Becc-112, 114
Becc-112, 114
Course Coordinator: Sh. Saugato Sen Course Editor: Sh. Saugato Sen
PRINT PRODUCTION
February 2022
© Indira Gandhi National Open University, 2022
ISBN:
All rights reserved. No part of this work may be produced in any form, by mimeography or any other
means, without permission in writings from the Indira Gandhi National Open University.
Further information on the Indira Gandhi National Open University courses may be obtained from the
University’s office at Maidan Garhi, New Delhi -110068 or visit our website: http://www.ignou.ac.in
Printed and published on behalf of the Indira Gandhi National Open University, New Delhi, by Director,
School of Social Sciences.
CONTENTS
BLOCK 1 GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT Page
Unit 1 Concepts indicators and Measurement 7
Glossary 189
The Block has two units, titled Concepts, Indicators and Measurement and
International Comparisons The first Unit is about the concepts of economic
growth and development, their indicators, and the way in which economic growth
and development are usually measured. The second unit describes the story of
economic growth and economic development of certain countries. This is done
with a view to comparing the experiences of these countries so as to attempt to
search for reasons why certain countries are successful in developing more, and
usually, faster.
6
Concept Indicators and
UNIT 1 CONCEPTS INDICATORS AND Measurement
MEASUREMENT
Structure
1.0 Objectives
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Economic Growth: Concept and Measurement
1.2.1 Concept of Economic Growth
1.2.2 Total Output and Output Per Capita
1.2.3 Comparison across Space and Time
1.3 Economic Development and its Indicators
1.4 Characteristics of Developing Nations
1.4.1 Low Per Capita Income
1.4.2 Low Manufacturing Base
1.4.3 Other Features
1.5 Development and Welfare
1.6 The Millennium Development Goals and the Sustainable Development
Goal
1.6.1 The Millennium Development Goals
1.6.2 The Sustainable Development Goals
1.7 Let Us Sum Up
1.8 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises
1.0 OBJECTIVES
The aim of this unit is to acquaint you with the concepts, indicators and
measurement of economic growth and development. After studying this unit, you
should be able to:
Explain what economic growth means
Discuss how economic growth is measured
Explain the meaning of economic development
Discuss how development differs from economic growth; and
Analyse the relationship among the concepts of development and wellbeing
Shri Saugato Sen, Associate Professor, IGNOU, New Delhi
7
Growth and
Development 1.1 INTRODUCTION
This first unit begins your study of the economics of development. You have
studied microeconomics and macroeconomics courses that have equipped you
with concepts and techniques that will help you to understand and gain insights
from a study of economic growth and development. Traditionally, from the time
of Adam Smith, economics was a study of economic growth and development of
nations. The title of Adam Smith’s most well-known book, published in 1776
was An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of Wealth of Nations. Even Karl
Marx contended that his aim was to “study the laws of motion of society”. It was
with the rise of neoclassical Marginalist School that economists shifted their
attention to the study of resource allocation and production, consumption and
exchange at a point of time. Economics focussed on static analysis.
After World War II ended, and European countries had to be rebuilt and put back
on the growth path, economic growth again became a field of study in
Economics.At the same time many formerly colonised economies became
independent. There was a need to understand these economies to suggest ways
and policies for economic development. The study of economic growth also
became subsumed to a large extent within Macroeconomics, while the study of
economic development of the developing nations came to be called Development
Economics or the Economics of Development. Growth Theory also emerged as a
field of study.
This unit aims to begin your acquaintance with the concepts of Development
Economics. The unit discusses the meaning of economic development and how it
differs from growth; what the components of economic development are; what
the relation of development with welfare is; what are the indicators of
development, and so on. The unit begins by explaining the concept of growth and
how growth is measured. It explains how income levels can be compared across
time, and of different countries. Next, the unit takes up for discussion the main
topic of this unit, that is, the meaning of economic development. In doing so, it
explains the characteristics of developing countries, and what it is that makes
them known as ‘developing’ rather than ‘developed’ nation. The unit stresses that
basically, economic development is a much wider concept than economic
growth, that it is multidimensional, and that it is ultimately about the people of a
country or region. The unit finally talks about the relation between development
and wellbeing.
x1 − x0 = Δx/x0 x0
The percentage change in going from x0 to x1 is simply 100 times the
proportionate change:
% Δ x = 100 ( Δ x/x0)
If we assume a constant rate of growth, the formula used for calculating the
growth rate for more than one year is as follows:
10
Concept Indicators and
1.3 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND ITS Measurement
INDICATORS
Economic growth is a necessary but not sufficient condition for improving the
living standards of large numbers of people in countries with low levels of GDP
per capita. It is necessary because, if there is no growth, individuals can become
better off only through transfers of income and assets from others. In a poor
country, even if a small segment of the population is very rich, the potential for
this kind of redistribution is severely limited. Economic growth, by contrast, has
the potential for all people to become much better off without anyone becoming
worse off. Economic growth has led to widespread improvements in living
standards in Botswana, Chile, Estonia, Korea, and many other countries. The
modern economists, however, question this identity between ‘economic growth’
and ‘economic development’; development is not the same as growth. Suppose,
by analogy, we were interested in the difference between ‘growth’ and
‘development’ in human beings. Growth involves change in overall aggregates
such as height or weight, while development includes changes in functional
capacity, of ability to adapt to changing circumstances. Growth is an engine, not
an end in itself. The end is development.
The traditional concept of viewing economic development as synonymous with
economic growth was based on what came to be known as the ‘trickle-down
strategy’, which implies that the effects of rising incomes and output would
ultimately trickle down to the poor so that they would benefit poor as well as the
rich. The modern economists reject this view and stress the need for strategies
designed to meet the needs of the poor directly. Hence, economic development
has come to be redefined in terms of the reduction or elimination of poverty,
inequality, and unemployment within the context of a growing economy.
“Redistribution from growth” has become an accepted paradigm. Prof. Dudley
Seers poses the basic question about the meaning of development very clearly
when he states:
The questions to ask about a country’s development are therefore: what
has been happening to poverty? What has been happening to
unemployment? What has been happening to inequality? If all 3 of these
have declined from high levels then beyond doubt this has been a period of
development for the country. If one or two of these central problems have
been growing worse, especially if all three have, it would be strange to
call the result “development” even if per capita income doubled.
Economic development, in its essence, must represent the whole gamut of change
by which an entire social system, tuned to the diverse basic needs and desires of
individuals and social systems within that system, move away from a condition
of life widely perceived as unsatisfactory towards a situation of life regarded as
materially and spiritually “better”.
11
Growth and If economic growth does not guarantee improvement in living standards, then
Development GDP per capita may not be a meaningful measure of economic development. In
addition to problems associated with how income is spent and distributed, any
definition of eco- nomic development must include more than income levels.
Income, after all, is only a means to an end, not an end itself. If economic growth
and economic development are not the same thing, how should we define
economic development? Amartya Sen, economist, philosopher, and Nobel
laureate, argues that the goal of development is to expand the capabilities of
people to live the lives they choose to lead. Income is one factor in determining
such capabilities and outcomes, but it is not the only one. To be capable of
leading a life of one’s own choice requires what Sen calls “elementary
functionings,” such as escaping high morbidity and mortality, being adequately
nourished, and having at least a basic education. Also required are more complex
functionings, such as achieving self-respect and being able to take part in the life
of the community. Income is but one of the many factors that enhance such
individual capabilities.
In view of the above considerations economic development is now being defined
“as the process of increasing the degree of utilisation and improving the
productivity of the available resources of a country which leads to an increase in
the economic welfare of the community by stimulating the growth of national
income”.
It follows from this definition that the progress of development has to be assessed
by reference to two separate indicators, namely, (i) the indices of ‘production’ or
GDP, and (ii) the indices of ‘economic welfare’ of the community. The former
covers what may be called the ‘growth’ aspects of development.
So defined, the concept of economic development emphasises the achievement of
the following three objectives:
To increase the availability and widen the distribution of basic life sustaining
goods such as food, shelter and protection. This, however, would be possible
with a fast increase in real per capita income.
To raise standards of living including, in addition to higher incomes, the
provisions of more goods, better education and greater attention to cultural
and humanistic values, all of which will serve not only to enhance material
well-being but also to generate individual and national self-esteem.
To expand the range of economic and social choice to individuals and
nations by freeing them from servitude and dependence not only in relation
to other people and nation-states, but also to the forces of ignorance and
human misery. Economic development is to be assessed ultimately by the
enhancement of the ‘positive freedom’.
12
In view of the above three objectives, the quality of life is regarded as an Concept Indicators and
Measurement
important index of development. It is contended that such quality is not
adequately reflected in the index of per capita income growth. Several factors are
involved in the measurement of such ‘quality’; some of these factors are non-
monetary, while others can be measured in money terms. There is a need to set
up a synthetic index of these different factors to measure economic development
and quality of life.
. We may note the following as important changes:
Constituents of GDP Change: More generally, in terms of percentage
shares, saving rates increase as income grows, government revenues (and
expenditure) increase, food consumption drops and non-food consumption
increases, out of services – and, of course, also industry – increases, while
agriculture falls.
Employment Changes: Employment changes reflect the shift in output and
changes in productivity. Labour in the primary sector of the economy does
not fall as rapidly as its share in output, the reverse is true for employment in
industry where increase in labour productivity is more easily secured.
Shift in the Composition of Exports: As development proceeds, exports
will account for a larger proportion of income and there will have been a
marked shift in the composition of exports, so that the value of export of
manufactures rises relative to that of primary products. Imports will also
have risen and earnings and payments will be roughly balanced.
Rate of Increase in Population: As incomes increase, the rate of increase in
population may be expected to fall, as the birth rate declines along with a fall
in the death rate. The population would still be increasing, but gradually the
rate of growth will tend to peter out.
Distribution of income: Income would at first become more unequally
distributed and then this trend would be reversed. You will read more about this
and on what is called the Kuznets ‘inverted U curve’ in Block 3 in the unit on
inequality
Economic development is a broad term that does not have a single, unique
definition.
Life sustaining goods and services: To increase the availability and
widen the distribution of basic life-sustaining goods such as food, shelter,
health and protection.
Higher incomes: To raise levels of living, including, in addition to higher
incomes, the provision of more jobs, better education, and greater
attention to cultural and human values, all of which will serve not only to
enhance material well-being but also to generate greater individual and
national self-esteem
13
Growth and Freedom to make economic and social choices: To expand the range of
Development
choices available to individuals and nations by freeing them from
servitude and dependence not only in relation to other people and nation-
states but also to the forces of ignorance and human misery.
Dudley Sears has defined development as “the reduction and elimination of
poverty, inequality and unemployment within a growing economy”.
The Nobel Economist Amartya Sen in his 1998 Nobel address, identified four
broad factors, beyond mere poverty, that affect how well income can be
converted into “the capability to live a minimally acceptable life”:
• Personal heterogeneities: including age, proneness to illness, and extent of
disabilities.
• Environmental diversities: shelter, clothing, and fuel, for example, required
by climatic conditions.
• Variations in social climate: such as the impact of crime, civil unrest, and
violence.
• Differences in relative deprivation: for example, the extent to which being
impoverished reduces one’s capability to take part in the life of the greater
community.
According to Sen, economic development requires alleviating the sources of
“capability deprivation” that prevent people from having the freedom to live
the lives they desire.
In his book Development as Freedom, Sen sees development as being concerned
with improving the freedoms and capabilities of the disadvantaged, thereby
enhancing the overall quality of life. Sen pursues the idea that development
provides an opportunity to people to free themselves from the suffering caused
by
• Early mortality
• Persecution
• Starvation
• Illiteracy
In block 3 of this course, and in course BECC 114, you will be introduced to
the Human Development Index
Check Your Progress 1
1) What is the definition of Economic Growth?
2) Distinguish between economic growth and economic development.
3) What type of structural changes take place in an economy as it develops?
15
Growth and 1.4 CHARACTERISTICS OF DEVELOPING NATIONS
Development
We have seen what development means. We have also seen how it is different
from economic growth. Now, there are certain nations that are known as
developed nations, and certain nations that are called developing. What is the
difference between developed and developing nations. To say that developed
nations have a higher level of development begs the question, what does that
mean? What do we understand by a “higher level of development? Although
these questions shall be answered in greater detail in the next unit, in this unit we
look at certain characteristics that are evident in most of the developing nations.
In the next unit, we shall see there are finer sub-classifications among the
developing nations. For now, let us discuss some of the common characteristics
that most developing nations display.
1.4.1 Low Per Capita Income
Most of the developing nations have a lower per capita income than developed
nations. Some developing nations may have a high gross domestic product level
but the income per head tends to be low. one of the most commonly acceptable
criteria of underdevelopment is the low per capita real income of
underdeveloped countries as compared with the developed countries. Added to
this is low level of physical capital and low capital to worker ratio. Developing
nations also tend to low productivity and sometimes lower levels of technology.
Moreover, developing nations show high levels of poverty, low indices of human
development, very high inequality of income as well as assets, and
unemployment — structural, cyclical and disguised.
1.4.2 Low Manufacturing Base
One of the characteristics that we see about developing nations is that much of
the gross domestic product is accounted for by agriculture and sometimes,
services too, but the manufacturing sector is not so developed. Industries are not
widespread and diversified. Much of production and employment is in the
unorganized sector. Much of it stems from low capital and low investment.
Savings are often low too because of low income. Low savings lead to low
investment, which further leads to lower income. This has sometimes been called
the vicious cycle of poverty, if the income and capital accumulation range was
really low. High rates of industrial growth has been a characteristic feature of
those countries that have moved to a higher development level or even moved
from being a developing towards becoming a developed nation.
1.4.3 Other Features
Several developing nations have displayed some other features that are common
to many of these countries. Often population rates of growth and fertility levels in
these countries are high. This creates pressure on the resources and output of the
country. Secondly level of urbanization is low, and a large proportion of the
people resides in rural areas. In production, there is often an economic dualistic
structure with a low-wage low productivity rural and agricultural sector and a
smaller more productive higher-wage manufacturing sector, often located in
urban and semi-urban areas. Often there is migration from low-wage rural areas
to urban areas because of rural-urban wage gap. Often those migrants who cannot
be absorbed in the manufacturing areas end up in the urban informal sector.
16
Other features in developing countries are that exports are in many cases low, Concept Indicators and
and most of the existing exports are of primary products. Moreover some Measurement
developing nations have for a long time depended on foreign aid.. There have
also been cases of some nations getting caught in international debt trap.
Some other characteristics are that developing nations have non-diversified
financial sectors with still a large presence of informal money and capital
markets. There is financial repression and finance and credit do not flow to
requisite areas and to those who require. There are financial constraints on
growth.
Developing nations also often show low levels of attainment as far as social
sector is concerned. Education, even literacy and primary level enrollment, as
well as health levels are low, in some case basic and minimum needs are not met.
Clean drinking water and sanitation is not universal, infrastructure like good
roads electricity, good systems of telecommunication too are not widespread.
Often developing nations have governments providing poor governance, other
institutions are not well developed, and levels of social capital is low too. You
will read about all these in greater detail in later units of this course and in the
course Development Economic –II (BECC 114).
17
Growth and 1) Changes in the Size of GDP and Economic Welfare
Development
i) If the GDP increases but the population of the country increases in a
greater proportion, the total economic welfare will decline. As a result of
increased population, the per capita income will decline, which means
lesser purchasing power than before, lower standard of living, and
consequently, lower economic welfare.
ii) While analysing the relationship between the size of GDP and economic
welfare, the behaviour of the price movements must be thoroughly
studied. GDP calculated at current prices is always deceptive and
increase in its size will not promote economic welfare. Estimates of real
GDP (i.e., GDP calculated at fixed base prices) can provide a better
measure.
iii) GDP consists of those goods and services which are transacted in the
market and fetch money value. We know that a part of the total produce
is kept by the producers for self-consumption. Now, suppose that this
retained produce (which is not part of GDP) is offered for sale in the
market, it will definitely fetch money value and as a result GDP will also
increase. In fact, the total output is same, but since it has now come to
the monetary sector, it becomes a part of the GDP and hence increases its
value. Such an increase in GDP will not increase the economic welfare.
iv) In case increase in the size of GDP is the result of prolonged working
hours, increased employment of children in production, unhealthy and
polluted atmosphere inside the factory premises, such an increase in
GDP will not promote economic welfare.
2) Changes in the Composition of GDP and Economic Welfare Composition
of GDP refers to the kinds of goods and services produced in an economy.
Changes in the composition of GDP may sometimes increase economic
welfare and may at other times decrease it. Let us consider the following
cases:
i) If the total production has increased on account of more production of
capital goods, it will not increase economic welfare. No doubt the
money value of the total output has increased, but the volume of
consumer goods, on which depends the real economic welfare, has not
increased. It is only when the proportion of consumer goods increases in
the total output the GDP can promote economic welfare.
ii) If the GDP has increased on account of larger production of war-goods,
the resultant increase will not increase economic welfare. This may no
doubt head to increased fighting capacity of the country but it will do no
good to economic welfare.
18
3) Changes in the Distribution of GDP and Economic Welfare Concept Indicators and
Measurement
If the GDP increases and yet if it is not fairly distributed or it is concentrated
in a fewer hands, it will not promote economic welfare. It is so because as the
rich people get richer the additional money income does not provide them
the same marginal utility as the preceding unit of money income. In other
words, the law of diminishing marginal utility also applies to the additional
money income so that the economic welfare instead of increasing will
diminish.
When the distribution of GDP changes in favour of the poor, they start
getting more commodities and services than before, as a result the economic
welfare increases. Any transfer of income from the rich to the poor,
generally, promotes economic welfare. In fact, there is a unique relationship
between one’s economic welfare and that part of his income which he spends
on consumption and consequently smaller is his economic welfare compared
to this total income. The poor people who spend a major proportion of their
total income on consumption, as a matter of fact, will get more utility from
the transferred income as compared to the rich people.
Transfer of income from the rich to the poor, however, does not increase
economic welfare always, especially if additional income in the hands of the
poor gets frittered away on such things as simply reduce his welfare.
19
Growth and This common denominator cannot take account of purchasing power differences
Development
in different countries.
In some units in other chapters you will be acquainted with some other indicators
of welfare. In this unit we present a discussion on the Millenium Development
Goals and Sustainable Development Goals , in the following section.
20
1.6.2 The Sustainable Development Goals Concept Indicators and
Measurement
The world as a whole, and India too, made considerable progress in meeting
te targets. And yet some gaps remained.
The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, adopted by all United Nations
Member States in 2015, provides a shared roadmap for peace and prosperity for
people and the planet, now and into the future. At its core are the 17 Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs), which are an urgent call for action by all countries -
developed and developing - in a global partnership. The SDGs include 17 goals
and 169 targets. The 17 goals are to be achieved by 2030. The 17 goals are:
1. End poverty in all its forms;
2. End hunger , improve nutrition and achieve food security;
3. Ensure healthy lives and well-being;
4. Ensure equitable and quality education for all and promote lifelong learning;
5. Achieve gender equality and empower women and girls;
6. Ensure availability and sustainable management of clean water and
sanitation for all ;
7. Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and clean energy for all;
8. Promote sustained , inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and
productive employment and decent work for all;
9. Build resilient infrastructure, promote sustainable Industry, and promote
innovation,;
10. Reduce inequality within and among countries;
11. Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable;
12. Ensure responsible consumption and production patterns;
13. Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts;
14. Conserve and sustainably use seas, oceans and marine resources;
15. Promote , protect and restore sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems,
sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land
degradation and halt biodiversity loss.
16. Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development,
provide access to justice for all, and build effective, accountable, and
inclusive institutions at all levels; and
17. Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalise global partnership for
sustainable development.
In 2000, the MDGs set the agenda for development activities and consisted of
eight targets aimed at combatting poverty. While the MDGs set the target and
there we quite a few achievements, they were faced with many criticisms. These
criticisms mainly included around their legitimacy and how the goals and targets
were chosen and set, their narrowness and under emphasis of certain aspects of
development, including human rights, gender and the environment, and how the
progress was reported and measured.
21
When the MDGs period was reaching an end, it was agreed by all countries to
reform and propose a more widespread, inclusive and reflective set of
development goals. The SDGs emerged as an attempt to represent the challenges
that countries face in the next 15 years and beyond, and is an attempt to address
the root cause of many of them.
The 17 SDGs were identified through widespread consultation over three years
on contrast to the MDGs. This process took into account the views of all parties,
including national governments, civil society, multilateral development
institutions and individuals.
How are the SDGs different from MDGs?
While the MDGs mainly applied to developing countries, the SDGs are
universally applicable. That is they apply to all countries, no matter their current
development status.
Meeting SDGs require that they are implemented in an integrated manner and is
based on the recognition that there is no trade-off between economic, social and
environmental development. Indeed each of these aspects is mutually reinforcing
and one cannot be achieved without the other, or failure in one area could lead to
failure in others. This is in contrast to the MDGs which primarily focussed on the
social aspects of development.
By their nature, the SDGs are a set of broad goals and targets, this is so each
country can decide on the most realistic and practical way to implement policies,
programmes or projects to move towards meeting the SDGs. They build off the
MDGs, but offer more ambitious goals.
Check Your Progress 2
1. Evaluate the usefulness of (i) GDP, and (ii) per capita GDP as measures
of economic development and of welfare.
2. Discuss some characteristics of developing nations.
3. What are the Millennium Development goals? How many goals are there
in the Sustainable Development goals? List any seven
22
1.7 LET US SUM UP
This unit dealt with the basic of economics of development as well as the
concepts of economic growth and development. It began with explaining what
growth means: enlargement, expansion. Economic growth is typically seen as
growth in gross domestic product. The unit explained the measurement of growth
and also discussed the relative merits of considering growth in GDP as growth
versus growth per-capita GDP. The unit explained how growth is measured, and
how to compare income levels across countries and over time .
The unit went on to discuss in detail the concept of economic development, and
how it differs from economic growth. The unit explained that economic
development is a much broader concept than economic growth, although
economic growth is the foundation of economic development. However, though
economic growth is a fundamental concept of economic development, the latter
is characterized also by an overall structural transformation of economy.
Examples of such structural change includes decline of the share of agriculture in
GDP and the rise of that of the service sector; increasing urbanization, change in
the composition of the work-force, and so on.
Subsequently, the unit discussed in detail the characteristics and features of a
developing economy. We saw low per-capita income, a large agriculture, low
urbanization were some of the characteristics.
After this the unit discussed elaborately the concept and meaning of economic
development in all its aspects and dimensions. Finally the unit presented a
discussion the Millennium Development Goals and Sustainable Development
Goals.
23
UNIT 2 INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS
Structure
2.0 Objectives
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Development Gap
2.3 The Divide between Developed and Developing Nations
2.4 Historical Patterns of Development
2.5 Some Case Studies
2.6 Let Us Sum Up
2.7 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises
2.0 OBJECTIVES
After going through this unit, you will be able to:
• Explain the nature of development gap between developed and developing
nations;
• Discuss the reasons for the emergence of the difference in the levels of
development between the developed and developing nations;
• Describe the historical patterns of development in different parts of the world;
and
• Present some case studies regarding different development experiences of
countries.
2.1 INTRODUCTION
When we study economic development we find some crucial questions confront
us regarding different countries and regions. Why are living conditions so
drastically different for people in different countries and different regions of the
world?, We find some countries poor and others rich. Why is it so? Why are
there such disparities in income and wealth? t Also there are huge difference in
the levels of health, nutrition, education, liberty, choice, women’s rights? Why
do workers in some countries have secure jobs in the formal sector, with regular
pay, while in other countries such jobs are extremely there is scarcity of such
jobs, and most workers are in informal sector with fluctuating and insecure
wages? Why are populations growing at a fast pace in certain countries, while on
the verge of being stagnant or even reducing in others? Why are public services
so inefficient, insufficient, and corrupt in some countries and so effective in
others? Why have some formerly poor countries made so much progress, and
other s so comparatively little?
This unit takes up a discussion of issues regarding the difference, the gap
between the standard of living of the developing and developed nations.
It explores the reasons for such gaps. We also have to see whether there are
historical reasons for such gaps emerging.
In the next section we see the meaning of the development gap, conceptually and International
theoretically. Subsequently we see various ways the developing nations are Comparisons
classified. After looking at World Bank’s and United Nations’ classifications, the
following unit takes a look at the basic historical patterns of development in
order to see when and how in history the gap, the divergence between developed
and developing nations emerged. Finally the unit provides some case studies in
order to illustrate the development experiences of certain countries, how certain
countries developed to a great extent over time, and how some others fell back
and sometimes had a reversal of fortune.
25
Growth and The per capita income of country A in 2022 becomes $1020 (because 2 % of $
Development 1000 is $ 20 and so its per capita income becomes $1000 + $20 = $1020). On the
other hand, the per capita income of country B in 2020 becomes $ 102 (because
2 % of $ 100 is $ 2 and so its per capita income becomes $ 100 + $2 = $102).
Let us see what happens to the gap in the per capita income of the 2 countries. In
2022 the gap is $1020 - $102 = $918. So we find that compared to 2021 the gap
has actually increased when both countries grew at the same rate. ( the gap
increased from $900 to $918). In fact, the poor country has to grow at 20 % over
2021-2022 for its per-capita income to rise to $120, so as to keep the gap in per
capita income between the rich and poor countries at $900 — the same as before
($1020 – $ 120 = $ 900. So we see that in order to merely prevent the gap in
per-capita income from increasing, the poor country in this example has to grow
10 times as fast as the developed country. As another example, Take for
illustration the case of the average person in the poor country living on the
equivalent of $200 per annum compared with the average person in the rich
country living on approximately $10 000. Suppose the income of the average
person in the poor country rises by 20 per cent and the income of the average
person in the rich country rises by 10 per cent. The average person in the poor
country is now relatively better off, but is he not comparatively worse off? The
increased command over goods and services of the average person in the rich
country (i.e. 10 per cent of $10 000) far exceeds that of the the average person in
the poor country (i.e. 20 per cent of $200)
where P is the principal sum. In our context, P can be taken as the initial per
capita income , S the final one, r the rate of growth and t the time period (number
of years )over which growth is considered
26
countries on a continuum based on their degree of development. Therefore, we International
speak of the distinctions between developed and underdeveloped countries, more Comparisons
and less developed ones, or — to recognize continuing change — developed
countries and developing countries. The United Nations employs a
classification scheme that refers to the poorest nations as the least-developed
countries. Some Asian, eastern European, and Latin American economies,
whose industrial output is growing rapidly, are sometimes referred to as
emerging economies. Richer countries are frequently called industrialized
countries, because of the close association between industrialization and
development. The highest-income countries are sometimes called post-industrial
countries or service-based economies because services (finance, research and
development, medical services, etc.), not manufacturing, account for the largest
and most rapidly growing share of their economies.
The United Nations uses certain rules for distinguishing between developed and
developing countries. However, the World Bank has stopped using these terms in
favor of others, such as "low-income" or "lower-middle-income" economies,
based on gross national income (GNI) per person. The International Monetary
Fund (IMF) definition is based on per-person income, export diversification, and
the degree of union with the global financial system. (IMF) definition is based on
per-person income, export diversification, and the degree of union with the global
financial system. The IMF published a research report on the topic of
development classification in 2011. It outlined its methods for classifying a
country's level of development.
Countries that are deemed more developed are referred to as developed countries,
while those that are less developed are known as less economically developed
countries (LEDCs)
The World Bank has historically classified every economy as low, middle, or
high income. It now further specifies countries as having low-, lower-middle-,
upper-middle-, or high-income economies. The World Bank uses GNI per capita,
in current U.S. dollars converted by the Atlas method of a three-year moving
average of exchange rates, as the basis for this classification. It views GNI as a
broad measure and the single best indicator of economic capacity and progress.
The World Bank used to refer to low-income and middle-income economies as
developing economies; in 2016, it chose to drop the term from its vocabulary,
citing a lack of specificity. Instead, the World Bank now refers to countries by
their region, income, and lending status.
The World Bank assigns the world’s economies to four income groups—low,
lower-middle, upper-middle, and high-income countries. The classifications are
updated each year on July 1 and are based on GNI( Gross national Income) per
capita in current US dollars (using the exchange rates) of the previous year.
According to the World Bank, sustainable growth and development in MICs have
positive spillovers to the rest of the world. Examples are poverty reduction,
international financial stability, and global cross-border issues, including climate
change, sustainable energy development, food and water security, and
international trade.
27
Growth and MICs have a combined population of five billion, or over 70% of the world's
Development
seven billion people, hosting 73% of the world's economically disadvantaged.
Representing about one-third of global GDP, MICs are a major engine of global
economic growth.
The classifications change for two reasons:
1) In each country, factors such as economic growth, inflation, exchange rates,
and population growth influence GNI per capita. Revisions to national
accounts methods and data can also have an influence in specific cases. To
keep the income classification thresholds fixed in real terms, they are adjusted
annually for inflation. The Special Drawing Rights (SDR) deflator is used,
which is a weighted average of the GDP deflators of China, Japan, the United
Kingdom, the United States, and the Euro Area.
2) To keep the income classification thresholds fixed in real terms, they are
adjusted annually for inflation. The Special Drawing Rights (SDR) deflator is
used, which is a weighted average of the GDP deflators of China, Japan, the
United Kingdom, the United States, and the Euro Area.
3) To keep the income classification thresholds fixed in real terms, they are
adjusted annually for inflation. The Special Drawing Rights (SDR) deflator is
used, which is a weighted average of the GDP deflators of China, Japan, the
United Kingdom, the United States, and the Euro Area.
Group July 1, 2021 (new)
Low income
28
of the world considered for classification, 35 countries were low-income International
countries, 57 countries were lower-middle-income countries, 54 countries were Comparisons
in the upper-middle-income category, and 70 countries were high-income
countries. Thus the largest number of countries were in the high-income
category! However, if we consider population, the population of the low-income
countries was 12 % of world population; the population of the lower-middle-
income countries was 36 % of world population; so was the population of the
upper-middle-income countries; while the population of high-income countries
was 16 % of the world population. Thus, while most of the countries in the world
were high-income, most of the population lived in middle-income countries.
In unit 1, we brought out the difference between economic growth and economic
development. We saw development is much more than economic growth.
Development involves a structural transformation of the economy, and there are
many more indicators of development. Economic growth is a necessary condition
for development but it is certainly not a sufficient one. Here, in this unit, in the
above discussion about the difference between developed and developing nation
you may be getting the idea that a lot of emphasis is being laid on income of
nations (for instance, the World Bank classification). So what happens if the
Gross National Income (same as the Gross National Product, or GDP, as you
have read in macroeconomics courses) of a nation were to change dramatically?
Consider the case of Equatorial Guinea, a small nation on the West coast of
Africa. It has a population of less than a million people. The discovery and
development of oil deposits and reserves off its coast led to a dramatic rise in its
per-capita GDP. In 1990 its per-capita income was $330. By 2009 it had shot up
to $ 12, 420. In the decade 2000-2009 it was the fastest growing economy in the
world, reaching average growth rates of 25 per cent, exceeding growth rates of
China. With this kind of growth rates, in about a decade, Equatorial Guinea
moved from being a low-income country to a high-income one.
Notice we are talking of growth rates. Did it mean that Equatorial Guinea
became a developed nation from a developing one. The answer is no, because in
terms of other indicators this country did not progress that dramatically. It
reached the same income level as that of Hungary, but this is where the similarity
between the two nations ends. Life expectancy in Equatorial Guinea is about 50
years, while in Hungary it is 74 years. About 90% of school-aged Hungarian
children are enrolled in primary school; for Equatorial Guinea it is about 50
percent. Despite Equatorial Guinea’s sudden high level of per capita income
there has been little transformation in the low levels of education and poor health
care of most Equatorial Guineans. Nor has there been much change in their
economic activity. Rapid economic growth has not brought economic
development to most of the population of Equatorial Guinea. But again, this case
is the exception rather than the rule. In most cases, increases in per capita
incomes and economic development have moved together. Thus we see that
although levels of per-capita incomes are very important for determining whether
a country is developed or developing, we should consider many other features,
29
Growth and characteristics and indicators. What proportion of the population is rural? How
Development big is the share of agriculture in GDP? What is the composition of international
trade, particularly exports? How is the country doing in terms of social indicators
like health indicators , education, poverty, unemployment, inequality. How are
manufacturing and services placed. In all these aspects there this a big difference
and gap on the whole between developed and developing nations.
Modern economic growth, the term used by Nobel laureate Simon Kuznets,
refers to the current economic epoch as contrasted with, say, the epoch of
merchant capitalism or the epoch of feudalism. The epoch of modern economic
growth still is evolving, so all its features are not yet clear, but the key element
has been the application of science to problems of economic production, which in
turn has led to industrialization, urbanization, and even explosive growth in
population. Finally, it should always be kept in mind that, although economic
development and modern economic growth involve much more than a rise in per
capita income or product, no sustained development can occur without economic
growth.
Check Your Progress 1
1. What do you mean by development gap?
2. Describe the World Bank classification of various countries of the world
in terms of economic levels. In what way does it differ from the classification
of the United Nations?
30
in per capita income between 1 B.c.E. and 1000 was effectively zero. The next International
820 years (from 1000 to 1820) were barely any better, with world income per Comparisons
capita growing, on average, by just 0.05 percent per year. (Note: This is not a
growth rate of 5 percent; it is a growth rate of 0.05 percent.) During those 820
years, world GDP grew by only slightly more than the growth in world
population. After eight centuries, world per capita income had increased by only
50 percent. To place this in some perspective, China today is one of the world’s
fastest-growing economies. With more than 1 billion people (about four times the
entire world’s population in 1000), economic growth in China aver- aged about
9.5 percent over the past decade, raising Chinese per capita incomes by 50
percent, not in 820 years but in just under 5 years!
Maddison’s estimates indicate considerable uniformity in per capita incomes
throughout the first millennium. The little bit of economic growth that did take
place over the next 800 years was centered in western Europe and in what
Maddison calls the western “offshoots” (Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and
the United States). By 1820, these regions already had a decided advantage over
the rest of the world. For example, whereas China and India may have been
slightly ahead of the western European countries in 1000, average per capita
incomes in western Europe and in their offshoots were already double those of
China and India by 1820.
Maddison’s research suggests that rapid economic growth as we know it really
began around 1820. He estimates that over the subsequent 190 years, the aver-
age growth in world income increased to 1.3 percent per year. Note that the
difference between annual growth of 0.05 percent and 1.3 percent is huge. With
the world economy growing at 0.05 percent per year, it would take more than
1,400 years for aver- age income to double. With annual growth of 1.3 percent,
average income doubles in just 55 years. The world had changed from no growth
at all during the first millennium, to slow growth for most of the second
millennium, to a situation in which, in the past two centuries, average real
income began to double in less than every three generations. Several features of
these data are notable. First, economic growth rates clearly accelerated around
the world since the early 1800s and especially after 1880. Second, and perhaps
most striking, the richest countries recorded the fastest growth rates and the
poorest countries recorded the slowest growth rates, at least until 1950. Per capita
income in the Western offshoots grew by about 1.6 percent per year between
1820 and 1950, while in Asia it grew by only 0.16 percent. As a result, the ratio
of the average incomes in the richest regions to those in the poorest regions grew
from about 2:1 in 1820 to about 13:1 in 1950.
Between 1950 and 2008, the patterns of economic growth changed, at least in
several regions. The gap between the Western offshoots and western Europe,
which had been widening through 1950, narrowed significantly. The poorest
region in 1950 (Asia) recorded the fastest subsequent growth rate (3.6 percent),
thereby beginning to close the income gap with the richer regions of the world.
By contrast, Latin America’s growth stagnated during the 1980s and 1990s, and
eastern Europe’s collapsed after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. Both regions
resumed economic growth during the 2000s.
31
Growth and In Africa, as elsewhere, average growth rates accelerated after 1820 and did so
Development again after 1950, in the period associated with the end of the colonial era. But as
in Latin America, economic growth in Africa faded after 1980, continued to
stagnate in the 1990s, and rebounded only recently. As a result, the income gap
between the world’s richest regions (the Western offshoots) and the poorest in
2000 (Africa) reached 19:1. According to Maddison’s work, this is the largest
gap in income between rich and poor regions the world has ever known. Because
of resurgence in economic growth in Africa during the 2000s, this gap has
narrowed but still remains huge by historical standards.
Maddison’s broad sweep of world economic history indicates how
differential rates of economic growth, especially over the past two
centuries, have produced the divergence in income levels that characterizes
the world’s economy today.
32
Malaysia, which previously had been known mainly for the export of rubber, tin, International
and palm oil, became one of the world’s largest exporters of electronic Comparisons
components and other labor-intensive manufactured goods. Partly because of
these exports, Malaysia emerged as one of the fastest growing economies in the
world and a leading development success story. The income of the average
Malay more than quadrupled in real terms between 1970 and 2010, infant
mortality fell from 41 to 6 infants per thousand, and life expectancy rose from 61
to 75 years. Adult literacy jumped from 58 to 92 percent and the ratio of girls to
boys enrolled in school increased from 83 to 103 percent.
Ethiopia Per capita incomes in 2004 were at about the same levels as in 1981. In
the intervening years, incomes at times increased and at other times declined, but
overall, economic stagnation characterized the nation. Since 2004, how- ever,
economic growth has been faster and more consistent, averaging 6.6 percent per
year. This is much faster than at any time over the past three decades. Despite the
global recession of 2008–09, Ethiopia’s economy continues to grow rapidly,
although it is hard to know if this will be sustained.
Looking at other indicators of living standards, infant mortality rates fell from an
estimated 136 per thousand in 1970 to 67 per thousand in 2009, reflecting the
potential for health outcomes to improve even when income does not. Life
expectancy, at 56 years, is 13 years more than in 1970 but still well below the
levels in Malaysia and other more affluent economies. Adult literacy is less than
one out of three, but this will improve in the future. Four out of every five of
Ethiopia’s children of school age are now enrolled in primary school — double
the level of a decade ago. The economy is changing too, albeit slowly. In 1970,
61% of national output was derived from agriculture; today this figure is 51%.
33
Growth and The success is largely due to the country’s relentless focus on products, such as
Development garments, in which it possesses a comparative advantage. Moreover, the share of
Bangladeshi women in the labour force has consistently grown. Also, Bangladesh
has maintained a public debt-to-GDP ratio of between 30% to 40 %.
Check Your Progress 2
1) Describe the performance of the world economy between the 11th and 19th
century as elucidated by Angus Maddison. Since when did the world economy
grow?
2) Briefly bring out the contours of development of any particular developing
country of your choice, giving reasons for its success.
34
Introduction to Growth
Models
BLOCK 2 INTRODUCTION
The second block of the course is titled Growth Models: Theory and Evidence.
In the first block, you had studied about the basic idea of what is meant by
economic growth and economic development and the relationship among them.
Also you were presented with some international comparisons among nations
regarding the level of development.
The present block has five units. Unit 3 is titled Introduction to Growth
Models, and the next one, unit 4 is titled Harrod-Domar Model. Unit 5 is titled
The Solow Model. Unit 6 is titled Endogenous Growth Model, and finally, unit
7 is titled Determinants of Growth.
The subsequent three units in this Block take up for discussions the various
theories one by one. Unit 4 discusses the fixed-coefficient production function
using Harrod-Domar model. Unit 5 discusses one of the central models of
economic growth in the literature on growth theory, namely, the Solow growth
model. Unit 6 discusses the endogenous growth models, that is models where
growth is determined within the system, as are the factors causing growth.
37
Growth Models:
Theory & Evidence
UNIT 3 INTRODUCTION TO GROWTH MODELS
Structure
3.0 Objectives
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Classical growth theory
3.3 Marxian Theory of growth
3.4 Stages of Growth theories: Rostow and Kuznets
3.4.1 Rostow’s Theory
3.4.2 Kuznet’s Theory
3.5 Structural Change Models
3.5.1 Lewis Model and Patterns of development analysis
3.5.2 The International Dependence Model and the Dualistic Development Thesis
3.6 The Neoclassical Counterrevolution and Traditional Neoclassical Growth
Theory
3.7 The Theory of Endogenous Growth
3.8 Unified Growth theory
3.9 Let Us Sum Up
3.0 OBJECTIVES
After going through the unit you will be able to:
● Explain the concept of economic growth ,development and growth models;
● Describe the background and evolution of growth models;
● Identify the sources of growth in various models of growth; and
● Discuss the structure of the various growth models
3.1 INTRODUCTION
Economic growth is the study of the causes and consequences of sustained
growth in real GDP per person. One can define economic growth as the increase
in the inflation-adjusted value of the goods and services produced by an economy
over time. Economists refer to an increase in economic growth caused by more
efficient use of inputs that is labour, capital, land etc. as intensive growth. GDP
growth caused only by increases in the amount of inputs available for use
(increased population, or new machinery) counts as extensive growth. The "rate
of economic growth" refers to the geometric annual rate of growth in GDP over a
period of time. This growth rate represents the trend in the average level of GDP
over the period, and ignores any fluctuations in the GDP around this trend.
Economic Development is a much wider concept in terms of scope vis-a-vis
growth and is defined as a combination of social, economic and institutional
processes that secure the means for obtaining a better life. It should be perceived
as a multidimensional process involving the reorganisation and reorientation of
economic and social systems.
38
While economists in the 20th century viewed development primarily in terms of Introduction to Growth
economic growth, sociologists instead emphasized broader processes of change Models
and modernization. Development and urban studies scholar Karl Seidman
summarizes economic development as "a process of creating and utilizing
physical, human, financial, and social assets to generate improved and broadly
shared economic well-being and quality of life for a community or region".
Daphne Greenwood and Richard Holt distinguish economic development from
economic growth on the basis that economic development is a "broadly based
and sustainable increase in the overall standard of living for individuals within a
community", and measures of growth such as per capita income do not
necessarily correlate with improvements in quality of life. Economic
development is a wider concept and has qualitative dimensions. Economic
development implies economic growth plus progressive changes in certain
important variables which determine well-being of the people, for example,
health and education.
