Sample Answers Part 3
Sample Answers Part 3
Q. 2: How has the size of the family changed in the last few decades in your country?
Answer: From my experience, I can say that my grandfather had an extended family and
people at that time used to live together with close relatives. As far as I have heard, their
forefathers also live in a joint family and the number of family members was sometimes
more than twenty. However, the trend of living in an extended family has changed
remarkably in cities where most of the families are nuclear in nature. The villages in my
country still have large families who live together but the number is shrinking day by day.
Q. 5: Who do you think should be responsible for the care of the elderly, the family or the
government?
Answer: I believe the family has the major responsibility to look after their elder family
members and support them personally as they did in their youth age. These senior citizens
have sacrificed a lot throughout their lives to form a family and then to make them happy.
The young members should do everything in their power to accompany their elder members
and provide them with their necessities.
Having said that, the government has some responsibilities as well. These elder members
were once taxpayers and thus they deserve healthcare, entertainment and other facilities
from the state.
Q. 2. Who is best at advising young people about choosing a job: teachers or parents?
Answer: In my humble opinion, teachers are best at advising young people about choosing a
job primarily because they are usually the ones who work tirelessly at schools and colleges
to unlock the potentials of young adults. Besides, through the continuous interaction with
their students in classes, it is the teachers who are better positioned to identify the skills and
expertise of the young people and thus being able to guide them to choose careers that are
suitable for them.
Q. 6. Could you recommend some effective strategies for governments and employers to
ensure people have a good work-life balance?
Answer: Governments and employers can do several things to ensure a good work-life
balance for the employees. First, employers can offer “flexibility” with work schedules,
whenever possible, so that the employees can have little time to spend with their families
and friends in between the work hours. Employers can also allow some “unpaid time off”
(not getting paid for the off days) so that their staffs can attend some fun and family events.
As for the governments, they can create awareness among people by using different media
outlets in order to highlight the benefits of a good work-life balance. Governments can also
arrange for an “annual award” option for the companies/employers who actively work to
promote “work-life” balance among their employees.
Q. 6. The money professional sportsmen earn is significantly higher than that the earning
of other professionals. Is it justified?
Answer: I think a very few fortunate sports celebrities earn a hefty amount of money while
most others do not. Considering the training, dedication, challenge and sacrifice that are
part of their lives, the earning, in my opinion, is justified. We have to keep in mind that their
career is short spanned and they earn because they perform really well. The payment to
those celebrities is high because people buy tickets when they perform and different
companies that earn millions of dollars each day want them as brand ambassadors. Since
these payments are legit and transparent, I do not see any problem if they earn a lot.
Q. 2: Do you think an area can benefit from having an interesting historic place locally? In
what way?
Answer: Definitely an area with an interesting historic place can reap the benefits from
different perspectives. First, such a place would attract a huge number of tourists and help
grow different local businesses. Besides, such areas are strategically important for the local
government and it can bring more development projects to the area. The government takes
extra measures to protect such areas from natural disasters and thus get more attention. On
top of that, the flourishing tourism of the area spreads the local custom and tradition to
other parts of the country. Thus the development of such a region occurs faster than other
areas.
Q. 3. What do you think will happen to historic places or buildings in the future? Why?
Answer: That is hard to tell and all would depend on the future generation. If they feel that
such locations and buildings are worth preserving, the authority would take steps to protect
them. Otherwise, many of them, which are less internationally known, would disappear and
would be converted to ultramodern commercial buildings. Prominent sites, on the other
hand, would be preserved as they will attract many international tourists. Some of them will
be debilitated due to the lack of maintenance and a few new ones would emerge as historic
places and buildings in the distant future. The main reason some of the historic places and
building will disappear is that they are less popular and can't sell tickets to tourists. So the
authority or the owner would like to convert them for business purpose. The urbanisation,
pollution and the need for more buildings for the increasing population are threats to such
historic sites.
Q. 5: Are there other ways people can learn about history, apart from at school? How?
Answer: I believe reading about history and researching them online is the best way to learn
more about it. What we learn about history in our school is just the beginning. To truly
explore the past, we need to read a lot of books and the book choices should be based on
the interests of the readers. The Intenet is an amazing tool that can help us learn about our
past and the interactive videos found on different websites are truly helpful. It offers us to
dive deeper into history. Finally, travelling is an excellent way to learn about the world we
live in and how this world was shaped by different civilisations. Someone who travels
extensively learns about history faster and witness history instead of assuming them.
Q. 6: Do you think history will still be a school subject in the future? Why?
Answer: I believe history is not merely a collection of past events, stories of civilisations and
powerful characters. It is rather a way to look at the future. Thus the importance of history
in the future will increase and more students would be interested to learn about it than
today. We are yet to comprehend the full potential of history and it is still frowned upon as a
subject for weaker students. But in the future, we will realise how important it is for people
to learn it for a prosperous future. So I do not see any reasons history will disappear from
the school syllabus.
1. What kinds of things do people write online reviews about in your country?
2. Why do some people write online reviews?
3. Do you think that online reviews are good for both shoppers and companies?
4. What do you think it might be like to work in a customer service job?
5. Do you agree that customers are more likely to complain nowadays?
6. How important is it for companies to take all customer complaints seriously?
Q. 1: What kinds of things do people write online reviews about in your country?
Answer: Online review is a rather widespread thing in my country these days since buying
and selling all sorts of things online is becoming popular. But, generally speaking, people in
my country like to make online reviews, mostly on things like what they eat at a restaurant,
and what kinds of clothing or fashionable items they buy online. Many a time, these days,
we also see online reviews on the many grocery items that we buy on a regular basis. So, it is
pretty much all kinds of things – things that are sold both online and offline - on which
people leave their online reviews.
Q. 3: Do you think that online reviews are good for both shoppers and companies?
Answer: Yes, I have no doubt in my mind that online reviews are good for both shoppers and
companies alike. Talking from the point of view of shoppers, online reviews allow them to
either encourage or warn their fellow shoppers about what to buy and what not to buy
online. Now, as for the companies, such online reviews allow the companies to adjust their
business strategies and policies according to the wishes and demands of their current and
prospective customers – a business practice which, in turn, can help these companies boost
their sales and revenue.
Q. 4: What do you think it might be like to work in a customer service job?
Answer: Well, from what I have seen or experienced so far, all I can say is that the customer
service job is a rather challenging profession since it involves continuous talking or
engagement with people – people who have all kinds of different views, ideas, tastes,
preferences, culture, backgrounds and lifestyles. And that’s exactly why one has to be really
upbeat and resourceful if he/she wants to deal with these different kinds of people
smoothly. Otherwise, these types of jobs can be very tiring, if not annoying and frustrating,
most of the time, instead of actually being rewarding.
1. Do you think the cinema has increased or decreased in popularity in recent years?
2. In your opinion, will this trend continue in the future?
3. What are the advantages and disadvantages of making films of real-life events?
4. How important do you think it is for a filmmaker to remain true to the original story?
5. Should films and television be censored or should we be free to choose what we see?
6. How do you think censorship laws will change in the next 20 years?
Q. 1: Do you think the cinema has increased or decreased in popularity in recent years?
Answer: That's a bit complex issue as the answer might seem paradoxical. Well, I heartily
believe that more people enjoy movies today than ever before but most of them do not go
to a movie theatre to enjoy a movie. Thus the cinema halls have lost their glorious days,
especially in my country, but an increasing number of people make time to watch movies
either on TVs or on their computers. Gone are the days when my parents used to take me to
a movie theatre and that was once in a while. These days we enjoy more than 3-4 movies a
week but do not go to a cinema hall at all. I believe the popularity of international movies,
low-quality local movies and amenities to get great movie-viewing experience at home are
the reasons for this shifting trend.
Q. 3: What are the advantages and disadvantages of making films of real-life events?
Answer: Among the advantages, I assume, those movies have a ready-made plot, the
storylines are already popular and the producer can think of characters easily. Such movies
often win awards considering their historical values and are positively taken by the audience
and critics.
However, there are some drawbacks in making such movies based on real-life events. First
and foremost, people and critics scrutinise such movies more thoroughly and they are often
subject to controversy. Secondly, the story is already known to people and the movie has to
promise something more than its storyline. Furthermore, making such movies require a huge
sum of money and they often end up poorly in the box office.
Q. 4: How important do you think it is for a filmmaker to remain true to the original story?
Answer: I believe true facts from history should be intact in a movie and every filmmaker
should adhere to the truth as much as possible while making a movie based on a real-life
event or a prominent historical figure. Otherwise, the film would end up receiving
resentments and negative criticism from ordinary viewers as well as from movie critics.
Sometimes, a filmmaker needs to add some surprises and twists to make such a movie more
appealing but they can always do so by not distorting the main facts. We should keep in
mind that children who watch such movies often take them as evidence of real events from
history. So such movies should not misrepresent history and invite controversy.
Q. 5: Should films and television be censored or should we be free to choose what we see?
Answer: I believe some sort of censorship is required in the TV and film industry so that we
can enjoy movies and watch TV programmes without embarrassments and getting offended.
For instance, if I start watching a movie with my parents and the film has too many sensual
and violent scenes, we would feel embarrassed. Since movies have a major impact on the
viewers' mind, we should not allow too much violence, hatred and offensive scenes to be
shown. However, I also believe that creative artists should be allowed to express their
feelings and thoughts through these media. Hence, too much tight censorship, that we see in
some countries, is not desirable as well. We, as adults, might often choose what we want to
watch but we should always monitor what our youngsters are watching for their own good.
