Rink ChopinsBalladesDialectic 1994
Rink ChopinsBalladesDialectic 1994
Rink ChopinsBalladesDialectic 1994
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Wiley is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Music Analysis
JOHN RINK
'Chopin at the supreme summit of his art' (Huneker 1900: 163), 't
power as an artist' (Niecks 1888: 268), 'the crown of Chopin's wor
1939: 106), 'one of Chopin's supreme achievements' (Samson 1985:
these comments bears witness to the enthusiastic critical respons
Ballades throughout the past 150 years.* Structurally complex and highly
expressive, the four masterpieces have also attracted a wide range of analytical
approaches during this time. Studying these disparate analyses - which is the
purpose of this article - allows one not only to determine how the four works have
been variously understood in the literature, but also to draw conclusions about
how analysis has evolved as a discipline since the Ballades were written.'
The ballad genre itself had experienced a complicated evolution before
Chopin's Op. 23 was published in 1836 (the other three - Opp. 38, 47 and 52 -
dating from 1840, 1841 and 1843 respectively), and authors such as Wieslaw
Lisecki (1990), Anselm Gerhard (1991) and James Parakilas (1992) have
attempted to place the four Ballades in a number of historical contexts, as if
deriving from different dance, literary, operatic or folk traditions. These effort
have met with varying degrees of success, and here it suffices to note a gener
description of the ballad tradition as a background to studying Chopin's unique
conception of the genre. Among the ballad's chief characteristics were a 'bold,
* A French translation of an earlier version of this article appeared in Analyse musicale, No. 27 (1992); a Polis
translation will be published in Rocznik Chopinowski, Vol. 21 (1994).
the locus of expression in a musical composition ... neither in its wider surfaces
nor in its more detailed motivic contours, but in its comprehensive design,
which includes all the sonic elements and relates them to one another in a
significant temporal structure. In other words, extrageneric meaning can be
explained only in terms of congeneric [meaning]. If verbalization of true
content - the specific expression uniquely embodied in a work - is possible at
all, it must depend on close structural analysis (Cone 1982: 235).
The hermeneutics alluded to here shapes not only Cone's study of Op.52
(discussed below) but also other recent analyses of the Ballades which attempt
through theory to legitimise or universalise the listener's subjective reactions to
the music. It thus completes the quasi-dialectical succession alluded to above,
from the 'literary' critical discourse of Schumann and other nineteenth-century
writers, through the structural diagrams of Leichtentritt, Schenker et al., and the
I I I- -. . I6 fi f
IFIM II ..lf I I l I V,.n. L , I I I I 1 1 I
A- [34]
II L, L- -- - k
i OP
1 2 -1 o 'T 4
34
,3 I I I I
1 2 34
a# ,rt.L-- I l I opl H | OP I ! I I I I l
I+ bi+, IIQIb?l I I I r I I Ilm11 F .n
%.I, "IJI L I I I I I I I l l I ' J i 'J L l I IA
5 (n n) 5 4 3 2 1
VI ( ) (p.t. )
A- -B- -A2
boldly derive
(Schenker 197
Apart from t
Ballades is restricted to brief passages (see Figs. 64 and 119/10 in Free Com-
position), but his theoretical framework has of course influenced numerous
full-scale studies by many authors. Franz Eibner, for example, posits that 'organic'
form in Chopin's music derives from contrapuntal principles, that the bass has
linear direction and is not merely a harmonic foundation, and that anomalies
result when form is defined in thematic terms only. Other Schenker-inspired
writers have puzzled over the problematic second Ballade, in which Schenker's
notion of unified tonal structure is seriously undermined by an F major/A minor
tonal polarity. Theories of monotonality, interlocking tonal structures, 'directional
tonality' (in which two tonics operate in succession) and the 'two-key scheme' (in
which two tonics function simultaneously - also known as 'tonal pairing' or the
'double-tonic complex') have been variously applied to Op. 38 by Harald Krebs,
William Kinderman, Wai-Ling Cheong, Samson and others. Krebs provides a
graphic reduction fundamentally different from those of Schenker, demonstrating
two different, overlapping I-V-I structural progressions related by a third, each of
which 'supports its own Kopfton' (1981: 13): C as 3 of F major at the beginning,
and E as 5 of A minor at the end. In contrast Kinderman treats the opening F
major as a 'secondary tonality', as 'LVI' of A minor, which, although eventually
defined as the tonic, is not 'an initial point of orientation' but 'the goal of a
directional process' (1988: 59). This interpretation differs in essence from the
structure proposed by Samson ('it can only be explained as a two-key scheme'
[1992a: 54]) and by Cheong, whose study (which aims 'to evaluate the Ballade on
the basis of its own inner compositional logic' [1988: 52]) concludes with the
following penetrating insight on the two-key scheme's status in nineteenth-century
repertoire:
As Chopin's Op.38 comes to end [sic] in a minor key that lies a major third
5I 54
b-mo: V. T T V, 2 I
b-moll: Vil 34 6 T R)VIlr 1j;2
69-73 cc
63-4 476a
98-101 c47
171-2
M2 16 177-9
51-2 23 - ..
