RTODfinal Report
RTODfinal Report
Contents
1. Introduction....................................................................................................................................2
2.1 Aims.........................................................................................................................................3
2.2 Objective...................................................................................................................................4
3. Literature Survey...........................................................................................................................5
Paper l..................................................................................................................................................5
Paper ll.................................................................................................................................................6
Paper lll................................................................................................................................................7
Comparative Analysis..........................................................................................................................8
4. Existing System...............................................................................................................................9
5. Problem Statement.......................................................................................................................10
6. Scope..............................................................................................................................................11
7. Proposed System...........................................................................................................................13
7.2 ALGORITHM........................................................................................................................15
8. Planning.........................................................................................................................................21
9. Designing details...........................................................................................................................22
9.1 Coding....................................................................................................................................22
Screenshots........................................................................................................................................26
10. Conclusion.................................................................................................................................27
11. Requirements............................................................................................................................28
12. References..................................................................................................................................29
1. Introduction
1.1 Real Time Object Detection
Object detection is a crucial task in computer vision and has numerous applications,
ranging from surveillance systems to autonomous vehicles. The objective of this mini project
is to develop a system that can accurately detect and localize objects in images using
pretrained deep learning models.
In this report, we will discuss the methodology and results of implementing an object
detection system. The project involves leveraging state-of-the-art deep learning models,
specifically, the Single Shot Multi Box Detector (SSD) model, and applying it to a set of test
images to detect objects of interest.
The primary goal of this project is to gain practical experience in deploying pre-
trained models, understanding the underlying concepts of object detection, and evaluating the
performance of the system. Throughout the report, we will highlight the steps involved in the
implementation process, challenges faced, and solutions derived.
We will also discuss the dataset used for training and evaluation, the metrics utilized
to measure the accuracy of the object detection system, and any limitations encountered in the
project.
Finally, we will analyse the results obtained by the system, compare them with the
ground truth annotations, and provide recommendations for future enhancements or
optimizations. The report will conclude with a summary of the key findings and an assessment
of the overall success of the project.
By the end of this report, readers will have a comprehensive understanding of the
object detection process, the practical considerations involved in implementing a real-world
system, and the potential applications and limitations of the developed solution.
The primary goal of object detection is to provide an automated and efficient solution
that can identify and localize objects in various real-world scenarios. This technology has
numerous applications, including but not limited to:
• Surveillance and security systems: Object detection can be used to monitor and
identify potential threats or suspicious activities in surveillance footage.
• Agriculture: Object detection can be used to monitor crop health, identify weed
growth, and detect pests or diseases in agricultural fields.
The aim of object detection is to develop accurate and efficient algorithms that can
operate in real-time, handle complex scenes, and generalize well to a wide range of objects
and environments.
2.2 Objective
The objectives of object detection can be summarized as follows:
3. Literature Survey
Paper l
Paper Name: You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection
Author Name: Joseph Redmon, Santosh Divvala, Ross Girshick, Ali Farhadi
EXPLANATION:
The authors introduced YOLO to streamline this process. Instead of treating object detection
as a two-stage problem, YOLO framed it as a single regression problem, enabling faster
detection by predicting bounding boxes and class labels in one pass.
The YOLO report introduced a paradigm shift in object detection by prioritizing speed and
simplicity. YOLO’s unified approach demonstrated that object detection models could
achieve real-time performance without the need for complex pipelines, making it one of the
most influential works in the field of computer vision.
Paper ll
Author name: Ross B. Girshick, Jeff Donahue, Trevor Darrell, Jitendra Malik
Explanation:
The main challenge in object detection was efficiently localizing and classifying multiple
objects within an image. R-CNN solved this by focusing on region-based object detection,
combining region proposals and CNN feature extraction.
R-CNN was a landmark model in object detection, introducing the concept of combining
region proposals with deep learning-based feature extraction using CNNs. Its accuracy was
unmatched at the time, though its speed was a major limitation. The model inspired faster and
more efficient variants (Fast R-CNN and Faster R-CNN), which have been widely adopted in
real-world applications. R-CNN’s contributions to the field of computer vision, particularly
object detection, continue to influence modern architectures.
Paper lll
Author Name: Xiaoming Zhou, Xiaoping Li, Yanjie Wang, Qihua Lin.