Economic development is the primary objective of the majority of nations across
the world. The universal features of economic development-health, life
expectancy, literacy and so on-follow in some natural way the growth of per-
capita GNP. If we see it as purely economic, we can say it is synonymous to
Economic growth. But in addition to rising income it implies fundamental
changes in the structure of the economy as well. Economic growth is one of the
most important notions in the global economy. Despite the criticism that the level
and rate of growth does not always reflect the real level of a population’s living
standards, it remains the primary measure of prosperity. However, as a measure
describing the dynamics of economic processes in the country it has some
drawbacks. First, it does not record the volume of production obtained from the
informal market, known as the "black market", which means that not all
economic transactions are included in the total volume of generated output. In
addition, economic growth does not take into account changes in the amount of
time spent on work, which obviously affects the welfare of society. Also the
measure of economic growth does not include the negative processes associated
with economic activities, such as environmental pollution, its progressive
degradation, or noise pollution. However, despite all these drawbacks economic
growth remains the primary measure of the socio-economic conditions of the
citizens of a country. A model of economic growth is based on economic theory
to establish basic fundamental assumptions that allow proposing an interaction
between the factors of production in order to explain the determinants of
economic growth. The principal theories of economic growth include:
Mercantilism-At the beginning of the Industrial Revolution , wealth of a nation
was determined by the accumulation of gold and running trade surplus. It was not
a growth theory but argued that a country would be better off by accumulating
gold and by increasing exports.
Classical Theory- Adam Smith with whom the classical school started placed
emphasis on the several factors which enable increased economic growth:
39
Growth Models:
a) Role of markets in determining demand and supply.
Theory & Evidence
b) Productivity of labour that is the state of the skill, dexterity and judgement
with which labour is applied in any nation.
c) Role of Trade in enabling greater specialisation.
d) Role of increasing returns to scale.
While David Ricardo developed the classical model that assumed technological
change as constant and increasing inputs that could lead to diminishing returns,
Thomas Malthus could notthe capacity of technological improvements to
increase food yields .The theory states that food production will not be able to
keep up with growth in the human population, resulting in disease, famine, war,
and calamity .
Neo-Classical Theory- Neoclassical growth theory is an economic theory that
outlines how a steady economic growth rate results from a combination of three
driving forces—labor, capital, and technology.
Endogenous growth theories- The Endogenous Growth Theory states that
economic growth is generated internally in the economy, i.e., through
endogenous forces, and not through exogenous ones. The theory contrasts with
the neoclassical growth model, which claims that external factors such as
technological progress, etc. are the main sources of economic growth.
Keynesian Demand side Theory: Keynes criticised the Classical school of
thought and argued that Aggregate Demand could play a role in influencing
economic growth in the Short and medium, -term. Though most growth theories
ignore the role of Aggregate Demand, some economists argue recessions can
cause hysteresis effects and lower long-term growth.
Limits to growth-An environmental perspective leads some to argue that in the
very long-term economic growth will be constrained by resource degradation and
global warming.
41
Growth Models: Smith's model of growth remained the predominant model of Classical Growth.
Theory & Evidence David Ricardo (1817) modified it by including diminishing returns to land.
Output growth requires growth of factor inputs, but, unlike labor, land is
"variable in quality and fixed in supply". This means that as growth proceeds,
more land must be taken into cultivation, but land cannot be "created". This has
two effects for growth: firstly, increasing landowner's rents over time (due to the
limited supply of land) cut into the profits of capitalists from above; secondly,
wage goods (from agriculture) will be rising in price over time and this then cuts
into profits from below as workers require higher wages. This, then, introduces a
quicker limit to growth than Smith allowed, but Ricardo also claimed (at first)
that this decline can be happily checked by technological improvements in
machinery (albeit, also with diminishing productivity) and the specialization
brought by trade, although he also had stationary states.
Malthusianism is the idea that population growth is potentially exponential while
the growth of the food supply or other resources is linear, which eventually
reduces living standards to subsistence levels.. Thomas Robert Malthus, in his
1798 writings, An Essay on the Principle of Population believed there were two
types of "checks" that are continuously at work, limiting population growth
based on food supply at any given time:
● preventive checks, such as moral restraints or legislative action — for example
the choice by a private citizen to engage in abstinence and delay marriage
until their finances become balanced, or restriction of legal marriage or
parenting rights for persons deemed "deficient" or "unfit" by the government.
● positive checks, such as disease, starvation, and war, which lead to high rates
of premature death — resulting in what is termed a Malthusian catastrophe.
Such a catastrophe inevitably has the effect of forcing the population (quite
rapidly, due to the potential severity and unpredictable results of the
mitigating factors involved, as compared to the relatively slow time scales and
well-understood processes governing unchecked growth or growth affected by
preventive checks) to "correct" back to a lower, more easily sustainable level.
42
Introduction to Growth
3.3 MARXIAN THEORY OF GROWTH
Models
The Karl Marxian model of economic growth is available in his famous
book "Das-Capital". He rejects the salient features of classical model of
economic growth. He rejected the law of diminishing returns and says
that the final outcome of stationary state in classical model is not a natural
process, it is due to human arrangements. He also rejects Malthusian
theory of population.
Marx’s theory seeks to combine economics and sociology and views
economic development as a continuous change in the social, cultural and
political life of society. In this theory, economic systems reach higher
stages through strained relations between the dynamic forces of
production and slowly evolving social and political organisation which
permits production. The stages of development: a) primitive-communal
society b) feudalism c) capitalism d) socialism e) communism.
43
3.4 STAGES OF GROWTH THEORIES:
ROSTOW AND KUZNETS
3.4.1 Rostow’s Theory
Walt W. Rostow has explained the transition from underdevelopment to
development in terms of a series of steps or stages through which all
countries must proceed. His work”The Stages of Economic Growth”
explains in detail the growth process via these stages:
a)The traditional society b)The preconditions for take-off c)The take-off
d)The drive to maturity e)High mass consumption.
Thus, as an economy takes on the path of growth there are economic,
social and institutional changes that kick-start growth rather slowly and
then the economy grows rapidly before it saturates to a high income level.
3.4.2 Kuznet’s Theory
Simon Kuznets gave the concept of Modern Economic Growth and defined the
economic growth of a country as “a long-term rise in capacity to supply
increasingly diverse economic goods to its population, this growing capacity
based on advancing technology and the institutional and ideological adjustments
that it demands.” He defined 6 basic characteristics of Modern Economic
Growth:
1.High rates of growth of per capita output and population
2.High rates of increase in Total Factor Productivity
3.High rates of structural transformation of the economy
4.High rates of social and ideological transformation
5.The propensity of economically developed countries to reach out to the rest of
the word for markets and raw materials
6.The limited spread of economic growth to only one-third of the world’s
population
Kuznets observed these for a large number of developed countries. He said that
the 6 characteristics are mutually reinforcing and inter-related.
He developed an approach to the analysis of economic growth over long
historical periods he called as an “economic epoch”. The innovation/scientific
knowledge and its application define an epoch and thus, economic growth and
structural change.
Introduction to Growth
Models
46
Harrod-Domar model of growth, which laid the foundation of growth( Introduction to Growth
given constant returns)on the process of capital accumulation. The Models
mobilisation of savings into Investment would help a country achieve
growth via accumulation of capital in this model. Solow Model added to
this by introducing the role of labour in the given framework and
extended it further to technological advancements. Diminishing returns to
individual factors of production is Solow’s twist to the Harrod Domar
Model. The model predicts the convergence of long run growth across
countries via the Stady state.
4.0 OBJECTIVES
After reading this unit you should be able to:
Describe the context and background in which this model came to be
developed by two different economists, each working independently enters at
the others, but still reaching the same results;
Discuss the role of savings and investment in the growth process, as
expounded by Harrod, and the implication of this relationship;
Identity the similarities and dissimilarities between the Harrod Model and the
Domar Model;
Develop an integrated view of the Harrod Model and the Domar Model; and
Analyse the strengths and limitations of this integrated model.
Shri Saugato Sen, Associate Professor IGNOU, New Delhi
Harrod-Domar Growth
4.1 INTRODUCTION Model
Economic growth, as you have seen in Unit 3, refers to a process of sustained
increase in real national income of a country. A number of theories have tried to
study the process of economic growth as it has unfolded in the past especially
within the free market framework. These theories are economic growth are also
referred to as growth models, especially when the quantitative interrelationships
among the critical variables in the process of economic growth are set out in a
rigorous form. In the remaining units of this block and the subsequent two
blocks you will study in depth about different models of economic growth as
formulated by different economists at different point of time. Each of these
models emphasises upon a different sector or a set of factors that in the opinion
of their exponents is the major factor that influenced economic growth. In this
unit, we begin with an in-depth analysis of what had come to be known as the
Harrod-Domar Model (HDM) of growth.
51
Growth Models: income. The larger must be the absolute volume of net investment, maintenance
Theory & Evidence
of full employment, therefore, required an ever-expanding amount of net
investment. This, in turn, required a continuous growth in real national income.
Capital accumulation and growth of income must go side by side.
An increase in capital expands the productive capacity of the economy. If it is
not accompanied by an increase in income, any of the following things may
happen:
The new capital may remain untitled.
The new capital may replace old capital depriving the latter of its labour
and/or markets.
The new capital may be substituted for labour (and possibly other
factors).
Thus, increase in capital unaccompanied by an increase in income would result
into unemployment of capital and /or labour. Excessive capital accumulation
may result into overproduction and consequently into a fall in investment leading
to depression.
4.2.2 Assumption of the Model
The HDM is based on the following assumption:
1. An initial full-employment level of income exists.
2. There is no government interference in the functioning of the economy.
3. The exogenous factors do not influence the growth variables, i.e., it is a
closed economy model.
4. There are no lags in adjustment, i.e., the economic variables like savings,
investment, income, expenditure adjust themselves in the same period. Any
change in saving brings about the corresponding change in investment in the
same period.
5. The average propensity to save(S/Y) and marginal propensity to save(∆S/∆Y)
are equal to each other, i.e,. the absolute change in saving is equal to the
relative change in saving.
6. Propensity to save and "capital coefficient"(capital-output ratio) are constant.
The law of constant returns operated because of the fixity of capital-out ratio.
7. Income, investment and savings are all defined in the net sense. It implies
that these variables exclude depreciation.
8. Saving and investment are equal in ex-ante and ex-post sense, i.e., accounting
and functional equality between saving and investment the equality can be
expressed as:
S0 = I0 (accounting equality)
Se = Ie (functional equality)
52
S0 and I0 are observed saving and investment. Se and Ie are expected saving and Harrod-Domar Growth
investment. Model
All these assumptions are not necessary for the final solution of the problem;
nevertheless, they serve the purpose of simplifying the analysis.
53
Growth Models: Y I S
Theory & Evidence
or Y Y Y
I S
Y Y
or I=S
The equality between saving and inves
tment (export sense) is thus a necessary condition for achieving steady growth. It
is also called the dynamic equilibrium.
2. Warranted Growth Rate (Gw) - It is the full capacity growth rate of income
in an economy. It is also known as 'full employment growth rate' or 'potential
growth rate'. The equation for warranted growth can be stated as follows:
GwCr = s ......................(2)
where,
Gw = warranted growth rate
Cr = amount of capital required to maintain the warranted growth rate
s = saving-income ratio
Eq.(2) states that if the economy is to advance at the steady rate of Gw that will
fully utilise its capacity, income must grow at the rate of s/Cr per year, i.e.,
Gw = s/Cr. If income grows at the warranted rate, the capital stock of the
economy will be fully utilised; the entrepreneurs will be willing to continue to
invest the amount of saving generated at full potential income. Gw is therefore, a
self-sustaining rate of growth and if the economy continues to grow at this rate, it
will follow the equilibrium path shown in.
I2 I
I1
S3
SAVING & INVESTMENT
S2
S1
S1
INCOME
Fig.4.1.
54
In Fig.4.1, income is measured along the horizontal axis, and saving and Harrod-Domar Growth
investment are measured along the vertical axis. It would be seen that the change Model
55
Growth Models: B. State of disequilibrium when G < Gw
Theory & Evidence
In this situation, the growth rate of income is less than the growth rate of output.
There would be more goods for sale but the income would be insufficient to
purchase these goods. There would be deficiency of demand and the economy
would face the problem of over production.
Similarly, when C>Cr, actual amount of capital would be larger than the required
amount of capital for investment. The larger amount of capital available for
investment. The larger amount of capital available for investment would lower
the marginal efficiency of capital in the long-period. Secular decline in the
marginal efficiency of capital would lead to depression and unemployment.
Economic growth under the situation of depression cannot be stable.
Harrod stated that once g departs from Gw, it will further depart away from
equilibrium. He writed: 'Around that line of advance which it adhered to would
alone give satisfaction, centrifugal forced are at work, causing the system to
depart further and further form the required line of advance." Thus, equilibrium
between G and Gw is a knife-edge equilibrium. It follows that one of the major
tasks of public policy is to bring G and Gw together in order to mainatain long-
run stability.
For this purpose, Harrod introduces his third concept of natural rate of growth.
3. Natural Growth-rate (Gn).
It is the maximum growth rate that an economy can achieve with its available
natural resources. The equation for the natural growth rate can be state as
follows:
Gn Cr = or ≠ s ................(3)
It stated that the natural growth rate is determined by macro variables like
population, technology, natural resources and capital equipment. These factors,
place a ceiling beyond which expansion of output is not possible.
Interaction between G, Gw and Gn
Comparing Gw and Gn, it may be concluded that Gn may or may not be equal to
Gw. In case Gn happen to be equal to Gw, the condition of steady growth would
prevail. But such a possibility is remote one because a variety of factors
(influencing Gn and Gw) come into play and make balance between these two
growth-rated difficult. There exists a greater probability of inequality between
Gn and Gw. It may take two terms:
(a) Gw>Gn
(b) Gn>Gw
(a) Gw>Gn: It Gw exceeds Gn, G would lie below Gn for most of the time.
56
In this situation, there would be a tendency for cumulative recession. A Harrod-Domar Growth
downward trend would set in, resulting in unemployment and depression. Model
However, downward trend cannot continue indefinitely. The reason is that lower
limit to depression is set by the minimum consumption level. The consumption
cannot fall below a minimum level. The minimum consumption requirements
can be made possible by reducing the working capital. The entrepreneurs may
not reduce fixed capital in the hope that future might entail bright prospects for
investment. These two factors would gradually set the wheels of recovery in
motion. The economy would experience upward trend.
(b) Gn>Gw: In this situation, G would also exceed Gw for most of the time,
There would be a tendency for cumulative boom and full employment. Such a
situation will create inflationary trend. To check this trend, savings should be
encouraged, as these would ensure a high level of employment without
inflationary pressures.
4.3.2 Assumptions of the model
The HM is based on the following assumptions:
The level of ex-ante aggregate saving is a constant proportion of aggregate
income. It means propensity to save is assumed to be constant.
Technical progress has been assumed to be labour argumenting or 'neutral'.
This implies that neutral technical progress is the basis of the model.
The requirements of capital and labour per unit of output are constant, i.e.,
capital-output and labour-output ratios are assumed constant.
Constant returned to scale operate. This implies that output increased at a
constant rate.
4.3.3 Policy Implications of the Model
The policy implications of the model are simple and straight forward. These can
be briefly summarised as follows:
Saving is a virtue in any inflationary gap economy and a vice in a deflationary
gap economy. In an advanced economy the saving coefficient, s, has to be
moved up or down as the situation demanded.
4.3.4 The Harrod Model and Trade Cycles
Harrod has used his model to explain trade cycles. In the recovery phase,
because of the existence of unemployed resources, G>Gn. When full
employment is reached G=Gn. If Gw exceeds Gn at the full employment, slump is
inevitable. Since G had to fall below Gw, it will, for the time being, be driven
progressively downwards. Further, G itself fluctuated during the course of the
business cycle. Savings as a fraction of income, though fairly steady in the long
run, fluctuate in the short run. In the short run, savings tend to be residual
between the earning and normal consumption. Companies, also, are likely to
save a large portion of their short-period increased in net receipts. Thus, even it
57
Growth Models: Gw is normally below Gn, it is likely to ride above Gn in the later stages of
Theory & Evidence advance, and, if it so happens, a vicious spiral of depression is inevitable when
full employment is reached. If Gw does not ride above Gn in the course of
advance, there would be continued pressure to advance when full employment is
reached; this would lead to inflation and consequently, sooner or later, to a rise of
Gw above Gn, resulting ultimately into a vicious spiral of depression. Actually, G
may be reduced before the employment is reached because of immobilities,
frictions, and bottlenecks and, if it so happens, depression may come before full
employment is reached. If Gw is far above Gn, G may never rise far above Gw
during the revival and the depression may result long before full employment is
reached.
4.3.5 Critique of the Harrod Model
The instability in Harrod's model is due to the rigidity of its basic assumptions,
viz. fixed production function, a fixed saving ratio, and a fixed growth rate of
labour force. Economists have attempted to relieve this rigidity by permitting
capital and labour substitution in the production function, by making the saving
ratio a function of the profit rate and the growth rate of labour force as a variable
in the growth process.
Check Your Progress 1
1. Why is the model discussed in this unit known as the Harrod-Domar
Model?
2. State in brief the basic formulations of the Harrod model of growth.
3. How does the Harrod model explain the occurrence of trade cycles?
58
Harrod-Domar Growth
4.4 THE DOMAR MODEL (DM) Model
The fundamental question around which E.D. Domar builds his model can be
stated as follows:
Investment leading to an increase in productive capacity and income, what
should be the rate of increase in investment which would equalise the increase in
income and the increase in productive capacity, so that full employment is
maintained?
Domar answers this question by forging a link between aggregate supply and
aggregate demand through investment.
4.4.1 Statement of the Model
Domar model is based on the dual character of investment: one , investment
increases productive capacity, and two, investment generated income,. The two
sides of investment provide solution for steady growth. The following symbols
are used in DM.
Yd = Level of national income or level of effective demand at full employment
(demand side)
Ys = Level of productive capacity or supply at full employment level (supply
side)
K = real capital
I = net investment, which implies change in stock of real capital, i.e. ∆K
d = marginal propensity to save, which is the reciprocal of multiplier i.e.,
(mp =1/multiplier)
= productivity of capital
We can make use of these notations to frame a set of equations that help
formulate the DM.
The demand side of investment can be represented by an equation as follows:
Yd = I/d
This equation explains two things as follows:
(i) The level of effective demand (Yd) is directly related to the level of
investment(I). An increase in investment will result in an increase in effective
demand, and vice versa.
(ii) The effective demand is inversely related to the marginal propensity to save
(d). An increase in marginal propensity to save will decrease the level of
effective demand and vice-versa.
Eq.(1) represents the demand side of investment.
The supply side of investment can be represented by an equation as follows:
Y = k ....................(2)
59
Growth Models: Eq.(2) explains that supply of output(Ys) at full employment depends upon two
Theory & Evidence
factors, ie.., productive capacity of capital( ) and the amount of real capital(K).
A change in the supply of any of these will result in a corresponding change in
the supply of output. For example, an increase in the productivity of capital will
result in an increase in output, and vice-versa. Likewise, an increase in the
amount of real capital will lead to an increase in output, and vice-versa.
Equilibrium: In equilibrium, the demand and supply should balance. Therefore,
Yd = Ys
or I/d = K
By cross multiplication,
I = d K .............................(3)
Eq.(3) explains the condition for steady growth.
Steady growth is possible when:
Investment equals the product of saving-income ratio, capital productivity and
capital stock. From this the condition for maintaining the steady growth can be
explained. For this we have to give increment to the demand and supply
conditions presented above.
The demand equation in its incremental form can be stated as follows:
∆Yd = ∆I/d ........................(4)
Increments have been shown in the level of effective demand and investment
because they are variables, but increment has not been shown in d because it is
constant in terms of the assumptions employed.
The supply equation it its incremental form can be stated as follows:
∆Ys = ∆K ........................(5)
Eq.(5) explains that change in the supply of output (∆Ys) would be equal to the
product of change in real capital (∆K), and the productivity of capital ( ). The
change in real capital is expressed as net investment. Therefore, ∆K represented
investment(I). Substituting I in place of ∆K in eq.(5), we get.
∆Ys = I ........................(6)
The equilibrium between eq.(4) and eq.(6) provides us the condition for
maintaining the steady growth. In equilibrium
∆Yd = ∆Ys
or ∆I/d = I
cross-multiplying , we get,
∆I/I = d .......................(7)
Eq.(7) explains that the growth-rate of net investment ∆I/I should be equal to the
product if marginal propensity to save (d) and productivity of capital ( ). This
60
equality must be maintained to ensure stable and steady growth. Donar gives a Harrod-Domar Growth
numerical example to explain this condition of maintaining steady growth. Model
61
Growth Models: Check Your Progress 2.
Theory & Evidence
1) Discuss the principal features of the Domar Model of growth.
2) State the conditions necessary for steady growth.
3) State the conditions necessary for maintaining for maintaining steady
growth.
62
Parameter Domar Harrod Harrod-Domar Growth
Model
1. Long-run difficulty "Under-investment Labour shortage
sapping growth" deflecting growth
2. Position of labour Shortage of certain Determinant of natural
input labour may trigger rate of growth:
scrapping and the key element
inhibition of investment;
optional element
3. Centrifugal force Continuously undermined Unstable adjustment
from equilibrium investment incentives process
4. Reason for fixed Assumed for inconvenience Due to fixed interest
rate,
capital output ratio low substitutability,
etc.
65
UNIT 5 THE NEOCLASSICAL GROWTH
MODEL
Structure
5.0 Objectives
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Some Basic Concepts and Tools to Study Growth Models
5.3 The Solow Model
5.3.1 Assumptions
5.3.2 The structure of the model
5.3.3 A comparison with the Harrod-Domar Model
5.0 OBJECTIVES
After going through the unit, you will be able to:
apply some essential techniques to study growth models in general;
discuss the neo-classical growth model ;
point out the difference between the Harrod-Domar model and neo-classical
model(s);
apply the neo-classical growth models in the analysis of certain economic
topics like savings, fiscal policy, poverty, and so on;
explain the comparative growth experiences of nations using the neo-
classical model; and
examine how the concepts of money and monetary processes have been
brought into the neo-classical model.
Shri Saugato Sen Associate Professor of Economics, IGNOU, New Delhi
The Neoclassical
5.1 INTRODUCTION
Growth Model
The previous two units of this block have introduced you to the concepts of
economic growth and development, as well as the Harrod-Domar growth model.
You saw how important economic growth is, how it differs from development,
why we should study growth models and what the limitations of economic
growth can be. The Harrod-Domar model was presented to you both as a unified
model, as well as separately the models of Harrod and Domar. You became
familiar with the model’s assumptions, its structure, limitations as well as some
applications, including application in Indian economic planning.
This unit presents for discussion a model which was put forward by Robert
Solow and Trevor Swan, independently of each other, in 1956, although brief
anticipations of the basic idea was carried out by James Tobin. However it is
commonly known as the Solow-Swan model, or even as the Solow model. Solow
has done a lot to popularise the model through subsequent papers and books. The
Solow model has proved to be one of the most used most robust, and standard
models in all of economic theory. Several economists of more than one
generation have built upon, extended and refined the Solow model. Even when
some have put forward new models, they did so referring to the Solow model as
the model that they critiqued and found limitations with. Empirical economists
spent lots of time, effort, energy to examine data sets and use statistical tools to
see if predictions which can be generated out of the Solow model, have actually
been matched by the performances of group of countries. Solow justly received a
Nobel Prize for his contribution to growth theory, and as he remarked with a
touch of pride during the address he gave at the time of receiving the prize, his
model started a “cottage industry [of model- building in growth theory]”.
In this unit we study the neoclassical growth model. We begin by acquainting
you with some tools and techniques you are going to need to study growth
models, not only in this unit, but in subsequent units as well. Once you have
familiarised yourself with these concepts, you will be introduced to the basic
neoclassical model, with the assumptions stated and the structure spelled out and
elaborated. Some applications and extensions of the model are presented ,
following which we bring in monetary factors into the basic neoclassical model.
We close the discussion with a study of the very important and relevant topics of
convergence and poverty traps.
log( yt / yo )
r = anti log 1
n
This assumes constant rate of growth. r (as in a constant rate of interest in
compound interest formulations)
When the r.o.g is not constant, it is say
x1 , x2 ,........xi ............xt in t=1,2,.......i,......t
1
t
then r = (x1 , x2 ,........xt )
It is geometric mean.
Calculation of Growth Rates
Consider the following data on rice production:
Year Rice Production Year Rice Production
(in lakhs of tonnes) (in lakhs of tonnes)
1990 8 1997 18
1991 9 1998 18
1992 13 1999 18
1993 12 2000 23
1994 13 2001 23
1995 20 2002 26
1996 19 2003 28
2004 27
2005 24
(i) A crude interpretation of the growth rate is given as an average percentage
change from first year to the last year, in this example, average growth rate
would be
24 8
8 100
16
13.3%
This method overemphasises original and terminal values of data. Also, it does
not use all observations.
(ii) Linear growth rate : The estimated regression using the given data turn out to
be:
yt = 8.1 + 1.2.45 t
Three different growth rates may be completed by making following
manipulations:
70
The Neoclassical
1.245 Growth Model
(a) growth rate = y 100 8 100
0
15.57%
1.245
_
100 100
(b) growth rate = 18.6875
y
6.66%
1.245
100 100
(c) growth rate = HM ( y ) 16.286
7.64%
(iii) Compound growth rate: Value of in the log-linear relation:
ln yt ln t
Growth
As an example, let’s model population growth
dp 1 dp / dt
.
dt p p
dp
is called the absolute growth rate,
dt
dp
/ p is called relative growth.
dt
US population in millions 1790-1990
71
Growth Models: Example: U.S. Population in million 1790-1990
Theory & Evidence
Year Population
1790 3.9
1800 5.3
1810 7.2
1820 9.6
1830 12.9
1840 17.1
1850 23.1
1860 31.4
1870 38.6
1880 50.2
1900 76.0
1910 92.0
1920 105.7
1930 122.8
1940 131.7
dp
Suppose we went to estimate relative growth ( / p ) from 1790 to 1860 let us
dt
dp
take one particular year, say 1830. If we want to estimate / p in 1830 we take
dt
the rate of change in the population, and divide it by the population itself:
1 dp 1 popin1840 popin1830
p dt pop.in1830 10 years
1 17.1 12.9
. 0.0326 3.26%
12.9 10
P10 P0 (1 3.47)
P10 P0 (1 0.347 10)
72
1830 3.26% The Neoclassical
Growth Model
1840 3.57%
1850 3.53%
How do we calculate average relative growth rate for the period?
The simplest model is to answer that the relative growth rate is constant, i.le.
1 dp
k
p dt
1. Arithmetic growth (simple growth): growth by a constant amount in each
time period.
2. Geometric growth (exponential growth): growth by a constant proportion
in each time period.
3. Nominal rate of interest & effective rate of interest; compounding period.
If we have a photo & enlarge it 3 times, new are is 9 (old area).
Correct are the following
New area is 9 times the area of the original
New area is 9 times as large as the original
New area is 9 times as great as the original
Incorrect are
New area is 9 times greater than the original
New area is 9 times more than the original
New area is 9 times larger than the original
“9 times greater than” means “10 times as great as”.
B. An increase from 1 to 9 is an increase of 800%, Not 900%. If support
for a political party decreases from 60% to 30% it has dropped 30
percentage points but decreased 50%.
C. When speaking of reductions also we must be careful. A reduction
from 9 to 1 means the new amount is 1/9th as much, 8/9th less than,
11% as much as in89% less than the original.
Growth and change
Let x be an economic variable.
Let x0 be the initial value.
x1 be the subsequent value.
The proportional change in going from x0 to x1 is simply
x1 x0 x
x0 x0
73
Growth Models: The percentage change in going from x0 to x1 is simply 100 times the
Theory & Evidence
proportionate change:
% x = 100 ( x/x0)
If x is itself in percentage it becomes tricky.
If unemployment decreases from 15% to 12% it is a reduction of 3 percentage
15 12 3
points, but a 100 100 20% fall in unemployment.
15 15
5
Time as regressor
A linear trend relationships would be depicted as:
y T (1)
where T indicates time. One has to appropriately define the origin
Constant growth covers
yt T t
yt 1 T 1 t 1
yt yt 1 ( t 1 )
y1 1 t .......1
If one suspects that a series has a constant growth rate, plotting the log of the
series against time provides a quick check. If the series is approximately linear,
(3) can be fitted by least squares, regressing the log of y against time. The
resultant slope coefficient then provides as estimates g of the growth rate,
namely,
74
The Neoclassical
b= ln(1+ g ) giving g =eb-1 Growth Model
The coefficient of (1) represents the continuous rate of change ln yt / t ,
whereas g represents the discrete case. Formulating a constant growth series in
continuous time gives
yt y0e t
ln yt t
Thus, taking first difference of logs given the continuous growth rate, which in
turn is an approximation to the discrete growth rate. This approximation is only
reasonably accurate for small values of g.
Example
Bituminous coal Ot in the U8 1841-1910
Decade Av.annual Ot lny t t(my)
_______________________________________________________
1841-1850 1837 7.5159 -3 -22.5457
1851-1860 4868 8.4904 -2 -16.9809
1861-1870 12411 9.4904 -1 -9.4263
1871-1880 32617 10.3926 0 0
1881-1890 82770 11.3238 1 11.3238
1891-1900 148457 11.9081 2 23.8161
1901-1910 322958 12.6853 3 38.0558
________________________________________________________
Sum 71.7424 0 24.2408
_______________________________________________________
Plotting the log of output against time, we find a linear relationship. So we will
fit a constant growth and estimate the annual growth rate. Setting the origin for
time at the centre of the 1870s and taking a unit of time to be 10 years, we obtain
the t series shown on the table. From the data in the table
ln y 71.7424
10.2489
a = n 7
t ln y 24.2408
b = 0.8657
t2 28
The r2 for this regression is 0.9945, confirming the linearity of the scatter. The
estimated growth rate per decade is obtained from
75
Growth Models:
Geometric mean growth rate is the same thing as compound growth rate.
Illustrations
Take company X’s sales for 6 years
76
Year (Net sales) Annual growth The Neoclassical
Growth Model
1979 216,283
1980 260,404 20.4%
1981 294,145 13.0%
1982 285,954 -2.8%
1983 303,498 6.2%
1984 318,842 5.1%
(1 gt ) 1
t 1
The arithmetic mean growth rate 8.4% is > the geometrics mean growth rate
(8.1%). In fact values all give the same, A.M.G.K. will be > G.M.G.R.
Only if gi-n are constant, will amgv=gmgr.
78
5.3.2 Structure of The Model The Neoclassical
Growth Model
Since we have assumed there is no depreciation, we consider the model here in
the absence of depreciation. Later on, we shall discuss the case when there is
depreciation of capital. To begin with consider the aggregate production function.
Y=F(K,L)
We have assumed that there are constant returns to scale. This means that if K &
L are increases by a proportion , Y increases by the same proportion. The
function F is homogenous of degree one.
Y=F(λK,λL) for all λ>1
d
q,g f(k)
k
A ray od to any point d on the curve has a slobe that gives the ratio of output to
Q
Q
capital. This is because the of this ray is L =
K K
L
79
Growth Models: This is the is verse of capital output ratio v. Each point on the production
Theory & Evidence
function is the slow model is that …………..Harrad-Domar model, l is not fixed
or exogenous different points on the production function show different, capital
output ratios.
Equilibrium Growth
We have k K
L
Taking natural logarithms (denoted by Ln), we get
K
ln (k)=ln
L
K
ln k=ln
L
or, ln k=ln K-ln L
dk 1 dK 1 dL 1
. . - .
dt k dt K dt L
or k K L
dK
Now on the right hand side is equal to investment I
dt
Investment = facing in equilibrium. So
dK
K S
dt
S SQt (as we have assumed)
dK
So sQt (t is the subscript denotes Q at a point of time)
dt
dL 1
The Second term on the right hand side is L . which shows the
dt L
proportional growth rate of labour. Which we have denoted n. So our equation
k K L
can be written
sQ
k n
K
80
Dividing Q and K by L we get The Neoclassical
Growth Model
sq sf (k )
k n n …………………………………………..(A)
k k
This gives k , the rate of growth of k, is term of k itself.
dk 1 dk
The equilibrium value of k is the one for which . is 0, i.e. 0 or where
dt k dt
k, once it reaches that value, does not change. Setting k 0 in the equation
above, we get
sf ( k * )
k 0 n
k*
sf ( k * )
or
k* n
where an * above k denotes its equilibrium value.
nk
q q* f (k *) nk
or sf (k *) NK *
f(k)
C/L
sf(k
q*
o k
k*
81
Growth Models: At any point to the left of k*, where k<k*,
Theory & Evidence
f ( k ) n s k
This implies
sf (k )
n
k
And from equation (A), we can sea that in this case k 0, which mean that when
k k *, k increase
Similarly we can show that whenever k>k* ( to the right of k*), k is rising and
where k>k*, k is falling. Thus k* is a stable equilibrium point.
In equilibrium, when k equals k*, q reaches an equilibrium q*. As q* is a
constant,
d 1 dL 1
. . n
dt t dt t
The economy thus converges to a steady state growth where K and capital
output ratio v is constant. However, and K are not greater than L but equal to
it.
The equilibrium condition in the Solow model
sf (k *)
n
k*
can be written as
Q
n f (k ) q Q 1
L
s k k K K V*
L
Where V is the capital output ratio.
S
So we have n , the Harrod-Domar condition for balanced full employment
V*
growth. However the Solow model allows V to vary and explains how the
economy will turn toward a growth bath along with the Harrod-Domar condition
is and there in the Solow model, the capital output ratio V* emerges as an
equilibrium value, and not as a necessary technology assumption.
CONSUMPTION IN THE SOLOW MODEL
We know that in a closed economy with no government intervention in
equilibrium
Y CI
Where Y is aggregate output , C is aggregate consumption and I is investment.
82
Writing in per-worker ………., we have The Neoclassical
Growth Model
Y C I
L L L
Y
We know y f (k )
L
C I
So f (k ) …………………………………..(B)
L L
Now consider capital labour ratio
kK
L
dk 1 dK 1 dL 1
We have seen . . .
dt k dt k dt L
Or k K L
Where denotes proportional growth rate. We had already denoted L by n
So we have
k K n
k K dX
or n where X denotes Multiplying both sides by K/L we get
k k dt
k K K K nK
. .
k L K L L
K
or k nk
L
Alternatively putting it;
K
k nk …………………………………………..(C )
L
Since one of the assumptions we had made was that there is no depreciation,
hence
dK
k I
dt
So we may write equation (C) as
I
k nK
L
I
In equation (B) we can replace by the right hand side of the above equation.
L
Equation (B) then becomes
83
Growth Models: C
Theory & Evidence f (k ) k nK …………………………………………..(D)
L
This equation states the following: Output per worker (since we are taking as
equal to Y and hence q=y) is put to three uses which are shown on the right hand
C
side. First, consumption per worker ; a portion of investment nk, that
L
maintains the capital labour ratio constant in the face of growing labour force;
and a portion of investment, k which increases the capital labour ratio. When
capital goods increase faster then the increase in labour, so that the capital-labour
ratio rises, it is called capital deepening, while when capital goods rise merely to
keep pace with the rise in labour force so that the capital labour ratio remains
constant, it is called capital widening. Thus output per worker, in equation D, is
divided among consumption per worker, capital deepening and capital widening.
We can arrive at equation D by a different route, from our fundamental equation
of the Solow Model.
Recall that the fundamental equation, equation (A) is
sf (k ) sq
k n n
k k
k
Since k , hence multiplying the above equation throughout by k, we get
k
k sq nk
Recall our assumption that q = y. We have
k sy nk
Y sY
Since y , we have k nk
L L
We had made the assumption that S = sY
Now in equilibrium S =Y-C = I
Y C
Hence we have k nk
L L
Y
Now switching back in rotation f(k) for , we have
L y
C
k f (k ) nk
L
C
or f (k ) k nk
L
which is equation (D).
84
What are the basic proposition and conclusion that we get from the Solow The Neoclassical
model? Does it provide some guidelines for studying the growth trajectories of Growth Model
actual economies? We give below some theoretical conclusions that emerge from
the Solow model.
First, given the assumptions as stated earlier, there exists a steady state (balanced
growth) solution for the model. The balanced growth solution is stable. Stability
is there in that whenever the initial values of all the variables, the economy
eventually mark to the study state equilibrium value of y and k. We have already
seen this from the diagram.
The second conclusion we get that the balanced rate of growth (all ……….. grow
at the same rate) is the constant exogenous grow the of labour force, which is n.
85
Growth Models: sf (k )
Theory & Evidence Or k (n )
k
This is a modified form of the fundamental equation of the Solow model. The
fasic analysis that we studied, carrier over for the case of depreciating capital; we
merely need to replace n by (n+ ).
Poverty Traps
Empirically, the convergence by pother is has not held up very well. The neo-
clinical model has not been very successful an showing why rates of growth
differ across nations. One fact was staring everyone in the face: many rations of
the world were poor. In a sense, what was going on was the exact opposite of
what was suggested by the convergence hypothesis: Some countries were shifting
stagnant growth, while other were progressing very fact. This idea that the poorer
nations were actually caught is a traphas come to be called poverty trap. It is a
trap because inspite of efforts. These nations stay a low-level ‘equilibrium’.
There are tw o types of poverty traps: technological-Induced and population
induced. They can both be demonstrated in the Solow system.
86
per person. y f (k l ). Thus n, the population growth rate indirectly becomes a The Neoclassical
function of the capital labour ratio: Growth Model
n g k l
We may think of some interval k2 – k1 where for values of k below k1, n is <0,
but for values of k in the range [k2, k1] n is >0; again for values of k > k2, n may
become <0. Historically, in olden time in societies where k was below k1,
population was last theory wars, disease etc.
In our analysis, consider the range k2 – K1. Even here, n, although >0, can itself
increase or fall. In other words, although the population is increasing. The rate of
increase may itself vary. The idea is that, this leads to a situation where the
saving (or investment) curve changes shape and may turn out to be S shaped.
Then, we may have multiple equilibrium points of k most of which are unstable:
any movement from these points pushes the system far then away rather than
bringing it back into equilibrium. We have considered the interval (or range of
values between) [k2, K1] . Supposing we can two equilibrium points ka and kb.
Let ka lie between k1 and k2, i.e. k2>ka>k1. Let kb be greater than k2. Here ka is
the stable equilibrium while kb is the unstable one. n is the stable equilibrium
which creates the problem here. For any value of k leather k2, the economy is
pulled back to equilibrium level ka. Only if an injection of capital is gives which
pushed the k level above kb (where the equilibrium is unstable) will the k level
be given a “Big Push” and sent to higher and higher values and thus raising the
level of y via the f-function.
We mentioned the demographic transition which roughly says that n depends
only. But in the last century, due to advance is health care and ……….., low y
did not necessarily lead to low n. As death rates dropped, population increased.
On the other hand sub-Saharan African nation like Ethiopia did see n very low
(other nations are under populated) due to very low levels of y.
87
UNIT 6 ENDOGENOUS GROWTH MODELS
Structure
6.0 Objectives
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Assumptions of New Growth Theory (Endogenous Growth Models)
6.3 Endogenous Growth Models
6.3.1 Arrow’s Theory of Learning-by-doing
6.3.2 TheLevhari-Sheshinski Model
6.3.3 The King-Robson Model
6.3.4 Romer Model
6.3.5 The Lucas Model
6.3.6 Romer’s Model of Technological Change
6.4 Criticism of Endogenous growth models
6.5 Policy Implications for developed and developing countries
6.6 Let Us Sum Up
6.7 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises
6.0 OBJECTIVES
After going through the Unit, you will be able to:
Describe the emergence of Endogenous growth models;
List the assumptions of endogenous growth models;
Analyse the basic ideas on which these models rest and function in the
context of real world;
Discuss and evaluate the working of endogenous growth models;
Identify the limitations of these models; and
State the policy implications of these models.
6.1 INTRODUCTION
Endogenous growth theory was developed as a reaction to omissions and
deficiencies in the Solow (neoclassical) growth model. It is a new theory which
explains the long run growth rate of an economy on the basis of endogenous
factors as against exogenous factors of the neoclassical growth theory.
The new growth theory of the 1990s was labeled “endogenous growth theory”
because it attempted to explain technical change as the result of profit-motivated
research and development (R&D) expenditure by private firms. This was driven
by competition along the lines of what Schumpeter called product innovations (as
distinct from process innovations). In contrast to the Harrod-Domar model,
Dr Puja Saxena Nigam, Associate Professor, Economics, Hindu College, University of Delhi,
New Delhi
which viewed growth as exogenous, or coming from outside variables, the Endogenous Growth
endogenous theory emphasizes growth from within the system. This approach Models
enjoyed, and still enjoys, an enormous vogue, partly because it seemed to offer
governments a new means of promoting economic growth—namely, national
innovation policies designed to stimulate more private and public R&D spending.
While the neo-classical growth models explain the long run growth rate of output
based on exogenous variables namely rate of growth of population and rate of
growth of technical progress (independent of savings rate), the new growth
theory extends this by introducing endogenous technical progress in growth
models. The Endogenous growth models emphasize on technological progress
resulting from the rate of Investment, size of capital stock and stock of human
capital. The concept of economic growth here is thus, internal to the economy.
The theory is built on the idea that the improvements in innovation, knowledge
and human capital lead to increased productivity, positively affecting the
economic outlook.
The Endogenous growth theory challenges the idea of predicting growth without
incorporating technological advancements. Since economic growth is derived
from the growth rate of economic output per person, it would depend on the
productivity levels and these would in turn depend on the progress of
technological change. The endogenous growth theory considers these factors viz.
innovation and human capital as internal to the economy.
Models of Endogenous growth bear some structural resemblance to their
neoclassical counterparts but they differ considerably in their underlying
assumptions and conclusions drawn. The most significant theoretical differences
stem from discarding the neoclassical assumptions of diminishing returns to
capital investments, permitting increasing returns to scale in aggregate
production and frequently focusing on the role of externalities in determining the
rates of return on capital investments. By assuming that public and private
investments in human capital generate external economies and productivity
improvements that offset the natural tendency for diminishing returns,
endogenous growth theory seeks to explain the existence of increasing returns to
scale and the divergent long-term growth patterns among countries. While
technology still plays an important role in these models, exogenous changes in
technology are no longer necessary to explain long run growth.
