0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views3 pages

Lecture 7 Notes

Uploaded by

bna64692
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views3 pages

Lecture 7 Notes

Uploaded by

bna64692
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

18.

745 Introduction to Lie Algebras September 30, 2010

Lecture 7 - Zariski Topology and Regular Elements


Prof. Victor Kac Scribe: Daniel Ketover

Definition 7.1. A topological space is a set 𝑋 with a collection of subsets 𝐹 (the closed sets)
satisfying the following axioms:

1) 𝑋 ∈ 𝐹 and ∅ ∈ 𝐹

2) The union of a finite collection of closed sets is closed

3) The intersection of arbitrary collection of closed sets is closed

4) (weak separation axiom) For any two points 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 there exists an 𝑆 ∈ 𝐹 such that 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆
but 𝑦 ∕∈ 𝑆

A subset 𝑂 ⊂ 𝑋 which is the complement in 𝑋 of a set in 𝐹 is called open. The axioms for a
topological space can also be phrased in terms of open sets.

Definition 7.2. Let X = 𝔽𝑛 where 𝔽 is a field. We define the Zariski topology on 𝑋 as follows. A
set in 𝑋 is closed if and only if if is the set of common zeroes of a collection (possibly infinite) of
polynomials 𝑃𝛼 (𝑥) on 𝔽𝑛

Exercise 7.1. Prove that the Zariski topology is indeed a topology.

Proof. We check the axioms. For 1), let 𝑝(𝑥) = 1, so that 𝕍(𝑝) = ∅, so ∅ ∈ 𝐹 . If 𝑝(𝑥) = 0, then
𝕍(𝑝) = 𝔽𝑛 , so 𝔽𝑛 ∈ 𝐹 . For 2), first take two closed sets 𝕍(𝑝𝛼 ) with 𝛼 ∈ 𝐼 and 𝕍(𝑞𝛽 ) with 𝛽 ∈ 𝐽 ,
and consider the family of polynomials 𝑓𝛼𝛽 = {𝑝𝛼 𝑞𝛽 ∣ 𝛼 ∈ 𝐼, 𝛽 ∈ 𝐽}. Then 𝕍(𝑓𝛼𝛽 ) = 𝕍(𝑝𝛼 ) ∪ 𝕍(𝑞𝛽 ).
Therefore 𝕍(𝑝𝛼 ) ∪ 𝕍(𝑞𝛽 ) is closed. This can be iterated for any n-fold union. For 3) closure
under arbitrary intersections is obvious. For 4), suppose 𝑥 ∕= 𝑦 ∈ 𝔽𝑛 and 𝑥 = (𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , ..., 𝑥𝑛 ). Set
𝑋 = 𝕍(𝑝1 , 𝑝2 , ..., 𝑝𝑛 ) where 𝑝𝑖 (𝑧) = 𝑧𝑖 − 𝑥𝑖 . So 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 but y is not.

Example 7.1. If 𝑋 = 𝔽 the closed sets in the Zariski topology are precisely the ∅, 𝔽 and finite
subsets of 𝔽.

Notation 7.1. Given a collection of polynomials 𝑆 on 𝔽𝑛 we denote by 𝕍(𝑆) ∈ 𝔽𝑛 the set of


common zeroes of all polynomials in 𝑆. By definition, 𝕍(𝑆) are all closed subsets in 𝔽𝑛 in the Zariski
topology. If 𝑆 contains precisely one non-constant polynomial, then 𝕍(𝑆) is called a hypersurface.

Proposition 7.1. Suppose the field 𝔽 is infinite and 𝑛 ≥ 1 then

1) The complement to a hypersurface in 𝔽𝑛 is an infinite set. Consequently, the complement of


𝕍(𝑆), where 𝑆 contains a nonzero polynomial, is an infinite set.

2) Every two non-empty Zariski open subsets of 𝔽𝑛 have a nonempty intersection

3) If a polynomial 𝑝(𝑥) vanishes on a nonempty Zariski open set then it is identically zero.

1
Example 7.2. The condition that 𝔽 be infinite is crucial. In 3), for instance, the polynomial
𝑝(𝑥) = 𝑥2 + 𝑥 on 𝔽2 vanishes at 1 and 0 but is not the zero polynomial.

