Sazzad

Question 1: What is sociology?

Answer:

Sociology is the study of how people live and interact in groups and societies. It looks at how relationships
between people shape their behavior and how societies change over time. According to Giddens, sociology is
about observing how people interact, and Schaefer says it's the study of social behavior and groups, focusing on
how relationships affect behavior.

Question 2: What does it mean for sociology to be scientific?

Answer:

For sociology to be scientific means it uses careful, organized methods to study people and how they interact.
Like other sciences, sociology relies on observing and collecting information in a systematic way. It is part of a
group of social sciences, like anthropology, economics, and psychology, which all study human behavior.
Sociologists look at people and their relationships to understand how society works.

Question 3: Why is sociology important?

Answer:

Sociology is important because it helps us understand the fast-changing world we live in, with its conflicts,
inequalities, and differences. It teaches us to see things from different viewpoints, understand other cultures, and
think about how decisions and policies affect society. Sociology also helps people make sense of their own lives
by connecting personal experiences to larger social issues. It helps answer questions like why the world is the way
it is, why life changes from one generation to another, and where societies might be headed in the future.

Question 4: What is sociological imagination, and why is it significant?

Answer:

Sociological imagination, a concept created by C. Wright Mills in 1970, is the ability to step away from your
personal life and see things in a larger social context. It helps people look beyond their everyday routines and view
them from a new, more objective perspective. This way of thinking helps sociologists understand how personal
experiences are connected to bigger social issues, giving insights into how individual problems may be linked to
larger social structures.

Question 5: What are the main factors that contributed to the emergence of sociology?
Answer:

Sociology began during the 18th and 19th centuries because of major changes in society. The main reasons for
its emergence include:
1
 Sazzad
1. The French Revolution (1789): This revolution caused big political and social changes, making people
question how societies should be organized.

2. The Industrial Revolution: As societies moved from farming to factories, people's lives changed, and new
social problems like class divisions and crowded cities appeared. These needed to be studied.

3. The Rise of Natural Sciences: Success in sciences like physics and chemistry inspired early sociologists
to study society using similar methods.

4. Colonialism and Globalization: As countries explored and controlled other parts of the world, they
encountered different cultures. This made scholars want to compare and understand different societies.

These factors helped create the field of sociology to better understand how social forces shape people and
societies.

Question 1: How would the Functionalist perspective explain the recent revolution
and the current interim government in my country?
Answer:

From the Functionalist perspective, society is seen as a system with interconnected parts, each serving a purpose
to maintain stability. According to this theory, revolutions can be seen as a response to dysfunctions within the
societal system. The revolution in your country could be interpreted as a sign that certain parts of society, such
as political structures or economic systems, were no longer fulfilling their functions adequately, leading to
instability. The interim government, from this view, may represent a temporary effort to restore balance and
address the dysfunction by reorganizing societal structures to bring stability and order back to the system.

From a Functionalist perspective, society is like a system where all parts work together to keep things stable.
When a revolution happens, it's seen as a response to problems or dysfunctions in the system. In your country,
this might mean that parts of society, like the political or economic systems, weren’t working well enough, causing
instability. The interim government can be viewed as a temporary solution aimed at fixing these issues and
bringing society back into balance.

Question 2: How does the Conflict Perspective explain the causes of the revolution in my
country?
Answer:

The Conflict Perspective, inspired by the works of Karl Marx, focuses on the struggles between different social
classes or groups with unequal power and resources. From this viewpoint, the revolution in your country may be
seen as a result of ongoing tensions between the ruling class (those in power) and the oppressed groups (those
without power). These groups could be fighting for greater equality, access to resources, or political
representation. The interim government might be viewed as a temporary compromise or result of negotiations
2
 Sazzad
between these conflicting groups, though the conflict perspective would suggest that true resolution can only
occur if the underlying inequalities are addressed.

The Conflict Perspective, based on Karl Marx’s ideas, looks at society as a place of struggle between groups with
unequal power and resources. In this view, the revolution in your country might be seen as a clash between the
ruling class (those with power) and the oppressed (those without power). These groups could be fighting for more
equality, better access to resources, or a fair share in politics. The interim government could be seen as a
temporary solution, but according to this perspective, real peace will only come if the deeper inequalities are
fixed.

Question 3: How would the Symbolic Interactionist perspective view the role of
symbols in the revolution and the establishment of the interim government?
Answer:

The Symbolic Interactionist perspective focuses on the meanings individuals and groups attach to symbols and
interactions. In the context of the revolution, this perspective might examine how certain symbols (e.g., flags,
slogans, or leaders) inspired collective action and mobilized people for the cause. It would also look at how
individuals' perceptions of the government changed, leading to collective redefinitions of what is considered
legitimate authority. The interim government could be seen as symbolizing a new beginning or transition, and its
success or failure could depend on how citizens interpret its legitimacy and actions in their daily interactions.

The Symbolic Interactionist perspective looks at how people give meaning to symbols and their interactions.
During the revolution, this view would explore how symbols like flags, slogans, or leaders motivated people to
come together for a cause. It would also examine how people's views of the government changed, affecting their
ideas about what makes authority legitimate. The interim government might represent a fresh start or change, and
its success would depend on how citizens see its legitimacy and actions in their everyday lives.

Question 4: How does the historical context of revolutions, such as the French
Revolution, relate to the current political situation in my country?
Answer:

Sociologists often refer to historical events like the French Revolution to understand modern societal changes.
Like the French Revolution, which challenged the old regimes and introduced new political ideas about
democracy and rights, the recent revolution in your country may be seen as part of a broader historical pattern
where oppressed populations rise against perceived injustices. The creation of an interim government can be
compared to transitional phases in other revolutions, where old systems are dismantled, and new structures are
slowly put into place. This period is often marked by uncertainty, but also by the possibility of profound societal
change.