Q. 6: How do you think censorship laws will change in the next 20 years?
Answer: Well, that's a tough question to answer, but I will nevertheless try! In my opinion,
after two decades or so, some first world countries, where censorship laws are too much
flexible, would find themselves amending laws to make it more a bit rigid. While an opposite
approach would be taken in developing countries to give more freedom to creative artists.
All countries, in my opinion, will try to make a balance in censorship laws to make it more
friendly and helpful to the viewers.
Q. 3: Has travel become safer in recent years than that was in the past?
Answer: Some people would say that accidents and casualties are higher in modern time
than in the past. But I believe that travelling in recent years has significantly improved and
offers more convenience to commuters. We see more accidents these days because they all
are being reported in the news unlike the past when we could hear about only major
accidents. In recent days, we have more strict traffic rules, acute safety measures including
biometric checking, and modern transportations which are built considering safety in mind.
Rigid airport rules make terrorist attacks almost impossible.
A typical train station in my country has more than 15 train schedules and they carry
thousands of passengers each day. Such a station used to have only three to four trains a
day. If we consider the number of vehicles and commuters with that of the past, we would
get a real picture of road safety, which I believe has advanced in recent days.
Among the demerits, increasing flights are responsible for air pollution. Cheap air travel
attracts more passengers and thus they indirectly contribute to air pollution. Moreover, low-
cost air tickets do not ensure desirable comfort and amenities which people often regret.
Food and drinks in such a journey are unreasonably expensive and it often includes hidden
fees and charges.
After 30 or 40 years, our cars would be able to fly short-distance and even run on the river,
much like a science-fiction vehicle. After 50 years or so, we will have flying cars that will take
us to our offices and the software instead of human will drive those cars. After a century
later, we will have personal pods of SkyTran carrier that would use the airways rather than
moving on a road. After a few centuries later, who knows, we might even teleport straight to
our destination from our home!
Q. 6: Should the government in a country focus more on rail transports or road transports?
Why?
Answer: I believe the decision should be made based on the geological condition, existing
infrastructure, population and economic condition of the country. For instance, if a country
has mostly hilly tracks and rivers, developing rail tracks is both challenging and expensive.
For such countries, connecting highways and road transports are more practical and cost-
effective. Moreover, if the country does not have enough rail tracks already, it should focus
on developing and enhancing roads rather than rails. Finally, countries with higher
population should consider developing their railroads as it can carry a great number of
people at a time. Whether to invest in road or rail transportation, thus, should be made
based on a number of factors rather than a single one.
Q. 5: How should students spend their summer vacations? How do/did you spend it?
Answer: I personally feel that long vacations should be spent wisely. Since students have
more than two months during their summer vacations, they should plan prior to the
vacation to make the best out of it. They can travel for one to two weeks, get involved in
some sort of paid job to gain some practical experience, enrol in skill development courses,
study the subjects they find challenging and can do some voluntary works for the community
they live in.
I usually plan well-ahead of the vacation and so far I have travelled extensively, done some
part-time jobs, read many books, visited my grandparents and taken three skill development
courses including a language course during my summer vacations in my college. Next year I
am planning to visit Italy for a couple of weeks and take a graphic designing course.
1. Do you generally read a lot of books or do you prefer watching TV? Why?
2. What kind of books are considered good reads in your opinion?
3. Do you think that people read nowadays as they did in the past?
4. Do you regard famous writers as good role models?
5. If a movie is based on a book, would you prefer to read the book or to watch the film?
Why?
6. How our reading habit changes as we grow up? Why does it happen?
Q. 1: Do you generally read a lot of books or do you prefer watching TV? Why?
Answer: I prefer reading books over enjoying random programmes on television. However,
that does not mean that I hate watching TV. I just feel that reading is a far better habit than
watching TV. Every book gives us the opportunity to learn something new and the time
spent on reading a book is more constructive. I can't say the same for the TV. We often
watch TV to kill our time and end up surfing through channels rather than watching
something meaningful.
Q. 3: Do you think that people read nowadays as they did in the past?
Answer: I believe we always had readers in our society and we still have who enjoys reading
books more than any other activity. However, the way people read in the past has changed.
We now have digital devices to read books and the Internet to download and read any book
we like. These days the young generation seems more interested in technology than books
but as I have said, we still have a good number of readers who use the technology to read
books of their favourite writers. Online platforms also enable us to express ourselves about a
writer and his/her books more openly.
Q. 5: If a movie is based on a book, would you prefer to read the book or to watch the
film? Why?
Answer: I would not mind both reading the book and watching the movie. However, my
personal experience has taught me that books are better than movies in most of the cases.
To many, watching a movie is more exciting, and interesting visual effects of the film make it
more appealing. However, books can touch a reader more profoundly than the movie. While
movies can bring whole worlds to life before our eyes, make characters into living, books
ignite our imagination and take us to a world unknown to us and the journey allows us to
feel every experience of the characters, thus leaving a lasting impression in our memory. So,
I might skip watching a few good films based on books but would not want to miss those
books.
Q. 6: How our reading habit changes as we grow up? Why does it happen?
Answer: As we grow up, we tend to read more and the reading habit is solely based on our
interests than academic requirements. In our childhood, we are so innocent and thus a fairy
tale can take us to a wonderful mythical world. We want to be like the hero or heroine who
has magical powers to destroy the evil. This is however not the case when we grow up as our
mind gets maturity and it requires more practical ingredients to be challenged and
entertained. Thus in our adulthood, we want to be like a real-life hero who has no
mysterious power but has sheer willpower and determination to face the challenges and
change the world or at least change people around him. Our perspective to view the world
around us changes as we grow up and so does our book choice.
Q. 2: How do you think people will get their news in the future?
Answer: I think technology will change the way we will get and share news in the future.
Most people will rely on their handheld devices, that are connected to the Internet, as the
primary source of news and information. Traditional newspapers and news channels, on the
other hand, will become less popular in the future because of the time lag between when
something happens and when readers get the chance to read or view them. Since mobile
devices can offer instant updates, they will be a powerful way of getting news updates.
Listening to the preferred type of news by using small devices attached to our ears would
become more popular and the type of news we would like to listen to shall be determined
by our activities and interests.
However, this device has its dark side as well. State TV channels are often the tool for
political propaganda, and people who watch TV too much often suffer from dangerous
diseases like diabetes and obesity.
Q. 6: How has social media changed the way we get and share the news?
Answer: Social media is an excellent tool that connects people and let us share updates,
news and information with the people we care. It has made it possible not only to read the
news but also to raise our voice and concern. Thus it has made a common platform for
ordinary citizens to express themselves and their opinions about the world. Getting and
sharing interesting news is easier than ever before.
However, people's tendency to share news without verifying authenticity has also made it
chaotic. For instance, half of the news found on such social media is either fake or
fabricated.
IELTS Speaking Part 3 Topic: Internet.
1. Do most people have a computer at home in your country? What do most people use it
for?
2. Do you think all the information on the internet is true?
3. How can people find reliable information on the internet?
4. How has the internet changed the way we live?
5. How has the internet changed the way we work?
6. Do you think the internet is safe for children to use unsupervised?
Q. 1: Do most people have a computer at home in your country? What do most people use
it for?
Answer: Well, to answer this question, I should first mention that the ownership of
computers is almost ten times higher in cities than that of villages in my country. Thus most
of the families living in a city own at least a computer except for poor people while almost
one in twelve families in rural areas have a computer or a laptop.
The activities on a computer vary based on the users' age group. For instance, children like
to watch cartoons, draw pictures and play games on a computer while teenagers mostly use
the Internet on a computer or laptop to use their favourite social networking websites, find
information to complete their school assignments and for entertainment purposes. Adults
often use a computer to connect to the internet, check emails, learn new software, create
presentations, do online shopping and listen to their favourite music.
However, there is a downside to this fabulous technology. Our overreliance on the internet
has made us home-centric and we prefer to stay at home rather than going outside and
socialising. This is detrimental for our social and personal life that we often fail to realise.
ELTS Speaking Part 3 topic: Technology in housework & Technology in the workplace.
1. What kinds of machines are used for housework in modern homes in your country?
2. How have these machines benefited people? Are there any negative effects of using
them?
3. Do you think all new homes will be equipped with household machines in the future?
Why?
4. What kinds of equipment do most workers need to use in offices today?
5. How have developments in technology affected employment in your country?
6. Some people think that technology has brought more stress than benefits to employed
people nowadays. Would you agree or disagree? Why?
Q. 1. What kinds of machines are used for housework in modern homes in your country?
Answer: Different kinds of home appliances and machines are some of the main features of
all modern homes today, and the modern homes in my country are no exception either.
These machines may include refrigerators, microwave ovens, vacuum cleaners, dishwashers,
washing machines, and ironing machines. Electric appliances like electric kettles, induction
stoves, blenders and coffee makers are also very common in many, many modern homes in
my country. To deal with extreme heat and extreme cold, many modern homes in my
country also use Air conditioners, room heaters, and geysers (water heaters).
Q. 2. How have these machines benefited people? Are there any negative effects of using
them?
Answer: Machines have benefited people in so many ways that living without them in
today’s world is next to impossible. One of these benefits is that it has increased productivity
and efficiency drastically. Besides, it helps put much less strain on humans by minimizing
human errors. Another benefit is that products become cheaper for consumers since
machines help to produce on a very large scale.
