Visual Cobol Vs MF Cobol Vs Native Cobol
Visual Cobol Vs MF Cobol Vs Native Cobol
NATIVE COBOL
https://www.techtarget.com/
searchdatacenter/feature/
COBOL-VS-COBOL-II-and-
MFCOBOL-Whats-the-difference
- The specific name for these compilers was the
OS/VS COBOL Compiler
- It was quite cumbersome when it came to
addressability, using a facility called BLL cells,
and had other limitations.
- . VS COBOL II (5668-958) replaced OS/VS
COBOL in the early to mid-eighties, and it
provided 31-bit addressing as well as changing
the language structure to make addressability
easier through the use of pointers and other
facilities. The migration was not transparent in
most cases, though, and often some degree of
application code modifications were required to
upgrade to VS COBOL II.
- VS COBOL II was replaced with COBOL for MVS
& VM (5688-197), then COBOL for OS/390 & VM
(5648-A25) and the current version of COBOL is
called Enterprise COBOL for z/OS & OS/390
(5655-G53). Like OS/VS COBOL, VS COBOL II is no
longer supported by IBM, and equivalent runtime
capability is provided in Language Environment.
3. MFCOBOL is a generic term for the COBOL
provided by MicroFocus through the use of
compilers built into such products as Micro Focus
Mainframe Express, Micro Focus Object COBOL
Developer Suite, and Micro Focus Revolve. These
products are much more than just compilers and
libraries; they include a variety of development
tools in addition, all packaged together. You
cannot order MFCOBOL by itself.