3
 Sazzad
Sociologists often look at events like the French Revolution to understand changes in today’s society. Just as the
French Revolution challenged old systems and introduced new ideas about democracy and rights, the recent
revolution in your country can be seen as part of a pattern where oppressed people stand up against injustices.
The formation of an interim government is similar to what happens in other revolutions, where old systems are
broken down and new ones are gradually set up. This time can be uncertain but also holds the potential for major
changes in society.

Question 1: How would the Functionalist perspective explain the recent revolution
and the current interim government in my country?
Answer:

The Functionalist perspective views society as a system made up of various parts, each fulfilling a specific
function to maintain stability and order. This theory suggests that social institutions—such as the government,
economy, education, and family—are essential components that work together to meet the needs of society.
When one or more parts of this system fail to perform their function properly, the overall stability of society is
threatened, leading to social unrest or even revolutionary change.

In the context of the recent revolution in your country, a Functionalist would argue that the revolution occurred
because certain institutions were no longer performing their intended roles effectively, creating dysfunction within
the system. This dysfunction could be due to various reasons: economic inequality, corruption in government,
lack of political representation, or widespread social discontent. When these institutions fail to adapt to the
changing needs of society, they generate a strain on the system, leading to instability.

The revolution, therefore, can be seen as society’s way of trying to restore balance. It may have been a response
to widespread dissatisfaction with the government or economic policies that were no longer serving the majority
of the population. The revolution signifies that the old system was unable to maintain the necessary equilibrium,
prompting a need for change.

The establishment of an interim government can be viewed through the Functionalist lens as an attempt to restore
order and stability in the aftermath of the revolution. From this perspective, the interim government is a temporary
mechanism designed to reorganize society's structures, allowing for the creation of new institutions or the reform
of existing ones to better fulfill their functions. It represents a societal effort to re-establish equilibrium by
addressing the dysfunctions that led to the revolution in the first place.

However, Functionalists would also be concerned about the long-term stability of the interim government. If it can
successfully reintegrate the various parts of society and provide solutions to the problems that caused the
revolution, it can lead to a more stable and functioning society. If it fails to address these issues, further instability
and social unrest may arise, continuing the cycle of dysfunction.

In summary, the Functionalist perspective views the revolution as a response to institutional dysfunction, and the
interim government as a necessary step to restore order, rebuild functioning institutions, and re-establish societal
equilibrium.
4
 Sazzad

The Functionalist perspective sees society as a system with different parts, like the government, economy, and
family, each doing a job to keep society stable and orderly. When these parts don’t work well, it can cause
problems and make society unstable, sometimes leading to a revolution.

In your country, the Functionalist perspective would say the revolution happened because some parts of society,
like the government, were not doing their job well. This might be because of things like economic inequality,
corruption, or people feeling like they had no say in the government. These problems made society unstable and
led to the revolution as people tried to fix these issues.

The interim government that was set up after the revolution is seen as a way to restore order and stability. It's a
temporary solution to help reorganize society and fix the problems that caused the revolution. The goal is to create
or reform institutions so they work better and make society stable again.

The interim government needs to solve these problems to make society stable in the long run. If it succeeds,
society will become more stable. If it fails, there might be more problems and unrest.

In simple terms, the Functionalist perspective sees the revolution as a way to fix broken parts of society and the
interim government as a step to bring back order and stability.

Question 2: How does the Conflict Perspective explain the causes of the revolution in
my country?
Answer:

The Conflict Perspective, rooted in the ideas of Karl Marx, focuses on the inherent inequalities within society and
the struggles between different social classes or groups for power and resources. This theory views society as
being in a constant state of tension and competition, with the wealthy and powerful elites maintaining control
over the resources, while the lower classes or marginalized groups are systematically oppressed. Conflict
theorists argue that social change, including revolutions, is the result of these ongoing struggles for power and
resources.

Applying this theory to your country's revolution, a Conflict theorist would argue that the revolution is the
culmination of long-standing tensions between the ruling elite and the majority of the population. These tensions
are likely rooted in economic inequality, political corruption, and the exclusion of certain groups from decision-
making processes. Over time, the disparity between the "haves" and the "have-nots" reaches a breaking point,
where the oppressed groups begin to resist and challenge the existing power structures.

For instance, if the government in your country had been monopolizing resources and wealth, leaving the majority
of people in poverty, this would create deep social divides. The ruling class may have used its control over political
institutions, the economy, and even the media to maintain their dominance, suppressing any dissent. However,
as social frustrations mount—perhaps due to rising unemployment, lack of access to healthcare, education, or
basic human rights—people begin to see the existing system as unjust and illegitimate. The revolution then
becomes an expression of this frustration, a way for the marginalized groups to fight for their rights, wealth
redistribution, and social justice.

5
 Sazzad
The establishment of the interim government could be seen through this lens as a temporary response to the
demands of the oppressed groups. However, Conflict theorists would argue that unless the underlying issues of
inequality are addressed, the interim government may not lead to lasting peace or justice. In fact, they might view
the interim government as a tool of the elite to temporarily appease the masses, while maintaining control behind
the scenes. If the new government doesn't enact significant structural changes—such as land reforms, wealth
redistribution, or increased political participation for the marginalized groups—conflict theorists would predict
that the tensions will resurface, potentially leading to another wave of conflict or revolution.

Ultimately, the Conflict Perspective highlights that the revolution is a result of systemic inequalities, and the
interim government is merely a temporary phase in the ongoing struggle between the powerful and the oppressed.
Real change, according to this perspective, can only come from a radical restructuring of society to address these
deep-rooted inequalities.

The Conflict Perspective, based on Karl Marx's ideas, looks at society as being full of inequalities and conflicts
between different groups. It sees the rich and powerful as controlling resources, while the poor and less powerful
are oppressed. According to this view, social changes, including revolutions, happen because of these ongoing
struggles for power and resources.