But, machines have some negative effects too. Too much dependency on machines is making
people too lazy. Besides, machines are also causing environmental degradation by releasing
toxic and harmful products into the air and water.
Q. 3. Do you think all new homes will be equipped with household machines in the future?
Why?
Answer: It would actually be hard to predict the preferences and needs of future
homeowners, but given the income and economic disparity around the world today, it would
be fair to assume that not all new homes will be equipped with household machines in the
future. Besides, many people around the world are now slowly but surely beginning to
understand the adverse effects of too much dependency on machines and technology. So,
the chances are that even if many people will have the means and ability to equip their
homes with household machines in future, they will probably hold themselves back from
using them for health and environmental reasons.
However, technology has affected employment a bit negatively too as it has forced some of
the low-skilled labour forces out of their jobs.
Q. 6. Some people think that technology has brought more stress than benefits to
employed people nowadays. Would you agree or disagree? Why?
Answer: If we were to count the numerous benefits of the technology, we would probably
have to disagree with what the question is trying to insinuate. In fact, it wouldn’t be an
exaggeration to suggest that technology today has actually helped the workers to survive,
and survive long and well, with the others. For example, with the help of technology, they
can finish their work rather quickly so that they can relax a bit more and use that extra time
to spend with their family and loved ones. But that’s just one example. How about the
example of a pilot finding his/her way, with the help of advanced technology, in very adverse
weather conditions to land his/her aeroplane safely? The negative aspects of technology
pertain to our overreliance on technology which we can easily adjust. But the blessings that
technology has brought for us simply could not be replaced with anything else.
IELTS Speaking Part 3 topic: Art.
1. Describe the general purpose of art. And say why do people enjoy art?
2. Do you think that art is as important as academic subjects when it comes to educating
children?
3. What are the advantages and disadvantages of art education?
4. Why do you think some people enjoy looking at paintings and sculptures and others do
not?
5. What are the advantages and disadvantages of being an artist?
6. Do you think that some people are naturally better artists than others?
Q. 1. Describe the general purpose of art. And say why do people enjoy art?
Answer: We, humans, are “unique” in our existence and experience. Therefore, it is only
natural that we have our needs and expectation that are unique as well. But among those
unique needs and expectation, that separates us from animals, enjoying art seems to be
something that makes us “truly” unique as humans.
So, what is the general purpose of art? Well, the answer is, art helps us to look at ourselves
little “closer” in a different light by explaining our desire and expectation in more details
which otherwise wouldn’t be possible. With the help of art, we are able to communicate our
social, political, cultural and spiritual ideas in a much more organized manner so that we feel
“challenged” to rethink over the issues and the subjects that are affecting us and our
surroundings on a daily basis.
We enjoy art because it stimulates our hearts and minds to appreciate our lives in a more
positive light. We enjoy art also because it makes us feel “different” by combining our
“unusual motifs” that weave their way into our “subconscious” (or the “hidden” us) and alter
our mood so that we feel free to travel into a different realm.
However, there are some disadvantages to art education as well. Learning art can be time-
consuming and sometimes can take “decade” to succeed in the “business” of art. Another
major disadvantage of art is, people, in general, don’t exactly understand the idea of “art”,
and therefore, don’t exactly learn to “appreciate” art, whether it is drama, painting, or
music, which can be really depressing and de-motivating for the aspiring artists.
Q. 4. Why do you think some people enjoy looking at paintings and sculptures and others
do not?
Answer: The fact, that some people enjoy looking at paintings and sculptures while others
don’t, can be attributed primarily, in my opinion, to how much “art education” one has
received. Besides, this is also an issue of “sensibility” and how emotionally we get triggered
by certain artworks. In fact, there is a theory which explains that because colours, shapes,
sounds and thoughts are all waves form, and the more we are sensitive to these kinds of
waves, the better we can understand an emotional message, considering that a piece of
painting or sculpture essentially is an expression of an emotion, or transmit it. Besides,
another “theory” suggests that most “visually intelligent” people love art while people who
cannot concentrate upon a single detail for more than 10 seconds cannot enjoy art.
However, one of the major disadvantages of being an artist is that he/she is not financially
solvent most of the times, and he/she has to rely on some other sources of income to
survive. And, as a result, an artist has no or a very limited social life. Another disadvantage of
being an artist is most people don’t take “art” as an actual “profession” which can be equally
demoralizing and frustrating for a person with a sense of “self-respect”.
Q. 6. Do you think that some people are naturally better artists than others?
Answer: Yes, I do think that some people are naturally better artists than others, just like
somebody is better in science and mathematics academically, primarily because of their
genetic structure and disposition towards “creativity”. In fact, it is my opinion that it is the
“genetic disposition” of some children who spent much of their time in their childhood by
engaging in creative activity, whether it was drawing or singing, or whatever that they
enjoyed, in order to develop their skills from the early years of their lives in the process of
play.
Of course, some people would choose to argue that it is their “passion” that drives them to
become “better” artists. But, even if I agree with them to some extent just for the “sake of
debate”, I would still argue that if it is not for their “natural inclination or disposition”, they
wouldn’t be able to turn themselves into some “better” artists.
1. Tell me about the types of food that people eat in your country.
2. How are the eating habits now in your country different from eating habits in the past?
3. How healthy is your country’s food?
4. Why do you think different cultures have different table manners?
5. How may eating habits change in the coming decades?
6. What one aspect of a foreign tradition you like about their eating habits? Why?
Q. 1. Tell me about the types of food that people eat in your country.
Answer: I guess that it is fair to say we all love to eat, but what we eat largely depends on
where we live, and what kinds of foods are available there to consume. For example, where I
live, our main foods are steam rice and curries- curries that are made with vegetables, meats
and fishes by mixing them with varieties of spices in proper measures. We also eat a lot of
“bread” in combination with curries or some sweets that we like.
Of course, the food, which I just mentioned above, are regular day foods for regular
occasions. When there is a special occasion, we cook foods like “chicken biriyani” or “mutton
biriyani” by mixing a certain kind of long-grain rice, such as basmati with a great aromatic
flavour, with meats of our choice while adding a mixture of freshly-ground spices in it in
order to make the dish even more delicious. Then, there are of course fast foods which we
also enjoy eating on a limited scale.
Q. 2. How are the eating habits now in your country different from eating habits in the
past?
Answer: Traditionally, in the past, people in my country relied heavily on home-cooked food,
such as steam rice, curry and bread along with local fruits and vegetables. But, in the last
couple of decades, we have seen that some “not-so” traditional food items (of course, in the
context of my country’s food habits) such as pasta, pizza, French fries, burgers and
sandwiches, mostly cooked and served at restaurants and fast food places, have also made
their ways into the menu of our regular foods. As a result, we are becoming more and more
“reliant”, especially in the big cities, on fast food instead of home-cooked food which has
ruled our appetite for hundreds of years. We are even ordering for “home delivery” which
was almost impossible to imagine even a decade ago!
In fact, the only reason, for which I would say that our food is not always as “healthy” as we
would prefer them to be, is that people in my country, in general, like to eat a bit too many
spices in their foods purely because of “additional taste and flavour”. But, other than that, I
am pretty confident that food in my country is pretty healthy because we boil them and cook
them properly.
Chopsticks, on the other hand, had dull ends, thus sparing their users from images of the
slaughterhouse. But, the very knives, which got rejected by the people in East Asia on the
ground it would remind the “gruesome” image of the slaughterhouse, became the symbol of
“aristocracy” at the dinner table in medieval Europe probably because they were and still are
used to eating meats and fishes that are usually cut into rather “large pieces” instead of
small ones.
In the same way, people in the Arab world, including Iran, and some parts of Africa like to
eat by making themselves comfortable on the floors, while eating at homes, in order to
uphold one of the many traditions of Prophet Mohammad (peace be upon Him). This “sitting
habit” is practised also because people would feel that their stomach is getting full by eating
much less than they would normally like to eat, which is actually in a way healthier than
eating on a table.
Besides, I also wouldn’t be surprised if most of the people in different parts of the world stop
cooking at home completely because of making fast food available at a very affordable price.
However, at the same time, I wouldn’t also be surprised if we see “obesity” becoming an
epidemic problem or disease all over the world.
Q. 6. What one aspect of a foreign tradition you like about their eating habits? Why?
Answer: I like pretty much all the traditions with regards to eating habits of all countries and
cultures as they all help me to understand and appreciate the “diversities” in our world in a
better way. But one particular tradition, which I really like, is the habit of eating fishes by the
Japanese people. In fact, fish is featured so much prominently on the Japanese food menu
that the average Japanese person consumes more than 154 pounds annually - or about a
half pound a day!
The Japanese are so “mad” about eating fish that they collectively consume 12% of the
world’s fish while accounting for only 2% of the global population. I like this particular habit
because the health benefits of eating fish are just too many to count, and I also happen to
enjoy eating fish too much! Besides, who doesn’t know that fresh, cured, smoked, or salted,
fish, loaded with vitamin A and omega-3 fatty acids, help to protect against various types of
cancer!
1. Do you think job satisfaction is more important than salary when choosing a job?
2. What skills do you think are needed to get a good job these days?
3. Do you think women should be able to do all the same jobs that men do?
4. How has technology changed the way we work?
5. What is the difference between white-collar and blue-collar jobs?
6. What jobs do you think are most valuable to society?
Q. 1. Do you think job satisfaction is more important than salary when choosing a job?
Answer: When it comes to seeking satisfaction from work, the basic philosophy is pretty
simple - get a job that you love and work your way up to earning a lot. But, unfortunately,
life isn’t really that simple, especially, when options are rather limited and the choices vary
greatly from person to person.
