Cement L2
Cement L2
Cement L2
9-16
ISSN: 2186-2982 (P), 2186-2990 (O), Japan, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21660/2023.107.1671
Geotechnique, Construction Materials and Environment
*Corresponding Author, Received: 30 Nov. 2021 Revised: 22 May 2022, Accepted: 02 April 2023
ABSTRACT: The study examined the use of waste materials such as fly ash and bauxite laterite soil in
concrete to address waste disposal issues and reduce the cost of concrete products. Bauxite laterite soil is a
byproduct of aluminum extraction, while fly ash is a byproduct of coal-fired power plants. To produce bauxite
laterite concrete, 20% fly ash was utilized as a partial cement substitute, and 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% bauxite
laterite soil was utilized as a fine aggregate substitute. The mechanical properties of bauxite laterite concrete
were studied and compared to those of conventional concrete. The test results indicate that a 10 % substitution
of bauxite laterite soil is the optimal amount. After 28 days of curing, the mixture achieved a 58% improvement
in compressive strength compared to conventional concrete. In addition, bauxite laterite concrete exhibited
high early compressive strength and a unit weight decrease of between 6% and 8%. However, as more bauxite
laterite soil was incorporated into the mix, the concrete's workability decreased. Moreover, a Response Surface
Model was developed to predict the compressive strength of the bauxite laterite concrete. It can be inferred that
both bauxite laterite soil and fly ash are viable alternatives to fine aggregates and cement.
Keywords: Bauxite laterite soil, Fly-ash, Compressive strength, Response surface modeling, Philippines
9
International Journal of GEOMATE, July 2023, Vol. 25, Issue 107, pp.9-16
Mix (m3) LS0 LS10 LS20 LS30 LS40 3.3 Scanning Electron Microscope and Energy
Dispersive X-ray (SEM-EDX)
Water 0.205 0.205 0.205 0.205 0.205
Cement 0.092 0.092 0.092 0.092 0.092 A Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) was
Fly Ash 0.023 0.023 0.023 0.023 0.023 also performed to determine the shape of the
LS 0.000 0.030 0.061 0.091 0.122 particles and their interlocking in soil and to
examine the presence voids or micro cracking in
Gravel 0.358 0.358 0.358 0.358 0.358
the soil and concrete respectively. A magnification
Sand 0.303 0.270 0.240 0.210 0.180 of x1000 and x7500 will be used for SEM.
Lastly, an Energy Dispersive X-ray for the
10
International Journal of GEOMATE, July 2023, Vol. 25, Issue 107, pp.9-16
Bauxite Laterite Soil was performed to identify the A response surface plot is a useful tool for
chemical composition to expound on possible identifying the parameters that will yield the desired
chemical reactions between the various components response. An equality line was also used to validate
of the soil. the predicted versus the actual data.
3.4 Concrete Works and Tests
4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Concrete was cast and cured according to
ASTM C192 specifications, the sample matrix is 4.1 Index Tests
shown in Table 2.
The concrete mixtures were subjected to the To determine the particle size distribution of the
slump test before moulding. The slump test enables oven-dried specimen, sieve analysis was used. The
us to analyze and quantify the workability of fresh bulk of particles, 96.85%, that passed through the
concrete, allowing researchers to determine #4 sieve and were retained on the #200 sieve were
whether or not the concrete mixture has sufficient classed as sand and were used as a substitute for fine
water. To establish the slump height, the distance aggregate. Fines were identified as a very minor
between the top of the mold and the top of the percentage of the 0.97% that passed through the
concrete was measured. #200 sieve.
The soil is well-graded, as indicated by a
Table 2 Number of Specimen uniformity coefficient, Cu, of 9.09. Additionally,
the coefficient of curvature, Cc, the value of 0.9,
Days of Curing which is close to one, indicates that the delivered
Mix soil is well-graded sand. This is great for
7 14 21 28
substituting fine aggregates since it aids in the
Control 5 5 5 5 interlocking of particles, which is necessary for
LS0 5 5 5 5 concrete strength.
