Shree Ambabai Talim Sanstha’s

SANJAY BHOKARE GROUP OF INSTITUTES, MIRAJ

FACULTY OF POLYTECHNIC
Institute Code: 1552
Department Of Computer Engineering
Micro Project Report
On
A MICROPROJECT ON"ONLINE FEEDBACK SYSTEM"
Project Title
Prepared By
Roll no. Enrolment No. Name
3323 23213180253 Komal Bhauso Gadade
3305 2215520030 Sakshi Sunil Kamble
3318 2215520030 Faika Farukh Shaikh

Under the Guidance of

Name Of Faculty
Submitted To

Maharashtra State Board of Technical Education, Mumbai

(Autonomous) (ISO-9001-2008) (ISO/IEC 27001:2013)
Academic Year 2020-2021

MAHARASHTRA STATE
BOARD OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION
Certificate
 (Only for individual micro project report)

This is to certify that Mr. / Ms.

……………………………………………………… Roll No. ……………….
…., of ………... Semester of Diploma in………………….. Engineering , of
Institute ATS Sanjay Bhokare Group Of Institutes, Faculty Of Polytechnic,
Miraj. (Code: 1552) has completed the Micro-Project work satisfactorily in
course ………………………………. ( ) for the academic year 20……..
to 20…….. as prescribed in the curriculum.

Place: …………… Enrollment No:.……………

Date: …………… Exam. Seat No: ……………

Subject Teacher Head of the Department Principal

MAHARASHTRA STATE
BOARD OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION
Certificate
(Only for Micro Project Group report )

This is to certify that following students,

Roll no. Enrolment No. Exam Seat No. Name

3323 23213180253 Komal Bhauso Gadade

3305 2215520013 sakshi Sunil Kamble

3318 2215520030 Faika Farukh Shaikh

 of …….. Semester of Diploma in………………….. Engineering , of
Institute ATS Sanjay Bhokare Group Of Institutes, Faculty Of Polytechnic,
Miraj. (Code: 1552) are completed the Micro Project work satisfactorily in
course ………………………………. ( ) for the academic year 20……..
to 20…… as prescribed in the curriculum.

Place: ……………
Date: ……………

Subject Teacher Head of the Department Principal

Annexure – I

PART A – Micro-Project Proposal

"Online Feedback System"

1.0 Brief Introduction

In today's software environment writing bug-free code is a challenging task,
which makes software testing an important tool to get quality software. Testing
techniques include the process of executing a program or application with in the
intent of finding software bugs and verifying that the software product is the fit for
use. Students will learn the way to find bugs by applying types, levels, and methods
of software testing on applications with an effective test planning approach. It also
covers manual testing.

2.0 Aim of the Micro-Project

The aim of an "Online Feedback System" microproject is typically to the

streamline and improve the process of collecting, managing, and analyzing in the
feedback from users, customers, or stakeholders. Key objectives include:

1.Efficiency: Automate the feedback collection process, reducing manual efforts and
improving response times.
2.User Engagement: Provide an easy-to-use platform where users can submit the
feedback at their convenience.
 3.Data Management: Centralize feedback data for better organization, retrieval, and
analysis.
4.Improved Decision-Making: Enable organizations to quickly assess user due to the
satisfaction,identify issues, and implement improvements based on real-time
feedback.
5.Transparency: Allow users to track the status of their feedback and feel more
engaged with the process.
6.Customization: Enable tailored feedback forms based on different criteria (e.g.,
product, service, or department)

3.0 Intended Course Outcomes

a) Apply various software testing methods.
b) Prepare test cases for different types and levels of testing.
c) Prepare test plans and defect bug reports.
d) Discipline knowledge: Apply computer engineering knowledge to solve broad-
based computer engineering-related problems.
e) Engineeringtools : Apply appropriate computer engineering-related in the
techniques/tools with an understanding of the limitations.
f) Communication: Proper communication takes place between students and faculty.

