Ob Unit 2
Ob Unit 2
Ob Unit 2
MODULE-II
ATTITUDE:
Definition of Attitude
Attitude is the manner, disposition, feeling and position with regard to a person or thing, tendency or orientation
especially in the mind.
According to Gordon Allport, “An attitude is a mental and neural state of readiness, organized through
experience, exerting a directive or dynamic influence upon the individual’s response to all objects and situations
with which it is related.”
Frank Freeman said, “An attitude is a dispositional readiness to respond to certain institutions, persons or
objects in a consistent manner which has been learned and has become one’s typical mode of response.”
Individuals who have a positive attitude will pay attention to the good, rather than bad in people, situations,
events. A simple example of a positive attitude; when you are having a very bad run of luck but you still say
“Good Morning” rather than “What's so good about this morning”.
COMPONENTS ATTITUDE
Cognitive Component
The cognitive component of attitudes refers to the beliefs, thoughts, and attributes that we would associate with
an object. It is the opinion or belief segment of an attitude. It refers to that part of attitude which is related in
general knowledge of a person.
Typically these come to light in generalities or stereotypes, such as ‘all babies are cute’, ‘smoking is harmful to
health’ etc.
Affective Component
Affective component is the emotional or feeling segment of an attitude.
It is related to the statement which affects another person.
It deals with feelings or emotions that are brought to the surface about something, such as fear or hate. Using the
above example, someone might have the attitude that they love all babies because they are cute or that they hate
smoking because it is harmful to health.
Behavioral Component
Behavior component of an attitude consists of a person’s tendencies to behave’in a particular way toward an
object. It refers to that part of attitude which reflects the intention of a person in the short-run or long run.
Using the above example, the behavioral attitude maybe- ‘I cannot wait to kiss the baby’, or ‘we better keep
those smokers out of the library, etc.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BEHAVIOUR AND ATTITUDE
While attitude involves mind's predisposition to certain ideas, values, people, systems,
institutions; behaviour relates to the actual expression of feelings, action or inaction orally or/and through body
language. I am sure, others will look at these somewhat differently
In psychology, an attitude refers to a set of emotions, beliefs, and behaviors toward a particular object, person,
thing, or event. Attitudes are often the result of experience or upbringing, and they can have a
powerful influence over behavior. While attitudes are enduring, they can also change.
A work attitude behavior is the evaluations of one's job that constitute one's feelings toward, beliefs about, and
attachment to one's job. Overall work attitude attitude can be conceptualized in two ways. Either as effective job
satisfaction that constitutes a general or global subjective feeling about a job, or as a composite of objective
cognitive assessments of specific job facets, such as pay, conditions, opportunities and other aspects of a
particular job. Employees evaluate their advancement opportunities by observing their job, their occupation, and
their employer. While ;
Work behavior attitude often depends on how we feel about being there. Therefore, making sense of how people
behave depends on understanding their work attitudes. An attitude refers to our opinions, beliefs, and feelings
about aspects of our environment
PERSONALITY &VALUE
1. Heredity - Heredity refers to factors that are determined once an individual is born. An individual’s
physique, attractiveness, body type, complexion, body weight depend on his/her parents biological
makeup.
2. Environment - The environment to which an individual is subjected to during his growing years plays
an important role in determining his/her personality. The varied cultures in which we are brought up
and our family backgrounds have a crucial role in shaping our personalities.
3. Situation - An individual’s personality also changes with current circumstances and situations. An
individual would behave in a different way when he has enough savings with him and his behavior
would automatically change when he is bankrupt.
Low
Dislikes change
Does not enjoy new things
Resists new ideas
Not very imaginative
Dislikes abstract or theoretical concepts
Conscientiousness
Standard features of this dimension include high levels of thoughtfulness, good impulse control, and goal-
directed behaviors.1 Highly conscientious people tend to be organized and mindful of details. They plan ahead,
think about how their behavior affects others, and are mindful of deadlines.
High
Spends time preparing
Finishes important tasks right away
Pays attention to detail
Enjoys having a set schedule
Low
Dislikes structure and schedules
Makes messes and doesn't take care of things
Fails to return things or put them back where they belong
Procrastinates important tasks
Fails to complete necessary or assigned tasks
Extraversion
Extraversion (or extroversion) is characterized by excitability, sociability, talkativeness, assertiveness, and high
amounts of emotional expressiveness.1 People who are high in extraversion are outgoing and tend to gain energy
in social situations. Being around other people helps them feel energized and excited.