c extenea
Nov J
It is not so much the intrinsic qualities of the musical work which may suggest
a narrative, but our predisposition - given the genre title - to construct a
narrative from the various ways in which purely musical events are
transformed through time. Such a musical narrative would be based on the
generic character and interplay of themes, on the transformation of
conventional formal successions and on the organisation of large-scale tonal
relationships (: 14).
Music itself cannot 'speak', it can only indirectly give the impression of
speech... . The effect of an epic tale, a dramatic or pathetic oration or a
lyrical ode can be created through musical means. Music must avail itself of
these [evocative] devices (1976: 42).
Carl Dahlhaus writes that in Op.23, which 'distantly recalls sonata form, being
based on an underlying contrast of themes', 'it is not the first theme, with its
narrative "ballad tone", but the cantabile second theme that forms the main idea
of the work, an idea emphasized more and more strongly as the piece progresses'.
He suggests that Op.23 'owes its title to its "change of tones", its alternation of the
lyric, epic, and dramatic'; this presented Chopin 'with the problem of establishing
a formal equilibrium between narrative ballad, lyric cantabile, and an urgent
virtuosity that appears with the effect of an explosion'. The composer's
'sophisticated' solution was to recapitulate the parts 'in substance but transformed
in function; in this dialectic lies the structural and aesthetic point of the work'
(1989: 148-9).
Serge Gut takes issue with Dahlhaus in a detailed study of Op.23 (1989),
which explores how principles from the literary ballad were assimilated by Chopin
into a piano idiom, focusing on 'conflicts between language and structure,
language having an aesthetic function and structure providing the musical logic'.
Gut dissects the work according to 'musical content', tonality and 'style' (i.e.
narrative, lyric, epic, dramatic and virtuosic), showing 'the relationship between
the different "styles" on the one hand (language) and themes and tonalities on the
other (structure)' (see Ex. 6). Three structural elements are isolated: the
'narrative' Theme I, the 'lyrical' Theme II and a 'flexible component' - 'all the
new piano figuration and virtuosic traits'. Discerning 'a fundamental bitonality
which unfolds on two levels which, though different, are of equal value' (in
contrast to Schenker's monotonal analysis, discussed above), Gut claims that the
work's tonal structure and aesthetic shape ('the emotional form created by
language') are out of phase: 'in short, the structural climax does not correspond to
the aesthetic climax'. He concludes that 'there results from this non-convergence a
curious "equilibrium within disequilibrium"'
Number of bars 7 28 32 26 12 20
I 86 32
I
Musical content figuration Th. I 'bridge' III Th.
Th. I I Th. II
Tonality g g g E a A
Style narrative narrative narrative/ lyric narrative/ lyric/
lyric epic epic
Number of bars 12 12 16 28 14 57
I I I
Tonality E [ I E [ I E? E g g
Style .... dramatic .... lyric narrative/ dramatic
virtuosity epic
I not to do + + 0 0 ab
II to be 0 + 0 - + + mab
III to do ++ - + -+ ++ - + - 0 mab-mab
IV not to do 0 + 0 + mab
V not to be - 0 0 0 mab+
trans-
VII to
to do
appear ++ + + - + ++ 0 +ab
VIII not to be + + - ++ 0 Fm+ab-mab
trans+
IX to appear - -0 0 ++ - mab
to be
X to be 0 - + -- - ++ m+ab
XI not to be +- ++ -- -- + m+ab-mab
trans+
XII to do ++ + - 0 - - -t++ - m+ab
XIII to do= ++ - 0 +~ ++ ++ 0 mab
to be
a = appear
b = be
m = make
never resolved, those that are resolved and those that amount to 'reinter-
pretations', i.e. they are not even recognised as ambiguities until they are resolved.