LS10 5 5 5 5 Bauxite laterite soil has a specific gravity of
LS20 5 5 5 5 2.05, which is lower than the specific gravity of fine
particles. The liquid limit is determined to be
LS30 5 5 5 5 50.61% water, whereas the plastic limit is
LS40 5 5 5 5 determined to be 35.92% water. The plasticity index
for this soil sample is 14.69%, indicating that it is
On the concrete sample, the Compressive of medium plasticity. The plasticity of the soil can
Strength of Concrete Test was performed (based on be attributed to the clay particles present in the soil
ASTM C39). The purpose of the test was to evaluate sample. The Atterberg limits was determined to
the sample's resistance to compressive forces up to establish the properties of bauxite laterite soil prior
the point of failure. to its application as fine aggregate replacement. It
The two bases of the concrete cylinder were has no quantifiable effect on the properties of
covered and positioned vertically within the concrete although it might affect the workability of
Universal Testing Machine. Subsequently, the fresh concrete due to the cohesiveness of bauxite
specimen was subjected to an axial compressive laterite concrete.
load until failure.
4.2 Scanning Electron Microscope and Energy
3.5 Response Surface Modelling Dispersive X-ray (SEM-EDX)
Lastly, a response surface model was used to The physical formation of bauxite laterite soil
create a forecasting model to determine which and bauxite laterite concrete was analyzed with a
variables have an impact on the compressive scanning electron microscope (SEM). It can be seen
strength of the concrete mixed with Laterite Soil, in the Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 that the soil particle in the
while providing a graph and an equation, the specimen that was going to be further examined and
parameters are shown in Table 3. magnified does not have any intragranular voids. In
addition to this, the soil particle has a densely
Table 3 Parameters used in the Response Surface packed structure with prominently sharp edges.
Modelling However, for the SEM analysis of the bauxite
laterite concrete revealed a large particle composed
Dependent Variable Independent Variable of sand, gravel, fly ash, cement, and bauxite laterite
Compressive soil, as depicted in Fig. 4. The presence of micro
Curing Days (days)
Strength of Bauxite cracking in Fig. 4 and voids in Fig. 5 throughout the
Laterite Concrete Amount of Bauxite specimen, which may explain the specimen's
(FC) Laterite Soil (%) relatively low strength compared to that of
11
International Journal of GEOMATE, July 2023, Vol. 25, Issue 107, pp.9-16
conventional concrete, is an important feature to soil sample contained four major mineral
note. Fig. 5 depicts a fly ash particle in the compounds: Aluminum (Al), Silica (Si), Iron (Fe),
foreground that is surrounded by very fine particles and Dysprosium (Dy), with Aluminum (Al) and
that are assumed to be cement hydration products. Iron (Fe) accounting for the majority of the
composition based on their atomic percentages.
12
International Journal of GEOMATE, July 2023, Vol. 25, Issue 107, pp.9-16
laterite soil and the bauxite laterite concrete. occurs in which there is the contraction of concrete
that ultimately increases the tensile stress within the
Table 4 Elemental Composition of Bauxite Laterite specimen. The internal tensile stress may cause
Soil cracking, warping and deflection even before
loading. The standard dimensions for the concrete
Element Atomic % specimens have small discrepancies of a few
millimeters which can be attributed to human error
Al 64.21
and shrinkage. Outliers are identified and removed
Si 9.91 if the data have deviations that go too far from the
Fe 15.03 behavioral trend.
Dy 10.85 The workability of bauxite laterite concrete
decreases in direct proportion to the percentage
The findings of the EDX analysis performed on substitution, as measured by the slump value,
the soil sample demonstrated the presence of the shown in Table 5. The concrete mix LS0 has the
fundamental elements of aluminum (Al) and iron maximum slump due to the addition of fly ash as a
(Fe), which justified its name of Bauxite Laterite plasticizer. On LS40, the lowest slump value was
soil. It has been established that laterite soil almost obtained. Due to the decreased workability of the
always contains aluminum and iron, albeit in concrete sample, shown in Fig. 7, the researchers
varying percentages depending on the type of parent mixed fresh concrete manually. During the mixing
rock. Silica (Si) was another element that was process, it became apparent that the workability
prevalent in the laterite soils, and it was discovered decreased due to the cohesiveness of the fresh
in the Bauxite Laterite soil that was used for the concrete.