People who are low in extraversion (or introverted) tend to be more reserved and have less energy to expend in
social settings. Social events can feel draining and introverts often require a period of solitude and quiet in order
to "recharge."
High
Enjoys being the center of attention
Likes to start conversations
Enjoys meeting new people
Has a wide social circle of friends and acquaintances
Finds it easy to make new friends
Feels energized when around other people
Say things before thinking about them
Low
Prefers solitude
Feels exhausted when having to socialize a lot
Finds it difficult to start conversations
Dislikes making small talk
Carefully thinks things through before speaking
Dislikes being the center of attention
How Extroversion in Personality Influences Behavior
Agreeableness
This personality dimension includes attributes such as trust, altruism, kindness, affection, and other prosocial
behaviors.1 People who are high in agreeableness tend to be more cooperative while those low in this trait tend
to be more competitive and sometimes even manipulative.
High
Has a great deal of interest in other people
Cares about others
Feels empathy and concern for other people
Enjoys helping and contributing to the happiness of other people
Assists others who are in need of help
Low
Takes little interest in others
Doesn't care about how other people feel
Has little interest in other people's problems
Insults and belittles others
Manipulates others to get what they want
Neuroticism
Neuroticism is a trait characterized by sadness, moodiness, and emotional instability. 1 Individuals who are high
in this trait tend to experience mood swings, anxiety, irritability, and sadness. Those low in this trait tend to be
more stable and emotionally resilient.
High
Experiences a lot of stress
Worries about many different things
Gets upset easily
Experiences dramatic shifts in mood
Feels anxious
Struggles to bounce back after stressful events
Low
Emotionally stable
Deals well with stress
Rarely feels sad or depressed
Doesn't worry much
Is very relaxed
A manager needs to carry himself well. Whatever you wear daily to work, your team members would
automatically start following your style. Make sure you dress sensibly; after all you have to set an example
for your team members. Avoid wearing casuals and loud colours to work. Wear clothes which make you feel
confident and look good.
As a manager, one needs to be honest and fully committed towards the organization to expect loyalty
from team members in return. Do not treat your organization as a mere source of earning money. Discourage
your team members to backstab each other and spread unnecessary rumours about fellow workers.
Never be rude to any of your team members. Do not treat your employees as slaves. Appreciate employees who
perform exceptionally well. A pat on their back will go a long way in motivating them to perform even better
the next time. Put their names on notice boards to acknowledge their hard work.
Reach office on time. Being punctual is a great personality trait which makes you successful in a short span of
time. Ask your team members to reach office on time to avoid unnecessary late sittings. Late sittings do not
indicate that an employee is hard working but reflect his/her poor time management skills.
Leave your ego behind the moment you enter office. There is no place for ego and personal problems at
workplace. Do not hold personal grudges against anyone in your team. Avoid criticizing and making fun of
others.
As a manager, you need to be flexible in your approach. Be realistic. Don’t be surprised if your team
member asks for a half day or a full day leave on his/her birthday. After all it is a special day for him. Do not
stop him unless and until there is something really urgent at work.
Respect your team members. Every employee in the organization ought to be treated as one irrespective of
his/her designation or level in the hierarchy.
Be a patient listener. Lend a sympathetic ear to your team members in case of queries. Give them correct
feedbacks and timely monitor their performance.
PERCEPTION
Meaning and concept of Perception
Perception is an intellectual process of transforming sensory stimuli to meaningful information. It is the process
of interpreting something that we see or hear in our mind and use it later to judge and give a verdict on a
situation, person, group etc.
Perception depends on complex functions of the nervous system but subjectively seems mostly effortless
because this processing happens outside of conscious awareness.
According to Joseph Reitz; “Perception includes all those processes by which an individual receives information
about his environment—seeing, hearing, feeling, tasting and smelling.”
According to B. V. H. Gilmer, “Perception is the process of becoming aware of situations, of adding meaningful
associations to sensations.”
Organization
Once we have chosen to attend to a stimulus in the environment, the choice sets off a series of reactions in our
brain.
This neural process starts with the activation of our sensory receptors (touch, taste, smell, sight, and hearing).