Proof. For 1), We induct on 𝑛. When 𝑛 = 1, since any nonzero polynomial has at most deg
𝑃 roots, the complement of this set is infinite (since 𝔽 is). If 𝑛 ≥ 1 then any nonzero polyno-
mial 𝑝(𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , ..., 𝑥𝑛 ) can be written as a polynomial in one variable with coefficients polynomi-
als in the other variables. So we can write 𝑝(𝑥) = 𝑝𝑑 (𝑥2 , 𝑥3 , ..., 𝑥𝑛 )𝑥𝑑1 + 𝑝𝑑−1 (𝑥2 , 𝑥3 , ...𝑥𝑛 )𝑥𝑑−1 1 +
... + 𝑝0 (𝑥2 , 𝑥3 , ..., 𝑥𝑛 ) where 𝑝𝑑 (𝑥2 , 𝑥3 , ...𝑥𝑛 ) is a nonzero polynomial. By the inductive hypothesis,
we can find 𝑥𝑜2 , 𝑥𝑜3 , ..., 𝑥𝑜𝑛 ∈ 𝔽 such that 𝑝𝑑 (𝑥𝑜2 , 𝑥𝑜3 , ..., 𝑥𝑜𝑛 ) ∕= 0 Now fixing these values, 𝑝(𝑥) =
𝑝𝑑 (𝑥𝑜2 , 𝑥𝑜3 , ..., 𝑥𝑜𝑛 )𝑥𝑑1 + 𝑝𝑑−1 (𝑥𝑜2 , 𝑥𝑜3 , ...𝑥𝑜𝑛 )𝑥𝑑−1
1 + ... + 𝑝0 (𝑥𝑜2 , 𝑥𝑜3 , ..., 𝑥𝑜𝑛 ) we are back in the 𝑛 = 1
case. We can find an infinite number of values 𝑥𝑜1 such that 𝑝(𝑥) = 𝑝𝑑 (𝑥𝑜2 , 𝑥𝑜3 , ..., 𝑥𝑜𝑛 )(𝑥𝑜1 )𝑑 +
𝑝𝑑−1 (𝑥𝑜2 , 𝑥𝑜3 , ...𝑥𝑜𝑛 )(𝑥𝑜1 )𝑑−1 + ... + 𝑝0 (𝑥𝑜2 , 𝑥𝑜3 , ..., 𝑥𝑜𝑛 ) ∕= 0. Thus we have found an infinite number
of points in 𝔽𝑛 where 𝑝 does not vanish. To prove the second claim of 1), just observe if 𝑆 a
collection of polynomials containing the nonzero polynomial 𝑝(𝑥), we have 𝕍(𝑆)𝐶 ⊃ 𝕍(𝑝)𝐶 so by
the first claim, we have that 𝕍(𝑆)𝐶 contains an infinite set.
2) Consider 𝕍(𝑆1 ) and 𝕍(𝑆2 ) where 𝑆1 and 𝑆2 are nonzero sets of polynomials. It suffices to prove
that 𝕍(𝑝1 )𝐶 ∩ 𝕍(𝑝2 )𝐶 is nonempty for any fixed 𝑝1 ∈ 𝑆1 and 𝑝2 ∈ 𝑆2 nonzero polynomials. But
observe that 𝕍(𝑝1 𝑝2 ) = 𝕍(𝑝1 ) ∪ 𝕍(𝑝2 ), so 𝕍(𝑝1 𝑝2 )𝐶 = 𝕍(𝑝1 )𝐶 ∩ 𝕍(𝑝2 )𝐶 but by 1) we know that the
term on the left is infinite, hence nonempty.
3) If 𝑝 vanishes on 𝕍(𝑆)𝐶 for S containing a nonzero polynomial 𝑞 then 𝑝 vanishes on 𝕍(𝑞)𝐶 . If 𝑝
were nonzero, then by 2), 𝕍(𝑞)𝐶 ∩ 𝕍(𝑝)𝐶 is nonempty. This is a contradiction, so 𝑝 is identically
zero.

