using the direct method report cash inflows for
the recovery of loans that were previously written off as a separate line item. Although Illustrative Example B in
IAS 7 Statement of Cash Flows does include a line item for the recovery of loans previously written off, the IFRS
Accounting Taxonomy includes no element to reflect this concept. Accordingly, the Foundation added one
example element to reflect the cash inflow from the recovery of loans previously written off.
50 The IFRS Accounting Taxonomy includes common practice elements for adjustments to the carrying amount of
some operating assets more commonly associated with banking entities—for example, ‘Adjustments for decrease
(increase) in financial assets held for trading’, ‘Adjustments for decrease (increase) in loans and advances to
customers’ and ‘Adjustments for decrease (increase) in loans and advances to banks’.
© IFRS Foundation 16
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
51 Banking entities commonly presented adjustments for the increase or decrease in financial assets by category or
by class. A few banking entities presented adjustments for financial assets by combination of category and class—
for example, ‘Adjustments for decrease (increase) in loans and advances at amortised cost’. However, such
extensions were rarely observed.
52 A few banking entities presented adjustments for specific types of loans and advances—for example, adjustments
for the change in loans and advances to corporates, or adjustments for the change in residential mortgages.
However, these extensions were also rarely observed.
53 The IFRS Accounting Taxonomy includes no elements that reflect adjustments to financial assets that are held as
part of operating activities either by category or by class of financial assets. Consequently, the Foundation added
elements for commonly reported adjustments to the carrying amount of financial assets that are held as part of
operating activities, as well as further elements that logically complete the presentation structure in the
Taxonomy.
54 Banking entities commonly presented adjustments for the increase or decrease in financial liabilities by category
or by class, which is similar to their presentation of adjustments for the increase or decrease in financial assets
that are held as part of operating activities. A few banking entities presented adjustments for financial liabilities
by a combination of category and class—for example, ‘Adjustments for increase (decrease) in deposits and
borrowings at amortised cost’. However, such extensions were rarely observed.
55 A few banking entities presented adjustments for specific types of deposits—for example, adjustments for the
change in demand deposits, or adjustments for the change in deposits from central banks. However, these
extensions were also rarely observed.
56 The IFRS Accounting Taxonomy includes no elements that reflect adjustments to financial liabilities that are held
as part of operating activities either by category or by class of financial liabilities. Consequently, the Foundation
added elements for commonly reported adjustments to the carrying amount of financial liabilities that are held
as part of operating activities and elements that logically complete the presentation structure in the Taxonomy.
© IFRS Foundation 17
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
58 Because banking entities often present cash flows from the sale or purchase of financial assets for each category
of financial asset, preparers created extensions to represent cash inflows and outflows for each category of
financial asset.
59 In a few cases, banking entities presented cash inflows from the sale of financial assets and from the maturity of
financial assets separately and created separate extensions for these line items. However, this presentation was
rarely observed and preparers who create such extensions could anchor these extensions to the existing wider
common practice elements to provide further context for the extensions. Therefore, the Foundation did not
create separate elements for the proceeds from the sale of financial assets or for the proceeds from the maturity
of financial assets.
60 The Foundation created common practice elements to reflect the purchase and proceeds from sales or maturity of
financial assets for each category of financial asset.
© IFRS Foundation 18
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
62 Banking entities commonly presented cash flows relating to Additional Tier 1 (AT1) capital,8 such as the proceeds
from issuing AT1 capital and the repayments of AT1 capital. The IFRS Accounting Taxonomy includes no
elements specific to banking regulation, such as the Basel III Accords.
63 The Foundation added elements that reflect cash flows relating to regulatory capital in general, instead of
creating specific elements that reflect cash flows relating to AT1 capital. Preparers could use these elements to
tag concepts relating to AT1 capital and might also use these elements to tag concepts relating to other regulatory
capital, if applicable. The Foundation added common practice elements to reflect proceeds from the issue and
repayments of regulatory capital, arising from instruments separately classified as financial liabilities and equity
instruments.
64 The Foundation observed that banking entities commonly presented the repayments of interest on AT1 capital.
However, the Foundation did not create a common practice element for this concept because this reporting
practice might change when IFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements is in effect.
