Artikel Pembuatan Permen Lunak Kayu Manis
Artikel Pembuatan Permen Lunak Kayu Manis
Artikel Pembuatan Permen Lunak Kayu Manis
Volume 13, Number 2, October 2024 | Pages: 415-421 | DOI: 10.14421/biomedich.2024.132.415-421 ISSN 2540-9328 (online)
Erwin Setiawan, Rizky Muliani Dwi Ujianti*, Iffah Muflihati, Arief Rakhman Affandi
Food Technology Department, Engineering and Informatics Faculty, Universitas PGRI Semarang, Jl. Sidodadi No. 24, Semarang, Indonesia.
Corresponding author*
[email protected]
Manuscript received: 06 July, 2024. Revision accepted: 07 October, 2024. Published: 09 October, 2024.
Abstract
Jelly candy is a product that has the characteristics of being chewy and varied in texture. Carrageenan, an alternative natural raw material
as a gelling agent in jelly candy, is one of the producers of red seaweed carrageenan because it has a very complex composition.
Cinnamon contains about 91.88-94.19% cinnamaldehyde as an antioxidant compound. The study aimed to determine the value of the
antioxidant activity obtained and the correlation between the cinnamon powder jelly candy Koerintji variety and the addition of red
seaweed carrageenan with different concentration variations. The study was conducted using a completely randomized design with two
factors. Carrageenan concentrations consist of 3.5% and 5%. The results showed that the concentration of red seaweed carrageenan
significantly affected the antioxidant activity value and characteristics of cinnamon jelly candy. The best treatment was obtained at a
concentration of 1.5% cinnamon and 5% red seaweed carrageenan with chemical characteristics water content 11.49%, antioxidant
activity 50.26%, pH value 4.82%, physical characteristics colour (brightness) 40.72%, texture hardness 2.3%, adhesiveness 3.1%,
elasticity 2.76%, colour preference 4.66%, aroma preference, 4.32%, flavour preference 4.66%, elasticity texture preference 4.56%, taste
4.80%, and overall 4.04%.
exceeding the SNI No. Standard. 06-3734-2006, namely Jelly candy making
50%. From the various explanations above, it is The procedure carried out in making jelly candy is
necessary to develop finished products that contain adding cinnamon extract, which includes several stages:
antioxidants due to people's lifestyle changes, such as preparation of ingredients, cooking, moulding, cooling,
consuming foods that contain lots of fat and oil. This and drying. Making cinnamon jelly candy refers to the
causes free radicals to form in the body. modified (Marfungah et al., 2019) method, namely 45%
sucrose and 40% fructose syrup, then heated at 80°C
with the addition of 3.5% and 5% carrageenan, adding
MATERIALS AND METHODS cinnamon powder according to the treatment. (0.5%, 1%,
and 1.5%) Moreover, 1% citric acid while stirring. After
Material mixing the ingredients evenly, the ingredients are poured
into the prepared mould. Then, leave it for 10 minutes at
The main ingredients used in this research were room temperature and put it in the refrigerator for 24
cinnamon of the Koerintji Variety obtained from Lempur hours until it solidifies and jelly candy forms. After that,
Tengah Village, Gunung Raya District, Kerinci Regency, the jelly candy was heated using a cabinet dryer at 50°C
Jambi Province, and red seaweed (Eucheuma cottoni sp.) for 6 hours.
obtained from coastal seaweed farmers in Ritabel
Village, District North Tanimbar, West Southeast Physicochemical characteristic test
Maluku Regency, sucrose (Rose Brand), fructose The physio-chemical characteristics of jelly candy
(Merck), citric acid (Merck). Meanwhile, the materials observed were water content, pH test, and texture test
used for chemical analysis include 2,2-diphenyl-1- based on the method (Marfungah et al., 2019).
picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), methanol (Merck), KOH
(Merck), and distilled water (Merck). Antioxidant activity test
A chemical test of the antioxidant activity (Miranti et al.,
Procedures 2017) of cinnamon powder jelly candy and red seaweed
The research was divided into three stages: making carrageenan using the DPPH method based on the
cinnamon powder, carrageenan, and jelly candy. Jelly method.
candy was made using a factorial Completely
Randomized Design (CRD) with two treatment factors: Preparation of sample solution
cinnamon powder concentrations of 0.5%, 1%, and 1.5% Weigh 5 grams of cinnamon candy and then dissolve it
and red seaweed carrageenan concentrations of 3.5% and using 50 mL of distilled water in a measuring flask up to
5%. Each treatment was carried out with three the mark until the jelly candy dissolves.
repetitions.