The new growth theory reemphasizes the importance of savings and human
capital investments for achieving rapid growth just like Harrod-Domar model,
but it leads to several implications for growth that are in direct conflict with
traditional theory: a) there is no force leading to the equilibration of growth rates
across closed economies, it remains constant or differs according to savings rates
and technology levels and b)there is no tendency for per capita income levels in
poor countries that are capital scarce to catch up with rich countries. The best part
about this theory is that it seeks to explain the anomalous international flows of
capital that exacerbate wealth disparities between rich and poor countries.
89
Growth Models: The potentially high rates of return on investment offered by developing
Theory & Evidence economies with low capital-labour ratios are greatly eroded by lower level of
complementary investments in human capital (education and health),
infrastructure of R&D. Hence, poor countries benefit less from the social gains
associated with these. Since individuals do not internalize these gains by positive
externalities, the free market leads to sub optimal accumulation of
complementary capital in the society. The state can play a key role here by
improving the efficiency of resource allocation by provision of public goods/
infrastructure and encouraging private investments in knowledge-intensive
industries where human capital can be accumulated.
90
Endogenous Growth
6.3 ENDOGENOUS GROWTH MODELS
Models
6.3.1 Arrow’s Theory of Learning-by-doing
Learning-by-doing is a concept in economic theory by which productivity is
achieved through practice, self-perfection and minor innovations. Kenneth Arrow
used this concept in his design of Endogenous growth theory to explain the
effects of innovation and technological change. Arrow's classical paper “The
Economic Implications of Learning by doing” published in 1962 showed how
this idea fits into the modern theory of economic growth and used it as a
springboard for a critical consideration of spectacular recent developments. He
introduced the increases in per capita income that cannot be merely explained by
increases in capital-labour ratio. Identifying the role of technological change in
economic growth and providing an explanation of the concept of knowledge
which underlies a production function, he examined how knowledge has to be
acquired.
He therefore suggested an endogenous theory of the changes in knowledge which
underlie inter-temporal and international shifts in production functions. The
acquisition of knowledge called “learning” might be interpreted in different ways
yet it accepted by all schools of thought; learning is a product of experience. It
can only take place through the attempt to solve a problem and therefore, takes
place only during an activity. He generalized from many of the classical learning
experiments that learning associated with repetition of essentially the same
problem is subject to diminishing returns. There is an equilibrium response
pattern for any given stimulus, towards which the behaviour of the learner tends
with repetition. To have steadily increasing performance, then, implies that the
stimulus situations must themselves be steadily evolving rather than merely
repeating.
He emphasized the role of experience in increasing productivity that had yet to be
absorbed into the main corpus of economic theory. He thus, advanced the
hypothesis that technological change in general could be ascribed to experience
that is the very activity of production which gives rise to problems for which
favourable responses are selected over time. Hence, learning by doing is an
example of knowledge accumulation from the production process. As individuals
produce goods, ways of improving production processes happen inevitably. The
improvement in productivity occurs as a byproduct of normal production activity
and not as a result of deliberate efforts.
When learning by doing is the source of technological progress, the rate of
growth/accumulation of knowledge depends not on the proportion of GDP
devoted to R&D but from how much new knowledge is generated by traditional
productive activity. The production function can be written as
91
The simplest case of learning by doing is found in those situations where learning
occurs as a side effect of the production of new capital. Since, the increase in
knowledge is a function of increasing capital, the stock of knowledge is a
function of the stock of capital. There is only one stock variable whose behaviour
is endogenous here
A(t)=B K(t)β B and β are both greater than 0 --------(2)
If we put this in Equation (1) we get
Y(t)=K(t)α B1-α K(t)β(1-α) L(t)1-α
In the presence of learning, the contribution of capital is larger than its
conventional contribution: increased capital raises output not only through its
direct contribution to production [term K(t)α] but also by indirectly contributing
to the development of new ideas and making all other capital more productive
[term K(t) β(1-α)].
In a simplified form, the model is represented as the following:
Yi = A(K) F(Ki, Li)
Where for a firm i
Yi is output, Ki is the aggregate stock of capital and Li is the stock of labour
A is the technical factor and K represents the aggregate stock of capital
6.3.2 The Levhari-Sheshinski Model
Levhari and Sheshinski have generalized and extended Arrow’s model. They
stress on the spillover effects of increased investment as the source of
knowledge. They assume that the source of knowledge or learning by doing is
each firm’s investment. An increase in a firm’s investment leads to a concomitant
increase in its level of knowledge. An increase in a firm’s investment leads to a
parallel increase in its level of knowledge. The model assumes that the
knowledge of a firm is a public good which other firm can have at zero cost.
Thus, knowledge has a non-rival character which spills over across all the firms
in the economy. This is when each firm operates under constant returns to scale
and the economy as a whole is operating under increasing returns to scale.
This model explains endogenous technological progress in terms of knowledge or
learning by doing that is reflected in an upward raising of production function
and economic growth in the context of aggregate increasing returns being
consistent with competitive equilibrium.
6.3.3 The King-Robson Model
King and Robson in a paper published in 1993 emphasised learning by watching
in their technological progress function. Investment by a firm represents
innovation to solve the problems it faces. If it is successful, the other firms will
adopt the innovation to their own needs. Thus, externalities resulting from
learning by watching are a key to economic growth. This study shows that
92
innovation in one sector of the economy has the contagion or demonstration Endogenous Growth
effect on the productivity of other sectors, thereby leading to economic growth. Models
Multiple steady state growth paths exist, even for economies having similar
initial endowments and policies that increase investment should be pursued.
6.3.4 Romer Model
Romer in his first paper on endogenous growth in 1986 presented a variant on
Arrow’s Model which is known as learning by investment. He assumed creation
of knowledge as a side product of investment. He took knowledge as in input in
the production function of the following form:
Y = A(R) F (Ri,Ki, Li)
Where Y = Aggregate output, A(R) = public stock of knowledge from R&D
Ri = stock of results from expenditure on R&D by firm i , Ki = capital stock of
firm i and Li = labour input of firm i
He assumed the function F is homogenous of degree1 in all its inputs Ri, Ki, Li
and treats Ri as a rival good.
Romer took three key elements in his model: externalities, increasing returns in
the production of output and diminishing returns in the production of new
knowledge. It is the spillovers from research efforts by a firm that leads to the
creation of new knowledge by other firms. New research technology by a firm
spill over instantly across the entire economy. In this model, new knowledge is
the ultimate determinant of long run growth which is determined by investment
in research technology. Research technology exhibits diminishing returns which
means that investments in research technology will not double knowledge. Also,
the firm investing in research technology will not benefit exclusively from the
increase in knowledge. Other firms also benefit from new knowledge due to
inadequacy of patent protection. Hence, the production of goods from increased
knowledge displays increasing returns and competitive equilibrium is consistent
with increasing aggregate returns owing to externalities. Romer took investment
in research technology as endogenous factor in terms of the acquisition of new
knowledge by rational profit maximizing firms.
6.3.5 The Lucas Model
Robert Lucas utilized a model of endogenous growth developed by Uzawa.
Uzawa developed an endogenous growth model based on investment in human
capital. Lucas assumed that investment on education leads to the production of
human capital which is the crucial determinant in the growth process. He
classified this as: internal effects of human capital where the individual worker
undergoing training becomes more productive and external effects which
spillover and increases the productivity of capital and of other workers in the
economy.it is the investment in human capital rather than physical capital that
have spillover effects that increase the level of technology.
Thus, the output for firm i takes the form
93
Growth Models: Yi = A(Ki). (Hi)He
Theory & Evidence
Where A is the technical coefficient
Ki and Hi are the inputs of physical and human capital used by firm i to produce
output Yi
H is the economy’s average level of human capital and e is the parameter that
represents strength of the external effects from human capital to each firm’s
productivity
In the Lucas model, each firm faces constant returns to scale, while there are
increasing returns to scale for the whole economy. Learning by doing or on the
job training and spillover effects involve human capital. Each firm benefits from
the aggregate of human capital. Thus, it is not the accumulated knowledge or
experience of other firms but the average skills and knowledge in the economy
that are crucial for economic growth.
6.3.6 Romer’s Model of Technological Change
In 1990, Romer gave the model of endogenous technological change that
identified a research sector specializing in the production of ideas. This sector
invokes human capital along with the existing stock of knowledge to produce
ideas or new knowledge. The importance of ideas over resources is the
cornerstone of his analysis where he quotes Japan as an example, a country with
few natural resources but open to new western ideas and technology.
In this model, new knowledge enters into the production process in three ways-
a) A new design is used in the intermediate goods sector for the production of a
new intermediate input
b) In the final sector; labour, human capital and available producer durables
produce the final product
c) A new design increases the total stock of knowledge which increases the
productivity of human capital employed in the research sector.
The model is based on the following assumptions:
Economic growth comes from technological change
Technological change is endogenous
Market incentives play an important role in making technological changes
available in the economy
Invention of a new design requires a specified amount of human capital
The aggregate supply of human capital is fixed
Knowledge or a new design is assumed to be partially excludable and
retainable by the firm who invented it (patented design that cannot be
made or sold without the agreement of the inventor) but investment in
R&D can be done by other firms and benefits can be accrued thereof.
Technology is a non-rival input.
94
The new design can be used by firms and in different periods without
additional costs and without reducing the value of the input.
The low cost of using an existing design reduces the cost of creating new
designs.
When firms make investments in R&D and invent a new design, there are
externalities that are internalized by private agreements.
Technological production function in the model is given by
ΔA=F (KA, HA, A)
Where ΔA is the technology production function for technology ( Δ stands for
change in value; thus ΔA stands for change in technology)
KA is the amount of capital invested in producing the new design or technology
HA is the amount of human capital (labour) employed in R&D of the new design
A is the existing technology of designs.
The production function shows that technology is endogenous. When more
human capital is employed for R&D of new designs, then technology increases
by a larger amount that is A is greater. Since it is assumed that technology is a
non-rival input and partially excludable, there are positive spillover effects of
technology which can be used by other firms. Thus, the production of new
technology (knowledge or ideas) can be increased through the use of physical
capital, human capital and existing technology.
Check Your Progress 2
1. Explain the learning by doing model by Kenneth Arrow?
2. Examine the relevance of Paul Romer’s model of technological change in
explaining long run growth across countries.
7.0 OBJECTIVES
After going through this unit you should be able to :
Explain the meaning of growth accounting;
Discuss the influence of technology on growth;
Analyse the concept of convergence and whether empirically growth rates of
developing nations and developed nations are converging;
Examine the role of institutions, human capital, geography and culture in
determining economic growth; and
Explain the ideas of path dependence and historical lock-ins.
Saugato Sen, Associate professor, IGNOU, New Delhi
Growth Models: technology adoption. Concept like low productivity is also found useful to
Theory & Evidence predict exit of the firms in an economy, the ultimate performance standard. Its
importance can also be gauged from the attention it receives as a criterion to
evaluate policy interventions or firms’ decisions. The concept has relevance and
different meaning in different branches of economics. In industrial economics,
for example, a large literature investigates the effect of R&D on productivity and
the resulting impact on industry structure. In international economics, the efforts
to evaluate the impact of trade liberalization range from estimating changes in
price-cost margins to productivity changes. Fundamentally, the objective of
productivity measurement is to identify changes in output that cannot be
explained by changes in inputs.
Behind this concept most often stands the understanding that besides the
traditional factors of production labour and capital there is something else that
leads to the increase in production. Usually this ‘thing’ is associated with
technological progress. The latter concept itself can be interpreted in various
ways, but eventually it always implies that the combination of labour force,
machines, human knowledge and skills, leads to changes in total income that are
not expected by changes in capital or labour considered separately.
Growth (increase in GDP) of an economy is generally attributed to factors that
can be clubbed under two broad headings: Capital and Labour. But you will find
when you calculate it that Capital and Labour cannot account for all the growth
and in fact there is a residual factor that comes into play and accounts for the
increase in GDP. This factor is known as Total Factor Productivity. Let us try to
understand it on the basis of an equation:
Y= A ƒ(K,L)
Where Y is the output (GDP), K is the stock of physical capital invested and
L is the labour (number of man-hours). The letter A stands for Total Factor
Productivity.
Total Factor Productivity (TFP) as a concept is also important not only in the
context of macro-economic aggregate measures of a country's performance in
terms of per capita growth and productivity, but is of equal significance in
measuring the determinants of productivity and competitiveness of firms. The
hitherto more popular measure – labour productivity or value added per unit
labour – suffers from the shortcoming that it does not reveal why the
productivity has risen or vice-versa. Is it due to increased inputs of capital, or are
there other causes? The TFP approach while analysing performance, attempts to
go into the WHY of productivity changes and thus gives deeper insights into the
underlying causes and sustainability of growth.
Productivity keeps on changing as production continues. It improves under
favourable circumstances and deteriorates when unfavourable changes occur.
The changes that lead to higher productivity of inputs are technological
improvements, improvement in efficiency, increased education of labour,
improvement in the quality of labour due to training, etc. Today, TFP is
considered an important source of output growth worldwide
102
due to rapid progress in science and technology and various efficiency- Determinants of
enhancing measures. Growth
In the equation given above a higher value of A means that the same inputs lead
to more output and vice versa. It shows how efficiently that input is being used
to further the interests of the economy and it is the productivity of the capital
and labour investment. Total Factor Productivity is considered to be the actual
determining factor in the growth of an economy as both capital and labour
cannot continue to be invested indefinitely. Moreover the growth of economy, if
depended solely on capital and labour would decline as soon as these
investments in these inputs are reduced and vice-versa. Thus it is not a stable
growth. Hence increased Total Factor Productivity is the only way that an
economy can maintain a stable growth.
Also, the Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns, tells us that a sustained influx
of Labour and Capital will not achieve long term growth as the value of the
inputs get maximised; they onset to deliver lower returns over a period of time.
Thus the only way growth can be ensured and sustained is to maximise the
efficiency of these inputs and to work on improving the quality and quantity of
returns for the same amount of inputs i.e. to increase Total Factor Productivity.
Productivity is the main reason for economic growth. Some countries do better
than others primarily because they are more productive. Also, the more
productive a country is the better it is able to compete in the world markets as it
can keep cost low while still producing a superior product. A high level of
productivity also increases the standard of living of people in that country as
they would get better outputs for the same inputs i.e. have better quality products
at lower prices.
In order to conduct such an analysis, economists have built up a framework
called growth accounting to obtain a different perspective on the sources of
economic growth. Later we shall discuss that decomposing growth is essentially
a growth accounting exercise. We start with a production function that tells us
what output (Yt) will be at some particular time t is a function of the economy’s
stock of capital (Kt), its labour force (Lt), and the economy’s total factor
productivity (At). If output changes, it can only be because of the change in the
economy’s capital stock, its labour force, or its level of total factor productivity.
We are referring to the Cobb-Douglas form of the production function, which is:
Yt= At ƒ(Ktα, Lt1-α) …………………(1)
In this equation we can see that we would get higher output because of three
reasons – if more number of man hours are put in (higher L), if the people have
more equipment, etc to work with (higher K) or if capital and labour are used more
productively (higher A). The equation at (1) shows that it assumes perfect
competition and the constant returns to scale as depicted by the coefficients of K
and L. If we decompose the growth in output into each of the three elements
allotting 1/3rd of the increase in growth to capital and 2/3rd to labour (which is what
is seen in the most developed countries), the equation then becomes
103
Growth Models: Taking logs the growth in output (Y) is shown by the following equation
Theory & Evidence
lnY = lnA + 0.33 lnK + 0.67 lnL …………………(3)
Where lnY is the growth in output, lnK is the increase in capital, lnL is the increase in
labour and lnA is the increase in Total Factor Productivity (all these are for a particular
time period)
We can also use this equation to calculate growth in output per worker i.e. Labour
Productivity (Y/L). This can be written as
104
Determinants of
7.3 TECHNOLOGY AND GROWTH Growth
In the growth models that you studied, particularly Harrod-Domar and the Solow
model, the discussion was carried out in terms of how the output changed as a
result of change in the level of input use. As more of labour and capital was used
the output changed. We also discussed the important role of savings and
investment. However, the production conditions do not stay the same. As
technology improves, as technical progress takes place, inputs can be combined
more efficiently. More output can be obtained from the use of the same level of
input as before, or to produce the same amount of output as earlier, less use of
input is needed. In this section we build upon the discussion in the previous
section where we discussed growth accounting. In this section we discuss what
we mean by technical progress and analyse how technology is an important
determinant of economic growth.
You would have guessed by now that technical change has something to do with
improving the production process, and indeed so it is. We depict the change in
technical level by looking at the production function. Let us suppose for
simplicity that there is one single 'homogeneous' good in the economy. This good
gets produced by using capital and labour. The simplest way to conceptualise
technical progress is to understand that technical progress means that more output
is produced using the same amount of inputs. If you visualise a production
function, you can see that the production function shifting upward over time as
technical progress takes place. Another way to look at technical change
(improvement) is to say that the nature of the production function changed to a
superior one, or that the same amount of output can be produced by using less of
one or more factors than before.
The general way we have used to represent technical change as shifts in the
production function (it may also be depicted as shifts in the position of each
isoquant) can be expressed by bringing in time into the production function
explicitiy. The production function now becomes:
Y = F(K, L, t )
The argument t is a production function shifter.
Although the above formulation is the most geileral way of depicting technical
progress, there is another way of depicting technical change, where technical
progress takes place through shifts in the production hilction even though the
inputs used may not have increased. It is as though the factors of production were
somehow augmented and they are able to produce more output than before.
To understand technical change, we have to bear in mind that there are several
types of technical change. They have mostly to do with the capital-labour
intensity, and by implication, on the relative shares of capital and labour in tile
total product. This has repercussions on the remunerations of capital and labour,
105
Growth Models: that is, on the wage rate and rental of capital. If the capital labour ratio
Theory & Evidence capital intensity) goes up, it is called capital deepening.
Now let us begin our study of the classification of technical change, Before
doing so, let us recall our discussion of factor augmented technical progress.
We introduce a related concept here. Technical change can be embodied or
disembodied. Embodied technical change means that technical change assumes
the form in the change in the type of factor of production, usually capital. In
other words, embodied technical change is embodied in the form of new types
of machines (a new process or new technology).
Disembodied technical progress, on the other hand, means that regardless of the
type of machines, new or old, the same amount of factors can produce greater
amounts of output, or the same amount of output can be produced using lesser
quantities of inputs; in other words, the isoquant shifts inwards. The factor
augmenting technical change that we studied in the previous section is a
depiction of disembodied technical change. For most of this unit, we will have
occasion to consider disembodied technical change. Only in the final section do
we touch upon embodied technical change, and once you grasp the concept, you
will find greater use of the concept in some of the later units. In embodied
technical change, investment in new equipment or new skill is the essential
vehicle of improvements in technique.
Another concept with regard to technical change is neutrality. Neutrality
broadly means that technical change is neither labour saving nor capital saving.
Sir John Hicks looked at technical progress in terms of the effect of technical
change on the ratio of marginal product of capital to that of labour. If after the
technical change the ratio increases, in Hicks's terminology it is to be called
labour saving. If the ratio stays the same it is neutral and if the ratio falls, it is
called capital saving. We can now state the Hicksian classification of technical
progress in the following way: A technical progress will shift the per-worker
production function upward. This technical progress is said to be labour-saving
if at any given value of capital-labour ratio, the ratio of marginal product of
capital to the marginal product of labour has increased. Ifthis ratio decreases for
a given value ofcapital -labour ratio, the technical progress is said to be capital
saving, and if the ratio stays the same it is Hicks neutral.
Sir Roy Harrod put forward a classification of technical progress which was
different from Hicks's classification. He defined as neutral a technical change
one where the capital coefficient (capital-output ratio) does not change in the
presence of a constant interest rate. Broadly, he suggested that if, when the
interest rate is constant, the distribution of the total national product between
capital and labour stays constant, then it is neutral technical progress. If we
consider perfect competition and take interest rate as equal to the rental of
capital and hence equal to the marginal product of capital, then Harrod-neutral
technical progress is a statement about the relationship between capital-output
ratio and the marginal product of capital. Robert Solow's classification of
technical progress is
106
similar to Harrod's and Hicks’s classification except in one respect. Hicks's Determinants of
classification compares points on different per-worker output curves at points of Growth
constant capital-labour ratio and Harrod's scheme compares points on different
per-worker output curves at points of constant capital-output ratio. Solow's
classification compares points on old and new per-worker production at points at
which the labour-output ratio is constant. Thus Solow-neutrality is when at points
where L/Y is constant that is, the relative shares of capital and labour remain
constant. It can be shown that a Solow-neutral technical progress is capital
augmenting.
7.4 CONVERGENCE
In this section we take a look at whether the growth rates and income levels of
developing nations are converging to those of developed nations. The
convergence hypothesis claims that the poorer economies’ per capita incomes
tend to grow faster than those of richer countries. The convergence hypothesis is
also known as the ‘catching up’ hypothesis. The hypothesis is claimed on basis of
the structure and results of the Solow growth, which you studied in unit 5. In this
model, economic growth is driven by the accumulation of physical capital until
this optimum level of capital per worker, which is the "steady state", is reached,
where output, consumption and capital are constant. The model predicts more
rapid growth when the level of physical capital per capita is low; this is
sometimes referred to as “catch up” growth. As a result, all economies should
eventually converge in terms of per capita income. Let us view the facts from
history.
At the dawn of the industrial era, around the middle of the eighteenth century,
average real living standards in the richest countries were no more than about
three times as great as those of the poorest. However since the last two centuries,
a huge gap has emerged in the living standards as well as the rate of growth in
developed nations, and the developing nations. Today, the ratio of average real
living standards of the rich countries to that of the poor approaches 100 to 1.
Economist Lant Pritchett has called this phenomenon of the developed countries
as a whole enjoying a far higher rate of growth than developing nations over the
last two centuries as The Great Divergence.
The 2 centuries of exponential increase in productivity and incomes in early
industrialising countries, and comparative stagnation in most other countries, led
to the “Great Divergence.” Some countries experienced almost no gains during
this long period. Other countries were among those with the highest incomes
throughout this period. Much later, incomes in many other countries where a
majority of the world’s people live began to rise; and then to start closing the gap,
albeit often in fits and starts, and frustratingly slowly, by the turn of the twenty-
first century. Yet many people, particularly in the least-developed countries, still
have seen almost no improvements in living standards. Japan was the first non-
Western country to begin to catch up. China and India, where more than one-
third of the world’s people live, began a period of high growth rates and entered
the catch-up process by the early 1980s, (in the case of China) and early 1990s
(in the case of India).
107
Growth Models: How did the enormous change happen? And why did the benefits go for so long
Theory & Evidence only to people in a small part of the world? Why are some countries still making
little progress? And how have many countries finally started to reconverge, in
some cases dramatically? Initially, some of these riches were gained through the
process of colonialism. But as time went on, an increasing majority of the gains
resulted from the productivity advances of the Industrial Revolution.
About 250 years ago, the Industrial Revolution started in England. Production
rose through the progressive application of steam power, water power, and other
technical advances. Countries that industrialised early — in West Europe and
North America — began a transformation that would lead to unprecedented gains
in living standards. There emerged a huge difference in the level of technology
available in Europe and that in other parts of the world. Europe also saw rise in
commerce and trade, other than manufacturing. The process of divergence was
underway.
There was a decolonisation wave from the years after World War II to the
mid-1970s. There was a massive historical and geopolitical change. Yet for
decades following independence of many developing, formerly colonized
countries, several observers found it puzzling that most developing countries
made rather little progress on productivity and incomes.
If the growth experience of developing and developed countries was similar, there
are (at least) two important reasons to expect that developing countries would be
“catching up” by growing faster on average than developed countries. The first
reason is due to technology transfer. Many companies and governments actively
seek to absorb new technologies; in fact, development assistance often attempts to
facilitate this goal, particularly in fields such as public health. Today’s
developing countries do not have to “reinvent the wheel”. They do not need to go
through the process of technological evolution that today’s developed nation did.
This should enable developing countries to “leapfrog” over some of the earlier
stages of technological development, moving quickly to high-productivity
techniques of production. As a result, they should be able to grow much faster
than today’s developed countries are growing now or were able to grow in the
past, when they had to invent the technology as they went along and proceed step
by step through the historical stages of innovation. Economic historian Alexander
Gerschenkron called this process the advantage of backwardness. In fact, if we
confine our attention to cases of successful development, the later a country
begins its modern economic growth, the shorter the time needed to double output
per worker. For example, Britain doubled its output per person in the first 60
years of its industrial development, and the United States did so in 45 years.
South Korea once doubled per capita output in less than 12 years, and China has
done so in 8 years. The second reason to expect convergence if conditions are
similar is based on diminishing returns to factor accumulation. Today’s developed
countries have high levels of physical and human capital; in a production function
analysis, this would explain their high levels of output per person. But in
traditional neoclassical analysis, the marginal product of capital and the
profitability of investments would be lower in developed countries where capital
intensity is higher, provided that the law of diminishing returns applied. That is,
the impact of additional capital on output would be expected to be smaller in a
developed country that already had a lot of capital in relation to the size of its
workforce than in a developing country where capital was scarce.
108
As a result, we would expect higher investment rates in developing countries, Determinants of
either through domestic sources or through attracting foreign investment With Growth
higher investment rates, capital would grow more quickly in developing
countries until approximately equal levels of capital and (other things being
equal) output per worker were achieved. However, , in practice, this does not
always happen or happen quickly.
Given either or both of these conditions, technology transfer and more rapid
capital accumulation, incomes would tend toward convergence in the long run as
the faster-growing developing countries would be catching up with the slower-
growing developed countries. Although it is unlikely that incomes would
eventually turn out to be identical, they would at least tend to converge,
conditional upon that is accounting for any systematic differences in key
variables such as population growth rates and savings rates. As we have just seen,
the evidence shows that divergence occurred for two centuries from the start of
the industrial revolution. However, the most recent data demonstrate that, on
average, (re-)convergence is now underway.
The encouraging convergence trend is not inevitable. Potentially, the trend could
be reversed by new technological divides, climate change impacts in some areas,
policies that are bad or serve narrow interest groups, and disasters of widespread
armed conflict. Least-developed countries could remain stuck for other reasons.
Further, these trends in convergence reflect country averages – they do not adjust
for inequality or the presence of extreme poverty.
At the heart of the Solow model is the prediction of convergence, but
convergence is of more than one type. The strongest prediction is called
unconditional convergence. Suppose we postulate that nations, in the long run,
have no tendency to display differences in the rates of technical progress,
savings, population growth, and capital depreciation. In that case, the Solow
model predicts that in all nations, capital per unit of labour will converge to a
common value regardless of the initial state of each of these economies, as
measured by their starting levels of per capita income (or equivalently, their per
capita capital stock).
The exogenous parameters of the model are assumed to be equal, but the initial
level of the capital stock or per capita income is not. The claim of convergence is
then based on the Solow model: its content is that in the presence of similar
parameters governing the evolution of the economy, history in the sense of
different initial conditions does not matter.
Empirically, the assertion of unconditional convergence is even stronger. At the
back of our minds we base such convergence on certain assumptions regarding
the similarity of parameters across countries. However, there is no guarantee that
these assumptions hold in reality, so if we were to find convergence, it would be
a striking finding, not a trivial one.
109
Provided that all the parameters of the Solow model are constant across countries,
convergence across countries is an implication of that model. Consider the
obvious weak link in the prediction of unconditional convergence: the assumption
that across all countries, the level of technical knowledge (and its change), the rate
of savings, the rate of population growth, and the rate of depreciation are all the
same. This notion certainly flies in he face of the facts: countries differ in many,
if not all, these features. Although this has no effect on the Solow prediction that
countries must converge to their steady states, the steady states can now be
different from country to country, so that there is no need for two countries to
converge to each other. This weaker hypothesis leads to the notion of conditional
convergence.
In the literature on economic growth, the term ‘convergence” is sometimes used
in two senses. In the first sense, convergence is taken to mean a reduction in the
dispersion of levels of income among nations. This is called (sigma )
convergence. The other sense is called (beta) convergence. Beta convergence
means poor economies grow faster than richer countries. Conditional
convergence takes place when economies experience convergence, but
conditional on other variables being constant. Unconditional convergence is
said to occur when the growth rate of an economy declines as it approaches its
steady state.
Check Your Progress 1
1. Explain the meaning of growth accounting.
2. What do you understand by total factor productivity?
3. Explain Hicks-neutral and Harrod-neutral technical progress
4. Explain the concepts of:
(1) Unconditional and conditional convergence and
(2) Sigma and beta-convergence.
110
Determinants of
7.5 OTHER DETERMINANTS OF GROWTH
In the earlier sections, we have looked at some factors that determine growth, like
accumulation, improvements in total factor productivity, technology and
technological advance. Here we would like to look at some other factors. Some
factors like human capital were considered in unit 6 on endogenous growth
theory. Some other important factors like impact of international trade and finance
on growth will be taken up for discussion in the subsequent course on
development economics.
Most of the economic determinants of growth, like factors of production,
accumulation, technology, productivity growth, and so on, have been viewed by
some economists as proximate causes. However, these economic determinants
may themselves be influenced and impacted by underlying basic causes, some of
which may be non-economic. In this section we study some of these.
7.5.1 Institutions
In recent times institutional economics has assumed considerable importance in
the analysis of developing nations.. Recently, the analysis of exchange using tools
of microeconomics has been sought to be supplemented by institutional analysis.
Even in the study of economic growth, the study of institutions has assumed
importance. . We have studied several theories of growth. We saw recently there
has emerged a group of theories that see growth as determined by processes that
are endogenous. There are differences in factors and endowments among nations,
and this is supposed to explain the differences in economic growth of nations.
Some economists have suggested that the factors which are supposed to cause
economic growth, which are endogenous, are themselves not the causes of, or
explanations of growth. They are actually the characteristics or features of
growth. The main reason for differences in growth performance is differences in
the structure of institutions in various countries. Institutions and differences in
them can account for large differences in the performance of countries.
What are institutions? Douglass North, a Nobel Prize winner in economics defines
institutions by referring to them, as “the rules of the game in a society or, more
formally, are the humanly devised constraints that shape human interaction.” He
suggests that institutions shape the constraints in interactions among people.
These interactions may be economic, social or political. Economic institutions
such as property rights and the degree of perfection of markets influence the
structure of economic incentives in society. Economic institutions also determine
how efficiently allocations will be allocated in society. Thus it is important to
realise that not only are institutions important but also that they are endogenous.
One new strand in economic thought looks at changes in property rights and
transaction costs having a great impact on economic development. This view is
exemplified by the works of Ronald Coase and Douglass North. Another strand
has sought to use the recent developments in information economics, like
asymmetric information, imperfect information, moral hazard, adverse selection,
signalling and screening, to understand how institutions affect development. They
see institutions as filling in gaps in the economy created by missing and
incomplete markets, presence of risk, and asymmetry of information. They have
used this, for instance, to model agrarian institutions, for instance on these lines.
111
Growth Models: This is seen in works of economists like George Akerlof and Joseph Stiglitz.
Theory & Evidence Interestingly, all four economists have won the Nobel Prize.
The transaction costs school contends that as transaction costs change,
institutions emerge to minimise these transaction costs. This is the basis of
development. Transaction costs include costs of negotiation, monitoring,
coordination, and enforcement of contracts. When transaction costs are high,
allocation of property rights becomes crucial. Contracts come to be determined by
property relations when transaction costs are high. In the development process
there may emerge a trade-off between economies of scale and transaction costs.
In simple face to face interaction transaction costs may be low but production
costs are high because specialisation and division of labour is limited. The
transactions cost school also believes that changes in relative prices cause
institutional changes.
The information economics school cast their theories in more rigorous terms and
explicitly bring in notions of equilibrium. In addition, institutional quality affects
the amount and quality of investments in education and health, via the mediating
impact of inequality. In countries with higher levels of education, institutions
tend to be more democratic, with more constraints on elites. The causality
between education and institutions could run in either direction, or both could be
caused jointly by still other factors. It is important to understand why and how a
certain institution emerges, and what purpose it may be serving. Even an
institution that appears to be negative may be serving some purpose. It is
important to realise this to explain its persistence. The institution may not be
optimal, indeed, may be dysfunctional and may still persist. It is necessary to
observe if there are regularities in the evolution of institutions, as this gives rise to
conventions.
7.5.2 Geography
At first glance, geography seems to have had a major influence on development. It
is perhaps not a coincidence that many of the poorer nations are situated around
and near the Equator. Very hot climate saps the energy to work, so workers’
productivity is affected. Low productivity leads to low income, and many of low-
productivity workers may not be able to afford adequate amount of nutritious
food. Low nutrition levels can further diminish productivity.
Moreover, geography also influences economic development through the factor of
location. Geographical factors may lead to industries and factors to be located, or
not to be in productive regions. Similarly agriculture, urbanization and some
other aspects of the economy can also be affected by geographical condition.
Economists have started paying greater attention to geographical factors.. First,
in the very long run, very few economists doubt that physical geography,
including climate, has had an important impact on economic history. Geography
was once truly exogenous, even if human activity can now alter it, for better or
worse. But the economic role played by geography, such as tropical climate, today
is less clear. Some research suggests that when other factors, notably inequality
and institutions, are taken into account, physical geography adds little to our
understanding of current development levels. However, some evidence is mixed.
112
For example, there is some evidence of an independent impact of malaria and Determinants of
indications that, in some circumstances, landlocked status may be an impediment Growth
to economic growth. Indeed, a direct link from geography to development out
comes is argued by some economists,
7.5.3 Culture
Cultural factors may also matter in influencing the degree of emphasis on
education, postcolonial institutional quality, and the effectiveness of civil society,
though the precise roles of culture are not clearly established in relation to the
economic factors
The idea that culture is a determinant of national wealth is an old one.
Sociologist Max Weber had argued that the rise of a “Protestant ethic,” which
celebrated hard work and the acquisition of wealth, led to an explosion of
economic growth in northern Europe starting in the 16th century. More recently,
economists have pondered over whether the rapid growth of such countries as
Taiwan, Singapore, and South Korea can be explained by their adherence to
“Asian values,” a term coined by The Economist magazine in 1980. Despite these
examples, however, economists have generally not seen culture as a determinant
of development, contrary to anthropologists, sociologists, and historians.
Economists do not wish to analyse culture as it is hard to quantify.
If we have to show that culture is important for economic growth, we have to
show first that culture has potentially important aspects that vary among
countries and second, that these aspects of culture significantly impactt economic
outcomes. Both these things are difficult to show as culture is hard to measure.
Not only does culture have many different dimensions, but even when we restrict
ourselves to a single aspect of culture, we often lack any objective (much less
quantitative) measure and have to rely on the observers’ subjective assessments.
Similarly, in some cases there is direct evidence of culture’s economic effects,
whereas in other cases such effects can only be inferred.
We can just touch upon a few aspects of culture and how it influences economic
growth. Some individual aspects of culture: openness to new ideas, belief in the
value of hard work, saving for the future, and the degree to which people trust
one another. Some broader characterizations of culture could be social capital,
conventions and so on. These broader characterizations will be discussed on the
subsequent course on development economics. Let us discuss some individual
characteristics:
1. Openness to new ideas: Scholars who have examined the historical process
of economic growth have often stressed the importance of a society’s openness to
importing new ideas from abroad. Many of the technologies used in any particular
country were invented in other countries, so a country that more readily adopted
technologies from abroad would be more technologically advanced.
2. Hard work: Throughout human history, in every culture, almost all adults
have had to work to survive. But cultures have differed in their view of that work:
as a necessary evil or as an activity with an intrinsic value. We would expect that
in cultures where work was viewed as good in and of itself, people would work
harder and produce more output.
113
3. Saving rate: A country’s economic growth is strongly affected by its saving
rate. We also saw that there are large differences in saving rates among countries.
If cultural differences among countries affected their saving rates, then these
differences could in turn affect the level of economic growth.
4. Trust: Economic interactions often involve reliance on a person to keep his
word. Without trust, economic activity would be reduced to a crude level, and
huge resources would have to be devoted to making sure that people came through
on their promises. Society would lose the advantages gained by creating complex
organizations — for example, allowing people to specialize in specific tasks or
exploiting gains from trade. Obviously, a society in which one could not rely on
others to hold to their commitments would be poorer.
7.6 PATH DEPENDENCE
We have studied in an earlier section that one of the issues in economics of
development is whether nations converge to a common growth rates. Statements
about convergence tend to include propositions about parameters like investment De
and saving and their relationship with growth. We saw in the previous section that
institutions too have a profound impact on the development process. We can now
ask, is history itself important? What if a country’s history itself, coupled with
people’s expectations about the future, determines not only the institutional
framework but also the parameters of the growth process like saving and
investment? We are looking at the persistence of certain patterns over long periods
and asking why is such persistence present?
People often speak of ‘historical forces’. The question is, how do we take these
into account? One view is that the course of economic development is determined
to a considerable degree on the earlier choices that were made, the basic path that
was chosen. The development process is path dependent. Path Dependence theory
postulates that when we consider the performance of an economy, its position at a
certain point of time depends on the whole sequence of events. The whole path is
important. We need to look at the entire history of the process.
Some economists have put forward the suggestion that certain inferior outcomes
may have got locked-in by historical events. You have studied in the
microeconomics course that equilibrium is usually the result of economic agents
choosing actions and making decisions while acting rationally by maximizing
some objective function. Such equilibria are optimal. However, in reality some
inferior outcomes can sometimes emerge and, moreover, may persist. It is these
situations that path dependence theory addresses. The question it asks is Why do
these situations arise, and how? Moreover, why do they sometimes tend to
continue? Why do rational decision- makers who are supposed to make optimal
choices not take corrective measures? The interesting thing is that these inferior
outcomes emerge even when superior alternatives exist and are available.
One way how this works is through complementarities and network externalities.
We shall explain these concepts with some examples from technology. The
common typing keyboard layout in typewriters and computers usually has the
letters Q, W, E. R. T. Y.... on the top row and this is called a QWERTY-type
keyboard. Now, the earliest typewriters were mechanical gadgets where, when a
key was struck, a lever with the imprint of the letter would rise and strike the
typewriter ribbon that, because it contained the fluid or the ink, the letter would
form on the page. If 2 or 3 keys were hit with quick succession the lever would
114
jam. The QWERTY keyboard was designed in such a way as to minimise the
possibility of such jamming by placing the keys that were likely to be struck in
quick succession in terms of spelling of words of the English language were
placed far apart. Thus the QWERTY keyboard was designed to slow down speed.
An alternative keyboard design introduced in 1932 was realised to be better at
promoting speed when it was found that typists trained in the Dvorak system were
regularly beating typists trained in the QWERTY system at speed typing tests.
The question is, why do we then find the inefficient QWERTY-type layout in
most keyboards? The answer is that the QWERTY layout had a historical
advantage of emerging first. Given that firms and organisations hired typists
coming out of typing schools. Given that these typists were already trained in
QWERTY-type keyboard, any individual firm would have found it very costly to
invest in retraining its typists on the Dvorak system. There is now a clear
divergence between individual costs and social gains. This occurs in this case
because there are complementarities and network externalities. Externalities take
the special form of network externalities because of the complementarities. Let us
explain further what network externalities mean. You have already read in the
section of market failure what externalities are. Network externalities mean that
the cost or benefit of adopting a technology or product depends on how many
people already adopted the same technology or product. Say you plan to buy a
mobile phone, because among other uses, you think that sending and receiving
SMS messages would be very useful. But if only two or three other people whom
you know have a mobile, this feature is not going to be too useful. Surely, the
more of your friends and acquaintances already have a mobile, the more useful it
would be to you. This is an example of network externalities. This is very
important in Information and Communication Technology (ICT) like e-mail.
So, to come back to the QWERTY example, we find that complementarities and
network externalities create a situation where a suboptimal choice is made and it
tends to persist. The important thing to realise is that if we were to look at the
average cost (AC) curves (recall from your microeconomics course what these
look like) of the Dvorak system and the QWERTY system, we will find that the
Dvorak system, because it is more efficient, will have its curve downward sloping,
and everywhere below the AC curve of the QWERTY system, which would of
course be downward sloping because of scale economies. But for an individual
firm which wants to make a switch from QWERTY to Dvorak, the relevant costs
(in the two curves) to be compared are at different points corresponding to the
horizontal axis, which measures the number of units (typists trained). On the
QWERTY curve, the point is far too much to the right since QWERTY has been
around for a long time and many typists with QWERTY type training are there.
To switch to Dvorak system, we have to consider a point close to the origin on the
horizontal axis, because it will be first typist for the individual firm .so this point,
on the Dvorak curve will be too much to the left and be of higher average cost
than the QWERTY point.
Although some economists and historians of technology do not agree that the
QWERTY system is inefficient as compared to the Dvorak system, the basic idea
should be clear. There are other such examples. In the 1980s, the format for
videotapes chosen was the VHS although the Betamax system was demonstrably
superior In computer software, although other operating systems may be available,
and may even be superior or cheaper or both, because of complementarities and
network externalities, Windows operating system has become the standard.
Similarly in the case of microprocessors, although other chips like AMD and Determinants of
RISC chips are available, Intel chips have become the industry standard. The Growth
upshot of the discussion is that we find that because of complementarities and
network externalities, there may be multiple equilibria.
Which equilibrium gets chosen — and it may be the inferior one, depends on the
path chosen by history. When complementarities are present, there may occur
historical lock-ins. the same idea can be understood in terms of widespread
coordination failure where large-scale investment does not take place because
other complementary investments are not forthcoming. Because of coordination
failure, each investment is not made because other complementary investments
are not made. Investments would be made if each investor expects others to
invest. Coordination then depends on the expectations of investors. The problem
of coordination can be solved to a great extent if linkages can be created among
various sectors of such a developing economy
Check Your Progress 2
1. What are institutions? Discuss some ways in which institutions determine
economic growth.
2. How do geographical factors influence growth?
3. How do individual aspects of culture impact economic growth?
4. Explain the concepts of path dependence and historical lock-ins.
7. 6 LET US SUM UP
This unit was the last unit in this Block, which dealt with economic growth. The
first four units had focused on various theories and models of growth, while the
current one extended the discussion of the previous four units and sought to
identify the actual determinants of growth.