General improvements
65 The Foundation made several improvements to the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy, based on stakeholder feedback
and related work:
(b) introducing elements to capture a reconciliation of property, plant and equipment including right-of-use
assets (paragraphs 85–92);
(c) creating an element to tag the fair value of investment property measured at cost (paragraphs 93–98);
(d) removing restrictive text from the documentation labels of members of the ‘Types of antidilutive
instruments’ axis (paragraphs 99–101); and
(e) removing inaccurate formulas and improving documentation labels related to the ‘Continuing and
discontinued operations’ axis (paragraphs 102–124).
8 Additional Tier 1 (AT1) capital is the sum of capital instruments that meet the criteria of AT1 and related surplus, additional qualifying
minority interests and regulatory adjustments. AT1 capital and Common Equity Tier 1 (CET) capital comprise Tier 1 capital in terms of
the Basel III Accords.
© IFRS Foundation 19
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
(a) Boolean elements—these allow an entity to choose only ‘true’ or ‘false’ (‘yes’ or ‘no’) options (see Table 3);
and
(b) extensible enumerations—these allow an entity to choose an option from a list (and create an entity-
specific option(s) if needed), for example, whether investment in an associate is measured using the equity
method or at fair value (‘Equity method’ / ‘At fair value’). There are two variants of extensible
enumeration elements—set-valued extensible enumerations and single-valued extensible enumerations.
Set-valued extensible enumerations allow an entity to choose more than one option from a specified list,
whereas single-valued extensible enumerations allow an entity to choose only one option from a specified
list.11
9 The term ‘IFRS’ used in the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy element labels refers to the ‘IFRS Accounting Standards’. The element labels and
documentation labels that refer to ‘IFRS’ will be updated as part of a separate project.
10 The English translation of this note in German is ‘The Annual Report contains the audited consolidated financial statements, including
the notes therein that have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).’.
11 Note that the values of extensible enumerations are technically not ‘tagged’ in the same way in Inline XBRL. Extensible enumerations do
not use Inline XBRL transformations to derive the fact values from the human-readable text of the XHTML document, as would be the
approach for other kinds of elements. In practice, ‘hidden’ facts must be used for extensible enumerations. The Foundation intends to
update its guidance for filers to indicate that a mechanism to link the human-readable layer to the XBRL fact should be used for such
hidden facts (which is the current guidance for SEC or ESEF filers). The layer and fact should be linked via a style property with a name
ending ‘-ix-hidden’ and the value of the id attribute of the relevant fact in the ix:hidden section.
© IFRS Foundation 20
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
69 The Foundation introduced categorical elements in the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy to align the practice used in
both the accounting and sustainability disclosure taxonomies and to gain the benefits of categorical elements.
70 The Foundation used a similar approach to that used by the ISSB and created two types of categorical elements to
reflect narrative information that could be provided in a categorical format—Boolean elements and extensible
enumeration elements. Boolean element types are used when narrative disclosures can be appropriately
standardised as either ‘true’ or ‘false’. Extensible enumeration element types are used when narrative disclosures
can be appropriately reflected by a list of defined options for which:
(b) an exhaustive list of options is not provided in an IFRS Accounting Standard, but the examples provided in
the Standard are expected to cover most disclosures in practice.
(a) created a categorical element for disclosure of the nature of government’s relationship with the reporting
entity. This disclosure is suited to a categorical element because the list of options used to categorise this
relationship is provided with the disclosure requirement in paragraph 26(a) of IAS 24 Related Party
Transactions (‘control’, ‘joint control’ or ‘significant influence’).
(b) created a categorical element for disclosure of the depreciation method used for property, plant and
equipment because examples of depreciation methods provided in paragraph 62 of IAS 16 Property, Plant
and Equipment are expected to cover most disclosures in practice.
(c) did not create a categorical element for ‘Description of nature of benefits provided by plan’ because the
disclosure requirement in paragraph 139(a)(i) of IAS 19 Employee Benefits includes neither a complete list of
options nor a comprehensive list of examples.
72 The Foundation created extensible enumeration elements for requirements in IFRS Accounting Standards that
omit a complete list of options but include a list of examples that is expected to cover most responses. The
Foundation did not include an ‘other’ option in the list of values for the extensible enumeration elements.