In the case of your country's revolution, a Conflict theorist would say it happened because of long-term tensions
between the ruling elite and the majority of the people. These tensions are often due to economic inequality,
political corruption, and some groups being left out of important decisions. Over time, the gap between the rich
and the poor grows, and the oppressed groups start to resist and challenge the power of the elites.

For example, if the government was keeping most of the wealth and resources for itself while leaving many people
in poverty, this would create deep social divides. The ruling class might control political institutions, the economy,
and the media to stay in power and suppress any opposition. But as more people lose jobs, struggle to access
healthcare, education, and basic human rights, they see the system as unfair. The revolution then becomes a way
for these marginalized groups to fight for their rights, fair distribution of wealth, and social justice.

The interim government, set up after the revolution, is seen as a temporary response to the demands of the
oppressed groups. But Conflict theorists would argue that if the interim government does not address the root
causes of inequality, it won’t bring lasting peace or justice. They might view the interim government as a way for
the elites to calm the masses while keeping their control. If the new government does not make big changes, like
land reforms, fair wealth distribution, or more political participation for marginalized groups, Conflict theorists
predict that the tensions will come back, possibly leading to more conflict or another revolution.

In simple terms, the Conflict Perspective sees the revolution as caused by deep inequalities, and the interim
government as a temporary solution. Real change, according to this view, requires major restructuring of society
to fix these deep-rooted inequalities.
6
 Sazzad
Question 3: How would the Symbolic Interactionist perspective view the role of
symbols in the revolution and the establishment of the interim government?
Answer:

The Symbolic Interactionist perspective focuses on the ways individuals and groups create meaning through their
interactions and how these meanings shape social realities. Unlike the large-scale views of Functionalism and
Conflict Theory, Symbolic Interactionism zooms in on the micro-level of society, examining how people’s everyday
interactions and the symbols they use influence social processes.

In the context of the recent revolution in your country, Symbolic Interactionists would be particularly interested in
the role that symbols, language, and shared meanings played in uniting people and mobilizing them for collective
action. Symbols such as flags, slogans, speeches, and even social media hashtags can take on powerful
meanings that resonate with people's emotions and identities. For instance, a flag might come to symbolize
resistance, freedom, or unity, while a particular slogan might encapsulate the grievances of the people and inspire
action.

In the revolution, leaders and protestors likely used these symbols to communicate their dissatisfaction with the
current regime and to build a sense of solidarity among diverse groups. The shared understanding of these
symbols helped people from different backgrounds and social classes come together around a common cause.
For example, a rallying cry such as "Freedom for All" might have united people across ethnic, economic, and
geographic divides, as they came to see themselves as part of a larger movement for justice and change.

Symbolic Interactionists would also examine how the perception of authority changed during the revolution. In
the period leading up to the revolution, people might have viewed the government as a legitimate authority figure.
However, as symbols of corruption or oppression became associated with the ruling class, the public's perception
of the government changed. Leaders who were once seen as protectors of order might now be seen as enemies
of the people. This shift in perception is crucial for understanding how revolutions gain momentum—it's not just
about economic or political factors, but also about how people interpret and make sense of their experiences in
relation to the symbols around them.

The interim government that has been established would also be a subject of interest for Symbolic Interactionists.
How do people view this new government? What symbols or narratives are used to legitimize or delegitimize it? If
the interim government is seen as a symbol of hope and renewal, it may gain widespread support. However, if
people view it as a continuation of the old regime, merely dressed in new clothes, it may struggle to gain
legitimacy. Interactionists would focus on how the everyday interactions between citizens and government
officials, as well as the symbols used by the new government, shape its success or failure in restoring order and
trust.

In conclusion, the Symbolic Interactionist perspective highlights the importance of symbols and shared meanings
in driving the revolution and shaping the public's perception of the interim government. It emphasizes the micro-
level interactions and the power of symbols to unite or divide people in times of political upheaval.

The Symbolic Interactionist perspective looks at how people create and share meanings through their
interactions. It focuses on small-scale, everyday interactions and the symbols people use.

7
 Sazzad
In your country's revolution, Symbolic Interactionists would pay attention to how symbols, language, and shared
meanings helped unite people and push them to act together. Symbols like flags, slogans, speeches, and social
media hashtags can have strong meanings that connect with people’s emotions and identities. For example, a
flag might symbolize freedom or unity, and a slogan could express the people's grievances and inspire action.

During the revolution, leaders and protesters likely used these symbols to show their dissatisfaction with the
government and build a sense of togetherness among different groups. These shared symbols helped people from
various backgrounds and social classes come together for a common cause. For instance, a rallying cry like
"Freedom for All" might have united people across different ethnic, economic, and geographic lines, making them
feel part of a larger movement for change.

Symbolic Interactionists would also look at how people's views of authority changed during the revolution. Before
the revolution, people might have seen the government as a legitimate authority. But as symbols of corruption or
oppression became linked with the ruling class, people’s views of the government changed. Leaders who were
once seen as protectors might now be seen as enemies. This change in perception helps explain how revolutions
gain support—not just through economic or political reasons, but also through how people interpret their
experiences with these symbols.

The interim government set up after the revolution would also interest Symbolic Interactionists. They would ask:
How do people view this new government? What symbols or stories are used to make it seem legitimate or not? If
the interim government is seen as a symbol of hope and new beginnings, it might get a lot of support. But if people
see it as just a continuation of the old regime with a new look, it might struggle to gain trust. Interactionists would
focus on how everyday interactions between citizens and government officials, and the symbols used by the new
government, affect its success or failure in restoring order and trust.

In simple terms, the Symbolic Interactionist perspective highlights how important symbols and shared meanings
are in driving the revolution and shaping how people see the interim government. It looks at the small-scale
interactions and the power of symbols to bring people together or divide them in times of political change.

