Chapter 6
Chapter 6
6. OBSERVATIONS STUDIES
1
Besides collecting data visually, observation involves listening, reading ,
smelling, and touching. As used in this text, observation includes the full range
of monitoring behavioural and non-behavioural activities and conditions, which,
as shown in Exhibit 8-3, can be classified roughly as follows:
Non-behavioural Observation
Record analysis
Physical condition analysis
Physical process analysis
Behavioural Observation
Nonverbal analysis
Linguistic analysis
Extra-linguistic analysis
Spatial analysis
a) Non-behavioural Observation
A prevalent form of observation research is record analysis. This may involve
historical or current records and public or private records. They may be written,
printed, sound-recorded, photographed, or videotaped.
2
b) Behavioural Observation
The observational study of persons can be classified into four major categories.
Non-verbal behaviour is the most prevalent of these and includes body
movement, motor expressions, and even exchange of glances. At the level of
gross body movement, one might study how sales person travels a territory. At a
fine level, one can study the body movements of a worker assembling a product
or time-sample the activity of a department's workforce to discover the share of
time each worker spends in various ways, More abstractly, one can study body
movement as an indicator of interest or boredom, anger or pleasure in a certain
environment. Motor expressions such as facial movements can be observed as
a sign of emotional states.
Advantages
Observation is the only method available to gather certain types of
information. The study of records, mechanical processes, and young
children, as well as other inarticulate participants, falls into this category.
Observation aids in collection of original data at the time they occur.
Though observation one can secure information that most participants would
ignore either because it is so common and expected or because it is not
seen as relevant.
Observation it alone can capture the whole event as it occurs in its natural
environment. Whereas the environment of an experiment may seem
contrived to participants, and the number and types of questions limit the
range of responses gathered from respondents, observation is less
restrictive than most primary collection methods.
Participants seem to accept an observational intrusion better than they
respond to questioning. Observation is less demanding of them and normally
has a less biasing effect on their behaviour than does questioning.
Disadvantage
The observation method has some research limitations.
The observer normally must be at the scene of the event when it lakes place,
yet it is often impossible to predict where and when the event will occur.
3
Observation is a slow and expensive process that requires either human
observers or costly surveillance equipment.
A third limitation of observation is that most reliable results of observation are
restricted to information that can be learned by overt action or surface
indicators.
The research environment is more likely suited to subjective assessment and
recording of data than to controls and quantification of events.
Observation is limited as a way to learn about the past. It is similarly limited
as a method by which to learn what is going on in the present at some
distant place.
4
6.3. The Observer-Participant Relationship
The relationship between observer and participant may be viewed from three
perspectives:
a) Directness of Observation
5
reconstruct what they were not able to record.
Also, observer fatigue, boredom, and distracting events can reduce the
accuracy and completeness of observation.
Indirect observation is less flexible than direct observation but is also much
less biasing and may be less erratic in accuracy.
Another advantage of indirect observation is that the permanent record can
be reanalyzed to include many different aspects of the event.
b) Concealment
c) Participation
6
research than, say, in anthropology or sociology.
b) Content Specification
Specific conditions, events, or activities that we want to observe determine
the observational reporting system (and correspond to measurement
questions).
To specify the observation content, we should include both the major
variables of interest and any other variables that may affect them.
Observation may be at either a factual or an inferential level. Exhibit 8-6
shows how we could separate the factual and inferential components of a
salesperson's presentation.
c) Observer Training
There are a few general guidelines for the qualification and selection of
observers:
d) Data Collection
The data collection plan specifies the details of the task. In essence it answers
the questions who, what, when, how, and where.