research, as well. It is well known that silica is an
important element that can be found in cement, and Table 5 Slump Test Results
this significance is related to the properties of silica
that can induce bonding and strength in concrete. Specimen Slump (mm)
The composition of the Bauxite Laterite soil and Control 29
the effects of Iron, Aluminum, and Silica allowed LS0 37
for the interpretation of the effect of the Bauxite
Laterite soil on the properties of Concrete. Iron has LS10 23
properties that increase the strength of concrete, LS20 20
whereas aluminum decreases its strength. The LS30 15
presence of silica in cement is essential for the LS40 12
development of concrete's strength. Aluminum
dominates the elemental composition of Bauxite
Clay is a form of soil that has a greater capacity
Laterite soil, which explains the relatively weaker
for water retention than sandy soils [21]; this
strength properties of Bauxite Laterite concrete in
attribute of clay relates to the ability of laterite soil,
comparison to conventional concrete.
which is rich in clay minerals, to retain more water
than the ordinary sand used as fine aggregates in
4.3 Concrete Tests
concrete. It was learned during the mixing process
that water is progressively absorbed by the bauxite
Compressive tests were performed on concrete
laterite soil, drying portions of the concrete mix.
samples to investigate the effect of bauxite laterite
The control specimen failed in failure categories
soil as a partial substitution for fine aggregates and
I and II, and this is due to the concrete's brittleness.
fly ash as a 20% substitute for cement. Compressive
The failure modes observed for LS0 and bauxite
strength development was determined on concrete
laterite concrete are Type II and IV.
samples after 7, 14, 21, and 28 days of curing,
The average compressive strength of concrete
sample testing is shown in Fig. 6.
specimens was determined at various curing times.
The strength of concrete depends on many
The control specimen has an average strength of
variables such as its design mix, mixing proper and
24.24 MPa, which meets the structural concrete
overall handling. Losses should be anticipated and
minimum standards. The increased use of fine
accounted for since mechanical and human errors
particles weakens the concrete specimen. LS0 has
are expected to occur along the way. During the
the maximum compressive strength when compared
mixing proper, it is expected that there are
to bauxite laterite concrete, which has a
components losses such as those inside the concrete
compressive strength of 16.52 MPa. LS0 had a
mixer. It may affect the overall strength of the
compressive strength of just 68% of that of the
concrete specimen due to the disproportion of the
control specimen. The compressive strength of the
sand, gravel, cement and water. Loss of capillary
LS10 specimen was marginally lower at 13.42 MPa.
water in hardening concrete results in dry shrinkage
13
International Journal of GEOMATE, July 2023, Vol. 25, Issue 107, pp.9-16
14
International Journal of GEOMATE, July 2023, Vol. 25, Issue 107, pp.9-16
line was also used to validate the predicted versus hydrogen bubbles that ultimately cause micro-
the actual data, shown in Fig. 10. cracking within the specimen as affirmed by the
micrographs of bauxite laterite soil. Soil
micrographs of bauxite laterite soil indicate the
presence of angular particles.
Increased partial substitution of bauxite laterite
soil resulted in a decrease in the concrete's strength
and workability.
LS10 is the preferred substitution due to its
superior combination of compressive strength when
compared to the other percentage substitution
specimens. After seven days of curing, it regained
69.37% of its compressive strength. At 13.42 MPa,
the compressive strength of LS10 was 57.80% that
of the control sample. Due to the lower specific
gravity of bauxite laterite soil compared to river
sand, the unit weight of bauxite laterite concrete
Fig. 9 Response Surface Model Graph was up to 8% lighter than traditional concrete.
The study was able to create a response surface
model for the compressive strength of bauxite
laterite concrete for estimating the strength at a
given percent substitution of the laterite soil and
days of curing. The response surface model has an
R2 value of 0.7542 which shows an agreement
between the model and the observed parameters.