Therefore, the Foundation suggests that if an entity’s disclosure does not match any of the available options, then
the entity should create an extension element to use as the value for the categorical element.12
73 For example, for the element ‘Depreciation method, property, plant and equipment, categorical’, the Foundation
provided the options ‘straight-line method’, ‘diminishing balance method’ and ‘units of production method’,
which are examples mentioned in paragraph 62 of IAS 16. However, an entity might use another method to
allocate the depreciable amount of any class of property, plant and equipment (for example, the double declining
balance method). If so, the entity should create an extension member (for example, ‘Double declining balance
method’) as a possible value for the element ‘Depreciation method, property, plant and equipment, categorical’
and use that in its digital financial reports.
74 Note that categorical elements, like other elements in the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy, can be used more than one
time to convey more than one fact when combined with appropriate axes. For example, the element
‘Depreciation method, property, plant and equipment, categorical’ can be used with the ‘Buildings’ and ‘Vehicles’
members under the ‘Classes of property, plant and equipment’ axis to separately indicate the depreciation
method used for buildings and vehicles, if necessary. However, there is one categorical element, ‘Inventory cost
formulas, categorical’, for which there is no appropriate axis and which may be used with more than one option
(for example, if costs are allocated to some inventories using the weighted average cost method and are allocated
to other inventories using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method). Therefore, the Foundation has created this
categorical element as a ‘set-valued extensible enumeration’ element, so preparers can use this element with
more than one option, if needed.
75 The Foundation did not create categorical elements for disclosure requirements in IAS 26 Accounting and Reporting
by Retirement Benefit Plans. A limited number of entities apply this Standard; therefore, the benefits of changing the
Taxonomy to reflect those requirements would be similarly limited.
12 XBRL extensible enumerations are, as their name suggests, ‘extensible’ by filers or jurisdictions, in the sense that additional response
options can be defined.
© IFRS Foundation 21
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
77 Narrative elements provide preparers with the flexibility to tag additional explanations. Such additional
explanations often provide more context around the disclosure requirement and can have significant value.
Therefore, the Foundation retained the existing narrative elements in the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy and created
additional categorical elements as child elements of such narrative elements. The approach will:
(a) allow preparers to tag additional contextual information (using the parent narrative element); and
(b) capture the fundamental information in a categorical format to simplify analysis and screening (using the
child categorical element).
The Foundation retained such narrative elements because users of digital financial reports are expected to search
for, analyse and use such information separately from other information in order to understand the context of
the categorical element.
78 Existing narrative elements related to potential categorical elements could fall into one of two types—those that
are narrow enough, and those that are excessively broad, meaning that:
(a) a narrative element is narrow enough if it was created for the topic of a categorical disclosure and is
meant to capture that specific information only, or if its focus is narrow enough that users should be able
to easily identify relevant context for the categorical disclosure in the content. The Foundation created
categorical elements as child elements of this type of narrow narrative element. For example:
(b) a narrative element is excessively broad if it captures a categorical disclosure but also covers too many
other disclosures. Therefore, it would be difficult for users to understand any nuances around the separate
categorical disclosure, which might be difficult to identify within the broader disclosure. In these cases,
the Foundation created two additional elements as child elements of this type of broad narrative element:
(1) a narrow narrative element and (2) a categorical element. For example:
© IFRS Foundation 22
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
80 Therefore, the Foundation plans to introduce guidance about using categorical elements and the related narrative
elements to help entities consistently adopt these new elements. The Foundation encourages entities to use the
parent narrative elements with the categorical elements to capture the full disclosure provided. The Foundation
has also included guidance labels for the categorical elements, stating: ‘When using this element to communicate
information that meets the disclosure requirement, the entity should also use the parent narrative element to
capture the related narrative disclosure if provided in the financial statements.’.
(a) introduced two types of categorical elements: ‘Boolean’ and ‘extensible enumeration’.
(b) defined member elements for the extensible enumeration elements. These member elements will
correspond to the options or examples in an Accounting Standard. If a Standard omits a complete list of
options but includes a set of examples, the Foundation did not include an item representing ‘other’.
Instead, entities are expected to create entity-specific items to be used as a value for the extensible
enumeration element for their entity-specific response.
(c) introduced categorical elements in addition to the existing narrative elements rather than as a
replacement for those narrative elements. This approach is intended to help preparers capture both the
categorical data and any related contextual information.
(d) plans to provide guidance in the guides and provided guidance in the taxonomy files to help preparers
consistently use two elements (the narrative element and the categorical element) for one disclosure
requirement.