I would say that salary is more important to many than their job “satisfaction” from where
they see the life as the more money they have, the better they will be able to take care of
their “needs”. But to me, job satisfaction is far more important than the money I will earn
from my job.
Q. 2. What skills do you think are needed to get a good job these days?
Answer: In the past, we could get good jobs if we have a good degree or certification and a
good result. But, these days, things are a bit tricky when it comes to landing on a good job as
just a good degree and good result are not enough. We need to have some “soft skills” also,
such as great people and communication skills, planning and organizing skills, good team
works, problem-solving skills and great time management skills. On top of that, we also need
to be “connected” to a network of professionals in the same fields in which we are looking
for jobs. Finally, knowledge and skills in technology, especially in computer and internet, are
also important these days to get a good job.
Q. 3. Do you think women should be able to do all the same jobs that men do?
Answer 1: This is a difficult issue to deal with. However, I will be completely honest in my
opinion. I don’t necessarily think that women should be able to do the same jobs that men
do primarily because of their different job expectation, physical built and safety issues from
a job.
Women shouldn’t be really doing works like operating drilling machine to make holes in the
streets nor they should be working in military engineering core to build a bridge overnight.
Women should also not be doing jobs that require them to do some “heavy lifting” or
climbing up to an electric power plant. In fact, I would dare to say that women were not
created to do everything that men can dot but rather, women were created to do everything
that men are not able to do.
Answer 2: There is no doubt that women are just as much capable as men in doing many
jobs, and perhaps sometimes better in some jobs, which are not really that physically
demanding and does not pose threat to women. So I would say a female can do any job that
a man can do. But I also believe that just because women are equally adept to do some jobs
that men can do, they should not take up any jobs especially if the job environment is not
safe for them.
Because of using computer system like project management software, our businesses and
workplaces are way more organized than before as it helps in building, delegating,
reviewing, and assessing a task much more efficiently and thus helping in keeping everything
on track. Businesses, big and small alike, are now able to use science and math more than
ever before, because of using technology, to determine what their customers want, when in
the past, they did this mostly on a “hunch”. There are so many other examples like these.
On the other hands, the white-collar jobs, wherein the employee does clerical works in an
office, without getting their clothes “dirty”, and draws a monthly salary at a fixed rate.
White-collar workers usually have a higher degree or certification.
The difference between blue-collar and white-collar jobs is fading away with the passage of
time due to the low pay scale of the white-collar jobs and high demand for skilled labourers.
Q. 2. Have the types of transport people use changed much over the last few decades?
Answer: As a developing nation, Bangladesh still is heavily reliant on affordable public
transports, but over the last few decades, the country has gradually started to prefer a bit
expensive private transports, such private cars, private minivans and private commercial
buses, over the public transports because of their “easy” availability. This change has taken
place, of course, because of the steady economic growth in the country over the last few
decades. Another significant change, which my country has witnessed in the last few
decades, is that the number of motorbikes has skyrocketed (because of their availability and
affordability) as more and more people are relying on these two-wheeled vehicles in order
to travel short distance rather easily and conveniently.
Q. 3. What kind of improvement have there been in transport in your country in recent
years?
Answer: In recent years, the road and transportation system in Bangladesh has significantly
improved as more wide highways and roads have been built to facilitate the transportation a
greater number of vehicles from one part of the country to another. Major bridges over the
large rivers, connecting one part of the country to another, and elevated expressways have
also been built in order to significantly reduce the travel time and length.
As for the improvements in vehicles, more and more luxurious buses and trains with air
conditioning systems have been added, both in private and public sectors, in order to ensure
the comfort and luxury for the passengers recently. The number of domestic flights of
aeroplanes has also increased significantly over the last few years as more and more
passengers are becoming interested in using aerial routes.
Q. 5. Do you think most people should use public transports? Why/ why not?
Answer: Yes, I think that most people should use public transports, depending on their
availability, as they seem to be more affordable and more reliable in most cases. Besides, in
a developing nation like Bangladesh, allowing private citizens to dominate a particular
service sector almost inevitably will pave the way for “abuse” and “exploitation” of the
existing system in order to “reap off” the citizens financially. On top of that, with more and
more people using public transportation systems, the country will be able to put a “cap” on
the “indiscriminate use” of private transports, even when not needed, in order to prevent
the roads and streets from getting over-crowded. And, as a result of this, we will be able to
keep a “cap” on air pollution as well in our country.
Q. 6. Why some countries impose higher taxes on car ownership? How is the scenario in
your country?
Answer: The primary reason to impose hefty taxes on car ownership is to discourage citizens
from buying and using more and more private cars and to curb air pollution.
The scenario in my country is not much different when it comes to imposing higher taxes on
car ownership. In fact, over the last decade, the number of private cars has increased to such
extent that the government has been forced to put a tax on the ownership of a new car as
high as 300% of the purchasing price in some cases!
This kind of high taxes is only natural in countries where there are a huge number of
travellers with significantly limited road infrastructures as this is how the government of a
country tries to limit the number of private cars on the streets. This should be also a familiar
scenario in countries where there are risks of higher air pollution than its normal danger
level.
1. Do you think that famous people are generally happier than ordinary people?
2. What qualities does a person need to have in order to be famous?
3. Is it easier or more difficult to achieve fame today than in your grandparents’ time?
4. Describe the ways that famous people influence the public.
5. Do you think more is expected from famous people than ordinary citizens?
6. What types of people become famous in your country? Do you want to be famous?
Q. 1. Do you think that famous people are generally happier than ordinary people?
Answer: The problem with the definition of “happiness” is that it just has no common
definition and meaning that is accepted by all. In fact, every individual chooses to define
happiness in his/ her own unique way the way he/she deems it.
So, are the famous people are generally happier than ordinary people? Well, I would venture
to say that being “famous” has nothing to do with being “happier” simply because
“happiness” is nothing but just a state of mind. Of course, famous people are usually more
satisfied than the average people because their “needs and wants” are easily met at their
wills. But, unfortunately, we tend to confuse ‘satisfaction’ with ‘happiness’. However, does
that necessarily mean that famous people can’t be happier than ordinary people? Well, the
answer is, of course, they can be, but it will be so not because they are “famous”, but
because they just “choose” to remain happy with or without having the “satisfaction” in life
just like the “ordinary” people.
Q. 3. Is it easier or more difficult to achieve fame today than in your grandparents’ time?
Answer: Yes, for better or worse, it is easier, generally speaking, to “achieve” fame today
than in our grandparents’ time primarily because today people have more scopes and
opportunities at their disposal to advertise themselves on different kinds of media channels
due to the technological advancements. Besides, we also seem to have “compromised” a lot
with the traditional social and cultural values in becoming famous. In fact, it looks like the
more one can behave “out of the box”, the easier it gets for him or her to be famous. I have
a friend who has more than 80 thousand YouTube followers and he is kind of famous in his
community. It was unheard of during my grandparents' era, thanks to the technological
advancement we have in our modern days.
Q. 5. Do you think more is expected from famous people than ordinary citizens?
Answer: Yes, I do think that more is expected from famous people than ordinary citizens as
being famous usually mean that they have more “power” and “influence” to accomplish
good things economically, socially and culturally in order to help the average people with no
or very limited “power”. Famous people also have the power to communicate or to reach a
large segment of ordinary citizens as they are the leaders to their followers more often than
not. Therefore, it is only natural for the ordinary citizen to expect that famous people
must have a good sense of responsibility to guide their followers towards a better life.
Q. 6. What types of people become famous in your country? Do you want to be famous?
Answer: People, who work in the film industry and play sports, usually become famous in
my country rather quickly. And politicians don’t really lag very far behind them either.
However, the difference is, in my opinion, the famous people in the film industry and sports
are “famous” because most of the average citizens genuinely like them because of their
creativities and performance while people “like” the famous politicians out of “fear”.
Yes, I would like to be famous one day, but I am certainly not looking to be famous
“overnight” as many of the “so-called” famous people these days who have pretty much
changed the “rules of the game” for worse.
But, luckily we can make up for those lost time and opportunities by going on holidays with
our families together by carefully planning them whenever we get an opportunity. In other
words, we should never underestimate the power of holidays as a very good way to create
an even stronger bond with our families even if it means to spend an hour enjoying a family
meal together.
Among the advantages of modern technology, I can say that it has made our lives much
easier than it used to be ever before a few decades ago. It has revolutionized our production
systems in all kinds of businesses and industries by increasing the output, quality and
efficiency at all levels. The advancement in the communication technology, with the advent
of the internet, has made communication among us so easy and fast that we can actually
talk to each other on video even if we are a world apart from each other. Besides, modern
technologies also made it pretty easy for us to get access to virtually any kind of information
at any time and anywhere through smart gadgets like the iPad, iPhone, Galaxy tablets and
etc. Finally, the use of modern technology has also made it very easy for us to travel long
distances really fast. In fact, nowadays, we can travel a 10 miles distance within just a few
minutes, if not any lesser, by using electric trains, aeroplanes and fast cars which were
almost impossible even a few decades ago.