Preparation of 1.2 mM DPPH solution
Making cinnamon powder 4.8 mg of DPPH powder was weighed and put into a 20
The process of making cinnamon powder (Marfungah et mL measuring flask. The powder was dissolved in
al., 2019) with modifications: Cinnamon is cut into ± 1 methanol p.a. to the extent of the miniscus and then
cm pieces and dried in a cabinet dryer at 50°C for 8 homogenized until homogeneous.
hours. After drying, the cinnamon is then reduced in size
by blending it until it becomes powder and then sifting it Preparation of control solution
with a 60 mesh sieve until cinnamon powder is obtained. A total of 0.8 mL of 1.2 mM DPPH solution was pipetted
and put into a test tube. Add 3 mL of distilled water, then
Making carrageenan homogenize. The control solution was incubated at 25-
The red seaweed is washed with running water until 30˚C (room temperature) for 30 minutes (the reaction
clean, then put into a basin and soaked in a KOH solution tube was wrapped in aluminium foil). Then, the
containing 1,840 mL (92%) and 160 g (32%) of distilled solution's absorbance was measured on a UV-Vis
water. The function of KOH in cooling aims to reduce spectrophotometer (Spectroquant prove 300) with a
the content of other elements, such as salts and cellulose, wavelength of 517 nm.
contained in seaweed. The red seaweed is soaked for 2
hours, then after soaking, the seaweed is rewashed with Preparation of test samples with various concentrations
running water until clean, then the seaweed is tested for 8 mL of the diluted sample solution was taken, then put
pH using a PH-2011 pH meter until it obtains a pH value into a 20 mL measuring flask and added with distilled
of 7 (neutral). The red seaweed is reduced in size to ± 4 water to the mark. Next, 1 mL, 2 mL, 3 mL, 4 mL, and 5
cm in length. After reducing the size, place the red mL of this solution are taken. Distilled water was added
seaweed in a baking dish and dry it in a cabinet dryer at a up to 20 mL to obtain test solutions with different
temperature of 50°C for 24 hours. The dried red seaweed concentration variations.
is blended until smooth and then sieved using a 60-mesh
sieve until red seaweed carrageenan powder is obtained.
Setiawan et al. – Physicochemical candy cinnamon seaweed carrageenan. 417
Water content(%)
radicals. In a test tube, a 3 mL sample was added to a 0.8
mL, 1.2 mM methanol DPPH solution. Then, it was 15,00 12.78a 11.94a
vortexed for 3 minutes and incubated at room
temperature in dark conditions for 30 minutes. Next, the 10,00
sample's absorbance was measured using a UV-Vis
spectrophotometer (spectroquant prove 300) at a 5,00
wavelength of 517 nm. Controls were made the same
way using distilled water as a substitute for the sample. 0,00
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6
IC50 is calculated using a linear regression equation,
with sample concentration as the y-axis. From the Formulation
equation y = ax + b, it can be obtained that the IC50
Figure 1. Jelly candy water content test results.
value is the same as the x value.