Ambiguous elements in short passages (where Chopin employs such means as
gradual, postponed and absent resolution) are related to long-range strategies for
dealing with ambiguities of form, key and metre. Like Krystyna Wilkowska's
study of harmony, form and 'emotional expression' in the Ballades (Wilkowska
1949), Cone's investigation thus links musical details with particular expressive
functions - as (to some extent) does Karol Berger's historically oriented study of
Op.23 (1994).
This is also the aim of Lawrence Kramer's 1985 article on Chopin, which,
though not concerned with the Ballades, is nevertheless pertinent here. Alluding to
'a growing feeling that to isolate musical form in a realm all its own is both futile
and sterile', Kramer articulates a 'need for productive methods of critical inter-
pretation that are neither broadly analogical nor narrowly historicist' (: 145). He
bases his analysis of Chopin's A minor Prelude, Op. 28, No. 2 on 'structural
tropes', i.e. 'recurrent formal configurations that carry a distinctive expressive
potential in music and that are understood rhetorically and figuratively in literary
or speculative texts', forming 'a loosely connected repertoire of expressive
scenarios', of 'miniature genres', of 'typical structural patterns that normally
apply on a limited scale' (: 146).4 The Prelude (like the Ballades) is 'a many-
sided study in dialectic, taking the term in the precise sense of dynamic
oppositions that involve a reversal of meaning or value'. Specifically, 'dialectical
Only in the last two-and-a-half measures are melody and harmony realigned,
but here they are not so much reconciled as fused together, rendered
indistinguishable from each other... . After tearing melody and harmony
further and further apart, the prelude closes by effacing the difference between
them (: 148).
Kramer notes furthermore that 'the unresolvable clash between melody and
harmony represents Chopin's way of staging a larger dialectic between Classical
authority and Romantic innovation', in which the melodic design satisfies
'Classical demands for balance and resolution', whereas the harmony is 'com-
pletely unclassical, or rather anticlassical' (: 148, 149). Thus both a dialectical
internal design and a dialectical compositional style are in operation. In the case of
the Ballades, an analogous (though distinct) pair of embedded dialectical
relationships can be observed: at the level of the work, the thematic and harmonic
dialectic (which culminates in the 'irreversible metamorphosis' alluded to by
Witten) articulated within each of the four pieces, and at the level of reception
history, the dialectical 'framework' that embraces over a century-and-a-half of
analysis of the Ballades. The culmination of this latter dialectic, apparent in
certain recent studies, is (as noted earlier) a 'reconciliatory' if aesthetically prob-
lematic synthesis of the subjective and the objective, the narrative and the
structuralist tendencies discernible in nineteenth- and twentieth-century writing
on these compositions.
This survey of the many disparate analytical methodologies - literary,
descriptive, formal, rhythmic, metrical, tonal, thematic, textural, interpretative,
programmatic, semiotic and hermeneutic - brought to bear upon Chopin's
Ballades invites final consideration of possible ways forward in the study of these
masterpieces - in other words, a look at what lies beyond the putatively 'closed'
dialectical framework sketched above. Certainly much remains to be done in the
sphere of so-called critical analysis, particularly with regard to Op.52, which,
undeniably one of Chopin's greatest works, is surely rich enough to warrant
further analytical investigation. I for one would welcome an historically
contextualised analytical study of this piece in terms of eighteenth- and
nineteenth-century improvisatory traditions, for the work's 'new fluidity and
unpredictability' (Samson 1992a: 17) and especially its rapid changes in 'affect'
(both of which are characteristic of Chopin's late music generally - compare the
Barcarolle, Op.60, Polonaise-Fantasie, Op.61, and Nocturnes, Op.62, all from
1845-6) are extremely suggestive of improvisation, as commentators like Huneker,
Cortot, Abraham and Samson have independently pointed out. An inquiry into
this aspect of the music is therefore especially enticing. In a similar vein, assessing
the four Ballades in the light of contemporary (i.e. nineteenth-century) aesthetics
or music theory might bear fruit, as could a fully-fledged post-structuralist study
(insofar as any such analysis can be aesthetically justified). For instance, current
research linking psychoanalytic theory to musical structure might profitably be
extended to these emotionally intense, highly charged compositions. I am more
confident, however, of the potential in analysing the four pieces in terms relevant
to the performer, whose concerns are largely neglected in the foregoing array of
analytical studies. The relation between analysis and performance is of course a
Obviously the same is true of analysis: however much an analysis reveals about a
work, it can never be exhaustive or definitive; however much it allows us to know
about the work, it is always possible to know the music more intimately (the
distinction in French between savoir and connaitre is instructive here). This is why
the performer often has an edge over the analyst: to perform a work with any
conviction on a given occasion, it is essential to know it in this way (whether
consciously or not), to grasp 'the whole piece of music in a nutshell' in the mind,
to 'become' the music while performing (see Stein 1962: 71). The degree to which
a particular analysis succeeds may depend on how well the analyst can also do this
(as Dunsby [1993] implies), sensing and communicating - as the performer must -
elusive parameters like momentum, shape and timing, and the hidden 'story' or
message latent in the score, that 'mysterious tale which the music unfolds'. Such
communication lies at the heart of convincing interpretation, whether in prose or
in sound.