On the other hand, one of the greatest disadvantages of using modern technology is it
makes us “idle” to a point that we don’t even make an effort to do a calculation as simple as
adding or subtracting and use a calculator to do it. But the problem with such “inaction” is
that we are actually killing some of our memory cells in our brain. Modern technology is also
being used to bring deaths and destruction upon this earth as it helps in building such
advanced new war weapons that it was even impossible to imagine them even a few
decades back. Finally, as most technological discoveries aim to reduce human efforts, it
would only mean that more work is done by machines instead of humans. And as a result,
more and more people are losing their jobs to machines as processes are becoming
automated, and humans just can’t compete with such processes.
Technology has indeed proved the age-old saying “talk is cheap”- so cheap that we talk to
each other by using our phones pretty much always, whether we are staying close to each
other or far apart, even when we don’t need it. We have also become lazy to walk even 100
feet or a few minutes these days if we are in need to communicate something to our friends
or families since we can do the same in seconds just by pushing a button on our phones. But,
if we are not in a mood or feel really lazy to “talk” sometimes, we simply leave or send a
message on social media networks and “messenger” to inform others about our “status”.
Finally, technology has made communication really “personal” as we can see each other on
live video while communicating, no matter where we live with the use of the internet.
Q. 4. How has technology changed the nature of long-distance relationships?
Answer: Technology has changed the nature of long-distance relationships mostly for the
better. In the past, we would have to rely on “postal mails”, or expensive “long-distance”
calls from our land phones, to communicate with each other. But even that was not always
possible due to the limited “infrastructure” necessary to ensure these services efficiently.
But, with the improvement in the communication infrastructure and communication
technologies, such as internet and smartphones, we can not only communicate with each
other in seconds, but we can actually see each other live on video, even if we live in another
corner of the world. So, by the way, we wouldn’t be really very surprised if we see one day
that the ‘postal mails” are being preserved in a museum as a “thing of the past”.
Q. 6. How could technology be considered a hindrance for us? Can we overcome it?
Answer: Modern technology can be considered as an impediment for us when we are
relying too much on it. In fact, it wouldn’t be an exaggeration to suggest that technology is
limiting our potentials and growth, as humans, both physically and mentally. For example,
before the advancement of modern technology, we used to walk to a local grocery shop, in
order to buy our groceries, which was certainly good for our health and minds (since we
could feel more closed to our natural surroundings). But, now, we simply ride in our vehicles
to do the same task because we just feel too lazy to get out of our comfort zone. The end
result of such “laziness”? The answer is “Obesity” with a big “O”!
However, the greatest, and also the most dangerous at the same time, in my opinion,
hindrance is that we have actually started to believe that without technology, we just won’t
be able to survive. In other words, we are leaving ourselves to the “mercy” of technology,
and if, God forbids, it ever stops working, our very existence, as a human race, will be at
stake. So, can we overcome this hindrance? Yes, we sure can if we just reduce our reliance
on technology a little and make ourselves a bit more “active” both physically and mentally.
Q. 2. How important is it to get advice from other people when making decisions?
Answer: It is very important, in my opinion, to receive advice from other people always,
when making decisions, primarily because it would help one become familiar with an array
of ideas and possibilities with regards to the kinds of outcomes he/she would need to
expect. Besides, when we are opened to receiving advice from others, the chances are that
we would be able to learn about the outcomes when somebody took the same kind of
decisions in the past. Finally, we should be opened to receive advice from others, when
making decisions, even if they don’t serve our purposes in the present since there is always a
chance that they would benefit us in the future.
Whether a piece of advice will be accepted or not depend largely also on the “location”
where the advice is being offered. For example, if we want to advise a person on not do
something while he is terribly busy with his works at his office, the chances are that he won’t
pay any attention to that advice.
Q. 4. What are some of the most important decisions young people have to make?
Answer: Young people are not “exempted” from making important decisions just because
they are called “young”. In fact, they also have to make some important decisions in their
lives such what kind of career path to choose; what kinds of subjects to study at universities,
or when to get married and start a family. Finally, what kind of “financial” habit and “health”
habit to practice is also a very important decision, along with the decisions above I just
mentioned, for young people to make if they want to live happy and healthy for the rest of
their lives.
Q. 5. Do you agree that parents should make important decisions for their children?
Answer: Parents should make important decisions, in consent with the inputs and opinion of
the children, for their children until they reach their “adulthood”. But once they are grown
up and ready to leave the “nest”, parents should leave their children alone to make
important decisions on their own. If the parents don’t allow their children to make
important decisions, they will probably never learn how to take “risks’ in life and live on their
own. In fact, parents should always encourage their children to make decisions even if their
children are reluctant to do so. After all, parents will never be around them forever to help
their children out during crucial times.
Q. 6. Is it better to make a decision thinking about what you want or thinking about what
other people want?
Answer: Yes, it is always better to make a decision thinking what I really want instead of
worrying about what others really want primarily because it will be me who will have to live
with whatever decision I make for the rest of my life one way or another. Of course, it never
harms to consult with the people, we love or care for, and ask them what they also want,
from time to time in order to bring them on board with my decision, but the decision will
always be mine based on what I really want.
One thing, which is worth mentioning here, is that one doesn’t worry what others want, not
because he/she has total disregards for others, but because it would be easier for the
decision-maker to achieve his/her goal rather easily since he/she is so intimately involved
with the decision made.
Q. 3. What can the government in your country do to deal with those problems?
Answer: The government can do plenty in my country to deal with these problems. First,
they can completely ban the use of plastic products and replace them with some
environmental-friendly products. It can also offer some incentives for not using these
harmful products. The government can also take the necessary steps to plant more and
more trees to make up the loss of forests while improving the waste disposal systems in
order to reduce the land and water pollution. However, it is also important to understand
that the government alone is not able to deal with these environmental problems
successfully unless it takes concrete steps to raise public awareness about the dangers of
environmental pollutions.
Q. 6. Environmental problems are too big to be dealt at the individual level? Do you agree?
Why/Why not?
Answer: Yes, I have no doubt in my mind that environmental problems are too big to deal
with at the individual level simply because they don’t have the required resources,
knowledge and the technologies to solve the problems of such big magnitude. Besides, there
is no boundary between our rivers, forests, earth’s atmosphere, as well as the air, we
breathe. Therefore, no matter how hard, some individuals, in some parts of a country or the
world, are trying to clean up their “environment”, if it is not “coincided” and “coordinated”
with the others somewhere else, then the chances are that it is doing no good. And,
unfortunately, “coordination” is something which can’t be “enforced” without the
governments’ active involvement in such cases.
Q. 5. Do you think unelected heads of state are a good idea? Why/ Why not?
Answer: Honestly speaking, I really think that it is a great idea to put unelected officials as
the heads of the states as long as there is solid transparency in accountability. The election
in these days can be rigged easily, and, as a result, it is very possible that the real “winners”
or elected officials are not exactly getting the chances to hold the office. However, it
wouldn’t really be so bad itself if not so much money and time were invested in holding
these elections. Besides, in some “developing” countries, we also witness a lot of violence
during the election times which can actually divide an entire nation.
Q. 3. Can we gain life experience from books and movies? Why/ Why not?
Answer: No, we can’t really gain life experiences from books and movies mainly because
one actually has to live through real-life situations in order to gain experience. No doubt that
books and movies can present some real stories and experiences of individuals in a very
rational and realistic manner except, of course, the problem is each and every person in this
world is different with different mindsets, skills, abilities and talents. Therefore, just because
one individual experiences something in a certain situation, it doesn’t necessarily mean that
another person will experience the same thing in the same manner.
Q. 4. Which is more important, experience or potential? Why?
Answer: I would say that "experience" is more important than "potential" at any time of the
day. Having experience usually means that a person has the proven track records of getting
things done. Having experience, more often than not, makes somebody confident about
doing something very challenging in adverse condition. Besides, having experiences helps
somebody to make wise decisions, especially when facing difficult choices. Finally,
experience makes someone mature and respected, and as a result, others around him feel
confident enough to follow his lead. On the contrary, "potential" of a person is often
unexplored and untested unless a really good mentor or our confidence bring it to work.
Q. 5. What experience do you wish you had gained? Wh do you think so?
Answer: Well, I am lucky that I really have some great experiences in my life, but more is
always better. Isn’t it? So, sometimes, I really wish that I had the experience of travelling at
least two to three countries from each continent in order to experience what this beautiful
world has in store for us. Besides, I also want to be able to write on my own travel
experiences as well in my own website, which I am planning to launch in near future, in
addition to the experiences of other travellers in my country. Besides, I wish I were able to
write the way some good writers can tell their stories.
Q. 2. Tell me about the types of programmes that are generally on television in your
country.
Answer: There are all kinds of programs on television in my country which are watched
fairly on a regular basis. These programs include hourly news programs, political talk shows,
musical programs, education quiz shows, movie shows, documentary programs, magazine
shows, dance shows, cooking shows, drama serials, travel adventure programs, sports
shows, and agricultural shows.
1. At what age should people retire from work? Why do you think so?
2. What problems can people face after their retirement?
3. How important are retirees to your country’s economy? Why/ Why not?
4. When should you start saving for retirement?
5. Why do some companies encourage early retirement?
6. Do you think the state should take responsibility for retirees who worked in private
companies rather than government organisation?