(a) compliance—these elements relate to an entity disclosing compliance with IFRS Accounting Standards or a
specific topic or section in an Accounting Standard. For example, ‘Financial statements comply with IFRSs’
(True / False).
(b) exemption—these elements relate to an entity disclosing the application of an exemption or exception
provided in an Accounting Standard. For example, ‘Entity applies exemption in IAS 24.25’ (True / False).
(c) impracticability—these elements relate to an entity disclosing when something is impracticable. For
example, ‘Estimating amount of change in accounting estimate is impracticable’ (True / False).
(d) measurement method—these elements relate to an entity disclosing which of the measurement methods
provided in the Accounting Standard the entity has used. For example, ‘Investment in associate is
measured using equity method or at fair value’ (Equity method / Fair value).
(e) choice of accounting policy—these elements relate to requirements for an entity to disclose its choice of
accounting policy. For example, ‘Inventory cost formulas, categorical’ (First-in, first-out / Weighted
average).
(f) accounting estimates—these elements relate to requirements for an entity to disclose an accounting
estimate. For example, ‘Depreciation method, property, plant and equipment, categorical’ (Straight-line
method / Diminishing balance method / Units of production method).
(g) governance—these elements relate to an entity disclosing information about governance required by IFRS
Accounting Standards. For example, ‘Independent valuer was involved in revaluation, property, plant and
equipment’ (True / False).
(h) transition—these elements relate to the disclosure requirements in the transition sections of IFRS
Accounting Standards. For example, ‘Change in accounting policy is made in accordance with transitional
provisions of initially applied IFRS’ (True / False).
(i) others—all other categorical elements that do not fall into any of the categories in (a)–(h). For example,
‘Shares have no par value’ (True / False).
83 The full list of categorical elements, along with related narrative elements, is provided in Appendix C.
© IFRS Foundation 23
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
86 The Foundation subsequently researched common reporting practice for the corresponding reconciliation of
changes in ‘Property, plant and equipment including right-of-use assets’ and observed variety in entities’
reporting patterns, in that:
(a) some entities disclosed separate reconciliation tables for ‘Property, plant and equipment’ and ‘Right-of-use
assets’;
(b) some entities combined the details of ‘Property, plant and equipment’ and ‘Right-of-use assets’ into a
single table with separate columns for owned property, plant and equipment, and for right-of-use assets;
and
(c) other entities also disclosed a single table, but with columns for an aggregate of ‘Property, plant and
equipment including right-of-use assets’ and the ‘Right-of-use assets’ component of ‘Property, plant and
equipment including right-of-use assets’.
87 The Foundation enabled tagging of various types of reporting patterns (in particular, those described in
paragraph 86(b)–(c), in which only a single table is disclosed that combines the reconciliation of ‘Property, plant
and equipment’ and ‘Right-of-use assets’ in some way). This tagging was enabled by creating a new table for the
reconciliation of ‘Property, plant and equipment including right-of-use assets’ in the presentation group ‘[822100]
Notes – Property, plant and equipment’. This new table has line items similar to the reconciliation elements
provided for ‘Property, plant and equipment’ and the same set of axes, with an additional axis, ‘Property, plant
and equipment including right-of-use assets [axis]’, which contains members for ‘Property, plant and equipment’,
‘Right-of-use assets’ and ‘Property, plant and equipment including right-of-use assets’.
Line items
continued...
© IFRS Foundation 24
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
© IFRS Foundation 25
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
89 The IFRS Accounting Taxonomy has elements for quantitative information about changes in the carrying amount
of right-of-use assets (for example, ‘Depreciation, right-of-use assets’ and ‘Additions to right-of-use assets’).
However, no relationship is indicated between those elements, they are not presented in the Taxonomy in a
reconciliation format, and too few elements are provided to convey a full reconciliation.
90 Consequently, the Foundation added an existing axis and new elements to the table ‘Disclosure of quantitative
information about right-of-use assets [table]’ in the presentation group ‘[832610] Notes – Leases’ to enable
preparers to tag the reconciliation of right-of-use assets. The Foundation sampled 47 entities who presented right-
of-use assets in their statement of financial position to identify commonly reported line items in the
reconciliation of right-of-use assets. The Foundation created elements for commonly reported line items for the
reconciliation, with labels parallel to the equivalent elements in the reconciliation of ‘property, plant and
equipment’. The Foundation did not change the existing set of elements related to providing quantitative
information about right-of-use assets but will also include these elements in the new reconciliation table.
