Bail
Bail
Bail
INTRODUCTION
The right to bail is a fundamental aspect of the criminal justice system, reflecting
the principle of presumption of innocence until proven guilty. In India, bail
jurisprudence has evolved significantly, yet it remains in dire need of reform. The
increasing number of undertrial prisoners and the arbitrariness in bail decisions
underscore the urgent need for a structured legislative framework. This dissertation
will explore the current judicial trends, the necessity for bail legislation, and the
implications of these changes on the justice system.
Bail jurisprudence in India lacks consistency and uniformity, with courts imposing
varying conditions on bail that often have little or no nexus with the intended good
administration of justice or the advancement of the trial process. The Supreme
Court has urged the Central government to consider introducing a bail legislation
to streamline the grant of bail, similar to the United Kingdom's Bail Act, 1976.
In recent years, the Supreme Court has made several observations and judgments
highlighting the need for bail reform in India. In the 2022 case of Satender Kumar
Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation, the Court urged the government to
consider introducing a bail legislation. In another case, Ms Y v. State of Rajasthan,
a bench headed by then Chief Justice of India NV Ramana deprecated the recent
trend of courts passing bail orders without underlining specific reasons.
Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud has attributed a sense of fear in trial court
judges to their reluctance to grant bail, contributing to the higher courts being
flooded with bail matters. The Supreme Court has also opined that it does not
believe in unnecessarily keeping people behind bars and lamented the lengthy
hearings and judgments plaguing bail applications.
The crisis of bail in India is dual: the judicial approach to general bail under the
CrPC has structurally disintegrated at the lower court level, and stringent
conditions under special laws such as the UAPA and PMLA have codified the
wide powers of agencies like the NIA and ED. The trend of casual and cryptic bail
orders by High Courts, lacking proper reasoning and consideration of substantial
factors, has led to an erosion of the progressive vision of bail in the highest court.
Statement of Purpose
Additionally, the judiciary must ensure that bail orders are granted after proper
consideration of substantial factors and with adequate reasoning recorded. This
would promote transparency, accountability, and fairness in the bail
system. Ultimately, the right to bail is a fundamental aspect of personal liberty, and
its effective implementation is crucial for a just and equitable criminal justice
system in India.
REVIEW OF LITERARURE
Carolyn Raphaely, 2013, Denying paraplegic bail is 'torture' In this News Article
The Reporter Carolyn Raphaely tried to bring in to the notice of general public that
how the Rich and Well known personalities can easily access to provisions of law
and the poor people are deprived of justice. In a case where a Paralympian
Olympian athlete Oscar Pistorius against whom the crime of murder has been
proved and he himself admitted that he shoot dead his girlfriend, was
realised/granted bail, with this we can understand that special treatment is given to
celebrity people.
Richard Williams, 2012, Bail or Jail Number of accused peoples not been
convicted of crime yet who are under trial are sitting in jails only because they
cannot afford bail. People who are kept in jails for simple offences like Theft,
Property or some of pity offences Which are of nonviolent nature Although many
are not considered a danger to the public or a society It is the basic right of every
person so arrested to be realised on bail prior to trial, a person can be realised on
bail by imposing certain conditions as may think fit by the Judge, it can include
posting the full bail amount, using property as collateral or signing a written
agreement to appear, referred to as release on your own recognizance.
Julie Stubbs, 2010, Re-examining Bail and Remand for young offenders in New
South Wales. The paper discusses the bail for young barely legal offenders. The
rise in number of crimes committed by young offenders and these offenders unable
to meet bail conditions. The paper says it is necessary that the Government of New
South Wales reviews its policy on bail. The number of prisoners must be reduced
and therefore more bails must be granted without harsh and costly conditions.
Objectives
To analyze the current state of bail jurisprudence in India and identify key
challenges.
Research Question
1. What are the existing legal frameworks governing bail in India, and how do
they compare to international standards?
2. What are the current trends in bail jurisprudence in India, and how can
legislative reforms enhance the effectiveness and fairness of the bail system?
3. What are the implications of arbitrary bail orders on the rights of the accused
and the integrity of the judicial system?
4. What legislative reforms are necessary to create a more equitable bail system
in India?
Hypothesis
The existing bail system in India is fraught with inconsistencies and arbitrariness,
which can be mitigated through comprehensive legislative reforms that standardize
bail conditions and enhance judicial accountability.
Research Methodology
To investigate the complex interplay between bail rights, legislative frameworks,
and judicial trends, a mixed-methods research approach will be employed,
encompassing both qualitative and quantitative analyses.
CHAPTERISATION
Chapter 1: Historical Background of Bail
Chapter 2: Legislative Framework Governing Bail in National and
International Legislation: A Comparative Analysis
Chapter 3: Judicial Trends in Bail Decisions
Chapter 4: Contemporary Issues and Challenges
Chapter 5: Recommendations for Reform: In this chapter, the
dissertation will propose recommendations for reforming bail laws and
practices. These recommendations will be based on the findings from
previous chapters
Bibliograpghy