Q. 1. At what age should people retire from work? Why do you think so?
Answer: If it were me, I would choose to “retire” at an early age, with the required financial
security of course, primarily because it would allow me to do and enjoy the things when I
would still remain “healthy and active” both mentally and physically. Besides, the issue of
the “retirement age” becomes a bit irrelevant as long as someone is enjoying his or her
works/activities unless, of course, a company or organization has the policy of enforcing a
strict “deadline” for retirement. Anyway, ideally, if a person enters his career at the age of
25 and spends his time wisely and efficiently, then he should be good to “retire” at 50, which
would allow him a good 10 year to enjoy his life before starting to consider him as a “senior”
citizen at an age of 60.
Q. 3. How important are retirees to your country’s economy? Why/ Why not?
Answer: The retirees are considered to be an important component of my country’s
economy primarily because they help keep our economy running by saving their money little
by little which then, in turn, get used by our government for different kind of development
works. Besides, many retirees in my country just don’t sit “idle”, and, instead, choose to use
their wealth of past work experiences to generate some incomes for themselves and their
families which certainly contribute to the growth of our economy. However, some will argue
that the retirees are some kind of “drag down” for our economy because they collect money
from the government, but they forget that it’s their money, and the government is just
supposed to “manage” them.
Q. 6. Do you think the state should take responsibility for retirees who worked in private
companies rather than government organisation?
Answer: Yes, the state should have a responsibility in taking care of retirees of the private
companies in some capacity primarily because they also contribute to the economy of a
country. However, it doesn’t necessarily mean that the private retirees are also “paid” by the
government just like the government retirees, but rather the government should extend its
helping hands to private company retirees also in order to ensure a “minimally secured
financial future” for them should the private companies fail to do so. After all, it is also the
responsibility of the government to encourage, if not “force”, the private companies to take
care of their ‘retirees’ in whichever capacity they can afford.
Q. 2. How has gift giving changed since your grandparents’ time? How?
Answer: Yes, I would say that gift giving has changed since my grandparents’ time. Back in
those days, people used to give gifts mostly on some special occasions, such as birthdays and
wedding anniversaries, but today, one doesn’t really have to have an occasion for it. Besides,
unlike in the past, people today expect “personalised” gifts with some kinds of thoughts
behind them. Finally, today we can choose a lot more things as gift items which we didn’t
have in the days of our grandparents.
Q. 4. What is more important when it comes to giving a gift, cost or effort? Why?
Answer: In my opinion, the effort is more important than the cost when it comes to giving a
gift. For example, if a person chooses an expensive gift for his or her partner, but the partner
doesn’t like it because it just doesn’t go with him/her styles or colour preferences, then the
costly gift actually becomes “useless”. On the other hands, if a person gives a lot of thoughts
and times in choosing a gift in order to make sure that he/she really understands what
his/her partner likes or prefers, then the gift, no matter how “cheap” it is, would surely go a
long way to impress the partner.
Q. 5. Do you think that people have become more materialistic when it comes to giving
gifts, as compared to your grandparents’ time?
Answer: Yes, I would certainly like to think that people have become more materialistic,
when it comes to giving gifts, primarily because we are living in a very “materialistic” society.
Besides, our culture has grown more commercial, where “gift giving” – expensive gifts that
is, has turned into a booming industry. Finally, media these days also play a crucial role in
fostering an “unrealistic” expectation among people to buy “perfect gifts” without
necessarily understanding the idea of a “perfect gift”.
Q. 6. How has modern technology changed the nature of gift giving? How?
Answer: Modern technology, like the internet, e-commerce and online shopping, has
revolutionized the nature of gift giving by making it fast, affordable and convenient. In fact,
we can choose the perfect gifts for our loved ones for any occasion, even if they live in
another corner of the world, from the comfort of our homes on the internet and have them
delivered to their doorsteps in hours, if not any quicker! The best thing about this modern
technology is that we can actually get the opinions on the “gift ideas”, before actually buying
them, from our friends and families almost instantly because we can send the ‘pictures’ to
them through emails or messenger services. We can even send someone a gift card so that
the recipient can choose his/her own gift from a collection of items.
IELTS Speaking Part 3 topic: The internet and its impact on our social life.
1. What types of websites are popular among your generation?
2. Is using the internet a social or solitary activity? Why?
3. How has the internet changed social behaviour?
4. Should companies check job applicants’ online profiles? Why/ Why not?
5. What will be the next big development online?
6. How has the internet changed the way we communicate with others?
However, there is a completely different side of the use of the internet which connects
friends and relatives and give people a common platform to raise their voice or share
information for good. A year ago, our local administrator decided to build a factory near our
neighbourhood and many people learned about it via the internet. They shared their
thoughts and finally met to protest it personally. I see this event as a great example of how
the internet can strengthen our social relationship and bring good things to society.
Q. 4. Should companies check job applicants’ online profiles? Why/ Why not?
Answer: Yes, I think that companies should check job applicants’ online profiles in order to
get a better understanding of the prospective applicants’ lifestyles and behaviour pattern.
But, it is also important for companies not to make any decisions, based solely on what they
see or find on their online profiles, simply because they may be just some of the “glimpse” of
moments on some special occasions. Besides, just because somebody does something on
the internet (unless it is absolutely stupid and offensive), it doesn’t necessarily mean that he
or she will do the same thing at works.
Q. 6. How has the internet changed the way we communicate with others?
Answer: The internet has very significantly changed the way we communicate with others.
In fact, it has made communication easier and faster, especially, when sending or receiving a
huge amount of data and information. Besides, the internet has made communication very
affordable too as we can write messages or letter as large as we can and then send them to
our friends and families by using emails without spending virtually anything. Finally, it has
made communication very “personalized” also. In fact, we can view anybody live on camera,
while also talking to them at the same time, no matter if we live a world apart from each
other.
4. Do you think the types of sport that are popular will change in the future?
Answer: Yes, it is very possible that the types of sports, that are popular today, would
change in the future mainly because we will become even busier with our works, and our
priorities most likely would change with it as well in the process. So, the chances are that we
will probably play only those sports which require very little time. Besides, the chances are
that those sports (ie. video games and computer games), which we are able to play at home
with our families, will also become popular in the future. Finally, more and more sponsors
and businesses would try to make other forms of sports popular because of more financial
gains.
5. How can sports bring people from different countries closer together?
Answer: Sports play an important role in bringing people from different countries together
by organizing different forms of international sports tournaments so that teams from those
countries can learn about each other and become each other’s friends in the process of
playing against each other, but that’s only a part of it. Sports also bring the supporters of one
particular country closer to another country because they happen to love the team or
certain players of that country due to their great performance in the field.
The main disadvantage of advertising that I think of is that they increase the cost of the
products because it costs to advertise and the companies pass those advertising cost to be
picked up by the customers. They sometimes mislead the customers because not all the
products, that are advertised, are good for them.
2. Do you think that people are permanently affected by negative childhood memories?
Why do you think so?
Answer: Negative childhood memories have some impacts on our future like but I don’t
think that people are permanently affected by negative childhood memories just as they
aren’t by the positive memories because if they did affect, it would be very difficult for us to
make decisions quickly, and we would always carry a huge load of the complex emotional
bag on our back to be “functional”. Besides, the fact, that we are able to treat some of our
mental illnesses (which are essentially nothing but a collection of negative memories from
our past childhood sometimes) with “psychiatric” treatments, proves to us that people
aren’t affected by childhood memories permanently. If we were enduringly affected by our
negative experiences in childhood, it would have been quite impossible for us to carry on as
adults.
4. Nowadays many parents try to make their children happy by buying them many toys.
How do you feel about this?
Answer: Generally speaking, it makes me feel good when I see that parents are buying their
children many toys in order to make them happy because it helps create “good memories”
in the minds of the children. Besides, the practice also helps create a stronger bond between
the parents and their children. However, while the practice of buying many toys may seem
to be an “innocent” act in isolation, parents would do good on their parts if they also care to
teach their children sometimes not to get “mad or unhappy”, when they (the children) don’t
receive something they really like, in order to help children understand the “realities” of life.
6. What is more important for a child’s happiness, many toys or many friends?
Answer: A child needs both the toys and friends to become happy in his or her life, but they
certainly don’t need “many” of either of them. Contrary to popular belief, I really like to
think that children are “rational”, and they don’t exactly care to understand the complicated
issue of “being happy”. Rather, all the children care is to “enjoy and have fun” in their lives
whether they get them from playing with their friends or by playing with their toys.
Among the disadvantages, sometimes, you might get so obsessed with photography that you
forget to live and enjoy your life in the present moment. Besides, depending on the
photographs in order to get the whole picture about a person or a situation can be
misleading at times.
5. Do you think that people nowadays spend too much time taking photographs? Why?
Answer: If you are asking about the ‘social media’ generation, who are using Facebook,
Twitter and Instagrams pretty much 24/7, then the answer is that they do spend a lot of time
in taking photographs of virtually anything and everything in order to share them with their
friends and families on the internet. But, outside of this social media generation who are
glued to the internet 24/7, I don’t really see that many people are spending much time in
taking photographs unless, of course, there is a very valid reason to do so.
4. Do you think intellectual property laws are too strict? Why do you think that is?
Answer: Yes, I do think that sometimes intellectual property laws are too strict because most
of the copyright laws aren’t exactly aimed at protecting profits of the person, owning the
work, but rather, the laws have become obsessed with the "rights" to show the copyrighted
work in situations where it has very little or no effect on the sales and profit of the owner of
the copyrighted work.
I think, most of the copyright laws for intellectual properties need an amendment to make it
more practical and modern.