While these last remarks do not necessarily define an agenda for furthe
analytical studies of the Ballades, the issues they have raised are neverthele
germane. However cogent previous research on the Ballades has been in revealin
their inner workings and their various 'meanings' (and indeed much of th
NOTES
REFERENCES
California Press).
Krebs, H., 1981: 'Alternatives to Monotonality in Early Nineteenth-Century
Music', Journal of Music Theory, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp.1-16.
Leichtentritt, H., 1922: Analyse der Chopin'schen Klavierwerke, Vol. 2 (Berlin: Max
Hesses Verlag).
Lisecki, W., 1990: 'Die Ballade von Frederic Chopin - literarische oder
musikalische Inspirationen?', Chopin Studies, Vol. 3, pp.305-17.
Nattiez, J.-J., 1990: 'Can One Speak of Narrativity in Music?', Journal of the R
Musical Association, Vol. 115, No. 2, pp.240-57.
Newcomb, A., 1987: 'Schumann and Late Eighteenth-Century Narrative
Strategies', 19th-Century Music, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp.164-74.
1994: 'The Polonaise-Fantasy and Issues of Musical Narrative', in Chopin
Studies 2, ed. J. Rink and J. Samson (Cambridge: CUP, forthcoming).
Nicholls, S., 1986: 'The Thread of the Chopin Ballades', Music and Musicians,
pp.16-19.
Niecks, F., 1888: Frederick Chopin as a Man and Musician, 2 vols (London:
Novello).
Parakilas, J., 1992: Ballads Without Words: Chopin and the Tradition of the
Instrumental Ballade (Portland, Oregon: Amadeus Press).
Perry, E., 1902: Descriptive Analyses of Piano Works (Philadelphia: Presser).
Protopopow, W., 1965-8: 'Polifonia w Balladzie F-Moll Chopina', Rocznik
Chopinowski, Vol. 7, pp.34-44.
Rawsthorne, A., 1966: 'Ballades, Fantasy and Scherzos', in Frederic Chopin:
Profiles of the Man and the Musician, ed. A. Walker (London: Barrie and
Rockliff), pp.42-72.
Rink, J., 1994: 'Authentic Chopin: History, Analysis and Intuition in
Performance', in Chopin Studies 2, ed. J. Rink and J. Samson (Cambridge:
CUP, forthcoming).
Samson, J., 1985: The Music of Chopin (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).
1992a: Chopin: The Four Ballades (Cambridge: CUP).
1992b: 'Extended Forms: The Ballades, Scherzos and Fantasies', in The
Cambridge Companion to Chopin, ed. J. Samson (Cambridge: CUP), pp.101-
23.
1994: 'Chopin Reception: Theory, History, Analysis', in Chopin Studies 2,
ed. J. Rink and J. Samson (Cambridge: CUP, forthcoming).
Schenker, H., 1979: Free Composition (Der freie Satz), 2 vols, trans. and ed.
E. Oster (New York: Longman).
Schumann, R., 1888: Gesammelte Schriften i2ber Musik und Musiker, 3 vols, ed.
H. Simon (Leipzig: Reclam).
Stein, E., 1962: Form and Performance (New York: Knopf).
Tarasti, E., 1989: 'Sur la narrativit6 dans les Ballades de Chopin'. Paper read at
Symposium on Chopin's Nocturnes, Scherzos and Ballades, Warsaw.
Wagner, G., 1976: Die Klavierballade um die Mitte des 19. Jahrhunderts (Munich:
Katzbichler).
Wilkowska, K., 1949: 'Srodki wyrazu emocjonalnego w Balladach Chopina',
Kwartalnik Muzyczny, Vol. 7, No. 28, pp.167-239.
Witten, D., 1979: 'The Chopin "Ballades": An Analytical Study' (D.M.A. Diss.,
Boston University).
Zolas, E., 1983: 'A Study and Recital of the Four Ballades of Frederick Chopin'
(D.Ed. Diss., Columbia University).