Description: F1 (0.5% cinnamon, 3.5% carrageenan), F2 (0.5%
Sensory Test cinnamon, 5% carrageenan), F3 (1% cinnamon, 3.5%
Testing was conducted descriptively (on a scale of 1-7) carrageenan), F4 (1% cinnamon, 5% carrageenan), F5 (1.5%
on cinnamon jelly candy with 50 untrained panellists. cinnamon, 3.5% carrageenan), F6 (1.5% cinnamon, 5%
carrageenan). (Values followed by different letter notations in the
This test includes brown color, cinnamon aroma, flavor, diagram indicate significantly different values) (One Way
sweet taste, cinnamon taste, aftertaste, elasticity, ANOVA Test, α = 0.05%/ F1 (0.5% cinnamon, 3.5%
stickiness, and brightness. carrageenan), F2 (0.5% cinnamon, 5% carrageenan), F3 (1%
cinnamon, 3.5% carrageenan), F4 (1% cinnamon, 5%
Data analysis carrageenan), F5 (1.5% cinnamon, 3.5% carrageenan), F6 (1.5%
ANOVA and Duncan’s advanced test were used in cinnamon, 5% carrageenan). Letter notations on the diagram
indicate significant differences) (One Way ANOVA test, = 0.05%
statistical analysis. The software used in this test is SPSS
24.
Figure 1 shows that the higher the concentration of
carrageenan, the resulting product will have a low water
content, and adding a low concentration of carrageenan
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
will result in a high water content. This is because
Physicochemical Characteristics carrageenan can bind large amounts of water; the
Water content literature states that carrageenan has hydrocolloid
The results of variance testing showed that the addition properties that can bind water. The water content of jelly
of carrageenan had a significant difference in the water candy is determined by the processing process, especially
content of cinnamon jelly candy. Figure 1 shows the during the cooking and drying of moulded jelly candy
values obtained between 11.94% - 22.84%. Formulation products (Bactiar et al., 2017). The product produced on
1 obtained a value of 22.84%, formulation 2 17.20%, average is by the standard. That is, it should be at most
formulation 3 20.16%, formulation 4 12.78%, 20%. However, in formulation 1, the results are not by
formulation 5 17.90%, and formulation 6 11.94%. The the standard, namely 22.84%; this is because the
lowest average water content value obtained in the F6 formulation uses a cinnamon raw material concentration
treatment was 11.94%. The highest water content of jelly of 0, 5%, and 3.5% carrageenan and uses 20% water to
candy was obtained in the F1 treatment, with a value of dissolve all the jelly candy raw materials. A high water
22.84%. In the one-way test results, the water content of content produces a high value in jelly candy products
jelly candy formulations 1 and 3 showed a significant because the substance contains too much water, and the
difference, whereas in formulations 2 and 5, formulations dissolved solids during the processing process are too
4 and 6, there was no significant difference. The low. Hence, the consistency value could be more
differences in each sample are due to the differences in substantial. The gel-forming consistency has too few
concentration in each jelly candy formulation, so testing components, causing the tissue in the jelly candy product
the water content using the wet basis method shows not to be strong enough to hold the liquid sugar, which
fundamental differences in the effect of each causes the jelly candy to experience syneresis and
formulation. Below is data from water content research produce a high water content value (Rismandari et al.,
using the wet basis method, presented in Figure 1. 2017). According to (Atmaka et al., 2013), gel formation
is a phenomenon of cross-linking between polymer
chains, resulting in the formation of a three-dimensional
mesh with continuity. Then, this mesh can catch the
water, which causes the formation of a solid and rigid
structure in the resulting product.
418 Biology, Medicine, & Natural Product Chemistry 13 (2), 2024: 415-421
3
volume to decrease. In the opinion of (Bahri et al., 2020)
an increase in the water content value can cause a
2 decrease in the elasticity value, where the water
1 component in the product will diffuse into the gel so that
0
the gel forms to become soft and cause the elasticity to
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 decrease. Data from testing the texture value of the
elasticity parameter is presented in Figure 3.
Formulation
Figure 2. Jelly candy pH test results. 3,5
3 2.63c 2.76c
F1 (0.5% cinnamon, 3.5% carrageenan), F2 (0.5% cinnamon, 5% 2.37b
2,5
Elasticity (%)
IC50 (ppm)
obtained in formulation 6. This value also correlated with
the water content value, where formulation 1 had the 40
highest water content, and formulation 6 obtained the
lowest water content value. This is reinforced by the 20
opinion of (Novitasari et al., 2016), who stated that the 0
water content value could influence the elasticity value F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6
of the jelly candy product produced. It can be seen from Formulation
this research that the more the water content increases,
the more elasticity the jelly candy will reduce. Figure 4. Antioxidant activity test results.
processing black cumin jelly candy, namely cooking, and consumers are then instructed to choose one example
drying. they like from several examples presented. The data in
(Table 1) shows no real difference in color parameters.