Therefore, it will be unnecessary for entities to change their tagging if they provide no reconciliation of right-of-
use assets.
Line items
continued...
© IFRS Foundation 26
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
91 In the Foundation’s view, introducing two reconciliation tables—one for ‘property, plant and equipment
including right-of-use assets’ and another one for ‘right-of-use assets’—could enable the tagging of various types
of reporting patterns, as discussed in paragraph 86.
92 The IFRS Accounting Taxonomy includes similar modelling for intangible assets and goodwill. Specifically, there
are separate reconciliations, with similar line items, for:
© IFRS Foundation 27
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
Measurement at recognition
20 An owned investment property shall be measured initially at its cost. Transaction costs shall be included in
the initial measurement.
...
30 With the exception noted in paragraph 32A, an entity shall choose as its accounting policy either the fair value
model in paragraphs 33–55 or the cost model in paragraph 56 and shall apply that policy to all of its
investment property.
94 Paragraph 79(e) of IAS 40 requires an entity to disclose the fair value of investment property when the entity
applies the cost model to measure the investment property.
79 In addition to the disclosures required by paragraph 75, an entity that applies the cost model in paragraph 56
shall disclose:
...
...
96 The element ‘Investment property’ can be used to tag the presented amount of investment property, whether
presented at cost or fair value. In the sample of entities that the Foundation reviewed, most entities presented the
amount of investment property at fair value and a few entities applied the cost model. The Taxonomy includes no
specific element to tag the disclosure of the fair value of the investment property when an entity applies the cost
model as required by paragraph 79(e) of IAS 40.
97 The lack of a specific element in the Taxonomy led to entities using inconsistent tagging practices, which makes
it difficult for users of digital financial reports to use the data:
(a) some entities created extensions to tag the disclosure of the fair value of investment property.
(b) some entities used elements with similar meanings, from other presentation groups. These entities used
the combination of the line item ‘Investment property’ with the ‘Not measured at fair value in statement
of financial position but for which fair value is disclosed’ member under the ‘Measurement’ axis.
© IFRS Foundation 28
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
98 The Foundation created a new monetary element in the presentation group ‘[825100] Notes – Investment
property’.
100 The documentation labels of these members start with the words ‘This member stands for a class of antidilutive
instrument representing …’.
101 Feedback suggests that the documentation labels of these members restrict the members from being used in
other places in the Taxonomy where they might be useful—for example, with the ‘Types of share-based payment
arrangements’ axis. Restricting the use of these member elements to one place only would have no particular
benefit. Therefore, the Foundation changed the documentation labels of these members to delete the reference to
antidilutive instruments.
103 Because of the effect of default members in XBRL, the concept of the member ‘Continuing operations’ implies
that all reported facts that do not specify a different value for this axis are, at least notionally, for ‘Continuing
operations’.
© IFRS Foundation 29
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
104 This implication often does not completely fit that reporting reality. Logical issues also arise when preparers
consider elements, such as ‘Profit (loss) from discontinued operations’, which intrinsically relate to something
other than continuing operations.
105 The Foundation chose the current pattern for the ‘Continuing and discontinued operations’ axis (rather than
having the aggregate of continuing and discontinued operations as the default, for example) because most items
in primary financial statements are typically reported for continuing operations. Therefore, having continuing
operations as the default avoids requiring or accidentally encouraging entities to use the axis for both continuing
and discontinued operations for continuing operations.
106 The intention was for the axis to be considered ‘overridden’ by the nature of the few elements, such as ‘Profit
(loss)’, which are typically provided in the primary financial statements as an aggregate of continuing and
discontinued operations.
107 Unfortunately, a few formulas were included in the formulas accompanying the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy that
erroneously indicate that some elements that specifically relate to continuing operations are equivalent to other
elements that are also intended to capture discontinued operations. Furthermore, the labelling of some of those
elements leaves it unclear that they are intended to also include discontinued operations.
(a) improved the labelling of the default member to clarify that it effectively means ‘unless overridden by the
nature of the concept’;
(b) changed the documentation labels to indicate additional elements assumed by default to be other than
continuing operations (that is, elements that override this axis); and
(c) removed from the formulas accompanying the Taxonomy any formulas that imply equivalence between
elements (for example, ‘Cash flows from (used in) operating activities, continuing operations’ being
assumed to be equal to ‘Cash flows from (used in) operating activities’ because of the default of
‘Continuing operations’).