4.0 Literature Review

Online feedback systems are increasingly integral in various fields, such as
education, e-commerce, and corporate environments. These systems allow for
efficient collection, management, and analysis of feedback, helping organizations
improve performance, customer satisfaction, and product quality. This literature
review provides an overview of key concepts, advancements, challenges, and
trends in online feedback systems.

1. Importance and Purpose of Online Feedback Systems

Feedback systems, both traditional and online, are crucial for continuous
improvement in any domain. However, online systems offer scalability, ease of use,
and real-time capabilities, allowing organizations to gather data from a larger
audience. In educational contexts, online feedback systems help instructors assess
the effectiveness of their teaching, identify areas for improvement, and promote a
student-centered approach to learning. Similarly, businesses use customer feedback
systems to monitor product performance, enhance customer experience, and foster
innovation.
a) Studies Highlighting Importance:
1.Educational Context: A study by Hattie and Timperley (2007) emphasized the role
of feedback in enhancing student learning outcomes. The transition to online
systems in this domain allows for more systematic collection and analysis of
student feedback,resulting in more adaptive teaching methods.
2.Corporate Context: Systems such as 360-degree feedback, implemented online, are
crucial for employee development. London & Smither (1995) noted that timely
and constructive feedback aids in improving job performance and personal growth.
 2. Types of Online Feedback Systems
There are various types of online feedback systems, each designed to cater to
different feedback needs. Common categories include:
a) Anonymous Feedback Systems: Designed to promote honesty by allowing users to
submit feedback without revealing their identity. They are widely used in education
institutions and workplaces to avoid bias or fear of repercussions.
b) Peer-to-Peer Feedback Systems: Often used in collaborative environments like
classrooms and workplaces, these systems encourage constructive criticism from
peers,facilitating mutual learning.
c) Automated Feedback Systems: Leveraging algorithms to provide instant feedback
based on predefined criteria, these systems are increasingly used in online learning
platforms and customer service interactions.
Technological Developments:
Machine Learning in Feedback Systems: Emerging trends in the application of AI
and machine learning to feedback systems enable automated analysis of large
datasets. For instance, sentiment analysis can automatically categorize feedback
as positive, neutral, or negative, helping organizations act more efficiently.
Integration with Learning Management Systems (LMS)*: Many educational
institutions now integrate online feedback systems with LMSs like Moodle or
Blackboard, enabling seamless feedback collection and performance tracking.

3. Challenges in Online Feedback Systems

While online feedback systems offer many benefits, they also pose challenges in
implementation and effectiveness. Some key challenges include:
a) Bias and Authenticity: Users may provide biased feedback or manipulate responses
when anonymity is ensured. Additionally, incentivized feedback in e-commerce
often leads to exaggerated reviews.
b) Engagement and Participation: A significant challenge in both educational and
corporate settings is ensuring sufficient participation. Many users may avoid
providing feedback due to time constraints or lack of motivation.
c) Data Privacy and Security: Collecting and storing sensitive feedback, especially
when it is anonymous, raises concerns about data privacy and potential misuse.

1. Studies Addressing Challenges:

a) Bias in Feedback: Research by Anderson et al. (2013) highlights how anonymity can
lead to non-constructive or biased feedback in peer reviews. Solutions such as semi-
anonymous systems have been explored to balance honesty and accountability.
b) Participation Rates: Govaerts and Vandenberghe (2011) studied participation rates
in online feedback systems and found that factors like ease of use, perceived
impact, and relevance significantly affect engagement levels.

4. Impact of Online Feedback Systems on Organizational Performance

Studies across various sectors demonstrate that organizations with well-implemented
online feedback systems tend to show higher levels of customer and employee
 satisfaction. For instance, a meta-analysis by Kluger and DeNisi (1996) found that
organizations that actively use feedback systems improve both individual and team
performance. Additionally, e-commerce platforms like Amazon have revolutionized
customer feedback mechanisms, integrating reviews into the buying process to boost
trust and transparency.

