Module MMW Problem Solving Midterm - 024441
Module MMW Problem Solving Midterm - 024441
2. DEVISING A PLAN
Second. Find the connection between the data and the unknown. You may be obliged to
consider auxiliary problems if an immediate connection cannot be found. You should
obtain eventually a plan of the solution.
Have you seen it before? Or have you seen the same problem in a slightly different form?
Do you know a related problem? Do you know a theorem that could be useful?
Look at the unknown! Try to think of a familiar problem having the same or a similar
unknown.
Here is a problem related to yours and solved before. Could you use it? Could you use its
result? Could you use its method? Should you introduce some auxiliary element in order
to make its use possible?
Could you restate the problem? Could you restate it still differently? Go back to
definitions.
If you cannot solve the proposed problem, try to solve first some related problem. Could
you imagine a more accessible related problem? A more general problem? A more special
problem? An analogous problem? Could you solve a part of the problem? Keep only a
part of the condition, drop the other part; how far is the unknown then determined, how
can it vary? Could you derive something useful from the data? Could you think of other
data appropriate to determine the unknown? Could you change the unknown or data, or
both if necessary, so that the new unknown and the new data are nearer to each other?
Did you use all the data? Did you use the whole condition? Have you taken into account
all essential notions involved in the problem?
4. LOOKING BACK
Fourth. Examine the solution obtained.
Can you check the result? Can you check the argument?
Can you derive the solution differently? Can you see it at a glance?
Can you use the result, or the method, for some other problem?
Scientific Approach
Another way of looking at the Problem Solving process is what might be called the scientific approach. We
show this in the diagram below.
Here the problem is given and initially the idea is to experiment with it or explore it in order
to get some feeling as to how to proceed. After a while it is hoped that the solver is able to make a
conjecture or guess what the answer might be. If the conjecture is true it might be possible to prove or
justify it. In that case the looking back process sets in and an effort is made to generalize or extend
the problem. In this case you have essentially chosen a new problem and so the whole process starts
over again.
Sometimes, however, the conjecture is wrong and so a counter-example is found. This is an
example that contradicts the conjecture. In that case another conjecture is sought and you have to
look for a proof or another counterexample.
Some problems are too hard so it is necessary to give up. Now you may give up so that you
can take a rest, in which case it is a ‘for now’ giving up. Actually this is a good problem solving
strategy. Often when you give up for a while your subconscious takes over and comes up with a good
idea that you can follow. On the other hand, some problems are so hard that you eventually have to
give up ‘for ever’. There have been many difficult problems throughout history that mathematicians
have had to give up on.
That then is a rough overview of what Problem Solving is all about. For simple problems the
four stage Pólya method and the scientific method can be followed through without any difficulty.
But when the problem is hard it often takes a lot of to-ing and fro-ing before the problem is finally
solved – if it ever is!