BS en Iso 22282-4-2012
BS en Iso 22282-4-2012
BS en Iso 22282-4-2012
National foreword
EUROPEAN STANDARD EN ISO 22282-4
NORME EUROPÉENNE
EUROPÄISCHE NORM June 2012
ICS 93.020
English Version
CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this European
Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration. Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references concerning such national
standards may be obtained on application to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre or to any CEN member.
This European Standard exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by translation
under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre has the same
status as the official versions.
CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland,
Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and United Kingdom.
© 2012 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. EN ISO 22282-4:2012: E
worldwide for CEN national Members.
BS EN ISO 22282-4:2012 EN ISO 22282-4:2012 (E)
Foreword
This document (EN ISO 22282-4:2012) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 341
“Geotechnical Investigation and Testing", the secretariat of which is held by ELOT, in collaboration with
Technical Committee ISO/TC 182 "Geotechnics".
This European Standard shall be given the status of a national standard, either by publication of an identical
text or by endorsement, at the latest by December 2012, and conflicting national standards shall be withdrawn
at the latest by December 2012.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent
rights. CEN [and/or CENELEC] shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
According to the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organisations of the following
countries are bound to implement this European Standard: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech
Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia,
Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain,
Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and the United Kingdom.
3
BS EN ISO 22282-4:2012
ISO 22282-4:2012(E)
Contents Page
Foreword ............................................................................................................................................................................ iv
1 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1
2 Normative references ......................................................................................................................................... 1
3 Terms, definitions and symbols ...................................................................................................................... 2
3.1 Terms and definitions ......................................................................................................................................... 2
3.2 Symbols ................................................................................................................................................................. 2
4 Equipment ............................................................................................................................................................. 2
5 Test procedure ..................................................................................................................................................... 3
5.1 Test preparation ................................................................................................................................................... 3
5.2 Arranging the disposal of discharge water .................................................................................................. 3
5.3 Executing and equipping the well................................................................................................................... 4
5.4 Executing and equipping the piezometers ................................................................................................... 6
5.5 Execution of the test........................................................................................................................................... 6
5.6 Uncertainty of measurement ............................................................................................................................ 9
5.7 Interruptions in pumping................................................................................................................................... 9
5.8 Decommissioning ............................................................................................................................................... 9
6 Test results ............................................................................................................................................................ 9
7 Reports ................................................................................................................................................................. 10
7.1 Field report .......................................................................................................................................................... 10
7.2 Test report ........................................................................................................................................................... 11
Annex A (informative) Record of measured values and test results of the pumping test — Example ..... 12
Annex B (informative) Determining the pumping test discharge ........................................................................ 14
Annex C (informative) Interpretation of the pumping test results....................................................................... 18
Bibliography ..................................................................................................................................................................... 25
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards bodies
(ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through ISO
technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been
established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, governmental and
non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the International
Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization.
International Standards are drafted in accordance with the rules given in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2.
The main task of technical committees is to prepare International Standards. Draft International Standards
adopted by the technical committees are circulated to the member bodies for voting. Publication as an
International Standard requires approval by at least 75 % of the member bodies casting a vote.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent
rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
ISO 22282-4 was prepared by the European Committee for Standardization (CEN) Technical Committee
CEN/TC 341, Geotechnical investigation and testing, in collaboration with Technical Committee ISO/TC 182,
Geotechnics, Subcommittee SC 1, Geotechnical investigation and testing, in accordance with the Agreement
on technical cooperation between ISO and CEN (Vienna Agreement).
ISO 22282 consists of the following parts, under the general title Geotechnical investigation and testing —
Geohydraulic testing:
Part 4:
Pumping tests
1 Scope
This part of ISO 22282 establishes requirements for pumping tests as part of geotechnical investigation service
in accordance with EN 1997-1 and EN 1997-2.
— drawing down the piezometric surface of the groundwater by pumping from a well (the test well);
— measuring the pumped discharge and the water level in the test well and piezometers, before, during and
after pumping, as a function of time.
This part of ISO 22282 applies to pumping tests performed on aquifers whose permeability is such that
pumping from a well can create a lowering of the piezometric head within hours or days depending on the
ground conditions and the purpose. It covers pumping tests carried out in soils and rock.