Question 4: How does the historical context of revolutions, such as the French
Revolution, relate to the current political situation in my country?
Answer:

To understand the recent revolution in your country, it's useful to look at it through the lens of historical
revolutions, such as the French Revolution of 1789. The French Revolution is one of the most studied and
influential revolutions in modern history, and it provides a valuable framework for analyzing the causes and
consequences of revolutionary movements.

The French Revolution was driven by a combination of factors, including economic hardship, political corruption,
and social inequality. The French people were deeply dissatisfied with the monarchy, which was seen as out of
touch with the needs of the people. Widespread poverty, lack of political representation, and rising food prices
created an environment ripe for rebellion. Similarly, the revolution in your country likely shares some of these
8
 Sazzad
underlying causes—economic inequality, political corruption, or a government that failed to meet the needs of
the majority of its citizens.

Historically, revolutions like the French Revolution often occur when people feel that the social contract—the
implicit agreement between the government and its citizens—is broken. In France, the monarchy and the
aristocracy held most of the power and wealth, while the majority of the population, especially the peasants and
working class, were left in poverty. The revolution was sparked by this imbalance, leading to the overthrow of the
monarchy and the establishment of a new political order based on ideas of liberty, equality, and fraternity.

Similarly, the revolution in your country may be seen as a reaction to a broken social contract. If the government
was failing to provide basic services, maintain fairness, or respect the rights of its citizens, it’s likely that people
began to feel that their leaders were no longer legitimate. This sense of injustice often serves as the fuel for
revolutionary movements, as people demand a new system that better reflects their needs and desires.

The interim government in your country may parallel the transitional phases that occurred after the French
Revolution. After the monarchy was overthrown, France went through several phases of government, including
the Reign of Terror and the rise of Napoleon. These transitions were marked by uncertainty, as various groups vied
for power and struggled to establish a new order. In the same way, your country’s interim government is likely
facing challenges in trying to maintain stability while addressing the demands of the revolutionaries.

A key lesson from the French Revolution is that revolutions are often followed by periods of instability as new
political structures are put into place. In France, it took many years—and several changes of government—before
a stable republic was established. Your country may be experiencing a similar transitional phase, where the old
system has been dismantled, but the new one has not yet fully taken shape. This period can be marked by both
hope and uncertainty, as people work to build a new system that better reflects their ideals.

In conclusion, the historical context of revolutions like the French Revolution provides valuable insights into the
dynamics of your country’s recent revolution. Like the French, the people of your country are likely seeking greater
equality, justice, and representation, and the interim government is a step toward establishing a new political
order. However, as history shows, the path to a stable and lasting system may be long and complex.

To understand the recent revolution in your country, it helps to compare it with past revolutions, like the French
Revolution of 1789. The French Revolution is one of the most famous revolutions and gives us a good way to look
at why and how revolutions happen.

The French Revolution was caused by several factors: economic hardship, political corruption, and social
inequality. People were unhappy with the monarchy, which was not meeting their needs. Many people were poor,
had no political power, and faced high food prices. Similarly, your country’s revolution likely happened because
of problems like economic inequality, political corruption, or a government that did not take care of its people.

Revolutions often start when people feel the social contract—the agreement between the government and its
citizens—is broken. In France, the monarchy and the aristocracy held most of the power and wealth, leaving most
people in poverty. This imbalance led to the revolution, which aimed to create a new system based on liberty,
equality, and fraternity.

9
 Sazzad
The revolution in your country might also be a response to a broken social contract. If the government was not
providing basic services, fairness, or respecting people's rights, citizens might feel that their leaders are no longer
legitimate. This feeling of injustice can drive people to demand a new system that better serves their needs.

After the French Revolution, France went through several unstable phases, including the Reign of Terror and the
rise of Napoleon. Different groups fought for power and tried to establish a new order. Similarly, your country’s
interim government is likely facing challenges in maintaining stability while addressing the revolutionaries’
demands.

A key lesson from the French Revolution is that revolutions often lead to periods of instability as new political
structures are put in place. In France, it took many years and several changes in government before a stable
republic was established. Your country may be going through a similar phase, where the old system has been
removed but the new one is not fully formed yet. This period can be filled with both hope and uncertainty as people
work to build a new system that reflects their ideals.

In summary, looking at the French Revolution helps us understand your country’s recent revolution. People in both
cases are likely seeking greater equality, justice, and representation. The interim government is a step toward a
new political order, but history shows that achieving a stable and lasting system can take time and be complex.

Question 1: How does the scope and subject matter of sociology help in
understanding the recent revolution and interim government in my country?
Answer:

Sociology deals with a wide range of subjects, from small-scale individual interactions to large-scale social
processes. By studying both micro and macro interactions, sociology helps us understand everything from casual
interactions between individuals to the massive structural changes that societies undergo, such as revolutions.
In your country’s case, sociology can shed light on both the personal experiences of individuals (like a street boy
scavenging for food) and broader societal changes, like the revolution and establishment of an interim
government.

The recent revolution in your country likely emerged from the daily struggles and frustrations of individuals and
groups that became magnified over time. Sociologists would examine not only the events that triggered the
revolution but also the underlying conditions of social inequality, poverty, and political oppression that pushed
people to the breaking point. For instance, street children scavenging for food or marginalized groups participating
in protests are indicators of broader systemic problems that sociology seeks to understand.

The rise of fundamentalism or the emergence of political movements during the revolution would also fall under
sociology’s scope, as it analyzes the factors leading to collective action. Whether through the offering of food or
the practice of prostitution, sociology examines how social norms and practices develop and persist, even in
times of political upheaval.

Sociology also seeks to understand the temporary nature of the interim government. The study of social
processes, political transitions, and how power is transferred from one group to another are central to its scope.
10
 Sazzad
For instance, the formation of an interim government could be seen as a response to a breakdown in social order,
where a temporary structure is created to fill the vacuum left by the revolution. This process is central to
understanding how societies transition from chaos to order, how they restructure their institutions, and how these
changes affect both individuals and social groups.