5. What is your opinion about the copyright of an intellectual property and idea?
Answer: In my opinion, there should be the copyright laws of intellectual property and idea
in order to protect the interests of the companies and organizations. However, it should also
be said at the same time that most of the copyright and intellectual property laws are
generally written by lobbyists of major companies and organizations without thinking about
the interests of the common public in most cases. Besides, in my opinion, copyrights should
be valid for a much shorter period of time for the purpose of encouraging “fair competition”.
6. Can you cite one example when you noticed a copyright violation? What was it?
Answer: Yes, I have noticed a number of examples where copyright violations had occurred.
For example, incidents like downloading music online which harms the music recording
companies financially. Similarly, I have also found that people are using the copyright images
of other individuals and companies without their permission. Finally, I have also found some
fake companies in my country producing some products without the knowledge of the
original companies or any legal authority.
To be more specific, teenagers and young people mostly like to watch TV programmes, use
the internet and social networking sites like Facebook, play online games, sometimes collect
stamps, and play outdoor games and sports while adults most of the time Watch TV, walk in
the park and read newspapers. The choice of hobbies and leisure activities are quite
different between city-dwellers and villagers. For instance, a teenage boy in a city would
mostly play a video game or chat with friends online in his free time, a teenager in a rural
area, on the contrary, would be busy fishing or playing outdoor games.
How these activities vary are quite prominent in our country. Even I can feel that by just
looking at the different members of my family. While my younger brother loves to travel,
my elder brother plays cricket. Two of my cousins collect stamps and coins while I mostly
read books and magazines. My parents walk in the park and other family members mostly
enjoy movies and other TV programmes.
Human, physically and psychologically, is not prepared to work stay idle all day long. They
need a perfect schedule for working, relaxing, and enjoying their free time. Thus leisure
activities help us enjoy our time, get refreshed, relax, and get recharged for working more.
Interestingly, people who work very hard need more enjoyable free-time activities.
Otherwise, they will suffer from fatigue and get distracted soon.
Personally, I believe that the leisure activities of people are often determined by the society
they live in and their socio-economic status. Finally, some leisure activities are more
common and popular due to their attractions and engagements.
4. Do you think that parents should choose leisure activities for their children? Why/Why
not?
Answer: Yes, I do think that parents should choose leisure activities for their children
primarily because the practice will allow the parents to a have enough oversight over the
activities of their children as in whether they are picking up any bad habits or hanging out
with wrong the crowds. Besides, children are not always intelligent or smart enough to
understand what are good for their proper physical and mental growth, and as such, would
require advice from their parents so that the children are able to extract maximum benefits
from the leisurely activities.
5. Has free time activities among people in your country changed much than that of 2
decades ago?
Answer: I am not sure if I will be able to give a full account of free time activities before two
decades because of my rather young age, but I think that the free time activities in my
country before two decades were pretty much limited to going to a movie theatre, visiting
friends and families, just going to enjoy some snacks or refreshments at a local coffee shop
or watching some games. However, now free time activities have changed a lot because
people today go for frequent shopping at big shopping malls/centres, visit restaurants to try
some international cuisines, and travel to some distant tourist spots in addition to watching
movies at home (not theatre) and surfing on the internet.
6. What changes do you think technologies has brought in the way people enjoy their
leisure activities?
Answer: I think that technologies today have brought significant changes in the way people
enjoy their leisure activities. For example, internet technologies have made it possible to
listen to our favourite music or watch our favourite movies anytime whether we are at home
or on the go. Internet, together with mobile technologies, also has made communication
with our friends and families possible (my favourite leisure activities) even if we live the
world apart. Technologies have also given us “speed” with which we can travel to some
interesting lands, far away from home, in minutes which would probably take hours before,
if not days.
1. What are some popular subjects that university students study in your country? Why?
2. Do you think that university education should be free for students? [Why/Why not]
3. Do you think students from all majors should study subjects like math and history? Why/
Why not?
4. What are the differences between a private university and a public university? Which one
do you prefer?
5. How technology has brought benefits to the way students prepare for their exams?
6. How the use of technology in the classrooms will bring more benefits to teachers and
students? Why?
1. What are some popular subjects that university students study in your country? Why?
Answer: For years, we have seen that subjects like computer science, computer engineering,
electrical engineering, pharmacy, business administration, medical science, public
administration, international relationship, marine science and engineering, and other
engineering subjects (like architectural and mechanical engineering) have remained popular.
These subjects have remained popular primarily because they offer better employment and
earning opportunities. They are popular also because they usually bring a greater social
status and prestige for people that are not exactly associated with other subjects.
2. Do you think that university education should be free for students? Why/Why not?
Answer: No, I don’t really like to subscribe to the idea that university education should be
free for students because that would tempt students to take education for granted, meaning
that they wouldn’t possibly be enough serious about their studies. Besides, free education
would also mean that universities wouldn’t probably have enough funds to put forth for
high-level research works and structural improvements (ie. building new university
residences and faculty halls) which would certainly harm the interests of students in the long
run.
3. Do you think students from all majors should study subjects like math and history?
Why/ Why not?
Answer: In principle, I am in favour of studying all subjects, including math and history,
because the more we learn, the better will it prepare us to face the challenges of the real
world. Studying math equip us more analytical and reasoning capabilities which may prove
out to be crucial in looking for a solution for complicated problems while studying history
would allow us to take a more informed decision in the light of previous success and failures
for identical problems or challenges.
4. What are the differences between a private university and a public university? Which
one do you prefer?
Answer: Well, as the name suggests, private universities are privately owned universities
contrary to the government or state-owned public universities. Private universities are quite
expensive and in many cases, offer a few selected courses. On the other hand, public
universities are funded by the state and do not require high tuition fees for the students.
From my personal experience I can say that, public universities large campuses and a great
number of students while the opposite is the case for private universities.
Which one do I prefer? Well, as a public university student I personally prefer a public
university over a private university. However, I am quite broad-minded in terms of accepting
some advantages of studying at a private university. For example, a student from a private
university can complete his course in due time while this is not possible at many public
universities.
5. How technology has brought benefits to the way students prepare for their exams?
Answer: Technology has brought a number of great benefits to the way students prepare for
their exams today. For example, today students can easily do research works on their
computers by using the internet from the comfort of their homes without really going to a
library. Students can also share and transmit important data and information, which are
necessary to prepare for exams, in seconds by using their emails anytime and anywhere.
Finally, technology has also helped students prepare for exams by allowing them to solve
very complicated problems on their computers with the help of many math and engineering
software and applications which wouldn’t be possible otherwise.
6. How the use of technology in the classrooms will bring more benefits to teachers and
students? Why?
Answer: The use of technology can bring more benefits to teachers and students by allowing
them to collaborate with each other because, in that way, both students and teachers can
engage themselves in a more fun but challenging manner. For example, today, there are
many teaching/learning apps, to be used on our computers, for individualized instruction.
And with these apps, while students can learn at their own pace according to their abilities,
the teachers can also, at the same time, work with the individual students who might
struggle to learn.
2. Do you see the role of private and public ceremonies changing in the future?
Answer: No, I don’t really see the roles of private and public ceremonies are changing in the
future because, both the private and public ceremonies, as they are now today, are being
observed for an array of reasons which have existed and remained the same for thousands
of years. For example, the roles (which is to share fun and happiness among friends and
family members) of birthdays or wedding ceremonies are the same today as they were
before centuries ago. The same can be said pretty much for all other ceremonies.
3. Have attitudes towards marriage changed in recent years?
Answer: Marriage is still an influential aspect of our social bonds, but thanks to the changes
in our mentality about marriage and that help prevent early marriage which was so common
even only 30 years ago. In the past, late marriage for females was unacceptable and often
considered an unfortunate event. However, this is no longer the case, and both males and
females, these days, want to have a career before getting married which, in my opinion, is a
positive trend. However, an increasing number of single parents and the unmarried
population is often indicated by many to be a concerning issue and I accord with them in this
regard.
Overall, our perceptions and attitudes towards marriage have changed to a great extent and
I believe the changes are mostly positive.
4. In what ways do men and women feel differently about marriage, in your opinion?
Answer: I think that depends on the type of marriage we are considering and the country
where the marriage is taking place. For instance, both girls and boys in our country cordially
accept love marriage while they feel differently about settled marriage.
Moreover, a boy has to be an earning member before he can get married while this is not
the case for girls. Since a bride starts living with her husband's family in our country, this is a
major shift for a girl. Grooms, on the other hand, focus more on starting his own family and
thus their thoughts and prepare for the marriage are different.
6. Does the media in your country pay more attention to global or national events?
Answer: This depends on the type of media we are talking about. If it's a national TV
channel, for instance, it primarily focuses on national events. An English newspaper or a
satellite TV channel that has a global audience, on the contrary, has more global than
national news.
However, as a whole, national news and events get more attention from the media white
prominent and important global events are also highlighted in the media we are talking
about.
Q. 2. Do you agree that famous people have more responsibilities than ordinary people?
Answer: Yes, I do agree that famous people have more responsibilities than ordinary people
because ordinary people look up to them for some kind of leadership roles in fixing some of
their problems. And, that’s exactly why sometimes we see world-famous persons like
Angelina Jolie (Hollywood actress) and David Beckham (British soccer superstar) acting as
some special UN (United Nations) envoy and goodwill ambassador in order to raise
awareness on different urgent issues that are affecting our world community negatively.