The unit began by discussing growth accounting. This allows us to break
economic growth down into the proportion that is caused by individual factors of
production like labour and capital, and the proportion that can be attributed to
technological growth. Proceeding ahead, you learnt about the nature of
technology. The unit explained what is meant by embodied and disembodied
technical progress. You were also acquainted with neutral and non-neutral
technical progress. The unit went on to discuss the idea of total factor
productivity, and how productivity is related to efficiency.
Following this, the unit discussed the very important concept called convergence.
In unit 2, you had learnt about development gap between rich countries and
developing nations. This unit examined whether the developing countries are
catching up with the rich ones. The unit explored the idea of whether faster rates
of growth of developing countries as compared to the developed ones will lead to
the convergence of growth rates. The unit discussed about the concept of relative
and absolute convergence..
Finally, the unit briefly discussed certain other determinants of growth. These are
largely non-economic in nature like institutions, geography, and culture,. The
unit suggested that these are often underlying factors that may influence
economic determinants of growth, and as such may be considered as indirect,
albeit underlying determinants of economic growth.
117
7.7 ANSWERS TO CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
EXERCISES
Check Your Progress 1
1. See section 7.2
2. See section 7.3
3. See section 7.3
4. See section 7.4
Check Your Progress 2
1. See sub-section 7.5.1
2. See sub-section 7.5.2
3. See sub-section 7.5.3
4. See Sub-section 7.6.4
118
BLOCK 3 INEQUALITY AND POVERTY
BLOCK 3 INTRODUCTION
The third block of the course is titled Inequality and Poverty. In the first block,
you had studied about the basic idea of what is meant by economic growth and
economic development and the relationship among them. Also you were
acquainted with comparisons among nations The second block familiarized you
with growth models and with the factors that determine growth. This third block
takes up the important issues of inequality and poverty.
The block has two units. The first unit, unit 8 is titled Inequality. The unit
discusses about the concept of inequality, various axioms related to inequality,
and various ways to measure inequality. The title of the next unit, unit 9 is
Poverty. Like the previous unit did about inequality, this unit, too deals with the
concept , measurement and some other issues, but with regard to poverty in this
case.
UNIT 8 INEQUALITY
Inequality
Structure
8.0 Objectives
8.1 Introduction
8.2 Concept of Inequality
8.2.1 Economic Inequality
8.3 Axioms of Inequality
8.4. Measures of Inequality
8.4.1 Personal Distribution
8.4.2 Functional Distribution
8.5 Inequality and Development
8.5.1 Kuznets' Inverted-U Hypothesis
8.5.2 Gary S. Fields' Prediction
8.6 Let Us Sum Up
8.7 Answers/Hints to Check Your Progress Exercises
8.0 OBJECTIVES
After going through this Unit, you should be in a position to:
Explain the concept of inequality;
Identify the axioms of inequality;
Discuss the measures of inequality;
Critically examine the measures of inequality; and
Explain the relationship between economic growth and inequality
8.1 INTRODUCTION
Distribution of income in a country has always been an important topic of debate
in all the nations. Economic growth in a country indicates country’s development
but this is not a sufficient indicator of development. If the economic growth
distributes the income in a country more unequally, then there is a role of the
government to try and mend it in a manner that the distribution is more equal than
unequal. We begin with understanding the concept of inequality, in particular the
economic inequality. Afterwards, the axioms which need to be met by the
appropriate inequality index are discussed. There are various indexes which
measure the inequality, some of them are explained. Finally, we discussed the
relation of economic growth and inequality.
Line of equal
Cumulative % of Income
distribution
Country B
Country A
0
Cumulative % of Population 100
We can observe that the Lorenz curve possesses the principles of anonymity,
population, and relative income, because the curve does not utilise any
information on income or population magnitudes but only retains information
about income and population shares. But there are two problems with it. Mostly
the researchers of policy makers need to look at inequality in the form of a
number because that is more concrete and quantifiable as compared to a graph.
Also, any kind of inequality rankings cannot be provided by the Lorenz curves if
they cross.This means that an inequality measure that provides us with a number
for the income distribution would be perceived as a complete ranking of income
distributions. It would mean that in some situations, inequality measures tend to
disagree with one another.
2) Quintile Distribution
There is away to somewhat handle the non-numerical part of Lorenz curve. The
same underlying information on distribution can be presented in a numerical
format. World Bank favours the idea of arraying the income distribution by
population quintiles (20per cent of the population). For example, the poorest 20
per cent of India's population earns 8 per cent of the total income or the richest
quintile earns 41.4 per cent and so on. When comparing two countries, if one has
greater percentage share of income accruing in at least one quintile below the
highest and is at least equal in the other three below the highest, the country is
said to have 'Lorenz dominance', or to 'Lorenz dominate' the other country.
3) The range
It is a very simple measure to calculate. First, we find out the difference in the
incomes of the richest and the poorest individuals. This difference is then divided
by the mean to remove the dependence on the units in which income is measured.
This is a rather crude measure. It pays no attention to people between the richest
and the poorest on the income scale. From the perspective of the axiomatic
approach, it fails to satisfy the Dalton principle.
125
Let us see this with the help of an example. Suppose a small transfer from the
second poorest goes to the second most rich individual. This transfer will keep
the range measure unchanged. Ideally the regressive transfer should lead to a fall
in the inequality index/measure. But we can use the range if the detailed
information on income distribution is missing. It proves to be quite useful.
4) The Kuznets ratios
In his pioneering study, Simon Kuznets introduced developed these ratios of
income distributions in developed and developing countries. These ratios are
basically one step advanced than the quintile distribution. These ratios refer to the
share of income owned by the poorest x% of the population divided by the richest
y% of the population, where x and y stand for numbers such as 10, 20, or 40. If
the ratio is high, it means society is more equal. These ratios come in handy in
situations where detailed income distribution data are missing.
5) The mean absolute deviation
This is the measure that takes advantage of the entire income distribution. It has a
simple idea behind it i.e., inequality is proportional to distance from the mean
income. Hence, we take all income distances from the average income (mean
income), and add them up. Then divide the addition by total income to present
the average deviation. This average deviation will be a fraction of total income.
It is useful to express the deviation in terms of an absolute deviation denoted by
M as the absolute value ignore sthe negative signs. It looks a promising measure
as it takes into account the overall income distribution but it has one drawback: it
is often insensitive to the Dalton principle. Let us see how. Assume there are two
people with the incomes A and B. A is below the mean income of the population
and B is above the mean income of the population which means A < B. If a
regressive transfer (a transfer from poor to rich) takes place, then the inequality
measured by M will rise because the distance of both A and B will go up. Till
now the inequality measure is faring well. Now let us take another case. We take
any two incomes A and B but this time they both are above the mean income of
the population. Again, the regressive transfer takes place from A to B. Let us say
the transfer was small enough so that after the transfer also both the income
levels A and B are above the mean income. There will be no difference in the
sum of the absolute difference from mean income. So, the mean absolute
deviation will not register any change in such a case, and hence the Dalton
principle fails. The Dalton principle is meant to apply to all regressive transfers,
not just those from incomes below the mean to incomes above the mean.
6) Coefficient of Variation
Coefficient of variation (CV) is a relative measure of dispersion of data points
around the mean. It is measured asfollows:
CV = X 100
If we want the measure in the form of decimal then we remove the multiplication
of coefficient by 100. The multiplication by 100 provides us with is the
percentage. This measure require that the income is normally distributed.
Coefficient of variation presents the extent of deviation from the normal
distribution of income. Larger the coefficient of variation, greater will be
inequality in the distribution of income and vice versa.
7) Gini Coefficient Inequality
This measure of inequality is widely used and is a measure of the relative degree
of income inequality in a country. The Gini approach starts from a fundamentally
different base. Instead of taking deviations from the mean income, it takes the
difference between all pairs of incomes and simply totals the (absolute)
differences. It is as if inequality is the sum of all pairwise comparisons of “two-
person inequalities” that can possibly be made. It can be obtained by calculating
the ratio of the area between the line of equal distribution (diagonal 45º line) and
the Lorenz curve divided by the total area of the half-square in which the curve
lies. In Figure 8.2, this is the ratio of the shaded area to the total area of the
triangle BCD, i.e.,
Gini coefficient =
A D
Line of equal
Cumulative % of Income
distribution
Lorenz Curve
B C
Cumulative % of Population
Fig. 8.2 Gini Coefficient
This ratio is known as the Gini Concentration Ratio or the Gini Coefficient, after
the Italian statistician C. Gini, who first formulated it in 1921. It very closely
related to the Lorenz curve Recall that the more “bowed out” the Lorenz curve,
the higher is our intuitive perception of inequality. It turns out that the Gini
coefficient is precisely the ratio of the area between the Lorenz curve and the 45°
line of equal distribution, to the area of the triangle below the 45° line.Gini
coefficients are aggregate inequality measures which can vary from 0 (perfect
equality) to 1 (perfect inequality). It is generally found that if the Gini coefficient
lies between 0.5 and 0.7, then the distribution is a highly unequal distribution.
And if the Gini coefficient is in the range of 0.2 to 0.5, then those countries have
relatively equitable distribution. The Gini coefficient meets all four principles
and is therefore Lorenz-consistent, just like the coefficient of variation.
8.4.2 Functional Distribution
The functional distribution or factor share distribution represents the percentage
of income received by one factor of production in comparison to the income
received by other 3 factors of production. In particular it’s the share of labour
127
in total income compared to the share of total income received in the form of Inequality
rent, interest and profits. The significance of this measure is that it attempts to
explain the income of a factor input in terms of the contribution the factor makes
to the total output. The unit prices of each factor of production are reached at
with the help of supply and demand curves. Each factor market has it own market
where its supplied and demanded. At the equilibrium in these factor markets we
receive the equilibrium prices and quantities of these factors. Factors receives
their rewards on the basis of their function. The drawback of this approach is that
it fails to consider the role and influence of non-market forces on the factors of
production. Non-market forces are those which influence the equilibrium of the
market but not directly like the bargaining power of the trade unions which affect
the wage rate, power of monopolists who manipulate the prices of capital or land.
Fig.8.3Kuznets’ Curve
129
Inequality and Kuznets says that the widening of income inequality in initial stages of growth is
Poverty due to the structural changes an economy goes through as the growth takes place.
The urban sector receives more weight during that time so the economic activity
takes place in favour of the urban sector characterised by higher productivity. But
in the later stages of economic growth, the relation reverses. As a country
industrialises, the center of the economy shifts from rural areas to the cities as
rural laborers, such as farmers, begin to migrate seeking better-paying jobs.Due
to the influx of rural migrants to the urban areas, the rate of growth in urban
labour becomes high. When the rate of expansion in the urban-high productivity
sector is higher than the increase in the rate of growth of the urban labour force,
the income differentials will reduce as the population in rural areas fall. But this
stage may never be achieved by the nations which experience high rate of
population growth. Early evidence suggests that developing countries appear to
have higher inequality, on average, than their developed counterparts.
But today, the world looks very different than it did in 1955 when Kuznets
proposed the inverted U relationship. In the past decades, economic inequality in
the United States and other wealthy/developed nations has risen sharply which
has induced a renewed the quest to know how the changes in income
distributions affect economic wellbeing. Over the same time period, economic
inequality has persisted and even grown in many poorer economies.
8.5.2 Gary S. Fields's Prediction
Gary S. Fields has offered predictions about how the inequality will behave as
the economic growth takes place. He found the Lorenz curves very relevant and
has used them for his predictions. He discusses three different situations:1)
traditional-sector enrichment growth typology; 2) modern-sector enrichment
growth typology, and 3)modern-sector enlargement growth.
1) Traditional-Sector Enrichment Growth Typology
As the name suggests, the traditional sector workers receive the benefits of
growth, while there is little or no growth taking place in the modern sector. This
kind of pattern will be noticed in those countries which have low incomes as well
as low growth rates and choose to work towards reduction of absolute poverty.
This kind of growth leads to higher-income and hence a more equal relative
distribution of income as well asless poverty. Diagrammatically, it means that the
Lorenz Curve shifts uniformly upward. This new shifted curve will be closerto
the line of equality as shown in Figure 8.4.
2) Modern-sector Enrichment Growth Typology
This kind of growth limits its benefits to the people who are engaged in the
modern sector. The wages and number of workers in the traditional sector
remains more or less constant.It is easy to foresee that this kind of growth results
in higher income only for those who are associated with the modern sector and
that leads to a less equal relative distribution of income andnearly no change in
poverty. Diagrammatically, this growth moves the Lorenz curve
uniformlyoutward and further from theline of equality as shown in Figure 8.5.
130
Inequality
10 10
% of Income
% of Income
0 % of Income Recipients 0 % of Income Recipients
10 10
131
Inequality and
Poverty 100
% of Income L1
L2
0
% of Income Recipients 100
133
UNIT 9 UNDERSTANDING POVERTY
Structure
9.0 Objectives
9.1 Introduction
9.2 Concept and Meaning of Poverty
9.3 Types of Poverty
9.4 Poverty Line
9.5 India’s Poverty Line Estimation
9.6 Poverty Alleviation Programmes in India
9.7 Let Us Sum Up
9.8 Answers/Hints to Check Your Progress Exercises
9.0 OBJECTIVES
After going through this Unit, you should be in a position to:
Explain the concept of poverty and its various dimensions;
Identify the characteristics of poor ;
Discuss the poverty line (national and international);
Critically explain the recommendations made by various poverty expert
groups ;
List a few poverty alleviation programmes in India
9.1 INTRODUCTION
In the year 2000, the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted a set of
Millennium Development Goals which contains eight such goals. The first one
itself is to eradicate extreme poverty and hunger. This indicates that poverty
reduction is the prerequisite for any country which wants to provide its citizens
with good quality of life. In this unit, we first discuss the concept of poverty. This
Unit begins with explaining the various approaches to the concept of poverty and
its types. Various correlates of poverty and characteristics that are widely shared
by poor individuals are explained. Further the concept of poverty line has been
discussed followed by the progression of India’s Poverty Line estimation. A
critical view has been taken up in order to provide you the complete picture of
the recommendations of various committees which were constituted for the task
of poverty estimation in our country. The unit concludes by discussing the main
poverty alleviation programme of India: Integrated Rural Development
Programme.
Dr. Nidhi Tewathia, Assistant Professor, School of Social Siences, IGNOU
Inequality and
Poverty
9.2 CONCEPT AND MEANING OF POVRTY
We always welcome the economic growth that spreads its benefits equitably
among the population. If the growth is distributed unequally then it needs to be
assessedin terms of equity. First, there exists an inequality of world income
distribution and then there is the inequality of income distribution within a
country. If a country is under developed then the most visible characteristic of
that country will be the existence of poverty. It is not easy to describe poverty
and its related dimensions (illiteracy, hunger, ill health, capability deprivation),
head on. Poverty is like a threat to the existence of individuals who are poor. It
destroys the aspirations, hopes and potential joy of good health and nutrition.
Poverty also indicates the absence of productive asset holdings, like possession
of land. Hence, the basic implication of poverty is that the poor will lack access
to markets, particularly the markets for credit, insurance, land, and labour. The
absence of collateral restricts their access to credit markets. This leads the
individual to the Poverty Trap. This trap makes it very difficult for a poor
individual to escape poverty as some amount of capital possession is required in
order to escape. Low wages, low work opportunities, inability to pay for
education are all causes of poverty trap. Poverty trap is a spiral which forces
people to remain poor.
Poverty as a concept is of high significance, both intrinsic and functional.
Further, it holds importance from the policy making view as well. It is a common
knowledge that a fundamental goal of economic development and of all
governments is the removal of poverty. Hence, the characteristics of the poor
need to be understood well. That helps in structuring the appropriate measure of
poverty by the policy makers. Poverty is also an outcome of economic
development which needs to be dealt with through various policies.
One view of looking at the concept of poverty is in relation to economic growth.
As a result of economic growth, the average consumption and average income
rise. It impacts poverty as the distribution of income and consumption will
change. If everyone’s income increases then we can say that the poverty reduces.
But if the economic growth only increases the incomes of the rich (still meaning
that the average income is increasing), no reduction in poverty will take place. In
fact, the distribution of income widens.
Another perspective to look at the concept of poverty is through the work of
Amartya Sen. His work is based on the relation of poverty with capability
deprivation. Individuals are deprived of capability building if they are poor. For
example, poverty denies the opportunity to gatherthe school experience which
would lead to yet another type of poverty. Such individuals will not beable to
read and write. That means they will not be able to participate in the activities
which need literacy. Only those individuals who are literate will be able to
capture the benefits of those opportunities. It is also important to look at poverty
as per the society/economy where the individual lives. Individuals are also poor if
they lack resources to participate in the society where they live, even if they have
136
enough incomes to lead their life nicely in some other society. But poverty is not Poverty
only the inadequacy of income, its domain is much wider. Poverty not only
includes not having enough income to guarantee adequate food, clothes, or
shelter, but also being unhealthy, as well as being denied access to education,
political participation in the society.International institutions like the World Bank
and the United Nations go beyond the measurement of the number of people
whose income is low. They, in addition,give importance to health, such as infant
and child mortality rates and the life expectancy, and to participation in
education. This means that the poor people in the world are poorer, and rich
people are richer because income is positively related with the above-mentioned
aspects of well-being. So, we can say that the Africans, in addition of having less
money have lower life expectancy and low level of educationas compared to
Europeans and Americans. If we look at a within country scenario, same holds.
Within acountry, poorer people are more likely to be malnourished and
unhealthy, to lose their babies and to have low life expectancy. This within
country scenario is true for both the rich countries of Europe as well as the poor
countries of Asia and Africa. Hence, to gain a wider view of poverty, a more
complete picture of deprivation and inequality should be considered.
138
of the poverty line in a given society. We can say that the poverty line is an Poverty
indicator of the minimum level of economic participation in a given society at a
particular time. The minimum wage in a given country is a legally decreed
estimate of a poverty line.
Link between hunger and poverty is strong. Many countries have nutrition-based
poverty lines. United States estimates poverty line based on food requirements. In
India, the poverty line estimate is based on the food expenditure necessary to
afford the minimum consumption of calories.It is a tradition to set the poverty
line as per the cost of a particular standard of living given a country. A major
component of poor’s income gets spent on the food requirements. So, if they do
not have enough money, it would mean like sleeping without sufficient food.The
general norm which many countries follow when they estimate the poverty line,
is by looking at a calorie norm of around 2000 calories a day. But this estimate is
gender and work sensitive. As agricultural labour works physically harder, so in
that case the calorie norm is revised upwards. Similarly, separate standards are
employed for men, women and children.The association of food and poverty
looks like an attractive one.Not only because poor people spend majority of their
budget on food, but also because this association gets more support politically for
the antipoverty programs which involve food as compared to the programs based
on goods which are seen as less admirable. The right to food is more convincing
than the right to other consumer goods.
Over the time, the basic concept of poverty line has remained the same but the
line is revised incorporating the inflation levels. Using the data for the year 2005,
the World Bank estimated the International Poverty Line (IPL), a global absolute
minimum, at the $1.25 per day figure. It was updated in the year 2008 to $1.25 a
day at 2005 purchasing-power parity (PPP). It was mainly revised due to
inflation. Further, in 2015, the World Bank updated the IPL to $1.90 per day.As
per the World Bank, in 2017, an estimated 9.2 percent of the global population
still lived below the international poverty line of $1.90 a day, which is based on
poverty lines in some of the poorest economies in the world. The COVID-19
pandemic has reversed the gains in global poverty for the first time in a
generation. About 120 million additional people are living in poverty as a result
of the pandemic (April 2021).
It is also important for us to realise that the concept of poverty line always uses
approximations and proxies. The threshold thus arrived at is fuzzy in nature. The
year after year deprivation shows its cumulative effect in later years. There are
some other issues with the concept of poverty at the fundamental level, e.g.,
should income or item-by-item expenditure be used to identify the poor, are
notions of the poverty line “absolute” or “relative,” is poverty temporary or
chronic, should we study households or individuals as the basic unit, and so on.
139
Inequality and
Poverty
9.5 INDIA’S POVERTY LINE ESTIMATION
This section provides the progression Poverty Estimation in India, post-
Independence. The Planning Commission constituted various expert groups time
to time to estimate the number of people living in poverty in India.
1. Working Group (1962): For the first time, the poverty line in India was
quantified in 1962 in terms of a minimum requirement which included
food and non-food items, for individuals in order to lead a healthy life.
This Group formulated rural and urban poverty lines at 20 and 25 per
capita per month respectively (in terms of 1960-61 prices). The Group did
not consider any regional variation while formulating these lines. This
poverty line also excluded expenditure on health and education as it was
assumed to be taken care of by the state. So, in 1960s and 1970s these
poverty lines were used to find out the state of poverty at national and
state level.
4. Lakdawala Expert Group (1993): Until the 1990s, no attempt was made
to consider differences in prices or differences in consumption patterns
across states or over time, w.th respect to poverty lines estimation.
Poverty estimates were revised with each quinquennial NSS survey. Price
indices were used to adjust for price changes over time. This
methodology for estimating poverty was considered inappropriate by
140
some, in giving a representative picture of the incidence of poverty in the Poverty
country. So, in 1989, The Planning Commission constituted the
Lakdawala Expert Group with a particular reason of looking into the
methodology for estimation of poverty and to re-define the poverty line, if
needed. The Expert Group did not redefine the poverty line and
recommended to carry on with the separate rural and urban poverty lines
based on minimum nutritional requirements. But the Expert Group
disaggregated these poverty lines into state-specific poverty lines in order
to reflect the inter-state price differentials. It suggested that the poverty
lines should be updated using the Consumer Price Index of Industrial
Workers (CPI-IW) in urban areas and Consumer Price Index of
Agricultural Labour (CPI-AL) in rural areas rather than using National
Accounts Statistics. These recommendations were taken up by the
Planning Commission. The Commission adopted the practice of
calculating poverty levels in rural and urban areas in the states using
state-specific poverty lines together with the national estimates from 1997
to 2004-05. But over the years, this method lost the credibility. There
were many flaws in the price data. Hence, the successive poverty lines
failed to preserve the original calorie norms.
5. Tendulkar Expert Group (2009): To review the methodology used for
poverty estimation, in 2005, another expert group chaired by Suresh
Tendulkar was constituted. Mainly, it was constituted to address the three
key shortcomings of the previous methods: (i) Poverty estimates based on
the 1973-74 poverty line baskets (PLBs) of goods and services did not
reflect significant changes in consumption patterns of poor over time; (ii)
Issues with the adjustment of prices for inflation, across regions and
across time; and (iii) the assumption that only the state will provide for
health and education. The Tendulkar Committee suggested a shift from
calorie-based norms to target nutritional outcomes for poverty estimation
and poverty lines. Further, the committee recommended a uniform all-
India urban PLB across rural and urban India instead of two separate
PLBs for rural and urban poverty lines. It also recommended to
incorporate private expenditure on health and education in order to
estimate poverty. The monthly household consumption expenditure was
broken up into per person per day consumption, which resulted in the
figure of Rs 32 and Rs 26 a day for urban and rural areas. The national
poverty line for 2011-12 was estimated at Rs. 816 per capita per month
for rural areas and Rs. 1,000 per capita per month for urban areas.
6. Rangarajan Committee (2014): The Tendulkar committee made the urban
poverty line of 2004-05 the new national poverty line on the grounds that
it was “less controversial” than the current rural poverty line and it
fulfilled the requirement of statistical consistency over time. This
increased the number of rural poor.This new poverty line was also
justified on the grounds that it also provided for minimum nutritional,
141
Inequality and health and educational outcomes. These justifications were not enough to
Poverty
stand up to the scrutiny. Due to such criticism as well as due to changing
times and aspirations of people of India, Rangarajan Committee was set
up in 2012. This Committee submitted its report in June 2014. It again
started the previous practice of having separate all-India rural and urban
poverty line baskets and deriving state-level rural and urban estimates
from these. Also, it recommended separate consumption baskets for rural
and urban areas which include food items that ensure recommended
calorie, protein & fat intake and non-food items like clothing, education,
health, housing and transport. This committee raised the daily per capita
expenditure to Rs 47 for urban and Rs 32 for rural from Rs 32 and Rs 26
respectively at 2011-12 prices. Monthly per capita consumption
expenditure of Rs. 972 in rural areas and Rs. 1407 in urban areas is
recommended as the poverty line at the all-India level. The government
did not take a call on the report of the Rangarajan Committee. Rangarajan
committee missed the opportunity to go beyond the expenditure-based
poverty rates and examine the possibility of a wider multi-dimensional
view of deprivation.
Some states such as Odisha and West Bengal supported the Tendulkar Poverty
Line while others such as Delhi, Jharkhand, Mizoram etc. supported Rangarajan
report. The current official measures of poverty are based on the Tendulkar
poverty line. They are fixed at daily expenditure of 27.2 in rural areas and
33.3 in urban areas and are criticised by many for being too low.
7) Task Force by Niti Ayog (2015): The Task Force deliberated the issue of
whether a Poverty Line is required. The report of the Task Force was submitted
in July, 2016. The task force suggested four options for tracking the poor: i)
Continue with the Tendulkar poverty line; ii) Switch to the Rangarajan or other
higher rural and urban poverty lines; iii) Track progress of the bottom 30% of the
population; iv) Track progress along specific components of material poverty
such as nutrition, housing, drinking water, sanitation, electricity and connectivity.
The advantage of the level of expenditure as an indicator of poverty is that it is
directly observable and it closely correlates with poverty along different
dimensions. So, while there are additional complementary approaches to tracking
poverty, none of them can substitute the poverty line-based approach.
142
programmes, food security programmes, social security programmes, skill India Poverty
programmes. A brief list of such programmes is as follows:
Jawahar Gram Samridhi Yojana
National Old Age Pension Scheme
National Family Benefit Scheme
Annapurna Scheme
Pradhan Mantri Gramin Awaas Yojana
Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act
(MGNAREGA)
Apart from these, a major programme started by India to alleviate rural poverty
is Integrated Rural Development Programme (IRDP). It aims to alleviate rural
poverty by providing income-generated assets to the poorest of the poor. This
programme started in 1978-79. Its main aim is to identify the families which are
below the poverty line and raise them by creating sustainable self-employment
opportunities in the rural areas. Such families are provided with term credit by
commercial banks, cooperatives and regional rural banks. The programme
gathers 50% funds from the centre and the remaining 50% from the states. The
target group are the individuals who earn less than 11,000 (as defined by the
Eighth Five-year plan). To make the programme well targeted, it has stipulated
well defined proportions for the scheduled caste families, scheduled tribe
families, women and physically challenged persons among the total assisted
people/families. Ministry of Rural Areas and Employment is responsible for the
release of central share of funds, policy formation, overall guidance,
monitoring, and evaluation of the program.
Check Your Progress 2
1) Explain the concept of Poverty Line.
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
2) Discuss the progression of the International Poverty Line.
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
143
Inequality and 3) What were the recommendations of The Tendulkar Committee and how
Poverty
are they different from the recommendations made by the Rangarajan
Committee?
4) Why was the Tendulkar committee criticised for their recommendations?
5) Enlist a few Poverty alleviation programmes of India?
144
BLOCK 4 POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS AND
FUNCTIONING OF THE STATE
BLOCK 4 INTRODUCTION
The final block of the course is titled Political Institutions and Functioning of
the State. In the first block, you had studied about the basic idea of what is
meant by economic growth and economic development and the relationship
among them. Also you were acquainted with comparisons among nations. The
second block familiarized you with growth models and with the factors that
determine growth. The third block discussed the important issues of inequality
and poverty.
The present block has three units. The first unit of the block, unit 10, is titled
Institutions and Evolution of Democracy. The unit discusses alternative
institutional trajectories and their relationship with economic performance. The
unit also discusses within-country differences in the functioning of the State
institutions and the relationship between democracy and development. The title
of the next unit, unit 11 is Theories of Regulation. This unit discusses the
concept of economic regulation and examines the arguments for regulation. It
also describes two broad theories that explain and discuss economic regulation.
Finally the unit shows how sometimes the economic organizations or firms that
are being regulated, themselves capture the regulatory process and get benefits
from the regulation process. The final unit of the block, which is the final unit of
this course, unit 12 is titled Government Failure and Corruption. The unit
examines the role of state in the economy, particularly the economy of a
developing nation, in response to market failure, and also to perform certain roles
that may be particularly required for developing nations. The unit also discusses
how in certain situations the government may ‘fail’ in terms of creating outcomes
where economic efficiency is reduced. Finally the unit discusses a problem that
plagues the institutional and government functioning in several developing
nations, namely, corruption.
147
UNIT 10 INSTITUTIONS AND DEMOCRACY
Poltical Institutions
and the Functioing of
the State
Structure
10.0 Objectives
10.1 Introduction
10.2 Institutions and Evolution of Democracy
10.3 Alternative Institutional Trajectories
10.3.1 External Government Institution
10.3.2 Private Property Rights
10.3.3 Community Institution
10.0 OBJECTIVES
After going through this Unit, you should be able to:
Explain the evolution of institutions and democracy;
Discuss the alternative institutional trajectories;
Identify the pre-requisites of a sound institution;
Discuss the functions of an institution; and
Explain the role of institutions in economic growth of a country
10.1 INTRODUCTION
The institutional infrastructure is not constructed overnight. It is a far complex
task. It remains in formal and informal manner in a given society. The culture
and the moral fibre of the individuals influence the outcome of an institution in a
country. We begin this unit by explaining the situations which demand the
existence of an institution, the need for institutions and how individuals and an
institution are related. Afterwards, we learn about the alternative institutional
trajectories in terms of state institutions, private property rights and community-
based institutions. To understand about an institution, it is imperative to learn
about the objectives, functions or pre-requisites for a sound institution. In the
Shri Saugato Sen Associate Professor of Economics, IGNOU, New Delhi
148
latter half of the unit we discuss the relationship of institutions and economic Institution and
Democracy
development of a country with brief reference to the reforms in India.
The institutions which we discuss in this unit are based on more than one
principle of democracy mentioned above.
151
Poltical Institutions 10.3.2 Private Property Rights
and the Functioing of
the State The other group of policy analysts is also influenced with the same three models
we discussed earlier but they believe in clearly defining the private property
rights over the resources owned in common by all.The group suggests that the
central authority should give out ownership rights to the resource first and then
allow individuals to pursue their own self-interests within a set of well-defined
property rights. They say that the establishment of full property rights is
necessary to avoid the inefficiency of overuse of the commons. If one has right
over the resource then the buying/selling of the resource will take place as per the
terms prevailing in the market. The prices will be reached at by the forces of
demand and supply of that resource. But it is common knowledge that the
markets for private goods also do not function efficiently at times. The
equilibrium prices at times do not signal the true scarcity of the resource. Welfare
loss may occur for some while some may benefit. Moreover, there is no one rule
in order to decide who gets the property rights.
Human has been observed to affect natural resources of a nation and human
institutions affect the resilience of the environment. Locally evolved institutional
arrangements governed by stable communities and buffered from outside forces
have sustained resources successfully for centuries. Such community-based
institutions often fail as well when rapid change occurs. It is difficult to manage
the ideal conditions which are needed for successful governance. Significant
problems exist like trans-boundary pollution, tropical deforestation, and climate
change. These problems are at larger scale and local communities are not
successful in addressing them. A major challenge faced by the policy makers is
in terms of developing theories about human organisation which should be able
to deal with variety of situations (like tragedy of commons) and assess the human
capabilities and limitations on a realistic scale.
152
There is one similarity in the views of both centralization advocates and Institution and
Democracy
privatization advocates. They both accept that institutional change must come
from outside and be imposed on the individuals affected. Despite the common
view on the relevance of existence of the central authority, the institutional
changes they recommend could hardly be unrelated. Let us see how. If we look at
a competitive market which is made up of private institutions/players, we notice
that any individual producer can enter or exit the market at any time without
thinking about the cost of the existence of that market or of maintaining the
market, because the market simply exists for that producer. In a manner this
competitive market is like a public good. Any given market needs the support of
the public institutions in order to exist. In reality, the public and private
institutions are inter-dependent and do not exist in isolation.
Check Your Progress 1
1) List the four liberal principles of Democracy.
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
2) Explain the concept of tragedy of commons and the Prisoners’ dilemma.
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
3) List any four factors which should be considered while devising an
institution.
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
4) Discuss any two institutional trajectories.
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
153
Poltical Institutions 5) What alternative has been suggested by Hobbes to solve the commons
and the Functioing of
the State dilemma?
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
154
1. Dealing with conflict:It is very common to observe conflicts due to the Institution and
difference in power and values among different interested parties, in the Democracy
matters related toenvironmental choices. Dealing with such conflicts is as
important as the concern about resource itself. Conflict resolution is a
major motivation for designing resource institutions.
The effects of institutions in India can also be separated at the level of the states.
The formal reforms of 1991 at the centre were appreciated and received a lot of
publicity. What was less noticed was the growing decentralization of policy. For
a long time, we observed the dominancy of Congress party over the politics and
institutions of the country. But, with its dispersion came the scattering of the
political power which createdthe centrifugal forces that led to decentralization of
economic power and hence policy. Greater economic decentralization meant
states could differentiate themselves. States differ in their ability to attract private
sector investment, which is a significant factor in terms of economic performance
of the states. This decentralisation process was further strengthened by the
gradual dismantling of the industrial licensing system. When the centre was
deciding where and how much electricity capacity to install, there was little that
the states could have done to enhance their economic performance. In the pre-
1980s era centre was the deciding authority. Existing research informs that when
we relate state-level growth to state-level institutions we find that the latter have
no role in explaining growth prior to 1980 but a robust role in explaining post-
158
1980s, especially post- 1990s growth. Hence, the economic decentralization Institution and
Democracy
became important and states’ economic performance was closely tied to state-
level institutions in the post-1980s period.
The core market-creating public institutions were created during the India’s pre-
independence era. These institutions are taken as a key to India’s long-run growth
but they may not have kept pace with Indian economic veracities. India’s
institutions have shown the signs of weakness in terms of being slow to adapt or
change. This may sputter country’s growth engine. Sustaining growth is more
difficult than igniting it, and requires more extensive institutional reform. Growth
spurts are associated with just a narrow range of policy reforms.
The policy reforms which are related to growth transitions need to have elements
of both orthodoxy with unorthodox institutional practices.
Check Your Progress 2
1) Enlist any three factors which make it easier to organise the collective
action.
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
2) Discuss any three main challenges of governance.
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
3) Explain the relationship of institutions with the economic performance of a
nation.
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
4) Discuss India’s institutional trajectory in brief.
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
159
Poltical Institutions
and the Functioing of
10.6 LET US SUM UP
the State
Institutions are the rules which help us play the game of management. The
primary function of any institution is to deal with common resources in a manner
that the outcome is socially efficient. We began the unit by understanding the
need of institutions and policies. The rational individual may not lead to
optimality when it concerns the commons available for the whole population or
where the property rights are not clearly defined. Destruction of resources is a
major concern for all the nations. Three models (Tragedy of commons, Prisoners’
dilemma and the logic of collective action) provide us the base to understand the
requirement of institutions. The alternatives available are state-led institutions
(formal or informal) or the community-based local institutions which have been
mostly successful in the management of the common resources. We then moved
on to find out how the economic performance of any nation is not only dependent
on its resource endowments but also on the type of institutions and policies a
country formalizes and practises. Lastly, we discussed the Indian scenario in
relation to the reform policies and decentralization of institutions with the
background of economic development and its relation to the institutions.
160
UNIT 11 THEORIES OF REGULATION
Structure
11.0 Objectives
11.1 Introduction
11.2 Economic Regulation
11.2.1 Direct Regulation
11.2.2 Price Controls
11.3 Regulation of Natural Monopolies and Public Utilities
11.4 Public Interest Theory
11.5 Public Choice Theory
11.6 Theory of Regulatory Capture
11.6 Let Us Sum Up
11.7 Answers/Hints to Check Your Progress Exercises
11.0 OBJECTIVES
After going through the unit you should be able to:
Define economic regulation;
Discuss the arguments in favour of economic regulation;
Describe the various types of regulation, particularly regulation of public
utilities;
Critically evaluate the public interest and public choice theories of economic
regulation; and
Discuss the theory of regulatory capture.
11.1 INTRODUCTION
This unit and the subsequent one take up for discussion issues relating to
governance in developing nations. In the previous unit you studied about
institutions and democracy. You would have realized that institutions and
democracy have important bearing on economic outcomes and on the process of
economic development of developing nations. Hence it is important to
understand the role of government in economic development.
In your earlier courses on microeconomics and macroeconomics, you became
familiar with the role of government in promoting efficiency in the economy, in
establishing and maintaining property rights and rule of Law, and also
macroeconomic policies like fiscal and monetary policies as well as policies
related to international trade and finance. The previous unit (Unit 10) discussed
the role of institutions, as well as the State and democratic processes in economic
Shri Saugato Sen Associate Professor of Economics, IGNOU, New Delhi
Poltical Institutions development. Other than the legal and governance framework and various
and the Functioing of
the State
policies like monetary and fiscal policies, the state participates in the economy
through ownership, as well regulation In the last unit of this course, we will go
into greater detail about the ways government action can fail to enhance welfare,
and also about corruption. But before that, in this unit, we look at one type of
government participation in the economy, namely, economic regulation.
As you would know, regulation can be economic as well as in non-economic
spheres. As an example of non-economic regulation, government can regulate
protocols with regard to patients of some pandemic in terms of isolation or
quarantine. In this unit we shall consider economic regulation and not non-
economic regulation. Economic regulation basically suggests that there are areas
or sectors which the government may not own, or participate as producer or
provider of services, but regulates the private sector which provides the services
or products in this area.
The unit is organised as follows: the next section we discuss economic
regulation. The section explains what regulation means and who does the
regulating. It discusses the aims of regulation and what are the arguments for
regulation. It discusses in some detail the regulation tools at the disposal of the
regulating agency. The various types of regulation, like direct regulation, price
regulation, regulation of entry and exit etc , are discussed. In the next section, the
method of regulating a natural monopoly and public utility are discussed. Natural
monopoly is defined not so much in terms of number of firms present in the
market, but whether a single firm is able to cater to all of the demand in the
market. We find that often public utilities are natural monopolies in that a single
firm meets all of the demand for the utility in a given geographical area. The unit
discusses how public utilities are regulated.
The unit then goes on to discuss two important theories regarding economic
regulation. First, the public interest theory of regulation will be discussed. This
theory assumes that regulators act in the public interest and have the interest of
the consumers and the general public in mind. It also assumes that regulators
have full information and knowledge about all relevant parameters. A later
variant of the public interest theory suggests that regulation may not lead to
optimal efficiency and there may be costs to regulation, but regulation can lead to
corrections for market failures. The other theory of regulation is public choice
theory. Public choice theory suggests that government officials like regulators act
in their own interest most of the time, and their actions do not always further the
public interest. Applied to the area of economic regulation, public choice theory
Hence in most cases economic regulation does not lead to optimal outcomes in
terms of efficiency and resource allocation. Finally, the unit discusses the theory
of regulatory capture, which suggests that those firms that are being regulated
end up ‘capturing’ the regulatory process, and the regulatory authorities end up
taking actions that help the firms themselves. The theory of regulatory capture
suggests that not only does not serve the public interest, but regulation can
162
actually help the organistion or firm being regulated as the firm can manipulate Theories of
and ‘capture’ the regulatory process, and turn the regulatory process to its own Regulation
advantage.
163
Poltical Institutions 11.2.1 Direct Regulation
and the Functioing of
the State There are several ways in which government regulates private sector provider of
goods and services. One way is what is called direct regulation. Direct regulation
is also known as command- and –control regulation. In this form of regulation,
the government takes certain actions to control the amount of a certain activity.
In this form of regulation the government aims at control of quantity.
The example about pollution is an instance of direct regulation. Ensuring safety
of food and medicines is another instance of direct regulation. Food Safety and
Standards Authority of India (FSSA) regulates levels of safety of food products
in India. Supposing it is left to the market to ensure that products meet quality. It
would be difficult as in the market system it would be costly for each individual
consumer to acquire information about quality. Consider medicines. Each
consumer would find it very difficult to ascertain that medicines meet a certain
standard. Moreover each consumer would separately have to determine and
gauge quality, and there would be massive duplication of effort. Another example
of direct regulation would be sale and purchase of alcoholic drinks. Some
governments may impose prohibition and prohibit the sale of alcohol in that state.
Residents of that state may be required to have permits to bring in alcoholic
drinks from other states. Or the government may fix a certain minimum age for a
person to be eligible to purchase or consume alcoholic drinks.
11.2.2 Price Control
Sometimes the government intervenes in the market by setting a maximum or
minimum price for some product. The regulated price may take the form of price
controls. These controlled prices may be above or in some case below the
equilibrium market price that would otherwise prevail. For example, rent may be
controlled in the sense that the government may decree that rent cannot be above
a certain level. Or in the labour market, the government may fix a minimum
wage that employers, even in the private sector, have mandatorily to pay their
workers. In India, in some cities, fares of taxis and auto-rickshaws may be
determined by the government in terms of the maximum fare at the base or
starting level, and how much additional fare the driver is allowed to charge per
kilometer. However, since monitoring costs may be high, actual auto-rickshaw
fares are sometimes determined by bargaining between the driver and passenger!
Price regulation may specify a particular price that firms must charge, or may
instead restrict firms to setting price within some range. If the concern of the
regulating agency is that a regulated monopolist will set price too high,
regulation is likely to specify a maximum price that can be charged. If the
regulated firm has some competitors that are unregulated, the regulatory agency
may also be concerned that the regulated firm will engage in predatory pricing
(that is, pricing so as to force its competitors to exit the market). In that situation,
regulation is likely to involve a minimum price as well as a maximum price.