Examples of Impact:
a) E-commerce: Online feedback in platforms like Amazon and Yelp helps companies
maintain product quality and customer service standards. Recent advancements
include AI-powered suggestion systems based on customer reviews.
Education: In academia, online feedback systems have been linked to better course
design, improved student satisfaction, and enhanced learning outcomes, as noted by
Carless (2015).

5. Future Trends in Online Feedback Systems

With advancements in AI, data analytics, and human-computer interaction, the future
of online feedback systems appears promising. Future trends may include:
a) Real-time Feedback Systems: Integration with AI will enable systems to provide
real-time feedback during customer interactions, online learning, and work
performance assessments.
b) Advanced Sentiment Analysis: As AI improves, sentiment analysis in feedback will
become more accurate and nuanced, allowing for deeper understanding and faster
action on user feedback.
c) Increased Personalization: Feedback systems will likely evolve to offer more
personalized feedback experiences, especially in e-learning platforms and customer
service.

4.0 Proposed Methodology

a) Apply different software testing methods.
b) Prepare test cases for different types and levels of testing.
c) Prepare test plans and defect bug reports.
d) Discipline knowledge: Use computer engineering knowledge to solve broad-based
computer engineering-related problems.
e) Engineering tools: Apply appropriate computer engineering-related in the
techniques/tools with an understanding of the limitations.
f) Communication: Proper communication takes place between students and faculty.

5.0 Resources Required

S. No. Name of Resource/material Specifications Qty Remarks
• Computer system 4 GB 1
RAM,windows 10
OS
• Textbook/manual STE Software 1
Testing 22518
6.0 Action Plan (Sequence and time required for major activities for 8 Weeks)
S. No. Details of activity Planned Start Planned Name of Responsible
date Finish date Team Members
• Searching the topic for micro-
project
• collect information from the
internet and textbook
• collect information from the
STE Software Testing
reference book.
• arrange all information in ms
word
• Prepare a report on it using MS
word
• print micro project

Annexure – II
PART B – Micro-Project Report

A MICRO PROJECT ON "Online Feedback System"

1.0 Rationale

In this project, we are going to test an Online Feedback System using Software
Testing. The online feedback system is a web-based system that provides a way
for colleges to allow students to give feedback to staff online to improve their
teaching.Students are required to give feedback using one standard feedback
form. In our project,the security is also maintained by the result of feedback being
only visible to the authentic users. This project also includes a time portal. This
system helps teachers to improve their performance by analyzing the feedback
given by students. The above features will be tested using Software testing in
different techniques in this project. This system is not time- bound due to which
students will give monthly feedback.

2.0 Course Outcomes Addressed

1. Problem-Solving: Analyzing requirements and designing a solution.
2. Programming Skills: Developing and testing software applications.
3. Database Management: Designing and managing databases for feedback storage.
4. Web Development: Building responsive and functional web interfaces.
5. Teamwork: Collaborating and managing project tasks.
 6. User Experience (UX): Creating user-friendly feedback forms and interfaces.
7. Data Analytics: Analyzing feedback data for insights.
8. Security: Ensuring data privacy and system security.
These outcomes enhance technical skills and practical problem-solving in
software development.

3.0 Literature Review

1. Introduction
Online feedback systems have become a cornerstone in various fields such as
education, e-commerce, healthcare, and corporate environments. These systems
enable organizations to collect, manage, and analyze feedback efficiently from
diverse stakeholders, including customers, students, and employees. This literature
review synthesizes key research and developments on online feedback systems,
discussing their importance, types, challenges, and future trends.

2. Importance of Online Feedback Systems

The adoption of online feedback systems has transformed how organizations assess
performance, gather opinions, and improve services. In educational settings,
feedback from students plays a critical role in enhancing teaching methodologies,
course content,and overall student engagement. Similarly, businesses rely on
customer feedback to improve products and services and make data-driven
decisions.

a) Key Studies:
Education: Hattie and Timperley (2007) underscored the importance of feedback
in improving student learning. Online feedback systems, integrated into learning
management systems, have expanded the scale and scope of feedback collection,
making it easier for educators to respond to student needs.
Business: In customer service and product development, systems like Net
Promoter Score (NPS) and online review platforms (e.g., Amazon, Yelp) have
become indispensable tools. Research by Cheung and Thadani (2012) shows that
user-generated online feedback can influence consumer purchasing behavior.