Organizing is the second part of the perception process, in which we sort and categorize information that we
perceive based on innate and learned cognitive patterns.
Three ways we sort things into patterns are by using proximity, similarity, and difference (Stanley, mo).
Interpretation
After we have attended to a stimulus, and our brains have received and organized the information, we interpret it
in a way that makes sense using our existing information about the world Interpretation simply means that we
take the information that we have sensed and organized and turn it into something that we can categorize.
By putting different stimuli into categories, we can better understand and react to the world around us.
Perception of others involves sensing, organizing, and interpreting information about people, and what they say
and do. The sensation is a main characteristic of perception as it relates to outside input. In the perceptual
process, firstly the perceiver should select what will be perceived.
Then, the organization takes place when listeners identify the type of sound and compare it to other sounds
heard in the past.
Interpretation and categorization are generally the most subjective areas of perception, as they involve decisions
about whether listeners like what they hear and want to keep listening.
We make immediate evaluations that cause automatic judgments of positive and negative reactions toward
others, which occur outside of our awareness.
The selection, organization, and interpretation of perceptions can differ among different people.
On the basis of these, the perceptual output that means, values, attitudes, behavior, etc. of the perceiver may
differ.
Therefore, when people react differently in a situation, part of their behavior can be explained by examining
their perceptual process, and how their perceptions are leading to their responses.
Errors in Perception
As seen above perception is the process of analyzing and understanding a stimulus as it is.
But it may not be always possible to perceive the stimuli as they are.
Knowingly or unknowingly, we mistake the stimulus and perceive it wrongly.
Many times the prejudices in the individual, time of perception, unfavorable background, lack of clarity of stimulus,
confusion, conflict in mind and such other factors are responsible for errors in perception.
There are some errors in perception;
Illusion.
Hallucination.
Halo Effect.
Stereotyping.
Similarity.
Horn Effect.
Contrast.
Illusion
The illusion is a false perception. Here the person will mistake a stimulus and perceive it wrongly.
For example, in the dark, a rope is mistaken as a snake or vice versa. The voice of an unknown person is mistaken as a
friend’s voice. A person standing at a distance who is not known may be perceived as a known person.
Hallucination
Sometimes we come across instances where the individual perceives some stimulus, even when it is not present.
This phenomenon is known as a hallucination. The person may see an object, person, etc. or he may listen to some voice
though there are no objects and sounds in reality.
Selective Perception
Selective perception means the situation when people selectively interpret what they see on the basis of their interests,
background, experience, and attitudes.
It means any characteristics that make a person, object, or event stand out will increase the probability that it will be
perceived.
Because it is impossible for us to assimilate everything we see, only certain stimuli can be taken in.
Halo Effect
The individual is evaluated on the basis of perceived positive quality, feature or trait. When we draw a general impression
about an individual on the basis of a single characteristic, such as intelligence, sociability, or appearance, a halo effect is
operating.
In other words, this is the tendency to rate a man uniformly high or low in other traits if he is extraordinarily high or low in
one particular trait: If a worker has few absences, his supervisor might give him a high rating in all other areas of work.
Stereotyping
People usually can fall into at least one general category based on physical or behavioral traits then they will be evaluated.
When we judge someone on the basis of our perception of the group to which he or she belongs, we are using the shortcut
called stereotyping.
or example, a boss might assume that a worker from a Middle East country is lazy and cannot meet performance objectives,
even if the worker tried his best.
Similarity
Often, people tend to seek out and rate more positively those who are similar to themselves. This tendency to approve of
similarity may cause evaluators to give better ratings to employees who exhibit the same interests, work methods, points of
view or standards.
Horn Effect
When the individual is completely evaluated on the basis of a negative quality or feature perceived. This results in an overall
lower rating than an acceptable rate.
He is not formally dressed up in the office, that’s why he may be casual at work too.
Contrast
The tendency to rate people relative to other people rather than to the individual performance he or she is doing. Rather will
evaluate an employee by comparing that employee’s performance with other employees.
In the early 20th Century, Wilhelm Wundt identified contrast as a fundamental principle of perception, and since then the
effect has been confirmed in many different areas.
These effects shape not only visual qualities like color and brightness but other kinds of perception, including how heavy an
object feels. One experiment found that thinking of the name “Hitler” led to subjects rating a person as more hostile.