Sociology studies a variety of topics, from small personal interactions to big social changes. By looking at both
micro (individual) and macro (societal) levels, sociology helps us understand everything from casual
conversations between people to significant events like revolutions. In your country, sociology can explain both
the personal experiences of individuals—like a street child searching for food—and larger societal changes, such
as the revolution and the creation of a temporary government.

The recent revolution likely came from the everyday struggles and frustrations of people that built up over time.
Sociologists would look at not just what sparked the revolution, but also the deeper issues like social inequality,
poverty, and political oppression that pushed people to take action. For example, street children looking for food
or marginalized groups joining protests show larger problems in society that sociology aims to understand.

Sociology also studies the rise of fundamentalism or political movements during the revolution, exploring what
factors lead people to act together. It examines how social norms and practices—like the need for food or even
prostitution—develop and persist, especially in times of political change.

Furthermore, sociology seeks to understand the temporary nature of an interim government. It looks at how power
changes hands and how societies adjust after upheaval. The formation of an interim government can be seen as
a response to a breakdown in social order, filling the gap left by the revolution. This process is key to understanding
how societies move from chaos to stability, how they reorganize their institutions, and how these changes impact
individuals and social groups.

Question 2: How does the development of sociological thinking help explain the
causes and outcomes of the revolution and interim government?
Answer:

The development of sociological thinking offers a framework for understanding the deep-rooted causes behind
revolutions, as well as the challenges that interim governments face. Early sociologists like Auguste Comte, Emile
Durkheim, Karl Marx, and Max Weber each provided key insights that can be applied to your country’s situation.

1. Auguste Comte and Positivism:

Comte, often regarded as the father of sociology, believed that society followed scientific laws, much like the
physical world. He argued that society passes through three stages: theological, metaphysical, and positive
(scientific) stages. The revolution in your country could be viewed through Comte’s "Law of Three Stages." In this
framework, the old regime might represent the theological or metaphysical stage, where traditional or religious
authority dominated social and political life. The revolution, in this context, could mark the transition to the

11
 Sazzad
"positive" stage, where people demand rational, scientific governance based on empirical evidence, equality, and
justice.

Comte’s positivist approach also emphasizes the importance of observable facts and evidence in understanding
social change. Sociology, through a positivist lens, would study the causes of the revolution empirically—such as
economic inequality, lack of political representation, and societal discontent—and analyze how these factors
converged to create the conditions for revolution.

2. Emile Durkheim and Social Solidarity:

Durkheim’s theory of social solidarity helps explain why revolutions occur and what challenges an interim
government might face. He distinguished between mechanical solidarity (found in traditional, less complex
societies) and organic solidarity (which arises in modern, industrialized societies with a high division of labor). In
your country, the rapid social changes, the breakdown of traditional values, and the industrialization process
might have created what Durkheim called anomie—a state of normlessness or social instability. Anomie occurs
when the old norms and values that once held society together are disrupted by rapid change, leading to feelings
of alienation and despair.

Durkheim believed that revolutions occur when social solidarity breaks down. In your country, the revolution
could be seen as a reaction to a lack of solidarity, where different social groups no longer felt connected to the
existing political and economic system. The interim government may face the challenge of rebuilding this lost
solidarity by establishing new norms and institutions that reflect the needs of a diverse population. If the interim
government fails to address the feelings of anomie, the social instability may persist, leading to further unrest.

3. Karl Marx and Class Conflict:

Marx’s theory of class conflict provides another perspective on your country’s revolution. Marx argued that history
is driven by the struggle between different social classes, particularly between the bourgeoisie (owners of capital)
and the proletariat (working class). He viewed capitalism as a system that perpetuates inequality, where the ruling
class exploits the working class for profit. In your country, the revolution could be seen as a direct result of this
class struggle, where the masses, frustrated by economic inequality and political oppression, rose up against the
ruling elite.

Marx’s ideas are particularly relevant if the revolution was fueled by economic grievances, such as poverty,
unemployment, or the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a few elites. According to Marx, the
interim government represents a transitional phase in the struggle between classes. While it might temporarily
address some of the demands of the working class, Marx would argue that real change can only come through a
complete overthrow of the capitalist system. Without this, the interim government might simply be a temporary
solution that preserves the status quo, eventually leading to more conflict between the ruling class and the
oppressed.

4. Max Weber and Social Action:

Max Weber’s theory of social action adds another layer to understanding the revolution and interim government.
Weber was concerned with the development of modern capitalism and the role of ideas, values, and beliefs in
shaping society. In Weber’s view, economic factors are important, but they are not the only drivers of social

12
 Sazzad
change. He believed that human motivation, ideas, and values—such as freedom, justice, or national identity—
also play a crucial role.

Weber’s concept of rationalization is particularly relevant to the idea of an interim government. The establishment
of such a government can be seen as an attempt to bring rational order to a chaotic situation, replacing the old,
irrational structures of power with more efficient and bureaucratic forms of governance. However, Weber also
warned that bureaucracies, while efficient, can become detached from the people and create a new form of
domination. The interim government, while offering a rational solution to the immediate crisis, might also face
challenges in maintaining legitimacy if it becomes too bureaucratic or fails to reflect the will of the people.

Weber’s ideas about the Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism can also be applied. In the context of your
country, certain ideologies or values might have played a key role in motivating the revolution. For example, if the
revolution was driven by a desire for democracy, human rights, or economic reforms, Weber would suggest that
these ideas and values were just as important as the economic conditions in shaping the course of the revolution
and the formation of the interim government.

The development of sociological thinking helps us understand why revolutions happen and the challenges that
interim governments face. Early sociologists like Auguste Comte, Emile Durkheim, Karl Marx, and Max Weber
provided important ideas that can apply to your country's situation.