Sometimes, regulation specifies more than a single price. The specification of a
price structure as opposed to just a single price greatly increases the complexity
164
of implementing economic regulation and can result in additional welfare losses. Theories of
In practice, price regulation may be the means by which a regulatory agency Regulation
165
Poltical Institutions
and the Functioing of
11.3 REGULATION OF NATURAL MONOPOLIES
the State AND PUBLIC UTILITIES
In the previous section, you became acquainted with the concept of regulation
and the various ways in which regulation is carried out. This section focuses on
the regulation of natural monopolies. Let us see what is a monopolist and a
natural monopolist. You may recall your study of a monopolist in your courses
on microeconomics. We know that a firm’s domination of a market is most
complete when it is the sole seller or sole buyer in a market, that is, when it is a
monopolist or a monopsonist. This section examines some of the consequences
of monopoly. What is then a natural monopolist. Let us recall the definition of
returns to scale. A production process displays increasing returns to scale if output
more than doubles when the use of every input is doubled. The cost curves of a
firm that produces under increasing returns to scale have two important
properties:
• Average cost falls as output rises.
• Marginal cost is everywhere below average cost.
benefits would ultimately be lower than they were before the regulator’s
intervention.
What is the best outcome that the regulator can achieve? Social welfare increases as
output rises but the monopolist’s profits fall. The monopolist should be required
to raise its output until its profits are driven to zero (since these are the smallest
profits consistent with the monopolist’s
ˆ continued participation in the market).
The regulator wants profits to fall to zero at the highest possible output, so it will
allow the monopolist to charge the highest price that the market will bear. Then the
monopolist’s price is equal to the vertical distance to the demand curve and its
average cost is equal to the vertical distance to the average cost curve. Its profits
are zero when these two distances are equal.
The alternative to regulation is government ownership. A government-owned
firm does not need to earn non-negative profits, because its fixed costs can be paid
out of the government’s general revenues. A change from regulation to
government ownership would eliminate the remaining welfare cost of monopoly.
The above points may have made you think that social welfare is higher under
government ownership than under regulation, but it is somewhat misleading. The
fixed costs of a government-owned monopolist are paid out of tax revenues, so
opting for government ownership forces the government to adjust its budget. It
has two options: it can reduce spending on other programmes, or it can raise tax
revenues.
Hence, in some cases, regulation might be preferred to government ownership.
Both policies have been, and are being used to deal with natural monopoly.
Utilities like water, sewage, and mail delivery are natural monopolies, and these
services are typically provided by government-owned firms. Local telephone
service and cable TV are often provided by monopolies that are regulated.
Let us now discuss further the regulation of public utilities. Public utilities are
found both in the public as well as private sector. The first objective in
regulating a public utility is to make it charge a price that would be fair and
reasonable to consumers. Further, there are issues like marginal-cost pricing and
optimal pricing. There is also the institutional approach to rate-making, which
looks at the criteria by which the base rate is determined and a fair rate of return
to the public utility.
Public utilities as we saw above are natural monopolies which have increasing
returns to scale, and hence decreasing average costs.. When looking at the
demand for the public utility service, we find that demand is determined by the
time pattern, and the elasticity of demand.. Thus often there is price
discrimination. The crucial task of the regulator is to determine a reasonable
price. that is equitable. A theoretical first-best criterion is to choose the price such
that it equals marginal cost. In perfect competition, price would also equal
167
Poltical Institutions average cost. But in monopoly marginal cost pricing would probably lead to
and the Functioing of
the State
losses which may be subsidized, and there may be corresponding increasing in
taxation. There can be a two-part tariff to ensure that the public utility covers its
marginal as well as fixed costs. Another type of differential pricing is peak-load
pricing, often used in electricity pricing. Here prices are charged differently at
different times depending on demand. Hence marginal cost will differ and
capacity utilization would vary. Sometimes in practice, marginal cost pricing is
difficult to use, and hence a reasonable rate is determined that allows the public
utility to get a reasonable rate of return on the capital invested. It is necessary to
establish a base rate which is the property value against which the firm’s profits
are compared. Cost of services, reasonable rate of return on capital invested are
determing factors in arriving a pricing principle.
Check Your Progress 1
1. Explain the concept of direct regulation.
……………………………………………………………….................…..
……………………………………………………………….................…..
……………………………………………………………….................…..
……………………………………………………………….................…..
2. Discuss how price regulation is carried out.
……………………………………………………………….................…..
……………………………………………………………….................…..
……………………………………………………………….................…..
……………………………………………………………….................…..
3. What do you understand by a natural monopoly? Why are public utilities
usually natural monopolies?
……………………………………………………………….................…..
……………………………………………………………….................…..
……………………………………………………………….................…..
……………………………………………………………….................…..
theory of regulation.
The first group of regulation theories proceeds from the assumptions of full
information, perfect enforcement and benevolent regulators. According to these
theories, the regulation of firms or other economic actors contributes to the
promotion of the public interest. This public interest can further be described as
the best possible allocation of scarce resources for individual and collective
goods and services in society. In western economies, the allocation of scarce
resources is to a significant extent coordinated by the market mechanism. In
theory, it can even be demonstrated that, under certain circumstances, the
allocation of resources by means of the market mechanism is optimal. ). Because
these conditions do frequently not apply in practice, the allocation of resources is
not optimal from a theoretical perspective. This situation is described as a market
failure. A market failure is a situation where scarce resources are not put to their
highest valued uses. In a market setting, these values are reflected in the prices of
goods and services. A market failure thus implies a discrepancy between the
price or value of an additional unit of a particular good or service and its
marginal cost. Equalization of prices and marginal costs characterizes an
equilibrium in a competitive market. If costs are lower than the given market
price, a firm will profit from a further expansion of production. If costs are higher
than price, a firm will increase its profits by curtailing production until price
again equals marginal cost. A market equilibrium, and more generally an
equilibrium of all markets is thus a situation of an optimal allocation of scarce
resources. In this situation supply equals demand and under the given
circumstances economic agents can do no better.
One of the methods of achieving efficiency in the allocation of resources when a
market failure is identified, is government regulation. In the earlier development
of the public interest theories of regulation, it was assumed that a market failure
was a sufficient condition to explain government regulation. But soon the theory
was criticized on the grounds that it assumed that theoretically efficient
institutions could be seen to efficiently replace or correct inefficient real world
institutions. This criticism has led to the development of a more serious public
interest theory of regulation by an “Economics of Law” approach. In the
original theory, the transaction costs and information costs of regulation were
assumed to be zero. By taking account of these costs, more comprehensive
public interest theories developed. It could be argued that government
regulation is comparatively the more efficient institution to deal with a number
of market failures. Thus this approach, in contrast to the earlier approach,
suggested that in the presence of market failure, government regulation can
comparatively improve the situation, but there is no guarantee that regulation
will lead to optimal efficiency conditions. For example, with respect to the
public utilities, as we have seen, the transaction cost of government regulation in
establishing fair prices and a just rate of return are lower than the costs of
169
Poltical Institutions unrestricted competition. These more serious versions of the public interest
and the Functioing of
the State
theories do not assume that regulation is perfect. They do assume the presence of
a market failure, and assume that regulation is comparatively the more efficient
institution and also, that for example deregulation takes place when more
efficient institutions develop. These theories also assume that politicians act in
the public interest or that the political process is efficient and that information
on the costs and benefits of regulation is widely distributed and available.
Imagine an unregulated natural monopoly firm supplying public utility services.
The firm makes supernormal profits, charges different prices to different
consumer groups and does not supply services to high-cost consumers in rural
areas. Economic theory predicts an inefficient allocation of resources. Without
regulatory intervention these costs are high. Interveningin the market results in a
decline of these welfare cost. The stronger the level of intervention, the lower
the welfare losses in the private sector will be. The naïve public interest theory
of regulation for example, would explain ‘fair rate of return’ regulation from the
presence of the natural monopoly firm. Prices must decline and production
increased until societal resources are allocated efficiently. The more complex
public interest theories of regulation take the costs of regulatory intervention
into account. The more a regulator intervenes in the private operation of the
firm, the higher the intervention costs will be. The regulator must have
information on cost and demand facing the firm before efficient prices can be
determined. There will be compliance cost for the firm in terms of time, effort
and resources. It will have to comply with procedures, adapt its administration
and incur productivity losses. Once put into practice, the cost of monitoring firm
behavior and enforcement of the regulations arises. It is to be expected that the
firm will behave strategically and conceal or disguise any relevant information
for the regulator. Furthermore, indirect costs are to be expected. The less profit
the firm makes, the lower the effort in decreasing production cost or in
developing new products and production technologies. Also less tangible effects
are predicted. Regulatory intervention makes private investments less secure.
Risks go up. Investment can decline. The public interest theories of regulation
thus basically assume a comparative analysis of institutions to have taken place
to efficiently allocate scarce resources in the economy.
170
subject to constraints. Public choice theory is also known as economic approach to Theories of
political science. Regulation
Applied to regulation, public choice theory says we should look at the motivation and
incentives of the members of the regulating agency in regulating the firm. Each official
and member of the regulating agency will act in a way so as to maximize his or her own
utility. Thus the official will look at his or her own gain, rather than that of society in
implementing the regulation. If the officials find that regulating the price, for example,
do not lead to any gains for them they may be lax in implementing. On the other hand
the officials, having the power over the firm may bargain with the firm in getting a good
deal for themselves in return for arriving at a regulatory system or level that does not
hurt the firm too much.
In effect, public choice theory suggests that officials who make up government
organizations like regulating agencies, are likely to act to promote their own gain rather
than the public interest. The implicit suggestion is that the economic regulation of firms
is not likely to maximize social welfare. Hence the underlying prescription is that
government should not interfere with the market mechanism even in the presence of
market failure.
In the next section we look at a theory of economic regulation that is related to public
choice theory.. This theory also contends that economic regulation does not always lead
serving the public interest. Thus that theory is also opposed to the public interest. Let us
now study this theory, known as the theory of regulatory capture.
172
Now, when the RA sets the rates, consumers will not be aware of what is Theories of
happening, but the firm is very aware. Here, apply public choice theory and Regulation
174
to be regulated earlier. Hence it is of utmost importance that whatever the Theories of
extent of regulation is there is carried out efficiently and optimally. Regulation
The unit began by explaining what is economic regulation and how economic
regulation differs from social regulation. You were also familiarized with the
types of economic regulation: direct regulation or regulation by quantity;
price regulation; regulation of entry and exit, and so on. Then the unit went
on to explain what is meant by a natural monopoly and how it is regulated.
We saw that often public utilities are natural monopolies. Regulation of
natural monopolies and public utilities was discussed in detail.
Following this, the unit discussed at length the two main theories regarding
economic regulation. First, the public interest theory of regulation was
discussed. This theory assumed that regulators act in the public interest and
have the interest of the consumers and the general public in mind. It also
assumed that regulators have full information and knowledge about all
relevant parameters. A later variant of the public interest theory suggests that
regulation may not lead to optimal efficiency and there may be costs to
regulation, but regulation can lead to corrections for market failures. The
other theory of regulation is public choice theory. Public choice theory
suggests that government officials like regulators act in their own interest
most of the time, and their actions do not always further the public interest.
Hence in most cases economic regulation does not lead to optimal outcomes
in terms of efficiency and resource allocation. Finally, the unit discussed the
theory of regulatory capture, which suggests that those firms that are being
regulated end up ‘capturing’ the regulatory process, and the regulatory
authorities end up taking actions that help the firms themselves.
175
UNIT 12 GOVERNMENT FAILURE AND
CORRUPTION
Structure
12.0 Objectives
12.1 Introduction
12.2 Market Failure
12.3 The Role of Government in a Developing Economy
12.4 Government Failure
12.4.1Meaning of Government Failure
12.4.2 Causes of Government Failure
12.5 Corruption
12.5.1 Concept of Corruption
12.5.2 Causes of Corruption
12.6 Let Us Sum Up
12.7 Answers/Hints to Check Your Progress Exercises
12.0 OBJECTIVES
After going through this unit, you will be able to:
12.1 INTRODUCTION
This unit takes the discussion about the State and its role forward, from the
previous two units. Unit 10 had discussed about democracy in general, and the
role of institutions in economic development. The previous unit talked about
economic regulation., and how economic regulation is carried out. Unit 11 had
also talked about various theories of economic regulation, like public interest
theory of regulation, public choice theory of regulation, and the theory of
regulatory capture. This unit, the last of the course, provides a broad discussion
about government and governance in the context of developing nations.
Shri Saugato Sen Associate Professor of Economics, IGNOU, New Delhi
The unit begins with a discussion of market failure. You have read about market Government Failur
and Corruption
equilibrium in your microeconomics courses. However there are situations where
market equilibrium fails to attain Pareto optimality. This type of situation is
called market failure. The unit discusses market failure in general and the
various types of market failures there are, that is, the unit explains the various
situations and conditions that lead to outcomes that are described as market
failure. It then proceeds to suggest the role of government in correcting market
failure.
The role of the government, particularly in developing nations, is not limited to
correcting market failures. The government needs to establish rule of law, create
a system of contracts and ensure that these are honoured and generally there is
faith in the government. There are many other roles that the government plays in
developing nations, and the unit discusses these.
There are situations where the government, for certain reasons is not able to
realize its objectives. The government, in trying to correct market failures, ends
up in a situation that is suboptimal. These are situations of government failure.
Government failure is taken up for discussion.
Finally the unit presents a discussion on the problem of corruption. A definition
of corruption is provided, various types of corruption are mentioned and causes
of corruption is described.
177
Poltical Institutions situations. When an economy has reached a Pareto optimal state, it reaches a point on its
and the Functioing of
the State
utility possibility frontier and does not lie below the utility possibility frontier.
The second fundamental theorem states that given the proper initial distribution of
resources, a decentralised competitive economy will attain some point on its utility
possibility curve. Of course, any point on the utility possibility curve can be attained but
the important thing is that it will be a point on the frontier and not below it. Of course,
Pareto optimality says nothing about equity or the distribution of resources. Even under
Pareto optimality there might be gross inequality. Even if the resulting income
distribution is not acceptable, we need not abandon the competitive market mechanism.
We merely have to redistribute the initial wealth. At some specific distribution of the
initial wealth, there will be the decentralised market mechanism at work at will help to
attain the desired outcome.
The fundamental theorems of welfare economics make a powerful case for the market
mechanism. What it says is that if decision –making is decentralised, that is, individual
decision makers independently make their own decisions based on their own self interest
and there is competition at work, we do not need any centralised resource allocation
mechanism like a planning agency. The second fundamental theorem gives a modern
touch to Adam Smith’s principle of the invisible hand. The reason the second theorem
works, that is, the reason a decentralised competitive system ensures Pareto optimality is
that individuals, in making decisions to make optimum gains, equate their marginal
benefit to the marginal cost. You have come across decisionmaking using marginal
concepts in your microeconomics course. Of course, the fundamental theorems of
welfare economics talks about a situation where there is no change, things are static, and
firms are small and cannot influence prices. It gives quite a narrow perspective of
competition. Sometimes, people have made a case for the market mechanism with quite
a different perspective of the competitive system in mind. We have seen that the
fundamental theorems of welfare economics assert that if certain conditions are met, the
economy will be Paretooptimal. There are circumstances or situations where the market
is not Paretooptimal or Pareto efficient. These situations are called situations of market
failure and economists have suggested that these situations provide a justification for
government intervention and activities. What are these situations? The main ones are:
178
will generally restrict output to raise prices with a view to making profits. A monopolist, Government Failur
and Corruption
just like a firm under perfect competition, produces till the point where his marginal
revenue equals his marginal cost. Under monopoly however, the prices are higher and
equilibrium output is lower than under competition. Moreover, under monopoly, the
monopolist takes off part of the consumer surplus. But there is a certain portion that
accrues neither to seller nor to the buyers. This is called the deadweight loss under
monopoly. It is for these reasons that markets with monopolies do not attain Pareto
optimality and the situation is one of market failure.
Public Goods
There are goods that have two specific characteristics: firstly it is difficult to exclude
anyone from consuming these goods. Light going out to ships from a lighthouse, or
rather, the lighthouse itself is a classic example of this kind of a good in economics. The
other characteristic is that there is no rivalry in the consumption of a good. Consumption
by one person does not diminish the amount to be consumed by any one else. The
marginal cost to the additional individual enjoying the good is zero. A classic example is
national Defence. An example of a good showing rivalry is a shirt. These types of goods
displaying rivalry and exclusionability are called pure public goods. The market will not
supply, or will undersupply public goods, that is, supply in insufficient quantities.
Incomplete Markets
There are situations where markets fail to provide a good or service, even though the
cost of providing it is not more than what consumers are willing to pay for it. We call
this a situation of incomplete markets. This sort of situation is often encountered in
financial markets, particularly in markets for credit and insurance. There is the related
case of absence of complementary markets missing in some cases, or coordination
failures. All these are situations of market failure. Many people advocate a strong
government intervention in such situations.
Information Failures
Sometimes there is the presence of imperfect information in markets, and this provides a
rationale for government intervention. In these situations the fear is that in the absence of
government intervention, the market will provide too little information, so that some
parties to a transaction can get too much benefit. Collection and obtaining of information
ought not to be too costly.
There are other roles that have been put forward as legitimate for the State to
intervene and act in the economy, even in a market economy. The first of these is
to combat inflation, unemployment, and situations of disequilibria in some
markets, that is, to smooth out the ill effects of business cycles. Macroeconomic
stabilisation policy has long been an activity of the state, even in developed
nations, particularly since the Great Depression of the 1930s. You can read about
these policies in your macroeconomics course.
Two other important areas for the government to intervene in market economies
have been: to improve the income distribution which might emerge as an
outcome of the working of the market economy; secondly to compel people to
179
Poltical Institutions consume certain goods that the state thinks is in the best of the consumers
and the Functioing of
the State
themselves, or goods which consumers otherwise does not choose to consume
even though they know it is in their own best interests. These goods are called
merit goods. Private firms may provide these but also because the government
has compelled the people to consume these. Examples of such merit goods are
helmets for scooter riders or seat belts in cars. Some have viewed this action by
the government as stemming from the government purporting to decide on behalf
of consumers as a philosophy of paternalism. Critics feel a section of society is
imposing its will on others.
One basic role of the government that everybody agrees is necessary is the
government providing the legal framework and protecting property rights. This, it
is felt will provide the necessary incentives and assurance to private markets to
function smoothly and work efficiently.
182
Government Failur
12.4 GOVERNMENT FAILURE and Corruption
In sections 12.2 and 12.3 we saw that there are certain situations where the
government intervenes in the market to correct market failures. Also, government
might itself engage in production and supply of certain goods. Other than this, the
government provides administration. In certain societies the government
undertakes economic planning. The government undertakes monetary and fiscal
policy and incurs expenditures, generates revenues, provides subsidies and
transfers, and imposes taxes. Thus, the state performs many functions. But if we
limit ourselves to government intervention to correct the malfunctioning of the
market, we find that there are situations where the government may not in
practice be able to realise its intentions. Very often political factors come into
play and the intention of the government gets lost due to political factors.
The classic case for the government to intervene in the working of the market,
apart from its role in providing security and ensuring enforcing of contracts
between private agents, and its role in distribution, is that of market failure.
Market failure is any deviation from conditions of perfect competition, such as
externalities, information assumptions, monopolies, or the presence of public
goods. The case for government intervention in the economy in these situation as
also provision of public goods, is made by neoclassical economists on the
grounds that Pareto optimality will not obtain in these cases.
What public choice theorists and some other economists have managed to do is
forcefully argue and persuade the profession that merely the existence of
externalities does not mean that the government will do a good job, it does not
automatically make a care for the government. Governments could be inefficient
in provision, could overspend, may not pay heed to cost overturns. The situation
where government displays inefficiency in provision has been called
government failure.
184
government’s as well as from society’s point of view. You will read about Government Failur
and Corruption
corruption in the next section.
Yet another reason is that, as we mentioned earlier, electoral pressures sometimes
compel governments to take populist measures and undertake policies that do not
lead to outcomes that promote efficiency. Naturally this type of situation is likely
to take place more on the eve of elections. This may be true of national
governments as well as statelevel governments. Related to this is an added
reason, which is that the government often works with short run perspective in
mind. This is especially true about solutions that the government is trying to find
about problems. Trying to find shortterm solutions does not bring about
structural changes in the economy. This leaves many problems unaddressed.
One more reason for government failure is that government actions that are
prompted by some specific policy objective or social goal sometimes lead to
disincentive effects so that again, the optimal solution or outcome does not result.
For example, the government may be driven by the desire to realise some social
objectives but adopts a taxation policy that creates distortions in the economy and
lowers revenue.
Finally, there is a reason that is very significant as it exists in democratic
societies but is constantly undermining the ideals of democracy. This is that
certain special interest groups or pressure groups mange to capture the
policymaking process and get policies made that are to their advantage. Special
interest political groups like chambers of commerce, rich farmers’ groups,
professionals always try to influence the making of policies that will suit them.
Even when there are regulatory activities of the government to regulate the prices
and activities of monopolies, some business groups often take actions that
influence the regulatory process itself so that they actually benefit from the
regulatory processes as compared to other smaller firms. This is sometimes
described in the literature as ‘regulatory capture’ as we saw in the previous unit.
12.5 CORRUPTION
12.5.1 Concept of Corruption
We have touched upon the idea of government failure leading to corruption.
Let us elaborate more on the concept of corruption. While it may be difficult to
describe, corruption is generally not difficult to recognize when
observed. In most cases, different observers would agree on whether a
particular behavior connotes corruption.
Corruption has been defined in many different ways, each lacking in some
aspect. A few years ago, the question of definition absorbed a large proportion
of the time spent on discussions of corruption. The most popular and
simplest definition of corruption is that it is the abuse of public power
for private benefit. This is the definition used by the World Bank. From
this definition it should not be concluded that corruption cannot exist within
private sector activities. Especially in large private enterprises, this
185
Poltical Institutions phenomenon clearly exists, as for ex ample in procurement or even in
and the Functioing of
the State
hiring. It also exists in private activities regulated by the government
Sometimes, the abuse of public power is not necessarily for one's private
benefit but for the benefit of one's party, class, tribe, friends, family, and
so on. In fact, in many countries some of the proceeds of corruption go
to finance the activities of the political parties.
Among the economic changes that have taken place in recent years,
privatization has been most closely linked with corruption. There is no
question that public or state enterprises have been a major source of
corruption and especially of political corruption because they have
occasionally been used to finance the activities of political parties and to
provide jobs to the clienteles of particular political groups.
12.5.2 Causes of Corruption
Corruption is generally connected with the activities of the state and
especially with the monopoly and discretionary power of the state.
However, some of the least corrupt countries in the world, such as
Canada, Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands, and Sweden, have some of
the largest public sectors, measured as shares of tax revenue or public
spending in gross domestic product. The way the state operates and carries
out its functions is far more important than the size of public sector activity
measured in the traditional way, to determine the extent of corruption in a
nation.
In many countries, and especially in developing countries, the role of
the state is often carried out through the use of numerous rules or reg
ulations. In these countries licenses, permits, and authorizations of var
ious sorts are required to engage in many activities. The existence of
these regulations and authorizations gives a kind of monopoly power to
the officials who must authorize or inspect the ac tivities. These
officials may refuse the authorizations or may simply sit on a decision
for months or even years. Thus, they can use their public power to
extract bribes from those who need the authorizations or per mits. In
India, for example, the expression "licence raj" referred to the
individual who sold permits needed to engage in many forms of eco
nomic activities. In some countries, some individuals become middle
men or facilitators for obtaining these permits. The fact that in some
cases the regulations are nontransparent or are not even publicly avail
able and that an authorization can be obtained only from a specific of
fice or individualthat is, there is no competition in the granting of
these authorizationsgives the bureaucrats a great amount of power
and a good opportunity to extract bribes. Corruption can also happen
because of nexus and networks between powerful firms and industries and
politicians or political parties. The quality of bureaucracy sometimes
affects the extent of corruption.
186
The quality of the bureaucracy varies greatly among countries. In some, Government Failur
and Corruption
public sector jobs give a lot of prestige and status; in others, much less so.
Many factors contribute to that quality.
In the real world, relatively few people are punished for acts of cor
ruption, in spite of the extent of the phenomenon. Furthermore, with the
exception of a few countries, there seems to be a wide gap between the
penalties specified in the laws and regulations and the penalties that are
effectively imposed. Generally, effective penalties tend to be more lenient
than the statutory ones. The administrative procedures followed before a
public employee is punished for acts of corruption are slow and
cumbersome. Often legal, political, or administrative impediments prevent
the full or quick application of the penalties. All these factors limit the
role that penalties actually play in many countries, especially when
corruption is partly politically motivated. This attitude brings a toleration
for small acts of corruption that can in time encourage bigger acts.
Check Your Progress 2
1. What do you understand by government failure? How is it different from
market failure?
…………………………………………………........………………………
…………………………………………………........………………………
…………………………………………………........………………………
…………………………………………………........………………………
188
GLOSSARY
Absolute poverty : The situation of being unable or only barely able to
meet the subsistence essentials of food, clothing,
shelter, and basic health care. It is the inability to
provide for one’s own biological needs of sustenance
189
Corruption : The misuse and abuse of public office for private gain.
The appropriation of public resources for private
profit and other private purposes through the use and
abuse of official power or influence.
Gini Coefficient : It is the ratio of the area between the line of equal
distribution (diagonal 45º line) and the Lorenz curve
divided by the total area of the half-square in which
the curve lies.
Head Count Ratio The proportion of the number of people living below
the line of poverty in the total population.
:
191
Intensive growth : This refers to growth in per capita output level in an
economy.
192
Malnutrition : A state of ill-health resulting from an inadequate or
improper diet, usually measured in terms of average
daily protein consumption.
National income : Total money value of all final goods and services
produced in an economy during a period of time,
usually a year.
193
Personal : It describes income flows to individuals or
Distribution of households.
Income
Poverty Trap The idea that low savings rate and low capital-labour
ratio lead to an equilibrium situation where poor
:
nations are trapped in poverty.
Private property : Rights over the resource are clearly defined which
institution help manage the resources as it makes easier to
exercise control.
194
Solow Residual : Solow residual is a measure of the change in total
factor productivity in a Solow growth model. This is a
way of doing growth accounting. It represents that
part of growth in output which is not accounted for
by the growth in inputs. The Solow residual is also
known as Total Factor Productivity.
State institution : It is the institution wherein all the decisions are taken
by a central authority, generally known as
government.
195
SOME USEFUL BOOKS
Banerjee, Abhijit Vinayak, Benabou, Roland and Mookherjee, Dilip (eds) (2006)
Understanding Poverty, Oxford University Press, Oxford
Jones, Charles,I. (2013) Economic Growth second edition (Indian reprint) Viva-
Norton, New Delhi
Meier, Gerald M. and Rauch, James E (eds.) (2000). Leading Issues in Economic
Development (7th edition) Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Todaro, Michael P., and Smith, Stephen C. (2017) Development, Economics, 12th
edition (Indian reprint), Pearson, New Delhi.
196
BECC-114
DEVELOPMENT
ECONOMICS - II
EXPERT COMMITTEE
Prof. Atul Sarma (retd.) Prof. M S Bhat (retd.) Prof. S.K. Singh
Former Director, Jamia Millia Islamia Professor of Economics
Indian Statistical Institute, New Delhi (Retd)
New Delhi IGNOU, New Delhi
Prof. Kaustuva Barik Dr. Indrani Roy Choudhary Dr. S.P. Sharma
Indira Gandhi National Open University, Associate Professor, Economics Associate Professor,
New Delhi Jawaharlal Nehru University, Economics
New Delhi Shyam Lal College,
University of Delhi,
Delhi
Shri. B.S. Bagla Ms. Niti Arora
Associate Professor of Economics Assistant Professor Shri Saugato Sen
PGDAV College Mata Sundri College Associate Professor of
University of Delhi, University of Delhi, Economics
Delhi Delhi IGNOU, New Delhi
5
COURSE INTRODUCTION
Welcome to this course on Development Economics. Your memory is fresh from
your study of the first Course on Development Economics-I in the previous semester.
The present course is on Development Economics-II. This course builds upon the
course Development Economics-I. It discusses and analyses several topics in the
economics of development. The course consists of 14 units spread over 6 blocks.
The first block is titled Demography and Development. This block has two units.
They discuss demographic transition. The block also discusses issues of the link
between demographic features and economic development.
The second block is on Theories of Underdevelopment. There are three units in
this block. Although the name suggests that these are theories of underdevelopment,
you must not take these to mean they explain the reasons for underdevelopment.
They identify the underlying factors for underdevelopment and suggest ways to come
out of the underdevelopment status so as to foster economic development.
The third block in this course is on Land, Labour and Credit Markets. This
block takes an analytical look at some of the factor markets. The focus is primarily
on the rural sector. The three units look at the markets for land, labour and capital
respectively. They mainly do so in the context of rural areas in developing countries.
The idea is to see whether these markets function like the ones you studied
theoretically in your Microeconomics courses. The units in this block also considers
if some of these factor markets are interlinked.
The next block, block four, is on Individuals, Communities and Collective
Outcomes. This block has two units. They look at situations where outcomes and
processes are deviations from usual market equilibrium. Sometimes, in developing
countries, markets for some specific products or services may be missing. In these
situations, the role of norms and customs comes to the fore. In certain situations,
multiple equilibria may exist. The block covers the role of social institutions, local
rural bodies and NGOs. It also discusses governance issues in these institutions. The
very important topic of social capital is also discussed in this block.
Block five is on Environment and Sustainable Development. This block, too,
has two units. The block discusses the crucial topic of sustainable development
along with its linkage between environment and economic development. The block
also explains the concept of externality.
The last block, Block 6, is on Globalisation. This block also has two units. They
discuss the changing perspectives on globalization, that is, the changing connotation
and conceptualization of the terms globalization, its contents, and the impact of
globalization on economic development. For this, the block discusses theories of
international trade as well as barriers to trade (tariffs and quotas). It also covers in
brief the areas of international trade, multilateral trade agreements and trade blocks.
BLOCK 1
DEMOGRAPHY AND DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK INTRODUCTION
The first Block of this course discusses demography and development. It explains
the concepts of demography. Since population — its measurement, growth, levels etc.
are elements of demography, the block explains the impact of population growth and
levels on economic development. The block also discusses important concepts like
demographic transition, age structure of the population, etc.
The Block has two units, titled Demographic Transition and its Implications and
Demography and the Process of Development.
The first Unit is about the concepts of population and demography, age structure
of population, historical trends in developed and developing countries and the choices
involving fertility. The second unit discusses the impact of population growth on the
economy. It discusses the Solow and Harrod-Domar growth models to see how these
models can help understand the linkage between population growth and economic
growth. The unit also explains the negative impact of population growth on economic
development in terms of Malthus’s theory. The unit also covers other important topics
like human capital, rural-urban migration and gender-gap.
Demographic
UNIT 1 DEMOGRAPHIC TRANSITION AND ITS Transition and Its
IMPLICATIONS
Implications
Structure
1.0 Objectives
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Population: Some Basic Concepts
1.3 The Importance of Age Structure of the Population
1.4 The Hidden Momentum of Population Growth
1.5 The Theory of Demographic Transition
1.6 Historical Trends in Developing and Developed countries
1.6.1 Demographic Transition in Developed Countries
1.6.2 Demographic Transition in Developing Countries
1.7 The Adjustment of Birth Rates
1.7.1 Hoarding Versus Targeting
1.7.2 Cost-Benefit Approach to Fertility Choice
1.8 Is Fertility Too High?
1.9 Let Us Sum Up
1.10 Hints to Check Your Progress Exercises
1.0 OBJECTIVES
After studying this Unit, you should be able to:
examine the theory of demographic transition and its trends in developing and
developed countries.
explain the role of the age structure in the study of demography.
discuss the reasons for high population growth that creates an echo effect.
analyse the social and economic factors that affect fertility decisions at the
level of the household.
1.1 INTRODUCTION
The relationship between population growth and the economic development is a
complex one. There is ambiguity concerning what is the cause and what is the
Dr. Varun Bhushan, Assistant Professor, PGDAV College, University of Delhi.
11
Demography and
effect. Is population growth an impediment or a stimulus to economic
Development development? This has been debated by several economists. The pessimistic
argument states that population growth cannot be good for the country as it
consumes resources. There is less per head to go around. The optimistic argument
emphasizes that necessity is the mother of invention and without pressure of
population on resources there may be no necessity and consequently no
invention. Demographic transition takes us into the discussion about the close
relationship between what the new developed countries have demographically
experienced in the past and what is currently being experienced by the
developing countries. We shall address these issues of society in this unit. There
are wide patterns in the population growth influencing the decisions made by the
individual countries regarding policies on fertility. In this unit, we shall try to
answer the questions pertaining to how economic development affects fertility.
Also, the couple’s decision regarding family size if the social impact is to be
internalized.
12
Demographic
Age specific fertility rate: It is the average number of children per year born to Transition and Its
women in a particular age group. Implications
Total fertility rate: The number of children that would be born to a women if
she were to live to the end of her childbearing years and bear children in
accordance with the prevailing age-specific fertility rates. It is calculated by
adding up all the age specific fertility rates over different age groups.
Life expectancy at birth: The number of years a new born child would live
subject to the mortality risks prevailing for the population at the time of child’s
birth.
The accelerated economic growth that countries experience due to rising working
age population is also an important window of opportunity for strong income and
productivity gains. This is referred to as demographic dividend. During this
phase, working age population grows at a faster pace than the dependent
population. There are more human resources available to invest in human capital.
In contrast, there are high income countries where the proportion of working age
population decline as a result of population ageing. This requires increased
resources for old aged population support. This poses greater challenges as
higher savings rate would be required. In such situations, allowing for more
immigration can be helpful.
14
Demographic
transition is jointly made up of all these three stages or phases. Together they Transition and Its
explain why all contemporary developed and developing nations have passed Implications
through these phases. Almost all the countries can be described as currently in
second or third phase of demographic transition.
First Stage of Demographic Transition: Before economic modernization, all
contemporary developed nations for centuries had stable or very slow growing
populations as a result of a combination of high birth rates and almost equally
high death rates. The phase was marked for an increase in population though the
net growth rate was still minimal. Although the birth rates were high, death rates
were also sufficiently high and persistent to keep the growth rates down.
Second Stage of Demographic Transition: This stage began when
modernization was associated with better public health facilities, healthier diets
and higher incomes. These led to a marked reduction in mortality that gradually
raised life expectancy from 40 years to 60 years. However, the decline in death
rates was not immediately accompanied by a decline in fertility. The growing
divergence between high birth rates and falling death rates led to sharp increases
in population growth.
The very forces that caused death rates to decline also caused economic
productivity to increase. For example, the rise in agricultural productivity led to
an increase in overall carrying capacity of the economy. Secondly, birth rates are
high because of the inertia that characterizes fertility choices made by the
households.
Third Stage of Demographic Transition: In this stage, the forces and
influences of modernization and development causes the beginning of a decline
Birth rate and death rate per 1,000 population
40
Birth rate
Death rate
30 Population explosion
20
Total
population
10
High birth rates falling
death rates Stable death rates, falling
birth rates
Predevelopment Developed
0
First Stage Second Stage Third Stage
Time
From the Fig. 1.1, we can infer that during the first stage of demographic
transition, the birth rates and the death rates are high. As the country moves high
on the trajectory of economic development, the death rates fall with birth rates
staying high. This results in population explosion. Finally, the birth rates slow
down resulting in stable population growth rate.
In the developed countries, the fall in death rate was relatively gradual, limited by
the trial and error of innovation. The (i) improved production of food, (ii)
institution of sanitation methods and (iii) greater understanding and control over
disease by medical advances were a result of new discovery or invention. In
other words, they were different from the pre-existing stock of knowledge.
The initial level of birth rates was itself generally low in Western Europe. This
was a result of either late marriage or celibacy. Overall, rates of population
growth seldom exceeded the 1% level even at their peak. Birth rates in the later
years fell slowly due to technical progress. Population growth in these countries
was more of slow spurt rather than a violent explosion i.e. birth rates fluctuated
minutely and death rates remained fairly stable or rising gradually. The pattern of
demographic transition in European countries was thus clear.
1.6.2 Demographic Transition in Developing Countries
Birth rates in many developing countries are considerably higher than developed
countries because women tend to marry at an earlier age. As a result, there are
both more couples planning their families and more years of fertility period.
The decline in death rates was widespread and sudden. However, antibiotics were
available for a variety of illness i.e. they did not have to be invented. The use of
insecticides such as DDT provided an effective way to combat malaria to
manageable proportions. Public health organisations were able to have the benefit
of application of effective modern medical and public health technologies. This
caused death rates to fall rapidly. There was widespread application of
elementary methods of sanitation and hygiene. As a result, Stage 2 of
demographic transition came to be characterized by peak population growth
rates. This was well in excess of 2% per annum in most developing countries.
16
Demographic
Check Your Progress 1 Transition and Its
Implications
Note: i) Use the space given below for your answers.
ii) Check your progress with those answers given at the end of the unit.
1) State the three stages of demographic transition.
………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………….
2) What is meant by the notion of hidden momentum of population growth?
………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………….
3) What is meant by ‘dependency burden’? Is the dependency burden high or
low in developing countries?
………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………….
18
Although, falling death rates are central to the fertility decline, there are other Demographic
Transition and Its
factors in the construction of p that have little to do with the fall in death rates. Implications
1) The poorer the region, the greater the anticipated probability that a single
child will not earn enough in the adulthood to support parents and hence the
greater the incentive to have more children to compensate for this possibility.
2) Falling death rates cannot in any way affect the social possibilities of
fulfilling parental obligation. These are independent phenomena that continue
even with declining death rates. It might also contribute to keeping the birth
rates high.
3) There is no guarantee that a fall in the death rate will have any impact on the
degree of gender bias. There are two types of gender bias. One is the
observable bias which is a measurable indicator of differential treatment of
boys and girls. With development, such bias would lessen as the resource
constraints loosen. A second bias has to do with the intrinsic valuation of
women in a society. It feeds into the perception of women as sources of old-
age support.
In a situation where the infant mortality (death of an infant before age of one) is a
dominant form of uncertainty, wait and see strategy acquires feasibility. This is in
the sense that a couple can have a child and condition its next fertility decision,
based on the survival of this child. The desired number of children can then be
attained sequentially. This strategy is called targeting.
Other Goods
Other Goods
C
A A
D
B B
Children Children
(a) (b)
Fig. 1.2: Income Improvements and Fertility
20
Demographic
1.8 IS FERTILITY TOO HIGH? Transition and Its
Implications
Suppose if the family chooses to have a large number of children, then why
should social considerations dictate anything different? What factors cause a
systematic deviation between decisions that are privately optimal (from the point
of view of family) and decisions that are optimal from the point of view of
society? There are three answers to these questions.
1) Information and Uncertainty
The first answer relies on the incompleteness of information. People simply
may not internalize the general observation that death rates have undergone a
decline. In such cases the number of children that couples have may not be
socially optimal. Faced with fresh information regarding the environment that
influences their fertility choices and decision making the couple would
typically revise their fertility decisions.
The second answer relies on the distinction between decisions that are made
ex ante and their ex-post consequences. Consider the family that wants one
child but have five in hope of increasing the chances of old-age support. Such
decisions are based both on probability of child dying and on the degree of
aversion to risk of the family. Such families will have too many children and
they will suffer because these children will have to be looked after and fed.
2) Externalities
The third answer is based on the existence of externalities. Externalities arise
because the social and private costs (or benefits) of having children. These
externalities are particularly pervasive in situations where infrastructure is
provided by the government at little or no cost to users. In such cases it is not
possible for individual families to value these resources at their true social
cost because this is not the actual cost they pay.
For instance, consider the provision of free public education in urban areas. If
a benevolent social planner could dictate the number of children that all
families should have in that area, she would take the marginal social cost of
providing educational resources into account. However, if education is
provided free of charge, the private cost to the family is lower than the social
cost, which therefore will not be properly internalized. It follows that the
number of children that people choose to have will exceed the social
optimum.
Resources that are not properly priced such as environment can be depleted
even if they are renewable, they include fisheries, ground-water, forests, soil
quality etc. The main characteristic of such resources is that they are
generally under-priced so that financial incentives bias their use in the
direction of overexploitation. Such under-pricing reduces the cost of child
rearing, fertility is biased upwards.
21
Demography and Private and Social Costs and Fertility Decisions
Development
Let us summarize the effects of costs and benefits of having children in a general
framework. For simplicity we take the cost curve to be a straight line (so that
each new child costs the same additional amount) even though there are
diminishing returns to have more children. The benefit function has a familiar
concave shape. The socially optimum number of children is found by maximising
the vertical distance between the benefit line and the social cost line. This point is
found by setting marginal benefit equal to the marginal social cost which occurs
at point A and yields a number of children n*.
In contrast the privately optimal number of children is found by maximizing the
vertical distance between the benefit line and the private cost line. This occurs at
the point B with associated number n**. (Note that n** > n*)
Benefits
B
Social Costs
Costs and Benefits
A
Private Costs
The same kind of argument holds if there are grandparents to look after children.
If the grandparents’ costs are not fully internalized by the couple, they may have
too many children relative to what is optimal for their family, leave alone society
as a whole. As the structure changes from joint or extended family to nuclear
families, the costs of children are more directly borne by the couple, which leads
to decline in fertility.
22
Demographic
Transition and Its
23
Demography and rates somewhat lower than they really are in age-specific terms. Thus, a policy
Development
that brings down the total fertility rate may still cause population to overshoot a
desired target because of inertia.
The observation that birth rates remain high even as death rates fall is central to
understanding the population explosion in developing and developed countries.
Why don’t birth rates decline with death rates? It is because of macro-inertia of
birth rates in a young population and micro-inertia or inertia at micro level.
Limited information, missing market for old age security and gender bias are
factors that play an important role in slow reduction in fertility.
Finally, we shed light on the lack of information and uncertainty that play an
important role in factors that cause a systematic deviation between privately
optimal decisions and socially optimal decisions. Externalities arise because of
divergence between social and private costs (or benefits) of having children. In
this context, the role played by joint family or by externalities that are
environmental or employment related are of great importance.
2.0 OBJECTIVES
After studying this Unit, you should be able to:
Examine the relationship between population growth and economic
development;
Explain the dichotomy between the belief that world population growth is bad
and the belief that population growth would make them empowered;
Analyse the patterns of rural-urban migration utilising Harris-Todaro model;
Discuss how the framework of the Harris-Todaro model has been extended in
a number of different directions; and
State the role of education and health in human capital formation.