The tests concerned by this part of ISO 22282 are those intended for evaluating the hydrodynamic parameters
of an aquifer and well parameters, such as:
— skin effect,
— well storage,
2 Normative references
The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this document. For dated
references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document
(including any amendments) applies
ISO 14688-1, Geotechnical investigation and testing — Identification and classification of soil — Part 1:
Identification and description
ISO 14689-1, Geotechnical investigation and testing — Identification and classification of rock — Part 1:
Identification and description
ISO 22282-1, Geotechnical investigation and testing — Geohydraulic testing — General rules
ISO 22475-1, Geotechnical investigation and testing — Sampling methods and groundwater measurements —
Part 1: Technical principles for execution
3.1.1
radius of influence of pumping
R(t)
distance, measured from the axis of the well, beyond which the lowering of the piezometric surface of the
groundwater is nil
3.2 Symbols
4 Equipment
Conducting a pumping test requires the following equipment and instruments:
b) a pump and associated pipework capable of pumping from the test well. The pumps shall be equipped with
a suitably long discharge pipe so that the water from the pump is discharged sufficiently far away so that it
does not affect the test area. The capacity of the pump shall be sufficient to extract from the well a discharge
at least equal to that corresponding to that estimated to achieve the maximum planned drawdown;
NOTE Pumping tests are commonly carried out using electric submersible pumps, installed within the test well.
However, depending on conditions, pumping tests can also be carried out using suction pumps located at the surface,
airlift equipment, or special dewatering equipment such as wellpoints or eductors.
c) a system for regulating and measuring the discharge (m3/s). Devices for measuring the discharge rate
shall be suitably calibrated and shall be accurate for a range of flow rates anticipated during the test;
d) a system for measuring the water level in the test well and piezometers. The turbulence in the test well
caused by pumping shall be considered; the devices shall be capable of measuring water levels over the
range of drawdowns anticipated during the test;
5 Test procedure
5.1.1 General
When preparing a pumping test, there are a number of things to investigate and consider in advance, such as:
— basic information on the ground and groundwater conditions according to ISO 22282-1;
— the required drawdown and/or the required discharge rate during the test;
— the discharge point for the pumped water and its location relative to the test well;
The discharge rate Qd must be estimated to ensure that the test well can yield sufficient water, to allow a pump of
appropriate capacity to be selected, and to ensure that the discharge can be accepted at the agreed disposal point.
The discharge rate can be estimated by one or more of the following methods:
— by theoretical assessment of the well capacity, according to the method described in Annex B;
— by analysis of information from the preliminary pumping phase, according to the method described in Annex B.
If the discharge water is not disposed of via an engineered sewer network, it shall be disposed of at sufficient
distance from the test well that it will not have a significant impact on the observed pattern of groundwater lowering.
The test well shall be designed to satisfy the following criteria (see Figure 1):
— of sufficient depth to penetrate below the groundwater level in the strata of interest. If the test well does not
fully penetrate the aquifer, it shall penetrate the saturated part of the aquifer to a depth of at least 25 times
the well screen diameter with a minimum of 3 m;
— of sufficient drilled diameter to accommodate the necessary filter materials and well screen of sufficient
diameter to accommodate pumping equipment of adequate capacity to achieve the required discharge rate;
— with sufficient length and capacity of well screen to ensure that the required discharge rate can be achieved;
— to have appropriate filter material to ensure that the discharge water contains an acceptably low sediment
content to avoid the risk of pump damage and ground settlement as a result of the removal of fine particles
from the soil. Where the well is constructed in a stable rock, it may be possible to construct a test well
without the need for filter material.
The filter material shall be a highly permeable granular material of closely controlled particle size, and be
formed of grains of inert minerals in relation to the aquifer groundwater chemistry (e.g. quartz, feldspar). In
granular soils, the filter’s grading curve shall satisfy the double inequality:
where dN designates the characteristic size of the filter or of the ground in place, such that the mass of the soil
fraction passing through a sieve with a square mesh of side d represents N % of the total mass of material.
