Week 6
Week 6
LESSON 15
PROJECT PLANNING
Broad Contents
Introduction
Project Planning
Plan of Execution
Information Required for Planning Execution of Projects
Early Stage Documentation by Project Manager
15.1 Introduction:
Planning is done to facilitate later accomplishment. Planning techniques covered here are
intended to smooth the path from idea to accomplishment. Project planning is a complicated
process to manage project and planning act as map of this process. Map must have sufficient
detail to determine what must be done next but simple enough that workers are not lost in welter
of minutiae.
Almost all project planning techniques lead to plans that contain same basic elements. They
differ only in ways they approach process of planning. At its best, planning is tortuous. It is
iterative process yielding better plans from not-so-good plans, and iterative process of
improvement seems to take place in fits and starts. Process may be described formally, but it
does not occur formally. Bits and pieces of plans are developed by individuals, by formal group
meetings, or by formalized planning teams and then improved by other individuals, groups, or
teams, and improved again, and again.
A systematic plan is required in which the entire company is considered as one large network
that is further subdivided into smaller ones. This would ensure effective utilization over several
different types of projects.
In this regard, the first step in total program scheduling is to understand the project objectives.
These goals may be to:
• Develop expertise in a given area
• To become competitive
• To modify an existing facility for later use
• To keep key personnel employed.
Both implicitly and explicitly, the objectives are generally not independent and are all
interrelated.
The following four questions must be considered, once the objectives are clearly defined:
Both the direct as well as the indirect-labor-charging organizational units must accomplish
careful planning and analysis, if the project is large and complex. The project organizational
structure must be designed to fit the project; work plans and schedules must be established so
that maximum allocation of resources can be made; resource costing and accounting systems
must be developed; and a management information and reporting system must be established.
Unless all of the necessary information becomes available at project initiation effective total
program planning cannot be accomplished. These information requirements are:
As the name indicates, the statement of work (SOW) is a narrative description of the work to be
accomplished. It includes the objectives of the project, a brief description of the work, the
funding constraint if one exists, and the specifications and schedule. The schedule is a "gross"
schedule and includes such things as the:
• Start date
• End date
• Major milestones
• Written reports (data items)
Report writing is a specialized area. Written reports should always be identified so that if
functional input is required, the functional manager will assign an individual who has writing
skills. It is no secret who would write the report if the line people did not.
As described earlier, project planning is a structured sequence of events that lead to a desired set
of objectives.
A detailed, written, “Plan of Execution (P of E) ” for project is drawn up, once project
viability has been established and decision to proceed has been made. This plan must show:
a) Who is to do what
b) When
c) How
d) Major decisions requirements
It is essential that the project objectives must be clearly tied to overall mission of the firm.
Senior management defines a firm’s:
Project management plans are more comprehensive than either management plans or project
plans. The preparation of plans is a simple, straightforward approach designed to promote and
ensure comprehensive project planning. The project management plan is a combination of two
plans that are often prepared separately: the traditional management plan, which describes
operational management systems and approaches, and the project plan, which includes the work
breakdown structure (WBS), logic, schedules, and cost estimates. They reflect awareness that
the people, the system, and the detailed planning are all critical to project success.
1. Type of project
2. Its capacity and location(s)
3. Scope of work to be performed
4. Preliminary cost estimation
5. Site visitation report
6. Preliminary schedule of major objectives
7. Pertinent contract requirements
8. Special design and/or construction requirements
9. Climate restrictions
10. Environmental study, feasibility study reports, etc
11. Proposal document
Following are the basis for Project Manager’s planning endeavors for planning of execution.
• Existing documents:
• Client’s inquiry
• Proposal (as modified/amended in negotiation period)
• Contract and preliminary wok plans (during proposal preparation)
It leads to develop Work Breakdown Structure and integrates work schedule costs into track-
able and controllable program. During this phase, performance baselines are also estimated
during project planning.
Broad Contents
In simple terms, planning is determining what needs to be done, by whom, and by when; in
order to fulfill one's assigned responsibility. There are nine major components of the planning
phase:
Some of these components require additional comment. Forecasting what will happen may not
be easy, especially if predictions of environmental reactions are required. For example, planning
is customarily defined as strategic, tactical, or operational. Strategic planning is generally for
five years or more, tactical can be for one to five years, and operational is the here and now of
six months to one year. Although most projects are operational, they can be considered as
strategic, especially if spin-offs or follow-up work is promising. Forecasting also requires an
understanding of strengths and weaknesses as found in:
• Competitive situation
• Marketing
• Research and development
• Production
• Financing
• Personnel
• Management structure
These factors may be clearly definable, if project planning is strictly operational. However, if
strategic or long-range planning is necessary, then the future economic outlook can vary, say,
from year to year, and re-planning must be accomplished at regular intervals because the goals
and objectives can change.