3. Types of Online Feedback Systems

Online feedback systems can be categorized based on their use, anonymity, and the
manner in which feedback is provided and processed. The following are some
common types:
a) Anonymous Feedback Systems: These systems encourage users to provide honest
feedback without revealing their identity. They are often used in academic
environments or workplaces where employees can freely critique without fear of
retaliation.
b) Peer Feedback Systems: Peer feedback, especially in educational and professional
settings, involves collecting evaluations from colleagues or classmates. It promotes
collaborative learning and shared responsibility for improvement.
c) Automated Feedback Systems: With advancements in technology, many platforms
 now offer automated feedback based on predefined criteria. These are popular in e-
learning platforms where quizzes and assignments are graded instantly, providing
students with immediate results.

1. Technological Integration:
Machine Learning: Automated feedback systems have been enhanced by machine
learning algorithms that analyze large datasets and provide insights. In education,
machine learning can identify patterns in student performance and generate
personalized feedback (Zhang & Litman, 2016).
Customer Feedback Systems: Many e-commerce platforms integrate AI to assess
customer satisfaction through sentiment analysis, categorizing feedback into positive,
neutral, or negative, as highlighted in research by Liu (2010).

4. Challenges in Online Feedback Systems

Despite the advantages of online feedback systems, there are several challenges
associated with their implementation and effectiveness.
a) Bias and Manipulation: One of the major issues in online feedback systems is the
potential for biased or manipulated feedback. Users may leave extreme positive or
negative reviews based on non-objective factors, as noted by Hu et al. (2006).
Anonymous systems can also encourage overly harsh or unconstructive criticism.
b) Low Engagement: A common challenge is getting users to participate in the feedback
process. Students, customers, or employees might not feel motivated to provide
feedback, particularly if they perceive that it won’t lead to meaningful changes (Boud
& Molloy,2013).
c) Data Privacy and Security: Ensuring the privacy and security of collected feedback is
essential, especially in cases where sensitive data is involved. Mishandling of data can
lead to breaches of confidentiality, which can deter users from participating in online
feedback systems.

1. Addressing Challenges:
Engagement Strategies: Research suggests that incorporating gamification and the
offering incentives can increase participation rates in feedback systems (Domínguez
et al., 2013). Providing users with feedback on how their input is used can also foster
higher engagement.
Combating Bias: Studies, like those by Mollick and Nanda (2016), propose the use of
semi-anonymous systems where some level of accountability is retained, reducing the
likelihood of extreme bias.

5. Impact of Online Feedback Systems on Organizational Performance

Research shows that well-implemented online feedback systems can positively affect
organizational performance across sectors.

a) Education: Studies have demonstrated that universities using online feedback systems
report improved teaching quality, as instructors can quickly adapt based on student
suggestions (Nicol & Macfarlane-Dick, 2006).
b) E-commerce: In business, online customer reviews have become critical to brand
reputation and customer acquisition. A study by Luca (2011) found that a one-star
increase in a restaurant's Yelp rating leads to a 5-9% increase in revenue, indicating
the strong link between online feedback and business success.

6. Future Trends in Online Feedback Systems

Technological advancements and changing user expectations are shaping the future of
online feedback systems in the following ways:

a) Real-time Feedback: In customer service and employee performance management,

real-time feedback systems are becoming more prevalent. These systems allow for
instantaneous insights and adjustments, creating a more dynamic and responsive
feedback loop.

b) Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Big Data: The integration of AI and big data analytics
into feedback systems enables deeper insights into user behaviors and preferences. AI-
driven sentiment analysis and text mining can quickly process and interpret vast
amounts of feedback, providing actionable recommendations (Bishop, 2017).

c) Personalization: Future feedback systems may increasingly focus on personalized

feedback, tailoring responses to individual needs. In education, for example,
personalized learning environments can use feedback to adapt content and teaching
methods to fit each student's learning style (Xu & Koedinger, 2015).

