Cambridge International AS Level: German Language 8683/03

Cambridge International AS Level
GERMAN LANGUAGE 8683/03

Paper 3 Essay May/June 2024
MARK SCHEME
Maximum Mark: 40
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the May/June 2024 series for most
Cambridge IGCSE, Cambridge International A and AS Level and Cambridge Pre-U components, and some
Cambridge O Level components.
This document consists of 3 printed pages.
© Cambridge University Press & Assessment 2024 [Turn over

8683/03 Cambridge International AS Level – Mark Scheme May/June 2024
PUBLISHED
Generic Marking Principles
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers.
They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level
descriptions for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these
marking principles.
GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 1:
Marks must be awarded in line with:
 the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
 the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
 the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
Marks must be awarded positively:
 marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit
is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme,
referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
 marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
 marks are not deducted for errors
 marks are not deducted for omissions
 answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these
features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The
meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed
instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question
(however; the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate
responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
© Cambridge University Press & Assessment 2024 Page 2 of 3

8683/03 Cambridge International AS Level – Mark Scheme May/June 2024
PUBLISHED
Language (out of 24) Content (out of 16)
21–24 Very good 14–16 Very good
Confident use of complex sentence patterns, Detailed, clearly relevant and well illustrated;
generally accurate, extensive vocabulary, good coherently argued and structured.
sense of idiom.
16–20 Good 11–13 Good
Generally sound grasp of grammar in spite of Sound knowledge and generally relevant; some
quite a few lapses; reads reasonably; some ability to develop argument and draw
attempt at varied vocabulary. conclusions.
10–15 Adequate 7–10 Adequate
A tendency to be simple, clumsy or laboured; Some knowledge, but not always relevant; a
some degree of accuracy; inappropriate use of more limited capacity to argue
idiom.
5–9 Poor 3–6 Poor
Consistently simple or pedestrian sentence Some attempt at argument, tends to be sketchy

patterns with persistent errors; limited or unspecific; little attempt to structure an
vocabulary. argument; major misunderstanding of question.
0–4 Very poor 0–2 Very poor
Only the simplest sentence patterns, little evidence Vague and general, ideas presented at random.
of grammatical awareness, very limited
vocabulary.
Essays which address the broad topic area but relate to the exact essay title/question only in places
will be awarded content marks in the ‘poor’ band, with access to the full range of marks for language.
Essays which address the broad topic area but do not relate in any way to the exact essay
title/question will be awarded 0 marks for content and 0 marks for language.
© Cambridge University Press & Assessment 2024 Page 3 of 3

Cambridge International AS Level: German Language 8683/03

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cambridge International AS Level: German Language 8683/03

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cambridge International AS Level: German Language 8683/03

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cambridge International AS Level

GERMAN LANGUAGE 8683/03

This document consists of 3 printed pages.

© Cambridge University Press & Assessment 2024 [Turn over

Generic Marking Principles

GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 1:

Marks must be awarded in line with:

GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 2:

GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 3:

Marks must be awarded positively:

GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 4:

GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 5:

GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 6:

© Cambridge University Press & Assessment 2024 Page 2 of 3

Language (out of 24) Content (out of 16)

21–24 Very good 14–16 Very good

16–20 Good 11–13 Good

10–15 Adequate 7–10 Adequate

5–9 Poor 3–6 Poor

Consistently simple or pedestrian sentence Some attempt at argument, tends to be sketchy

0–4 Very poor 0–2 Very poor

© Cambridge University Press & Assessment 2024 Page 3 of 3

You might also like