In fine grained soils or where the well screen is equipped with a geotextile mesh designed to act as a filter, the
filter material’s purpose is to backfill the annular space between the outside of the well screen and the borehole
wall. In those circumstances the filter media should be highly permeable coarse sand or fine gravel, with a
permeability coefficient at least 100 times that of the soil or rock being tested.
The thickness of the annular space for the filter pack shall be at least 50 mm. The inner diameter of the test well
shall be selected according to the purpose.
Key
1 well screen (slotted tube)
2 filter material (filter pack)
3 submersible pump
4 borehole casing
5 tube for measuring the water level
6 sealing plug
7 plain tube
8 device for measuring the water level
9 base of the screen
L filter length
D drilled diameter of the well
The test well shall be constructed in a similar way to piezometers in accordance with ISO 22475-1. Great care
shall be taken when installing the well materials. Particular attention shall be paid to the following:
— The well screen shall be lowered into the borehole to the specified level and shall be installed centrally in
the well, with the top and bottom of the screen located at the design level. Care shall be taken that the joints
of the screen and casing do not leak, and that the screen and casing are installed vertically and straight.
— If necessary, filter material shall be inserted in the annular space between the screen and the temporary
casing (or borehole wall). The filter material shall be placed progressively in stages to reduce the risk of a
blockage in the annular space. The filter material shall preferably be placed via a tremie pipe.
— If necessary, a sealing plug of low permeability material (such as bentonite) shall be created in the annular
space between the borehole wall and the well casing immediately above the filter material. The purpose of
the sealing plug is to prevent infiltration of surface water, or water from other aquifers, into the well screen.
Prior to the pumping test the well shall be developed to increase the permeability of the soil around the shell
by washing, and to remove any drilling residues and mobile soil particles that could be entrained by the water
flow into the well. Such particles could clog the filter and damage the test pump.
Development shall be carried out by means of pumping. Possible methods include airlifting or pumping using a
robust pump that is not damaged by the presence of particles in the discharge water. If airlift pumping is used,
care shall be taken to avoid injecting air into the ground, as air bubbles in the ground can affect the permeability.
Other methods for well development may be used in combination with pumping, including:
— surging or swabbing inside the well screen to induce water flow into and out of the well;
The piezometer tubes shall be installed at such a depth that the influence of the test well can be observed and
recorded adequately. Where possible, the piezometer closest to the test well shall be located at the same depth
as the bottom of the test well.
Before commencement of the test, piezometers shall be cleaned in accordance with ISO 22475-1. The water level
in the piezometers shall be measured for a period before and after the test in order to find any natural variations
in the groundwater level. Their response time shall be checked by watching the water rise in the piezometer tube.
The period of monitoring depends on the nature of the aquifer and the purpose of the pumping test.
5.5.1 General
— a preliminary pumping phase to determine the discharge from the pumping test;
Prior to commencement of the pumping phase of the test, water levels in the test well and piezometers shall be
monitored to determine natural groundwater levels.
NOTE The duration of the pre-pumping phase depends on the purpose of the test and local conditions. Typical
durations of pre-pumping monitoring are between one day and ten days. Longer periods of pre-pumping monitoring are
necessary when groundwater levels are subject to tidal or other variations.
Prior to the main pumping test a short period of pumping shall be carried out to test the equipment.
NOTE Suitable durations for the equipment test are between 15 min and 2 h.
During the preliminary pumping phase the correct functioning of pumps, control systems, valves, flow
measurement devices and water level measurement devices shall be checked. Discharge pipe work shall
be checked for leaks. Any corrective action deemed necessary shall be taken prior to commencement of the
pumping test.
For large-scale or complex pumping tests, the preliminary pumping phase can be used to provide information
on discharge rate and drawdown to assist in determination of discharge rate for the pumping test (see Annex B).
The pumping test shall not be started until water levels in the test well and the piezometers have stabilized
following the preliminary pumping phase.
— a variable rate test. This type of test involves pumping the test well in a step-wise fashion, either increasing
or decreasing, up to the maximum capacity of the test well or the pump. A variable rate test can be used
to assist in determination of the discharge rate for a constant rate test;
and/or
— a constant rate test. This type of test involves pumping the test well at a constant rate for the duration on the test.