Sensory Test This shows that formulation 1, formulation 2, and
This hedonic sensory testing method using 50 untrained formulation 4 are the colours the panelists prefer.
panelists is used to determine the subjective attitudes of Meanwhile, formulation 3, formulation 5, and
panelists or potential consumers towards a product formulation 5 show the neutral value chosen by the
produced and assessed based on organoleptic parameters. panellists. However, the highest score was obtained for
The results obtained are in the form of acceptance formulation 2, which shows that the panelists liked the
(accepted or rejected), liking (level of like/dislike), and jelly candy product formulation 2 with a formulation of
choice (choose one over another) towards the product 0.5% cinnamon and 5% carrageenan. Data from hedonic
(Oktafa et al., 2017). This test is usually carried out by sensory testing results are in Table 1.
comparison to the test of choice. Panellists or potential
Description: F1 (0.5% cinnamon, 3.5% carrageenan), F2 (0.5% cinnamon, 5% carrageenan), F3 (1% cinnamon, 3.5% carrageenan), F4
(1% cinnamon, 5% carrageenan), F5 (1.5% cinnamon, 3.5% carrageenan), F6 (1.5% cinnamon, 5% carrageenan). (Values followed by
letters that are not the same in the diagram indicate significantly different values and not significantly different values) (One Way
ANOVA Test, α = 0.05%)/ F1 (0.5% cinnamon, 3.5% carrageenan), F2 (0.5% cinnamon, 5% carrageenan), F3 (1% cinnamon, 3.5%
carrageenan), F4 (1% cinnamon, 5% carrageenan), F5 (1.5% cinnamon, 3.5% carrageenan), F6 (1.5% cinnamon, 5% carrageenan).
(Values followed by unequal letter notations on the diagram indicate significant differences) (One Way ANOVA Test, = 0.05%)
The panelists' overall assessment of the organoleptic Acknowledgements: The author would like to thank all
test includes cinnamon jelly candy's colour, taste, aroma, parties who have helped in this research.
and texture. Parameter numbers 1 (dislike very much), 2
(dislike), 3 (dislike somewhat), 4 (neutral), 5 (somewhat Authors’ Contributions: Conceptualization, ES.;
like), 6 (like), 7 (like very much). The results of the methodology, E.S..; software, I.M.; validation, A.R.A;
overall assessment by the panellists in the organoleptic formal analysis, I.M.; resources, R,M.D.U; data curation,
test on the color, taste, aroma, and texture of jelly candy A.R.A.; carried out the laboratory work: E.S, writing—
can be seen in (Table 1) which has been statistically original draft preparation, E.S.; writing—review and
tested using the One Way method (α=0.05%) and does editing, R.M.D.U.; visualization, E.S.; supervision,
not show any fundamental differences between the R.M.D.U, I.M. and A.R.A.; project administration, E.S.;
cinnamon breeds. Jelly candy in various formulations. funding acquisition, E.S. All authors read and approved
However, the highest overall favorability rating was the final version of the manuscript
obtained for F1, namely 5.14. In this formulation, the
components consist of 0.5% cinnamon and 3.5% Competing Interests: The authors declare that there are
carrageenan, thus showing that the product that the no competing interests.
panelists prefer is F1.
REFERENCES
CONCLUSIONS
Amelia, R., & Tanod, W. A. (2016). Kandungan Antioksidan Alga
The chemical properties of cinnamon jelly candy change Merah Eucheuma cottonii dengan Metode Pengeringan yang
Berbeda. KAUDERNI: Journal of Fisheries, Marine and
with the addition of varying concentrations of red
Aquatic Science, 1(1), 14–20.