1. Auguste Comte and Positivism

Comte, regarded as the father of sociology, believed that society functions under scientific laws similar to
those in nature. He proposed that societies evolve through three stages: theological (rooted in religious
beliefs), metaphysical (driven by abstract reasoning), and positive (anchored in scientific understanding).
In this context, the revolution in your country can be seen as a transition from an oppressive fascist
regime—characterized by human rights violations, suppression of dissent, and an obsession with silencing
opposition—toward a new, positive stage focused on rational governance, equality, and justice. Comte
emphasized the importance of observable facts in understanding social change, suggesting that factors
like economic inequality and widespread political discontent are central to the causes of this revolution.
2. Emile Durkheim and Social Solidarity
Durkheim studied social solidarity, which helps explain why revolutions happen and the challenges that
temporary governments face. He identified two types of solidarity: mechanical (found in simpler societies)
and organic (in more complex, industrialized societies). In your country, fast social changes may have
caused anomie, a state of confusion where old values break down. This loss of connection among people
could have led to the revolution, as many felt disconnected from the political and economic systems. The
interim government will need to rebuild this sense of community by creating new rules and institutions that
meet the different needs of the people. If they don’t succeed, social instability may continue, causing more
unrest.
3. Karl Marx and Class Conflict
Marx focused on class conflict as a key driver of history, especially between the wealthy (bourgeoisie) and
the working class (proletariat). He saw capitalism as a system that creates inequality, where the rich exploit
the poor. In your country, the revolution may have come from economic hardships and political

13
 Sazzad
oppression, with the masses rising up against the elites. According to Marx, the interim government is just
a temporary step in the ongoing class struggle. While it might solve some problems for the working class,
real change can only happen if the capitalist system is completely changed. If not, the interim government
might keep the same power structures in place, leading to more conflict.
4. Max Weber and Social Action
Weber looked at how ideas, values, and beliefs shape society, along with economic factors. He believed
that human desires—like the need for freedom and justice—are important for social change. Weber's idea
of rationalization relates to the interim government’s effort to bring order to a chaotic situation by
replacing old, inefficient systems with more organized ones. However, he warned that bureaucracies could
become disconnected from the people and create new forms of control. If the interim government
becomes too bureaucratic or fails to represent the people's wishes, it may struggle to stay legitimate.
Weber emphasized that values, such as the desire for democracy or economic reform, play a significant
role in shaping the revolution and the interim government's actions. Overall, these sociological
perspectives help explain the complex factors that contribute to revolutions and the challenges interim
governments face in rebuilding society.

Question 3: How can Comte's "Law of Three Stages" and Durkheim's concept of
anomie help explain the current political situation in my country?
Answer:

Comte’s Law of Three Stages and Durkheim’s concept of anomie can offer valuable insights into the recent
revolution and the challenges facing the interim government in your country.

1. Comte’s Law of Three Stages:

According to Comte, societies evolve through three stages: the theological stage, the metaphysical stage, and the
positive stage. The revolution in your country could signify a transition from the metaphysical stage, where
traditional or ideological beliefs dominated governance, to the positive (scientific) stage, where rational and
evidence-based governance is sought.

Before the revolution, the government may have been relying on traditional or religious justifications for its rule,
which many people found outdated or oppressive. The revolution could be seen as a rejection of these traditional
ideas, with the population demanding more scientific, rational, and evidence-based policies that address real-
world issues like poverty, inequality, and corruption. The interim government, in this context, might represent an
attempt to move towards the positive stage, where decisions are made based on empirical data, scientific
principles, and democratic ideals.

2. Durkheim’s Concept of Anomie:

Durkheim’s concept of anomie is equally important in understanding the revolution. Anomie refers to a breakdown
of social norms and a sense of aimlessness or despair that arises when societies undergo rapid change. In the
case of your country, the revolution likely disrupted the existing social order, leading to a period of uncertainty and

14
 Sazzad
normlessness. People may feel disconnected from the traditional institutions that once provided a sense of
stability and meaning, leading to widespread feelings of alienation.

The interim government faces the challenge of restoring social solidarity in the aftermath of the revolution. It must
create new norms, laws, and institutions that can provide people with a sense of purpose and direction. If the
government fails to address the root causes of anomie—such as economic instability, political corruption, or
social inequality—it may struggle to restore order, and the sense of aimlessness could persist.

In summary, Comte’s Law of Three Stages and Durkheim’s concept of anomie provide a framework for
understanding the recent revolution as a transition toward a more

rational and scientific form of governance, while highlighting the challenges the interim government faces in
restoring social cohesion and addressing the feelings of uncertainty and normlessness created by the revolution.

Comte’s Law of Three Stages and Durkheim’s idea of anomie help us understand the recent revolution and the
problems the interim government is facing in your country.

1. Comte’s Law of Three Stages:

Comte believed that societies grow through three stages: the theological stage (based on religion), the
metaphysical stage (based on ideas), and the positive stage (based on science and facts). The revolution
in your country might show a shift from the metaphysical stage, where traditional beliefs were used to
justify government actions, to the positive stage, where people want decisions based on facts and science.
Before the revolution, the government may have used old religious or traditional reasons to rule, which
many people found outdated and unfair. The revolution can be seen as a rejection of these old ideas, with
citizens calling for policies that deal with real problems like poverty, inequality, and corruption. The interim
government could be trying to move toward this positive stage, where decisions are based on evidence and
democratic values.
2. Durkheim’s Concept of Anomie:
Durkheim’s idea of anomie is also important for understanding the revolution. Anomie happens when
social norms break down, causing people to feel lost or hopeless, especially during rapid changes. In your
country, the revolution likely disrupted the existing social order, leading to confusion and uncertainty.
People might feel disconnected from the institutions that once gave them stability and meaning, resulting
in feelings of isolation.
The interim government has the challenge of rebuilding social connections after the revolution. It needs to
create new rules and institutions that give people a sense of purpose and direction. If the government
doesn’t address the causes of anomie—like economic instability, political corruption, or social
inequality—it may have a hard time restoring order, and feelings of aimlessness could continue.
In summary, Comte’s Law of Three Stages and Durkheim’s concept of anomie help explain the recent
revolution as a move toward a more rational and scientific form of government. They also highlight the
challenges the interim government faces in bringing people together and dealing with the uncertainty
created by the revolution.