Because of their uniqueness, the last three factors, policies, procedures, and standards, can vary
from project to project. Each project manager can establish project policies, provided that they
fall within the broad limits set forth by top management. Policies are predetermined general
courses or guides based on the following principles:
© Copyright Virtual University of Pakistan 123
Project Management –MGMT627 VU
It is essential that the project policies must often conform closely to company policies, and are
usually similar in nature from project to project. On the other hand, procedures can be
drastically different from project to project, even if the same activity is performed. For example,
the signing off of manufacturing plans may require different signatures on two selected projects
even though the same end-item is being produced.
We can easily say that planning varies at each level of the organization. At the individual level,
planning is required so that cognitive simulation can be established before irrevocable actions are
taken. At the working group or functional level, planning must include the following:
• Agreement on purpose
• Assignment and acceptance of individual responsibilities
• Coordination of work activities
• Increased commitment to group goals
• Lateral communications
In order for the alternatives and constraints to be fully understood, the logic of planning requires
answers to several questions. An outline for a partial list of questions would include:
It is believed that one of the most difficult activities in the project environment is to keep the
planning on target.
Following are typical procedures that can assist project managers during planning activities:
• Establish goals before you plan. Otherwise short-term thinking takes over.
• Set goals for the planners. This will guard against the nonessentials and places your effort
where there is payoff.
• Stay flexible. Use people-to-people contact, and stress fast response.
• Keep a balanced outlook. Do not overreact, and position yourself for an upturn.
• Welcome top-management participation. Top management has the capability to make or
break a plan, and may well be the single most important variable.
• Beware of future spending plans. This may eliminate the tendency to underestimate.
• Test the assumptions behind the forecasts. This is necessary because professionals are
generally too optimistic. Do not depend solely on one set of data.
• Do not focus on today's problems. Try to get away from crisis management and fire
fighting.
• Reward those who dispel illusions. Reward the first to come forth with bad news.
It is crucial that project's objectives be clearly tied to overall mission of firm. Senior
management should define firm’s intent in undertaking project, outline scope of project, and
describe project's desired results. Without clear beginning, project planning can easily go astray.
It is also vital that senior manager call and be present at initial coordinating meeting as visible
symbol of top management’s commitment to project.
At the beginning, meeting is conducted in which, project is discussed in sufficient detail that
potential contributors develop general understanding of what is needed. If project is one of
many similar projects, meeting will be quite short and routine, sort of “touching base” with
other interested units. If project is unique in most of its aspects, extensive discussion may be
required.
After this, these plans are then reviewed by groups and combined into composite project plan.
Composite plan, that is still not completely final, is approved by each participating group, by
project manager, and then by senior organizational management. Each subsequent approval
hardens plan somewhat, and when senior management has endorsed it, any further changes
must be made by processing formal change order. However, if project is not large or complex,
informal written memoranda can substitute for change order. Main point is that no significant
changes in project are made, without written notice, following top management's approval.
Definition of “significant” depends on specific situation and people involved.
It is generally the responsibility of the project manager to task responsibility for gathering
necessary approvals and assuring that any changes incorporated into plan at higher levels are
© Copyright Virtual University of Pakistan 125
Project Management –MGMT627 VU
communicated to, and approved by, units that have already signed off on plan. Nothing is as
sure to enrage functional unit managers as to find that they have been committed by someone
else to alterations in their carefully considered plans with out being informed. Violation of this
procedure is considered betrayal of trust. Several incidents of this kind occurred in firm during
project to design line of children’s clothing. Anger at this change without communication was
so great that two chief designers resigned and took jobs wit competitors.
Project manager should always return to contributing units for consideration and re-approval of
plans as modified, because the senior manages are almost certain to exercise their prerogative to
change plan. Final, approved result of this procedure is project plan, also known as master plan,
or baseline plan.
Fundamental planning process is unchanged (except for the fact that specifications
cannot be altered without client's permission), when project is to deliver product/service
(often referred to as project's deliverables) to outside client(s). Common “planning”
problem in these cases is that marketing has promised deliverables that engineering may
not know how to produce on schedule that manufacturing may be unable to meet. This
sort of problem usually result when various functional areas are not involved in
planning process at time original proposal is made to potential client.
It is usually cheaper, faster and easier to do things right first time than to redo them.
Thus, rejoinder to such objections is simple. When product/service is complex system
that must be installed in larger, more complex system, it is appropriate to treat sale like
project. Sale is also a project and deserves same kind of planning. Great many firms
that consistently operate in atmosphere typed by design and manufacturing crises have
created their own panics. In fairness, it is appropriate to urge that anyone meeting
customers face to face should receive some training in tactics of selling.