© IFRS Foundation 30
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
Calculation 1.1
109 The XBRL v2.1 specification allows the definition of simple calculation relationships between reporting concepts
(‘summation-item’ links). The IFRS Accounting Taxonomy contains many examples of such relationships.
110 However, the specification has significant flaws, in particular the treatment of duplicate values and application to
rounded values.
111 The ‘Calculations 1.1’ specification reached Recommendation status on 22 February 2023 and provides minor,
incremental improvements to the XBRL v2.1 ‘summation-item’ mechanism, resulting in improved treatment of
rounded and duplicate facts.13,14
112 Adapting the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy to ‘Calculations 1.1’ is straightforward, involving simply replacing all
existing uses of the arcrole ‘http://www.xbrl.org/2003/arcrole/summation-item’ with uses of the arcrole ‘https://
xbrl.org/2023/arcrole/summation-item’, and adding a reference to the schema at ‘https://www.xbrl.org/2023/
calculation-1.1.xsd’.
113 Software that checks data against, interprets or displays calculation relationships in the IFRS Accounting
Taxonomy will require updating to conform to the ‘Calculation 1.1’ specification.
114 Consequently, this change is expected to reduce false calculation errors identified by validation software, to
ensure checks are applied even if duplicate values are used, and to identify any inconsistent duplicate values to
preparers. Duplicate values occur if two mutually incompatible values are reported for a single item.
116 Default values are a technical mechanism to simplify the intersection between items reported using an axis and
those reported without using an axis. In particular, default values ensure that a figure reported as a simple line
item in a primary financial statement and also reported as the ‘total’ figure in a breakdown of that item by some
aspect in the notes can be tagged identically (for example, property, plant and equipment and a breakdown of
that by class of asset in the notes). These two figures can be tagged identically without requiring the same fact to
be represented in two different ways while the dimensional relationship to the breakdown figures remains clear.
117 Therefore, the default value is typically used both for the ‘total’ figure of the breakdown and for a figure shown
without a breakdown in the primary financial statements (because these figures are typically identical, being
conceptually the same fact).
13 See https://specifications.xbrl.org/work-product-index-calculations-2-calculations-1-1.html.
14 Specifications reach ‘Recommendation status’ after gathering sufficient implementation and deployment experience, and no additional
development of the specification is necessary, and, after re-issuance of the specification, no further issues are identified with the
specification. Recommendations are stable and will only be updated with errata corrections for defects uncovered in the drafting.
© IFRS Foundation 31
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
118 However, in other cases, the typical ‘total’ for the breakdown might not be equivalent to the figure shown in the
primary financial statements if the axis is not used. This lack of equivalency would affect an entity’s disclosure if
the axis is used to indicate a particular subset of the scope of that disclosure. In such cases, the axis will typically
have a default member broadly indicating that the axis is not applicable, and a first child of that default member
that is intended to represent the sum of all possible specific entries on the axis. For example, the ‘Associates’ axis
has a default member ‘Entity’s total for associates’, which will technically be associated with any concept to
which the axis is not applied. The axis has a member below this default member called ‘Associates’ which is
intended to represent the sum of all associates, with preparers being expected to add entity-specific entries for
specific associates beneath this member.
Element label
Associates (A)
Entity’s total for associates (M)
Associates (M)
119 In most cases, axis default values are best thought of conceptually as conveying ‘not applicable’ rather than
conveying a default value, and in many cases, ‘not applicable’ might also be considered equivalent to ‘all’.
120 The naming of the default members for explicit dimensions in the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy lacks a specific
pattern. These members can only be identified after inspecting the top level of the axis and the related members’
hierarchical structure found in dimension linkbases, or equivalently in the presentation group ‘[990000] Axis -
Defaults’. Examples of the various patterns used in naming default members include:
Element label
Accounting estimates (A)
Accounting estimates (M)
Agricultural produce by group (A)
Agricultural produce, group (M)
Attribution of expenses by nature to their function (A)
Line items by function (M)
Categories of financial assets (A)
Financial assets, category (M)
Classes of assets (A)
Assets (M)
Components of equity (A)
Equity (M)
Continuing involvement in derecognised financial assets by type of instrument (A)
Types of instrument (M)
Fair value as deemed cost (A)
Aggregate of fair values (M)
Levels of fair value hierarchy (A)
All levels of fair value hierarchy (M)
Major customers (A)
Customers (M)
Maturity (A)
Aggregated time bands (M)
Measurement (A)
Aggregated measurement (M)
Reserves within equity (A)
continued...