If the pumping test comprises a variable rate test followed by a constant rate test, there may be a period of
post pumping monitoring following the end of the variable rate test. In this case, the period between the end of
the variable rate test and the beginning of the constant rate test should be long enough to allow water levels
to stabilize.
Whenever the discharge is started or changed, the change in pumping rate shall be carried out rapidly. At the
start of the pumping test the discharge rate shall be stabilized within 2 min after starting the pumping.
During the pumping test measurements of water level shall be made according to the requirements of the
purpose of the test and the ground conditions. In general, measurements shall be taken more frequently at the
start of the pumping test, or when flow rate has been changed during a variable rate test, when water levels are
likely to be changing rapidly. During the later stages of a pumping test, when water levels are changing more
slowly, readings can be taken less frequently.
The following time increments between readings should be used unless alternative time increments can be
justified based on the purpose of the test and the ground conditions. If the groundwater levels in the test well
and piezometers are likely to continue to change at a significant rate, it may be necessary to take readings
more frequently than the guidelines below:
— ≤ 30 s for t ≤ 5 min;
— ≤ 30 min for t = 1 h to 4 h;
— ≤ 1 h for t > 4 h.
Where a pumping test is carried out in conditions where groundwater is subject to tidal variations, water
level readings shall be taken at frequent intervals throughout the test duration. In tidal conditions the interval
between readings should not exceed 15 min.
The pump discharge shall be measured at least four times in the first hour. If the discharge is stable, the discharge
can be measured once a day. If the discharge is not stable, the pump discharge shall be determined each hour.
Levels of open water bodies in the vicinity of the test site, where variation is likely to interfere with the pumping
test (and vice versa), shall be recorded periodically throughout the test.
Pumping shall be continued until the end of the specified pump test period or, if the test is required to achieve
steady-state conditions, until three successive readings, spaced at least 1 h apart, of the water levels in the
piezometers do not differ from one another by more than 1 cm.
When pumping is stopped at the end of the pumping phase, post-pumping monitoring shall commence. During
this phase, the water levels in the well and piezometers shall be recorded. Starting from the beginning of the
post-pumping phase, the intervals between readings should be the same as during the pumping phase.
The duration of the post-pumping phase will depend on the purpose of the test and the local conditions. Unless
justified by the purpose of the test and the ground conditions, monitoring time shall be at least equal to the
duration of decreasing groundwater levels in the pumping phase, or until three successive readings, spaced at
least 1 h apart, do not differ from one another by more than 1 cm.
Once readings are less frequent, the pumping equipment may be removed by keeping the monitoring equipment
in operation, provided that monitoring is not disturbed.
— 1 s for time or 1 % of the time increment, whatever gives the greater value;
— 1 cm for levels;
If mechanical breakdown or other problems cause interruption to pumping during a variable rate test or during
the first 24 h of a constant discharge rate test, the test shall be abandoned. Groundwater levels shall be allowed
to recover and the test restarted from t = 0 for a constant rate test, or from the start of the previous step for a
variable rate test.
Once a constant rate test has been in progress for more than 24 h, interruptions in pumping of up to 1 hr may
be acceptable depending on the purpose of the test, although any interruptions in pumping should be kept to
an absolute minimum.
5.8 Decommissioning
After the test has been completed, the pumping and monitoring equipment shall be removed. The test well and
piezometers shall be locked, backfilled or grouted up according to ISO 22475-1.
6 Test results
The principal test results are:
— drawdown and recovery of water levels in the test well and piezometer as a function of time;
The test results can be used to evaluate aquifer properties (including permeability, transmissivity, storage
coefficient) and the performance parameters of the test well.
For constant rate tests, analyses can be either steady-state or transient-state. Steady-state analyses are
relatively simple to apply, but do not allow storage coefficients to be determined. Transient-state analyses are
more complex, but allow a wider range of parameters to be determined.
The most common methods of analysis of test results are described in Annex C.
7 Reports
7.1.1 General
At the project site, a field report shall be completed. This field report shall consist of the following, if applicable:
e) record of identification and description of soil and rock according to ISO 14688-1 and ISO 14689-1;
h) decommissioning record;
All field investigations shall be reported such that third persons are able to check and understand the results.