6. REFERENCES
15
International Journal of GEOMATE, July 2023, Vol. 25, Issue 107, pp.9-16
[7] Olabode O.P., San L.H., Analysis of soil concrete: high-order response surface
electrical resistivity and hydraulic conductivity methodology modeling approach. Engineering
relationship for characterisation of lithology with Computers, Vol. 38, 2022, pp. 1655–1668.
inducing slope instability in residual soil, [16] Amiri H., Azadi S., Karimaei M., Sadeghi H.,
International Journal of Geo-Engineering, Vol. & Farshad D., Multi-objective optimization of
14, Issue 1, 2023, pp. 1-16. coal waste recycling in concrete using response
[8] Qader Z.B., Karabash Z., Cabalar A.F., surface methodology. Journal of Building
Analyzing Geotechnical Characteristics of Soils Engineering, 2022, pp. 45.
in Erbil via GIS and ANNs, Sustainability [17] Nwose S. A., Edoziuno F. O., & Osuji S. O.,
(Switzerland), Vol. 15, Issue 5, 2023, pp. 1-40. Statistical analysis and Response Surface
[9] Mohamed M.H., Ahmed M., Mallick J., Modelling of the compressive strength
AlQadhi S., Finite Element Modeling of the inhibition of crude oil in concrete test cubes,
Soil-Nailing Process in Nailed-Soil Slopes, Algerian Journal of Engineering and
Applied Sciences (Switzerland), Vol. 13, Issue Technology, Vol. 4, 2021, pp. 99–107.
4, 2023, pp 1-27. [18] Wu Y., & Crawford J. E., Numerical Modeling
[10] Pasternak G., Zaczek-Peplinska J., Pasternak of Concrete Using a Partially Associative
K., Jóźwiak J., Pasik M., Koda E., Vaverková Plasticity Model, Journal of Engineering
M.D., Surface Monitoring of an MSW Landfill Mechanics, Vol. 141, Issue 12, 2015, pp.1-24.
Based on Linear and Angular Measurements, [19] Aziminezhad M., Mahdikhani M., &
TLS, and LIDAR UAV, Sensors, Vol. 23, Issue Memarpour M. M., RSM-based modeling and
4, 2023, pp 1-16. optimization of self-consolidating mortar to
[11] Pöllmann H., Composition of cement, predict acceptable ranges of rheological
Structure and Performance of Cements, Vol. properties, Construction and Building
1981, 2001, pp. 25–56. Materials, Vol. 189, 2018, pp. 1200–1213.
[12] Zhang D., Zhao J., Wang D., Wang Y., & Ma [20] Ai D., Lin C., Luo H., & Zhu H., Temperature
X., Influence of pozzolanic materials on the effect on electromechanical admittance–based
properties of natural hydraulic lime-based concrete structural health monitoring,
mortars, Construction and Building Materials, Structural Health Monitoring, Vol. 19, Issue 3,
2020, pp. 244. 2020, pp. 661–692.
[13] Galupino J., Adajar M. A., Uy E. E., Koa N. C., [21] Tzu-Hsing Ko, Nature and Properties of
Lao A. L., Lao R. N., & Tan J. C. M., Lateritic Soils Derived from Different Parent
Performance of concrete mixed with fly ash Materials in Taiwan, The Scientific World
and plastic when exposed to fire. International Journal, vol. 2014, 2014, pp. 1-4.
Journal of GEOMATE, Vol. 19, Issue 74, 2020, [22] Kakali G., Tsivilis S., Aggeli E., & Bati M.,
pp. 44-51. Hydration products of C3A, C3S and Portland
[14] Cadersa A. S., & Auckburally I., Use of cement in the presence of CaCO3. Cement and
Unprocessed Coal Bottom Ash as Partial Fine Concrete Research, Vol. 30, Issue 7, 2000, pp.
Aggregate Replacement in Concrete, 1073–1077.
University of Mauritius Research Journal, Vol.
Copyright © Int. J. of GEOMATE All rights reserved,
20, 2016, pp. 62–84.
including making copies, unless permission is obtained
[15] Hameed M. M., Alomar M. K., Baniya W. J., from the copyright proprietors.
& AlSaadi M. A., Prediction of high-strength
16