For a given project plan, approvals really amount to series of authorizations. Project
manager is authorized to direct activities, spend monies (usually within preset limits)
request resources and personnel, and start project on its way. Senior management's
approval not only signals its willingness to fund and support project, but also notifies
subunits in organization that they may commit resources to project.
• Procurement Planning:
• Engineering Planning:
1. Source(s) of technology
2. Codes, specifications and standards to be utilized
3. Utilization of consultants
4. Early work
5. Requisitioning priorities
6. Drawing priorities
7. Vendor data requirements
8. Utilization of scale models
9. Manpower requirements
10. Approval requirements
11. Organization and staffing
12. Utilization of prefabricated modules
• Financial Planning:
Broad Contents
As we know that the process of developing project plan varies from organization to
organization. However, any project plan must contain the following elements:
• Overview:
This is short summary of objectives and scope of project. It is directed to top management
and contains statement of goals of project; brief explanation of their relationship to firm’s
objectives, description of managerial structure that will be used for project, and list of major
milestones in project schedule.
• Introduction:
This contains more detailed statement of general goals noted in overview section. Statement
should include profit and competitive aims as well as technical goals.
• General Approach:
This section describes both managerial and technical approaches to work. Technical
discussion describes relationship of project to available technologies. For example, it might
note this project is extension of work done by company for earlier project. Subsection on
managerial approach takes note of any deviation from routine procedure – for instance, use
of subcontractors for some parts of work.
• Contractual Aspects:
This critical section of plan includes complete list and description of all reporting
requirements, customer-supplied resources, liaison arrangements, advisory committees,
project review and cancellation procedures, proprietary requirements, any specific
management agreements (for example, use of subcontractors) as well as technical
deliverables and their specifications, delivery schedules, and specific procedures for
changing any of above. Completeness is necessity in this section. If in doubt about whether
item should be included or not, wise planner will include it.
• Schedules:
This section outlines various schedules and lists all milestones events. Estimated time for
each task should be obtained from those who will do work. Project master schedule is
constructed from those inputs. Responsible person or department head should sign off on
final, agreed-on schedule.
• Resources:
There are two primary aspects to this section. First is budget. Both capital and expense
requirements are detailed by task, which makes this project budget. One-time costs are
separated from recurring project costs. Second, cost monitoring and control procedures
should be described. In additional to usual routine elements, monitoring and control
procedures must be designed to cover special resource requirements for project, such as
• Personnel:
This section lists expected personnel requirements of project. Special skills, types of
training needed, possible recruiting problems, legal or policy restrictions on work force
composition, and any other special requirement, such as security clearances, should be
noted here. (This reference to “security” includes need to protect trade secrets and research
targets from competitors as well as need to protect national security). It is helpful to time-
phase personnel needs to project needed and in what numbers. These projections are
important element of budget, so personnel, schedule, and resources sections can be
crosschecked with one another to ensure consistency.
• Evaluation Methods:
Every project should be evaluated against standards and by methods established at project's
inception. This section contains brief description of procedure to follow in monitoring,
collecting, storing, and evaluating history of project.
• Potential Problems:
Sometimes it is difficult to convince planners to make serious attempt to anticipate potential
difficulties. One or more such possible disasters such as subcontractor default, technical
failure, strikes, bad weather, sudden required breakthroughs, critical sequences of tasks,
tight deadlines, resource limitations, complex coordination requirements, insufficient
authority in some areas, and new complex or unfamiliar tasks are certain to occur. Only
uncertainties are which ones will occur and when. In fact, timing of these disasters is not
random.
There are times, conditions and events in life of every project when progress depends on
subcontractors, or weather, or coordination or resource availability, and plans to deal with
unfavorable contingencies should be developed early in project's life cycle. Some project
managers disdain this section of plan on grounds that crises cannot be predicted. Further,
they claim to be very effective firefighters. It is quite possible that when one finds such
project manager, one has discovered arsonist. No amount of current planning can solve
current crises, but preplanning may avert some.
These are elements that constitute project plan and are basis for more detailed planning of
budgets, schedules, work plan, and general management of project. Once this basic plan is fully
developed and approved, it is disseminated to all interested parties.
• Introduction/Overview:
The purpose or mission of the project is stated in one or two paragraphs, followed by a set
of concrete objectives. The mission statement is all encompassing, establishing why the
project exists. Mission statements can be general or specific. They also reference the
customer if the project is being performed under contract or for a third party.