The installation record shall be attached to the summary log and include the following essential information,
if applicable:
a) type of equipment;
b) test well;
c) piezometers;
d) pumps;
The record of measured values and test results shall be attached to the summary log and include the following
essential information, if applicable (see also Annex A):
g) elevation of the water and its depth in the well before the start of pumping;
h) a table showing, in terms of elapsed time since the beginning of the test, the discharge rates and the water
levels measured in the well and in each piezometer;
Annex A
(informative)
Record of measured values and test results of the pumping test — Example
REPORT: Pumping test Variable rate discharge test conducted according to ISO 22282-4
Enterprise: Qd = m3/s Date: File No.:
Q1 = m3/s
Test operator: Start time: Site:
Q2 = m3/s
Q3 = m3/s Test well: Bottom: screen Top: screen
Q4 = m3/s
STEP No. t min 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4 4,5 5 6 7 8 9
TEST WELL h m
Dh m
Q m3/s
t min 10 11 12 13 14 15 20 25 30 40 50 60 90 120
TEST WELL h m
Dh m
Q m3/s
STEP No. t min 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4 4,5 5 6 7 8 9
TEST WELL h m
Dh m
Q m3/s
t min 10 11 12 13 14 15 20 25 30 40 50 60 90 120
TEST WELL h m
Dh m
Q m3/s
STEP No. t min 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4 4,5 5 6 7 8 9
TEST WELL h m
Dh m
Q m3/s
t min 10 11 12 13 14 15 20 25 30 40 50 60 90 120
TEST WELL h m
Dh m
Q m3/s
STEP No. t min 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4 4,5 5 6 7 8 9
TEST WELL h m
Dh m
Q m3/s
t min 10 11 12 13 14 15 20 25 30 40 50 60 90 120
TEST WELL h m
Dh m
Q m3/s
Annex B
(informative)
B.1 General
The discharge rate Qd should be estimated to ensure that the test well can yield sufficient water, to allow a
pump of appropriate capacity to be selected, and to ensure that the discharge can be accepted at the agreed
disposal point.
The discharge rate can be estimated by one or more of the following methods:
— by theoretical assessment of the well capacity, according to the method described in this annex;
— by analysis of information from the preliminary pumping phase, according to the method described in this
annex.
Qd
v= (B.1)
π DL
— the depth of water above the pump inlet is more than 0,5 m;
— the drawdown for a discharge of 0,2 Qd can be accurately measured using the equipment proposed.
B.3.1 General
To determine the appropriate discharge rate to be used in the pumping test a preliminary pumping phase can
be carried out.
Dh = aQ2 + bQ (B.2)
The coefficients a and b are calculated from the data collected during the preliminary pumping phase.
The discharges selected for the four steps are a function of the maximum discharge rate that can be obtained
from the well Qd and are such that:
For each step, the water level in the well is measured at least every 5 min during the first 30 min, and then every
10 min thereafter.
During the first pumping step at discharge Q1, the specific drawdown (Dh/Q) of the water level in the well as a
function of time allows us to calculate:
— the slope α of the tangent to the curve giving the specific drawdown plotted against log10 of time, for a
pumping maintained for 2 h;
— the specific drawdown c = (Dh/Q1)(48 hr) for pumping at discharge Q1 whose duration has been extrapolated
logarithmically to 48 h.
For the other steps, Dh′i is the drawdown extrapolated for discharges Qi maintained constant for 2 h. It is
determined as follows:
— for the step at discharge Q2 having produced a drawdown Dh2 at the end of 1 h:
— for the step at discharge Q3 having produced a drawdown Dh3 at the end of 1 h:
— for the step at discharge Q4 having produced a drawdown Dh4 at the end of 1 h:
where
α is as determined in B.3.3;
b is the ordinate at the start of the straight line passing through the point with coordinates (Q1, C).
See Figure B.2.
Key
1 well axis
Figure B.2 — Determination of coefficients a and b of the characteristic drawdown curve in the well
during the preliminary test
where Dhf is the target drawdown for the end of the test.
For a well that has penetrated an aquifer whose unconfined groundwater surface at rest lies at a height e above
the bottom of the well, Dhf ≤ e/3.
