Pariyerum Perumal On The Caste Reality o
Pariyerum Perumal On The Caste Reality o
Pariyerum Perumal On The Caste Reality o
HOME ASSERTION FEATURES PERSPECTIVE RIGHTS HISTORY THE SHARED MIRROR LANGUAGES
Home Assertion Pariyerum Perumal: On the caste reality of South Tamil Nadu
AS S ERT I ON
Pariyerum
Perumal:
On the
caste reality
of South
Tamil Nadu
by Deivendra Kumar A on
October 5, 2021 0
Deivendra Kumar A
Indian cinema, born under the clutches of imperialism, had undoubtedly maintained the space or difference between the elites and the
marginalised. In recent years, the audience as well as the cinema industry have made a gradual but apparent shift in the screen space
for sharing the voice of the voiceless in mainstream cinema and celebrating identity and in understanding film critically.
Caste has been considered as one of the elements of oppression in the society. Caste stratification attached with religion, particularly
the varna system in Hinduism, is undeniably a benchmark of the Hindu society to establish caste differentiation. When it comes to Tamil
Cinema, it showcased caste either as glorification of the elites and intermediate castes or as eradication of the prevailing caste system.
Many scholars in the domain of caste and cinema opine that films try to eradicate caste dominance between the higher and submissive
Tamil cinema maintained a space and difference in terms of projecting the dominant and the subaltern classes through the cinematic
medium. It represented the subaltern as a sidelined body who is submissive and impure; whereas the dominant- intermediate castes
are heroic characters with imaginary heroism – lordly, generous, fearless, assertive, violent and even as trouble-makers. It is similar to
the Gramscian thought of hegemony and counter-hegemony, the dominant caste holds the hegemony and the narratives of subaltern
caste groups in Tamil Cinema hold the counter-hegemony. Many scholars in this realm of caste and Tamil Cinema have used the
‘common-sense theory’ of Antonio Gramsci to critically analyse subalternity in Tamil Cinema. Though, the word ‘subaltern’ was first used
by Gramsci, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak affirms in her much acclaimed essay ‘Can the subaltern speak?’ that “subaltern is not just a
classy word for oppressed, for others, for somebody who is not getting a piece of the pie”.
It has been three years since the release of the film Periyerum Perumal. The film is still relevant and strong because it showcased the
vile side of caste which is deeply entrenched in society, manifesting in the socio-political and cultural elements of south Tamil Nadu. The
entire film pivoted around the Tirunelveli and Thoothukudi regions of southern Tamil Nadu, regions considered as the landscape of caste
clashes and violence between the land-owning intermediate castes and the oppressed lower castes. It is very apparent in Tamil cinema
that these southern regions of Tamil Nadu are portrayed as paramount in case of dominant-hegemony where intermediate caste groups
perpetrate acts of violence, victimising the lower caste marginal groups. The celebration of these south regions as the realm of the
Thevar caste groups is very clearly shown in the Tamil films like Karimedu Karuvayan (1985), Thevar Magan (1992), Paruthiveeran
embedded in their lives, and they also try to depict this culture through cinema. This is very apparent in the success of Dravidian politics
Pariyerum Perumal (a folk god who mounts on a steed) is a caste narrative which intensely showcases the reality and incivility existing
in a caste-ridden society where the people are classified on the basis of caste, creed and colour, clustered as the intermediate caste and
the oppressed caste in south Tamil Nadu. Since it narrates a caste ideology, it never tried to explicitly represent the dominant and the
oppressed caste groups. There are many other Tamil films which directly mentioned the caste names as well as acts of dominance and
violence towards the oppressed communities. The success of the ace filmmaker Pa. Ranjith and his films, lauded by critics, paved way
for the entry of Dalit characters into Tamil cinema from the past decade. It made an unparalleled revamp in Kollywood film industry by
representing the life of the oppressed on the silver screen by connecting them with Ambedkar-Phule ideologies and demolishing their
Pariyerum Perumal can be defined as an artistic masterpiece, representing the subaltern voice as well as showcasing the odious side of
The songs and the subtle (metaphoric and symbolic) representation of caste reality makes the film all the more poetic and a treat for
the eyes. The film has represented the extremities of dominant-intermediate and subaltern castes through various symbolic and
metaphoric elements using visuals, songs, lyrics, bodily codes, caste icons, and symbols, etc. The submissive caste groups can be
identified through differences in worship (Folk-god worship), village names, dialect, as victimes of the double-tumbler system etc. The
assertive dialogues laced with rhetoric associated with the Viduthalai Chiruthaikal Katchi (VCK) (Liberation Panthers Party) of the
The subaltern castes celebrate Ambedkar as their caste icon in various scenes of the film, the lyrics mention exterminated habitats and
spatial differences that mark the lower castes in the villages of Tamil Nadu. The folk song “Engum Pugazh Thuvange” performed by
Pariyan’s father, Puliyankulam Selvaraj, is a direct representation of caste and identity through the folk medium, where it actually
portrays the life of Immanuel Sekaran, a dedicated leader and icon of the Pallar community (Dalits) in Tamil Nadu.