Dr. Varun Bhushan, Assistant Professor, PGDAV College, University of Delhi.
25
Demography and
Development 2.1 INTRODUCTION
Economic development is a process that transforms all persons of different
income groups and all sectors of the economy in some harmonious and even
fashion. But there is a possibility of uneven growth which is growth that first
proceeds by benefiting some groups in a society. The economic development
entails the rapid growth of some parts of the economy, while other parts are left
behind to stagnate or even shrink. As economic development proceeds
individuals move from rural to urban areas and agriculture acts as a supplier of
labour to industry. Agriculture must be capable of producing a surplus that can be
used to feed those who are engaged in non-agricultural pursuits. Thus, agriculture
is supplier of food to industry. In this unit we shall be studying about the Lewis
model followed by the Harris-Todaro model. The main idea of Harris Todaro
model is that formal urban sector pays a high wage to workers and it is this high
wage that creates urban unemployment. Finally, we discuss about the
significance of investing in health and education to capitalize the benefits of
demography.
In Solow model, a production function relates capital and labor to the production
of output. There is an implicit assumption made in the Solow model that capital
and labor can be substituted for each other indefinitely although the process of
substitution may become more and more costly. The cost is expressed by
marginal rate of substitution between two inputs of production and is captured by
the degree of curvature of the production isoquants.
There is some technical change incorporated in the Solow model at some
constant rate. Once the change in the capital-output ratio is taken into account,
the steady-state rate of growth is independent of the rate of savings and the rate
of population growth. All that matters for long-run growth is the rate of
technological progress. Population growth has no effect on the long-run rate of
per capita income growth. There is a level effect, however.
Population growth means that a given level of output must be divided among an
increasing number of people, so that an increase in the population growth rates
brings down the size of the per-capita cake. An increase in population growth
rate both increases the demand on national cake and expands the ability of capital
to produce the national cake. The net effect on long run per-capita growth rates is
zero. Nevertheless, the level of per-capita income at any given point in time is
lowered. (Fig. 2.1)
This comes from the assumption in the Solow model that there are diminishing
returns to every input, so that increase in labor intensity of production
(necessitated by increased population growth) reduces the long-run per-capita
level of output relative to efficiency units of labor.
27
B
(1+n)kTi
me
k* k
Fig. 2.1: Growth Rates are Unaffected, but the Levels Shift Down
If n goes up, this “swivels” the line upward and brings down the steady-state
level of the capital stock, expressed as a ratio of effective labor. This means that
although the long-run rate of growth is unaffected by a change in the rate of
population growth, the entire trajectory of growth is shifted downward. Thus,
increased population growth has negative level effects in the standard growth
models. (Fig. 2.1)
(1-δ)k+sy
(1-δ)k+sy
Demand-Driven View
The effect of population growth on technical progress can, in turn, be divided
into two parts. First, population growth may spur technical progress out of the
pressures created by high population density. This is the “demand-driven” view
explored by Boserup [1981].
Supply-Driven View
Second, population growth creates a larger pool of potential innovators and
therefore a larger stock of ideas and innovations that can be put to economic use.
This is the “supply-driven” view taken by Simon [1977] and Kuznets [I960].
31
Demography and Population, Necessity and Innovation
Development
It is true that scarcity drove man to innovate, to create or to apply methods of
production that accommodated the increased population by a quantum jump in
food output. Agriculture is a leading example of how high population densities
go hand in hand with technologically more intensive forms of farming. But
according to Boserup (1981) ‘Manufacturing industries required skilled workers
and traders as well as financial services and administrative skills which were
more concentrated in urbanised areas. The areas in Europe which first developed
manufacturing industries were those with the highest population densities.
Problems with the Demand-Driven Approach
The major problem is that what is attributed to population growth can also be
attributed to increased per-capita income. It is the combination of the two that is
likely to drive innovation or is motivated by the desire to make economic profit.
An increased population might correspond to a greater social need, but that need
must be manifested in economic demand through the marketplace for innovators
to respond. The second problem with the demand-driven approach is that it
predicts some degree of cyclicity in per capita incomes: innovations raise per
capita income as production levels kick up following the innovation, but as
population swells to bridge the newly created gap, with per capita incomes falling
once again until the pressure of resources triggers another bout of innovation.
Population, Diversity, and Innovation
The gist of the supply-driven argument is that everybody has an independent
chance of coming up with an idea that will benefit the rest of the human race. The
larger the population, the larger would be the number of people that have useful
ideas, and so the higher is the rate of technical change.
Consider an initial level of per capita income that is so low that population
growth increases with per capita income. Population is growing, and it follows
that the pace of technical progress must accelerate.
Population Growth Rates
Population Growth Rates
Fig. 2.3: Population Growth, Per Capita Income and Population Levels
32
Demography and the
As long as we are on the upward-sloping part of the curve, per capita income Process of
must rise and so must the rate of population growth. Thus, during this phase, we Development
obtain the prediction that the population growth rate is increasing with the size of
the population. This state of affairs continues until we reach the point at which
population growth rates begin to decline in income. As long as growth rates are
positive, however, the population will still grow, so that technical progress will
continue to accelerate. Coupled with a diminishing pace of population growth,
this implies an acceleration in the long-run rate of growth of per capita income.
Thus, population growth rates decline even faster. This period is therefore
associated with a leveling-off and consequent decline in the rate of growth of the
population. No longer will population growth rates increase with population, they
should decline.
If technical progress is “supply-driven” by the population, then population
growth should initially be an increasing function of population itself, but this
trend should reverse itself after some stage. P* is threshold level of population
that permits technical progress at a rate such that the threshold per-capita income
of y* is just reached after this point the population growth rates turn down as per-
capita income climbs even further. A simple extension of the model can be used
to account for this seeming discrepancy: simply allow technical progress to be a
function not just of population size, but also of the per capita income of the
society. After all, it takes brains coupled with economic resources to carry out
useful scientific research.
𝑤
̅
B A Labor
Fig. 2.4: Surplus Labor in the Family Farm
We take an example of the production function on a family farm where land is
fixed and hence there are diminishing returns to the labor input. The production
function is drawn so that after a certain level of labor input, there is no significant
effect on output. If the total labor input is A and total output is AQ then Average
income = AQ/A which is ϖ.
There is only so much intensity at which a given plot of land can be cultivated,
and after a point additional input of labor may have no effect at all. Thus, the
marginal product of labor at points such as A is zero or close to zero. When
reduction in the amount of labor happens from A to B, total output stays constant.
It is because the family farm has so much labor relative to land, labor is in
surplus. This situation might occur in economies where there is high population
pressure, so that there are large numbers of people per acre of arable land. This
phenomenon is not just limited to agriculture but applies to whole range of casual
jobs.
Income sharing and surplus labor
i) An entrepreneur hires labor only to the point where marginal product equals
the wage. With more labor than this, gains can be realized by cutting back on
employed labor and saving on the wage bill. Hence the wages stay positive
and marginal product is close to zero.
ii) Asymmetry between traditional sector and modern sector.
35
Demography and a) Production Methods
Development
The traditional sector involves activity intensive in labour and land but
not requiring significant quantities of capital.
b) Organization
A profit-maximizing firm regards wage payments to employees as a cost
of production, that is subtracted from revenues in order to arrive at final
profits. In contrast, a family farm might employ labor beyond the point
where the marginal product equals the “wage”, because the wage in this
case is not really a wage at all, but the average output of the farm (which
is what each member receives as compensation).
iii) Rosenstein-Rodan (1943) and Nurkse (1953) were among the writers that
realized that the presence of redundant labour in agriculture sector with no
loss in agriculture output. Surplus labour is therefore supply of labour that is
likely to be of major quantitative importance in development process of less
developed economies.
Two extensions of the surplus labor concept
Surplus labor as defined is purely a technological concept: there is simply too
much labor relative to land, or more generally, too many people relative to other
inputs of production, so that individuals are in surplus relative to production
possibilities: remove them to other activities and output will not change because
the additional labor power is of no use at all: the marginal product of labor is
literally zero.
1) Disguised unemployment
If we suppose that there is a capitalist sector elsewhere that does pay
according to marginal product, then the economy will exhibit a wage rate (for
unskilled labor) that is a true measure of the marginal product elsewhere, and
there will be efficiency gains available as long as the marginal product on the
traditional activity is less than the wage, whether it is zero or not. This
extended concept is known as disguised unemployment. The amount of
disguised unemployment may be measured roughly by the difference between
the existing labor input in the traditional activity and the labor input that sets
marginal product equal to the wage.
2) Surplus labor versus surplus laborers
We remove laborers, not labor. The remaining laborers in the traditional
activity typically adjust their labor input once some laborers are removed
(say, through rural–urban migration).If there is an increase in work effort on
the part of the remaining laborers, total output may not fall even though the
marginal product of labor is zero. This argument was originally made by Sen
[1966].
36
Demography and the
Process of
Development
Production Function
Output
Q
Output
Production Function
Q
family Labor
Marginal Cost of
Family Labor
Total Labour Input Total Family Labour Labour Input falls Total Family Labour
37
Industrial wage
Demand curves for Supply curve of
Industrial Labour Industrial Labour
w*
Average Surplus
𝒘
̅
A’ B’ C’
Industrial Labour
Agricultural output
Output
Wage Bill
Commercialisation
Surplus Labour
Disguised Unemployment
A B C 𝒘
̅
Agricultural Labour
Capital accumulation in the industrial sector is the engine of growth. More capital
means a greater demand for labor, which, in turn, induces greater rural–urban
migration. As development proceeds, the terms of trade gradually turn against
industry: food prices rise because a smaller number of farmers must support a
greater number of nonagricultural workers. The rise in the price of food causes an
increase in the industrial wage rate. The pace of development is driven by the
accumulation of capital, but is limited by the ability of the economy to produce a
surplus of food.
WF A D WA
W*
Agricultural Wage
W*
Formal Wage
C B
L*F L*A
Fig. 2.7: Market Equilibrium with Flexible Wages
w*: Equilibrium wage rate
LA*: Individuals in agrarian sector
L *
F : Individuals in urban sector
To alleviate persistent migration between one sector and the other, the wages in
the two sectors must be equalized. These two absorption curves combine to
analyze the equilibrium.
WF WA
A D
U
̅
𝑊 ̅
𝑊
Agricultural Wage
Formal Wage
𝑊̇
C B
𝐿̅F 𝐿̅A
Formal Urban
p
Agriculture 1− p q
Informal Urban
1− q
Unemployment
WF WA
̅
𝑊
WA
Agricultural Wage
Formal Wage
𝐿̅F LI LA
where 𝑤′𝐴′ denotes the new agricultural wage after the policy.
How do we compare the magnitudes? Recall that if the agricultural wage rises (or
at least does not fall) after the introduction of the policy, it must be the case that
the new expected wage in the urban sector exceeds the old expected wage. The
only way in which this can happen is if:
̅𝐹
𝐿′ ̅𝐹
𝐿′
>
̅ 𝐹 + 𝐿′
𝐿′ ̅𝐼 ̅ 𝐹 + 𝐿′
𝐿′ ̅𝐼
In other words, if the share of the formal sector in total urban sector employment
goes up. This is a beneficial implication of the policy: the informal sector does
shrink, measured as a fraction of the total urban sector.
If the share of formal sector in total urban sector employment goes up, the
informal sector does shrink (measured as a fraction of the total urban sector).
Although it may be true that the informal sector shrinks as a fraction of the urban
labor force, it is also true that the size of the urban labor force expands. If the
latter effect dominates the former, the informal sector may well expand—an
implication of a policy that was directly aimed at reducing the size of that sector.
Attempts to increase the demand for labor in the formal sector may enlarge the
size of the informal sector, as migrants respond to the better job conditions that
are available. The migration effect may dominate the initial “soak-up effect.
46
Demography and the
3) a) In the Harris-Todaro model, suppose the initial level of urban Process of
employment is EU = 2 million, the total urban labor force is LU = 3 Development
million, the urban wage is fixed by law at WU = 6 and the rural wage is
WR = 3. If the probability of finding a formal sector job is defined as
EU/LU,
i) Will a person who is currently in the rural sector find it optimal to
migrate to the urban sector?
ii) If the urban employment and urban and rural wages remain fixed,
solve for the level of the urban labor force which will result in the
post migration Harris-Todaro equilibrium.
iii) Stating with initial situation how many rural people must migrate to
the urban sector in search of jobs to achieve the equilibrium as
obtained in part ii)
………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………….
b) Briefly explain the Harris-Todaro model of rural-urban migration and
argue that despite acceleration in the rate of absorption of labor in the
formal sector, the informal sector as a fraction of the total labor force
increases.
………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………….
Formally the income gains can be written as summation over expected years of
working life where E is income with extra education, N is income without extra
education, t is year, i is the discount rate.
48
Ʃ (Et–Nt)/ (1+i) t Demography and the
Process of
Development
An analogous formula applies to health such as improved nutritional status with
direct and indirect cost of resources devoted to health compared with the extra
income gained in the future as a result of higher health status.
Nobel laureate Amartya Sen concludes that the Sub-Saharan female male ratio of
1.022 as the benchmark yields an estimate of 44 million missing women in
China, 37 million in India and total of these countries still in excess of 100
million. The main culprit of female infanticide has been neglect of female health
and nutrition especially during childhood. In China the extent of neglect may
have increased sharply since compulsory family restrictions (one-child policy in
some parts of country) were introduced in 1979.
49
Demography and
Check Your Progress 3
Development 1) Identify the elements of the human capital approach. Why are health
and education so closely linked in the development challenge?
2) How the preference for a male child leads to an increase in the rate of
growth of population?
3) Briefly explain the concept of ‘Missing Women’? What are the
consequences of gender bias?
51
BLOCK 2 Linear Theories of
Underdevelopment
THEORIES OF UNDERDEVELOPMENT
BLOCK INTRODUCTION
The present Block, the second of this course, discusses Theories of
Underdevelopment. It discusses why developing countries are poor, how they
became underdeveloped, what explains their present levels of development and
what can these countries do i.e. what policies they can follow to come out of
underdevelopment and to attain higher levels of development.
The Block has three units, titled Linear Theories of
Underdevelopment, Structural Theories of Development and
Dependency Theories of Development. The first Unit discusses theories
that see the process of development of countries as a movement from a
situation of underdevelopment to development. The second unit discusses
the impact of population growth on population. It discusses the Solow and
Harrod-Domar growth models to see how these models explains the impact of
population growth on economic development. To bring out the negative impact
of population growth on economic development the unit discusses Malthus’s
views. Some of the other important topics covered in this unit are human
capital, rural-urban migration and gender-gap. Unit 5 discusses various theories
of underdevelopment.
53
Linear Theories of
UNIT 3 LINEAR THEORIES OF UNDERDEVELOPMENT
Underdevelopment
Structure
3.0 Objectives
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Linear Theories
3.2.1 Marx's Stages of Growth
3.2.2 Linear Stages of Growth Model – Rostow
3.2.3 Kuznets’ Theory
3.2.4 Harrod–Domar Model
3.3 Limitations of Linear Theories
3.4 State Intervention and Related Policy Implications
3.5 Let Us Sum Up
3.6 Hints to Check Your Progress Exercises
3.0 OBJECTIVES
After studying this Unit, you should be able to:
outline the theory behind economic underdevelopment;
discuss the evolution of classical theories of economic underdevelopment;
analyse the implications of the Linear Theories [viz. Marx’s Stages of
Growth, Rostow’s Linear Stages of Growth, Kuznets’ Theory and Harrod-
Domar Model];
state the limitations of the Linear Theories of underdevelopment and
explain the policy implications of the linear theories.
3.1 INTRODUCTION
Economic progress is an essential component of every country. Development is
not purely an economic phenomenon. It encompasses more than the material and
financial side of people’s lives. It is, therefore, perceived as a multidimensional
process involving the reorganization and reorientation of entire economic and
socio-political systems. In addition to improvements in incomes and output, it
typically involves radical changes in institutional, social and administrative
structures as well as popular attitudes, customs and beliefs. The first idea that
Dr. Puja Saxena Nigam, Associate Professor, Economics, Hindu College, University of Delhi,
New Delhi.
55
Theories of emerged was that all major countries have a potential for development i.e. those
Underdevelopment
that have not developed, but can, are underdeveloped. With respect to this, two
questions came up and were answered by economists worldwide. One is how is
the level of development measured? The second is, compared to which desirable
characteristics of development, the backward countries are classified as
underdeveloped? In answers to these two questions, it was agreed that the
standard of living and per capita income are the measures of development and the
level of development of advanced or developed countries would be the
benchmark for their relative comparison. As a result, the idea of
underdevelopment equilibrium gained acceptance. This was followed by the
theories of Balanced and Unbalanced Growth.
Development theory is a collection of theories on how desirable change in
society is best achieved. If we explore the historical and intellectual evolution of
development, we come across four development theories. These offer valuable
insights and a useful perspective on the nature of development process. The
post-World War II literature on economic development dominated the four major
schools of thought. These are:
1) The Linear Stages of Growth Model
2) Theories and Patterns of Structural Change
3) The International-Dependence Revolution
4) The Neoclassical Free-Market Counter-Revolution
The 1950’s and 1960’s saw the economic theorists viewing the process of
development as a series of successive stages of economic growth through which
all countries must pass. It primarily focused on the right quantity and mixture of
‘Savings, Investment and foreign capital’. This was considered necessary to
enable the developing countries to proceed along an economic growth path that
had historically been followed by most developed countries.
This Linear-Stages approach was largely replaced in the 1970’s by two
competing schools of thought. The first of these focused on Theories and Patterns
of Structural Change. It used modern economic theory and statistical analysis to
portray the process of structural change needed by a growing country to
experience sustained rapid economic growth. The second, the International-
Dependence Revolution was more radical and political. It explained
underdevelopment in terms of: (i) international and power relationships, (ii)
institutional and structural economic rigidities, and (iii) the resulting proliferation
of dual economies. Dependence theories emphasized on the external and internal
institutional and political constraints on economic development. These, thus,
placed emphasis on the need for policies to eradicate poverty, to create
employment opportunities and to reduce inequalities.
Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, the fourth approach of neoclassical/neoliberal
56 counterview prevailed. It focused on the beneficial role of free markets, open
Linear Theories of
economies and the privatisation of inefficient public enterprises. According to Underdevelopment
this theory, failure to develop is the result of too much government intervention
and regulation of the country instead of exploitative external and internal forces.
Overall, the above diagram represents the Rostow's stages of growth discussed
here. In his work, Rostow admits that his theory and the stages are not merely
descriptive or factual, but is based on logic and continuity. He suggested increase
in savings and investment for economic growth and "capital constraint" as main
obstacle to the path of development.
The above relationship explains that the condition for achieving the steady state
growth is that ex-post savings must be equal to ex-post investment. “Warranted
growth” refers to that growth rate of the economy when it is working at full
capacity. It is also known as Full-capacity growth rate. This growth rate, denoted
by Gw, is interpreted as the rate of income growth required for full utilisation of a
growing stock of capital, so that entrepreneurs would be satisfied with the
amount of investment actually made.
Warranted growth rate (Gw) is determined by capital-output ratio and saving-
income ratio. The relationship between the warranted growth rate and its
determinants can be expressed as:
Gw Cr = S
where Cr shows the needed C to maintain the warranted growth rate and S is the
saving-income ratio. According to Harrod, the economy can achieve steady
growth when G = Gw and C = Cr. This condition states two things. Firstly, that
actual growth rate must be equal to the warranted growth rate. Secondly, the 65
Theories of capital-output ratio needed to achieve G must be equal to the required capital-
Underdevelopment
output ratio in order to maintain Gw, given that the saving co-efficient is S. This
amounts to saying that actual investment must be equal to the expected
investment at the given saving rate.
We have stated above that the steady-state growth of the economy requires an
equality between G and Gw on the one hand and C and Cr on the other. In a free-
enterprise economy, these equilibrium conditions would be satisfied only rarely,
if at all. Therefore, Harrod analyzed the situations when these conditions are not
satisfied. That is:
We first analyze the situation where G is greater than Gw. Under this situation,
the growth rate of income being greater than the growth rate of output, the
demand for output (because of the higher level of income) would exceed the
supply of output (because of the lower level of output) and the economy would
experience inflation. This can be explained in another way when C < Cr. Under
this situation, the actual amount of capital falls short of the required amount of
capital. This would lead to deficiency of capital, which would in turn adversely
affect the volume of goods to be produced. Decline in the level of output would
result in scarcity of goods and hence inflation. Thus, under this situation, the
economy will find itself in the quagmire of inflation.
On the other hand, when G is less than Gw, the growth rate of income would be
less than the growth rate of output. In this situation, there would be excess goods
for sale. But the income would not be sufficient to purchase those goods. In
Keynesian terminology, there would be deficiency of demand and consequently
the economy would face the problem of deflation. This situation can also be
explained when C is greater than Cr. In this situation, the actual amount of
capital would be larger than the required amount of capital for investment. The
larger amount of capital available for investment would dampen the marginal
efficiency of capital in the long run. Secular decline in the marginal efficiency of
capital would lead to chronic depression and unemployment. This is the state of
secular stagnation.
From the above analysis, it can be concluded that steady growth implies a
balance between G and Gw. In a free-enterprise economy, it is difficult to strike a
balance between G and Gw as the two are determined by altogether different sets
of factors. Since a slight deviation of G from Gw leads the economy away from
the steady-state growth path, it is called ‘knife-edge’ equilibrium.
Gn, the natural growth rate, is determined by natural conditions such as labour
force, natural resources, capital equipment, technical knowledge, etc. These
66 factors place a limit beyond which expansion of output is not feasible. This limit
Linear Theories of
is called Full-Employment Ceiling. This upper limit may change as the Underdevelopment
production factors grow, or as technological progress takes place. Thus, the
natural growth rate is the maximum growth rate which an economy can achieve
with its available natural resources.
The third fundamental relation in Harrod’s model showing the determinants of
natural growth rate is GnCr is either = S or ≠ S.
68
Linear Theories of
3.3 LIMITATIONS OF LINEAR THEORIES Underdevelopment
72
Linear Theories of
Check Your Progress 3 Underdevelopment
73
Theories of
Underdevelopment UNIT 4 STRUCTURAL THEORIES OF UNDER
DEVELOPMENT
Structure
4.0 Objectives
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Lewis Model
4.2.1 Assumptions
4.2.2 The Model
4.2.3 Limitations
4.2.4 Policy Implications
4.3 Kaldor Model
4.4 Thirlwall Approach
4.5 Chenery’s Patterns of Development Analysis
4.6 Development of a Tertiary Sector
4.6.1 Clark –Fischer
4.6.2 Victor Fuchs
4.7 Balanced and Unbalanced Growth Approaches
4.8 Let Us Sum Up
4.9 Hints to Check Your Progress Exercises
4.0 OBJECTIVES
After studying this Unit, you should be able to:
describe the emergence of Structural Change Models of Growth;
analyse the assumptions, working, limitations and policy implications of
Lewis Model;
discuss various models of structuralism viz. Kaldor, Chenery, Thirlwall;
trace the evolution of Tertiary sector and its role in the growth of
underdeveloped countries; and
distinguish between Balanced and Unbalanced growth theories.
Dr. Puja Saxena Nigam, Associate Professor, Economics, Hindu College, University of Delhi,
New Delhi
74
Structural Theories of
4.1 INTRODUCTION Underdevelopment
The world today comprises the developed and underdeveloped countries. They
are in sharp contrast to each other. While developed countries are rich and
affluent, underdeveloped countries are stuck in poverty and people struggling to
afford the basic necessities. With typical dissimilarities between these two parts
of the world, and the inherent structural differences that explain this polarization,
it is important to understand how exactly can a convergence be predicted.
Various schools of thought have been focusing on the requisite path to narrow the
gap between the rich and poor nations. As theories were introduced... accepted...
rejected and modified... it was understood that no single theory could possibly
explain the growth process to suit every country of the world. It has been
acknowledged nevertheless, that there are structural differences between
developed and underdeveloped countries. Amongst the various such differences,
the prominent one recognized by the growth theorists is the sectoral division of
economies based on occupational structure. While developed countries are led by
sophisticated and well developed secondary and tertiary sectors along with a
highly commercial agricultural sector, underdeveloped countries have a typically
primitive agricultural sector and a small modern or secondary sector
accompanied by an amateur services sector. Thus, a change in the occupational
structure of underdeveloped countries can pave way for them to take steps
towards their developed counterparts.
Structuralism is a development theory which focuses on the structural aspects of
the development process. The transformation of an economy from being a
subsistence agricultural to a modern, urbanized and service economy is the heart
of this theory. It calls for major Government intervention in the economy to fuel
industrial sector particularly the Import Substitution Industrialization (ISI). It is
to be pursued to create an economy that enjoys self-sustaining growth. The only
way for underdeveloped countries to grow is via this structural transformation i.e.
push industrialization and reduce their dependency on developed countries.
Three broad schools of theory on economic development have been highlighted
in terms of how each views the sector and activity specificity. The neo-classical
and neo-Schumpeterian schools are based on the assumption that an equilibrating
process leads to an optimal allocation of factors of production at least in medium
to long run. The third school, mainly the Lewis or Kaldor school, based on
Classical roots, discusses the importance of sectors by activity specificity. Neo-
classical theory is represented by Solow’s convergence where growth is driven
by incentives to save, accumulate physical and human capital and innovate.
In this Unit, we delve deeper into the structural transformation of underdeveloped
countries in terms of structural growth models given by Lewis, Kaldor, Chenery,
and Thirlwall. This group brings together the growth dynamics that are
dependent on development of manufacturing and services. 75
Theories of
Underdevelopment 4.2 LEWIS MODEL
Arthur Lewis in 1954 came up with a model of growth based on inherent dualism
in an economy which is the co-existence of traditional and modern sectors. The
focus of the model is on the structural transformation of a predominantly agrarian
economy. It is treated as a general theory of the development process in labour
surplus developing countries. Lewis’s basic model was later extended by Ranis
and Fei in 1961within the framework provided by Lewis.
4.2.1 Assumptions
An underdeveloped economy consists of two sectors - a traditional agriculture
sector and a modern industrial sector. The former is overpopulated and is
characterized by zero marginal productivity of Labour (that is surplus labour).
The surplus labour can be removed from this sector without causing total output
to fall. The modern industrial sector is characterized by higher labour
productivity. Such an economy will grow and gain by gradually transferring
labour from the subsistence agricultural sector to the modern industrial sector.
Two primary resource flows (from traditional to modern sector) characterize the
peculiarity of the model i.e. : a) transfer of surplus labour and b) surplus of food
that allows the non-agricultural labour force to survive. This lies at the heart of
structural transformation that occurs in most of the developing countries. The
modern sector grows in output and employment. In the process, the rate of
growth of the modern sector is determined solely by the rate of industrial
investment and capital accumulation. In this sector, it is assumed that only
capitalists save and workers don't. Entire profits of capitalists are saved. The
level of wages in the modern industrial sector is assumed to be constant and
determined over a fixed average subsistence level of wages prevailing in the
traditional agricultural sector. Hence, the supply curve of the modern sector is
assumed to be perfectly elastic up to a point. Thereafter, it would allow for wages
in the industry to rise in response to changes in the agricultural sector within the
dynamics of the two-sector economy. This happens when the agricultural sector
moves from an income sharing format to a market determined set up.
Demand
curves for Supply curve of
Industrial Labour IndustrialLabour
w*
Average Surplus
𝒘
̅
Output
Wage [w]
Commercialisation
Surplus Labour
Disguised Unemployment
A B C 𝒘
̅
Agricultural Labour
4.2.3 Limitations
The economic development under the Lewis Model, with surplus labour and
benefits of industrialization, may be limited by the following:
First, even if there is unlimited supply of labour, industrial projects may face the
shortages of skilled labour. Second, the industrial projects may find it difficult to 79
Theories of procure the initial capital equipment with which to employ the surplus workers.
Underdevelopment
Third, the migration of people from rural to urban sector makes considerable
demands on physical and social infrastructure facilities that may not be readily
available in less developed economies. These would be in terms of housing,
transport, public health services, schools and colleges. Fourth, the effective
absorption of surplus labour cannot be achieved without some fundamental
changes in the rural economic institutions as well. Fifth, profits may leak out of
the developing economies and find their way back to developed economies
through a process called capital flight. Sixth, the model assumes competitive
‘labour and product markets’, which may not exist in reality. And finally, the
economic benefits from industrialization might not trickle down to the majority
of population.
88
Dependency Theories
UNIT 5 DEPENDENCY THEORIES OF of Underdevelopment
UNDERDEVELOPMENT
Structure
5.0 Objectives
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Underdevelopment and Modernisation
5.3 Prebisch-Singer Hypothesis
5.4 Content and Structure of Dependency Theory
5.4.1 The Approach of Frank and dos Santos
5.4.2 The Approach of Sunkel and Furtado
5.4.3 The Approach of Cardoso
5.5 An Assessment of Dependency Theory
5.6 Relevance of Dependency Theory Today
5.7 Let Us Sum Up
5.8 Answer/Hints to Check Your Progress Exercises
5.0 OBJECTIVES
After studying this Unit, you should be able to:
discuss the notion of development as viewed by dependency theorists;
define the concepts of core and periphery in the context of the global
economy;
describe the genesis and evolution of dependency theory;
discuss the salient features of the Prebisch-Singer hypothesis;
explain how dependency theory was put forward as a critique of linear
growth theories; and
evaluate the strengths and the weaknesses of dependency theory and assess its
relevance in the present context.
5.1 INTRODUCTION
In the previous two Units, we dealt with linear theories of underdevelopment and
structural theories of unemployment. In both these units, several issues of
development and underdevelopment were discussed. As we observed, certain
Shri Saugato Sen, Associate Professor of Economics, IGNOU, New Delhi
89
Theories of features and approach were common to the models of underdevelopment (or
Underdevelopment
development). In linear theories and structural theories (when applied to
developing economies), the focus is on the trajectory of development–from being
less developed economies to becoming more developed ones. The linear theories
of economic growth (Harrod-Domar model and Rostow model in particular)
suggest that there are specific policy measures that can be taken by a developing
country to accelerate economic development. The structural theories focus on
identifying the underlying structure of the developing economies. The common
element of these development theories are that they suggest ways for the
developing economies to accelerate development, and progress from being
developing economies to developed ones.
In the present Unit, we discuss an altogether different approach to development,
that is, theories of underdevelopment. We place all these theories of
underdevelopment under a common category called Dependency Theory.
Dependency theory’s basic point is that in the global economy, the developed
(also called ‘advanced’) economies are the ‘centre’ and the developing
economies (or, underdeveloped economies as the dependency theorists insist on
calling these countries) is the ‘periphery’. It is through historical colonization that
the present day developing economies became underdeveloped. In the post
Second-World-War period when many of the developing economies attained
independence from colonial rule, there emerged certain relations of dependency.
The periphery countries become ‘dependent’ on the advanced countries of the
‘centre’.
The Unit is organized as follows: In Section 5.2 we discuss how the dependency
theorists look at the concept of underdevelopment, and what they say about the
genesis of underdevelopment and the consequences of modernization. In Section
5.3, you will be familiarized with the views of two economists, Raul Prebisch
and Hans Singer on the developing economies. According to these two
economists, the composition of the international trade and the terms of trade-of
the developing countries will turn against the developing countries. The Prebisch-
Singer hypothesis formed a precursor or a basis for the dependency theory. Thus,
in Section 5.4 we get into a discussion about the content and structure of the
dependency theory. We will look at the important features of this theory, as well
as the variants of this theory. In Section 5.5 we present an assessment of the
dependency theory, and probe whether in the present context, dependency theory
is still relevant.
93
Theories of
Underdevelopment
Check Your Progress 1
Note: i) Use the space given below for your answers.
ii) Check your progress with those answers given at the end of the unit.
1) What are the limitations of modernization theory as put forward by
dependency theorists?
………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………….
2) Why, according to the Prebisch-Singer hypothesis, does the terms-of-trade of
the less developed countries decline over time?
………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………….
95
Theories of i) The first one is the approach of Andre Gunder Frank and Theotonio dos
Underdevelopment
Santos. The main feature of their approach is that they deny the possibility
of capitalistic development in the periphery. Only the perpetuation of
underdevelopment can take place. This can be considered a neo-Marxist
approach.
ii) The second version is by O. Sunkel and Celso Furtado. This version does not
deny the possibility of capitalist development in the periphery. But for that,
internal constraints of the underdeveloped countries have to be removed
first. Market restrictions are among the most important of the constraints.
iii) The third approach is of Fernando Henrique Cardoso. This approach accepts
the possibility of capitalistic development in the periphery but claims that
capitalist development in the periphery will be subservient to the capitalist
development in the centre.
Let us elaborate on these approaches.
97
Theories of Sunkel combined the external factors with internal constraints to development in
Underdevelopment
order to present his own approach. Thus, like Frank and dos Santos, Sunkel
contends that the unit of analysis in studying underdevelopment cannot be the
national society. Domestic cultural and institutional factors of any particular
Latin American country are not the key variables responsible for its
backwardness though these have an important bearing. The phenomenon of
underdevelopment or backwardness can be understood only with reference to the
development of capitalist system on the world scale and the place of this
particular country in it. The world capitalist system is characterised by the
unequal but combined development of its different components. They interact
and condition each other. Industrial countries become central while
underdeveloped, backward countries become peripheral. The centre is the main
beneficiary of development because it alone has the dynamism while the
periphery also receives some benefits. Sunkel believes that development in Latin
America is possible provided the internal constraints are removed and
industrialisation based on import substitution and export diversification is
pursued. His approach is not pessimistic unlike that of Frank and dos Santos.
Celso Furtado also believes that underdevelopment is the consequence of the
development of capitalism as a world system. In Latin America, it created hybrid
structures; one part tending to behave as capitalist while the others perpetuating
the features of pre-capitalist system. Whether the capitalistic penetration in a
country of Latin America will induce industrialisation and development will
depend basically on the amount of income generated and available to the
community. To recall, in such a country, an export sector comes into existence in
order to cater to the demands of developed countries. Experience shows that the
economic structure of such a country does not undergo any big change as a result
of this capitalist penetration. There is hardly any appreciable increase in labour
absorption, and wages often have no relation with productivity.
In most of the countries which became export-oriented, ‘external demand’
became a crucial factor. If the external demand increases alongside the
improvement in the prices of export goods, the profits of the enterprises engaged
in the production and export would increase. In course of time, the relative
importance of the subsistence sector declines. There arises a possibility of
growth. This can be realized, provided there are reforms to remove internal
constraints and there is import substitution. A higher stage in underdevelopment
is reached when the industrial structure is diversified and is in a position to
produce capital goods needed for the expansion of productive capacity. This will
give a big boost to the process of growth. Thus, Celso Furtado holds that
underdevelopment is not a necessary stage in the process of formation of
capitalist economies. It occurs because of the penetration of modern capitalistic
enterprises into traditional or pre-capitalist structures. Furtado does not believe
that Latin American development is not possible without the defeat of world
98 capitalism. In this, his views are at variance with those of Frank and dos Santos.
5.4.3 The Approach of Cardoso Dependency Theories
of Underdevelopment
Finally, let us discuss the approach of Fernando Henrique Cardoso. Cardoso
holds a different view than Frank dos Santos as well as Sunkel-Furtado.
According to Cardoso, capitalist development is impossible in Latin America.
Also, he rejects the view of Latin America having dependent capitalism based on
the extensive exploitation of labour, and labour has to be paid only subsistence
wage. Third, he regards it erroneous to believe that the native or national
bourgeoisie in Latin American countries is no longer an active social force but a
parasitic class. He criticises the view that the penetration of multinational
corporations into Latin American countries have led to the development of "neo-
imperialism" and that states in those countries pursue policies that are
expansionist. Finally, it is not correct to say that Latin America is standing at the
cross-roads (at the period when he wrote) and there are only two options open to
it: (i) if it chooses to remain within the world capitalist system, its political
structure would become fascist, or (ii) if it opts out of the world capitalist system,
it can pursue the socialist path of development which will benefit the masses.
Cardoso thus comes to the conclusion that development is possible in Latin
American countries with the help of the capitalist class in the country which is
not totally subservient to the developed capitalist countries and their
multinational corporations. It needs to be underlined that relations of dependency
are useful to explain the historical roots of underdevelopment in Latin America,
but it does not follow from it that dependent relations by themselves perpetuate in
all cases the situation of underdevelopment. Cardoso, on the basis of his study of
contemporary Brazil, underlines the possibility of development.
We have considered above, three approaches to dependency theory. We have
seen that there are certain differences among the three approaches. Are there any
similarities in the three approaches? That is what we now briefly discuss. In spite
of differences there do appear some similarities in the three approaches. First, all
three approaches hold that dependency theory does a good job of explaining the
historical roots of backwardness or underdevelopment of Latin American
countries. Second, all three approaches claim that underdevelopment is not the
original state of existence. According to dependency theory, underdevelopment
has been caused by the development of capitalism in the West and the integration
of Latin American countries in the world capitalist system. Third, as a result of
the emergence of developed capitalist countries, some sort of dualism came into
existence in the world economy – the developed capitalist countries became the
centre of development, while the underdeveloped countries became the
periphery. Finally, all three approaches conclude that import substitution by itself
cannot generate the process of development in Latin America. In fact, it may lead
to greater dependence on the countries in the centre, and can even lead to
economic crises.
99
Theories of
Underdevelopment
Check Your Progress 2
Note: i) Use the space given below for your answers.
ii) Check your progress with those answers given at the end of the unit.
1) State the basic propositions of dependency theory.
………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………….
2) What are the three approaches to dependency theory in the context of Latin
America?
………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………….
102 ………………………………………………………………………………….
Dependency Theories
5.7 LET US SUM UP of Underdevelopment
In this Unit, we presented the Prebisch-Singer hypothesis which says that the
terms-of-trade of the developing countries turn downwards over time.
Subsequent to this, the Unit discussed various approaches to development by the
Latin American economists such as Andre Gunder Frank, Theotonio dos Santos,
Sunkel, Celso Furtado, and Cardoso.
Dependency theory considers development in the context of the global economy.
It divides countries into two groups: countries of the advanced capitalist world,
which form the ‘centre’, and countries of the developing world, the Third World,
that forms the ‘periphery’. The periphery is in a relationship of dependence on
the core or the centre.
The basic conclusion or policy prescription of dependency theory is that the
‘periphery’ countries should minimize their engagement with developed
countries. Through unequal exchange with the developed countries of the
‘centre’, the underdeveloped countries do not have any prospects of coming out
of a state of underdevelopment. In other words, underdevelopment will be
perpetuated if they trade with the developed countries. Thus, unlike the linear
theories and the structural theories, the dependency theory is more of a
‘diagnosis’ of the state of underdevelopment and a suggestion of getting out of
the current situation. Thus, unlike the linear and structural theories, dependency
theory does not predict or claim that the developing economies will pass through
certain stages and go towards a better outcome. Further, dependency theory
claims that if the developing economies continue with the current situation (when
the theory was formulated), they will stay underdeveloped and in a ‘dependency’
relationship with the advanced countries.
104
BLOCK 3
LAND LABOUR
AND
CREDIT MARKETS
BLOCK INTRODUCTION
The present Block, the third of this course, is titled Land Labour and Credit
Markets. It discusses, as the title of the block suggests, some factor markets in
developing nations. The emphasis is on factor markets in rural areas of these
nations. It discusses how rural factor markets function, whether markets are
complete and whether different factor markets are sometimes interlinked.
You will get a chance to compare how rural factor markets in developing
countries function, as depicted in the units of this block with how markets
function, as depicted in the microeconomics courses you studied earlier.
The Block has three units, titled Land Markets (unit 6), Labour markets
(unit 7) and Credit Markets (unit 8). The first Unit discusses theories
distribution of land ownership; land reforms and its effect on productivity;
contractual relationships between tenants and landlords; as well as the
important topic of land acquisition. The next unit deals with important
aspects of the characteristics, structure and functioning of labour markets.
It discusses and assesses different theories of wage determination and
employment. It also discusses the link between nutritional status and
productivity, and discusses the efficiency-wage hypothesis, and presents a
theory of nutritional status. The final unit of the block (unit 8) on credit
markets discusses several crucial topics on credit markets. It discusses
characteristics of credit markets; Demand and Supply of credit; whether the
rural poor have access to credit; size and structure of the Indian credit market;
informational problems in the rural credit markets. It also discusses topics like
informational problems in the credit contract and in this, explains the lenders’
risk hypothesis. The unit discusses the problem of the possible risk of loan
default, and also discusses credit rationing. Finally, the unit discusses credit
policy, as well as the important topic of whether rural factor markets are
interlinked.
UNIT 6 LAND MARKETS
Land Markets
Structure
6.0 Objectives
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Ownership and distribution of land
6.2.1 Land rental contracts
6.2.1.1 Contractual forms
6.2.1.2 Contracts and incentives
6.2.1.3 Incentive problem
6.2.2 Risk, tenancy and sharecropping
6.2.3 Other considerations to forms of tenancy
6.2.4 Land contracts and eviction
6.3 Land size and productivity
6.3.1 Key concepts
6.3.2 Land sales
6.3.3 Land reforms
6.4 Land Acquisition
6.4.1 Land Acquisition & compensation
6.4.2 Hold out problem
6.4.3 Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (LARR) Act 2015
6.5 Let Us Sum Up
6.6 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises
6.0 OBJECTIVES
This unit discusses about land markets and lands rental contracts that exist in the
land markets. We will also discuss about the two main forms of contracts:
sharecropping and fixed-rent tenancy. Sharecropping and fixed-rent tenancy are
the two extreme forms of land contact and can be used in different variations. We
will then look at the incentive problem and compare the two types of contracts in
different scenarios like risk, uncertainty, improper insurance markets, double-
incentive problem etc. We will also introduce some important concepts of land
markets that can help in the redistribution of land, i.e., eviction, land reforms and
land acquisition.
Dr. Indrani Roy Chowdhury, Associate Professor, CSRD, JNU, New Delhi
107
Land Labour and After going through this unit, you will be able to explain:
Credit Markets
How do different land rental contracts address the issue of unequal
distribution of land?
What are the main types of land rental contracts, and how do they react to the
different economic environments?
What leads to inefficient market outcomes in a given tenancy contract?