Explanation:
Traditional object detection models, like R-CNN, SSD, and YOLO, typically rely on
anchor boxes or predefined bounding boxes to detect objects. Anchor-based methods require
the generation of multiple candidate regions or grid cells to locate objects. This process is
computationally expensive and prone to issues like duplicate detections (non-maximal
suppression) and complex hyperparameter tuning.
Comparative Analysis
4. Existing System
Several existing systems and frameworks are widely used for object detection in
computer vision. Here are some of the popular ones as of my last knowledge update in
January 2022:
YOLO is a real-time object detection system that can detect objects in images or video
frames in a single pass. It's known for its speed and accuracy. YOLOv4 and YOLOv5 are
some of the latest versions.
2. Faster R-CNN:
SSD is another single-shot object detection method that is efficient and accurate. It uses
multiple bounding box priors of different scales to detect objects.
4. Retina Net:
Retina Net is designed for accurate object detection. It combines the efficiency of single
shot detectors with the accuracy of two-stage detectors.
5. Mask R-CNN:
Mask R-CNN extends Faster R-CNN by adding a pixel-level mask prediction for each
detected object, allowing instance segmentation in addition to object detection.
6. OpenCV:
OpenCV is an open-source computer vision library that provides pre-trained models for
object detection, including Haar cascades and deep learning-based models.
5. Problem Statement
The problem statement of object detection is to accurately and efficiently identify
and locate objects within an image or video. The goal is to provide a system that can
automatically detect objects of interest and classify them into different categories, while
also providing bounding box coordinates to precisely locate the objects.
Additionally, the system should be able to detect and locate multiple objects within an
image or video simultaneously, as well as handle objects at different scales, orientations,
and aspect ratios. It should also be robust to changes in viewpoint and object deformations.
The goal is to develop object detection systems that can not only achieve high
accuracy but also operate in real-time or near real-time scenarios, making them applicable
to a wide range of applications such as surveillance, autonomous vehicles, robotics, and
augmented reality.
6. Scope
The scope of object detection encompasses various areas, including computer
vision, machine learning, and artificial intelligence. The field has seen significant
advancements in recent years, with the development of numerous algorithms and
techniques. The scope of object detection includes, but is not limited to, the following
aspects:
2. Data Representation: Representing and encoding both the input data (images or
videos) and the output (object detections). This includes the use of various formats such as
image representations (e.g., RGB, grayscale, etc.), bounding box coordinates, and object
labels or categories.
4. Training Data and Annotation: Creating and curating high-quality training datasets
with annotated ground truth information, such as bounding box coordinates and object
labels. This involves collecting or generating diverse and representative data to ensure the
effectiveness and generalization of object detection models.
5. Model Selection and Training: Choosing appropriate models and architectures for
object detection, such as Faster R-CNN, SSD, YOLO, or Retina Net. Training these models
involves optimizing the model parameters using large-scale annotated datasets and
appropriate loss functions, such as mean average precision (MAP), to improve detection
accuracy.
In summary, the scope of object detection is broad and covers various aspects, techniques,
and applications. It involves algorithm development, data representation, training data,
model selection and training, evaluation, efficient implementation, and application-specific
customization.
7. Proposed System
Data Collection and Preprocessing: Gather a diverse dataset of images or videos that
represent the objects you want to detect. Preprocess the data by resizing images,
normalizing pixel values, and augmenting the dataset to increase variability.
Annotation: Annotate the collected data with bounding box coordinates and object
labels using annotation tools. This step provides ground truth information for training the
object detection model.
Model Selection: Choose a suitable object detection model based on your
requirements, such as Faster R-CNN, SSD, YOLO, or RetinaNet. Consider factors like
detection accuracy, inference speed, and computational resources available.
Training: Split the annotated dataset into training and validation sets. Train the object
detection model using the training set, optimizing the model parameters with a suitable
loss function like the focal loss or the smooth L1 loss. Experiment with different
hyperparameters to achieve the best performance.
Model Evaluation: Evaluate the trained model's performance on the validation set
using evaluation metrics like mAP, precision, and recall. Adjust model hyperparameters or
try different models if necessary to improve performance.
Model Optimization: Apply optimization techniques to improve the model's efficiency
and speed. For example, you can use model pruning, quantization, or model compression
techniques like knowledge distillation to reduce the model's size without significant loss in
accuracy.
User Interface: This component is responsible for presenting the app's interface to the
user. It includes various screens such as login, search, and results. This component
interacts with the backend via API calls.
Backend: This component is responsible for processing the user's requests and
generating responses. It includes business logic and communicates with the database
and college API.
