Lecture 20240826205952
Lecture 20240826205952
• Shunt admittance
y = g + j b S / mi Y = y = G+ j B S
Short line model (shorter than 80km/50 miles, voltage < 69kV)
Medium line model (80km/50miles < medium <
250km/150miles)
Long line model (longer than 250km/150miles)
Equivalent π model is used for medium and long lines
• Shunt admittance Y: A = D = 1, B = 0, C =Y S
Ignore shunt
admittance
Nominal
circuit
Units on
z and y are
per unit
length!
For operation at frequency , let z = r + j L
and y = g +jC (with g usually equal 0)
ENG164 Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution Systems 23
Derivation of V, I Relationships
• Let series impedance per unit length be
• z = r + j ωL [Ω/m]
• Let shunt admittance per unit length be
• y = g + j ω C = 0 + j ωC [S/m]
• Let x be the distance from the receiving end toward
the sending end:
We can then derive the following relationships:
dV = I z dx
dI = (V + dV ) y dx V y dx
dV ( x) dI ( x)
= zI = yV
dx dx
ENG164 Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution Systems 24
Long Transmission Line Model
d cosh( x) d sinh( x)
= sinh( x) = cosh( x)
dx dx
ENG164 Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution Systems 29
Complex Hyperbolic Functions
•For x = + j the cosh and sinh functions
have the following form
IS IR
VS VR
tanh l
Y 2 with Y
= yl
2 l
2
>
<
= 2π
β
Where = B
= A
PR,max =
Real Power
ignoring distributed effects:
VRVS
P = PS = PR = sin d , d = V − V
X s R
1
– Transfer capability is increased by
1 − C
– Typically, C is between 0.3 and 0.7
ENG164 Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution Systems 91
Series Compensation
• Advantages
– Cost-effectiveness - 345 kV series cap station costs $5–$10M
– Self-regulation - No need for complex controls
– Outage time
• Disadvantages
– Higher short circuit currents
– Sub-synchronous resonance issues
• Alternatives
– Build a new line. Hard to justify cost and environmental impact
– Re-conductor. Prolonged line outage; installing a larger conductor may
require heavier structures
– Operate at higher voltage. Install higher-voltage, higher-cost equipment
(transformers, insulators, etc)
for VS=VR,
From
If the shunt capacitance is neglected A=1
Capacitances in medium & long line reduce A, A < 1 VR > VS
By using the shunt inductors as load is removed, the reduction of the
shunt susceptance to a value of (BC - BL) can limit the rise of the no-
load voltage at the receiving end.
jX’d ZL
E’
Zs
y10 y20
Pe
Pm
E' V
Pmax = d
X 12 0 d0 π/2 π
f 0
• Characteristic equation: s2 = − PS
H
– rule 1: if PS is negative, one root is in RHP and system
is unstable
– rule 2: if PS is positive, two roots in the jω axis and
motion is oscillatory and undamped, system is
marginally stable
ENG164 Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution Systems 117
Steady-State Stability – Small Disturbance
• Characteristic equation:
– rule 2 (continued): the oscillatory frequency of the
undamped system f 0
n = PS
H
• Damping torque
– phenomena: when there is a difference angular velocity
between rotor and air gap field, an induction torque will
be set up on rotor tending to minimize the difference of
velocities
– introduce a damping power by damping torque
dd
Pd = D
dt
– introduce the damping power into swing equation
H d 2 d dd
+ D + PS d = 0
f 0 dt 2
dt
ENG164 Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution Systems 118
Stability Analysis on Swing Equation
• Characteristic equation:
d d
2
dd
– 2
+ 2n + n d = 0
2
dt dt
• Analysis of characteristic equation
– s + 2n s + n = 0
2 2
D f
– for damping coefficient =
2 HP
0
S
1
1− 2 1− 2
– response time constant
1 2H
= =
n f 0 D
– settling time: tS 4
– relations between settling time and inertia constant H:
increase H will
ENG164 Powerresult
Generation,in longerandtSDistribution
Transmission , decrease n
Systems ω and 120
Solving The Swing Equation Using
State Space Matrix
• State space approach
– state space approach can solve multi-machine system
– let x1=Δd, x2=Δω=Δd
– x1 = 0 1 x1
= x (t ) = Ax (t )
x 2
2 − n − 2n x2
– y1 1 0 x1
y = 0 = y (t ) = Cx (t )
2 1 x2
u
x 2 ( s ) = ( s ) =
(s 2
+ 2n + n2 )
– taking the inverse Laplace transform with initial state
x1(0)=Δd0, x2(0)=Δω0=0
– state solution: x1(t)=Δd(t), x2(t)=ω(t)
d 0 d 0
d = e − nt sin(d t + ), d = d 0 + e − nt sin(d t + )
1− 2 1− 2
–
n d 0 − t d
= − e sin(d t ), = 0 + n 0 e − t sin(d t )
n n
1− 2 1− 2
ENG164 Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution Systems 122
STEADY STATE STABILITY
EXAMPLE
• Example 11.3
– using the state space matrix to solve d and ω
– the original state d0=16.79o, new state after ΔP is
imposed d=22.5o
– the linearized equation is valid only for very small
power impact and deviation from the operating state