15
 Sazzad
Question: What are the major social, political, and economic factors that contributed to the
recent revolution in your country?
Answer: Sociological studies show that revolutions happen when people have long-standing problems like inequality,
corruption, and unfair treatment. These issues might get worse due to a lack of political freedom, poor economic
conditions, or unfair leadership. For example, if many people are unemployed or can't access education and resources,
they may become unhappy with the government. This frustration can lead to social unrest and eventually spark a
revolution.

Question: How would common sense versus a scientific approach explain the reasons for
the revolution in your country?
Answer: Common sense might say that the revolution happened because people were angry at the government or wanted
change. It would focus on simple reasons like "the government was corrupt" or "people just had enough."
A scientific approach, however, would study the deeper reasons. It would look at things like economic problems, unfair
treatment, or historical events that led to the revolution. For example, it could use theories like Marxism, which explains
that struggles between different social classes often cause revolutions. The scientific method tries to understand the full
picture by looking at many factors and using research.

Question: How can sociological theory be used to explain the occurrence of revolutions?
Answer: Sociological theories help explain why revolutions happen. For example, conflict theory says that revolutions
occur because different social classes or groups fight for power and resources. Dependency theory might say that outside
forces, like foreign countries or economies, made the government weak, leading to the revolution. These theories help us
understand the complex ways society works and how people’s actions lead to big changes like revolutions.

Question: What types of social research could be conducted to understand the social
changes following the revolution?
Answer: Different kinds of social research can help understand the changes after a revolution. Exploratory research can
look at how social, political, and economic systems have been affected. Explanatory research tries to find out what caused
certain changes, like the growth of new political movements or shifts in public opinion.

Qualitative research, such as interviews and observing people’s experiences, gives detailed insights into how individuals
and communities are dealing with the changes. Quantitative research can use numbers to study things like income
inequality, unemployment, or voter turnout after the revolution.

Question: How do causation and correlation help in understanding the factors that led to
the revolution in your country?
Answer: Causation and correlation are important for understanding what led to the revolution. Causation means that one
thing directly causes another. For example, if the government cracks down on people, it could lead to protests, which
might cause a revolution.
16
 Sazzad
Correlation, on the other hand, means that two things are related but one doesn’t necessarily cause the other. For instance,
if unemployment rises and people get more unhappy with the government, that’s a correlation. But it doesn’t mean that
unemployment alone caused the revolution.

Question: What research methods could be used to assess the effectiveness of the interim
government in stabilizing society?
Answer: To assess how well the interim government is stabilizing society, researchers can use both qualitative
and quantitative methods.

Quantitative research might look at things like changes in economic indicators, crime rates, and public opinion polls
over time to see if society is becoming more stable.

Qualitative methods could include interviews and focus groups to understand how different social groups feel about the
interim government's performance.
Comparative case studies can also be helpful by comparing the current interim government to those in other countries
that went through similar political changes.

Question: In the context of your country’s revolution, how do researchers differentiate

between factors that are correlated and those that are causal?
Answer: Researchers differentiate between factors that are correlated and those that are causal by using careful data
analysis and theories. For example, they might see that high income inequality and political corruption happen at the
same time as revolutions, but they need to do more research to find out if these factors actually caused the revolution.

To do this, they can look at historical trends, conduct interviews, and study changes in policies. This helps them
understand the cause-and-effect relationship, like how worsening economic conditions could lead to protests that
eventually result in a revolution.

Question: What are the main phases of social research in studying the recent revolution in
your country?
Answer: The main phases of social research in studying the recent revolution in your country include:

1. Exploratory Phase: This is where researchers gather basic information about the causes of the revolution. They
might read existing studies, do initial interviews, and collect historical data.

2. Hypothesis Formulation Phase: In this phase, researchers identify specific factors, like economic inequality or
political repression, that might have led to the revolution.

3. Data Collection Phase: Researchers gather information through surveys, interviews, and statistical analysis to
get relevant data.
4. Analysis Phase: Here, the researchers analyze the data to see if there are clear cause-and-effect relationships
between the identified factors and the revolution.
These steps help researchers systematically study the causes, effects, and implications of the revolution using social
research methods.
17
 Sazzad
Question: Why is defining the research problem considered the first and most crucial step
in social research?
Answer: Defining the research problem is the first and most important step in social research because it sets the direction
for the entire study. A clear problem helps the researcher focus on the right goals and gather useful information. For
example, if the research is about how education affects income, clearly stating the problem will guide the study and make
it easier to find the right data. In short, a well-defined problem makes the research process smoother and more effective.

Question: What role do operational definitions play in the process of collecting data for
social research?
Answer: Operational definitions are important in social research because they explain exactly what the variables mean.
This makes sure that everyone collecting data does it in the same way. Without clear definitions, people might understand
things differently, and the results could be wrong. For example, if a study looks at the link between income and car
ownership, it's important to clearly define what "income" and "ownership" mean to collect correct data.

Question: What is the importance of reviewing existing literature before conducting new
research?
Answer: Reviewing existing literature is important because it helps the researcher learn what is already known about a
topic. It shows the theories, methods, and gaps in past studies. This helps in creating better research questions and avoids
repeating what others have done. For example, if you're studying how religion affects the economy, looking at previous
research can show you different ways religion impacts economic behavior, helping you focus your study better.

Question: Why is formulating a testable hypothesis important in social research?