4.0 Actual Methodology Followed

1. Requirement Analysis
a) Identify and gather the system's requirements, including the types of feedback to
be collected (e.g., customer feedback, employee feedback).
b) Consult stakeholders (users, admins) to understand their expectations from the
system.
c) Define functional and non-functional requirements (e.g., system must be user-
friendly, secure, scalable).

2. System Design
a) Frontend Design: Create wireframes and design the user interface (UI) for the
feedback submission and administration.
b) Backend Design: Design the system architecture, including database design to
store feedback data and logic for processing.
c) Technology Stack Selection:Choose appropriate technologies (e.g.,HTML/CSS/
JavaScript for frontend, PHP/Node.js for backend, MySQL for database).

3. Development
a) Frontend Development: Implement the user interface to allow users to submit
feedback and view feedback history.
 b) Backend Development: Develop server-side logic for handling form submissions,
storing data, and providing admin access to view/manage feedback.
c) Database Implementation: Set up databases for storing feedback, user details, and
system logs.

4. Testing
a) Unit Testing: Test individual components to ensure each part (form submission,
data storage, etc.) works as expected.
b) Integration Testing: Test how different modules of the system work together.
c) User Acceptance Testing (UAT): Get feedback from a sample of users to verify
that the system meets their expectations.

5. Deployment
a) Deploy the feedback system on a server or cloud platform, ensuring it accessible
to users.
b) Set up backup and recovery protocols to maintain data integrity.

6. Maintenance and Updates

a) Monitor system performance and user feedback.
b) Address bugs and make improvements based on user feedback and changing
requirements.

Tools Used:
1. Frontend: HTML, CSS, JavaScript, React/Angular.
2. Backend: PHP, Node.js, Python (Flask/Django).
3. Database: MySQL, PostgreSQL, or MongoDB.
4 .Version Control: Git for code management.
5. Testing Tools: Selenium, JUnit, manual testing.

This structured methodology ensures the successful development of a user-

friendly, secure, and efficient online feedback system.

5.0 Actual Resources Used (Mention the actual resources used).

S. No. Name of Resource/material Specifications Qty Remarks

• Computer system 4 GB RAM,windows 1
8.1 OS
• Textbook/manual STE Software Testing 1
22518

6.0 Outputs of the Micro-Project

1. Functional Feedback System: A working platform for users to submit feedback
and admins to manage it.
2. Feedback Forms: Custom forms for feedback submission.
3. Database: Secure storage of feedback data.
4. Reporting and Analytics: Reports and dashboards showing feedback trends and
analysis.
5. Security Features: User authentication and data protection measures.
6. Error Handling and Notifications: Alerts and handling of system errors.
7. Documentation: User and technical manuals.
 8. Test Reports: Results from system testing phases.
9. Source Code: Full project code, maintained in version control.
10. Project Presentation: Demonstration of the system’s functionality.

7.0 Skill Developed / learning out of this Micro-Project

1. Programming Skills: Proficiency in web development (frontend and backend) and
database management.
2. Problem-Solving: Analyzing requirements and designing efficient solutions.
3. Database Design: Creating and managing databases for storing feedback data.
4.User Experience (UX) Design: Developing intuitive and user-friendly interfaces.
5. Project Management: Planning, executing, and testing within deadlines.
6. Teamwork: Collaborating effectively with team members.
7. Data Security: Implementing security measures for user data protection.
8.Testing & Debugging: Conducting thorough testing to ensure system functionality

8.0 Applications of this Micro-Project

1. Educational Institutions
a) Student Feedback on Courses and Professors: Universities and schools can use the
system to gather feedback from students on their learning experience, course
content,teaching methods, and instructor performance. This helps in improving
curriculum and faculty development.
b) Course Evaluations and Accreditation: The feedback system can be used as a tool
for ongoing course evaluations and to support accreditation processes by
providing real-time feedback data.