– a large sudden impact may result in unstable state
even if the impact is less than the steady state power
limit
– the characteristic equation of determinant (sI-A) or
eigenvalue of A can tell the stability of system
– system is asymptotically stable iff eigenvalues of A are
in LHP
– in this case, eigenvalues of A are -1.3 6.0i
ENG164 Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution Systems 123
TRANSIENT STABILITY
• Transient stability
– to determine whether or not synchronism is maintained
after machine has been subject to severe disturbance
• Severe disturbance
– sudden application of loads (steel mill)
– loss of generation (unit trip)
– loss of large load (line trip)
– a fault on the system (lightning)
• System response after large disturbance
– oscillations of rotor angle result in large magnitude that
linearlization is not feasible
– must use nonlinear swing equation to solve the
problem
ENG164 Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution Systems 124
EQUAL AREA CRITERION
• Equal area criterion
– can be used to quickly predict system stability after
disturbance
– only applicable to a one-machine system connected to
an infinite bus or a two-machine system
• Derivation of rotor relative speed from swing
equation
– starting from the swing equation with damping
neglected
H d 2d
= Pm − Pe = Pa , Pa = acceleration power
f o dt 2
dt
=
H d (P
o
m − Pe )dd
d1
Pm0 a
d0
d0 d1 dmax t0 t
Equal Criteria: A1 = A2
(d maxcan
– dmax )sincalculated
− dobe d max + cosdby = cosd0 method
max iterative
– dd max
max d max
(k )
– we obtain dc
Pm
cosd c = (d max − d 0 ) + cosd max
Pmax Transmission and Distribution Systems
ENG164 Power Generation, 132
APPLICATION TO THREE PHASE
FAULT- NEAR SENDING END
2 H (d c − d 0 )
tc =
f 0 Pm
–updated solution: 2
dx dx
x1 = x0 + x = x0 + x0 + x1 t / 2
dt dt
–feature: better accuracy, but time step Δt should
be properly selected
ENG164 Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution Systems 137
NUMERICAL SOLUTION OF
NONLINEAR EQUATION
• Higher order equation
–use state space method to decompose higher
order equation
–use modified Euler method to solve state space
matrix
–for swing equation of second order, use 22
state space matrix to solve
x1 0 1 x1
x = 2 = x (t ) = Ax (t )
2 − n − 2n x2
j =1
ENG164 Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution Systems 141
MULTIMACHINE SYSTEMS
TRANSIENT STABILITY
• Classical transient stability study is based on the
application of the three-phase fault
• Swing equation of multi-machine system
H i d 2d i
j Yij cos( ij − d i + d j ) = Pmi − Pei
– m
f 0 dt 2
= Pmi −
j =1
Ei
'
E '
RLine LLine
CLine / 2 CLine / 2
Ics ICR
I
VS VR
C/2 C/2
···
Sending Receiving
end end
Inet1_short
Xnet1 RLine XLine
Vnet1_ln IL_short
ICS_short XCS XCL IL_short
• Given data:
VL_ll = Vline VL_ll = 500kV pfL = 0.8 ( lagging )
( )
PL1 PL ( )
j acos pfL
( )
SL1 PL =
pfL
e ( )
SL1 PL = 133.333+ 100jM V A
⎯
( )
SL1 PL
( )
IL PL = ( )
IL PL = 461.88 − 346.41jA
VL_n
• Capacitive current:
VL_n
ICL = ICL = 208.798jA
ZCL
• Line current
( ) ( )
ILine PL = ICL + IL PL ( )
ILine PL = 461.88 − 137.612jA
• Supply voltage:
( ) ( )
VS_n PL = VL_n + ILine PL ZLine ( )
VS_n PL = 308.156+ 55.926jkV
• Capacitive current:
( )
VS_n PL
( )
ICS PL =
ZCS
( )
ICS PL = −40.451 + 222.888jA
• Supply/network current
( ) ( )
Inet1 PL = ILine PL + ICS PL ( ) ( )
Inet1 PL = 421.429+ 85.276jA
B-A
Guadalupe
Blackwater
1.08
A
1.06
Voltage, pu
1.04
1.02
0.98 B
0.96
1.1
1.08
Voltage, pu
1.06
B
1.04 C
D
1.02
1
0 50 100 150 200
Miles from BA 345 kV station
Blackwater
BA voltage, Blackwater Line losses, BA Reactive Guadalupe
reactive power
pu voltage, pu MW Power, MVAr Reactors
MVAr
1.01 68 105 43
0.95 1.03 67 63 75 OFF
1.05 66 20 107
1.01 67 181 -52
1.00 1.03 65 139 -24 OFF
1.05 63 95 8
1.01 67 242 -77
1.03 1.03 64 198 -48 40 MVAr
1.05 62 154 -17
1.01 67 284 -91
40 and 65
1.05 1.03 64 240 -61
MVAr
1.05 62 195 -30
VS 345 3
VR = = = 222.5 − 0.69 kV
A 0.895110.69
VR LL = 385.4 kV (12% above nominal)
ENG164 Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution Systems 166
Long Transmission Line: Example 2
C) Receiving-end “no-load” voltage with 50 Mvar shunt
capacitor is inserted at the receiving end of the line
Q 50 106
YSHUNT =−j 2 =−j = − j 0.00042 S
V 345 10
2 6
0.895110.69 128.6884.11 1 0
ABCDTotal = −3 − 0.0004290 1
1.554 10 90.33 0.895110.69
0.94880.32 128.6884.11
= −3
1.178 10 90.21 0.895110.69
VS 345 3
VR = = = 209.93 − 0.32 kV
A 0.94880.32
VR LL = 363.6 kV (5% above nominal)
3 VR
VS 0.895110.69 128.6884.11 199.2 103 0
I = 1.554 10−3 90.33 0.895110.69
S 836.8 − 25.84
252.9 103 21.8
=
676 . 3 − 0 . 74
VS LL = 438.1 kV S S = VS I S = 158 + j 65.4 MVA S S 3 = 51322.5MVA