Sustainable Development Programme and Policies
Sustainable Development Programme and Policies
Learning objectives
Introduction
In 2011, the global population reached the 7 billion mark, it stands at almost 7.9
billion in 2021, and it's expected to grow to around 8.5 billion in 2030, 9.7 billion in
2050, and 10.9 billion in 2100. However, the world has grown more aware of
environmental issues during the last few decades. The United Nations Conference on
Environment and Development (UNCED) and other international organizations focus
on pressing global issues. Some of the global issues include:
species extinction,
depletion of the ozone layer that protects the earth,
destruction of tropical and old-growth forests and wetlands, and
the steady buildup of "greenhouse" gases like carbon dioxide that cause
global warming and climate change.
The UNEP reports provide proof that the international environmental issues
mentioned at the UNCED conference in 1992 have persisted or gotten worse. UNEP
also cites exposure to toxic chemicals and hazardous wastes, nitrogen pollution in
freshwater and oceans, water contamination and diminishing groundwater supplies,
damage to forest and freshwater ecosystems, overexploitation of major ocean
fisheries, urban air pollution and wastes, an issue where significant reductions in
emissions have been achieved through international agreement.
The demographic problem, including population increase that adds more than
70 million people per year, is what underlies all of these issues. Besides, scientists
and governments have started searching for sustainable development solutions
(Figure 1) in response to the pressing threat of environmental degradation.
Figure 1 Scientific solution for sustainable development
The United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development
(WCED, 1987) (Figure 2) coined a definition of sustainable development, which is
probably the most well-known in all of sustainability literature:
Figure 2 WCED
“Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the
ability of future generations to meet their own needs”.
• How can we protect the planetary systems that sustain life from irreparable
harm?
• How can we prevent the tremendous environmental cost that irresponsible
corporate practices cause?
• How can the "environment-friendly" development idea strike a balance
between environmental protection and economic growth?
The question of sustainability of economic activity has already taken centre
stage and will only grow in significance over the next few decades. The term
"sustainability" has gained widespread popularity as a potential remedy for a number
of global, regional, and local issues that are currently plaguing society, such as
resource scarcity, pollution, overcrowding, sickness, and political unrest.
Though it has been defined in a variety of ways, sustainable development
actually has three dimensions: economic, environmental, and social. Policies and
programs for sustainable development work to make sure that development is carried
out in the proper way, but more importantly, that the right things are done. With the
application of sustainable practices for better agricultural output, energy consumption,
natural resource management, and industrial production, the concept of sustainable
development incorporates both economic and environmental aims.
Today, we have enough information to say that these methods have great
potential but have not yet gained widespread acceptance. Limits on population growth
and material consumption are also necessary for a sustainable global economy. As a
result, regional sustainability is the method advocated for raising human life quality
within the confines of the global environment. It entails finding ways to enhance human
welfare without harming the environment or affecting the welfare of other people.
• Understanding the connections between the economy, society, and
environment;
• living within the earth's capacity to support life; and
• preserving a fair distribution of resources and opportunities for this generation
and the one next;
are all aspects of sustainable measures.
Much of the motivation to work on sustainable development at the international,
national, and local level came from the 1992 Rio Conference on the Environment and
Development (UNCED) (Figure 3), which established Agenda 21, the Rio Declaration,
and several treaties. As a response, some nations adopted sustainable development
strategies.
Polluter-pays principle
The National Resource Efficiency Policy (NREP) policy enlists a number of
market-based and regulatory instruments that can drive resource efficiency. The
polluter-pays-principle (PPP) is one such instrument that will play a central role in
doing so.
The PPP is an internationally recognized market instrument to abate pollution.
Historically its application has been rare and often associated with big polluters. As
India readies its industries to transition into a more resource efficient future, it will be
vital to ensure proper enactment of PPP down to the local level. The Rio Declaration
adopted at the UN Conference on Environment and Development in 1972 first
introduced the Polluter-pays-Principle at an international level. Principle 16 in the
declaration states:
“National authorities should endeavour to promote the internalization of
environmental costs and the use of economic instruments, taking into account the
approach that the polluter should, in principle, bear the cost of pollution, with due
regard to the public interest and without distorting international trade and investment.”
The PPP is primarily legal and an ethical instrument that has been a part of
environmental legislation in the European Union. In India landmark cases like M.C.
Mehta vs. Union of India in 1986 enacted the PPP holding the polluter liable for
damages due to oleum gas leak. Since then, the National Green Tribunal (NGT) uses
PPP as one of their core principles to hold state governments and industries
responsible for causing environmental and societal harm. Cost of abatement is what
needs to be internalized to the costing structure of the company. What companies are
doing currently is that they are just calculating the private production cost. While there
is no blanket methodology to determine the cost, each type of resource will have a
specific approach.
For example:
Air: Cost of shifting to cleaner fuels can be considered as the cost of pollution
as well as secondary approach through health as that is cost incurred by society
Forest: Cost can be estimated through carbon sink opportunity of the forest
cover
PPP is there not just to discourage producers from overusing, but also to make
sure consumers make smarter more efficient choices. Since the production and
consumption of goods and services involves a large number of players, PPP will be
an effective tool when imposed in the form of market-based instruments. The effort to
integrate command-and-control approaches with market-based approaches can result
in a smooth transition given entities are levied appropriately, enabling them to develop
as well as be resource efficient. Initiatives like tradable pollution permits can be a
source of revenue for industries and consumers can benefit from deposit refund
schemes put in place by those industries. The call for a national level policy for
resource efficiency in India is a requirement if the country wants to develop in a
sustainable manner. Using polluter-pays-principle as a central tool in doing so can
support economic growth and well as development.