1. Which one do you use more often – a mobile phone or telephone? Why?
Answer: I mostly used a mobile phone because I can carry it with me all the time. I
sometimes use a landline at home or at my office, but this is not that frequent. The main
reason for my preference is that a mobile phone is absolutely mine, unlike a telephone
which is shared by the whole family or the office staffs. Most of my friends and relatives own
their personal cell phones and they prefer to call on a mobile phone as well. I can be reached
at my cell phone 24/7 which is not possible through the landlines. The cell phone, moreover,
offers the SMS facility that makes it more useful than the landline. Finally, the cell phone I
own is an Android-powered smartphone which I can use to browse the internet, play games,
chat with friends, install useful applications and the list goes on and on. For all these
reasons, I use my mobile phone more often than the telephone.
4. What is the impact of the online-based chatting systems and social networking websites
on the way we make friends and contact our friends?
Answer: The impacts of technology on the way we communicate and make friends have
both advantages and drawbacks. To start, Online chatting and social networking websites
have enabled us to keep in touch with friends and relatives more often than ever before. We
can now make friends beyond boundaries and keep in touch with them whenever we want
from wherever we are. For instance, Facebook has helped me find a few friends from my
school after a decade later. Who knows, without the use of Facebook I could have never
found them. Letting people know what I am up to, or getting updates of dear ones is only a
mouse click away these days.
However, when I need to send a piece of important information to someone, I always send
an SMS. For instance, if I need to send someone my home address, I'll never call and tell him,
instead, I will send an SMS that contains the address.
6. How dangerous it is for someone to use his cellphone while driving a car?
Answer: Using a cell phone while driving is a felony in our country. I am always against this
heinous and senseless act. Personally, I never use a cell phone when I drive. I believe when
someone uses a phone while driving takes a great risk. It is a well-known fact that human
brains cannot concentrate on multiple tasks at a time. So, somebody should never use a
mobile phone while driving as it puts his life as well as the pedestrians' life at risk.
Q. 3. Do you think computers will one day replace teachers in the classroom?
Answer: I wouldn’t really like to think that computers will and should replace teachers one
day in the classroom because students require “human touch” to behave and act like a
“human” in the real world unless, of course, we want our children to become like “human-
robot”. A computer can certainly teach students how to become “smart” in the classroom,
but it won’t probably be able to tell when to behave like one. A computer won’t certainly be
able to teach many other “real-world” human behaviours, emotions and moral disciplines to
students in the classroom like a human teacher.
Q. 4. How has teaching changed in your country in the last few decades?
Answer: In the past few decades, teachers used to rely mostly on chalk pencils, marker pens
and writing boards to teach students in the classrooms, but those teaching materials have
been replaced by computers, keyboards, projectors and wall screens. In these days, teachers
and students are much more connected to each other which were almost impossible even a
decade ago. In fact, with the tremendous advancement in the information and mobile
technology, learning through digital games and learning apps have become more and more
popular these days. Finally, both students and teachers are learning more and more new
things and sharing their information among each other since collecting data and information
have become much easier these days than it was about a few decades ago.
Q. 5. What is the difference between the way children learn and the way adults learn?
Answer: Children and adults learn in fundamentally different ways. Adults are self-learners
and decide what is important to be learned next while young students are dependent on
adults (teachers) for their next lessons, assignments and subjects. The children usually tend
to accept the information, presented to them, based on their face values, since they have no
or very little experience upon which to draw ( any conclusion) while the adults usually try to
challenge information and accept them only after validating them in the light of their beliefs
and experience. Finally, children are usually motivated to learn because of rewards or
punishment, but adults tend to learn because of their “interest”.
The lessons can be interesting also if the children are allowed to make their own “choices”
on what contents to learn and how to learn them. Teachers can make lessons interesting for
their children by creating contents are which are more “real-life” oriented such as allowing
their students to do their math based on how much money they would like to spend in
buying their favourite ice creams and so on.
Q. What type of person (parents, teachers, friends etc) are best to influence young
people’s behaviour?
Answer: Ideally speaking, parents and teachers are the best people to influence young
people’s behaviour because they are the ones with whom young people spend most of their
time when growing up as “children”. And, we all know very well that whatever we learn as
“children” at our houses and schools, they are likely to remain with us for the rest of our
lives. But, again, it all depends on how much time young people spend with these persons,
and what these young people learn from them.
Q. What do you think young people will be most influenced by in the future?
Answer: I think that in the future, young people would be most influenced by what they see
on the internet because they will spend most of their time on it. Besides, it is also possible
that the young people will also be influenced by other forms of technology, such as robots,
because the chances are robots will teach the students and young people in the future.
Q. Who do you believe have more influence on young children - parents or teachers?
Why?
Answer: In my humble opinion, parents are supposed to influence young children more
than the teachers because of biological and emotional attachment. Besides, from the day, a
child is born, he or she remains with the parents. So whatever, the parents say or do, the
children pick that up unconsciously. Besides, there is a “parents’ fear factor” among the
children which make the children learn whatever their parents tell them to do. Finally,
parents usually are the “designated legal guardians” of the children, and as such, they have
the “right’ to teach their children whatever they find “fit”.
Q. Do you think more should be done to protect naturally beautiful spots in your country?
Answer: Yes, I think more should be done to protect the naturally beautiful spots, like sea
beaches, lakes, mountains and forests, in my country. We will have to make sure that our
natural sea beaches and lakes don’t become dirty and contaminated, not only because of
tourists but also for protecting seafood. Special efforts should also be made to protect the
mountains from becoming “residence” and “industrial sites”. Finally, our natural heritage
forest sites should also be protected from unauthorized “deforestation” in order to protect
our wildlife.
Q. What can a government do to encourage people not to harm the environment?
Answer: To start, a government can take all the necessary steps to increase awareness,
either by using different kinds of print and digital media or by introducing details school
curricula on environmental protection, among its citizens so that they are encouraged to
take care of their natural environment. Then, a government can also introduce stringent
laws in order to punish its citizens who harm their environment willingly. Finally, a
government can also introduce “award system” for those people who successfully keep the
environment clean and safe in their own towns or places.
1. Tell me, what do you think are the greatest environmental problems facing your country
at present?
2. And what has been done so far to solve these problems?
3. How successful would you say these measures have been?
4. Do you think things are likely to get better or worse in the future?
5. Is what you are going to study likely to be of any use to solve these problems?
6. Should countries try to solve climate change problems together or individually? Why?
Q. Tell me, what do you think are the greatest environmental problems facing your
country at present?
Answer: There is hardly any country in the world which is not facing serious environmental
problems today. However, some of the greatest environmental problems, my country is
facing today, include extreme high temperatures in some parts of my country (due to the
greenhouse effects) and surface water contamination because of many industrial toxic and
plastic waste. In fact, the high-temperature problem is so serious in my country that some
parts of it are becoming like deserts slowly but surely. Then, there is the issue of serious air
pollution as well, especially, in the big cities of my country.
Q. Do you think things are likely to get better or worse in the future?
Answer: Well, it is going to get worse in the future before getting better because
unfortunately, we are way too late in addressing these serious environmental problems on a
“macro” level. Besides, countries around the world can’t seem to agree upon the best
courses of actions in order to deal with these environmental problems on a larger scale.
Finally, it is going to get worse in the short run also because we don’t see any sign of slowing
down in (mis)using the “resources of the earth” in order to feed our “greed” to ensure the
comfort and luxury of our modern life.
Q. Is what you are going to study likely to be of any use to solve these problems?
Answer: No, my study has nothing to do whatsoever with addressing these environmental
problems. But, then again, just because I am not studying to solve these problems, it doesn’t
necessarily mean that I won’t be able to do anything about them. In fact, I can also try to
raise awareness on the dangers of environmental problems from my own position on
“micro” level, in addition to doing little things like planting trees at my front yard or not
throwing any plastic waste in the lakes, wherever I go, and whatever I do.
Q. Should countries try to solve climate change problems together or individually? Why?
Answer: In my humble opinion, countries should try to solve the climate change problems
collectively, as opposed to doing it individually, because while countries may have “land
boundaries” between them, they don’t have any boundaries between the oceans, they
share, or any “wall” to separate the “air” between them. In other words, the action of a few
countries is enough to spoil the good environmental works of all other countries because,
again, we share the same ‘air’ and ‘water’ one way or another. Besides, global warming and
environmental problems are global concerns and are not manageable by countries
individually. Therefore, we need collaborative planning and initiatives to address them.
Q. How have clothes fashions changed in your country over the last few decades?
Answer: Clothing styles and fashions have significantly changed in our country over the last
few decades. As a result, traditional clothing today is “frowned upon” unless they are worn
during some “traditional festivals and celebration”. In fact, today we can see that even a 60-
year-old person is wearing “blue jeans” and “t-shirt” which was almost impossible to imagine
before a few decades. Besides, there are many more choices of clothing fabrics today than
what it used to before a few decades. Anyway, these changes are not unexpected because
the clothing companies are coming up with newer and newer fashions in order to “break”
into the new market segments.
Q. What is the difference between clothes that young people and old people like to wear?
Answer: As far as I can see, today there is a very small difference, if any at all, between what
young people and old people like to wear. However, it is not unusual to see some old people
still are choosing to wear traditional clothing most of the times while young people have no
interest in wearing them whatsoever. Besides, both the “young” and “old” people today
want more from their lives, and therefore, it is only natural that both generations would
want to bring some “styles” and “colours” in their lives by wearing dresses that are trendy
and fashionable.