Answer: Formulating a testable hypothesis is important because it gives a clear idea of what the research aims to find. A
hypothesis is a guess that predicts how two or more things are related. It helps the researcher focus on what to test. For
example, if the research is about education and income, the hypothesis could be, "People with more education earn higher
incomes." This helps the researcher design a study to check if this idea is true.

Question: Why is a well-planned research design critical in the success of social research?
Answer: A well-planned research design is important because it acts as a guide for how the study will be done. It explains
the methods for collecting and analyzing data, making sure the research is done in an organized way. This helps ensure
the results are accurate and trustworthy. For example, if you're studying the link between age and marriage, the research
design would decide how to collect data (like using surveys or interviews), how many people to include, and how to
measure things like age and marital status.

18
 Sazzad
Question: What role does sampling play in determining the validity and generalizability of
research findings?
Answer: Sampling is important because it involves choosing a small group of people or items from a larger population
to study. The way this group is chosen affects how accurate and useful the results are. Random sampling, where everyone
has an equal chance of being picked, helps researchers apply the findings to the whole population. For example, if a study
on behavior changes at NSU randomly selects 500 students from 15,000, the results can represent the entire student body
more accurately.

Question: How do primary and secondary data differ, and how are they used in social
research?
Answer: Primary data is information that the researcher collects directly, like through surveys, interviews, or
experiments. Secondary data is information that comes from existing sources, like books, articles, or previous studies. In
a study about income and car ownership, primary data could be new surveys the researcher does, while secondary data
could be from past national surveys about income.

Question: What are the key steps in analyzing data, and why is it essential before formulating conclusions?

Answer: Analyzing data means organizing and understanding the information collected to answer the research question.
This is important because it helps find patterns, test the hypothesis, and check if the results are correct. For example, it
shows if there is a real link between things like education and income or age and marriage. Without proper data analysis,
conclusions might be wrong or misleading.

Question: After analyzing the data, how do researchers formulate conclusions, and why is
it important to suggest further research?
Answer: After analyzing the data, researchers make conclusions based on their findings. These conclusions show if the
results support or reject the original idea (hypothesis). It's important to suggest further research because every study has
limits, and new questions might come up. For example, after studying the link between religion and the economy, a
researcher might suggest more studies on how religious beliefs affect economic policies in different areas.

19
 Sazzad
Question: What are the fundamental elements of social research, and how do they differ
from common sense and scientific inquiry?
Answer:

Social research is a scientific way to study and understand how society works. Unlike common sense, which is based on
everyday ideas and beliefs, social research uses careful observation, theories, and evidence to answer questions about
social issues. Here's how it works:

1. Sociological Questions: These questions explore how society functions, such as the link between education and
income, or why certain social patterns exist.

2. Common Sense vs. Science:

o Common sense: Practical knowledge that people accept without testing, which can be simple or
sometimes wrong.
o Science: A careful, systematic way of studying things, using evidence, observation, and testing to
understand how things work.

3. Basic Elements of Science:

o Observation and Description: Watching and recording what happens.

o Discovering General Rules: Finding patterns or rules that explain what you observed.
o Construction of Theory: Building ideas (theories) to explain and predict things based on those patterns.

4. Theory: A theory in social research explains how and why things happen in society. For example, Amartya Sen's
theory explains how a lack of access to resources can cause famine.

5. Social Research: This is a planned investigation to understand social issues using theories and evidence. It
answers important questions about society, like how social structures and relationships work.
6. Types of Social Research:

o Basic Research: Expands knowledge for its own sake.

o Applied Research: Finds solutions to social problems.

o Exploratory Research: Seeks new insights into a topic.

o Explanatory Research: Explores why things happen, focusing on causes.

o Experimental Research: Tests specific ideas by changing things to see the effects.

7. Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research:

o Quantitative Research: Uses numbers and data to find patterns.

o Qualitative Research: Focuses on understanding experiences and social situations in detail.

Unlike common sense, social research follows the scientific method, ensuring that the findings are objective and reliable.
It involves planning, collecting data, analyzing it, and forming conclusions to give a deeper, evidence-based
understanding of society.

20
 Sazzad
Question: What are the key phases of the research process, and how do they contribute to
successful research outcomes?
Answer:

The research process has several important steps that help a researcher go from identifying a problem to reaching
conclusions and making recommendations. Here’s a simple breakdown:

1. Defining the Problem: This is the first and most important step. Clearly stating the problem helps keep the
research focused and relevant. A well-defined problem makes sure the goals are clear and the right data is
collected.

2. Reviewing the Literature: This means looking at existing research to see what is already known. It helps the
researcher find gaps in knowledge and avoid repeating past studies. This step also helps refine the problem and
find useful methods or theories.

3. Formulating a Hypothesis: A hypothesis is a guess about how things might be related. It gives direction to the
research and allows the researcher to test ideas and understand cause-and-effect relationships.

4. Planning a Research Design: This step involves creating a detailed plan for collecting and analyzing data. A
good research design makes sure the research is valid (it measures what it’s supposed to) and reliable (it produces
consistent results).
5. Sampling: Researchers choose a small group from a larger population to make the research easier to manage.
There are two main ways to sample: probability sampling (random selection) and non-probability sampling (not
random). The sample should represent the larger group to ensure accurate results.

6. Analyzing the Data: After collecting the data, it is analyzed to see if the hypothesis is supported. This step
involves organizing and interpreting the data to find patterns and relationships.

7. Formulating the Conclusion: Based on the data analysis, researchers draw conclusions that answer the original
research question. These findings can either support or challenge the hypothesis and help solve the problem
identified.

8. Ideas for Further Research: After finishing the research, the researcher identifies new questions or areas that
need more exploration. This step helps the field advance and encourages ongoing inquiry.

Each of these steps is crucial for doing thorough and credible research. Skipping any step could lead to research that lacks
focus or accuracy, resulting in wrong conclusions.

21