Pgmath2015 Solutions
Pgmath2015 Solutions
Part A
(1). B, D.
(2). B.
(3). A, B, C, D.
(4). A, C.
(5). C, D.
(6). A, C.
(7). B, C.
(8). 2.
(9). 0.
(10). 0.
Part B
(11). After changing coordinates, we may assume that f vanishes in an open neighbourhood
of the origin. Hence
∂n
f (0, 0) = 0
∂xi ∂y n−i
for every n ≥ 0 and 0 ≤ i ≤ n. Therefore all the coefficients of f are zero, so f = 0.
(12). (a). Let v 6= 0 ∈ ker A, so (In + A)v = v; hence 1 is an eigenvalue of (In + A).
Conversely, suppose that (In + A)v = λv for some nonzero v. If Av = 0, then v = λv, so λ = 1.
Otherwise, multiplying on the left by A, we see that Av = λ(Av); hence, again, λ = 1.
(b). A2 + 1 = 0, so the minimal polynomial of A divides t2 + 1 which has distinct roots.
Hence the minimal polynomial of A has distinct roots, so A is diagonalizable.
(13). For r ∈ R, r > 0, let Cr := {z ∈ C : |z| = r}, Ur := {z ∈ C : |z| < r} and
r = min{|f (z)| : z ∈ Cr }. As f it nonconstant, the origin is an isolated zero of f . Choose r > 0
such that the origin is the only zero in Cr ∪ Ur . As the set {z : |f (z)| < r } intersects Ur but
not Cr , it must be in Ur , by the second condition on f . Hence the origin is the only zero of f .
Now letting r −→ ∞, we see that for all z 6∈ Ur , |f (z)| ≥ r . Hence f has a pole at infinity, i.e.,
there exists a non-negative integer m (z −1 ) is analytic at z = 0. Suppose that f
P∞ mi such thatmz f−1
is a power-series expression i=n ai z . Since z f (z ) is analytic at z = 0, we see that ai = 0
for all i ≥ m. Hence f is a polynomial that vanishes exactly at z = 0. Thus f = cz n for some
positive interger n and non-zero c ∈ C.
(14). For each positive integer k, using a), choose Nk such that
|bk − am,k | < ∀m ≥ Nk .
2
Let mk = N1 + · · · + Nk . Then mk is increasing. Now, using b), choose a positive integer K,
such that
|amk ,k − 1| < ∀k ≥ K.
2
By triangle inequality
|bk − 1| < ∀k ≥ K.
(15). May assume that f is homogeneous of degree d. Induct on d. If xd appears in f ,
then so does y d (with the same coefficient. Hence we may write f = α(xd + y d ) + xyf1 (x, y),
where α could be zero. Note that f1 (x, y) = f1 (y, x), so by induction, there exists g1 such
that f1 (x, y) = g1 (x + y, xy). Write xd + y d = (x + y)d − xyf2 (x, y); f2 (x, y) = f2 (y, x), so by
induction, there exists g2 such that f2 (x, y) = g2 (x + y, xy).
(16). Note that for every a ∈ [0, 1] and for every open subset U of X containing f −1 (a),
there is an open neighbourhood W (for example, take W = [0, 1] \ f (X \ U )) of a such that
f −1 (W ) ⊆ U . Now let Ui , i ∈ I be an open
S covering of X. For every a ∈ [0, 1], there exists a
finite subset Ia of I such that f −1 (a) ⊆ i∈Ia Ui . Let Wa be an open neighbourhood of a such
1
that f −1 (Wa ) ⊆ i∈Ia Ui . There exist finitely many a1 , . . . , an such that [0, 1] = nj=1 Waj .
S S
Then X = nj=1 f −1 (Waj ) = nj=1 i∈Ia Ui . This is a finite subcovering of the given open
S S S
j
covering.
(17∗ ). For each such P , let RP be the smallest subring of Q that contains { p1 |p ∈ P }. If
P 6= Q, then RP 6= RQ . The set of all the primes is countably infinite, and the power-set of a
countably infinite set is uncountable. Hence Q has uncountably many subrings.
(18∗ ). Let |x| ≤ M . Since sin x ≤ x,
X sin x X 1
n
f (x) = ≤M < ∞,
n n2
n≥1 n≥1
and hence f is well-defined.
P sin x
Also the same argument shows, if we set fN = N ≥n≥1 n n , then fN converges uniformly
to f as N 7→ ∞ in the interval (−M, M ), and hence f is continuous. Since M is arbitrary f is
continuous everywhere.
x
cos n
Since cos nx ≤ 1, g is well-defined, and
P
Again let |x| ≤ M and we set g = n≥1 n2
x
0 =
P cos n
fN N ≥n≥1 n2 uniformly converges to g, by the same arguments. Since fN converges
uniformly to f and since fN 0 converges uniformly to g in the interval (−M, M ), f 0 = g. Since