Basically, we use the above shortcuts when we judge others. Perceiving and interpreting what others do is burdensome. As a
result, individuals develop techniques for making the task more manageable.
These techniques are frequently valuable-they allow us to make accurate perceptions rapidly and provide valid data for
making projections. But sometimes it also creates problems.
Because firstly, we have said that these are the shortcuts.
In these ways, we can judge others in a short period of time but sometimes we mistakenly judge others by these shortcuts.
MOTIVATION
Theories of Motivation
Content Theories of Motivation
Maslow’s theory of the hierarchy of needs, Alderfer’s ERG theory, McClelland’s achievement motivation
theory, and Herzberg’s two-factor theory focused on what motivates people and addressed specific factors like
individual needs and goals.
The most recognized content theory of motivation is that of Abraham Maslow, who explained motivation
through the satisfaction of needs arranged in a hierarchical order. As satisfied needs do not motivate, it is the
dissatisfaction that moves us in the direction of fulfillment.
Needs are conditions within the individual that are essential and necessary for the maintenance of life and the
nurturance of growth and well-being. Hunger and thirst exemplify two biological needs that arise from the
body’s requirement for food and water. These are required nutriments for the maintenance of life.
Competence and belongingness exemplify two psychological needs that arise from the self’s requirement for
environmental mastery and warm interpersonal relationships. These are required nutriments for growth and
well-being.
generating wants, desires, and strivings that motivate whatever behaviors are necessary for the
maintenance of life and the promotion of growth and well-being, and
generating a deep sense of need satisfaction from doing so.
Maslow’s legacy is the order of needs progressing in the ever-increasing complexity, starting with basic
physiological and psychological needs and ending with the need for self-actualization. While basic needs are
experienced as a sense of deficiency, the higher needs are experienced more in terms of the need for growth and
fulfillment.
In essence, he believed that once a given level of need is satisfied, it no longer serves to motivate man. Then, the
next higher level of need has to be activated in order to motivate the man. Maslow identified five levels in his
need hierarchy as shown in figure 17.2.
These are now discussed one by one:
1. Physiological Needs
These needs are basic to human life and, hence, include food, clothing, shelter, air, water and necessities of life.
These needs relate to the survival and maintenance of human life. They exert tremendous influence on human
behaviour. These needs are to be met first at least partly before higher level needs emerge. Once physiological
needs are satisfied, they no longer motivate the man.
2. Safety Needs:
After satisfying the physiological needs, the next needs felt are called safety and security needs. These needs
find expression in such desires as economic security and protection from physical dangers. Meeting these needs
requires more money and, hence, the individual is prompted to work more. Like physiological needs, these
become inactive once they are satisfied.
3. Social Needs:
Man is a social being. He is, therefore, interested in social interaction, companionship, belongingness, etc. It is
this socialising and belongingness why individuals prefer to work in groups and especially older people go to
work.
4. Esteem Needs:
These needs refer to self-esteem and self-respect. They include such needs which indicate self-confidence,
achievement, competence, knowledge and independence. The fulfillment of esteem needs leads to self-
confidence, strength and capability of being useful in the organisation. However, inability to fulfill these needs
results in feeling like inferiority, weakness and helplessness.
5. Self-Actualisation Needs
This level represents the culmination of all the lower, intermediate, and higher needs of human beings. In other
words, the final step under the need hierarchy model is the need for self-actualization. This refers to fulfillment.
The term self-actualization was coined by Kurt Goldstein and means to become actualized in what one is
potentially good at. In effect, self- actualization is the person’s motivation to transform perception of self into
reality.
According to Maslow, the human needs follow a definite sequence of domination. The second need does not
arise until the first is reasonably satisfied, and the third need does not emerge until the first two needs have been
reasonably satisfied and it goes on. The other side of the need hierarchy is that human needs are unlimited.
However, Maslow’s need hierarchy-theory is not without its detractors.
2. The need priority model may not apply at all times in all places.
3. Researches show that man’s behaviour at any time is mostly guided by multiplicity of behaviour. Hence,
Maslow’s preposition that one need is satisfied at one time is also of doubtful validity.
4. In case of some people, the level of motivation may be permanently lower. For example, a person suffering
from chronic unemployment may remain satisfied for the rest of his life if only he/she can get enough food.