© IFRS Foundation 32
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
Element label
Other reserves (M)
Types of antidilutive instruments (A)
Antidilutive instruments (M)
Types of financial assets (A)
Financial assets, type (M)
Types of interest rates (A)
Interest rate types (M)
121 It is frequently unclear to preparers whether these default members are meant to convey information about
items that do not specify a different value, are meant to represent a total figure for a breakdown or are purely
‘non-informational’ values (representing ‘not applicable’ or similar). Non-informational default elements simply
convey that the axis breakdown is not applicable to a fact.
122 The Foundation simplified the identification of non-informational default elements by replacing them with
elements labelled to match the axis but with the suffix ‘[domain]’ instead of ‘[axis]’.15
123 This approach will clearly distinguish non-informational defaults from ‘informational’ defaults. Informational
defaults exist on some axes, where they indicate that all reported data items should be assumed to have that
characteristic unless otherwise indicated. These informational defaults are:
Element label
Assets and liabilities classified as held for sale (A)
Assets and liabilities not classified as held for sale (M)
Carrying amount, accumulated depreciation, amortisation and impairment and gross carrying amount (A)
Carrying amount (M)
Consolidated and separate financial statements (A)
Consolidated (M)
Continuing and discontinued operations (A)
Continuing operations (M)
Creation date (A)
Default financial statements date (M)
Cumulative effect at date of initial application (A)
Opening balance before adjustment, cumulative effect at date of initial application (M)
Currency in which information is displayed (A)
Functional or presentation currency (M)
Departure from requirements of IFRS (A)
Currently stated (M)
Effect of adjustments made when entity changed basis of disaggregation of insurance finance income (expenses)
between profit or loss and other comprehensive income for contracts with direct participation features (A)
Currently stated (M)
Redesignation (A)
Redesignated (M)
Retrospective application and retrospective restatement (A)
Currently stated (M)
15 This is the approach currently taken by the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s US GAAP Taxonomy. This approach is illustrated in
the accompanying illustrative IFRS Accounting Taxonomy files.
© IFRS Foundation 33
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
124 If elements were used both as non-informational defaults for one axis and as non-default elements elsewhere, the
Foundation retained those elements in their existing form in the locations where they were non-default members
and created new elements to be used as the default members. For example, the ‘Ordinary shares’ member is used
as a meaningful concept in the ‘Classes of share capital’ axis, where it represents one type of share capital as
opposed to any other. However, it is also used as the non-informational default member of the ‘Classes of
ordinary shares’ axis, where logically it cannot have the same meaning, because not all facts associated with that
axis relate to ordinary shares. Members used in this manner are:
Element label
Intangible assets other than goodwill (M)
Investment property (M)
Investments in equity instruments designated at fair value through other comprehensive income (M)
Ordinary shares (M)
Other reserves (M)
Property, plant and equipment (M)
© IFRS Foundation 34
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
© IFRS Foundation 35
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
The IFRS Accounting Taxonomy uses the presentation The IFRS Accounting Taxonomy has specific presentation
linkbase to provide presentation views under which the line elements:
items, axes and members (or a combination of these
• headings (abstract elements); and
elements as tables) have been grouped. These presentation
views enable human-readable viewing and navigation of the • presentation groups.
IFRS Accounting Taxonomy.
These elements are not used when tagging financial
statements. These headings and presentation groups also
have standard labels.
The IFRS Accounting Taxonomy uses the definition linkbase For example, the content includes:
to provide views under which the combined line items, axes
• a definition for each table; and
and members (tables) have been grouped. These views
enable the computer-readable use of the IFRS Accounting • a default member for each axis.
Taxonomy.
© IFRS Foundation 36
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
continued...
© IFRS Foundation 37
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
continued...
© IFRS Foundation 38
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
continued...
© IFRS Foundation 39
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
© IFRS Foundation 40
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
Cash flows from operating activities—Changes in operating assets and liabilities (paragraphs 49–56)
continued...