2. Customer Service in Businesses

a) Product and Service Feedback: Businesses can implement an online feedback
system to gather customer opinions on products and services, enabling them to
identify areas for improvement. This helps in enhancing customer satisfaction and
refining product offerings.
b) Customer Support Evaluation: Companies can allow customers to provide the
feedback on their support interactions, helping in monitoring the effectiveness of
customer service teams and processes.
c) Net Promoter Score (NPS)*: Businesses can use the system to collect NPS data,
which measures customer loyalty and satisfaction.

3. Employee Feedback within Organizations

a) Employee Satisfaction Surveys*: Companies can use the feedback system to collect
employee feedback on workplace culture, management practices, job satisfaction,
and other HR-related areas. This can drive organizational changes and improve
employee engagement.
b) Performance Appraisal*: Feedback can be gathered from peers, subordinates, and
supervisors for performance evaluations, supporting 360-degree reviews.

4. Event Management
 a) Attendee Feedback on Events: Event organizers can use the system to gather
feedback from participants regarding event logistics, speaker performance, content
quality, and overall experience. This data can be used to improve future events.
b) Post-Event Surveys: A feedback system can be used to collect feedback after an
event to measure success and pinpoint areas for improvement, helping organizers
enhance upcoming events.

5. Healthcare Sector
a) Patient Feedback on Healthcare Services: Hospitals and clinics can implement the
system to collect feedback from patients on the quality of care, staff behavior, wait
times, and overall experience. This can help healthcare providers improve service
delivery and patient satisfaction.
b) Doctor and Staff Reviews: Patients can provide feedback on their interactions with
doctors, nurses, and administrative staff, helping medical facilities monitor perform
and make necessary improvements.

6. E-commerce and Retail

a) Product Reviews and Ratings*: Online retailers can use feedback systems to allow
customers to rate and review products. This feedback helps potential buyers make
informed decisions and allows sellers to improve their products.
b) Customer Satisfaction Surveys*: E-commerce platforms can collect post-purchase
feedback to evaluate the overall shopping experience, delivery process, and
customer support.

7. Public Services and Government

a) Citizen Feedback on Public Services: Government agencies can collect feedback
from citizens on various public services, such as healthcare, education, transport
and law enforcement. This feedback can be used to enhance service delivery and
improve policy-making.
b) Policy Impact Assessments: Governments can use the system to gather feedback on
the impact of new policies, enabling them to make data-driven decisions and adjust
policies based on public sentiment.

9.0 Area of Future Improvement

1. Personalization:
Use machine learning to provide personalized feedback forms based on user history
or preferences. This can help in asking relevant questions and collecting more
accurate feedback.

2. Real-time Analysis and Insights:

Implement real-time analytics and AI-driven insights to identify trends, sentiment, or
urgent concerns, allowing immediate action based on feedback.

3. Enhanced User Engagement:

Introduce interactive feedback methods like chatbots, voice-to-text feedback, or
 gamified surveys to increase participation rates.

4. Data Privacy and Security:

Strengthen data encryption and privacy protocols to ensure users feel safe providing
sensitive feedback, building trust in the system.

5. Integration with Other Systems:

Seamlessly integrate with CRM, customer service, and marketing tools to allow
feedback data to be actionable across various departments and platforms.

6. AI-Powered Sentiment Analysis:

Use AI to automatically categorize feedback by tone (positive, negative, neutral) and
provide a summary of user sentiment over time.

7. Feedback Loop Closure:

Implement a system to ensure users know how their feedback is being acted upon.
This could involve sending follow-up messages when changes are made based on
their input.

8. Multichannel Feedback Collection:

Allow users to provide feedback via multiple channels, such as social media, mobile
apps, email, and websites, to make it more convenient for them to respond.

9. Improved Customization:
Offer businesses more flexibility in customizing their feedback forms, including
adding multimedia, dynamic question generation, and multi-language support.