For a well in an aquifer with confined groundwater, Dhf is the final drawdown that brings the water level in the
well no lower than 0,5 m above the level of the top of the aquifer, such that in general Dhf ≤ e/3. The drawdown
shall always leave water in the well to a height of at least 0,5 m above the upper part of the screen.
Annex C
(informative)
C.2.1 General
Steady-state is defined as the condition, in the later stages of a pumping test, when groundwater levels remain
constant, or vary so slowly as to be effectively constant.
The interpretation methods presented in this section are based upon (among other things) the following
basic assumptions:
— homogenous and isotropic aquifer of constant thickness and infinite horizontal extent;
In cases of significant difference to the above-mentioned simplifying conditions, corrections should be made
according to the literature.
C.2.2.1 General
Key
1 static water level
2 equilibrium water level
3 confined aquifer
In the case of an aquifer confined at the top and bottom (Figure C.1), transmissivity can be computed according
to the solution of Thiem.
Q r
T = ln 2 (C.1)
2π ( h2 − h1 ) r1
where
The permeability coefficient k (in m/s) can be determined from k = T/d where d is the thickness of the aquifer (in m).
— drawdown in each observation well is to be plotted against its distance from the test well on semi-logarithmic
axes as shown in Figure C.2.
— Ds is the change in drawdown per log cycle of distance from the test well, is determined from the graphical
plot and is substituted in Equation (C.2) below:
2, 30 Q
T = (C.2)
2π∆s
where
Key
1 static water level
2 equilibrium water level
3 unconfined aquifer
Q r
k= ln 2 (C.3)
2
2π ( h2 − h12 ) r1
where
The graphical solution presented in C.2.2.1 can also be used for the unconfined aquifer, with the reservation
that the Dupuit formula fails to give an accurate description of the drawdown curve near the well, where the
horizontal flow conditions (that are an implicit assumption of the method) are not present.
C.3.1 General
Transient-state is defined as the condition, in the early stages of the pumping phase of a test, where groundwater
levels are falling. The rate of fall will change as pumping continues. Alternatively, during the post-pumping
phase, the transient-state is when water levels are rising.
Q
s= W (u ) (C.4)
4π T
where
r 2S
u= (C.5)
4Tt
and where
s is the drawdown, in m;
W(u) is the Theis well function (tabulated values are given in [4]);
The permeability coefficient k (in m/s) can be determined from k = T/d where d is the thickness of the aquifer (in m).
The analysis requires that the values of s for the piezometer be plotted against r2 /t on logarithmic axes
(Figure C.4). A type curve of W(u) from published sources (such as [x]) is then plotted on logarithmic axes of
the same scale as the piezometer data. The type curve and the piezometer data are then superimposed, and
adjusted relative to each other until most of the piezometer data overlie and match with the type curve.
An arbitrary match point is selected from within the area where the piezometer data overlie the type curve, and
the co-ordinates of the match point are recorded. The values of W(u), u, s and r2 /t so determined are substituted
into the equations above. This allows T, S and k to be determined.
r 2S
u= ≤ 0, 01 (C.6)
4Tt
This condition is typically satisfied in confined aquifers when pumping has continued for more than a few hours.
The Cooper-Jacob method can be applied to both the change in drawdown with elapsed time since pumping
began, or to change in drawdown with distance from the test well.
Analysis of time drawdown data requires that drawdown data for each piezometer be plotted against time on
semi-logarithmic axes (Figure C.5). The main part of the data should plot as a straight line. A value for Ds, the
change in drawdown per log cycle of time, is obtained from the straight line portion of the data. A value for to,
the zero drawdown intercept, is obtained by extrapolating the straight line back to the zero drawdown axis.
Values are then substituted into the following equations:
2, 3Q
k= (C.7)
4π∆sD
2, 25 kdt o
S= (C.8)
r2
where
NOTE Although time is given in seconds in the above equations, it is convenient to plot t in minutes on the drawdown-
time semi-logarithmic graph (see Figure C.5).