Let 𝔤 be a finite dimensional Lie algebra of dimension 𝑑 and consider the characteristic polynomial
of an endomorphism ad 𝑎 for some 𝑎 ∈ 𝔤: det𝔤 (ad 𝑎 − 𝜆) = (−𝜆)𝑑 + 𝑐𝑑−1 (−𝜆)𝑑−1 + ... + det(ad 𝑎).

This is a polynomial of degree 𝑑. Because (ad 𝑎)(𝑎) = [𝑎, 𝑎] = 0, we know det(ad 𝑎) = 0 and
the constant term in the polynomial vanishes.
Exercise 7.2. Show that 𝑐𝑗 is a homogeneous polynomial on 𝔤 of degree 𝑑 − 𝑗.

Proof. By ”polynomial
∑ in 𝔤” we mean that if we fix a basis 𝑋1 , 𝑋2 , ..., 𝑋𝑑 of 𝔤 and write a general
element 𝑎 = 𝑖 𝑎𝑖 𝑋𝑖 , then 𝑐𝑘 (𝑎) is a polynomial in the 𝑎𝑖 . Observe that ad 𝑎 is a 𝑑 by 𝑑 matrix
whose entries 𝑏𝑖𝑗 are linear combinations of the 𝑎𝑖 . Now consider det𝔤 (ad 𝑎 − 𝜆). This is a
polynomial in the entries of the matrix ad 𝑎 − 𝜆. A general element in the expansion of this
determinant is 𝑏∗∗ 𝑏∗∗ ...(𝑏𝑖𝑖 − 𝜆)...(𝑏𝑗𝑗 − 𝜆). In order to get a term with 𝜆𝑘 we have to chose 𝑘 𝜆’s
and 𝑑 − 𝑘 of the 𝑏∗∗ in the expansion of this product. Therefore the coefficient of the polynomial
𝜆𝑘 is homogeneous of degree 𝑑 − 𝑘 in the 𝑏∗∗ , so it is also homogeneous of degree 𝑑 − 𝑘 in the 𝑎𝑖
since the 𝑏𝑖𝑗 are linear in the 𝑎𝑖 .

Definition 7.3. The smallest positive integer such that 𝑐𝑟 (𝑎) is not the zero polynomial on 𝔤 is
called the rank of 𝔤. Note 1 ≤ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑛. An element 𝑎 ∈ 𝔤 is called regular if 𝑐𝑟 (𝑎) ∕= 0. The nonzero
polynomial 𝑐𝑟 (𝑎) of degree 𝑑 − 𝑟 is called the discriminant of 𝔤.
Proposition 7.2. Let 𝔤 be a Lie algebra of dimension 𝑑, rank 𝑟 over 𝔽

1) 𝑟 = 𝑑 if and only if 𝔤 is nilpotent.

2
2) If 𝔤 is nilpotent, the set of regular elements is 𝔤.

3) If 𝔤 is not nilpotent, the set of regular elements is infinite if 𝔽 is.

Proof. 1) 𝑟 = 𝑑 means that det(ad 𝑎 − 𝜆) = (−𝜆)𝑑 for all 𝑎. This is true if and only if all the
eigenvalues of ad 𝑎 are 0, which happens if and only if ad 𝑎 is nilpotent for all 𝑎. By Engel’s
theorem, this is equivalent to 𝔤 being nilpotent.
2) If 𝔤 is nilpotent, we know det(ad 𝑎 − 𝜆) = (−𝜆)𝑑 and 𝑐𝑟 = 𝑐𝑑 = 1, which does not vanish
anywhere, so all elements are regular.
3) If 𝔤 is not nilpotent, the set of regular elements is by definition 𝕍(𝑐𝑟 )𝐶 , which is the complement
of a hypersurface, defined by a homogeneous polynomial of degree 𝑑 − 𝑟 > 0 by Ex 7.2. By part 1
of the previous theorem the complement of a hypersurface is an infinite set if 𝔽 is.

Example 7.3. For 𝔤 = 𝔤𝔩𝑛 (𝔽), the rank is 𝑛 and we will find its discriminant. Also, the set of
regular elements consists of all matrices with distinct eigenvalues.