10. Advanced Reporting:

Provide more detailed and visual reporting features, including customizable
dashboards, heatmaps, and feedback trend graphs for better decision-making.

These improvements can increase engagement, streamline operations, and make

feedback more actionable.

**************

Annexure – III
Teacher Evaluation Sheet
Name of Student: ………………………………………………………… Enrollment No. ……………………………………
Name of Programme………………………………………………… Semester: ………………………………………… Course
Title ……………………………………………………………….. Code:………………………………………………………………

Title of the Micro-Project: …………………………………………………………………………………………………….

 (For Office Use Only)
Course Outcomes Achieved
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Evaluation as per Suggested Rubric for Assessment of Micro Project
• (Please tick in appropriate cell for each characteristic)
S. Characteristic to Poor Average Good Excellent
No be assessed ( Marks 1-3 ) ( Marks 4 - 5 ) ( Marks 6 - 8 ) ( Marks 9- 10 )
.
1 Relevance to the Relate to very Related to some Take care of at- Take care of more
course few LOs Los least one CO than one CO
• ..
2 Literature Not more than At-least 5 relevant At –least 7 About 10 relevant
Survey two sources sources, at least 2 relevant sources, sources, most
/information (primary and latest most latest latest
collection secondary), very
old reference

3 Completion of Completed less Completed 50 to Completed 60 to Completed more

the Target as per than 50% 60% 80% than 80 %
project proposal
4 Analysis of Data Sample Size Sufficient and Sufficient and Enough data
and small, data appropriate appropriate collected by
representation neither sample, enough sample, enough sufficient and
organized nor data generated data generated appropriate
presented well but not organized which is organized sample size.
and not presented and presented Proper inferences
well. No or poor well but poor drawn by
inferences drawn inferences drawn organising and
presenting data
through tables,
charts and graphs.

5 Quality of Incomplete Just Well Well

Prototype/Mode fabrication/asse assembled/fabrica assembled/fabrica assembled/fabrica
l mbly. ted and parts are ted with proper ted with proper
not functioning functioning parts. functioning parts.
well. Not in proper In proper shape, In proper shape,
shape, dimensions within tolerance within tolerance
beyond tolerance dimensions and dimensions and
limit. good good
Appearance/finish finish/appearance. finish/appearance.
is shabby. But no creativity in Creativity in
design and use of design and use of
material material

6 Report Very short, poor Nearly sufficient Detailed, correct Very detailed,
Preparation quality sketches, and correct details and clear correct, clear
 Details about about methods, description of description of
methods, material, methods, methods,
material, precautions and materials, materials,
precaution and conclusion, but precautions and precautions and
conclusions clarity is not there Conclusions. conclusions.
omitted, some in presentation. Sufficient Graphic Enough tables,
details are But not enough Description. charts and
wrong graphic sketches
description.

7 Presentation Major Includes major Includes major Well organized,

information is information but information and includes major
not included, not well organized well organized but information ,well
information is and not presented not presented well presented
not well well
organized .
8 Any other
(depending upon
nature of
project: please
write indicators
by pen)
Defense Could not reply Replied to Replied properly Replied most of
9 to considerable considerable to considerable the questions
number of number of number of properly
question. questions but not question.
very properly

MIcro-Project Evaluation Sheet

Process Assessment Product Assessment Total

Part A - Project Project Methodology Part B - Project individual Marks
Proposal (2 marks) Report/Working Model Presentation/Viva 10
(2 marks) (2 marks) (4 marks)

Note:
Every course teacher is expected to assign marks for group evolution for each group of students in first 3
columns as per rubrics & individual evaluation in 4TH column for each group of students as per rubrics
based on viva.

Comments/Suggestions about team work/leadership/inter-personal communication (if any)

………………………………………………………………………………………………
 ……………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………..

Any Other Comment:

……………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………

Name and designation of the Faculty Member…………………………………….

Signature………………………………………………………………………………

Date:………………………..