Are small landowners more productive than large landowners, and what are
the factors that determine the productivity of the land.
What is the role of land reforms in determining land productivity?
What is Land acquisition and which are the some critical issues related to
land acquisition and compensation?
6.1 INTRODUCTION
Land, along with labour and capital, is an important factor of production. Land
markets, therefore, form an integral part of an economy. However, the land is
different from other factors of production since it is finite and immovable in
nature. It is the ownership rights (property rights) of land that are bought and sold
in exchange for money in the factor market. Land markets can be both formal and
informal. Formal land markets are those where the transfer or exchange of land is
formally recognized by legal institutions and officially registered. Informal land
markets, on the other hand, constitute transactions that do not conform to the
legal procedures. They might be considered legitimate in some less developed
societies. The existence of informal markets makes it difficult to set up efficient
and effective land markets where the transfer of land follows the formal
procedures (Mahoney et al., 2007).
Like all other factor markets, which we will be studying in the subsequent units,
land markets facilitate the mismatches in the demand and supply of land. In
developing countries like India, the distribution of land is unequal, with a high
concentration of land in the hands of a few. A large number of individuals have
little or no land with them. The unequal distribution of land also depicts the
unequal distribution of wealth since land is the main form in which individuals
store their wealth (Raj, 1970). Since the rate of depreciation of land and hence
‘the cost of holding’ is low, it provides more security. Moreover, the land is also
a source of rent if leased out to somebody else. In most agrarian economies, this
type of “land rental market” is common where some or all the land is leased by
the landlord to tenants. The land is leased or rented in exchange for rent or share
of output produced by the tenant. We will learn about land ownership and its
distribution in the subsequent sections.
108
Land Markets
6.2 OWNERSHIP AND DISTRIBUTION OF LAND
In developing countries like Asia and Latin America, the distribution of land is
highly unequal, with a large share of land in the hands of few people. In Asia, on
the whole, 84.5% of tenanted land is under share tenancy. But the percentage
range from around 30% (Thailand) through 50% (India) or 60% (Indonesia), all
the way up to 90% in Bangladesh. In Latin America, on average, 16.1% of
tenanted land is under sharecropping; the corresponding percentages are much
lower: under 10% in countries such as Costa Rica or Uruguay and negligible in
Peru, although relatively high at 50% in Colombia.
Thus, a significant proportion of the population is either landless or owns a very
small amount of landholding. Both the situations of ‘inequality in land holdings’
and ‘low per capita land holding’ lead to similar conditions where the owner
itself cultivates a significant share of his/her land. On the other hand, very large
farmers with large plots of land may use hired labour for cultivation. In the areas
where property rights are weakly defined, land may be owned and cultivated by a
group of people or communities. Some areas of Latin America have even moved
away from the tenancy system and provided ownership and land-use rights to the
tenants who have been cultivating the land for a long period. These countries
follow the principle that the tenants who cultivate the land should be granted
ownership and use rights as well. However, this type of principle may lead to the
displacement of tenancy by ‘large-scale mechanized farming.
The practice of tenancy exists in many parts of the world, but there are some
variations in the form of tenancy. The two types of tenancy are fixed-rent tenancy
and sharecropping.
Fixed-Rent Tenancy: In this form of a tenancy, the tenant pays a fixed
amount of money to the landlord and gets the right to farm the land in return.
Rich tenants are more likely to take up this type of tenancy. In fixed-rent
tenancy, the landlord is relieved of all risk: the fixed rent is to be paid
whether the production does well or not. It is, therefore, necessary that the
tenant is willing to take the risks of bad crops or crop failures. Since rich
tenants engage in this form of tenancy, they have enough wealth to face such
risks. There is indirect evidence that Latin American tenancies are held by
large farmers. Contrast this with Asia, where the bulk of tenancy is in the
form of sharecropping.
Sharecropping: In this form of tenancy, the tenant shares the fraction of the
crop produced as rent to the landlord. The importance of sharecropping is
particularly realized when the tenants are small and risk-averse. Since they
have to pay a fraction of produce as rent, they can deal with the fluctuations
in the output. In other words, part of the fluctuation or risk can be shared with
the landlord. The Asian tenancy probably reflects, on the whole, land leases
from relatively large landowners to relatively small landowners.
109
Land Labour and Let us now look at the land rental contracts in some more detail.
Credit Markets
6.2.1 Land Rental Contracts
6.2.1.1 Contractual Farms
There are many different types of contracts that a landlord can use to rent out
his/her land to somebody else for cultivation. The first one is a fixed-rent contract
in which the landlord rents the land in exchange for some rent. The landlord can
charge the rent monthly, yearly or seasonally. Another form of contact is
sharecropping. There can be different forms of sharecropping, but the main idea
behind this form of contract is that the tenant shares the output with the landlord
in some pre-decided proportion. Along with different variations in the proportion
in which the crop is divided, the input costs might also be shared in some cases.
For example, the landlord may give some money to the tenant for purchasing
inputs in the form of credit or in lieu of the output that the landlord purchases
from the tenant at discounted prices. This type of contract is also referred to as an
interlinked contract, which we will learn in unit 8 in detail.
We can write an equation representing different forms of rental contracts with
fixed rent and sharecropping as special cases. Equation 1 gives us the total rent
R, where Y denotes agricultural output produced o the leased land.
𝑅 = 𝛼𝑌+𝐹
In this equation, if 𝛼 = 0 and F > 0, it represents fixed rent contact where R =
F.
If F = 0 and 𝛼 lies between 0 and 1, then it is a sharecropping contract. Here,
𝛼 is the share given to the landlord and 1-𝛼is the share to the tenant.
If 𝛼 = 0 and F<0, it represents a “pure wage contract”, and the wage -F is
paid to the tenant. However, the tenant, in this case, is a labourer that works
on the landlord’s land.
6.2.1.2 Contracts and Incentives
It is often argued that sharecropping is an inferior land contractual form
compared to fixed-rent tenancy. It is also referred to as Marshallian inefficiency
and is connected with the appropriate provision of incentives to the tenant. In
simple words, fixed-rent contracts ensure that the landlord gets a fixed rent
irrespective of the output produced. On the other hand, the tenant has to give a
fixed amount of money and gets to keep all the extra output produced. Contrary
to this, a tenant has only a proportion of the output in the case of sharecropping.
Only a share of extra output produced is retained by the tenant. In situations,
where the tenant cannot be monitored or controlled, he/she has an incentive to
reduce the effort they put in. It is also argued why is the tenant allowed to keep
100% output and not more, say 120%. Or why shouldn’t we charge a high fixed
rent instead of sharecropping and allow the tenant to keep the remaining output?
These cases are also inefficient and will lead to an oversupply of efforts. Let us
look at the Marshallian inefficiency argument in some detail in order to
110 understand these cases.
Land Markets
We assume that there is only one variable input of production, i.e., the tenant’s
labour. Figure 6.1 shows the production function (OA) representing diminishing
returns to a factor (i.e., labour used on a rented plot of land). Labour is costly to a
tenant and has other uses as well. A tenant can work as a wage labourer on
somebody else’s land or simply value leisure more than work. Therefore, the cost
of labour is represented by the curve OB (cost of production). The surplus
produced in this case is given by the difference between the value of output
(production curve) and the cost of producing the output (production cost curve).
The tenant will always try to maximize his/her surplus and hence the difference
between the two curves. The maximum surplus is obtained at the point L*. At L*,
the marginal product of labour (given by the tangent of the production curve) is
equal to the marginal cost of production (constant cost in this case). CD is the
maximum surplus obtained. A
B
C
Production Function
Output Costs
Production Costs
O
L* Labour
Fig. 6.1: Production, Cost and Economic Surplus
6.2.1.3 Incentive problem
As discussed earlier, a tenant will not maximize the surplus until and unless
given an appropriate incentive to do so. The tenant will do so if the maximization
of the surplus is in his/her interest. It is also known as the incentive problem.
Fig. 6.2 illustrates the case of sharecropping. Since the tenant only gets a share of
output, the production function is given by the curve OE. Note that OE is simply
a fraction of the curve OA (the original production curve multiplied by the share
of output with the tenant). The curve not only shifts downwards but is also flatter
than the previous production function. In this scenario, the tenant will maximize
the gap OB, which is nothing but the difference between the new production
curve and the cost curve. The surplus is maximized at the point 𝐿̂ , which is
smaller than the actual marginal product L*. Hence the tenant undersupplies the
labour. 111
A
Output Costs
Production Function
Production Costs
O
𝐋̅ 𝐋* Labour
B
Output Costs
Fixed Rent
E
C
O
O- L* Labour
B
Output Costs
Fixed Rent
C
O
O- 𝐋̅ Labour
Fig. 6.4: Why Marginal Returns to a Tenant Should not Exceed 100%?
113
Land Labour and
Credit Markets
Check Your Progress 1
Note: i) Use the space given below for your answers.
ii) Check your progress with those answers given at the end of the unit.
1) What is the difference between fixed- rent tenancy and share cropping?
………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………….
2) What is the crux of the Marshallian inefficiency argument?
………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………………………………………
114
Land Markets
This gives us the share of production given to the landlord in the case of
sharecropping. Since the landlord gets the same return in both the contacts, we
need to look at the returns of the tenants. In a good situation, the tenants get
𝐺 − 𝑅 in case of a fixed-rent contract and (1 − 𝑠)𝐺 in sharecropping. Hence the
difference between the returns from fixed-rent and share cropping contracts is:
(1 − 𝑠)𝐺 − (𝐺 − 𝑅)
Using the value of s derived above and the fact that G > B, we get,
𝐺𝑅
(1 − 𝑠)𝐺 − (𝐺 − 𝑅) = 𝑅 − 𝑠𝐺 = 𝑅 − <0
𝑝𝐺 + (1 − 𝑝)𝐵
This shows that in good situations, sharecropping contracts will reduce the
returns of the tenant. We can similarly derive the case for a bad state. The returns
to the tenant in sharecropping will increase in the bad situations as compared to
the returns in fixed-rent contracts. Considering the two types of contracts
(sharecropping and fixed-rent) as two different projects, we can conclude from
the above results that a risk-averse tenant will choose a sharecropping contract.
Even if the landlord increases the share taken from the tenant, the tenant will still
prefer sharecropping. Furthermore, sharecropping can allow the tenant to share
not only the output but also the risk associated with uncertain production. On the
contrary, a tenant will have to bear all the risks in the case of fixed-rent.
One might argue that if we want to reduce or eliminate tenants’ risk, why stick to
sharecropping. Fixed wage payments equal to the tenant’s share in the case of
sharecropping can be more beneficial. The tenant will be better off as compared
to the previous situation. Therefore, when there are large and risk-neutral
landowners and poor and risk-averse tenants, the tenancy will be replaced by
wage employment. Note that we have taken the landlord to be risk-neutral. If
both the landlord and the tenant are risk-averse, then neither fixed-rent contracts
nor wage contracts will help. The only option then will be sharecropping. There
is also an incentive problem in the case of fixed-wage contracts. In the absence of
supervision, the tenant will have fewer incentives to put in the required efforts.
Hence, to ensure efficiency, fixed contract is a better option. A wage contract, on
the other hand, will be beneficial for insuring the tenant from uncertainty.
Imagine a situation where we only have fixed-rental contracts and fixed-wage
contracts. Both the landlord and the tenant can decide on their exposure to
efficiency and insurance through diversification. The landlord can use hired
labour for production on the part of their land and lease out the other part for
some fixed rent. On the other hand, tenants can work for some time as wage
labour for a fixed income and take land on rent for the remaining time. However,
this kind of diversification is criticized for three reasons.
The first reason is the monitoring problem. Fixed-rent contracts can be good
for incentives, whereas wage contracts can be bad for incentives. The
115
Land Labour and superiority of the combination of these two contracts over sharecropping will
Credit Markets
highly depend on the ability of the landlord to monitor the labour.
Combining the two contracts may be difficult in reality. The structure of the
labour market plays an essential role in it. Peak seasons may require full-time
labourers, and those employed in full time paid labour, will not be able to
cultivate the land taken on rent.
Different forms of uncertainties that can affect the wage rate are also
neglected.
118
minimum amount of land is used. The use of machines like tractors, threshers and Land Markets
pumps for irrigation will provide economies of scale on large sizes of land
as compared to that required for animal power. Therefore, technology can
increase productivity if a certain minimum size of the land is used and favours
large land sizes in the case of highly mechanized cultivation.
Imperfect Insurance Markets: As we have seen earlier, labourers and
tenants are not risk-neutral in the real world. Neither the credit markets nor the
insurance markets are perfect. Had there been perfect credit markets (free
from limited liability) and perfect insurance markets (or risk-neutral landlords
and tenants), production efficiency could be achieved by choosing appropriate
contracts. It is not possible in the case of imperfect markets with risk-
aversion and credit-constraint tenants. These conditions, however, favour the
ownership of small lands that are farmed by family labour. They ensure
productivity advantages and efficiency gains that cannot be achieved by a
tenancy contract with fixed rent or hired labour.
Imperfect Labour Markets: Labour markets, like the land markets, are
also imperfect, more so in the case of unemployment. Let us assume that there is
full employment in the labour market. The opportunity cost to the landlord
applying a unit of labour on the land will be the wage rate of a unit of labour
prevailing in the market. The opportunity cost will be the same in case of
hired labour or family labour (his/her own labour). But the situation is
different if there is unemployment in the labour market. The opportunity cost
of hired labour is still the same (wage rate in the market). However, the
opportunity cost is lower in the case of family labour. It will depend on whether
the family knows that it can get a job or not. If they know that they can get a
job, then the opportunity cost is equal to the market wage. But if they know
that they cannot get a job, the opportunity cost will be zero. Figure 5 shows
the per-acre production function to show these cases. Small farmers who use
family labour have a low opportunity cost of labour since there is a possibility
of unemployment. He will therefore put in L** units of labour per acre (here
MP = MC of their labour). Large farmers who use hired labour on their
farms will employ less labour per acre (L*). Therefore, the output produced
per acre by small farmers will be higher than that of large farmers.
Output per Acre
124
Land Markets
There are two problems with this: The problems of ascertaining market values of
acquired plots (misclassification) and incorporating other relevant characteristics.
It is highly debatable how much higher should the compensation be? LARR Bill
in Parliament sets compensation at an arbitrary multiple (quadruple) of market
value in rural areas. Let us elaborate on these points.
A piece of land to its owner is not some tangible attribute and therefore has a lot
of subjective quantity. So there exists substantial heterogeneity among owners in
the valuation of land. The land value is derived not only from the flow of crop
output alone but also because farmers differ in their endowments of skill,
knowledge, capital, farming assets like bullocks or tractors, market access, and
access to alternative methods of earning a livelihood etc. Moreover, in the rural
region, land has an important role as a financial asset, often serves as collateral
for loans, offers an assured source of employment for family labour, and acts as
insurance against food price fluctuations via self-consumption. All this adds up to
the intrinsic value of the land. Besides this, another potential source of value for
land is the social prestige attached to land ownership. Thus, different owners are
likely to impute these values very differently.
The land market in rural areas in developing countries (as well as India) is very
thin and opaque due to very few transactions. Distress sales constitute a bulk of
the rural land transactions, and the full value is often concealed to escape stamp
duty. Rural areas generally have poor and very old land records, and transactions
are not well documented, leaving considerable room for officials to manipulate
the figure using selective sampling or fake transactions. Therefore, it is not easy
to get a proper estimate of the market value of land in rural areas. It is relatively
less in the urban land market, where the transactions are quite frequent. Any
industrial or development project will cause a significant appreciation in real
estate prices, making it impossible for displaced farmers to buy back land with
compensation money if they so wished.
There is also criticism against cash compensation. The land has a property of
indivisibility and is therefore relatively less prone to erosion over time (compared
with divisible financial assets such as cash or bank deposits with easy withdrawal
facilities) since there is a minimum size of a plot that can be transacted, owing to
fixed transaction costs. Moreover, cash possession is risky for a poor household.
It is subjective to temptation for them to indulge in temporary consumption needs
or difficulty of denying help to relatives or friends when asked for. Thus, the
common criticism of cash compensation is that it replaces a familiar asset (land)
with an unfamiliar one (paper assets), destroying the value of the farmer’s asset-
specific skills and leaving him vulnerable to bad investments or temptations or
self-control problems associated with liquid wealth.
125
Land Labour and
Credit Markets
6.4.2 Holdout Problem
In India, various reports in Quartz India suggest that land acquisition issues have
delayed around 9 billion dollars worth of projects in India. Barapullah Ph III,
across the Jamuna River bridge of 3.5 km long, was delayed for 18 months to
acquire two plots of land of 8.5 acres. 20 % of the unfinished work holds up 100
% work of the flyover. The owners of the two plots were demanding very high
compensation.
A holdout is a form of monopoly power that potentially arises in the course of
land acquisition where a big chunk of land is required for a project (like
infrastructure, industry, mining extraction, urban housing etc.). Once acquisition
begins, individual owners, knowing their land is essential to the completion of
the project, can hold out for prices in excess of their opportunity costs. The result
is that such large-scale projects requiring acquisition will entail high bargaining
and transaction costs.
It is difficult to agree on a price for land that is fair to all the stakeholders, given
that land is a special asset with a fixed supply and very high attachment and
emotional value and that agricultural landowners have very few alternative
means of livelihood. Many countries, including the US and India, have therefore
promulgated ‘eminent domain’ laws that allow land acquisition for public
purposes on payment of fair compensation. Yet the problem persists, thereby
fuelling research geared towards understanding what determines a fair
compensation and redistribution package.
127
Land Labour and Survey of Wasteland: The government must conduct a survey of its wasteland
Credit Markets
and maintain a record of the same.
Compensation and R&R provisions of 13 types of projects (such as the
National Highways Act, 1956 and the Railways Act, 1989) are exempted
from the provisions of the Act. Compensation and R&R provisions of Acts
are in consonance with the Act.
Return of Unutilized Land: The period after which unutilized land has to be
returned will be the latter of (i) five years or (ii) any period specified at the
time of setting up the project.
Retrospective Application: In calculating the time period for retrospective
application, any period during which the proceedings were held up: (i) due to
stay order of a court, or (ii) for a period specified in the award of a Tribunal, or
(iii) for any period where possession was taken but the compensation is lying
deposited in a court or any designated account, will not be counted.
128
Land Markets
However, despite being inefficient, sharecropping can be an equilibrium
outcome. This is because of the existence of risk and uncertainty along with
imperfect insurance markets. Other considerations in the tenancy contract like the
double-incentive problem, limited liability, cost-sharing of inputs and screening
and the role of sharecropping in these situations have also been discussed. The
land rental contract section at the end talked about evictions that a landlord can
use as a threat at the time of contract renewal.
We also talked about land size and productivity and the impact of unequal land
distribution on land productivity. Some important concepts discussed in this
regard include productivity, technology, imperfect insurance markets, imperfect
labour markets and pooling of land. This section further discussed briefly the role
of land reforms in the distribution of land and hence.
We then moved on to a critical question of land acquisition – What should be the
correct price of land that should be paid as compensation? The holdout problem -
a form of monopoly power that potentially arises in the course of land acquisition
where a big chunk of land is required for a project was discussed. Finally, we
studied about the land acquisition acts in India, the Land Acquisition,
Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act and its salient features.
129
Land Labour and
Credit Markets
UNIT 7 LABOUR MARKETS
Structure
7.0 Objectives
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Characteristics and Challenges of Labour Markets
7.2.1 Characteristics of Labour Markets
7.2.2 Challenges of Labour Markets
7.3 Basic Theory of Wage Determination
7.4 Alternative Theories of Wage Determination
7.4.1 Imperfect Information Model
7.4.2 Repeated Games Model
7.5 Poverty, Nutrition and Labour Markets
7.5.1 Basic Model with Piece Rates
7.5.2 Nutrition, Time and Casual Labour Markets
7.6 A Model of Nutritional Status
7.7 Let Us Sum Up
7.8 Hints to Check Your Progress Exercises
7.0 OBJECTIVES
After going through this unit, you will be able to explain:
describe the features of the labour market in the context of developing
countries;
explain how wages are determined in a standard labour market;
derive the conditions under which equilibrium between wage and output is
reached;
discuss the explanation that is offered by the neo-classical paradigm
regarding the existence of unemployment; and
examine the link between nutrition and work capacity and consequently the
wages received by workers.
Dr.Indrani Roy Chowdhury, Associate Professor, CSRD, JNU, New Delhi.
130
Labour Markets
7.1 INTRODUCTION
In the previous unit, we looked at the operations of the land market. Land
markets emerge because of the imbalance between the endowments of land.
Similarly, the differences in the endowments of labour give rise to the labour
market. In a perfect labour market, the supply and demand for labour interact to
determine the price of labour (wage or salary). However, in the real-world
scenario, the factor markets, including labour markets, do not work perfectly.
Developing countries are mostly endowed with a surplus labour force that does
not have gainful employment and is seeking alternative sources of employment.
Thus, from the developing countries’ perspective, labour markets play a central
role in determining economic and social progress because employment status is
one of the key determinants of poverty. However, in most developing countries, a
formal sector in the labour market is narrow. It fails to create adequate jobs that
pay well for its working population. Their labour markets tend to be
characterized by the dominance of workers in the subsistence agriculture.
Consequently, there is persistence of informality in employment contracts, with
low pay and poor working conditions. It is a matter of concern that development
and economic growth in many developing countries, especially in South Asia and
Africa, have led to highly segmented labour markets both in their rural and urban
areas. Furthermore, there are large variations in wages within a narrow
geographic region despite the presence of competition.
In low-income countries, most of the working population is either self-employed
or engaged in family work. Hence, concerns of job security, minimum wages,
and other regulations, are generally not applicable. The same applies even in
middle-income countries like Morocco where only half of the workforce are
wage employees. Even in the more structured parts of developing country’s
labour markets, compliance of labour laws is a formidable challenge. This is
because these countries are often endowed with weak institutions, which provoke
low compliance and costly processes to ensure enforcement. Hence, in most
developing countries, between a quarter and a half of wage-earners receive less
than the statutory minimum wage. Moreover, policy prescriptions for poor
countries are often self-contradictory. Given these, massive non-compliance is
the norm in many developing countries. Regulations like a national minimum
wage simply encourage the expansion of an informal market.
Further, there is a growing tendency of informalization of the formal sector. This
has resulted in newer forms of labour market duality through casual and sub-
contract labour. Another key challenge witnessed in all developing countries is
gender disparities in the labour market. Women tend to be over-represented in
informal employment. They face a range of barriers to access better jobs in the
formal economy. For this reason, when women do work, they are more likely to
be family or domestic workers and less likely to be working in the formal
131
Land Labour and economy. Persistence of gender wage gaps reflect the penalty that women bear
Credit Markets
due to their compulsion to withdraw from the labour force to raise children.
Because of high population growth rates, developing countries face the challenge
of creating adequate jobs for young people who enter the labour market in large
numbers. A high rate of prevalence of youth unemployment and
underemployment are common in developing countries. This is not only because
of demand-side deficits (inadequate job opportunities) but also because they lack
skills, work experience, job search abilities and the financial resources to find
employment. As a result, youth unemployment rates tend to be two to three
times higher than for adults. Furthermore, youths have been affected by the
global financial crisis more severely than adults. This is due to the sectors they
tend to work in and their vulnerability to layoffs. Global figures show that
almost 75 million young people (between the ages of 15 and 24) are unemployed
as of 2012, reflecting an unemployment rate of 12.7 per cent (ILO, 2012).
132
Labour Markets
Poor working conditions, wage gaps, gender discrimination, child labour, lack of
social security etc. are common i.e. while finding a job itself is a challenge,
having one does not guarantee decent living conditions.
Besides the above characteristics, a considerable share of the economic activities
is outside the ambit of the market altogether (e.g., subsistence farming, street
vending, etc.). They are indicative of an “employment-led” survivalist strategy,
rather than a “growth-led” demand for labour. The distinction here is that in
developed countries it is “growth” or “demand” which absorbs labour into jobs.
In contrast, in the developing countries, it is an abundance of underemployed
supply of labour seeking to create its own demand for its services.
134
Labour Markets
135
Land Labour and
Credit Markets
136
Labour Markets
have on the worker effort, motivation, cost of fresh recruitment, retention, etc.
All of these cumulatively affect the ultimate firm’s profits. Thus, although the
efficiency wage theory explains the existence of wage differential across sectors,
they do not explain why higher wages lead to lower labour costs. To conclude,
the following points on ‘efficiency wage’ may be underlined:
higher wages help reduce shirking when the effort is not perfectly observed;
higher wages improve worker morale and effort like the effect of a ‘gift
exchanged’;
higher wages reduce worker quits and thereby the turnover costs;
higher wages attract more applicants and increases the hiring power of firms.
139
Land Labour and If the worker shirks, then the worker will produce high output with probability
Credit Markets
p. In this case, the same effort-supply decision will arise in the next period. If
the worker produces low output with probability (1 – p), the firm will offer w = 0.
This means, the worker is fired and will be self-employed thereafter. Thus, if it is
optimal for a worker to shirk, then the (expected) present value of the worker’s
payoffs (𝑉𝑠 )in two periods is:
𝑤
𝑉𝑠 = 𝑤 ∗ + 𝛿 [𝑝𝑉𝑠 + (1 − 𝑝) 1−𝛿
𝑜
]
(1 − 𝛿)𝑤 ∗ + 𝛿(1 − 𝑝)𝑤𝑜
𝑉𝑠 =
(1 − 𝛿𝑝)(1 − 𝛿)
Selecting the optimal effort level for a worker, therefore, involves comparing the
lifetime utility when shirking with the lifetime utility when not shirking. Thus, it
is optimal for the worker to supply effort if the payoff from putting effort exceeds
the payoff from shirking (𝑉𝑒 > 𝑉𝑠 ). Hence:
The RHS of (B) is lower than (A). Thus, in order to induce the worker to put his
effort, the firm has to offer higher 𝑤 ∗ in (A) i.e. when 0 < 𝑝 < 1 as compared to
(B) i.e. the case where p = 0. Thus, in equilibrium, firms have neither any
incentive to raise wages (workers provide effort e, and firms can hire all labour
they want at w∗); nor to lower wages (as lower wages imply shirking and losses).
Job seekers strictly prefer work to self-employment or unemployment. They
140
Labour Markets
would be happy to work at w∗ or lower but cannot credibly commit not to shirk at
w <w∗ and are thus not hired.
Key Results: Key results that flow from the above analysis are: (i) presence of
involuntary unemployment, and (ii) wage rigidity (i.e. wage cuts by individual
firms will only become attractive as the unemployment pool gradually grows).
From the welfare perspective, this means: (i) equilibrium in the shirking model
is not Pareto efficient, (ii) sources of inefficiency i.e. each firm employs too few
workers because it faces the private cost of hiring with w∗level of wages rather
than the social cost level i.e. e < w∗,(iii) there are negative externalities i.e. each
hiring firm raises Vu (voluntary unemployment) for all other firms and
consequently (iv) unemployment is inefficiently high. With a simple and
sensible set of assumptions (workers choose effort, firms cannot monitor them
costlessly), this theory can potentially explain a key set of stylized facts that the
competitive paradigm could not address. Hence:
it became very influential generating a huge amount of literature;
it introduced into labour economics a set of tools that feature prominently in
job search models; and
has the limitation that individuals being ‘rational cheaters’ can only be
motivated by carrot (wages) and stick (firing).
Alternative efficiency wage models offer similar predictions but with different
assumptions on human behaviour.
141
Land Labour and the period under review. The curve, therefore, links different nutrition levels to
Credit Markets
the corresponding levels of work capacity generated by the individual.
142
Labour Markets
143
Land Labour and
Credit Markets
148
Labour Markets
7.8 HINTS TO CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
EXERCISES
Check Your Progress 1
1) Decent work, youth unemployment, environment.
2) At the point where the supply and the demand curves intersect.
149
Land Labour and
Credit Markets
UNIT 8 CREDIT MARKET
Structure
8.0 Objectives
8.1 Introduction
8.2 Characteristics of Credit Markets
8.3 Demand for and Supply of Credit
8.3.1 Demand for Credit
8.3.2 Supply of Credit
8.4 Size and Structure of Indian Credit Market
8.5 Imperfect Information and Formal Credit Market
8.5.1 Adverse Selection
8.5.2 Ex Ante Moral Hazard
8.5.3 Ex Post Moral Hazard
8.6 Imperfect Information and Informal Credit Market
8.6.1 Lender’s Risk Hypothesis
8.6.2 Default and Fixed Capital Loans
8.6.3 Default and Collateral
8.6.4 Default and Credit Rationing
8.6.5 Default and Enforcement
8.7 Policies on Credit
8.7.1 Vertical Formal-Informal Links
8.7.2 Microfinance
8.7.3 Grameen Bank
8.8 Inter-linkages among Rural Factor Markets
8.9 Let Us Sum Up
8.10 Hints to Check Your Progress Exercises
8.0 OBJECTIVES
In this Unit, we highlight the characteristics, size and structure of the credit
market. We will then look at the profile and properties of buyers and sellers,
especially in the case of rural credit markets. The Unit also provides some
insights into different sources of credit. It further provides a deeper
understanding of the informational problems and credit contracts followed by
policies related to credit markets. The last section tries to link the credit market
with other rural factor markets, i.e., land and labour.
Contributed by Ms. Mamta, Research Scholar, CSRD, JNU, New Delhi
150
After going through this unit, you will be able to: Credit Market
8.1 INTRODUCTION
Economic theories have emphasized the positive association between access to
financial services and economic growth and development. Access to financial
services is intermediated by financial institutions such as banks. Development of
financial instruments, markets and institutions ameliorate the problems of
information, enforcement and transaction costs. In an economy, how effectively
the financial system reduces the information, enforcement, and transaction costs
will influence the (i) savings rate, (ii) investment decisions, (iii) technological
innovations, and (iv) growth rate.
In a credit-starved developing economy, financial intermediaries actually bridge
the gap between supply and demand, thereby boosting economic activity,
productivity, and growth. However, the performance of formal sector lending to
the poor is rather depressing in terms of penetration, outreach, targeting, and
repayment rates.
Poor economies are characterized mainly by seasonal fluctuations of income,
poor asset base, and savings base. Credit is critically essential in such resource
constrained rural economy because the accessibility of credit from the formal
sectors is highly skewed in the absence of collateral.
We describe below the importance of credit in an under-developed economy.
Credit market serves as intermediation between the lenders and the
borrowers. Credit market thus affects output, investment, technology choices
and inequality. It is critically important for capacity expansion (by means of
financing working capital and investment in fixed capital), particularly
among poor farmers.
The importance of credit lies in the fact that many economic activities
(production) are spread over time. For example, when a farmer invests today, 151
Land Labour and (s)he realises returns during harvest. Moreover, people’s income is subject to
Credit Markets
large seasonal fluctuations (e.g., farmer’s income due to uncertain monsoon;
or probability of losing job due to informal job contracts; etc.). The credit
market plays a great role in smoothening consumption. Moreover,
unwarranted events such as illness or wedding in the family often create a
pressing need for credit. Apart from the intrinsic benefit of being able to
withstand such shocks, the availability of credit largely reduces the inertia to
adopt better technologies and help individuals raise mean levels of income
and undertake moderate risk.
One of the stylized facts about a poor rural economy is credit rationing. It is a
situation when borrowers are unable to borrow an adequate amount (or some
borrowers are unable to borrow at all) due to lenders’ inhibition to supply
credit at the ongoing interest rate. It is particularly the case where formal
sector credit is rationed because poorer households lack sufficient assets to
put up as collateral for borrowing – a usual prerequisite for bank lending. A
significant fraction of credit transactions in underdeveloped countries occurs
in the informal sector (local moneylenders), despite serious government
efforts to channel credit directly via its own banks or by regulating
commercial banks. On an average, interest rate in the informal sector is much
higher than the interest rate in the formal sector; also it shows significant
dispersion. Siamwalla et al. (World Bank Economic Review, 1990), in a
study of rural credit markets in Thailand, found that the informal sector
interest rate could be up to 60 per cent. In contrast, the formal sector rate
ranged from 12 per cent to 14 per cent. The credit market is usually highly
segmented, marked by long-term exclusive relationships and repeat lending.
There is frequent inter-linkage with other markets, such as land, labour or
production.
Numerous case studies and empirical analyses in a variety of countries have
revealed that informal credit markets often display patterns and features not
commonly found in institutional lending: Credit markets are often subject to
market imperfections, where loans are often advanced on the basis of oral
agreements rather than written contracts, with little or no collateral. The two
crucial features that can disrupt its functioning are involuntary default and
voluntary default. The lender (who supplies credit) hands over an amount L
now, and the borrower (who demands credit) is supposed to repay an amount
L(1 + i) at a later stage, where ‘i’ is the interest rate. The borrower may be
unable to repay the loan resulting in involuntary default. There may be a
situation where the borrower strategically decides not to repay the loan. It is
known as voluntary default and often occurs when the legal system of the
credit market is weak. In developing countries, formal financial institutions
face ‘information asymmetry’ in the case of collateral-free loans. The loan
may be used for activities that involve high risk; it may also be invested in
152 activities involving zero or negative payoffs making strategic default an
attractive option for a borrower. Because of the above problems, informal Credit Market
financial institutions are better equipped with information tracking and better
enforcement than the formal sector because of their local network.
The stylized features of the credit market of a rural economy will be discussed in
detail in the subsequent sections.
Credit is demanded for different types of activities. The demand for credit can
broadly be put under three categories.
154
a) Fixed Capital – Credit is demanded for starting new businesses or expanding Credit Market
the existing production lines. Fixed capital is required for purchase and repair
of durable inputs like machines, factories and warehouses.
b) Working Capital – Credit is demanded for supporting the ongoing
production activity. The need for credit can arise because of substantial time
lag between the investment required for production and sales receipts. For
example, a trader who buys crops from farmers might give some money (in
the form of credit) to purchase inputs like seeds, fertilisers, pesticides, etc.
Credit advances are deducted from the price that the trader will pay while
purchasing the crops produced.
Consumption Credit – This type of credit is usually demanded by poor
individuals mainly for consumption smoothing. Individuals may need money
either because of sudden downturns in their production or a sudden decrease in
the prices they get for their produce. Individuals engaged in seasonal work may
need credit to meet consumption during out of work season. They might also
need credit for catastrophic expenditure due to illness, death or festivities like
wedding. The demand for consumption credit forms the basis for the demand for
insurance. A group of individuals who face sudden loss (due to, for example,
crop failure, theft, fire or illness) can create demand for insurance.
Market for fixed capital is crucial for the overall growth of an economy, but
markets for working capital and consumption expenditure are equally important
for a poor agrarian economy. These are important for the agriculture sector
mainly because of the seasonality factor and the low incomes of the stakeholders.
For instance, a farmer may need working capital at the beginning of the crop
cycle for purchasing various inputs. It is difficult for small and marginal farmers
to bear the combined cost of all the inputs, and hence they need credit. The loan
is repaid after the crop is harvested and sold. This process usually happens
repetitively with every crop cycle. Agriculture also has uncertainty attached to
the production process. A crop failure or drop in prices of crops in the market due
to over-underproduction can create temporary hardships. Moreover, the peasants
or landless labourers might face fluctuations in their earnings over the year. They
attempt to smoothen such fluctuations in income by resorting to credit.
the project chosen by the borrower and the level of effort the borrower will put
into the project. This sort of scenario is called information asymmetry.
Let us try to formalise this issue in a credit transaction. We consider two agents:
a borrower and a lender. The borrower has a project, but no money to finance it;
and she has to depend on the lender. Information related problems arise due to
the lender’s inability to verify either the borrower’s characteristics (e.g., nature of
the project and the risk involved) or the borrower’s effort in utilizing the loans on
the project for which the loan has been procured. Further, with infrequent
transactions, credit history and reputation are weak for the rural poor. The
absence of collateral and weak legal enforcement mechanism, coupled with
limited liability, often accentuates the problem. This information asymmetry can
be classified into three groups:
1) Adverse Selection: This is a problem due to the hidden characteristics of
borrowers. The lender may not have reliable information about the ‘quality of
the borrowers’ and their risk-taking behaviour (i.e., whether the borrower is a
good/safe or a bad/risky borrower). This issue was first highlighted by
George Akerlof in 1970 as the famous “market for lemons problem” (lemon
in this context means goods of poor quality). The information asymmetry is
due to the fact that transaction costs of monitoring the borrowers and
enforcement of legal actions may be costly.
2) Ex Ante Moral Hazard: This problem is due to the hidden actions of the
borrowers after the disbursal of credit and before the return of the project is
realized. This problem arises as a result of limited information and
uncertainties about the usage of borrowed money.
3) Ex Post Moral Hazard: This sort of problem arises due to the hidden actions
of the borrowers after the project starts giving returns. The lender may have
limited information about the size of the returns realized by the borrower. In
such a scenario, it is tempting for the borrower to under-report (i.e., report a
lower figure) the profitability of the project and announce a loss in order to
escape the repayment of a loan. The strategic default is an outcome in the
face of limited liability on the part of the borrower.
161
Land Labour and
Credit Markets 8.6 IMPERFECT INFORMATION AND INFORMAL
CREDIT MARKET
Interest rate can sometimes be exorbitantly high in the informal credit market.
One of the reasons for this could be the exclusive monopoly enjoyed by the
informal money lender. The interest rate charged could be higher than the
opportunity cost, i.e., the interest rate charged by the formal credit market.
However, there are two problems worth mentioning. First, the informal lender
can have only a ‘local monopoly’ with certain limitations. Secondly, the lender
would choose profits in different forms while keeping the interest rate
comparatively low. Let us discuss the informational problems associated with
different forms of credit contracts.
Suppose the probability of repayment is one (it implies, 𝑝 = 1), i.e., there are no
chances of default. From equation (8.1) we find that 𝑖 = 𝑟 (the rate of interest in
the formal sector (𝑖) is equal to the interest rate in the informal credit market (𝑟)).
However, if 𝑝 < 1, the repayment of the loan by the borrower is not so certain.
An implication of the above is that, 𝑖 > 𝑟 , which means the interest in the
informal credit market is higher than the interest rate in the formal sector.
The implication of the above indicates an essential aspect of the rural credit
market. In well-developed credit markets (markets in developed countries) with
strong legal institutions, there is a lower risk of default. In the case of weak legal
machinery, the chances of default are higher, as in the case of informal credit
markets. We now discuss various methods that can be used to manipulate and
reduce the risk of default.
162
8.6.2 Default and Fixed Capital Loans Credit Market
The larger the size of the loan and longer the period of the loan cycle before
repayment the greater is the risk of default. It implies that some loans will not be
repaid, no matter how large the interest rate premium is. The premium also
affects the chances of repaying a loan. Here large size loans also depend on many
factors related to society, for example, per capita wealth. The kind of use to
which a loan will be put also determines the repayment of the loan. If a borrower
uses the loan in a way where he will never have to borrow again, the informal
moneylender will not provide the loan. In the case of the informal market with no
legal enforcement mechanism, the threat to not advance any loan in the future is
the only tool used by the moneylender. But if there is no need for future loans,
the threat will have no value. Therefore, in order to resist a strategic default, the
lender will provide loans only for working capital or consumption purposes and
not for any permanent or fixed investments.
164
Credit Market
Equation (8.4) tells us that if the borrower is patient (have a longer mental
horizon t), he/she can be given a relatively worse deal without any fear of default.
Since the borrower is very patient, the threat of termination of future credit is
costly for the borrower, and the lender can charge higher rates without fear of
default.
If the borrower has access to more than one moneylender, then he/she might have
an incentive to default and switch to some other lender if the current lender
refuses to give a loan in the future. However, in reality, reputations play a crucial
role, and the rural economy is more insular. If a borrower defaults with one
lender, his reputation may be damaged, making it difficult to access a loan as
other lenders will be reluctant to lend him in the future. This can happen only
when the information about the borrower’s default action spreads throughout the
lending community. In credit markets of industrialized countries, credit histories
are tracked using a network of computers which acts as a device to discipline the
borrowers. On the other hand, traditional village societies with limited mobility
have very strong community networks. These networks act as a credible source
of information in the absence of a computerized credit agency. However, as
societies develop, mobility increases and traditional networks fall apart. The
computerized system of information networks may take a long time to come.
There is a large intermediate range of cases where the flow of information slows
down. This stage is a transition stage witnessed by many developing countries. It
can be said that information dissemination follows a U-shaped pattern, i.e., both
the traditional and the modern societies have good network of information
dissemination, but the transitional societies do not.
In the absence of information, credit market can break down. Therefore, it is
crucial for the moneylenders to screen the borrowers properly. Screening also has
positive externalities in the sense that they prevent default on the loans of other
lenders. Another way is to give testing loans – a small amount of loans to check
the credibility of the borrowers. These small loans act as indirect tests of the
borrower’s intrinsic honesty.
167
Land Labour and
Credit Markets
Check Your Progress 2
Note: i) Use the space given below for your answers.
ii) Check your progress with those answers given at the end of the unit.
1) What are the issues that arise due to imperfect information in the formal
credit market?
………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………….
2) Explain the Lender’s Risk Hypothesis.
………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………………………………………
3) Indicate (with the help of appropriate diagram) why the private money
lenders resort to credit rationing in rural areas.
………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………………………………………
groups having social or religious links with other members. The implications of
this approach are discussed below.
a) Cost of Monitoring: When the formal sector provides funds to the informal
sector, one of the outcomes could be the reduction in the interest rate due to
increased competition among the moneylenders. It also increases the number
of moneylenders in the informal credit market, increasing the options
available to the borrowers. The chances of default will also increase as a
result. This further adds an additional fixed cost to the lending process, i.e.,
the cost of monitoring the loans. Lenders will now have to spend additional
resources as well as time for tracking loans and checking the borrower’s
credit history. The equilibrium rate of interest will also increase as a result of
these increased costs. Therefore, increased competition can have the opposite
effect on the borrowers.
b) Collusion: In informal credit markets, the moneylenders may collude and
decide not to encroach upon each other’s territories. In other words, the
moneylenders decide an arrangement, and if the arrangement is not followed,
there is a punishment for it. Since these interactions are repeated, people
generally comply with the arrangements. However, the probability of
sustained cooperation depends on various factors. For instance, it will depend
on the additional profits that a moneylender can gain from breaking the
arrangement, the loss that other moneylenders face by the counter-invasion of
a rival, or the lag between invasion and counter-invasion. The vertical
expansion of formal credit market, therefore, leads to the following two
effects: (i) increasing competition and hence providing incentives to an
outsider to invade, and (ii) decrease the collusive practices by increasing the
punishments if someone deviates from the pact.
c) Differential Information: The third possible effect of this policy was
explored by Bose (1997). Different lenders may have different information
about the borrowers. Let us suppose that there are two lenders, A and B.