© IFRS Foundation 41
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
continued...
© IFRS Foundation 42
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
continued...
© IFRS Foundation 43
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
Reconciliation of property, plant and equipment including right-of-use assets (paragraphs 85–92)
continued...
© IFRS Foundation 44
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
continued...
© IFRS Foundation 45
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
continued...
© IFRS Foundation 46
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
© IFRS Foundation 47
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
© IFRS Foundation 48
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
continued...
© IFRS Foundation 49
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
continued...
© IFRS Foundation 50
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
Exemption: These elements relate to an entity disclosing the application of an exemption or exception provided in an
Accounting Standard.
continued...
© IFRS Foundation 51
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
continued...
© IFRS Foundation 52
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
continued...
© IFRS Foundation 53
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
continued...
© IFRS Foundation 54
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
continued...
© IFRS Foundation 55
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
continued...
16 In the Foundation’s review of categorical elements, it observed that this element has two references for two different disclosure require-
ments. In the Foundation’s view, there should be separate elements for the requirements in paragraphs 32 and 33 of IFRS 8 Operating
Segments. Therefore, the Foundation deleted the reference to paragraph 33 of IFRS 8 here and created an additional text and Boolean
element for that paragraph.
© IFRS Foundation 56
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
Measurement method: These elements relate to an entity disclosing which of the measurement methods provided in an
Accounting Standard the entity has used.
continued...
© IFRS Foundation 57
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
continued...
17 A few existing elements are labelled in such a way that the most natural label for the related categorical element would be the same. In
those few cases, the Foundation appended ‘categorical’ to the label of the categorical element.
© IFRS Foundation 58
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
Accounting policy: These elements relate to requirements for an entity to disclose its choice of accounting policy.
continued...
© IFRS Foundation 59
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
Accounting estimate: These elements relate to requirements for an entity to disclose an accounting estimate.
continued...
18 A few existing elements are named in such a way that the most natural name for the related categorical element would be the same. In
those few cases, the Foundation appended ‘categorical’ to the name of the categorical element.
© IFRS Foundation 60
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
Governance: These elements relate to an entity disclosing information about governance required by IFRS Accounting
Standards.
continued...
19 A few existing elements are labelled in such a way that the most natural label for the related categorical element would be the same. In
those few cases, the Foundation appended ‘categorical’ to the label of the categorical element.
© IFRS Foundation 61
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
Transition: These elements relate to the disclosure requirements in the transition sections of IFRS Accounting Standards.
continued...
© IFRS Foundation 62
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
Other: All other categorical elements that do not fall into any of the other categories.
continued...
© IFRS Foundation 63
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
continued...
© IFRS Foundation 64
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
continued...
© IFRS Foundation 65
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
continued...
© IFRS Foundation 66
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
...continued
© IFRS Foundation 67
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
Inventories
Inventories comprising traded hardware and software are measured at the lower of cost (determined using first-in, first-out
method) and net realisable value. Cost comprises cost of purchase and all directly attributable costs incurred in bringing the
inventories to their present location and condition. Net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course
of business, minus the estimated costs of completion and selling expenses.
Example 2
Depreciation
Depreciation is recognised in the statement of financial performance on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives
of each part of an item of property, plant and equipment, with the residual value considered to be zero. Depreciation on
contract-specific assets is charged co-terminus over the contract period. Management’s estimated useful lives for the year
ended 31 March 2023 and 31 March 2022 were: …
Example 3
Statement of compliance
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the group have been prepared in accordance with IFRS Accounting
Standards and interpretations of those Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).
These consolidated financial statements have been approved for issue by the board of directors on 18 June 2023.
Example 4
Some new Standards, amendments to Standards and interpretations of Standards are not yet effective for annual periods
beginning after 1 April 2022 and have not been applied in preparing these consolidated financial statements. New Standards,
amendments to Standards and interpretations of Standards that could have a potential effect on the consolidated financial
statements of the company are:
On 7 May 2021, the IASB amended IAS 12 Income Taxes and published Deferred Tax related to Assets and Liabilities arising from a
Single Transaction (Amendments to IAS 12) that clarify …
© IFRS Foundation 68
IFRS ACCOUNTING TAXONOMY 2023—UPDATE 2 COMMON PRACTICE FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
© IFRS Foundation 69