Notwithstanding, Maslow’s need hierarchy theory has received wide recognition, particularly among practicing
managers. This can be attributed to the theory’s intuitive logic and easy to understand. One researcher came to
the conclusion that theories that are intuitively strong die hard’.
(2) When did you feel exceptionally bad about your job? He used the critical incident method of obtaining data.
The responses when analysed were found quite interesting and fairly consistent. The replies respondents gave
when they felt good about their jobs were significantly different from the replies given when they felt bad.
Reported good feelings were generally associated with job satisfaction, whereas bad feeling with job
dissatisfaction. Herzberg labelled the job satisfiers motivators, and he called job dissatisfies hygiene or
maintenance factors. Taken together, the motivators and hygiene factors have become known as Herzberg’s
two-factor theory of motivation
Herzberg’s motivational and hygiene factors have been shown in the Table 17.1
According to Herzberg, the opposite of satisfaction is not dissatisfaction. The underlying reason, he says, is that
removal of dissatisfying characteristics from a job does not necessarily make the job satisfying. He believes in
the existence of a dual continuum. The opposite of ‘satisfaction’ is ‘no satisfaction’ and the opposite of
‘dissatisfaction’ is ‘no dissatisatisfaction’.
According to Herzberg, today’s motivators are tomorrow’s hygiene because the latter stop influencing the
behaviour of persons when they get them. Accordingly, one’s hygiene may be the motivator of another.
3. Even job satisfaction is not measured on an overall basis. It is not unlikely that a person may dislike part of
his/ her job, still thinks the job acceptable.
Because of its ubiquitous nature, salary commonly shows up as a motivator as well as hygine.
Regardless of criticism, Herzberg’s ‘two-factor motivation theory’ has been widely read and a few managers
seem untaminar with his recommendations. The main use of his recommendations lies in planning and
controlling of employees work.
THE PROCESS THEORY
The relationships between notions of effort, performance, and reward are depicted in
Figure 17.3
2. Expectancy:
It relates efforts to performance.
3. Instrumentality:
By instrumentality, Vroom means, the belief that performance is related to rewards.
Thus, Vroom’s motivation can also be expressed in the form of an equation as follows:
Motivation = Valence x Expectancy x Instrumentality
Being the model multiplicative in nature, all the three variables must have high positive
values to imply motivated performance choice. If any one of the variables approaches to
zero level, the possibility of the so motivated performance also touches zero level.
However, Vroom’s expectancy theory has its critics. The important ones are:
1. Critics like Porter and Lawler lebeled it as a theory of cognitive hedonism which
proposes that individual cognitively chooses the course of action that leads to the
greatest degree of pleasure or the smallest degree of pain.
2. The assumption that people are rational and calculating makes the theory idealistic.
3. The expectancy theory does not describe individual and situational differences.
But the valence or value people place on various rewards varies. For example, one
employee prefers salary to benefits, whereas another person prefers to just the reverse.
The valence for the same reward varies from situation to situation.
In spite of all these critics, the greatest point in me expectancy theory is that it explains
why significant segment of workforce exerts low levels of efforts in carrying out job
responsibilities.
What is the main point in Porter and Lawler’s model is that effort or motivation does not
lead directly to performance. It is intact, mediated by abilities and traits and by role
perceptions. Ultimately, performance leads to satisfaction,. The same is depicted in the
following Fig 17.4.
There are three main elements in this model. Let us briefly discuss these one by one.
Effort:
Effort refers to the amount of energy an employee exerts on a given task. How much
effort an employee will put in a task is determined by two factors-
Performance:
One’s effort leads to his/her performance. Both may be equal or may not be. However
the amount of performance is determined by the amount of labour and the ability and
role perception of the employee. Thus, if an employee possesses less ability and/or
makes wrong role perception, his/her performance may be low in spite of his putting in
great efforts.
Satisfaction:
Performance leads to satisfaction. The level of satisfaction depends upon the amount of
rewards one achieves. If the amount of actual rewards meet or exceed perceived
equitable rewards, the employee will feel satisfied. On the country, if actual rewards fall
short of perceived ones, he/she will be dissatisfied.
There is no denying of the fact that the motivation model proposed by Porter and Lawler
is quite complex than other models of motivation. In fact motivation itself is not a simple
cause-effect relationship rather it is a complex phenomenon Porter and Lawler have
attempted to measure variables such as the values of possible rewards, the perception
of effort-rewards probabilities and role perceptions in deriving satisfaction.
