EPR Case Invictus-1

The Brief Case 3.
Circular Economy in E-Waste Management: A Study on Product Take-back, Recycling,

and Refurbishment
Case Overview:
This case study explores the responsibilities of manufacturers and producers in managing
electronic waste (e-waste) once the life cycle of their products ends. It emphasizes the
importance of the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) outlined in the E-Waste
(Management) Rules, 2016, focusing on product take-back, recycling, and refurbishing. The
case aims to understand the economic, environmental, marketing and regulatory challenges
faced by companies and highlights successful business models and strategies for compliance.
Background:
1. Introduction to E-Waste:
E-waste, or electronic waste, includes discarded electronic devices and their

components, which can harm the environment due to toxic substances like lead and
mercury. Rapid technological advancements and shorter product lifecycles have led to
increasing e-waste volumes. Globally, e-waste reached 53.6 million metric tons in
2019, growing by around 2 million metric tons annually. India, producing over 3.2
million metric tons in 2020, is among the largest generators. However, a significant
part of this is processed informally, leading to environmental and health risks. Efforts
worldwide and in India, like the E-Waste (Management) Rules, 2016, aim to improve
recycling and safe disposal, focusing on reducing the environmental impact and
promoting sustainable practices.
2. E-Waste Management Rules, 2016:
The E-Waste (Management) Rules, 2016 outline key provisions for managing
electronic waste, emphasizing the responsibilities of various stakeholders. Producers
are required to implement systems for collecting and recycling e-waste, including
obtaining Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) authorization. Consumers,
including bulk users, must ensure that their e-waste is handed over to authorized
collection centers or recyclers. Recyclers are responsible for processing e-waste using
environmentally sound methods. EPR aims to make producers accountable for the
entire lifecycle of their products, ensuring that they take back and manage end-of-life
products. This system encourages a circular economy by facilitating collection and
recycling processes. Sustainable disposal practices, such as take-back schemes,
recycling, and refurbishment, are crucial for minimizing environmental damage,
reducing resource extraction, and reusing valuable materials. These efforts help
mitigate the harmful effects of improper e-waste disposal and promote long-term
ecological balance.
Case Scenario:
A leading electronics company (e.g., smartphones, laptops) in India faces challenges in

managing the end-of-life products under the E-Waste (Management) Rules, 2016. As part of
its EPR obligations, the company must establish a system for collecting used or end-of-life
electronics from consumers, ensuring environmentally sound recycling, and utilizing parts for
refurbishing new products. The company aims to balance economic costs with environmental
responsibilities while meeting regulatory requirements. Additionally, the company is
struggling to effectively market its take-back programs to consumers, leading to lower-than-
expected returns of end-of-life products.
Key Issues:
Regulatory Compliance:
• Understanding EPR authorizations and the need for establishing take-back

mechanisms.
• Challenges in aligning collection targets with the rules (Schedule III targets).
• Coordination with the Central and State Pollution Control Boards for compliance
monitoring
Collection and Channelization:
• Strategies for implementing take-back systems, such as buy-back arrangements,

deposit refund schemes, and e-waste collection centers.
• Logistics of channelizing e-waste from consumers to authorized recyclers.
• Role of Producer Responsibility Organizations (PROs) in facilitating e-waste
management
Economic Challenges:
• High costs of setting up infrastructure for collection and recycling.

• Cash flow issues due to delayed returns on recycled materials.
• Balancing costs with the potential revenue from selling refurbished products and
recovered materials.
Environmental Concerns:
• Safe storage and transportation of e-waste to prevent environmental damage.

• Recycling processes to minimize hazardous materials, as outlined under Rule 16 of
the management rules.
• Measures for reducing carbon footprint through efficient recycling and reuse
Marketing Challenges:
• Consumer Awareness: Many consumers are unaware of the company’s take-back

programs, which hinders the return rates of end-of-life products.
• Brand Perception: Despite the company’s efforts in sustainable practices, the market
perception doesn’t yet associate the brand with eco-friendly practices.
• Behavioural Barriers: Consumers may perceive the process of returning their
devices as inconvenient, even if incentives like buy-back offers or discounts are
provided.
• Competitive Marketing: Competing brands may also be implementing take-back and
recycling initiatives, making it difficult to differentiate the company’s program in a
crowded market.
Case Questions:
1. Compliance Strategy: How can the company design a robust EPR plan to comply
with the E-Waste (Management) Rules, 2016? What steps should it take to ensure
smooth coordination with pollution control authorities?
2. Economic Viability: Given the financial challenges of recycling and refurbishment,
what business models could make the take-back and recycling process profitable for
the company?
3. Operational Efficiency: What measures can the company adopt to streamline the
collection and recycling process while minimizing the environmental impact?
4. Consumer Engagement: How can the company motivate consumers to return their
end-of-life products? Explore strategies like buy-back programs and awareness
campaigns.
5. Risk Management: What risks does the company face in e-waste management, and
how can these be mitigated? Consider operational, financial, and reputational risks.
6. Marketing Strategy: What strategies should the company adopt to enhance
awareness and participation in its e-waste take-back programs? How can it position
itself as a leader in sustainability to differentiate from competitors? Consider
marketing channels, messaging, partnerships, and consumer incentives.
Suggested Readings & References:
• E-Waste (Management) Rules, 2016

• Case study examples on circular economy .models in electronics.
• Industry reports on successful EPR implementations and best practices in e-waste
management.
• Regulatory frameworks in other countries for benchmarking purposes

EPR Case Invictus-1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

EPR Case Invictus-1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

EPR Case Invictus-1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Brief Case 3.

Circular Economy in E-Waste Management: A Study on Product Take-back, Recycling,

E-waste, or electronic waste, includes discarded electronic devices and their

2. E-Waste Management Rules, 2016:

A leading electronics company (e.g., smartphones, laptops) in India faces challenges in

• Understanding EPR authorizations and the need for establishing take-back

Collection and Channelization:

• Strategies for implementing take-back systems, such as buy-back arrangements,

• High costs of setting up infrastructure for collection and recycling.

• Safe storage and transportation of e-waste to prevent environmental damage.

• Consumer Awareness: Many consumers are unaware of the company’s take-back

Suggested Readings & References:

• E-Waste (Management) Rules, 2016

You might also like