Project objectives are outlined as specific goals to be accomplished and to which status they
can be applied. For instance, objectives for a small construction project might include a
good location; a modern energy-efficient economic design; a fully furnished facility; a
complete set of project documents; compliance with all laws, codes, and requirements; a
standard profit margin; and a completion date.
Planning becomes straightforward when objectives are defined for key areas. Objectives
can be established for every aspect of the project, including scope of work, organization,
management, systems, environment, safety, and overall completion of the project (i.e., final
cost and schedule dates). Established objectives in the following areas facilitate detailed
planning, systems development, and work performance:
o Technical objectives
o Schedule objectives
o Cost objectives
o Organizational/personnel-related objectives
o Quality objectives
o Environmental safety and health objectives
o Contracting/procurement objectives
o Management system objectives
Well-defined objectives enhance the reliability of subsequent planning. Once objectives are stated in
concise terms, they allow for the development of the project scope of work and the work breakdown
structure.
• Work Scope:
The work scope section of the project management plan demonstrates how well the project
is understood.
It includes narrative descriptions of all elements of the project’s scope of work. It clearly
identifies the products or services to be provided to the customer. The statement of work
contains enough information to allow development of the Work Breakdown Structures
(WBS), schedules, and cost estimates, as well as assignment of responsibilities.
This section can address the project phases and include special plans associated with those
phases, such as the Research and Development plan, engineering/design plans, construction
plan, manufacturing plan, facility start-up plan, or transition plan. It may also describe the
systems management activities, including systems engineering and integration, to ensure
project life cycle perspective. In other words, it shows that the activities necessary to ensure
that the design and final products meet customer requirements are all planned and managed
properly and can be integrated and operated as intended, and that start up, transition,
operation, and completion activities are also planned and managed properly.
To simplify preparation, the work scope can be prepared in outline form, which can then be
used to develop the Work Breakdown Structures (WBS). Often the Work Breakdown
Structure (WBS) and work scope are prepared in parallel, with the resultant narrative
description of the work called a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) dictionary.
• Planning Basis:
The planning basis section provides for the documentation of key approaches, assumptions,
requirements, and other factors considered during preparation of the project management
plan. The following topics are addressed in this section:
2. Requirements:
This provides initial bases for estimating quantities and costs associated with
those resources. Overlooking facilities issues during project planning leads to
schedule slippages, cost overruns, unhappy project participants, and untold
headaches for the project managers. For small projects, facility requirements
may not be a big issue; for larger projects, they can be critical.
Functional and operational requirements spell out what the system, facility, or
product being produced is intended to do. They provide the basis for the
engineering, design, and planning of the system, facility, or product. Where
Functional and operational requirements exist, listing or identifying them
greatly simplifies and facilitates the design process. Mandatory data
requirements, management directives, or special instructions are also identified
and documented during the planning process. Special instructions may include
directions from the customer or upper management or may be spelled out in
contract documents.
3. Constraints:
For instance, if all project work is to be performed within the parent (host)
organization with minimum subcontract support that approach impacts planning
of resources and organizational issues. If work is to be “fast-tracked” by
overlapping design and construction activities, or by performing more work in
parallel, then that approach can be described. Communication of strategies to
project participants can be done effectively by devoting several paragraphs to
that topic in this section of the project management plan.
5. Key Assumptions:
This subject may be needed to limit the scope of work. It highlights specific
and relatively obvious issues, such as documentation, training, or follow-on
support, which customers often assume but which cost money and have not
been included in the project plan. Clarification of these scoping questions saves
headaches later, in some cases even avoiding litigation.
Systems integration (sometimes called systems engineering) plays crucial role in performance
aspect of project. We are using this phrase to include any technical specialist in science or art of
project who is capable of performing role of integrating technical discipline to achieve
customer’s objectives, and/or integrating project into customer’s system.
1. Performance:
2. Effectiveness:
It is not unusual for clients to violate any or all of these seemingly logical dicta.
Tolerances specified to far closer limits than any possible system requirement,
superfluous “bells and whistles,” and “off shelf” components that do not work well with
rest of system are so common they seem to be taken for granted by both client and
vendor. Causes of these strange occurrences are probably associated with some
combination of inherent distrust between buyer and seller, desire to over-specify in
order “to be sure” and feeling that “this part will do just as well”. These attitudes can be
softened and replaced with others that are more helpful to process of systems
integration.
3. Cost:
Systems integration plays major role in success or failure of any project. If risky
approach is taken by systems integration, it may delay project. If approach is too
conservative, we forego opportunities for enhanced project capabilities or advantageous
project economies. Good design will take all these tradeoffs avoid locking project into
rigid solution with little flexibility or adaptability in case problems occur later on or
changes in environmental demand changes in project performance or effectiveness.