Server: This component runs the backend and serves as the interface between the user
interface and the backend.
Database: This component stores the app's data, including user data, college data, and
search history.
7.2 ALGORITHM
import cv2
conf_thresh = 0.5
nms_thresh = 0.4
video_capture = cv2.VideoCapture(0)
while True:
if not ret:
break
results = model(preprocessed_frame)
frame)
ord('q'):
break
video_capture.release()
cv2.destroyAllWindows()
MATHEMATICAL MODEL
These values can be normalized to be relative to the image width and height. For
example, if the image is of size W×H, the normalized bounding box coordinates bi′ ′
3. Confidence Score.
The confidence score sis_isi is the probability of the detected object being the correct
class. It is computed through the classification model’s confidence for the predicted class
ci
4. Loss function
In real-time object detection models, such as YOLO, the total loss is a combination of:
Fowchart
fig.8 1Flowchart
8. Planning
9. Designing details
9.1 Coding
import cv2
import numpy as np
# Load YOLO
model def
load_yolo():
layer_names = net.getLayerNames()
net.setInput(blob)
detections = net.forward(output_layers)
boxes = []
confidences = []
class_ids = []
scores = detection[5:]
class_id = np.argmax(scores)
confidence = scores[class_id]
w = int(detection[2] * width)
h = int(detection[3] * height)
x = int(center_x - w / 2)
y = int(center_y - h / 2)
boxes.append([x, y, w, h])
confidences.append(float(confidence))
class_ids.append(class_id)
font = cv2.FONT_HERSHEY_PLAIN
if len(indexes) > 0:
for i in indexes.flatten():
x, y, w, h = boxes[i]
label = str(classes[class_ids[i]])
color = colors[class_ids[i]]
def start_video_detection():
cap = cv2.VideoCapture(0) # Use 0 for webcam, or replace with video file path
while True:
if not ret:
break
# Perform detection
break
cap.release()
cv2.destroyAllWindows()
start_video_detection()
Screenshots
10. Conclusion
Real-time object detection is a transformative technology that has applications in various
fields such as surveillance, autonomous vehicles, robotics, and augmented reality. By
leveraging advanced deep learning models like YOLO, real-time object detection allows
systems to identify and track objects in live video streams with high accuracy and speed.
The integration of pre-trained models with efficient algorithms enables detection systems to
process images and videos in real time, making them suitable for practical deployment in
dynamic environments. Despite challenges like handling occlusion, varying lighting
conditions, and real-time performance constraints, continuous improvements in neural
network architectures and hardware acceleration (such as GPUs) are pushing the boundaries
of what’s possible in this field.
In summary, real-time object detection offers a powerful combination of accuracy and speed,
which is essential for developing intelligent systems capable of interacting with and
interpreting the visual world as it happens.
11. Requirements
11.1 Hardware Requirements
System : Intel(R) Core (TM) i5-9300H CPU @ 2.40GHz
Ram : 2 GB.
Database : MySQL
12. References
[1] Analogy. Wikipedia, Mar 2018.
[2] M. Everingham, L. Van Gool, C. K. Williams, J. Winn, and A. Zisserman. The pascal
visual object classes (voc) challenge. International journal of computer vision, 88(2):303–
338, 2010.
[3] A. Shrivastava, R. Sukthankar, J. Malik, and A. Gupta. Beyond skip connections: Top
down modulation for object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.06851, 2016.
[5] T.-Y. Lin, M. Maire, S. Belongie, J. Hays, P. Perona, D. Ramanan, P. Dollar, and C. L.
Zitnick. Microsoft coco: Com- ´ mon objects in context. In European conference on computer
vision, pages 740–755. Springer, 2014.
[6] T.-Y. Lin, M. Maire, S. Belongie, J. Hays, P. Perona, D. Ramanan, P. Dollar, and C. L.
Zitnick. Microsoft coco: Com- ´ mon objects in context. In European conference on computer
vision, pages 740–755. Springer, 2014.
[7] J. Redmon and A. Farhadi. Yolo9000: Better, faster, stronger. In Computer Vision and
Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2017 IEEE Conference on, pages 6517–6525. IEEE, 2017. 1, 2,
3 [16] J. Redmon and A. Farhadi. Yolov3: An incremental improvement. arXiv, 2018.
[8] O. Russakovsky, L.-J. Li, and L. Fei-Fei. Best of both worlds: human-machine
collaboration for object annotation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer
Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 2121–2131, 2015.