Lender A has more information as compared to B. Lender A can easily
identify bad and good borrowers and obviously will try to pick good
borrowers and leave the bad ones for lender B. The extension of formal
support will allow lender A to pick some more good borrowers. Lender B
will, however, find it unprofitable to operate. The expansion of the formal
sector will lead to a decline in informal-sector lending. The vertical linkage of
the formal sector with the informal sector will expand the activities of the
moneylenders to some extent. But due to the presence of differential
information, some of the moneylenders might face losses and choose to shut
down their lending activities, leading to a decline in informal-sector lending.
169
Land Labour and 8.7.2 Microfinance
Credit Markets
The term microfinance refers to a small loan especially meant for working capital
and designed for poor people. It is treated as one of the cost-effective and
sustainable ways to reach those who are out of the formal banking system. It is
suitable to provide credit facilities to poor individuals in rural areas. There is a
growing consensus that microfinance programs can help in identifying people at
the bottom of the pyramid and bring them into the formal credit system.
Moreover, microfinance loans do not require collateral, making it easier to reach
the poor. In this respect, let us discuss the main features of Grameen Bank, a
leading microcredit institution in Bangladesh.
that in the case of default in repayment, the group would be responsible. Joint
liability can help resolve the adverse selection problem through peer
monitoring. Moreover, joint liability loan (JLL) provides an incentive for
“endogenous group formation”, leading to “positive assortative matching”
and “social capital formation”. Consider a situation with one single lender
and two borrowers. Of these two borrowers, one has only a good project, and
the other one has both a good and a bad project. Both good and bad projects
require an initial investment of Re 1, which must be borrowed from the
lender. The good project returns Rs 2 to the borrower, but the bad project
returns only Rs 1.5, which the borrower can pocket. The imperfect
information problem (discussed earlier) arises because the bank does not
know about the borrower’s type. Consequently, if the loan goes to the risky
borrower, he will necessarily select the bad project where the bank faces a
loss due to no repayment. Thus, to break even in an expected sense, the bank
must charge at least Rs 2 from both borrowers. But in that case, the good
borrower may decide to opt-out of the market, which is the lemons problem.
While this problem will not arise if the lender could monitor the borrowers,
monitoring is very costly given that typically the bank officials are outsiders
who have little information regarding the characteristics of the borrowers.
However, the borrowers themselves are likely to have more inside
information about each other. The question is to devise mechanisms that
would allow the lender to tap into this information. The policy of JLL
provides a tool for doing precisely this.
Suppose that the lender makes a joint liability loan (JLL) to groups consisting of,
say, two borrowers. In that case, several effects are going to come into play. One
effect is that of peer monitoring, whereby borrowers monitor one another.
Positive Assortative Matching: Joint liability via an endogenous group
formation can help in resolving the asymmetric information problem in the
rural credit market. Consider a scenario with two groups of borrowers, safe
and risky. Further, suppose that the lender opts for group lending. The fact
that borrowers endogenously decide on choosing their own group is the key
to the solution. Faced with joint liability, safe borrowers form a group with
safe types rather than with risky types, so that safe type sticks together. The
risky borrowers have no alternative, but to form groups with risky types,
leading to segregated group formation, referred to in the literature as
“positive assortative matching” (PAM). Interestingly, this helps the bank to
keep safe types of borrowers in the market and ensure efficiency. Self-
selection, therefore, helps in keeping the risky borrowers away from the
credit market. Because the investment projects undertaken by risky borrowers
fail more often, they have to repay their defaulting peers more often under
group lending with joint liability; otherwise, they will be denied future access
to credit. Safe borrowers no longer have to cross-subsidise the default of the 171
Land Labour and risky borrowers. Consequently, there is a risk transfer from the bank to the
Credit Markets
risky borrowers themselves. This also implies that the safe types pay lower
interest rates than the risky types. Such a policy allows the bank to be better
insured against defaults and thereby charge a lower interest rate for safe and
risky types. The lower interest rates, in turn, encourage the safe borrowers to
re-enter the market, thus correcting the market failure.
● Peer Monitoring: The members of a particular group can at best predict
what a fellow member does with the loan but cannot completely control
his/her decisions. They might also be able to ‘monitor and influence’ the
choice of investments a borrower makes with the borrowed money. The
members might want the project to be relatively safe as compared to what an
individual might choose as an independent borrower. An individual with
limited liability would invest in a risky activity. However, in the case of
group lending with joint liability, all the members will put pressure on each
other to take up less risky projects. It is important to note that group lending
results in peer monitoring where other group members influence the borrower
to reduce the level of risk.
● Sequential Lending and Sequential Repayment: The flip side of joint
liability loan (JLL) is that it creates “strategic complementarities” in the
monitoring levels of the borrowers in a group. A decrease in the level of
monitoring by others in the group reduces the individual incentive to monitor.
The implication is that in equilibrium, there may be under-monitoring. The
intuition for strategic complementarity is simple to understand. A borrower
has an incentive to monitor if other borrowers monitor since if she does not,
she would be in trouble under JLL. This works both ways. If she is a risky
borrower and is being monitored by her peers, she would lose all private
benefits from a bad project. If she were a safe borrower with a good project,
she would have to part with her project return if she does not monitor.
Consequently, there may be virtually no peer monitoring in equilibrium. The
above argument identifies one possible reason why some group-lending
schemes fail. Moreover, group-lending schemes also involve other subtle
features that differentiate microfinance from traditional banking. These
include dynamic elements like “sequential repayment”, “sequential
lending”, and “contingent renewal”.
● Sequential Repayment: Sequential repayment refers to the feature that while
repayment starts within a month or so of the loans, these come in small and
easy but regular instalments. This is surprising since it is possible that the
project may not have started yielding any returns so soon. However, asking
for early repayments forces the borrowers to look for subsidiary loans from
family and even moneylenders. It is then argued that such bridge loans will
be forthcoming, provided the borrower is efficient and uses the initial loan
amount wisely. This information is likely to be available with friends and
172
family, and perhaps even the local moneylender, but is unlikely to be Credit Market
incentive to take loans. The moneylender (who is also a trader) can acquire the
surplus by paying lower prices for buying the output.
176
BLOCK 4
INDIVIDUALS, COMMUNITIES
AND
COLLECTIVE OUTCOMES
BLOCK INTRODUCTION
The fourth block of the course, titled Individuals, Communities and Collective
Outcomes, has two units. The basic objective of the block is to discuss the
role of the community in economic development. By community we mean that
part of society and exchange relations that do not involve the government and
the market mechanism. The two units in the block explore the role of social
norms, of personal relations among members of the community as also of
voluntary organizations and non-government organizations (NGOs), and
of panchayati raj institutions in India.
Unit 9 is on Individual Behaviour in Social Environments. It discusses
civil society organizations and institutions, and explores the role of social
norms and institutions. It discusses social institutions and social
equilibrium. The unit explains the emergence of multiple social equilibria
and deviations from usual market equilibrium.
Unit 10 is on Governance in Organisations and Communities. It deals with
various topics like the role and functioning of NGOs. The unit discusses, with
special reference to India, how rural local bodies like panchayati raj
institutions work. The unit also presents a theoretical discussion of the
important concept of ‘social capital’.
Individual Behaviour
UNIT 9 INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOUR IN SOCIAL in Social Environments
ENVIRONMENTS
Structure
9.0 Objectives
9.1 Introduction
9.2 Private Goods, Public Goods and Common Property Resources
9.3 Markets, Norms and Communities
9.4 Trust, Social Capital and Cooperation
9.5 Social Institutions and Social Equilibrium
9.6 Network Externalities and Multiple Social Equilibria
9.7 Let Us Sum Up
9.8 Hints to Check Your Progress Exercises
9.0 OBJECTIVES
After going through this unit, you will be able to explain:
explain the impact of social norms in the realization of economic outcomes;
discuss the role of social institutions and their relationships with economic
institutions;
describe how members of communities do social interactions among each
other based on trust;
define the concept of social capital;
describe the use and role of common property resources in developing
countries; and
discuss the possible reasons for social equilibrium being suboptimal (or
outcomes deviating from optimal ones) in developing countries.
9.1 INTRODUCTION
This unit discusses some topics that are of importance in understanding the
working of developing economies. We know that markets can play an important
role in allocating resources efficiently and also in providing incentives for
growth. But do they always work? We know that there can be market failure and
in trying to mitigate market failures, government action can make the situation
worse creating other problems. This needs us to investigate the working of the
Shri Saugato Sen, Associate Professor of Economics, IGNOU, New Delhi
179
Individuals, non-market, non-state part of the society. How does it work? What role does it
Communities and
Collective Outcomes play in influencing economic outcomes? Do economic agents make economic
decisions and take actions based on norms, customs and trust in the fellow-
members of the society? How do norms emerge? How are they sustained? This
unit discusses all these.
In this unit, therefore, we look at what are called civil society institutions or the
voluntary sector. We look at the social scaffolding of the economy. We look at
the role of norms and conventions. We look at the impact and influence of
institutions on the process of development. Traditionally, in microeconomics and
macroeconomics, we sometimes make analysis as if we are in an institutions-free
environment. But institutions matter. Therefore, firstly, the variables that have
to be taken into account when analysing economic processes must include non-
economic factors i.e. political, social and cultural factors. Secondly, institutions
vary across space and over time i.e. institutions are neither static nor uniform. In
developing countries, social institutions and communities impinge on the
economic processes a good deal. Hence, any study of developing countries need
to take this into account. Quite often, we observe that outcomes which are
inefficient and sub-optimal not only emerge but also tend to persist. It is as
though the society has chosen inefficiently an entire path of development that has
got itself historically locked–in. The unit therefore also discusses the importance
of governance, in terms of its impact on policy-making, and thereby on
development.
In your microeconomics course, you have studied about markets that are perfect
and some that are imperfect. Even when markets are imperfect, they exist so that
transactions take place. However, there are situations where markets are not only
imperfect, they are incomplete and even missing in some cases. There may be
coordination failure to such an extent that even when sellers are willing to sell
and buyers are present, the required transactions may not take place. This means,
the transaction costs and the costs of searching are too high.
Market imperfectness arise when there are a few sellers in the market and the
conditions of perfect competition are not met. We know that the latter are like:
(i) no seller is able to influence market price, (ii) there is free entry, (iii)
information flows are perfect and (iv) the product is homogeneous. Market
incompleteness, on the other hand, means that, some markets may not exist at all
i.e. markets may be missing. This situation quite often exists in rural markets,
particularly markets for credit. Likewise, in inter-temporal trade, incompleteness
of markets often comes into the picture. This is especially true for some financial
markets like futures markets, where delivery is to be made in the future
contingent on some event. For instance, if you are to receive an umbrella if it
rains (i.e. state-contingent), then an umbrella in sunshine can be considered a
‘different’ commodity from an umbrella if it rains. In the presence of risk and
uncertainty, and absence of information, it is difficult to transact for each state-
contingent commodity. In this sense, there may be incompleteness of markets. In
other words, in state contingent situations, if transactions are to be made ahead of
the events of delivery of goods, it may not be possible to specify each such
situation. An example of market that displays incompleteness is insurance
markets. In such cases, when we study developing economies, we find that
institutions, social norms and customs play a role. Hence norms and customs can
create additional constraints because norms may either promote development or
hinder it. Norms may remain static and unchanging or may evolve over time.
Every society has its own norms, some of which are also upheld by law. At the
same time, it is not that only the ‘best’ norms survive. Norms that are best in one
setting, may be inimical to development in another setting. This does not mean
that norms will be eroded overnight. The desire for human beings to conform is
immense. As long as conformity is fundamental, norms will take their own time
to change. It may appear that norms are always a hindrance and that conformity
can only slow down the pace of development. But this is not true because
without norms of decency and appropriate social conduct, economic life would
simply fall apart. History too plays a role because it establishes social equilibrium
that persists. This type of equilibrium often determines whether a new policy can
be undertaken.
183
Individuals, What kind of role does the community play in economic development? As
Communities and
Collective Outcomes people specialize in various activities, a system is required to coordinate them.
The 'economic system' is a combination of the economic organizations that
coordinate various economic activities so as to achieve a socially optimum
output. In this, market is an organization that coordinates profit-seeking
individuals through competition using prices as signal. Likewise, state is an
organization that influences people to adjust their resource allocations which it
does by government fiat (or a decree or law). On the other hand, community is an
organization that guides its members to voluntary cooperation based on personal
ties and mutual trust. Communities, therefore, provide a principle for
organisation. They have the potential to correct market and government failures
providing thereby an impetus to development. In other words, (i) market by
means of the price mechanism, (ii) state by means of command, and (iii)
community by means of cooperation and norms (based on a combination of
mutual trust and gain), coordinates the division of labour and allocation of
resources for a socially optimal outcome. In reality, the community and the state
often overlap. For instance, a village is a community where villagers cooperate
voluntarily. However, if villagers authorize a particular individual like the
village elder or panchayat to exercise coercive power in the administration of
village affairs, then the village functions like a small state.
188
Individual Behaviour
It is important to understand why and how a certain institution emerges, and what in Social Environments
purpose it serves. Even an institution that appears to be negative may be serving
some purpose. It is important to realise this to explain its persistence. The
institution may not only be not optimal; indeed, they may be dysfunctional but
may still persist. It is necessary to observe if there are regularities in the
evolution of institutions, as this gives rise to conventions.
Other important topics like the impact and influence of institutions on the
development process in developing countries was also discussed in the unit.
How institutions like property rights and the structure of markets determine
social outcomes were explained. The unit then analysed the role of social norms
and the community in economic development. Of late, it is being realised that
patterns of social interaction, social customs and norms and the community, exert
significant influence on the course of development of developing countries.
Finally, the unit discussed how widespread coordination failures can take place.
The puzzle of how suboptimal equilibria emerge and persist, and how the path
chosen initially determines the subsequent growth path, and how societies can get
locked in into inferior outcomes, were all explained in the unit..
193
Individuals,
Communities and
Collective Outcomes
UNIT 10 GOVERNANCE IN ORGANISATIONS
AND COMMUNITIES
Structure
10.0 Objectives
10.1 Introduction
10.2 Non-Government Organisations (NGOs)
10.2.1 Importance of an NGO
10.2.2 Functions of an NGO
10.3 Rural Local Bodies
10.3.1 Panchayati Raj Institutions
10.3.1.1 Recommendations of the Balwant Rai Mehta Committee
and The Ashok Mehta Committee
10.3.1.2 73rd Constitutional Amendment
10.3.2 Functions of Panchayati Raj Institutions
10.3.3 Sources of Income of Panchayats
10.3.4 Ministry of Panchayati Raj
10.4 Social Capital
10.4.1 Dimensions of Social Capital
10.4.2 Social Capital and Economic Growth
10.4.3 Social Capital and Poverty
10.4.4 Limitations of Social Capital
10.5 Let Us Sum Up
10.6 Hints to Check Your Progress Exercises
10.0 OBJECTIVES
After going through this unit, you will be able to explain:
discuss the importance of NGOs in economic development;
enumerate the functions of NGOs;
state the recommendations of the Balwant Rai Mehta Committee;
explain the working of Panchayati Raj Institutions;
describe the three facets of social capital; and
elucidate the relation of social capital with economic growth and poverty.
Contributed by Dr. Nidhi Tewathia, Assistant Professor, School of Social Sciences, IGNOU
194
Governance in
10.1 INTRODUCTION Organisations and
Communities
Effective governance takes place with the help of proper devolution of functions
and power. India being such a diverse nation in terms of religion, communities
and culture that the organisation of roles and power is a challenging task. Having
only the central and state government is not enough and hence the organisation at
the local level is necessary. We will learn about the rural local bodies like the
Panchayati raj institutions which are working at the grassroot level to enhance the
process of democratisation. Further, there are certain occasions when the
government finds it difficult to work successfully for the social justice and
promotion of development of the society. Certain sections become marginalised
and are not able to take benefit of many available resources. To bridge this gap,
we need non-governmental organisations (NGOs). We discuss the importance
and the functions of NGOs in India. In the last section, we discuss the concept of
‘social capital’, its various dimensions and its relation with economic growth and
poverty reduction. Social capital is the backbone of any country as it is the
relations and the bonds various groups and communities hold in a given nation.
The efficiency of various ways and types of governance depends on the social
capital of a country.
199
Individuals, Panchayat Samitis receive grants from the State Government. Apart from these
Communities and
Collective Outcomes grants, they can impose user charges on the facilities they provide such as
drinking water and irrigation, tolls for the bridges they maintain, etc.
Zila Parishads have five sources of income: (i) collection of license fees on
individuals (such as businessmen, brokers, commission agents, etc.) and taxes on
the sale of goods in the markets established by the Zila Parishad; (ii) share in the
land revenue collected by the State; (iii) income from various properties of the
Zila Parishad; (iv) grants from central and state governments; and (v) funds
received under developmental activities in the state.
During the Covid-19 pandemic, the Panchayati Raj institutions had an important
role to play. These institutions took initiatives in creation of isolation centres,
organisation of medical camps, carrying out awareness campaign, contact
tracing, provision of food to the poor, etc. Availability of funds is a major
problem of the Panchayati Raj institutions. According to the Economic Survey
2017-18, about 95 per cent of the resources of the Panchayats is received as
grants from the State and the Centre. Panchayats have a very low tax base
because of which they are not able to generate internal resources. Further, there is
some reluctance on the part of the local governments to impose taxes.
202
10.4.2 Social Capital and Economic Growth Governance in
Organisations and
Communities
We find that many countries having similar or identical production technology
and capital, have economic disparities across them. We expect that if two
countries have similar natural resources and production technology, then their per
capita gross domestic product should be similar. But this is not so. Many social
scientists and economists find themselves in a kind of puzzle as they find it
difficult to explain why the economic growth in two countries differ which
otherwise have equal access to technology, resource endowment, and market
access.
In order to analyse economic growth in an economy, we use standard economic
theories such as the Solow model or the Walrasian equilibrium model. They
assume that economic variables are the reasons of fluctuations in output level.
The problem with these two and other similar models is that they do not give
required weightage to the role of social and cultural factors which actually affect
the economic outcomes. So, a major criticism of economic theories is that they
are not able to explain economic growth completely. Social factors such as
norms, beliefs and institutions provide the missing part of the explanation. These
factors play a significant role in furthering the economic performance of a
country. Hence, these factors need to be considered in growth theories. Another
criticism is that the standard theories are unable to explain the factors behind
unsustainable unprecedented growth levels. Such high growth levels are also
accompanied by some undesirable externalities such as income inequality, social
injustice, environmental degradation, sluggish improvement in quality of life, and
social conflicts. Standard economic theories fail to explain why unprecedented
growth levels are also accompanied by these negative externalities. Further, the
whole economic development measurement model does not take into account the
prevailing social value systems.
At present, it is well established that there is a strong link between culture and
development. Social scientists are giving a good consideration to the process of
development informed by the social values and system. The preceding sub
section makes it clear that the social capital plays a very significant role in a
country’s development process.
207
BLOCK 5
ENVIRONMENT
AND
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK INTRODUCTION
Now we arrive at the penultimate block—the fifth—of the course.
This block is titled Environment and Sustainable Development This
block, too, has two units. The block discusses the crucial topic of
sustainable development. The concept is discussed and the link between
environment and economic development is explained. The block also
describes the concept of externality.
The first unit of this block, unit 11, titled Sustainable Development
discusses how economic development impacts the environment. The
unit defines and discusses sustainability and also explains and discusses
the role of renewable resources in development. The unit provides a brief
history of environmental change. The unit also explains and discusses
common-pool resources.
The final unit of the present block, unit 12, is titled Theories of
Regulation. This unit combines elements of public economics,
environmental economics and development economics. The unit explores
the relation between economic activity and climate. The concept of
externalities, is explained and discussed in the unit. The unit also
discusses very important topics in economics, like the Coase Theorem,
correcting for externalities, Pigovian taxes and the pros and cons of
emission taxes.
209
UNIT 11 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Sustainable
Development
Structure
11.0 Objectives
11.1 Introduction
11.2 Sustainable Development
11.3 Renewable Resources
11.3.1 Types of Renewable Resources
11.4 A Brief History of Environmental Change
11.4.1 India’s Environmental Problems
11.4.2 Globalisation and Environmental change
11.5 Common Pool Resources
11.5.1 Tragedy of Commons
11.6 Let Us Sum Up
11.7 Hints to Check Your Progress Exercises
11.0 OBJECTIVES
After going through this unit, you will be able to:
Explain the concept of Sustainable Development
Define the renewable resources and explain its types
Discuss the environmental changes over time
Describe the common pool resources
Present the issues related to common pool resources.
11.1 INTRODUCTION
Environment is of a great importance for the mankind. There are different types
of resources which humans use in day-to-day life. The way we use them impacts
the environment. The wastage of resources leads to depletion of such resources.
We begin this unit by understanding the concept of Sustainable development and
renewable resources. The changes in global environment and climate change is
something we all keep hearing in the news now and then. So, in one of the
sections, we will learn about the environment and the changes in environment
over the years. Environmental degradation also takes place due to the property of
Dr. Nidhi Tewathia, Assistant Professor, School of Social Sciences, IGNOU
211
Environment and common ownership of certain resources. Such resources fall in the category of
Sustainable
Development common pool resources and we humans take advantage of the existence of such
resources. The last section of this unit is dedicated to such resources.
1
In 1987, the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED), which had been set
up in 1983, published a report entitled ‘Our common future’. The document came to be known
as the Brundtland Report after the Commission's chairwoman, Gro Harlem Brundtland. It
developed guiding principles for sustainable development as it is generally understood today.
212
Sustainable
exploration and search of the renewable and non-renewable resources. The Development
problem with this approach is that all the resources are not substitutable. Also,
they cannot be created at the same speed at which they are being consumed.
There is a lot of discussion based on the concept of ecological sustainability. To
keep the welfare of the future generations in mind, the resources should be
allocated in a stable manner which can help us to sustain the levels of
development over time. That means we need to question the levels of
consumerism that the developed world and the rich class of the developing
countries are manifesting. This was the context of The Earth Summit, Rio de
Janeiro, 1992. The Agenda 21 of the Earth Summit accepted that human beings
are entitled to a healthy and productive life in harmony with nature. The
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), also known as the Global Goals, were
adopted by all United Nations Member States in 2015 as a universal call to action
to end poverty, protect the planet and ensure that all people enjoy peace and
prosperity by 2030. The 17 SDGs are integrated—that is, they recognize that
action in one area will affect outcomes in others, and that development must
balance social, economic and environmental sustainability.
But we must admit that uncertainty is a vital consideration in the economics of
sustainability. Over time it is expected that changes will occur in technology,
income and people’s preferences. Technology may change enormously as an
answer to changing relative scarcities and knowledge. Income will also not be
constant and preferences will differ across generations. The problem is not the
changes but we do not know for sure how and when these changes will occur and
we do not know what the implications of these changes will be for future
resource availability.
214
Sustainable
Wind energy generates electricity by turning wind turbines. The wind pushes the Development
turbine’s blades, and a generator converts this mechanical energy into electricity.
This electricity can supply power to homes and other buildings, and it can even
be stored in the power grid. China has the world's largest onshore wind farm in
Gansu Province.
Radiation from the Sun can be used as a power source as well. Photovoltaic cells
can be used to convert this solar energy into electricity. Individually, these cells
only generate enough energy to power a calculator, but when combined to create
solar panels or even larger arrays, they provide much more electricity. China,
U.S, Germany, Japan and India are top 5 countries producing solar energy.
217
11.5 COMMON POOL RESOURCES
Common Pool Resources (CPRs) are the resources which may be owned by
national, regional, or local governments, by communal groups, by private
individuals or corporations. They may be used as open access resources by
anyone who can access it. CPRs share two attributes of importance for economic
activities: (1) it is costly to exclude individuals from using the resource either
through physical barriers or legal instruments, and (2) the benefits derived by one
individual reduce the benefits available to others.
These resources may not have a formal owner but some kind of ownership
control is exercised collectively and the resources are often managed as common
property. The goods produced from these resources are consumed
individually (as private goods). For example, forests and grazing lands are
CPRs and they provide goods such as firewood and fodder.
CPRs play an important role in the users’ life. They supplement rural livelihood
and act as the safety nets for the poor in some seasons or at the time of bad
harvest or any other kind of crisis. CPRs are public goods with limited/
subtractive benefits; if individual A uses more, less will be left for others. Many a
times, CPR users resort to the practices which reflect their selfishness and short
sightedness. To avoid such deliberate acts, some sanction rules also are applied to
people or to whole communities in order to make them do what they may not
want to do. CPRs are therefore likely to face problems related to congestion,
depletion or degradation.
CPRs exhibit free or restricted access. Situations where there are no restrictions
on the access to a resource or its use, are called free or open access CPR. When a
resource is in abundant supply, it does not make sense to restrict its access or
limit its use. However, if the demand for the resource increases due to factors like
population pressure, industrialization, economic growth, etc. and the resource
becomes scarce, a common property free access regime is no longer appropriate.
Different models of CPRs’ governance are suggested by different people. There
are two dominant conceptual models of common property resource management:
a capitalist model and a socialist model. The capitalist model argues that
resources that are held commonly are subject to degradation. Hence, privatization
of public resources is the only viable solution to the problem. The socialist model
explains that economic poverty caused by inequitable distribution of resources
among rural agrarian population is the delivering force of resource destruction.
Therefore, collectivization or nationalization of public resources serves as an
equitable strategy of resource management.
219
Environment and canals, tube wells, other wells, and supply of all types of potable water also fall
Sustainable
Development in the category of CPRs depending upon their property rights. Unfortunately,
even after many debates about property rights (such as traditional rights,
community rights, and basic need human rights), water has not yet been declared
as CPR in India, though references are made in the water policy document
indirectly. By and large, water resources in India are in common property
regimes only. Irrigation canals are managed jointly by the government and
communities. Traditionally, tanks, village ponds, and lakes - all of which are
treated as CPRs - are sources of water for drinking, livestock rearing, washing,
fishing and bathing, and several sanitary-related activities.
Overall, we can say that human free access and unlimited consumption of finite
resource would extinguish such common resources. Hardin believed that since
man is compelled to procreated unlimitedly the Earth resources would eventually
get overexploited. To his eyes, mankind needed to radically change its way of
using common resources to avoid a disaster in the future. And this would also be
the way to keep on a sustainable development track.
220
Sustainable
11.6 LET US SUM UP Development
221
Environment and 2) (Refer sub-section 11.4.2) The damage caused to ecosystem from the oil that
Sustainable
Development spilled from one of the leaking containers of British Petroleum in 2010 is just
one of the examples of the threat globalization poses to the environment.
3) (Refer section 11.5) Common Pool Resources share two attributes of
importance for economic activities: (1) it is costly to exclude individuals from
using the resource either through physical barriers or legal instruments, and
(2) the benefits derived by one individual reduce the benefits available to
others.
4) (Refer sub section 11.5.1) Garret Hardin argued that if individuals act
independently, rationally and focused on pursuing their individual interests,
they would end up going against the common interests of their communities
and exhaust the planet’s natural resources. This overuse of public resources is
termed as the "Tragedy of the Commons".
222
Theories of
Regulation
UNIT 12 THEORIES OF REGULATION
Structure
12.0 Objectives
12.1 Introduction
12.2 Externalities and its Types
12.2.1 Positive Externality
12.2.2 Negative Externality
12.3 Coase Theorem
12.4 Economic Activity and Climate
12.5 State Regulation of the Environment
12.5.1 Pigouvian taxes
12.5.2 Emission taxes
12.6 Let Us Sum Up
12.7 Hints to Check Your Progress Exercises
12.0 OBJECTIVES
After going through this unit, you will be able to:
Define the negative and positive externality with the help of an example
Describe the Relationship between the economic activity and climate change
12.1 INTRODUCTION
In this unit, we will start with understanding the concept of Externality and its
types. The economic consequences of externalities will also be discussed in order
to understand how the basic activity of production and consumption impacts the
climate. The role of state is very important in order to mitigate the environmental
damage due to economic activity. Hence the unit also covers the role of state in
this regard. The specific mechanisms like Pigouvian tax or emission tax are also
explained in detail.
Dr. Nidhi Tewathia, Assistant Professor, School of Social Sciences, IGNOU
223
Environment and
Sustainable 12.2 EXTERNALITIES AND ITS TYPES
Development
We noted in the previous unit that market mechanism will not be successful if the
resource ownership is not clearly defined. The property being the common
resource, individuals could neither take account of the full benefits nor they could
completely understand the costs of their actions. This happens because the costs
and benefits are treated as incidental or external by such individuals. Similarly,
there is another situation wherein the individuals do not take a complete account
of their transaction/activity. A technical term used to describe this situation is
externality. Externalities are the conditions which arise when the actions of some
individuals have direct effects on the welfare or utility of other individuals. The
effects mentioned can be positive or negative. Also, an externality is a spillover
effect associated with production or consumption that extends to a third party
outside the market. Externalities can also be distinguished as depletable and non-
depletable. The flowers falling from a tree are depletable externality because if
one person takes it another cannot. The fragrance of flowers, however, is a non-
depletable externality because one person's enjoying it does not reduce the
fragrance for others. In many instances, the problem of externality creeps into
many government policies having spill over effects. For example, free electricity
offered to farmers for irrigation purposes results in over-extraction of ground
water, which depletes the water table that reduces the availability of water to
others.
225
Environment and In the Fig. 12.2, the curve MC shows private costs of the product which involves
Sustainable
Development negative externality. MSC curve represents marginal social cost, which is derived
after adding the external costs to the private costs. This means that the difference
between the MC curve and MSC curve is external costs. Given a horizontal
demand curve (P1), the private equilibrium leads to the quantity Q1 but the social
optimum will be achieved with the intersection of MSC and demand curve. This
intersection gives us the quantity Q*. So, we can say that if the negative
externality is not considered, more quantity of the product is produced and
exchanged in the market as Q1> Q*.
229
Environment and
Sustainable
Check Your Progress 1
Development
Note: i) Use the space given below for your answers.
ii) Check your progress with those answers given at the end of the unit.
1) Define Positive externality and Negative externality.
………………………………………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………….
2) Why does the social optimal level of production is higher in case of positive
externality? Explain with the help of a diagram.
………………………………………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
3) Why do the externalities arise?
………………………………………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………….
4) Define Coase Theorem. Under which assumptions the theorem works?
………………………………………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………….
233
Environment and
Sustainable
Development
236
BLOCK 6
GLOBALISATION
BLOCK INTRODUCTION
The present Block, the sixth and final one of this course, is titled, and discusses,
globalization. Since the late 1980s, and particularly since the early 1990s,
globalisation has received a spurt in many countries. India, too embarked on a
course of globalization in 1991 with much vigour and vim. The units of this
block present a theoretical discussion of glaobalisation and its impact on
development.
237
Changing Perspectives
UNIT 13 CHANGING PERSPECTIVES ON on Globalisation
GLOBALISATION
Structure
13.0 Objectives
13.1 Introduction
13.2 Concept and Meaning of Globalisation
13.3 Perspectives on Globalisation
13.3.1 The Economistic Perspective
13.3.2 The Multidimensional Perspective
13.3.3 The Cosmopolitan Perspective
13.4 Approaches to Globalisation
13.5 Impact of Globalisation
13.5.1 Globalisation and Labour
13.5.2 Globalisation and Environment
13.5.3 Globalisation and Poverty
13.6 Let Us Sum Up
13.7 Hints to Check Your Progress Exercises
13.0 OBJECTIVES
After going through this unit, you will be able to:
Discuss various perspectives on globalization
Explain the three approaches to globalization
Identify the impact of globalization.
13.1 INTRODUCTION
Globalisation is a multi-dimensional concept. Due to the complexity involved in
this term, it is difficult to give it one definition. It can be understood as a term
indicating that all political, economic, cultural and social activities operate at one
level i.e., the international level. We all have observed an unexpected and fast
growth in people and communities connecting globally. The physical distance
between different people, communities and cultures has become less due to
available platform of communication using new technology via various
applications. This Unit provides the understanding of the concept of
globalization, the various perspectives on globalization, approaches of
globalization and a general discussion on the impact of globalization.
Dr. Nidhi Tewathia, Assistant Professor, School of Social Sciences, IGNOU
239
Globalisation
13.2 CONCEPT AND MEANING OF
GLOBALISTAION
The term globalisation is widely used. For example, it is used in various branches
of social sciences, in the profession like journalism and in popular discourse. But
its wide usage has still not led to one globally accepted definition of
globalisation. It seems every one agrees that it is a process of social change
which affects various dimensions of an individual’s life or of a country. But the
nature of the process and the effects of globalization have always been debated
and contested.
Different interpretations of the nature of global change which come to surface as
a result of these debates, reflect different perspectives on globalization, from the
viewpoint of various disciplines of social science. The views of economists,
sociologists and the political scientists on globalization emphasize various
dimensions of globalization. Due to such views about globalization, the term is
evaluated and assessed differently. Let us discuss the emergence of the concept
of globalization and its social science usage.
Presently the term globalization is used in everyday discourse. It was popularized
only in the 1990s. But, in social sciences it has been used for many more years
prior to the 1990s. As per Jan Scholte (2000) the term was first employed in the
social sciences during the Second World War. Mainly, the term was used to focus
on global economic exchanges. Innovations in the communications technology
started creating a ‘global village’ as such innovations exponentially amplified the
stream of information around the world with reflective consequences for
economic, political and cultural interactions. The meaning of global village was
taken in the sense that people living in global village will have a common global
view which will act as identity changer. In such a situation, it was common to
assume that a global citizen will emerge with a global consciousness of the unity
of all humankind. All of this affected the international economic scenario as it
stressed the increasing interdependence of different countries and the emergence
of a global market. Such changes affect the areas like communications,
international migration, governance and political arrangements.
Roland Robertson, a professor of sociology at the University of Aberden, was the
first person who defined globalization as ‘the understanding of the world and the
increased perception of the world as a whole’ 1. Martin Albrow and Elizabeth
King, sociologists, define globalization as ‘all those processes by which the
1
Robertson, Roland (1992). Globalization : social theory and global culture (Reprint. ed.).
London: Sage. ISBN 0803981872
240
Changing Perspectives
peoples of the world are incorporated into a single world society’2. Thus, we can on Globalisation
say that globalisation is about communication between the nations, cultures,
different social, economic and political structures. It requires reshaping and
reorganizing of the roles and responsibilities of market, governments and the
society.
2
Albrow, Martin and Elizabeth King (eds.) (1990). Globalization, Knowledge and Society
London: Sage. ISBN 978-0803983243.
241
Globalisation postponed. But by 1995 the endogenous model became less relevant because of
increased economic exchanges and interdependence. The gold standard was
repealed in 1971 which made the international flow of financial capital easy. This
had an impact on East Asian countries which experienced a boost in their exports
due to the availability of low cost labour.
There have been many developments historically which manifest the process of
globalization.
The consolidated hold of the United States over the International Monetary
Fund and World Bank.
The deregulation of international economic exchanges
Increased volume of global trade
New opportunities for multinational corporations
More frequent outsourcing and relocation of production
Disintegration of the Soviet Union
Adoption of market liberalism in the former communist countries
China’s expansion of the global economic market
The economists believe that the global market has done the following:
created mass employment in many low-income developing economies
the production of goods for export to the high-income countries has brought
about increases in standards of living
created new opportunities for entrepreneurs
stimulated employment in the Western countries
The overall result seems to be a win-win situation in which standards of living
for those who participate in the global economy rise dramatically. But these
assertions have been widely challenged by many groups like academicians,
policymakers, union leaders. Many people also lost their jobs due to outsourcing
and the relocation of industrial production. So, we can say that globalization will
not ultimately benefit all of humankind. It is believed that the economistic
perspective is narrow and it does not consider and capture the complex
multidimensional features of the globalization process.
247
Globalisation The intersection of trade and the environment does raise a number of important
issues. Environmental issues are playing a growing role in disputes about
international trade. Some anti-globalization activists claim that growing
international trade continually harms the environment. Some also claim that
international trade agreements and the role of the World Trade Organization,
have the effect of hindering environmental action. Most international economists
do not believe that trade agreements prevent countries from having enlightened
environmental policies.
14.0 OBJECTIVES
After going through this unit, you will be able to explain:
understand the different theories of free trade
appreciate the advantages of or gains from international trade
situate the theories explained in the present context of globalisation
differentiate between tariff and non-tariff barriers
explain the formation and progression of GATT and WTO
discuss various trade agreements and trade blocs
justify the existence of international finance mechanism.
Dr. Nidhi Tewathia, Assistant Professor, School of Social Sciences, IGNOU
250
Globalisation and
14.1 INTRODUCTION Development
The unit begins with explaining various theories of free trade like theory of
absolute advantage, theory of comparative advantage and Heckscher-Ohlin
theorem. The theories also indicate the scope of exploitation of smaller countries
by the big countries. To protect the trade, countries impose tariff and non-tariff
barriers which allow the countries to escape the exploitation. Such barriers are
explained at length. After that, the unit progresses to describe various trade
agreements like bilateral agreements, multilateral agreements and the trading
blocs. The objectives and the progression of trade agreements like GATT and the
formation of WTO are also explained. With globalization and increasing
importance of international trade comes the requirement of international financial
structure. The need and benefits of such a structure is explained in detail towards
the end of this unit.
256
Globalisation and
Local Content Requirement (LCR): LCR is a regulation that requires some Development
specified fraction of a final good to be produced domestically. In some cases, this
fraction is specified in physical units. In other cases, the requirement is stated in
value terms by requiring that some minimum share of the price of a good
represent domestic value added. Local content laws have been widely used by
developing countries trying to shift their manufacturing base from assembly back
into intermediate goods. From the point of view of the domestic producers of
parts, a local content regulation provides protection in the same way an import
quota does. From the point of view of the firms that must buy locally, however,
the effects are somewhat different. Local content does not place a strict limit on
imports. Instead, it allows firms to import more, provided that they also buy more
domestically. This means that the effective price of inputs to the firm is an
average of the price of imported and domestically produced inputs.
Exchange Controls: Exchange controls are restrictions imposed by countries'
Central Banks that directly limit domestic residents' ability to acquire foreign
currency in exchange for domestic currency. For instance, one method of
imposing exchange controls, involved acquiring the Central Bank's permission to
hold foreign currency bank accounts.
Import Deposit Schemes: These are rules imposed by countries' Central Banks,
which tend to restrict imports by making them more expensive. For instance,
under the rules importers are required to deposit a certain amount (usually in
proportion to the value of the imported good) with the Central Bank, which
effectively raises the cost of importing.
14.5.4 ASEAN
The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) was established in 1967
by the five original member Countries, namely, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines,
Singapore, and Thailand. Brunei Darussalam joined in 1984, Vietnam in 1995,
Laos and Myanmar in 1997 and Cambodia in 1999, making it ASEAN-10.
ASEAN began with emphasis on political issues but in recent times economic
integration has become priority, especially since the Asian crisis of the 1997. The
Framework Agreement on Enhancing Economic Cooperation was adopted at the
Fourth ASEAN Summit in Singapore in 1992, which included the launching of a
scheme toward an ASEAN Free Trade Area or AFTA. The strategic objective of
AFTA is to increase the ASEAN region's competitive advantage as a single
production unit. The elimination of tariff and non-tariff barriers among the
member countries is expected to promote greater economic efficiency,
productivity and competitiveness. The Fifth ASEAN Summit held in Bangkok in
1995 adopted the Agenda for Greater Economic Integration.
In 1997, the ASEAN leaders adopted the ASEAN Vision 2020, which called for
ASEAN Partnership in Dynamic Development aimed at forging closer economic
integration within the region. The vision statement also resolved to create a
stable, prosperous and highly competitive ASEAN Economic Region, in which
there is a free flow of goods, services, investments, capital, and equitable
economic development and reduced poverty and socio-economic disparities.
ASEAN cooperation has resulted in greater regional integration. Tourists from
ASEAN countries themselves have been representing an increasingly important
share of tourism in the region. ASEAN economic cooperation is comprehensive,
which covers the following areas: trade, investment, industry, services, finance,
agriculture, forestry, energy, transportation and communication, intellectual
property, small and medium enterprises, and tourism.
261
Globalisation 14.5.5 SAARC
The South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) was
established when its Charter was formally adopted on 8 December 1985 by the
Heads of State or Government of Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal,
Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The Association provides a platform for the peoples of
South Asia to work together in a spirit of friendship, trust and understanding. It
aims to promote the welfare of the peoples of South Asia and to improve their
quality of life through accelerated economic growth, social progress and cultural
development in the region. The areas of cooperation under the reconstituted
Regional Integrated Programme of Action which is pursued through the
Technical Committees now cover: Agriculture and Rural Development; Health
and Population Activities; Women, Youth and Children; Environment and
Forestry, Science and Technology and Meteorology; Transport; and Human
Resource Development. Working Groups have also been established in the areas
of: Information and Communications Technology (ICT); Biotechnology;
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR); Tourism; and Energy.
Summits are the highest authority in SAARC and are to be held annually. The
Agreement on SAARC Preferential Trading Arrangement (SAPTA) was signed
in 1993 and four rounds of trade negotiations have been concluded. With the
objective of moving towards a South Asian Economic Union (SAEU), the
Agreement on South Asian Free Trade Area (SAFTA) was signed during the
Twelfth Summit in Islamabad in January 2004. SAFTA entered into force since
July 2006. During the Twelfth Summit in Islamabad, the SAARC Social Charter
was signed in order to address social issues such as population stabilisation,
empowerment of women, youth mobilisation, human resource development,
promotion of health and nutrition, and protection of children, which are keys to
the welfare and well-being of all South Asians.