Exercise 7.3. 1) Show that the Jordan decomposition of ad 𝑎 is given by ad 𝑎 = (ad 𝑎𝑠 )+(ad 𝑎𝑛 )
in 𝔤𝔩𝑛
2) If 𝜆1 , ..., 𝜆𝑛 are eigenvalues of 𝑎𝑠 then 𝜆𝑖 − 𝜆𝑗 are eigenvalues of ad 𝑎𝑠
3) ad 𝑎𝑠 has the same eigenvalues as ad 𝑎.

Proof. For 2), If 𝜆1 , ..., 𝜆𝑛 are eigenvalues of 𝑎𝑠 observe that if 𝐸𝑖𝑗 is the matrix with 1 in the
𝑖𝑗 slot and zero elsewhere, then [𝑎𝑠 , 𝐸𝑖𝑗 ] = (𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑖 − 𝑎𝑠𝑗𝑗 )𝐸𝑖𝑗 so ad 𝑎𝑠 is diagonalizable since the
𝐸𝑖𝑗 form a basis of 𝔤𝔩𝑛 (𝔽). The eigenvalues are thus 𝜆𝑖 − 𝜆𝑗 . As for 1), we already showed
that ad 𝑎𝑠 is diagonalizable, also ad 𝑎𝑛 is nilpotent because 𝑎𝑛 is. Finally, ad 𝑎𝑠 and ad 𝑎𝑛
commute: [ad 𝑎𝑠 , ad 𝑎𝑛 ]𝑣 = [𝑎𝑠 , [𝑎𝑛 , 𝑣]] − [𝑎𝑛 , [𝑎𝑠 , 𝑣]] = −[[𝑎𝑠 , 𝑎𝑛 ], 𝑣] = 0 (since [𝑎𝑠 , 𝑎𝑛 ] = 0). Thus
by uniqueness of Jordan form, ad 𝑎 = ad 𝑎𝑠 + ad 𝑎𝑛 . As for 3), we know from Jordan canonical
form that the semisimple part of an operator and the operator itself have the same eigenvalues –
and since ad 𝑎𝑠 is the semisimple part of the operator ad 𝑎, the claim follows.

Exercise 7.4. Deduce the statement∏ of example 1.3 by showing that the rank of 𝔤𝔩𝑛 is 𝑛 and that
the discriminant is given by 𝑐𝑛 (𝑎) = 𝑖∕=𝑗 (𝜆𝑖 − 𝜆𝑗 ). Also compute 𝑐2 (𝑎) for 𝔤𝔩2 (𝔽) in terms of the
matrix coefficients of 𝑎.

Proof. We must compute det(ad 𝑎 − 𝜆). This is equal ∏ to det(ad 𝑎 𝑠 − 𝜆) = ∏ 𝑖,𝑗 (𝜆𝑖 − 𝜆𝑗 − 𝜆). Note
when 𝑖 = 𝑗, we can pull out the (−𝜆), so we have 𝑖,𝑗 (𝜆𝑖 − 𝜆𝑗 −∏ 𝜆) = (−𝜆) 𝑛
𝑖∕=𝑗 (𝜆𝑖 − 𝜆𝑗 − 𝜆). Thus
we see that the rank of 𝔤𝔩𝑛 (𝔽𝑛 ) = 𝑛, and the discriminant is 𝑖∕=𝑗 (𝜆𝑖 − 𝜆𝑗 ). An element in 𝔤𝔩𝑛 is
therefore regular
∏ if and only if all its eigenvalues are distinct. Finally we compute the discriminant
𝑐2 for 𝔤𝔩2 (𝔽): 2
( ) 𝑖∕=𝑗 (𝜆𝑖 − 𝜆𝑗 ) = (𝜆1 − 𝜆2 )(𝜆2 − 𝜆1 ) = −(𝜆1 + 𝜆2 ) + 4𝜆1 𝜆2 . If we write a matrix
𝑎 𝑏
, then the discriminant is −(𝑎 + 𝑑)2 + 4(𝑎𝑑 − 𝑏𝑐). This a clearly a homogeneous polynomial
𝑐 𝑑
of degree 𝑛2 − 𝑛 = 22 − 2 = 2.

You might also like