Aspen HYSYS Compressor Surge Analysis Feature Tutorial
Aspen HYSYS Compressor Surge Analysis Feature Tutorial
Aspen HYSYS and the aspen leaf are trademarks or registered trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc., Burlington,
MA.
All other brand and product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies.
This document is intended as a guide to using AspenTech's software. This documentation contains AspenTech
proprietary and confidential information and may not be disclosed, used, or copied without the prior consent of
AspenTech or as set forth in the applicable license agreement. Users are solely responsible for the proper use of
the software and the application of the results obtained.
Although AspenTech has tested the software and reviewed the documentation, the sole warranty for the software
may be found in the applicable license agreement between AspenTech and the user. ASPENTECH MAKES NO
WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO THIS DOCUMENTATION, ITS
QUALITY, PERFORMANCE, MERCHANTABILITY, OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Note: For this case, you will discard the Cooler on Discharge side
template since the dew point temperature of the stream on the outlet side of
the Cooler is significantly lower than 43°C. This means that condensation
cannot take place, so there is no need of a downstream scrubber.
Notes:
The scrubbers will be sized from the following two equations. These equations determine the
These formulas are only valid for the units given below and that their conversion to the Englis
D 2.12Q 0.5g
H 1.5 D
where
g : mass density of the vessel vapor outlet stream (kg/m3)
Q : mass density of the vessel vapor outlet stream (m3/s)
D : minimum vessel diameter (m)
H : vessel height (m)
The flowsheet is in steady state. Make sure that it is converged before proceeding with the rest of this example.
Note:
To run For Emergency
the this scenario, only the surge compressor
Shutdown scenario:and anti-surge
valve settings are used to avoid this situation.
1 The Emergency Shutdown scenario relies mostly on the Cv value of the
anti-surge valve. The surge controller plays no role, since the anti-surge
valve will fully open manually as the compressor power is shut down. The
Event Scheduler is also set to open the hot-bypass valve. In a first pass,
you want to avoid the interaction of both valves, so select the Dynamics
ribbon tab, select Summary, and then select the Equipment Sizing tab.
Set the conductance of the hot-bypass valve to zero, as shown below in
Figure 4.
2 On the Dynamics ribbon tab, from the Select Scenario drop-down list,
select Emergency Shutdown.
3 On the Dynamics ribbon tab, click the Run button.
Figure 7. Operating point trail for the Cv=720 USGPM at the anti-surge valve
Figure 7 now shows the impact of this larger Cv on the Discharge Valve
Failure scenario. Notice that the minimum compressor flow is now slightly
higher than the one in Figure 3. In conclusion, a larger Cv will avoid surge,
but you can only increase it to some maximum value before stonewall takes
place. This test case does not require the hot bypass valve to handle these
two scenarios.
Figure 9. Successful total power loss when using the previously found
overall settings
As you can see with Figure 10 (below), the loss of coolant does not represent
a serious inconvenience. The compressor suction stream temperature slightly
exceeds 70oC. For the still rotating shutdown compressor, the discharge
temperature is almost the same as the suction temperature.
There are two sets of degrees of freedom to modify and a single criterion to
pass four scenarios.
The degrees of freedom are for:
• the surge controller and anti-surge valve side
• the hot-bypass valve size and overall discharge volume size
All scenarios have been set to convenient default values, so only minor
changes are involved. The single criterion for success or failure is based on
the trail of the compressor operating point in the compressor map that is
generated during each particular test scenario.
Figure 14. Controlled shutdown test (left side) and total power loss (right
side). Both recycle valves are used at their default Cv values and
simulate surge and stone wall conditions.
Figure 15. Evolution of the compressor suction side temperature during the
total power loss scenario
For K-100, the Cooler on discharge side, no downstream scrubber
template seems to be a more reasonable one, since it only requires the anti-
surge recycle valve with moderate Cv and the operating point trails found
were acceptably close to either the surge or the stonewall limits. This
completes your study of the first compressor case.
Figure 20. Default valve sizing and conditions for “Cooler on suction
side” template, compressor K-101
Figure 21. Discharge valve failure test for compressor K-101 in template
“Cooler on suction side”
References
[1] Douglas, James M. “Conceptual Design of Chemical Processes.” McGraw-
Hill, Inc., 1988.
[2] Luyben, William L. “Plantwide Dynamic Simulation in Chemical Process
and Control.” Marcel Dekker, 2002, Chapter 2.