They recommended that the managers should carefully reassess their reward system
and structure. The effort-performance-reward-satisfaction should be made integral to
the entire system of managing men in organisation.
Contemporary theories
Everyone in the workplace is motivated by something. This motivation could be external in nature, such a
money, and status, or internal, such as a desire to do a good job. Leaders and managers have sought to
understand theories of motivation and then test them in the workplace to increase the productivity and
effectiveness of their workforce.
John Stacey Adams' equity theory helps explain why pay and conditions alone do not determine motivation. It
also explains why giving one person a promotion or pay-rise can have a demotivating effect on others.
When people feel fairly or advantageously treated they are more likely to be motivated; when they feel unfairly
treated they are highly prone to feelings of disaffection and demotivation.
Employees seek to maintain equity between the inputs that they bring to a job and the outcomes that they
receive from it against the perceived inputs and outcomes of others. The belief in equity theory is that people
value fair treatment which causes them to be motivated to keep the fairness maintained within the relationships
of their co-workers and the organization.
Words like efforts and rewards, or work and pay, are an over-simplification - hence the use of the terms inputs
and outputs. Inputs are logically what we give or put into our work. Outputs are everything we take out in
return.
Inputs
This equity theory term ecompasses the quality and quantity of the employees contributions to his or her work.
Typical inputs include time, effort, loyalty, hard work, commitment, ability, adaptability, flexibility, tolerance,
determination, enthusiasm, personal sacrifice, trust in superiors, support from co-workers and colleagues, skill...
Outputs
Outputs in equity theory are defined as the positive and negative consequences that an individual perceives a
participant has incurred as a consequence of his/her relationship with another. Outputs can be both tangible and
intangible. Typical outcomes are job security, esteem, salary, employee benefits, expenses, recognition,
reputation, responsibility, sense of achievement, praise, thanks, stimuli...
It's all about the money
Payment however, is the main concern and therefore the cause of equity or inequity in most cases. In any
position, an employee wants to feel that their contributions and work performance are being rewarded with their
pay. According to equity theory, if an employee feels underpaid then it will result in the employee feeling
hostile towards the organization and perhaps their co-workers, which may result the employee not performing
well at work anymore.
It's the subtle variables that also play an important role for the feeling of equity. Just the idea of recognition for
the job performance and the mere act of thanking the employee will cause a feeling of satisfaction and therefore
help the employee feel worthwhile and have more outcomes.
Perception of equity
But Adams' Equity Theory is a far more complex and sophisticated motivational model than merely assessing
effort (inputs) and reward (outputs). Equity Theory adds a crucial additional perspective of comparison with
'referent' others (people we consider in a similar situation). 'Referent' others are used to describe the reference
points or people with whom we compare our own situation, which is the pivotal part of the theory.
Equity does not depend on our input-to-output ratio alone - it depends on our comparison between our ratio and
the ratio of others. We form perceptions of what constitutes a fair ratio (a balance or trade) of inputs and outputs
by comparing our own situation with other 'referents' (reference points or examples) in the market place as we
see it. If we feel are that inputs are fairly rewarded by outputs (the fairness benchmark being subjectively
perceived from market norms and other comparable references) then generally we are happier in our work and
more motivated to continue inputting at the same level.
If we feel, however, that our ratio of inputs to outputs is less beneficial than the ratio enjoyed by referent others,
then we become demotivated in relation to our job and employer.
In practice this helps to explain why people are so strongly affected by the situations (and views and gossip) of
colleagues, friends, partners etc., in establishing their own personal sense of fairness or equity in their work
situations.
Equity Theory explains why people can be happy and motivated by their situation one day, and yet with no
change to their terms and working conditions can be made very unhappy and demotivated, if they learn for
example that a colleague (or worse an entire group) is enjoying a better reward-to-effort ratio.
This also explains why and how full-time employees will compare their situations and input-to-output ratios
with part-time colleagues, who very probably earn less, however it is the ratio of input-to-output - reward-to-
effort - which counts, and if the part-timer is perceived to enjoy a more advantageous ratio, then so this will
have a negative effect on the full-timer's sense of Equity, and with it, their personal motivation.