Analysis of distance drawdown data requires that drawdown at each piezometer at the same particular time t
be plotted against radial distance from the test well r on semi-logarithmic axes (Figure C.5). The data should
plot as a straight line. A value for Ds, the change in drawdown per log cycle of distance, is obtained from the
straight line. A value for ro, the zero drawdown intercept, is obtained by extrapolating the straight line to the
zero drawdown axis. Values are then substituted into the following equations:
2, 3 Q
k= (C.9)
2π∆sd
2, 25 kdt
S= (C.10)
ro2
where
More complex methods of analysis are required for unconfined aquifers with significant drawdowns, for wells
with only limited penetration into the aquifer, for aquifers where water is released slowly from storage (delayed
yield) or for where water can pass into the aquifer from adjoining low permeability aquitards (leaky aquifers).
Methods of analysis for these conditions can be found in the Bibliography.
Bibliography
[2] EN 1997-2, Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design — Part 2: Ground investigation and testing
[3] Kruseman, G.P. and De riDDer, N.A. (1990). Analysis and Evaluation of Pumping Test Data.
International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement, Publication 47, 2nd edition. Wageningen,
The Netherlands
[4] Theis, C.V. (1935). The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and
duration of discharge of a well using groundwater storage. Transactions of the American Geophysical
Union, 16, pp. 519-524
[5] Cooper, H.H. and JaCob, C.E. (1946). A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants
and summarizing wellfield history. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 27, pp. 526-534
[6] DrisColl, F.G. (1986). Groundwater and Wells. Johnson Division, St Paul, Minnesota
[7] GeneTier, B. (1992), La pratique des pompages d’essai en hydrogéologie. Manuels et méthodes n° 9,
Editions BRGM, Orléans, France
About us Revisions
We bring together business, industry, government, consumers, innovators Our British Standards and other publications are updated by amendment or revision.
and others to shape their combined experience and expertise into standards We continually improve the quality of our products and services to benefit your
-based solutions. business. If you find an inaccuracy or ambiguity within a British Standard or other
The knowledge embodied in our standards has been carefully assembled in BSI publication please inform the Knowledge Centre.
a dependable format and refined through our open consultation process.
Organizations of all sizes and across all sectors choose standards to help Copyright
them achieve their goals. All the data, software and documentation set out in all British Standards and
other BSI publications are the property of and copyrighted by BSI, or some person
Information on standards or entity that owns copyright in the information used (such as the international
We can provide you with the knowledge that your organization needs standardization bodies) and has formally licensed such information to BSI for
to succeed. Find out more about British Standards by visiting our website at commercial publication and use. Except as permitted under the Copyright, Designs
bsigroup.com/standards or contacting our Customer Services team or and Patents Act 1988 no extract may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system
Knowledge Centre. or transmitted in any form or by any means – electronic, photocopying, recording
or otherwise – without prior written permission from BSI. Details and advice can
Buying standards be obtained from the Copyright & Licensing Department.
You can buy and download PDF versions of BSI publications, including British
and adopted European and international standards, through our website at Useful Contacts:
bsigroup.com/shop, where hard copies can also be purchased. Customer Services
If you need international and foreign standards from other Standards Development Tel: +44 845 086 9001
Organizations, hard copies can be ordered from our Customer Services team. Email (orders): [email protected]
Email (enquiries): [email protected]
Subscriptions
Subscriptions
Our range of subscription services are designed to make using standards
Tel: +44 845 086 9001
easier for you. For further information on our subscription products go to
Email: [email protected]
bsigroup.com/subscriptions.
With British Standards Online (BSOL) you’ll have instant access to over 55,000 Knowledge Centre
British and adopted European and international standards from your desktop. Tel: +44 20 8996 7004
It’s available 24/7 and is refreshed daily so you’ll always be up to date. Email: [email protected]
You can keep in touch with standards developments and receive substantial
Copyright & Licensing
discounts on the purchase price of standards, both in single copy and subscription
format, by becoming a BSI Subscribing Member. Tel: +44 20 8996 7070
Email: [email protected]
PLUS is an updating service exclusive to BSI Subscribing Members. You will
automatically receive the latest hard copy of your standards when they’re
revised or replaced.
To find out more about becoming a BSI Subscribing Member and the benefits
of membership, please visit bsigroup.com/shop.
With a Multi-User Network Licence (MUNL) you are able to host standards
publications on your intranet. Licences can cover as few or as many users as you
wish. With updates supplied as soon as they’re available, you can be sure your
documentation is current. For further information, email [email protected].