The director Mari Selvaraj has used popular songs from other Tamil films, composed by Maestro Ilayaraaja to portray the soundscape of
caste in the villages. The song used in the scene where the protagonist Pariyerum Perumal escapes from the higher-caste thugs,
“Poradada! Por Valendhada”, is a popular song from the movie Alai Osai (1985, Sirumughai Ravi). It indicates the Dalit identity, serves
as a spatial marker as well invoke their soundscape. This particular song has connotations of Dalit identity, specifically that of the Pallar
caste. The dialogues like “Yeru pudicha kayyila naanum Vaazh pidichavanthan” (“My hands held the plough, but it also wielded swords”)
brings a healthy discussion of equality and commemorates the clan history of the Dalits.
The film also tried to represent real-life incidents that happened in Tamil Nadu where the people of the Dalit community were exploited
by the dominance of hegemonic caste groups as well as the authorities under the Dravidian party rule. It subtly showcased the incidents
of Ilavarasan’s honour killing in Dharmapuri, the Keezhvenmani massacre, Manjolai Massacre, unethical media reportage of K R
Narayanan’s demise, Kodiyankulam police riots, contentious worship in the cart festival of Kandadevi Temple, etc.
Similarly, the higher castes: particularly dominant-intermediate castes are represented through celebration of Aruvals (sickle), and
Silambam (martial sticks) as bodily codes representing the Thevar caste groups. Many scholars in the domain of sociology and cultural
studies postulate that the celebration and usage of sickles are attributred to the hegemonic Thevar caste as signs of their imaginary
martial heroism or supremacy of gore, valour, and suppression of submissive castes. ‘Sundaralingam’, belonging to the so-called
intermediate caste, twirls his moustache with caste pride during the clash with the protagonist. It makes clear that the Thevar caste
groups (intermediate caste) in Tamil Nadu, consider moustache as an indicator of social and caste power, embedded with their honour
and pride.
This film also showcased the caste violence over the disfiguring of the statues of Ambedkar and Muthuramalinga Thevar – the former a
social revolutionary projected as a caste leader while the latter, a caste leader, glorified as a social reformer. It also depicted the reality
of caste through coloured wrist bands used by the respective caste groups: wristband of red and yellow for the Thevars and bands with
green and red for the Dalits. They indicate both caste identity, and discrimination.
Even though these elements can be analysed from the film, it never tries to explicitly present caste. The debutant filmmaker Mari
Selvaraj asks the society and people to rethink about the extreme forms of prejudice existing in our society. This film is an intense
portrayal of the caste-ridden society in which the dominant and hegemonic caste groups unleash acts of victimisation, exploitation, and
humiliation at different levels against the vulnerable, gullible, and marginalised Dalits.
~~~
Deivendra Kumar A was a postgraduate in Mass Communication from Central University of Tamil Nadu.
Mail:[email protected]
Share
AS S ERT I ON
Popular Articles...
AS S ERT I ON
Ethnocracy invading Babasaheb’s Savarna Subversion of Reservation Toilet woman of India: e woman
democracy: World Ine uality Narendra Modi is scared of
Report-2022
ABOUT US
‘If the Untouchables make no noise, the Hindu feels no shame for their condition and is quite indifferent as to their numbers. Whether they are
thousands or millions of them, he does not care to bother. But if the Untouchables rise and ask for recognition, he is prepared to deny their
existence, repudiate his responsibility and refuse to share his power without feeling any compunction or remorse.’
~ Dr. B. R. Ambedkar.
Round Table India believes this is the Ambedkar Age, the age of rising and working towards reshaping society in the light of the Ambedkarite ideals of
Liberty, Equality and Fraternity. As a news and information portal, Round Table India aims to focus on the twin objectives of generating information and
interaction necessary to aid, in howsoever small way, the progress of the Dalits, and the Bahujan community at large, in their efforts to realize those ideals,
to work for an informed Ambedkar Age.
Round Table India recognizes that Indian media has played a signi cant role in helping the dominant social forces ‘deny the existence’ of untouchability
and caste and ‘repudiate their responsibility’ in building and maintaining an unjust social order. It has consistently promoted the project of twisting the
‘Hindu problem’, as Dr. Ambedkar had once observed, into the ‘Dalit problem’. Both the mainstream and so-called alternative media in India are
controlled by the same social forces. When others interpret the world for you, can you change it?
Round Table India stream media, piecing together current information on society, politics and policy of interest to the Dalit-Bahujan world. Concurrently,
Round Table India shall also seek to nd and highlight the Dalit-Bahujan perspective on those and other issues: their own attempts to make sense of the
world, to interpret it. In short, Round Table India shall function as an uniquely Dalit-Bahujan media actor that perceives through their eyes and ears, and
speaks through their voice.
To its readers and users, Round Table India shall be a platform, a resource and a tool. As a platform, it offers an integrated online space for the widest
expression of Dalit-Bahujan voices. Through regular columns on news and current issues, blogs, multimedia articulation and even creative writing in the
form of poetry, short ction and non- ction on subjects of literary interest.
Round Table India shall be resource, a library of sorts, for young Dalit-Bahujans who seek to gain from the knowledge and experience of intellectuals,
writers and activists of a similar background. It shall also make available for them the writings of such pioneering thinkers as Dr. Ambedkar and Phule, and
help them delve into Dalit history, events, movements and personalities to understand the current age better.
Lastly, Round Table India shall serve as a tool for young Dalits to interact with each other: through helping them connect with each other, facilitating
debates and discussions of interest to them.