Evaluation of Arguments
Evaluation of Arguments
The logical assessment or evaluation of a deductive argument has to do with validity, invalidity
and soundness. To say that an argument is valid, in this regard, is to submit that its conclusion
logically follows from its premises. Example:
1. All carnivorous animals are dangerous
All lions are carnivorous animal
Therefore, All lions are dangerous.
2. All birds can fly
All eagles are bird
Therefore, All eagles can fly.
3. All musicians can dance
Sola is a musician
Therefore, Sola can dance.
4. All footballers are rich
Victor is a footballer
Therefore, Victor is rich.
5. All ladies are responsible
Elena is a lady
Therefore, Elena is responsible.
A valid deductive argument is one supporting the conclusion. This argument is not only valid, it
is sound. A sound argument is one that has all the premises true and the conclusion is true.
A valid argument form guarantees that if the premises are true, the conclusion is true as well.
Any argument form which does not guarantee the truth of the conclusion even if the premises are
true, is an invalid argument form.
A deductive argument would be valid if and only if it would necessarily be impossible for the
conclusion to be false if the premises are true. A deductive argument which is valid on account
of its truth-functional form is called a truth-functionally valid argument. If valid on account of its
quantificational form, it is said to be quantificationally valid. Given these logical conditions, if
an argument is not invalid, it follows that it is valid. In connection with the soundness of
arguments, it should be noted that the validity of an argument or of a deductive inference does
not in any way guarantee the truth of the argument. However, sound arguments are valid
deductive arguments with premises that are all true. In this sense, a sound deductive argument
normally provides a conclusive evidence for the truth of its conclusion.
We can submit that for an argument to be sound, two things are required. They are:
a. All the premises which imply the truth of the conclusion must be true.
b. The argument itself must be patiently valid.
An unsound deductive argument will be an argument which fails to establish the truth of its
conclusion. An argument will be unsound if one of the following conditions is present. They are:
a. the argument form is valid but one or more of the premises are false.
b. the premises are true but the form is invalid.
c. One or more of the premises are false and the form is invalid.
While an invalid argument is necessarily an unsound argument, a valid argument may be sound
but not in all cases. Similarly, we would say that an argument is sound if in the first instance, it is
valid. Secondly, all the premises and the conclusion of such an argument must be factually or
empirically true. However, truth and validity are two composite necessary conditions for a sound
argument. Examples:
1. All musicians are politicians
Titi is a musician
Therefore, Titi is a politician.