seaweed carrageenan. The antioxidant test with a https://doi.org/10.47384/kauderni.v1i1.7
substantial value is formulation 6, with a value of Andriyanto, A., Andriani, M. A.., & Esti, W. (2014). The
50.26%, adding 1.5% cinnamon and 5% red seaweed Influenced of Cinnamon Extract Addition to Sensory
carrageenan. Characteristic, Antioxidant Activity and Antibacterial Activity
Setiawan et al. – Physicochemical candy cinnamon seaweed carrageenan. 421
on Salted Egg During Storage in Method Wet Salting. Jurnal Terhadap Karakteristik Kimia dan Organoleptik Permen Jelly
Teknosains Pangan, 2(2), 13–20. Daun Salam (Syzygium polyanthum). Jurnal Sains Dan
Atmaka, W., Nurhartadi, E., & Karim, M. M. (2013). Pengaruh Teknologi Pangan, 4(1), 1944–17956.
Penggunaan Campuran Karaginan Dan Konjak Terhadap Miranti, M., Lohitasari, B., & Amalia, D. R. (2017). Formulasi dan
Karakteristik Permen Jelly Temulawak (Curcuma Aktivitas Antioksidan Permen Jelly Sari Buah Pepaya
Xanthorrhiza Roxb.). Jurnal Teknosains Pangan, 2(2), 66–74. California (Carica papaya L.). Fitofarmaka, 01(1), 1–7.
www.ilmupangan.fp.uns.ac.id Novitasari, M., Mappiratu, & Sulistiawati, D. (2016). Mutu Kimia
Bactiar, A., Ali, A., & Rossi, E. (2017). Jelly Candy Making with Dan Organoleptik Permen Jelly Gelatin Sapi. E-Jurnal Mitra
Red Ginger Extract Addition Carrageenan. JOM Faperta UR, Sains, 4(3), 16–21.
4(1), 3–7. Oktafa, H., Permadi, M. R., & Agustianto, K. (2017). Studi
Bahri, M. A., Dwiloka, B., & Etza Setiani, B. (2020). The Komparasi Data Uji Sensoris Makanan dengan Preference Test
Influence of Brightness, Suppleness, Vitamin C, and (Hedonik dan Mutu Hedonik), antara Algoritma Naïve Bayes
Organoleptic Properties of Lemon Orange Jelly Candy (Citrus Classifier dan Radial Basis Function Network. Seminar
limon). Jurnal Teknologi Pangan, 4(2), 96–102. Nasional Hasil Penelitian, 75–78.
www.ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/tekpangan. Rismandari, M., Agustini, T. W., & Amalia, U. (2017). The
Hayulistya, D., Affandi, D. R., & Sari, A. M. (2021). Influence of Characteristics of Jelly Candy with Addition of Iota
Addition Black Cumin Powder (Nigella sativa) Toward Carrageenan from Seaweed Eucheuma spinosum. Saintek
Antioxidant Activity of The Herbal Jelly Candy. Jurnal Perikanan (Indonesian Journal of Fisheries Science and
Teknosains Pangan, 5(4), 23–30. Technology), 12(2), 103.
Hidayah, R., Harlia, Gusrizal, & Sapar, A. (2013). Optimasi https://doi.org/10.14710/ijfst.12.2.103-108
Konsentrasi Kalium Hidroksida Pada Ekstraksi Karaginan Dari Salamah, E., & Erungan, A. C. (2006). Pemanfaatan Gracilaria sp.
Alga Merah (Kappaphycus. Jurnal Kimia Khatulistiwa, 2(2), Dalam Pembuatan Permen Jelly. Buletin Teknologi Hasil
78–83. Perikanan, IX(1), 38–46.
Lestario, L. N., Sugiarto, S., & Timotius, K. H. (2008). Aktivitas Sukandar, D. (2014). Aktivitas Antioksidan dan Mutu Sensori
Antioksidan dan Kadar Fenolik Total dari Ganggang Merah Formulasi Minuman Fungsional Sawo-Kayu Manis. Jurnal
(Gracilaria verrucosa L.). Jurnal Teknologi Dan Industri Kimia VALENSI, 4(2), 80–89.
Pangan, 19(2), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.15408/jkv.v0i0.3605
Marfungah, N., Tamrin, & Asyik, N. (2019). Pengaruh
Penambahan Bubuk Kayu Manis (Cinnamon burmanii)
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK